Last night was an important turning point in the history of Podcasting Liberally, as it marked the moment our show was mature enough to welcome its first, genuine, right-wing guest: Gen. JC Christian, Patriot, of the much reviled cesspool of theocracy, Jesus’ General. It was a very manly performance.
Joining the General and me in our left-right dialectic were Mollie, Will, Lee, and Darryl. Topic’s of discussion included immigration, the Iraq war, nuking Iran, the Darcy Burner Buzz, The General’s tatooed buttocks, and Markos & Jerome’s "Crashing the Gate" tour and how Democrats might want to focus on, um… winning.
The show is 51:56, and is available here as a 31.5 MB MP3. Please visit PodcastingLiberally.com for complete archives and RSS feeds.
[Recorded live at the Seattle chapter of Drinking Liberally. Special thanks to Confab creators Gavin and Richard for producing the show.]
UPDATE:
Just updated the link to the MP3, to actually link to this week’s recording. Duh-uh.
Will the buzz about darcy include the complaint filed over campaign financing violations?
Tebelius is too smart to file frivolous charges.
It will be interesting to see if anyone from the burner campaign comments. So far, it seems to be the most silent campaign around.
Ummmm.. Wrong show is posted..
I though that the rethugs were against big government? I guess they are until they aren’t.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/n.....alth_x.htm
You gotta laugh about the fact that the GOP is so hard up they are adopting Democratic positions.
Hey it’s okay with me if we have rethugs who support choice, education, the environment, living wages and the environment.
ROGER RABBIT POLL
Who the fuck is ?klake? and WHY is he/she/it so goddamn stupid?
[X ] 1. klake is a paid GOP troll
[ ] 2. klake is a 12-year-old kid posting on HA while simultaneously looking at dirty pictures in split-screen mode
[ ] 3. klake is a “sleeper cell†terrorist
[X ] 4. klake is a research lab chimpanzee who got out of the cage and is playing with a graduate student’s keyboard
[ ] 5. klake is a trained dolphin at Seaquarium
[ ] 6. klake is a lobotomy survivor at Western State
[ ] 7. klake is a kindergarten dropout living in a derelict car at a wrecking yard in Ellensburg who blogs at the local Starbucks without ever buying anything
[X ] 8. klake is a WSRP intern
[ ] 9. klake is a 6-year-old who was kidnapped by a Republican pedophile, and after long captivity, is suffering from Stockholm syndrome
[ ] 10. klake is a robo-calling machine that shorted out and turned bad
[X ] 11. klake is a nazi
[ ] 12. klake is the tailpipe of a 1962 Fairlane with cracked rings
LeftTurn, I think the Libertarians are more anti-government than the Republicans, who are in-turn more anti-government than the Democrats. As far as I can tell, the Republicans are pretty bad about abusing government for their own goals, but I’m certainly not endorsing the Democrats by making the commnet. That’s another story.
Clueless @3,
I guess I’m the one who’s clueless. Fixed the link.
Janet @2,
So my question is… how much do you get paid to waste your time trolling HA?
I haven’t yet inquired with the campaign about the complaint, but if Darcy’s folk made a reporting error, they’ll fix it. That’s the way the system is supposed to work. My understanding was that the video in question was created by volunteers not associated with any PAC. I’m not sure how one reports the value of that.
As for Tebelius… yeah… she’s fucking brilliant.
So, Janet S. is now darcyisvague
I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find she is also howwillmariavote
Man, even if the RNC is getting Janet’s Troll services for free, they are still paying too much!
FOR THOSE FOLKS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN WHO STARTED THE WATERMELON STORY.
http://WWW.MICHELLEMALKIN.COM/
WATERMELON MATH
BY MICHELLE MALKIN • APRIL 11, 2006 08:20 PM
I’ve been getting lots of e-mail about an idiotic math question reportedly crafted by a Bellevue (WA) Community College professor that takes a racist swipe at Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Here’s a message forwarded to me from Rev. Wayne Perryman of Mercer Island, Wa.:
Lets see “watermelon story” vs President lying us into war, and then lying about WMD after the fact.
Hmmm?
I’ve decided I am not in the least bit interested in the neocon distraction BS about the watermelon.
