Tonight on “The David Goldstein Show” on Newsradio 710-KIRO, from 7PM to 10PM:
7PM: Is John Edwards a faggot? That’s what cuddly, conservative pundit Ann Coulter said at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) conference, where she was the featured speaker:
“I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot–so….’”
The audience at this preeminent conservative event of the year gave Coulter an enthusiastic ovation. Does Coulter (who has endorsed GOP hopeful Mitt Romney) really represent, as Andrew Sullivan suggests, “the heart and soul of contemporary conservative activism”…? And if so, what does this say about contemporary conservative activism?
8PM: Should Reichert and McMorris give back their terrorist money? 22 Republicans representatives have benefited from money the NRCC raised from indicted terrorist financierAbdul Tawala Ibn Ali Alishtari — including WA’s Dave Reichert and Cathy McMorris-Rogers — and yet none have offered to give the money back. Republicans talk tough on terrorism, but I guess even a federal indictment doesn’t make your money not good enough for the NRCC.
9PM: Is it wrong to boo? Apparently.
Tune in tonight (or listen to the live stream) and give me a call: 1-877-710-KIRO (5476).
So over here on the East side at the State B basketball championships there is a raging debate on the proposed ban against booing during games. Interesting how many people have no problem sacrificing the First Amendment when it is inconvenient. I just ran a quick scan through the Seattle PI commentary thread on the matter, and in more than 100 comments i didn’t find a single spokesperson suggesting that this really a major constitutional matter; that our freedom of speech is sacrificable when we enter into a publicly owned arena to watch taxpayer supported activities. It would be one thing (and this would even be hugely tenuous at best) if they were proposing the ban because booing and offensive cheers led to immediate and dangerous violence. But NOoooo! The reason given is that booing and offensive cheering makes people not want to be high school coaches.
My Constutitional rights must not be infringed by stupidity and fascist mandates. Booooooo to you WA!!
She can’t make money unless she is “shocking.” I’d say Romney looks pretty comfortable taking photo-ops with someone wearing something Billy Idol would have worn on stage. Ahh, Republicans and their fetishes…
Methinks Coultermania has run its course; she’s taking flak from her own party:
“GOP Candidates Criticize Coulter for Slur
“By ADAM NAGOURNEY
“The New York Times
“WASHINGTON (March 3) — … The remarks by Ann Coulter … were sharply denounced by the candidates, Senator John McCain of Arizona, Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts … after Democrats, gay rights groups and bloggers raised a storm of protest over the remarks.
“Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference … on Friday, Ms. Coulter said, ‘I was going to have a few comments on … John Edwards, but … you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot,’ so I … can’t really talk about Edwards.’
“Mr. Edwards’s aides responded with an e-mail message that attacked Ms. Coulter … [for] ‘riling up hate ….’
“Ms. Coulter … said in an e-mail message: ‘C’mon, it was a joke. ….’
“Of the major Republican candidates, only Mr. McCain did not attend, but he denounced her remarks on Saturday morning. ‘The comments were wildly inappropriate,’ said his spokesman, Brian Jones.
“Kevin Madden, a spokesman for Mr. Romney, said: ‘It was an offensive remark.’ …”
Quoted under Fair Use; for complete story and/or copyright info, see http://tinyurl.com/2fzkwh
Roger Rabbit Commentary: Well holy shit, absolutely everything Coulter says is “wildly inappropriate” and “offensive” — where were these candidates’ denunciations when Coulter “joked” that liberals should be put in “concentration camps” and “executed”? Better (very) late then never; but none of them will get my vote. They pandered to this psycho and her lunatic fans far too long.
The only thing shocking about Tranny Coulter is that Adam’s apple she’s sporting.
@3 Having his picture taken with Coulter automatically disqualifies Romney for the presidency. That’s like posing with Himmler.
Here’s a way to easily send letters to the editor of any newspaper you want to: http://pol.moveon.org/lte/lte_.....aign_id=71
She used the “F” word.
So………………….
Fuck you, Ann, you ugly-fucking-cunt-bitch-slut. (by the way, the slut part is fairly well documented. The ugly part is indisputable).
Dems need to keep this comment alive through the next news cycle.
1. “Gates, Pace Give Update on Iraq, Afghanistan, Readiness” American Forces Press Service, February 15, 2007 http://www.defenselink.mil/new.....px?ID=3076
2. “Corners cut in rush to add troops” San Francisco Chronicle, February 4, 2007 http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/arti.....NUKVT1.DTL
3. “National Guard May Undertake Iraq Duty Early” New York Times, February 22, 2007 http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02.....litary.htm
4. “Corners cut in rush to add troops” San Francisco Chronicle, February 4, 2007 http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/arti.....NUKVT1.DTL
5. “2 Army Units Will Forgo Desert Training” Associated Press, February 27, 2007 http://www.examiner.com/a-5878.....ining.html
6. “Soldiers Face Neglect, Frustration At Army’s Top Medical Facility” Washington Post, February 18, 2007 http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....01172.html
7. “Psychological Needs of Military Personnel and Their Families are Increasing – Straining Military Health Care System” American Psychological Association, February 25, 2007 http://www.apa.org/releases/military_health.html
8. “Panel: Military Health System Needs Help” Washington Post, February 26, 2007 http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....74.htmlTop of Form
Hehehehe
I love it. All these pussy liber males getting offended by little ole Ann Coulter. Hehehehehe… no wonder you pussies dont serve in the military, you would make it. hahahahaha
http://preemptivekarma.com/
Retired Colonel Urges Troops to Refuse Orders
“Holy cow. Retired Army Reserves Colonel and former high-ranking diplomat Mary Ann Wright is asking military personnel to refuse orders if they are ordered to attack Iran. She says if they do follow orders, they will be committing “a war crime” in violation of “the Nuremberg Principles, the Geneva Conventions and the Laws of Land Warefare” and killing innocent civilians.
While refusal to drop bombs [on Iran] may initially draw punishment and the loss of one’s military career, those who refuse will save their soul, their conscience, and will prevent another criminal action in the name of our country by the Bush administration.
Can you imagine that? The Bush Administration has become so extremely irrational that someone of this stature is actually urging soldiers to refuse to follow orders. How much longer can the Administration hold out with the military turning on him as they are? And will Paul Craig Roberts see the military coup he has called for? Am I the only one who finds this situation alarming?”
