Last week’s contest was won by milwhcky. It was Birmingham, Alabama.
This week’s is somewhere in Washington state, good luck!
by Lee — ,
Last week’s contest was won by milwhcky. It was Birmingham, Alabama.
This week’s is somewhere in Washington state, good luck!
by Goldy — ,
[HA Bible Study is on hiatus through the November election as we honor Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney by studying the scriptures of his Mormon religion.]
Doctrine and Covenants 38:32
Wherefore, for this cause I gave unto you the commandment that ye should go to the Ohio; and there I will give unto you my law; and there you shall be endowed with power from on high;
Discuss.
by Darryl — ,
Dear Person who left this in my yard:
It’s gone now…got in the way while I was raking.
But before you put up a new one, please have the courtesy to fill out the application in the box by the door. Please print legibly, and pay particular attention the the section labeled, “Next of Kin.”
Love and Kisses,
—Darryl
by Darryl — ,
Jon does Barack.
Mark Fiore: microtargetting undecideds.
Sam Seder with a new edition of Random Rush.
The Candidates Have Dinner Together:
Sam Seder: Breaking down Benghazi; the G.O.P.’s scandalquest.
White House: West Wing Week.
Newsy: Another appeal’s court finds DOMA unconstitutional.
Sam Seder: FAUX and Fiends lose their minds over BASIC MATH.
Obama: Commit to vote.
Pap: The continuing G.O.P. war on voting.
Willard (and friends):
Maddow: Maricopa County Elections puts wrong election date on form—in Spanish only.
Sam Seder: Federal Appeals Court rules DOMA unconstitutional.
Jennifer Granholm: Debunking conservative myths—what your Republican uncle needs to know.
Liberal Viewer: FAUX News or CNN less biased on Romney politicizing death of ex-SEAL.
SlateTV: The Boss is back!
Maddow: Party differences apparent in donor list.
Debate, Town Hall Style:
Young Turks: “Lowlife Scumbag”…Congressional debate gets heated.
John Fugelsang: The week in amnesia—a tale of two 9/11s:
Mitchell and Maddow: Obama touts advocacy for women.
Thom with The Good, The Bad, and the Very, Very Ugly.
Jennifer Granholm: Issa’s sensitive document dump jeoporadizes security.
Sam Seder: Rep. Joe Walsh opens up new front on the War on Women™.
Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.
by Carl Ballard — ,
I’m not a fan of our nonpartisan election system here in Washington where we don’t have to register by party to vote in the primary. But I had thought when the national scandal about GOP operatives dumping voter registrations.
A campaign worker linked to a controversial Republican consulting firm has been arrested in Virginia and charged with throwing voter registration forms into a dumpster.
The suspect, Colin Small, 31, was described by a local law enforcement official as a “supervisor” in a Republican Party financed operation to register voters in Rockingham County in rural Virginia, a key swing state in the Nov. 6 election. He was arrested after a local business owner in the same Harrisonburg, Va., shopping center where the local GOP campaign headquarters is located spotted Small tossing a bag into the trash, according to a statement Thursday by the Rockingham County Sheriff’s office. The bag was later found to contain eight voter registration forms, it said. The arrest was reported Thursday night by WWBT-TV in Richmond.
But maybe not as tough as I’d thought.
In Virginia, where the Pennsylvania man working for the state GOP was arrested Thursday, Chesterfield County’s General Registrar Larry Haake was seen explaining to Richmond’s CBS 6 in late September that he had received complaints of Strategic employees discovered doing the same thing in a library last month.
“They were responsible for people that appeared in some libraries in Chesterfield County, supposedly to conduct voter registration drives,” Haake said, “but they were asking voters for whom they are going to vote.”
Haake says he informed the GOP of the incident at the time, but, apparently, no action was taken.
If, in fact, Small, or the workers he is said to have supervised, were using the same technique of misrepresenting themselves to voters about being a pollster, rather than being a registration worker, it’s likely he would have been able to glean whether those registrations he was allegedly seen tossing into a dumpster were for Democratic or Republican-leaning voters.