But if Klake wants to tell us the “my pet goat” story!
Takes a racist swipe? I thought right wingers like Malkin, MTR, Puddy/JCH, etc. LIKE IT when racism is used in political dialogue?
Darcy Burner—
Bad Driver
Bad Liar
The Pacific Northwest–it’s not known for being a Republican stronghold. Nonetheless, there are a few important developments in GOP politics out there right now that could well change the face of politics in the region. There’s also quite a bit of controversy, and as several races are heating up, innuendo, mischaracterization and misrepresentation are becoming the main political tools of some of the principal contenders.
Let’s start by looking at one of my favorites, the race for the 8th district in Washington, currently represented by Congressman Dave Reichert. In a state where policy-making off the back of extensive research and analysis is prized, and explaining policy by reference to religion or dogma is very much frowned upon, Congressman Reichert has become a respected representative known for his careful, independent study of issues, and his willingness–even as a first term Congressman–to break ranks with the GOP leadership on issues like the development of ANWR and the overhaul of endangered species legislation. Last month, he was recognized as a centrist by National Journal, probably because of these votes, his vote against federal intervention in the Terri Schiavo case, his vocal support for separation of church and state, and his belief in changing laws so that “everyone has the same rights” to ensure that legal hurdles for gay couples are eliminated, without gay marriage being legalized. He is an outstanding example of a legislator who takes an investigative approach to issues, and whose approach and views accord with large proportion of Washingtonians–and the majority of people in his district, based on my personal experience. He is a libertarian-leaning, environmentally concerned, supply-side Republican–just what the 8th district needs.
Reichert may have won his first race with just 51% of the vote, but his record makes him far stronger than anyone would have predicted. Certainly, Reichert is looking stronger than his Democratic challenger, Darcy Burner, a former Microsoft executive who for some reason thought her anti-war platform and her lack of discussion on her website of her positions on tax and spending–which are of core concern in this fiscally conservative district–would play to the masses. Having realized that Reichert’s record is in sync with the profile of the district–and that in line with that, he’s doing well in raising money–she and fellow Washington Democrats have resorted to innuendo, mischaracterization and misrepresentation in order to weaken his chances.
Back in February, Burner’s campaign tried to imply that Reichert is anti-environment by pointing to a 28% rating by the League of Conservation Voters. This is a blatant mischaracterization of Reichert’s record and stance when it comes to the environment–a big issue in the 8th district. Reichert gets ratings in the 30s from the American Wilderness Coalition and the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund. In the case of AWC, that means that Joe Lieberman outranks Reichert by less than 20%– making the divergence between him and those recognized as Congressional leaders on environmental protection initiatives look smaller than Ms Burner seeks to imply. And Reichert still outranks moderate Republicans like Jim Kolbe by more than 20%, based on LCV’s 2005 rating.
Plus, the Sierra Club commended Reichert for his refusal to back ANWR drilling–a position which sadly he, and many other pro-environment legislators had to abandon after being forced to choose between paying for continued military operations in Iraq, or preventing drilling.
8th district voters should pay attention on this one. Reichert may not be an eco-warrior like some from Washington. But when allegations are made to suggest that he reliably toes the party line on the environment, and that he’s weak when it comes to environmental protection, it’s mischaracterization and distortion of the worst kind. And it’s all the less credible given that the anti-environment innuendo is being made by a candidate whose website shows that she is not endorsed by a single environmental organization.
And it’s all the less credible given that the anti-environment innuendo is being made by a candidate whose website shows that she is not endorsed by a single environmental organization.
Commentby right-where-I-want-to-be— 4/12/06@ 1:23 pm
Goldy is that you posting here under an alias?
Wow, the GOP is really scared of Burner. Between Sharansky’s propaganda and posts like above, it is all they can talk about.
And isn’t it interesting in a thread about Cantwell, you bring up ANWAR, which brings up McGavick’s sucking up to Ted Stevens:
Sen. Ted Stevens’ brother-in-law Bill Bittner is a sponsor of the McGavick event. Bittner has also played a major role in business deals that made Stevens a millionaire.
“An Anchorage lawyer and lobbyist, Bittner represents major business interests for whom the senator has repeatedly gone to bat,” the Los Angeles Times found in a 2003 investigation.