WINGNUTS ARE TRAITORS AND THEY DON’T SUPPORT THE TROOPS.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....42498.html
What Is Missing at CPAC?
“Everyone is here… Michelle Malkin. Ann Coulter. Newt Gingrich. Duncan Hunter. Mitt Romney. Jeff Gannon. Sam Brownback. Melanie Morgan. John O’Neill… Oh so many heroes of the right…
And let me tell you – they’ve really turned out impressive support. At a time when the conservative agenda polls in the thirties, one gets the impression that they are all here.
Something else these folks have done well is turn out the new generation of wingnuts. The average age of the attendee here has got to be below 30 – there are literally thousands of College Republicans moving about in Brownian style from exhibit to exhibit, conference to conference, speaker to speaker, ballroom to ballroom.
Oh… but there’s one notable – striking, even – absence.
There are no military recruiters here. No United States Marine Corps. No Army, no Navy, no Air Force or National Guard – hell, not even the Coast Guard is here. Thousands and thousands of College Republicans, but not a single recruiter in sight…
Why?
Well, I have a theory or two (Michelle Malkin doesn’t agree with me, but more on that later).
Let’s try this: CPAC didn’t want to be embarrassed when pictures were released that showed recruiters standing around looking lonely. Similarly, recruiters know it’s a better investment of their time to troll “the other malls” rather than to recruit these nice white college boys.”
YOU CAN DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE PATRIOTISM OF THESE YOUNG WINGNUTS.
Spin spin spin.. All the retired military lefties get tremendous coverage from the MSM if they are against the current efforts in Iraq, but in the end they dont speak for the currently active (overwhelming republican) soldiers. Face it lefties, your are a permenant minority and will never be accepted in todays military. Nuff said.
9
How can your recruit people who are either already serving or did serve??? You got to get em young just before college. The ideal age for a soldier is anywhere between 19-25. Their value goes down after that.
Ah, a couple of anonymous coward wingnuts still claiming that the military is overwhelmingly in favor of the war.
Hate to burst your bubble, but the military is so opposed to this war that it is coming to a point that frightens me. The military must never decide that it is better able than the civilian leadership to decide which war should be fought, and which should not.
And our anonymous coward wingnuts are sitting by the sidelines, enjoying the spectacle of dead and mangled Americans, not even understanding that they are destroying the military.
Veterans groups, previously supportive of the Bush administration, are coming to see how little the loyalty and sacrifice of our brave men and women is valued by people who have not served, and will not serve. Many currently serving have already figured that out.
It is interesting how the wingnuts are starting to criticize the “retired military lefties “.
Amazing how many of us there are, but if the right wing types would have been willing to serve, perhaps there wouldn’t be so many of us.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITI.....ld.resign/
Army Times calls for Rumsfeld’s departure
(CNN) – “An editorial to be published in a major military publication Monday calls for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s replacement.
And the Pentagon is countering by saying the new “chorus of criticism” is “old news.”
The editorial will be in four independent publications that serves the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, and the U.S. Air Force, according to the senior managing editor for Army Times Publications, the papers’ parent company.
The timing was not prompted not by Tuesday’s midterm elections, said Army Times’ editor Robert Hodierne.
It was inspired after Bush’s stated earlier this week that he wants Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney in their posts through the end of his term, the editor said.”
RE 11: The average age of a soldier in WW II was 27 — in Vietnam, 19.
Are you saying that Vietnam era veterans were “worth more” than the greatest generation?
re 11: That is such desperate crap that you are pulling out of your nether regions.
You guys are dead meat, politically.
I vote NO CONFIDENCE in the Bush administration.
Let’s impeach the bastards and say good riddance to bad rubbish.
Cuddly, that skinny bitch with dark roots….?
We will bury the neocons IN ’08.
Even Newt Gingrich looks better than the KLOWNZ YOU GOT RUNNING FOR PRES.
Anyone who doesn’t admit that the military is not mostly republican is just a liar. The soldiers on the ground are overwhelmingly republican and pro Bush. The polls done by the lefty media are biased and are not to be taken seriously, and I should know because I worked at see BS. It is natural for people who have a right leaning political bent to want to serve in the military just like it is natural for cowardly, self-centered, pussy lefties to not want to serve. It is called common sense.
Uh, Mr. Rather?
The Military Times Media Group is “lefty media”?
These are the folks that publish Army Times, Navy Times, Air Force Times, etc… You wouldn’t know about those papers, as, for the most part, only people allowed on military bases ever see them.
If you know someone that is allowed to shop in the Exchange, you might ask him or her to get you a copy. They aren’t classified, and civilians like you are allowed to read them.
Now, considering that I am a Veteran with over twenty years active service, and you’re just an anonymous coward wingnut, I’m willing to bet that I know more about the military than you do.
http://tinyurl.com/flelx
I have an admission to make.
I actually feel sorry for bitch cunt Ann Coulter. She’s like the junior high school girl who eats boogers just to get attention.
Anagram:
Ann Coulter.
Real cunt, no?
(Yes, it seems to be a problem with the tinyurls. Eventually another copy of this will appear once it makes it through the filter.)
Uh, Mr. Rather?
The Military Times Media Group is “lefty media”?
These are the folks that publish Army Times, Navy Times, Air Force Times, etc… You wouldn’t know about those papers, as, for the most part, only people allowed on military bases ever see them.
If you know someone that is allowed to shop in the Exchange, you might ask him or her to get you a copy. They aren’t classified, and civilians like you are allowed to read them.
Now, considering that I am a Veteran with over twenty years active service, and you’re just an anonymous coward wingnut, I’m willing to bet that I know more about the military than you do.
You can look up my service at http://www.lonesailor.org . I post under my real name.
21
Here is something for you to read John:
From Navy Seals.com
http://www.navyseals.com/commu.....fm?id=6536
By Chad Miles
A recent report issued by the National Defense Committee, a nonprofit organization that supports the U.S. military and encourages veterans to run for elective office, recently found that 25 percent of ballots cast by military personnel in the 2004 presidential election went uncounted. Incredibly, that rate of disenfranchisement could be even higher due to the fact that the study relied on voluntary disclosure of information from local election officials.
Unfortunately, the issue of soldiers being disenfranchised during an election is nothing new. We all remember the 2000 Florida recount fiasco and the events surrounding it. During that election, the rate of uncounted ballots cast by members of the armed forces was even higher at a staggering 29 percent nationwide.