I think this is what you get when people keep screaming ACORN, ACORN, ACORN. They think they’re just leveling the playing field.
by Carl Ballard — ,
That Seattle Times staffers are upset about The Seattle Times giving Rob McKenna free advertising. But honestly, this would be a lot more meaningful if the newsroom felt like it had stood up to Frank Blethen on newsroom issues.
It threatens the two things we value the most, the traits that make The Seattle Times a strong brand: Our independence and credibility.
Ultimately, The Seattle Times’ independence and credibility are harmed more by, for example, Truth Needle segments that say things that are true are false if Democrats say them and ignoring things GOP candidates says that aren’t right. The newsroom has an obligation to independence and credibility. They’d be better able to withstand any fallout from their publisher being in the bag for McKenna if their paper hadn’t been in the bag for him and much of the GOP.
When the paper reads like a free ad for a certain type of GOP elected official, it’s tough to complain that there’s a free ad for a certain type of GOP elected official.
by Carl Ballard — ,
– This story about puppy mills in Lewis County will break your heart.
– The Burden of a Black President
– Charming people watching the previous debate.
– I love this XKCD piece on presidential election conventional wisdom.
by Darryl — ,
Obama | Romney |
96.7% probability of winning | 3.3% probability of winning |
Mean of 300 electoral votes | Mean of 238 electoral votes |
Our previous analysis had seen President Barack Obama slip a little but more, although he still led Gov. Mitt Romney by a mean of 288 to 250 electoral votes. The analysis further concluded that Obama would only have an 86.5% probability of winning an election now; Romney was at a 13.5% probability of winning.
Some new polls have arrived.
Some comments on polls: First, there were a boatload of polls released by YouGov on Tuesday. If you are an Obama fan, they look pretty encouraging. Alas, I will not be including them in my analysis, as they are on-line polls. For the same reason, I will not include this Zogby poll in Florida showing Obama up +3%.
Second, there is a new New Jersey poll from Neighborhood Research on behalf of Americans for Prosperity released yesterday. It shows Obama with a +7% lead in New Jersey.
I was very tempted to totally ignore a poll from a David Koch group formed out of the Tea Party movement. But the methods section points out that:
This poll was commissioned as a public service to provide citizens with information related to public policy.
Call me a sucker, call me a fool, but until someone can show me that this was a selectively released or intentionally biased poll, I’ll follow my rules and include it.
start | end | sample | % | % | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
st | poll | date | date | size | MOE | O | R | diff |
CO | PPP | 16-Oct | 18-Oct | 1000 | 3.1 | 50 | 47 | O+3 |
CO | Grove Insight | 15-Oct | 16-Oct | 500 | 4.4 | 47 | 44 | O+3 |
CO | WeAskAmerica | 15-Oct | 15-Oct | 1206 | 2.9 | 47.0 | 48.1 | R+1.1 |
CT | PPP | 15-Oct | 16-Oct | 1015 | 3.1 | 53 | 44 | O+9 |
CT | U CT | 11-Oct | 16-Oct | 574 | 4.0 | 51 | 37 | O+14 |
CT | Siena | 04-Oct | 14-Oct | 552 | 4.2 | 53 | 38 | O+15 |
IN | Rasmussen | 10-Oct | 11-Oct | 600 | 4.0 | 41 | 54 | R+13 |
IA | Marist | 15-Oct | 17-Oct | 1137 | 2.9 | 51 | 43 | O+8 |
IA | WeAskAmerica | 15-Oct | 15-Oct | 1499 | 2.6 | 48.7 | 45.9 | O+2.8 |
MA | PPP | 15-Oct | 16-Oct | 709 | 3.7 | 57 | 39 | O+18 |
MA | Rasmussen | 10-Oct | 10-Oct | 500 | 4.5 | 57 | 42 | O+15 |
MI | EPIC/MRA | 17-Oct | 17-Oct | 800 | 3.5 | 52 | 46 | O+6 |