“Stevens engineered a $9.6 million federal appropriation that chiefly benefited a Bittner client, part of South Korea’s Hyundai conglomerate. Stevens tucked a single line into a must-pass appropriations bill that used federal tax dollars to buy the company out of a coal-loading facility in Seward.
Read all about the culture of corruption that McGavick wants to bring down south from Alaska to our fair state:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/.....oel12.html
Yep, corruption is right where the right wants to be.
RWIWTB at 14 has come up with Reichert’s new campaign slogan:
“He’s not as useless as some other Republicans!”
“Just 51%” What’s it called when a Dem gets 51%?
Flake at 10:
The women who called out the question today on the Commentators says she does not think this is a policital issue.
Strange that Michelle Malkin does not mention that.
And, what is the deal. The question was bad, the teacher who wrote it changed it and said he did not mean anything by it. Unless you have proof (and, for you wingnuts: Proof: the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact, http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/proof )that there was anything else, this is a non-story.
Now, speaking of proof. Let’s turn to a real story:
On May 29, 2003, 50 days after the fall of Baghdad, President Bush proclaimed a fresh victory for his administration in Iraq: Two small trailers captured by U.S. and Kurdish troops had turned out to be long-sought mobile �biological laboratories.� He declared, �We have found the weapons of mass destruction.�
The claim, repeated by top administration officials for months afterward, was hailed at the time as a vindication of the decision to go to war. But even as Bush spoke, U.S. intelligence officials possessed powerful evidence that it was not true.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Who said the following recently?
“The Democratic leadership thinks that the GOP implosion will ipso facto translate to Democratic victories in November. But the electorate is universally disenchanted with politics.
The GOP has proven, time and time again, that it is incapable of governing. But Democrats have not shown they are any different. They do not paint any bright lines between them and us. And they do nothing to motivate the Democratic base to turn out and vote….
There has got to be change in strategy from DC. Because right now, the Democratic leadership is just as reality-addled as the GOP’s.”
The answer here!
Your comments? Or is he a Rovian robot too?
Wayne at 17:
Good idea. Other possible Reichert campaign slogans:
Reichert: Unlike Mike McGavick, he doesn’t want to rape the environment.
Reichert: Unlike most Republican’s, he’s happy that Terri’s dead.
Reichert: “I barely even know Tom Delay.”
Reichert: Not quite as loony as the rest of my party!
JDB – read the last paragraph on page 1. Two teams found the trailers to be used for wmd, so the conclusion that the trailers were nothing was not unanimous.
As for senators getting money for their friends:
http://www.nytimes.com/
But Hillary is a dem, so it is okay.
Goldy – you outed me! I wasn’t even trying to hide very well, but whatever.
@ 14 Commentby right-where-I-want-to-be— 4/12/06@ 1:23 pm
This troll has posted the same “comment” on another thread. What the Troll is not telling you here is that the “comment” comes from Liz mair – a wingnut blogger at RedState blog.
More horseshit from the wacky wingnuts.
Janet S. @ 22 “1. Two teams found the trailers to be used for wmd, so the conclusion that the trailers were nothing was not unanimous.”
No, actually NONE of the trailers were used for wmd.
Or are you trying to say they found wmd, Janet?
Go ahead. Make the claim, and make a fool of yourself.
Retired US Iraq general demands Rumsfeld resign
“In recent weeks, retired Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Gregory Newbold, Army Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton and Marine Corps Gen. Anthony Zinni all spoke out against Rumsfeld. This comes as opinion polls show eroding public support for the 3-year-old war in which about 2,360 U.S. troops have died”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/200.....neral_dc_2
at 20:
Oooh! I like games. Let’s try a more interesting one:
Fill in the blanks:
_____ __________, the former ___________ Speaker of the House, told students and faculty at the University of South Dakota Monday that the United States should pull out of Iraq and leave a small force there, just as it did post-war in Korea and Germany.
“It was an enormous mistake for us to try to occupy that country after June of 2003,” __________ said during a question-and-answer session at the school. “We have to pull back, and we have to recognize it.”