In Florida, which turned out to be the pivotal state in determining the winner of the 2000 election, around 1,400 military absentee votes were left uncounted, largely because of the role of lawyers working for the Democratic Party at local canvassing boards who followed a directive from the party to challenge all military ballots on the premise that they likely were votes for Republican nominee George W. Bush.
Although many lawmakers vowed that the level of disenfranchisement seen in the aftermath of that election would never happen again, it looks like it did.
According to the committee’s study, “Military and Overseas Absentee Voting in the 2004 Election,” the largest problem in managing military absentee ballots is not hostile attorneys, but rather what military historians call “the tyranny of distance” – the unavoidable difficulties inherent in getting ballots to our deployed military people serving overseas.
During the election in 2000, the study found that, 30 percent of military personnel did not receive their ballot in time to cast a vote. When you combine that figure with the number of votes that were tossed out for various reasons – including arriving to the absentee voters via snail mail past voting deadlines – you can see that the scope of the problem is enormous.
The challenge of getting ballots to soldiers was even worse during the 2004 election due to the post-9/11 deployments of military units to Iraq, Afghanistan and dozens of other countries in support of the Global War on Terror, the committee found. Units frequently on the move and mail delays caused by local threats such as the danger of roadside bombs made the task of getting ballots to the troops even more daunting.
However, military absentee voters once again in 2004 found themselves the target of partisan political maneuvering as had happened in Florida four years earlier.
Recognizing the fact that more time would be needed to count all of the military ballots arriving from overseas, the Pennsylvania legislature in 2004 requested that Gov. Edward G. Rendell authorize a two-week extension for the acceptance of military ballots to compensate for the issues surrounding the wartime situation in which our soldiers are now engaged.
However, in Pennsylvania in 2004, as in Florida in 2000, political operatives were motivated by their longstanding knowledge that a strong majority of military voters generally supports Republican candidates.
Rendell, a Democrat, initially refused the request to assist military absentee voters. But it later was discovered that he had launched an aggressive “get out the vote” information campaign within the state’s prison population, informing inmates of voting rights and providing them with absentee ballots for the election. Other studies have shown that a majority of the prison voting population supports Democratic candidates. The adverse publicity prompted Rendell to approve the extension for military overseas voters.
In Washington state, the U.S. Justice Department threatened to sue less than a month before the 2004 election because election officials had yet to even mail out absentee ballots to military personnel overseas. What may have been bureaucratic incompetence may well have altered the outcome of that state’s gubernatorial election.
The Washington state governor’s race between Republican nominee Dino Rossi and Democratic nominee Christine Gregoire turned out to be even tighter than the Florida presidential vote count in 2000. The Republican candidate won the first two re-counts but ultimately lost the third by 128 votes. With a total of 31,910 overseas ballots mailed out for that election, it’s easy to see that even a few lost, late or missing military votes made a huge impact in the election, ultimately deciding the race.
When it was time for Congress to ratify the 2004 election results and electoral vote count for the offices of President and Vice President during a joint session last December, two Democratic legislators challenged the results on the basis of voting irregularities and disenfranchisement. Was someone finally going to raise the issue of one-fourth of our deployed military men and women not having a voice in the democratic process? No.
The challenge concerned votes cast in the state of Ohio, which turned out to be the pivotal state in 2004 with enough electoral votes to swing the election and the Presidency to John Kerry. The challenge centered on disqualification of a newly created provisional ballot, not the military vote, and was nothing more than a symbolic protest by the party that had lost the presidential election.
It appears that once again the rights of military overseas voters are no longer an issue within the political establishment.
We should not have to still be struggling with this issue. Before the 2004 election, the Department of Defense launched an online voting system called the Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment (SERVE), designed to give military personnel deployed around the world the ability to vote instantly online. This would have obviously corrected the problems surrounding the reliance of postal mail for balloting, and put an end to the partisan shenanigans we saw in Florida with Democratic Party lawyers targeting military voters for ballot rejection.
Alas, DoD officials opted to shut down the SERVE program before the election due to security concerns dealing with the sensitive nature of the data and the possibility of illegitimate votes being tabulated. Since DoD manages to send thousands of classified messages daily around the globe, many of them stamped “Top Secret,” it is hard to imagine that these security and privacy concerns cannot be resolved.
It is ridiculous to have our troops filling out paper ballots and placing them in the mail in a day and age when publicly available technology allows you to take a picture and send it to someone on the other side of the world with a small cellphone. The disenfranchisement on the scale that we have seen in recent years is unacceptable, but it is definitely correctible.
If DoD officials take the time to develop a secure and dependable electronic voting system, some election results may be drastically different in the years to come – but unlike the number of contested elections we have seen since 2000, the results will more likely reflect the judgment of all of the voters – including those serving in harm’s way to protect our freedoms.
Contributing Editor Chad Miles is a U.S. Army veteran who served with the 82nd Airborne Division and the 5th Special Forces Group during the 1990s. He founded the website WhoServed.com, which tracks the military service of previous and current U.S. government leaders, and is currently pursuing a degree in political science from the University of Michigan – Dearborn. He can be reached at chad@whoserved.com. Send Feedback responses to dwfeedback@yahoo.com.
I am willing to bet there are a lot more soldiers like Chad then like you John. Take it for what it is worth.
Hey Voice of Chalk Scratching: Weren’t you and Ann Coulter classmates at Cornell University? She graduated with honors Scratchy. Et tu?
In Washington state, the U.S. Justice Department threatened to sue less than a month before the 2004 election because election officials had yet to even mail out absentee ballots to military personnel overseas. What may have been bureaucratic incompetence may well have altered the outcome of that state’s gubernatorial election.
Yes the liberals in Washington State are incompetent, but this was done on purpose. Honest liberals know that it is not in their best interest in getting ballots to the soldier out in the field.
Hey Voice of Chalk Scratching: Why not talk about the new China Sub Fleet.
http://www.washingtontimes.com.....-4462r.htm
“”This is a troubling development,” Richard Fisher, a specialist on the Chinese military with the private International Assessment and Strategy Center, said of the submarine buildup.
The five missile submarines, each equipped with 12 JL-2 missiles, shows that China is working to achieve a force of 120 long-range nuclear missiles over the next decade, about half of them to be carried on the submarines, Mr. Fisher said. The other half would be the 60 land-based DF-31 missiles that current deployment rates will give China by then, he said.