MI | Denno Research | 11-Oct | 11-Oct | 500 | 4.5 | 44.2 | 40.5 | O+3.7 |
MN | SurveyUSA | 12-Oct | 14-Oct | 550 | 4.3 | 50 | 40 | O+10 |
MT | PPP | 15-Oct | 16-Oct | 806 | 3.5 | 43 | 53 | R+10 |
MT | Rasmussen | 14-Oct | 14-Oct | 500 | 4.5 | 45 | 53 | R+8 |
NV | Grove Insight | 15-Oct | 16-Oct | 500 | 4.4 | 50 | 43 | O+7 |
NV | Rasmussen | 15-Oct | 15-Oct | 500 | 4.5 | 50 | 47 | O+3 |
NV | SurveyUSA | 11-Oct | 15-Oct | 806 | 3.5 | 48 | 45 | O+3 |
NH | Rasmussen | 15-Oct | 15-Oct | 500 | 4.5 | 50 | 49 | O+1 |
NH | Suffolk | 12-Oct | 14-Oct | 500 | 4.4 | 46.8 | 47.2 | R+0.4 |
NJ | Neighborhood Research | 10-Oct | 14-Oct | 783 | 3.5 | 48.4 | 41.4 | O+7.0 |
NJ | Quinnipiac | 10-Oct | 14-Oct | 1319 | 2.7 | 51 | 43 | O+8 |
NC | Rasmussen | 17-Oct | 17-Oct | 500 | 4.5 | 46 | 52 | R+6 |
OH | Rasmussen | 17-Oct | 17-Oct | 750 | 4.0 | 49 | 48 | O+1 |
OH | SurveyUSA | 12-Oct | 15-Oct | 613 | 4.0 | 45.4 | 42.4 | O+2.9 |
PA | Quinnipiac | 12-Oct | 14-Oct | 1519 | 2.5 | 50 | 46 | O+4 |
PA | Susquehanna | 11-Oct | 13-Oct | 1376 | — | 45 | 49 | R+4 |
WA | PPP | 15-Oct | 16-Oct | 574 | — | 50 | 45 | O+5 |
WA | Rasmussen | 14-Oct | 14-Oct | 500 | 4.5 | 55 | 42 | O+13 |
WA | SurveyUSA | 12-Oct | 14-Oct | 543 | 4.3 | 54 | 40 | O+14 |
WA | Washington Poll | 01-Oct | 16-Oct | 644 | 3.9 | 51.9 | 42.9 | O+9.0 |
WI | Marist | 15-Oct | 17-Oct | 1013 | 3.1 | 51 | 45 | O+6 |
WI | Marquette | 11-Oct | 14-Oct | 870 | 3.4 | 48.5 | 48.1 | O+0.5 |
Just a couple of weeks ago, Romney seemed on the road to building a solid lead in Colorado. Today, Obama has a +3% in two new polls, and Romney gets a +1.1% lead in another. But with nine current polls (and 5 of them in Obama’s favor), Obama ends up winning 71% of the elections in the state:
Two new polls in Iowa go to Obama, on by a remarkable +8% and the other one by an unremarkable +2.8%. Romney leads in none of the four current polls and the analysis suggests Obama would take the state with a 96% probability.
We also get two new Michigan polls. One has Obama up by a middling +6% and the other by an unimpressive +3.7%. Still, Obama takes all seven current polls, and Romney has not led in the past 20 polls…dating back to August. Obama is at a 99% probability of taking the state in an election now.
Two new Montana polls verify that Romney really does have a high single-digit lead. Romney is at 100% in the state.
Three Nevada polls all go to Obama by mid-single digits. Aside from one tie, Obama has led in the seven current polls. The polling trend seems to show Obama’s lead growing again and almost reaching his mid-September high:
New Hampshire flipped from Obama to Romney after the first debate. Now we may be seeing it just starting to flop back. Obama takes one of two new polls, but still lags Romney in our current polls. Based on these polls, Romney would win with a 64% probability an election held now.
Romney seem to be hanging on to his lead in North Carolina with help of this new +6%. Romney takes all five of the current polls, and would be almost certain to win the state right now:
Two new polls in Ohio both go to Obama, but by pretty small margins (+1% and +2.9%). Even so, Obama has eight of twelve current polls and his series of small leads provide evidence he would win the state in an election now with an 87% probability:
The biggest surprise of this batch of polls is that Mitt Romney finally takes the lead in one Pennsylvania poll. But, Obama leads by an equal amount in the other Pennsylvania poll, and one that is slightly larger (and newer). Overall, Obama takes seven of eight current polls, but the new one knocks Obama down to only a 92% probability of winning the state now.