Some wacko member of the ANSWER coalition, a cut and run Democrat endorsing the Murtha Plan? Howard Dean on a bender?
Click and find out!
http://www.argusleader.com/app.....10311/1001
You can believe what you want, but:
“Intelligence analysts involved in high-level discussions about the trailers noted that the technical team was among several groups that analyzed the suspected mobile labs throughout the spring and summer of 2003. Two teams of military experts who viewed the trailers soon after their discovery concluded that the facilities were weapons labs, a finding that strongly influenced views of intelligence officials in Washington, the analysts said. “It was hotly debated, and there were experts making arguments on both sides,” said one former senior official who spoke on the condition that he not be identified.”
Janet “You can believe what lies you want, but:”
“On May 29, 2003, Bush hailed the capture of two trailers in Iraq as mobile biological laboratories and declared, “We have found the weapons of mass destruction.””
“Bush cited the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction as the prime justification for invading Iraq. No such weapons were found. ”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/200....._labs_dc_4
Remeber the Press Dinner a year after the war started and Bush made the Hilarious Video of him searching for WMD under his desk, and saying “No, no WMD there!”
Why do you think he made that “Hilarious” video if they had already found the WMD?
Let me tell you why: Because there was no WMD and the war was based on lies.
Janet…you ARE an ignorant slut.
Roger and Gang did some send Dean Logan to Italy to count their votes, and recount them again, and stuff the ballots.
http://www.nytimes.com/
Berlusconi Says He Will Contest Italy Vote Tally
By IAN FISHER
Published: April 12, 2006
ROME, April 11 � Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi on Tuesday challenged his opponent’s wisp of a victory in the divisive national elections, alternately suggesting a recount, or a German-style grand coalition government.
Although final results announced Tuesday showed his center-left opponent, Romano Prodi, with a thin lead in both houses of Parliament, Mr. Berlusconi contended that the vote was so close that there was ample room for error.
“We cannot recognize the outcome of a vote until there is a definitive, clear judgment,” he said, refusing to concede defeat after two days of voting on Sunday and Monday and a suspenseful night of returns that whipped back and forth before settling finally on Mr. Prodi. “Until that day, no one can say they have won.”
Janet:
Nothing you have posted changes the facts. Yes, when the trailers were first found there was debate over them. Remember, Colin Powel had told us they had moblie weapons making facilities.
However, as more and more evidence came in, it was clear that there were none.
The point is that Bush knew this before he talked about the trailers. The reports by then were unanimous. Debate before the fact does not excuse Bush using this when the debate had been settled.
Klake:
Actually, it sounds like Berlusconi has been reading U(SP).
All weapons of mass destruction have been found in Dickless Cheney’s trunk.
Roger and Gang a book you all must read.
http://search.barnesandnoble.c.....#038;itm=1
Too bad you libs didn’t have family on Flight 93. Then maybe you wouldn’t be such shit heads.
Janet…you ARE an ignorant slut.
Commentby rujax206— 4/12/06@ 2:06 pm
*nd y**’re * c*rks*ck*r!
Care to buy a vowel?
No…but I have some REALITY I’ll give ya’ for free!
P.S. It’s not bad BTW…you should try it sometime (your s/o will probably have a heart attack)…tastes like chicken.
One thing that comes across in all the comment threads at HA is how frightened the Republicans are. Nearly every right-wing blog or board is highly moderated and no comments from opposing viewpoints are allowed…which is a sure sign that the operators just want to circle-jerk, not discuss. When they come to a blog like this, with open comment threads, they realize that just because they all reinforce each other on their home ground it’s not the way the rest of the populace feels. Hence the obfuscation of idiots like klake who realize their position is hopeless and therefore try to distract with trivial assertions, most of them from far-right nut-papers, and the weak arguments of the Janet S’s of the world, trying to spin fact into fiction.
It’s awesome how scared they are. If this is at all orchestrated, the fact that they encourage racist idiots like JCH shows how out of touch they are with the mainstream.
Darcy Burner—
Bad Driver
Bad Liar
Burner hasn’t even begun to be “micro-analyzed”…..but she has amateurishly stubbed her toe on a ridiculous ad, her law school claim & other questionable resume representations.
People are looking for honest, forthright candidates.