The 120 missiles also could have multiple-warheads, since China is known to have acquired all the needed technology from the U.S. during the 1990s.”
So headlice, when America understands this…
Uh, Dan?
A quick check would tell you that Mr. Miles is not a Navy Seal. He was the Republican candidate for Congress for the 14th Congressional District in Michigan. (Hardly an unbiased source.) At least part of this is pointed out at the bottom of the story.
He was soundly beaten by John Conyers, with 158,755 votes to Mr. Miles 27,367 votes. Seems that the voters of Michigan didn’t find him to be very credible.
26
A quick check would tell you that Mr. Miles is not a Navy Seal.
Your right John. The article does tell you where he served:
Contributing Editor Chad Miles is a U.S. Army veteran who served with the 82nd Airborne Division and the 5th Special Forces Group during the 1990s.
He was soundly beaten by John Conyers, with 158,755 votes to Mr. Miles 27,367 votes. Seems that the voters of Michigan didn’t find him to be very credible.
A republican doesnt have much of a chance in the 14th congressional district because it is a corrupt, liberal district. Hey, at least he ran.
Do you think that maybe the people over at Navyseals.com agree with Chad Miles and that is why they printed it??? Hmmmmm
I wonder if Pat Robertson knows why God is punishing Alabama with tornadoes.
Any thoughts on that , Dan?
Because I can’t say it any better:
Hmm, so John Edwards, married for a few decades (and you can tell it’s a real marriage, not a Malcolm Forbes marriage), has several kids, and is drooled over by quite a few females, is being called gay by Ann Coulter, approaching 50, never married, “dated” Dinesh D’Souza!!! (cough) and has an Adam’s Apple bigger than Lurch on the Addams Family. Oooookay.
http://wonkette.com/politics/a.....p#c1045476
NavySeals.com
“Not an official site of the US Navy, NavySEALs.com offers many recruiting features as well as community forums frequented by Navy SEALs and Special Operators.”
Editorial Staff
No military experience
Military veteran, however, unable to verify participation in any particular operation. Went into corporate security after completion of initial tour.
No military experience
Sorry, I’m not terribly impressed with “NavySeals.com” Looks like a bunch of wannabes. I’m not sure that I would want to be around these guys if they went into a bar full of real Navy Seals. The real ones get very annoyed with fakes.
For some real fun, find the WHOIS entry on navyseals.com, and see what other sites show up with the same info:
http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.a.....id=godaddy
http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.a.....id=godaddy
http://www.ustactical.com
What do you know, the kind of company that sells shit to weirdos who think they need military gear.
At least he does it in his own name (Mark Divine), rather than borrowing someone elses name.
Aaron:
Oh, jeez. Serious wannabes.
No, I’m sure that I don’t want to be anywhere near the “NavySeals.com” boys when they run into a bunch of real Navy Seals.
Not so much because I’d be afraid of getting hurt. I know enough real Seals to know that they’re a pretty accurate bunch. They only hit what they’re aiming at.
I just don’t want to be a witness.
Ann Coulter is a freak, and I don’t mean that in a good way. All that bile that flows from her, and Bill Maher says he’d fuck her? I thought he’d have better taste than that, but then again ol’ Bill (who has two strikes against him in my book for being a supporter the the ecoterrorists otherwise known as PETA) has a permanent case of beer goggles…..
This whole affair reminds me of a quote I read from Andrew Sullivan’s blog (not his words, though), though this isn’t quite exact:
“Unless something good happens in Iraq, and soon, the Risen Christ Himself wouldn’t beat Al Sharpton.”
Say what you will about Andrew (he’s one of the few intelligent conservatives left out there, though most conservatives no longer consider him as such), but that quote has got to make you feel good about the state of the Recraplican mindset.
32, 33
Chad Miles is a hell of lot more believable than any of the crap you two libs can dig up. Anyone who honestly believes that the majority of the military doesnt support the war is a moonbat.
I would believe navyseals.com before I would ever trust See BS (proven liars and forgerers) any day.
@7 Coulter didn’t serve in the military. Did you?
I remember reading somewhere (Time magazine?) Coulter’s response to a reporter’s question about whether she was afraid of assassination (apparently she is), and Coulter’s response basically was that she hides behind big, brawny Republican males.
Now ain’t that just like a Republican bitch? Big talk, no walk, after offending people she goes and hides behind bodyguards. Blackwater was created for people like her.
@12 “Veterans groups, previously supportive of the Bush administration, are coming to see how little the loyalty and sacrifice of our brave men and women is valued by people who have not served, and will not serve. Many currently serving have already figured that out.”
ACtually, this is not new. Remember the photo of a VFW guy that wingnuts circulated with this caption?
“Bill Moyer, 73, wears a ‘Bullshit Protector’ flap over his ear while Senator Ted Kennedy addresses the Veterans of Foreign Wars?”
The irony is that, while the photo is a real Associated Press news photo, the REAL caption was:
“Bill Moyer, 73, wears a ‘Bullshit Protector’ flap over his ear while President George W. Bush, on screen at rear, addresses the Veterans of Foreign Wars at their 106th convention on Monday, Aug. 22, 2005, at Salt Lake City. Moyer served in Korea and Vietnam, and in the post-WWII occupation of Germany.”
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/earflap.asp
This incident, more starkly than almost any other, irrefutably proves what shameless LIARS rightwingers are. Unfortunately, there are still people who believe the bullshit that daily spews from the rightwing propaganda machine.
Disseminating that propaganda, of course, is very expensive and the guys who literally shell out BILLIONS to plant rightwing lies in the public mind aren’t doing it as a hobby or for personal gratification. They are doing it because they stand to make unimaginable sums of money from the GOP’s policies of economic fascism, and will do literally anything — no matter how evil or dishonest — to keep Republicons in power. All the wannabes who think these rich bastards have any intention of sharing the loot with THEM are totally delusional — they will be exploited as cheap labor and as consumers of dangerous and defective products along with the rest of us.
I’m sorry I missed hour 2, it would have been fun, but I was at a concert, and that was also totally fun. So far neither of them responded to the letter.
@12 I predict the Walter Reed scandal will be a watershed event for Bush and the conservative movement like Katrina was. This is a breaking-of-faith moment so fundamental and gut-wrenching that its cost to the GOP will be incalculable. I think this will be remembered as the moment when the Republican Party lost Main Street.
@19 Bullshit! Truth is, it’s illegal to conduct political polls of the troops, so no one knows how they vote.