Four new Washington polls give Obama leads from +5% to +14%. Combining the four current polls suggest Obama would win Washington with a probability of 100% by about +10%.
Two new Wisconsin polls both go to Obama, although one by a tiny margin. Still, with Obama up in all six current polls, it earns him a 95% probability of taking the state.
Now, 100,000 simulated elections later, Obama wins 96,710 times and Romney wins 3,290 times (and Romney gets the 414 ties out of this, too). Obama receives (on average) 300 (+12) to Romney’s 238 (-12) electoral votes. The Monte Carlo analysis suggests that, if the election was today, Obama would have a 96.7% (+10.2%) probability of winning and Romney would have a 3.3% (-10.2%) probability of winning.
You could say that the past three days have not been good polling days for Romney. It is always dangerous to call a trend after a single analysis, but it look like the previous analysis marked Romney’s high water mark, about the same he achieved after the Republican convention.
This can be seen from a series of elections simulated every seven days using polls from 18 Oct 2011 to 18 Oct 2012, and including polls from the preceding 14 days (FAQ). See the little upward blip?
The same upward blip can be seen in the Intrade chart of median prices that I captured this morning:
by Darryl — ,
Yes another poll has been release in the WA gubernatorial contest between former Rep. Jay Inslee and Washington AG Rob McKenna. This one is the Washington Poll. The poll surveyed 644 likely voters from October 1 to October 16.
The poll has Inslee leading McKenna by 47.1% to 46.3%. The margin of error is 3.9%. The +0.8% lead is consistent with two other recent polls. Yesterday’s PPP poll had Inslee leading by +5%. And just before that, a SurveyUSA poll had Inslee up by +3%. This new poll covers a broader, and older set of dates.
A Monte Carlo analysis using a million simulated elections, using only data from this new poll gives Inslee 555,393 wins to McKenna’s 432,729 wins. This suggests that, if the election was held now, Inslee would win with a probability of 56.2% and McKenna would win with a 43.8% probability.
Here is the distribution of election outcomes:
Given that we have three polls that are either consecutive or overlapping, lets look at what they have to jointly say about the state of this race.
The pooled set with this new poll and the PPP and SurveyUSA polls mentioned above give us a sample of 1,761 people. Of the 1,612 who had a partisan preference, 834 (47.4%) preferred Inslee and 788 (44.2%) preferred McKenna. The Monte Carlo analysis gives Inslee 835,698 wins to McKenna’s 160,205 wins.
Jointly, the polls suggest that in an election right now, Inslee would win with a 83.9% probability to McKenna’s 16.1% probability. Here is the distribution:
By standard statistical inference, Inslee’s lead isn’t quite “significant.” But the larger polling trend shows that Inslee holds a small, but consistent lead over McKenna:
Note: This post was originally written using the numbers for Registered Voters, simply because I hadn’t noticed that results for Likely Voters was available. I subsequently reanalyzed the data and rewrote the post to reflect the Likely Voter numbers. I regret the error…because, man, was that a pain in the ass!
by Darryl — ,
Over at The Stranger, Dan Savage and Goldy have teamed up to lay out the Big Case against gubernatorial candidate Rob McKenna:
Rob McKenna has been running for governor his entire adult life. And his whole electoral strategy has always relied on tricking enough King County voters—voters like you—into believing he’s not another one of those Republicans. McKenna doesn’t want you to think he’s one of those Romney/Ryan class-warfare-waging, Koch-sucking GOPers who wants to bust unions, repeal Obamacare, ban gay marriage, outlaw abortion, and unravel what remains of the social safety net, all in the service of cutting taxes on corporations and millionaires.
It is an electoral strategy that almost worked for Dino Rossi in 2004, and one that McKenna has been expertly executing for years. You may have seen those posters asking you to vote for President Obama, R-74, and Rob McKenna—McKenna opposes both President Obama and R-74—and it’s clever messaging. It is also a complete and total fucking lie. And McKenna is praying that you’re stupid enough to fall for it.
