HorsesAss.Org

The Young Turks discuss the tie between the Bengals and Eagles last week and how bizarre it was that Donovan McNabb was unaware that there are ties in the NFL:

Jason Whitlock tries to defend McNabb here, but I just can’t. I’m as big a Donovan McNabb fan as anyone, but that was a shockingly dumb admission – not just that he didn’t know there were ties, but to be so unembarrassed by that lack of knowledge that he admitted it on camera. How do you play in a professional sports league for so long and not know something like that? Has he never looked at the standings of the league and seen the ‘T’ next to the ‘W’ and ‘L’?

If it wasn’t for this, it would be the dumbest thing I’ve heard all season.

What are you doing to help the economy this weekend? I purchased a 472-pack of toilet tissue, meaning the unit price per square is .00002 cents. If you only use one ply, it’s half that! But I will not spare a square, no matter what.

Meanwhile, go read Robert Reich if you wish. Sounds like some actual grownups may be in charge come Jan. 20.

Not to belabor Goldy’s earlier point, but the stupid idea that the netroots will come unglued when competent people take charge is, well, stupid. We’ll express differences of opinion at times but instead of trying to get brain dead people to come back to life via an act of Congress, we’ll simply state our case and work to elect people who we think will do a good job. It’s called democracy.

Deal, old media and Old Democrats. The netroots isn’t any one thing, it isn’t any one person and it sure in the hell ain’t going away.

Please list in comments how many bits of soap you can squeeze together to make new bits of soap, and how one might take one cranberry and make it multiply a hundred times before Thanksgiving to make “Magical Paulson Cranberry Sauce.”

Last week’s contest was won by wes.in.wa, who just barely beat out Toby Nixon. The correct answer was Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Here’s this week’s contest. I think you’ll have to be quick to win this one…good luck!

A headline from today’s NY Post:  “Barack Obama doesn’t fear the enraged, impotent Netroots.”

Yeah, well, whatever.

If that’s the sort of self-soothing that makes the old media and political establishment feel better about their own declining fortunes, they’re free to hide their heads in that particular hole, but personally, I don’t feel all that enraged or impotent.  In fact, I’m still a bit amazed at how far we have come in such a short amount of time… and daunted by how far we have yet to go.

This movement we’re part of will take a decade or two to reach full fruition, and we are a lot more patient and pragmatic than most outside observers give us credit for.

Richard Roesler at Eye on Olympia reports that the husband of incoming state Rep. Shelly Short, R-Addy, pleaded guilty yesterday to third degree theft involving money stolen from a fair board.

Seems during the campaign Short and her husband had leveled all sorts of accusations against the Spokesman-Review, using terms like “political smear job” and the shoddy conservative standby “elitist.”

There’s far more to the tale of the Shorts, but it’ll be simpler if you just go read Roesler’s post.

Invoking the Ten Commandments is always a tell, huh? Harry Truman used to relay a saying he attributed to his grandfather that went something like, “If a man sings too loud on Saturday night and prays too loud on Sunday morning, best go home and lock up the smoke house.”

I hate to hit on the same editorial twice, but I’m just curious… has the Seattle Times ever editorialized their concerns over Microsoft’s operating system dominance, which peaked at 98% of the market?  And if Google were a local company, would they be concerned over its dominance of online advertising now?

Hmm….

And you wonder why the Seattle Times is dying?

Google is getting rich packaging content owned by magazines and newspapers and not paying for it. At some point, Google should have to pay.

Yeah, that’s right, Frank… it’s all Google’s fault. Your paper’s declining fortunes have nothing to do with your own managment decisions and your inability to adequately respond to a changing marketplace.  So let’s get Congress to pass a law forcing Google to prop up your business by paying a royalty for the privilege of driving you traffic.  And while you’re at it, you better charge me a royalty too, since we parasitic bloggers do nothing but freeload off your content.

The fact is, Google isn’t getting rich linking to content, it’s getting rich selling ads.  And as long as the Times keeps pointing fingers instead of focusing on creating a more compelling product, they’ll continue to lose readers and advertisers.

Looking for the silver lining in our nation’s worsening unemployment numbers?

Citing a decline in donations caused by the slowing economy, Focus on the Family, the Christian advocacy charity in Colorado Springs, has eliminated 202 staff positions — 149 of them filled, 53 that were already vacant.

On the downside, this surely means tough times ahead for Colorado Springs’ burgeoning meth-dealing male hooker industry.