@20 “Real cunt, no?”
No. Surgical artifice.
@22 Here is something for YOU, Dan Rather: National Defense Committee is a rightwing website, and Chad Miles is a (badly) defeated Republican candidate for Congress. Miles is a wingnut whackjob who got 15% of the vote against John Conyers. You don’t have to take MY word for it; you can look it up. http://miboecfr.nictusa.com/el.....14000.html
“Rather” posted this same bullshit a couple days ago, and I debunked it then, and I’ll keep debunking this bullshit every time he reposts it.
Sure the National Defense Committee is a “nonprofit organization.” So what? That means nothing. The Democratic Party is a “nonprofit organization,” too. So is the Republican Party. All this term means is they fall under a particular set of IRS regulations.
“Nonprofit organization” sure as hell does NOT mean a group isn’t a bunch of liars with a partisan axe to grind. And I’m NOT referring here to the Democratic Party. You know who I mean.
@27 “A republican doesnt have much of a chance in the 14th congressional district because it is a corrupt, liberal district.”
Hmmm, well, that’s ALWAYS the rightwing comeback when their candidate takes a shellacking on the order of 85% to 15%, isn’t it?
Rather is the kind of guy who would argue that Low Tax Looper got beat, 96% to 4%, by a Democratic write-in candidate because he ran in a corrupt, liberal district. And HE wants to tutor US about credibility? He should start with his own.
HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
Wingnut liars are so transparent, kicking wingnut ass is fun & easy!!
Conservatives expressed exasperation. “I have never seen an administration with such an enormous gulf between the president’s public statements and its actions,” said Michael A. Ledeen, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. “Presidential statements should reflect policy. They don’t seem to in this administration.”
Looks like Bush was before the war before he was against it! HE HE!
http://www.callingallwingnuts......hese-guys/
This shows you what the Publican party really thinks about blacks.
re 25: Well, I guess we can thank Richard Nixon for normalizing relations with mainland China.
Chiang kai Shek must beturning over in his grave.
re 41: Yes, Roger. This will be as bad for the Bushistas as when Main Street America found out that Nixon used foul language.
They would tolerate anything except the words “fuck” and “shit”being used by the president. A man who talks like that or gets a freebie bj is going to get himself impeached.
To the Asshole at 7
Please list list your service record.
John Barelli and I made careers out of serice to this country.
When you list your military record, being a Boy Scout does not count.
Where is everyone that wants to pay for this war? Let the soldier and soldier families sacrifice while we run our mouths and have a grand ole time. Let me have another tax break. Let the soldier die, but lets make sure they have a nice place to rehab, unless we have to pay for it out of own pockets – put that on the credit card too.
Hey Loocie While you at it read this:
http://www.suntimes.com/news/s.....04.article
“And, in fact, in the Reverend Al’s case it’s even better than that. Al buys his carbon offsets from Generation Investment Management LLP, which is “an independent, private, owner-managed partnership established in 2004 and with offices in London and Washington, D.C.,” that, for a fee, will invest your money in “high-quality companies at attractive prices that will deliver superior long-term investment returns.” Generation is a tax-exempt U.S. 501(c)3. And who’s the chairman and founding partner? Al Gore.
So Al can buy his carbon offsets from himself. Better yet, he can buy them with the money he gets from his long-time relationship with Occidental Petroleum. See how easy it is to be carbon-neutral? All you have do is own a gazillion stocks in Big Oil, start an eco-stockbroking firm to make eco-friendly investments, use a small portion of your oil company’s profits to buy some tax-deductible carbon offsets from your own investment firm, and you too can save the planet while making money and leaving a carbon footprint roughly the size of Godzilla’s at the start of the movie when they’re all standing around in the little toe wondering what the strange depression in the landscape is.”
Your moronic leader buys carbon credits from himself? Now how can I do dat… ?
Yes Clueless: Chicago Sun-Times MSM
I decided to see what was NOT covered lately by the Pee Eye or the Slimes.
Keep watching Clueless, more libtard MSM on your way.
This photo of the Mormon asshole with the aids-infested cunt Coulter will be all we need to defeat the Publican party in 08 if they run this religious nutjob who was for abortion before he was against it.
As for the dyke Coulter, she now needs FOUR bodyguards. I hope she comes to Seattle. I’ll bring SIX and then they can duke it out while I tell her what a cowardly cunt she is. When will this bitch be going to court for her vote fraud last year?
Al Gore preaches energy conservation in the face of global warming last week I and others posted AlGore lives in a Tennessee mansion that consumes more electricity in a month than the average American household uses in a year.
According to the Nashville Electric Service, the Eco-Messiah’s house uses 20 times more electricity than the average American home. The average household consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours. In 2006, the Gores wolfed down nearly 221,000 kilowatt-hours.
President Bush has drawn criticism for being insensitive about environmental issues by the Moonbat!s of King County and his “Texas White House” is a model of environmentally friendly living.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/....._n13906663
Chicago Tribune
Bush loves ecology –at home
April 29, 2001
By Rob Sullivan. Rob Sullivan is a freelance writer based in Los Angeles
The 4,000-square-foot house is a model of environmental rectitude.
Geothermal heat pumps located in a central closet circulate water through pipes buried 300 feet deep in the ground where the temperature is a constant 67 degrees; the water heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. Systems such as the one in this “eco-friendly” dwelling use about 25% of the electricity that traditional heating and cooling systems utilize.
A 25,000-gallon underground cistern collects rainwater gathered from roof runs; wastewater from sinks, toilets and showers goes into underground purifying tanks and is also funneled into the cistern. The water from the cistern is used to irrigate the landscaping surrounding the four-bedroom home. Plants and flowers native to the high prairie area blend the structure into the surrounding ecosystem.
No, this is not the home of some eccentrically wealthy eco-freak trying to shame his fellow citizens into following the pristineness of his self-righteous example. And no, it is not the wilderness retreat of the Sierra Club or the Natural Resources Defense Council, a haven where tree-huggers plot political strategy.
This is President George W. Bush’s “Texas White House” outside the small town of Crawford
According to David Heymann, the house’s architect and associate dean of the University of Texas architecture department, Heymann designed the house so that “every room has a relationship with something in the landscape that’s different from the room next door. Each of the rooms feels like a slightly different place.”