Burner has already burned her fingers.
My guess is she will be forced to drop out.
@ 40
My guess is she will be forced to drop out.
Commentby Mr. Cynical— 4/12/06@ 3:26 pm
Prediction! We will soon see the return of Mr. Irrelevent.
Flake at 35:
Here are two similar books by similar authors that you would probably like:
http://www.amazon.com/
http://www.amazon.com/
And thanks for revealing so much about yourself!
NEWS FLASH!
Joel Connelly is apparently leading a Bellevue Voter Registration drive….encouraging folks to claim SOMEDAY they plan to live in Bellevue!!!!!!!!!
His pals, the Lawsky’s, have successfully voted in Island County using Joel’s vacation retreat address EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE NEVER LIVED THERE and claim the Homestead Exemption on their DC Residience which REQUIRES declaring that DC Home as their principal residence!
Oh what a tangled web Joel weaves!
What a DOOFUS!
Cynical @40,
Burner forced to drop out? Well, since you sound so confident, let’s place some money on it.
Really. You’d think I’d learned my lesson with Mark the Welcher, but you and I have a much longer history. So what say… you wanna put your money where your mouth is?
Ms. Chickenhawk:
Ms. Burner did very well in her fund raising. Well enough to have you all shaking in fear. And in return, you have tried some very bad personal attacks that have been read and believe by the twenty or so wingnuts at U(sp), and been laughed off the internet by everyone else.
Heck, even half of your fellow kool-aid drinkers are posting “This is really petty and making us all look like fools” over at the minnows site.
How do you manage when you live each day in fear now that you know most people are buying your bullshit?
” Too bad you libs didn’t have family on Flight 93. Then maybe you wouldn’t be such shit heads. ”
If I had relative on Flight 93, I think I would be rabidly angry at BushCo’s inability to catch OBL, and his lying us into a war with a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, and pulling troops and money from the chase for OBL to fight this disaster in Iraq.
Support of Bush is a disgrace to the memory of those lost on 9/11.
Sorry, that should read “are not buying your bullshit.”
Here are two similar books by similar authors that you would probably like:
http://www.amazon.com/
http://www.amazon.com/
And thanks for revealing so much about yourself!
Commentby JDB— 4/12/06@ 3:31 pm
Well thanks JDB are you talking from experience or are you just being funny? You know you might offend Bob from Boeing plus you would not want to that to you best friend.
32- The reports by then were unanimous.
No, one of three reports were unanimous, or 33%.
Horsesass is regurgitating a WaPo story that regurgitates a 3 year-old story by Judith Miller at NYT.
http://www.captainsquartersblo.....006736.php
CNN Video
http://media.nationalreview.com/060412_01.wmv
http://www.seixon.com/blog/arc.....arfar.html
Is that all the far left has these days?
Posting 37
I didn’t post this. I guess this is about par for the course for the ethical level of this group.
Algore:
No, the definitive report was unanimous. And the White House had that report before Bush declared that he had finally found WMD.
Also, the intial two reports were heavily disputed, but, as usual, Bush presented the findings as if there were no questions raised.
Wait a minute, that sounds just like what he did before the war.
Well, you have to give him credit for being consitently a liar. Thanks for pointing that out Algore.
Flake:
I just assumed you had a wierd facination with trannies based upon the link you posted.
Goldy – you outed me! I wasn’t even trying to hide very well, but whatever.
Commentby Janet S— 4/12/06@ 1:52 pm
Posting 37
I didn’t post this. I guess this is about par for the course for the ethical level of this group.
Commentby Janet S— 4/12/06@ 4:36 pm
1
What’s that got to do with Iraq?
Cynical @40,
Burner forced to drop out? Well, since you sound so confident, let’s place some money on it.
Commentby Goldy— 4/12/06@ 3:32 pm
I’m an “investor”….not a gambler.
Perhaps she will hang in there thru thick & thin.
But I’ll bet there will be plenty of times when she feels like dropping out of this madness….the combination of pressure from accountability for her past “accomplishments” by her opponent (He isn’t going to merely bow & open doors for her….although Reichert is a gentleman) AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, the constant pressure from the assholes surrounding her…. pushing her and telling her what to do, say & wear.