But you’re not that stupid, are you?
The piece is epic…it systematically, issue by issue, lays out the case that McKenna is NOT the politician that he has been selling to King County voters. It’s a damn fine read, too.
My guess is that, if you’ve read this far, you need no further convincing. You’ve seen the arguments before—probably right here—on each point. But you’re not like every other King County voter, because most King County voters don’t read either HorsesAss or The Stranger.
Instead, they’re reading the Seattle Times Political Action Committee. They probably haven’t a clue about the Real McKenna.
Instead, these arugula-eating, Prius-driving, war-hatin’ liberals may only be listening to KUOW and KPLU. Rob may come off as, meh, but inoffensive; they don’t see the Big Picture.
Instead they’re young, politically disengaged, voters struggling with a minimum wage jobs. They’re likely unaware of the huge stake they have in this race.
What Goldy and Dan have done is given YOU a tool: A detailed, well-written, logical, and organized portfolio of The Real McKenna.
You now have the framework to educate your family, friends and neighbors that Rob Mckenna is no Dan Evans Republican. He is much closer to a Scott Walker—just a lot smarter and more cautious.
Friends don’t let friends get fooled!
by Darryl — ,
Just yesterday, we had a Survey USA poll to analyze in the Washington state gubernatorial contest between former Congressman Jay Inslee and Washington state AG Rob McKenna.
An now we have another poll, this one from Public Policy Polling (PPP) on behalf of the Washington Conservation Voters. The new poll is of 574 likely voters taken from October 15 to 16. The poll has Inslee leading McKenna 48% to 42%. The +5% for Inslee bests the +3% we saw yesterday.
A Monte Carlo analysis using 1,000,000 simulated elections using the new poll result gives Inslee 853,506 wins and McKenna 139,477 wins. The analysis suggests that if the election was held today, we’d expect to see Inslee come out on top 86% of the time. Here is the distribution of election outcomes:
The Survey USA poll I mentioned yesterday was in the field from the 12th to the 14th of October, so it makes sense to combine these two polls as one covering the 12th through the 16th.
The Monte Carlo analysis is now working with a total of 1,117 individuals of which 531 (47.5%) selected Inslee and 480 (43.0%) selected McKenna. In the simulations Inslee wins 865,961 times. McKenna wins 128,942 times. So, in our election covering the 12th through the 16th, Inslee takes 87.0% and McKenna 13.0%. Not much difference from the PPP poll alone, really. Here’s the distribution of election results:
The new PPP Poll gives Inslee eight consecutive polls in which he is ahead of McKenna, a streak that dates back to mid-July.
As it happens, there will be a new Washington Poll released tomorrow afternoon that should have even more insight into the gubernatorial race and some of the other down-ballot races and measures. Stay tuned….
by Carl Ballard — ,
This is a terrible decision from The Seattle Times.
The Seattle Times Co. jumped directly into two of the state’s hottest political contests Wednesday, launching an $80,000 independent-expenditure campaign promoting Republican gubernatorial candidate Rob McKenna and announcing a similar effort in support of the referendum to legalize gay marriage.
I don’t like either of these, but the R-74 ad makes a tiny bit of sense on its own. They look like they might win a squeaker, so the Seattle Times can say, “oh look our ads made the difference.” I don’t think that’s good for the brand of independent minded fair people, but at least I could see a path to it working. But since McKenna is losing, and will probably lose, the pitch will be buy an add, it won’t help you? Or do they think it will turn it around?
by N in Seattle — ,
In case HA readers have forgotten, I’d like to remind you that Washingtonians will elect 10 people to represent them in the House of Representatives in the upcoming 113th Congress. That, of course, is an increase of one over the nine Representatives we’ve sent to DC for the last 20 years.
Incumbents are running for reelection in seven of the redrawn Congressional Districts, and every one of them is all but certain to win. Therefore, I offer congratulations-in-advance to Rick Larsen, Jaime Herrera Beutler, Doc Hastings, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Jim McDermott, Dave Reichert, and Adam Smith … the Representatives in, respectively, the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th, 8th, and 9th Districts. That’s three Democrats (Larsen, McDermott, Smith) and four Republicans (Herrera Bueutler, Hastings, McMorris Rodgers, Reichert).