In a USA Today interview, Heymann said, “There’s a great grove of oak trees to the west that protects it from the late afternoon sun. Then there is a view out to the north looking at hills, and to the east out over a lake, and the view to the south . . . out to beautiful hills.”
Yet, the Moonbat! http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0429-03.htm – ridicules the house the 4,000-square-foot house. Yet they give Gore’s 221,000 kilowatt-hour mansion a pass. Just like a libtard!
Now that’s Inconvenient Truth!
Mr Stupid, I have it on excellent anonymous sources you emailed Ann Coulter for a date because you found blonde libtard women vacuous and shallow. After the date you tried to get into her pants so you could brag on ASSWipes how you did her! Is that how you found out what you printed in #58?
Actually, Roger, you’re almost wrong on this one. The Military Times routinely polls its readers on any number of topics.
As subscribers of the various Military Times publications tend to be career military, Their annual polls have come to be viewed by many as a barometer of the career military.
Many folks believe that these polls are somewhat skewed to the right in relation to the entire military, as not many first termers subscribe to the Military Times papers, they are considered pretty accurate when it comes to senior military officers and NCOs.
So, no, you cannot simply poll “the military”, but there are polls available that give a good indication of what career military people are thinking.
http://www.militarycity.com/polls/
Of course, the polls contradict what Mr. Rather says. He’d prefer to believe a psudo-military “wannabe” site, and articles written by a “military expert” that did one tour of duty, apparently without ever being involved in any conflict.
The guy, Chad Miles, is also now a “military expert” for Faux News, along with getting beaten in his run for the Senate that his numbers are almost as bad as your favorite Republican, Mr. Looper. I wanted to find out more, but he took down his web page, and disallowed the internet archive (Wayback Machine), so I cannot find out much more about him.
Still, at least the guy apparently finished his time in the military, and didn’t skip out on his duties. That puts him way ahead of some Republican politicians we all know.
So tell me all you eco-nuts; how does one buy energy credits from themself? Oh…, if you are rich and famous libtards you can. I bet Babawawa Streisand called Gore and asked how can she do the same on her 11,000 sq ft mansion!
Yet if a “neocon” tried that you ASSWipes would be all over him.
Horse Whisperer would come out fo the closet and compare him to Mike Brown.
Headlice/Harry Poon/Colonel Biff/Blackhead would ask to meet him at the Cheesecake Factory.
Left Turn/RightEqualsStupid would claim to have sex with all his female family members. Would also claim his daughters pulled a train.
Voice of Chalk Scratching would search high and low for some libtard site to post innuendos from.
Carl Grossman would throw in some FYs for good measure.
Furball the Pellethead would post over and over and over how he debunked the facts found in libtard MSM accounts.
GBS would take the person to the woodshed.
John Barelli would claim they needed help to get those credits approved.
Froggy wouldn’t know what to say. He’d mimic someone else here.
Nuff SAID!
Does any libtard here read Katie Couric’s blog?
Katie in her blog wrote this after AlGore “won” his “Oscar”
“As the throngs of celebrities greeted Al Gore as a secular saint, I wondered if this might usher in a backlash against environmentalists . . .
“Gore has repeatedly said the environment is not a Democratic or Republican issue; it’s a moral issue. But now that Hollywood has so completely embraced the former vice president, one wonders if this issue will be associated only with liberal causes.”
Hmmm… maybe Katic is so vacuous after all! Maybe she understands the contempt most Americans have for the “do as I say not as I do” hollyweird elites!
PUDDYBUD: GRASPING AT STRAWS. SO PATHETIC LIKE HIS BANKRUPT IDEOLOGY.
Hey Libtards of the Northwest Division of Scratchy Voice ASSWipes, why not determine your Carbon Footprint:
http://www.carbonfootprint.com/
Scratchy Voice can create an SQL table. Moonbat!s can enter their vaules on the table.
Scratchy Voice: You do know the SQL Command – CREATE TABLE, right?
Aww Poor Clueless, nothing on the Daily Kos or Media Matters web site today?
What is it now Day 245 visiting them first thing in the morning after your wife had another unsatisfying night with ya? Maybe Mr Stupid can help your wife. He claims he’s always available!
Remember the post of Mr Stupid in the mask visiting Mrs Clueless, the “Madam”?
Clueless: More libtard MSM for you to chew your cud on:
http://www.boston.com/news/nat.....inton_run/
“President Clinton’s pardons have been a political issue for Hillary Clinton because of her ties to a number of the cases. In addition to the people who paid her brothers, those receiving pardons included commodities trader Marc Rich, a fugitive who was prosecuted for tax evasion by then-US Attorney Rudolph Giuliani and fled to Switzerland. Rich was pardoned after his former wife, Denise Rich, contributed heavily to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign.”
Now this can get really juicy! But I wonder why was this only found in the Boston Globe? Since the NY Slimes and the Globe are owned by the same company why not in other papers?Does the Globe want Kerry Round Two?
Mr Stupid: You love to post crap from MSNBC. Well, I went there too and what did I find? Something Mr Barelli must not like too much in his argument with me that Hilary is her own person. She calls in Bill to help her get the black vote from Obama.
Why is that John? She can’t do it herself? Is it because blakcs can’t emotionally attach themselves to Hilary? Rich white well to do goil from prominent family? Goes to exclusive college and writes fawningly about Saul Alinsky in her senior thesis? Marries a Rhodes Scholar? Hmmm…?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17417015/
Wow I write about Hilary, blacks, and Bill Clinton from msnbc and the filter eats it.
Well I have it saved just in case Scratchy Voice tries to trash it.
Now Clueless, why did Hilary do that?
http://www.siliconvalley.com/m.....ews_nation
“Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Clinton have operated a family charity since 2001, but she failed to list it on annual Senate financial disclosure reports on five occasions.
The Ethics in Government Act requires members of Congress to disclose positions they hold with any outside entity, including non-profit foundations. Hillary Clinton has served her family foundation as treasurer and secretary since it was established in December 2001, but none of her ethics reports since then have disclosed that fact.
The foundation has enabled the Clintons to write off at least $5 million from their taxable personal income since 2001, while dispensing $1.25 million in charitable contributions over that period.”
Later they claim it was an oversight? An OVERSIGHT? Poppycock! The “smartest woman in the world” has oversights?
I bet when they start investigating those writeoffs they’ll find some more of Bill’s used underwear and probably some condoms to boot!