Last night at the 46th Legislative District Democrats monthly meeting, elections activist Jason Osgood announced his intention to run for King County Elections Director… which really didn’t come as much of a surprise considering Jason told me as much Tuesday night at Drinking Liberally.

Hmm.

I like Jason, and I appreciate his activism (if at times I think his focus is misplaced), so I sure hope he hasn’t conflated the 1.2 million votes he received in his recent run for Secretary of State into some sort of base of support.  Sure, Jason ended up pulling in about 41.5% of the vote while barely spending a dime—but that’s still only a few percent of voters greater than those who would pretty much vote for anybody with a “D” next to their name, and not much better than then-Republican Richard Pope, who in the 2000 Attorney General’s race garnered more than 38% of the vote against popular Democratic incumbent Christine Gregoire.  Indeed, Richard actually won 14 of 39 counties, while Jason barely eked out a victory in just tiny San Juan.

Still, if this were a normal election, I’d urge Jason to pursue his bliss, as he’ll certainly add some important issues to the debate.  Unfortunately, it’s not a normal election, and as I told him privately Tuesday night, I hope he’s prepared to bow out if support coalesces around a qualified candidate.

See, the Elections Director will be chosen in a February special election, with no primary, top-two or otherwise, to thin out the field.  And while the office is officially nonpartisan, we all know that true nonpartisanship is a fiction that lives only in the minds of editorialists and idiots.

From all accounts, Republican wingnut State Senator Pam Roach intends to throw her hat in the ring as the culmination of her decades long quest to earn a six figure salary from the government she loves to cut.  And given a crowded field of Democrats on the other side, she very well could win.

This would be a disaster.

A number of other names are being bandied about, but if we want this to be a fair fight they’re going to have to agree to agree to winnow themselves down to one.  The name that intrigues me most thus far is Port Commissioner Lloyd Hara, an uninspiring politician, but an auditor by trade, who would arguably bring the appropriate skill set and temperament to the office.  Despite his best efforts to show up at the right events, Hara doesn’t strike me as particularly progressive or Democratic; in fact, from a partisan perspective, he doesn’t strike me as much of anything.  And isn’t that, combined with competence, exactly what we need from an Elections Director to restore and maintain confidence?

So Jason, good for you for acting on your activism, but if you really care about elections integrity, I’m hoping you’ll step aside if the alternative means handing the election to Roach.

Holy crap.

(Props to Eschaton and thanks for the Sprite in my nose.)

[I was forbidden to blog during the 2008 campaign, so this is less timely than I would like it to have been… Oh well.]

The Municipal League of King County has a really noble mission. They rate candidates for political office, giving voters more information while subjecting the political process to a modicum of quality control. They do a pretty good job of it, too. Candidates gripe about their ratings (“Good” isn’t as good as “Very Good,” while “Outstanding” is the very best), but all in all, they seem to be doing their homework.

Which is what makes their endorsement of King County Charter Amendment Eight all the more confusing.

Charter Amendment 8, passed by King County voters this November, makes pretty much every elected office in King County non-partisan. The City of Seattle has had non-partisan elections for years; the only other county with non-partisan elections is Whatcom County.

But non-partisan elections don’t make our politicians any less partisan. The Seattle City Council may be non-partisan, but all nine members are Democrats. Same goes for Mayor Nickels. Does anyone think that stripping Kathy Lambert of the Republican label will make her any less of a Republican? Is Larry Gossett any less of a Democrat without that “D” next to his name? Hardly.

Voters use partisan labels to help make decisions on election day. Taking away this information ultimately makes it harder for the public to make an informed choice.

Why did the Municipal League, an organization that gives the public more information about candidates for office, endorse a charter amendment that would give voters less information?

The Municipal League gave telecom billionaire John Stanton a big award last year for his work on transportation governance reform. Some folks say Stanton is serious considering running for King County Executive. Removing the Republican label from John Stanton gives him a better chance, but it doesn’t make him any less of a Republican.

Dan Savage said it best: “If sex offenders have to register with the county, so should Republicans.”

I’ve had some complaints that it’s really not fair to chart the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average under George W. Bush compared to other presidents, as the DJIA isn’t all that broad a measure of market performance.  So here’s a chart of the S&P 500… which has done even worse under Bush than the Dow.

FYI, had you invested $100 in an S&P 500 index fund on inauguration day of 2001, it would now be worth less than $46 in inflation adjusted dollars.  So much for the CEO president.

