Following up on Goldy’s earlier post, I considered titling this “The body of contemporary conservatism.”
This is part II of Max Blumenthal’s unauthorized CPAC documentary:
Can’t Bring Yourself to Type the Word “Ass”?
Eager to share our brilliant political commentary and blunt media criticism, but too genteel to link to horsesass.org? Well, good news, ladies: we also answer to HASeattle.com, because, you know, whatever. You're welcome!
EXCELLENT! HYPOCRISY AND LIES – THE BREAD AND BUTTER OF WINGNUT TRAITORS AND LOSERS!!!
LIKE MTR AND ID(IOT)GAF!!!
MIT Perfessor dismisses global warming as “religion”.
http://www.cdfe.org/global_warming_religion.htm
Huh? What “consensus”?
And for you McDermott voters out there, a “meteorologist” is NOT some who studies shooting stars.
QUESTIONS FOR WINGNUT LOSER MTR:
1) ARE YOU ID(IOT)GAF, A KING COUNTRY EMT?
2) A LOW-LIFE WELSHER WHO THROWS DOWN A CHALLENGE AND THEN RUNS AWAY LIKE A WHIPPED DOG WHEN HE LOSES
3) BOTH OF THE ABOVE
S/COUNTRY/COUNTY/
The righties must really hate it that we have video evidence of their REAL agenda, which is to corrupt and defeat our Constitution and laws.
I personally can’t wait for global warming season (summer) to get here. This winter felt like the ones in the 70’s (the coming ice age).
@2 Still trying to paddle that canoe up a waterfall, Redneck?
@6 We can give you a reasonable simulation by strapping you into an electric chair — hey, just kidding!!! Ann Coulter humor, ya know?
I can understand the Gopers hiring a fake Marine to peddle their warmonger agenda — after all, everything else about Republicans is fake, too … including their fake patriotism — but a GAY PORN STAR? Hell, there’s lots of Latinos hanging around my neighborhood Home Depot who’ll do it for $6 an hour.
The Nevada Democrats are absolutely right to not let GOP operatives like Ailes dictate the tone or terms of the presidential debates. Fox is not a legitimate news organizations, and Democratic candidates should freeze Fox out of the campaign by boycotting Fox-sponsored or moderated events, and not giving Fox “reporters” access to their candidates. If Republicans can’t conduct themselves in a responsible and grown up manner, there’s no place at the table for them.
Hmmm … I can’t get into the new thread for some reason, so I’ll post it here first:
Hey Goldy, instead of teasing Dori’s girlfriend, you should steal her.
Mark The Redneck @ 2
You must be new to the anthropogenic global climate issue. Professor Lindzen has been a long-time, high-profile critic of the theory (but even more so, a critic of the politicization of the issue). Years ago he genuinely disagreed with the anthropogenic climate change hypothesis. These days he acknowledges that some of the scientific understanding is correct. He is more of a policy contrarian than a source of alternative scientific hypotheses. Specifically, he believes that humans contribute to global warming (although he believes human inputs are not as important as most scientists believe), but that the costs of mitigating the effects are too high for any benefits that will accrue.
That reminds me that when I was an undergraduate (1980s) a geology professor told me of going to a recent geology conference and hearing a paper delivered by the 80-some year old “father of modern Russian geology” (I don’t mean Alexander Karpinsky who published a theory of continental drift in the late 1800s–well before Wegener) The old-timer attempted to argue against plate tectonics. Everyone in the audience just lowered their heads, a little embarrassed, and politely pretended not to notice.
There are, no doubt, still a few plate tectonics “deniers” in the geophysical sciences, but it would be absurd to say that there is no scientific consensus on the theory of plate tectonics.
DARRYL, IT’S USELESS. MTR’S RELIGION IS GLOBAL WARMING DENIAL.
I can understand the Gopers hiring a fake Marine to peddle their warmonger agenda — after all,
Why would the republicans have to hire anyone in the Marines? The republicans are the Marines. Geeeshhh.
hahahahahaha. What is funny is that you pussy liberals think that there are liberals serving in the armed forces. You pussies cant take even take a blonde dishing out the same crap you libs have been dishing out for years. hehehehehe Liberals are pussies.