I was listening to Larry Kudlow on CNBC after the 3% sell off earlier this week. He said something profound about Headlice’s favorite economist Paul Krugman.
So I Googled it: “Larry Kudlow Paul Krugman recession”.
Paul Krugman – what a jerk!
Scratchy Voice maybe that’s a topic for tonight. “Who’s right Larry or Paul – You decide!” But then again Scratchy Voice would have to admit Puddy is onto something here.
Thanks “Goldy” for releasing #72.
HEY PUDDYBUD. WAKE UP. HARDLY ANYONE HERE SUPPORTS HILLARY FOR PREZ. IT’S BEEN THERE DONE THAT.
HOWEVER SHE’D BE A DAMN SIGHT BETTER THAN THE CHIMPANZEE YOU WORSHIP AND VOTED TWICE FOR WHOSE NUMBERS ARE STUCK AT 30 PERCENT AND DIP INTO THE 20’S.
OBAMA! OBAMA! OBAMA!
NOTHING SCARES PUDDYBUD MORE THAN THE FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN PREZ BEING A DEM.
KEN BLACKWELL – WHAT HAPPENED? MIKE STEELE – WHAT HAPPENED?
LMAO!!!!
Clueless: Many libtards who visit here support Hilary. Senators Patty the Brain and Maria the ??? support Hilary. You and I both know it.
I am ambivolent about Obama right now! I have many black conservative friends who like Obama. Pacman told GBS he likes Obama. I would like to see Condi jump in but she’s been fawning over Obama lately!
Hey Clueless: Your doorbell is ringing. I think Mr Stupid is making a visit! Did you put a chain around the wife like the new soon to be released Samuel Jackson – Christini Ricci movie Black Snake Moan?
Man there’s double entendre’s just in the movie title. Don’t you wish you had the black snake to make your wife moan so Mr Stupid wouldn’t have to make house calls?
So Clueless, nary a peep over the energy wasting Gore House and the energy couscious efficient house Bush house. Why is that? Truth hurting that libtard mind?
Clueless I don’t make fun of blacks who lose in politics. Otherwise I could start with Harold Ford, Carl McCall, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Kweisi Mfume, etc. Blacks just kicked to the curb by the racism of libtards led my Howard Screech Dean.
Can ya dig it?
PUDDYBUD: IT’S NATURAL PATTY AND MARIA WOULD SUPPORT HILARY. BILL AND HILARY KNOW HOW TO WIN – IT’S THEIR TRACK RECORD.
I DON’T SUPPORT HILARY. SO LET’S TAKE A POLL. HOW MANY LIB COMMENTERS HERE SUPPORT HILARY? I’M SURE ALL OF US WOULD VOTE FOR HER IF SHE WAS THE NOMINEE. OVER FLIPPERS AND PANDERERS MCCAIN AND ROMNEY? ABSOLUTELY. OVER ANYONE SUPPORTED BY ROVE? ABSOLUTELY.
BUT I DON’T THINK SHE’S ANYONE’S FIRST CHOICE.
MY FIRST CHOICE IS OBAMA. WE DESPERATELY NEED TO GET OVER SKIN COLOR IN THIS COUNTRY. A BLACK PREZ WILL DO THAT BETTER THAN JUST ABOUT ANYTHING BUT NO FREAKING WAY WILL I SUPPORT HIM IF HE’S FRIENDLY TO THE NEO-CON AGENDA ON FOREIGN POLICY.
HEY PUDDYBUD – GORE BUYS GREEN POWER. HE CAN USE ALL HE WANTS AS LONG AS IT DOESN’T COME FROM COAL.
THERE’S NO GREEN SUBSTITUTES FOR JET TRAVEL BUT BUYING OFFSETS IS HELPFUL.
BUSH IS GREEN ON HIS RANCH? TERRIFIC. BEATS RONNIE RAYGUN WHO TOOK THE SOLAR PANELS OFF THE WHITE HOUSE. I’M A PROGRESSIVE. I CAN ACKNOWLEDGE PROGRESS. BUT THAT DOESN’T GIVE HIM A PASS FOR TANKING ON KYOTO AND FLIPPING ON HIS CAMPAIGN ASSURANCES.
CONDI? NO FREAKING WAY. SHE WOULD BE ROVE’S CANDIDATE FOR SURE. NEO-CON AND FOSSIL FUEL AGENDA DOWN THE LINE.
PUDDYBUD MAKE ALL THE STUPID JOKES YOU WANT ABOUT MY WIFE. I’LL RESTRICT MYSELF TO THE ONE ABOUT THE ROLLING PIN. SHE SHOULD SHE KNOCK YOU OVER THE HEAD FOR HANGING OUT WITH US “SICKOS”.
LMAO!! THE SAME “SICKOS” WHO’VE BEEN ON A WINNING STREAK SINCE NOV 2004.
I DON’T SUPPORT A LOT OF RIGHTEQUALSSTUPID’S TACTICS BUT I SURE LOVE THE STORIES HE DIGS UP ABOUT THE CROOKED POLITICIANS YOU WORSHIP GOING TO JAIL!!!
Clueless: When China and India support Kyoto, then I will support the US signing!
Clueless: Everyone of the crooked people, I have already said need to go. I asked about your claims over Karl Rove and Tom DeLay. What happened Clueless.
You don’t support a lot lof Mr Stupid’s tactics? Well I’ve only seen Mr Barelli take him “to the woodshed”. Nary a peep from you Clueless.
BTW Why did you change your name?
Clueless: I make jokes about Mr Stupid and your wife so you can understand how inane and stupid Mr Stupid is. I’m glad he’s on your side!
Notice when I and others identified Mr ACLU hyphen name, the child porn viewer, he shut up for a good while. We can find others by why stoop there?
I TOLD R.E.S. THAT LIBERAL CHRISTIANS ARE WELCOME IN MY DEMOCRATIC PARTY EVEN IF I DISAGREE WITH THEM ON SOME THINGS. HELL CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS ARE WELCOME TOO AS LONG AS WE’RE UNITED AGAINST THE CROOKED MASTERS OF THE PARTY YOU WORSHIP I’M FINE WITH IT. DIG IT UP. YOU’RE ALWAYS BRAGGING YOUR ABOUT YOUR GOOGLE SKILLS.