But what of the two open, and one brand-new, seats?
It was widely acknowledged that the principal goal of the Democratic members of the Redistricting Commission was to center the new 10th CD on Olympia, and to anoint Denny Heck, who lost in 2010 to Herrera Beutler in the then-open WA-03, as their candidate. He faces underfunded Republican Dick Muri, who unsuccessful challenged Adam Smith in the old WA-09 two years ago. Well, it looks like Tim Ceis and Dwight Pelz got their wish, as the Cook Political Report rates WA-10 Solid D and DailyKos Elections calls it Likely D. The two organization agree that WA-01, where Suzan DelBene faces teahadist John Koster, and where most of Washington’s Congressional-race attention has been concentrated, Leans D. Boy, I hope they’re right.
The third open seat came as something of a shocker. Norm Dicks surprised many Washingtonians when he announced his retirement after 18 terms representing the 6th District. Conventional wisdom suggested that WA-06 had remained in Democratic hands largely because of Dicks’s seniority (ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee) and close ties to the strong Navy presence on Hood Canal and Puget Sound. The sprawling, largely rural WA-06 doesn’t fit the usual mold of Democratic CDs.
Well, conventional wisdom appears to have been wrong. Even though a Republican self-funding Weyerhaeuser relative is on the ballot, both Cook (Likely D) and dKos put the District strongly in the Democratic column. In fact, on Monday DailyKos Elections upgraded WA-06 from Likely D to Safe D.
The principal reason behind this happy outcome is the superb Democrat running in the 6th District, Derek Kilmer. I’ve known Derek ever since I arrived in Washington in 2001; at that time he and his wife Jen were colleagues of my sister in the 36th District Democrats. We in Seattle were disappointed when they relocated to Gig Harbor (he’s Vice President of the Economic Development Board for Tacoma-Pierce County), but it was clearly the right thing for them. I’m thrilled that the people of WA-06 see the same positive qualities in Derek that I recognized.
When Derek won his first political race (State Rep from the 26th LD in 2004), I began thinking that he could be a great candidate to replace Norm Dicks when the old warhorse decided to hang ’em up. I didn’t expect it to come quite so soon, but it seems like I was onto something.
So Derek will, in all likelihood, slide into Norm’s position as a Democratic Congressman. That leaves the overall status of Washington’s delegation in DC in the same place it was when the Redistricting Commission finished its work — five Democratic CDs, four Republican CDs, and one up for grabs. If, as most pundits predict, DelBene keeps the odious Koster away from DC, we’ll be 6-4 Democratic. Not nearly what I’d like it to be, but I believe that would be an accurate description of our state.
[Cross-posted from Peace Tree Farm]
by Carl Ballard — ,
– Great endorsement, Seattle Times.
– I think Oliver is somewhat selective, but yes, there are many areas where liberal ideas clearly are the default, for now.
– This post on Obama’s popularity in Ireland contains some of the worst puns in human history.
– Yet another Biblical family.
– Good luck to the SeaTac Fuelers who have their day in court today.
by Darryl — ,
A new poll has been released for the Washington state gubernatorial contest. The Survey USA poll finds former WA-1 Congressman Jay Inslee leading Washington state AG Rob McKenna by 47% to 44%. The poll of 543 people (MOE 4.3) was taken from 12th to the 14th of October. The poll was commissioned by KING 5.
This new one makes seven consecutive polls in which Inslee leads McKenna, a streak that dates back to mid-July.
A Monte Carlo analysis with a million simulated elections using the newest poll results gives Inslee 692,593 wins to McKenna’s 296,697 wins. This suggests that, if the election was held today, Inslee would win with a 70% probability, and McKenna with a 30% chance. Here is the distribution of election outcomes from the simulation:
Inslee’s lead is not significant by standard statistical inference. Even so, the longer trajectory facilitates understanding of the state of this race:
Clearly, Inslee maintains a small, but consistent, lead in the race.
And given what a snoozer the debates have been, don’t expect any big changes in the standings.