DARRYL, IT’S USELESS. MTR’S RELIGION IS GLOBAL WARMING DENIAL.
Hey at least Christianity can point to prophecy that has come true. I am still waiting for all those killer huricans that were suppose to happen in 2006. hehehehehe
Support our troops – take their place.
17
We have enough repubs fighting in the front lines. We need repubs staying home fighting the real enemy. At least our votes are harder to throw out.
Doofus @ 16,
“Hey at least Christianity can point to prophecy that has come true.”
Uh-huh. Prove it. I mean, the followers of the flying spaghetti monster claim that their prophecies have come true, too.
“I am still waiting for all those killer huricans that were suppose to happen in 2006.”
Ignorance is bliss, eh? It is true that the Atlantic hurricane season was less eventful in 2006; but, if you look at the entire world (i.e. globally), it was a killer year. A few interesting records were broken for tropical cyclonic weather systems (hurricanes, typhoons, or cyclones) overall. More people died in 2006 in cyclones than died in New Orleans in 2005.
Cases in point:
Tropical Cyclone Monica (category 5), which hit a sparsely populated part of Australia in April 2006, had maximum sustained winds of 180 mph and gusts to 220 mph. It was the most intense cyclone ever observed in the Southern Hemisphere.
Australia also got hit by cyclone Glenda (category 3) and cyclone Larry (category 3/4) in March. Cyclone Larry hit Queensland with a strength unmatched in that region for 100 years, and caused over a billion dollars of damage.
A record five category 3+ typhoons and one category 2 storm hit the Philippines in 2006, killing 3171 people.
Hurricane Ioke (called super typhoon Ioke after it crossed the International Date Line) was the strongest hurricane ever recorded in the Central Pacific. It broke the record for the duration (33 days straight, 36 days total) for a hurricane sustaining Category 4 or 5 strength.
Climatological scientists record a measure called the “accumulated cyclone energy index” (ACE index) for cyclonic weather systems. Hurricane Ioke was estimated at 81 ACE–stronger than the sum of all hurricanes in the Atlantic in 2006. Until this cyclone was measured, the previous records were 33 ACE (hurricane Ivan in 1997) and 27 (typhoon Paka in 1997). In other words 2006 saw a cyclone that unleashed more that twice the energy of any cyclone ever measured.
So, Doofus…it sucks to be you living in your bubble world of Faux News ignorance. The real-life facts are that 2006 was an exceptional season in terms of new records, deaths and property damage.
Ignorance is bliss, eh? It is true that the Atlantic hurricane season was less eventful in 2006;
Yes, truely and understatement looking back at the gloom and doom predictions from you clown from 2005.
Proof global warming is a religion not a science.
Tropical Cyclone Monica (category 5), which hit a sparsely populated part of Australia in April 2006, had maximum sustained winds of 180 mph and gusts to 220 mph. It was the most intense cyclone ever observed in the Southern Hemisphere.
Australia also got hit by cyclone Glenda (category 3) and cyclone Larry (category 3/4) in March. Cyclone Larry hit Queensland with a strength unmatched in that region for 100 years, and caused over a billion dollars of damage.
A record five category 3+ typhoons and one category 2 storm hit the Philippines in 2006, killing 3171 people.
Hurricane Ioke (called super typhoon Ioke after it crossed the International Date Line) was the strongest hurricane ever recorded in the Central Pacific. It broke the record for the duration (33 days straight, 36 days total) for a hurricane sustaining Category 4 or 5 strength.
Well hell if global warming was turely “global” why didnt that happen here? How far back does your “ever recorded” mean? Like 1800? Wowwwwwwww we are doomed… hheehheheheheheh
Dems lack the ability to put things in their proper perspective. Of course judging by the way they run the public schools you can understand why they have no understanding of real science or common sense.
Doofus @ 20
“Ignorance is bliss, eh? It is true that the Atlantic hurricane season was less eventful in 2006;”
Yes…but the Atlantic is only one piece of the tropical storm fields. Claiming that because one part of the field had a relative uneventful season means that the theory is incorrect is unadulterated ignorance. Since it is global warming that is expected to increase average intensity of weather events, you must look at the global pattern of weather patterns to test the hypothesis. I mean, even a second grader can understand that….