CHINA AND INDIA TOGETHER DON’T EMIT NEARLY AS MUCH GHG AS THE U.S AND THE REST OF THE INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES. THEY ARE STILL POOR COUNTRIES. I SAY WE GO CARBON NEUTRAL/NEGATIVE AND SELL THEM THE MEANS TO DO SO ON THE CHEAP. CARROTS AND GENTLE STICKS – IT’S THAT SIMPLE.
FIND ALL THE LAWBREAKERS YOU WANT PUDDY. THEY BELONG IN JAIL NOT IN MY PARTY. I BET YOU CAN’T SAY THE SAME FOR TOBIN, NEY, CUNNINGHAM, ABRAMOFF – OR MAYBE YOU CAN – GRUDGINGLY.
HEY PUDDY – I HEAR TED HAGGARD’S BEEN “DE-GAYED”. MAYBE AFTER HIS TREATMENT, HE’S BACK TO TALKING TO THE CHIMP ONCE A WEEK. GIVE HIM A SHOUT-OUT NEXT TIME YOU’RE IN CO SPRINGS VISITING YOUR ANTI-SEMITIC PEEPS WHO ACCUSE JEWS OF KILLING JESUS AT THE AIR FORCE ACADEMY.
OH EXCUSE ME – THAT WAS MWS! I GET YOU TWO MIXED UP ALL THE TIME.
LMAO!!!
Clueless: Before I Google anything you still haven’t answered my question. Why did you drop “For the Clueless” or “Clueless” as we called you? MWS posted for months with impunity. MWS was only outed by Scratchy Voice. I figured out who you were in two weeks.
So I can Google your statements which I remember last week or I can wait until you answer my question!
Be truthful for once in your life Clueless or still YOS LIB BRO!
So Clueless, while mulling your answer on #90, if Hilary is “such a winner” why are you and your ASSWipe “friends” backing Obama, an unproven commodity? I can’t understand libtards. Why give up on a “proven” winner?
Clueless while still mulling over your “answer” on #90, you have no problem with Gore paying himself for his “green” credits?
Waaaaaa haaaaa haaaaaa HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR!
Nuff SAID!
Clueless while still still mulling over your answer to #90, YOU SIDE SAID “No one can be de-gayed”. So what’s up with that comment?
Be truthful for once in your life
OH I JUST CAN’T WAIT TO FOLLOW YOUR EXAMPLE PUDDYBUD. I MEAN YOU’RE JUST THE MAN OF VIRTUE.
GORE IS DOING THE WORLD A LOAD OF GOOD BY CALLING ATTENTION TO GLOBAL WARMING. THAT’S ALL I NEED FROM HIM. IT WOULD TAKE HIM OWNING A COAL COMPANY, HEATING HIS HOUSE WITH COAL OR RUNNING HIS CAR AND HIS JET ON COAL TO ALIENATE ME. COAL IS THE ENEMY. IF THE WORLD JUST FOCUSED ON COAL AND SUBSTITUTED IT OUT FOR ANYTHING – NUKE, SOLAR, WIND, OR A COMBO – WE COULD BURN ALL THE OIL AND GAS WE WANT AND WOULDN’T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING. THAT’S A FACT.
YOU LOSERS THINK AMERICANS WILL HAVE TO SACRIFICE OR DO WITHOUT. THAT’S BULLSHIT. PUTTING IN A MORE EFFICIENT LIGHTBULB OR INSULATING YOUR HOUSE IS NOT SACRIFICING. BUYING A HYBRID OR HIGHER EFFICIENCY VEHICLE IS NOT DOING WITHOUT – IT’S GETS YOU FROM POINT A TO POINT B JUST THE SAME.
AND OBAMA? YOU THINK YOUR CHIMPANZEE WAS QUALIFIED TO RUN THIS COUNTRY? AT THIS POINT I’D TRUST ANY CANDIDATE ON THE DEM SIDE. REPUBLICANS ARE COMPLETELY IN THRALL TO THE ROVE CROWD.
NO-ONE CAN BE DE-GAYED? I GUESS MIRACLES CAN HAPPEN. WE’LL SEE PUDDYBUD IF HAGGARD’S FLOCK BUYS IT. MAYBE YOU CAN PERFORM SOME “DE-HATE” MAGIC ON YOUR ANTI-SEMITIC PEEPS AT THE AIR FORCE ACADEMY. AGAIN, MIRACLES CAN HAPPEN.
Bulletin to YO’S LIBERAL BROTHER: PudSucker works at a civil service job. . .Probably hired off a plus hiring quota to get the job. I doubt he would qualify through an open competitive register.
This wingnut liar has stated that he could not fullfil military service due to a physical injury (knee) which washed him out. His current employment has much higher physical standards than the military.
‘Nuff said.
Ahhh yes Froggy. You claimed to be a Vietnam Vet. What did you do, KP?
If you only knew what I did for a living Froggy. Wait… I told you all what I did. Find it. Believe me it ain’t civil service, although I have to deal with those types a lot.
You were invited to the meeting last month Froggy. Does a greater 6′ black man scare you Froggy?
I am Republican – I lie, steal and cheat when I’m not being a family man (fat whore) or a crying hypocrit. So out of touch I have to start adopting the philosophy of my enemies just to stay in the race. Self rightgeous bastard that I am, I got my head buried in the sand like an ostrich. Dumb bird, mine as well make it my mascot. Hail Hitler!
Clueless: Just answer the question. Why did you change your name? Is it too hard for your two celled organism called your brain?
If I knew how to fight a war, it could of saved me the time of scratching my ass all day.
Notice everyone, Clueless did not answer the Al Gore buying credits from himself.
Clueless your side claims no one can be de-gayed. SO how can you make that claim. You are dissing your buds! A real specious argument!
HEY PUDDY CHECK OUT THE QUALITY OF HAGGARD’S “DE-GAY” TREATMENT NEXT TIME YOU’RE IN CO SPRINGS. WHO KNOWS MAYBE ROVE CAN ENROLL FOLEY IN THAT SAME PROGRAM BASED ON YOUR SAY-SO.
THEN FOLEY CAN GET BACK HIS SEAT AND EVERYTHING WILL BE ALL HUNKY-DORY IN WINGNUT LAND!
LMAO!!!
SO how can you make that claim.
I REPORT (WHAT THEY SAY).
YOU DECIDE!
Clueless, just won’t answer the question. Why did you change your nick? The wife is still Mrs Clueless!
Is it true that Puffybutt was on NBC tonight trying to have sex with a 14 year old boy? Is it true it was his own son? His wife says so.