The federal government should just purchase $25 billion worth of vehicles from the auto companies, then distribute them according to population via state lottery departments, which can then award them as prizes. Should be great for voluntary tax revenue!

Imagine the excitement each week, and imagine the bonanza for the traditional media during a time of lackluster ad sales. The possibilities are endless. A car an hour! Seven cars at once! Bowling for cars! You get the idea.

All this bridge loan stuff sounds pretty fishy to me anyhow. I don’t even know what it means. Most likely it means “you will never see this money again, taxpayers, making it a “bridge loan to nowhere.” Might as well make sure some lucky citizens get a new vehicle out of the deal.

Okay, small problem: there are a handful of states that have no lottery. According to this Wikipedia entry they are Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii, Mississippi, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. Maybe some of them could be persuaded to quickly enact a temporary car lottery or something. I’m sure Nevada could dream something up. Utah, well, you know.

I’m constantly accused by my friends in the traditional media of being way too cynical when it comes to the motives of Republican politicians… you know, like my eye-rolling at Dino Rossi’s alleged civic mindedness in taking his well publicized (and well exploited) minority stake in the Everett Aquasox.  Well here’s a little election day tidbit that totally escaped my attention at the time:

The Everett AquaSox baseball team – the Class A farm team affiliated with the Seattle Mariners – has been sold to 7th Inning Stretch LLP for an undisclosed sum.

The team had been owned by the Carfagna family for the past four years and was sold to the California company headed by majority owner Thomas Volpe. 7th Inning Stretch also owns the Shorebirds, of Delmarva, Md., and the Ports, of Stockton, Calif.

Yup, that’s right… Rossi and his partners waited until Nov. 4 at 5PM—just hours before the polls closed—to announce the sale of the team to out-of-state buyers.  I guess with the election over, he no longer needed the good will or the mailing list his minority stake bought him.

Forgive me for being cynical.

I’m not sure what Bruce Ramsey’s point is?

According to the latest story, the projected deficit in state government finances is $5.1 billion, up from $3.2 billion. The Times said before the election, in our endorsement of Dino Rossi, that the deficit might get to $5 billion by next spring, and we arrive at that figure early, in November.

A progressive blogger accused us of making a deceptive noise about the deficit, which he said did not really exist and was only a projection. Of course, that was before the election, too. Now it’s over, and the big problem is in the lap of Gov. Christine Gregoire and the two houses of the Legislature.

Well, it wasn’t a budget deficit, it was a projected revenue shortfall, and the size of the shortfall really wasn’t the issue.  The next biennium budget will be balanced, one way or the other, regardless of who is governor or which party controls the Legislature.  The issue in the election was always, who do we trust to make the hard choices necessary to balance the budget, consistent with the values of the majority of Washingtonians?

(Hint:  the voters’ answer was Gov. Gregoire.)

As for “deceptive noise,” it certainly was, and still is.  This budget crisis is not the result of overspending; the culprit in Washington, as in every other state in the union, is declining tax revenues.  Gov. Gregoire did not create this shortfall… our crappy national economy did.  And the Times’ efforts to promote Rossi as some sort of punishment or remedy for a revenue shortfall Gregoire didn’t create, was indeed deceptive.

It also serves to distract from the larger issue of Washington’s long-term structural revenue deficit, that when projected through both the good and the bad years, absolutely guarantees that state spending as a percentage of the state economy will steadily and dramatically shrink over the next few decades.

During the final few weeks of the campaign, Rossi and his surrogates relentlessly attacked Gregoire, alleging that she would instate an income tax.  She can’t and she won’t.  But despite its lack of political support, and even though such a dramatic restructuring could not possibly be implemented fast enough to address our current budget crisis, it is past time to start having a serious discussion about how to modernize our state tax system to meet the needs of our 21st Century post-industrial economy.

Our projected, $5 billion shortfall is largely the result of a particularly steep, downward swing in the economic cycle, but given a tax system that year over year taxes an ever shrinking portion of our economy, the long-term deficit will remain, even after the good times return.  Our current tax system is a 75-year-old improvisation, hurriedly constructed in the wake of a controversial court decision that overturned a voter-approved income tax, and it has long since proven itself to be outdated, inadequate and grossly unfair.

Now is the time to start a real discussion about how to modernize our tax structure to meet the needs of our modern economy.  And if the Times is willing to put aside the rhetoric and seriously join this debate, I’ll be more than happy to join them.