(Rufus…are you one of those people who think that if you flip a coin once, you will get 1/2 a head, just because the probability of turning up a head is 0.5?)
“Yes, truly and understatement looking back at the gloom and doom predictions from you clown from 2005.”
In fact, we got pretty much what was predicted–more extreme weather, more records broken. Of course, because there is substantial stochastisity to weather, the increased intensity of energy dissipation via tropical storm systems globally is an average phenomena—not a deterministic prediction. We should expect some variability including say an unspectacular season in one or more regions for a year or two. I know it is hard for ignorant nutcases like you, Rufus, to comprehend this, but this is something you should defer to the scientists on. They are actually trained in stochastic approaches to understanding the world. You’re, apparently, not.
“How far back does your “ever recorded” mean? Like 1800?”
In fact, the theory of anthropogenic climate change predicts noticeable differences in climate over a much shorter time scale than 200 years. The advent of advanced weather satellites in the 1970s has allowed scientists to measure and document, over the last 30 some years, a striking shift in the temperature distribution of the atmosphere (warmer at the surface and colder in the upper atmosphere) consistent with a change in heat transfer as carbon dioxide levels increase in the atmosphere.
You would be very hard-pressed to find an atmospheric scientist (you know, someone who actually knows what the fuck they are talking about) who could dispute the satellite temperature findings.
In fact, the theory of anthropogenic climate change predicts noticeable differences in climate over a much shorter time scale than 200 years.
Don’t you liberals believe that mommy erf is 5 billion years old? So what does a 200 year span of time compare to 5 billion? Ahh what is the use, explaining math to a lib-tard is useless.
DARRYL, DOOFUS IS ANOTHER RIGHT-WING LOSING IDIOT WHO BLEW OUT HIS EARDRUMS LISTENING TO FLUSH LIMPBONE AND MELTED HIS EYEBALLS WATCHING FAUX NOISE CHANNEL.
HE COMES HERE EVERY NIGHT RECYCLING THE SAME OLD DISCREDITED LIES. THERE’S NO REASONING WITH DOOFUS. HE’S BEEN BEATEN TIME AFTER TIME TILL HE’S BEEN REDUCED TO WHAT HE IS NOW – A GIBBERISHING RIGHT-WING FOOL.
Doofus @ 23
“Don’t you liberals believe that mommy erf is 5 billion years old?”
Wait…you don’t believe the earth is 4-5 billion years old? Oh my God…I didn’t realize you were that much of a fucking retard, Rufus. What is it, Ruf, buddy…4004 B.C. for you?
“So what does a 200 year span of time compare to 5 billion?”
In fact, it is precisely because scientists have identified how humans are changing the composition of the atmosphere on a very small time scale, that we should take notice.
The result will be an increase in sea level that will put low-lying areas under water (you know, like for 100,000,000 people currently living a few inches above sea level in Bangladesh). We can also expect changes to rainfall patterns and shifts in growing seasons that will result in more famines and more variability in where famines occur.
“Ahh what is the use, explaining math to a lib-tard is useless.”
Uh-huh. A “lesson” in math would be quite “interesting” from someone who believes an obscure 17th century Irish Bishop has the last word on calculating the age of the earth. (*snicker*)
Dan: Notice the libtards didn’t answer this one: “Don’t you liberals believe that mommy erf is 5 billion years old? So what does a 200 year span of time compare to 5 billion? Ahh what is the use, explaining math to a lib-tard is useless.”
Very good question Dan. A libtard will have to think long and hard on that. Well… no they won’t. They’ll ckeck Moveon.org like the Nevada Moonbat!ocratic Party for their daily marching orders.
Now I believe in it because it’s predicted in the Bible. So if libtards believe what’s in the Bible…
Waaaaaaa haaaaa haaaaa HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR!
Nuff SAID!
What is it, Ruf, buddy…4004 B.C. for you?
WELL I DON’T KNOW ABOUT DOOFUS (ACTUALLY I DO) BUT I SURE KNOW IT’S THAT WAY FOR PUDDYBUD!
NOAH ANCESTORS “WALKED WITH THE DINOSAURS”!
LMAO!!!!
This was way cool .. The music in the background was even sneaky … I was wondering if you had something similiar for say an Al Gore opening up his electric bill ?