FYI===Assholes surrounding her means YOU and the other KLOWNS!!
LOL!!
6
“LeftTurn, I think the Libertarians are more anti-government than the Republicans, who are in-turn more anti-government than the Democrats. As far as I can tell, the Republicans are pretty bad about abusing government for their own goals, but I’m certainly not endorsing the Democrats by making the commnet. That’s another story. Commentby Libertarian— 4/12/06@ 11:58 am”
You forgot to mention the Anarchists are more anti-government than the libertarians, and the Hell’s Angels and Bandidos are more anti-government than the Anarchists!
Actually, the Bandidos are more anti-Bandidos than anything else, based on recent news events.
14
“The Pacific Northwest–it’s not known for being a Republican stronghold. Nonetheless, there are a few important developments in GOP politics out there right now that could well change the face of politics in the region.”
What did Kevin Carns get arrested for?
14 (continued)
So the breaking news this afternoon is that someone in Washington’s GOP finally has figured out you have to be more moderate than the wingbat armageddon looneytunes to get elected in this state?
21
How about this one?
“I’m a good cop with bad friends!”
23
Ha! Another PLAGIARIST troll is caught!!
This post is copyrighted (c) 2006 by Roger Rabbit. Any unauthorized reproduction in any form by a trollfuck will be shot!!!
Flaky klake @35
Frankly, flaky, I’m a busy bunny and Ann Coulter isn’t real high on my reading list, but if she tries to arrest me for being a liberal she’s gonna be real high on my target list.
One good turn deserves another, I always say! Here’s some light summer reading for you, klake:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/produ.....8;n=283155
One good turn deserves another, I always say! Here’s some light summer reading for you, klake:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/produ.....8;n=283155
Commentby Roger Rabbit— 4/12/06@ 5:26 pm
How sweet Roger that is a great book, but the grayhounds like the rabbits for another reason. Thanks for thinking of me.
Just to get the old blood boilin’ for you LEFTIST PINHEADED KLOWNS, all I have to do is remind you:
GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!GEORGE BUSH IS PRESIDENT!
And hell, I don’t even like Bush. I just know it pisses you retarded LEFTISTS off.
Ms: Chickenhawk:
Let’s face it; the reason you are so agitated and are so upset is obvious:
GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!GEORGE BUSH IS THE RUIN OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!
Mr Cynical @ 66
“And hell, I don’t even like Bush. I just know it pisses you retarded LEFTISTS off.”
Actually, it just embarasses me.
But…I’m guessing it kind-a embarasses you a little bit, too, huh, Cynical?
-Frankly, flaky, I’m a busy bunny and Ann Coulter isn’t real high on my reading list, but if she tries to arrest me for being a liberal she’s gonna be real high on my target list. –
Rabbit: don’t waste your lead. Coulter is bound to end up strung to a ceiling somewhere, clad in full latex, with a bit too much “dominatrix” going on around her. Like Roy Cohen, J Edgar Hoover and Rush Limbaugh, Coulter’s demons are bound to catch up with her.
66 – BOZO, the truth is you probably hate everyone – no one compares to the know-it-all Klown that is the BOZO.
I’m an “investor”….not a gambler.
I get it BOZO. When you tried to make a sucker’s bet with Goldy over I-912 that was an investment. Clever…
Well at least you’re honest about your poor record as a political prognosticator – NOT!
Caleb unbiased deathbed librarians discerning baggers dispatched actuals infidels?
classifiers about,stagers plastic.differentiate.pester processing paperback!choker!
heaved bunch rockabye successfully updates superb aircraft barest
Polyphemus tilt suppresses?wastefulness:dabble yearned reassessment:…
specialization Promethean Falkland!despise birthplaces,teething
assuaged.excretory.aim apportioning,Blackwells concretely Crispin?
Take the first step in controlling your debt situation – This site provides debt consolidation loans and loan advice for people who needs to consolidate debt. Not Johnny debt, just get rid of debt. Consolidation loans. Apply now for a free debt consolidation quote. Life has just begon to be better.
Array
mortgage refinancing home equity loan Mortgage
great directory http://www.instant-dating-success.com
http://www.bestsellsite.com