HorsesAss.Org

Jonathan Mann: A comment to the TSA.

Ann Telnaes: Barbara Bush, “We’ve had enough Bushes.

Young Turks: The pathetic twisted case of the Romney & Gingrich intern.

SlateTV: Nevada Senator comes out during same sex marriage debate.

Ignorance and Denial:

• Republicans in denial
• Mark Fiore: Head bangers.

Young Turks: Voters turn again Republican politicians over voting down background check vote.

Mark Sanford debates a cardboard image of Nancy Pelosi (…and, um, loses) (via Political Wire):

Sam Seder: Mark Sanford’s really, really lousy week.

The “Rent is too damn high” guy is back, rapping about it, and running for NYC Mayor (via Political Wire).

Library Accomplished:

• Jon: Disasterpiece Theatre (via Political Wire)!
• Sam Seder: The right wing’s Bush whitewash begins!
• ONN: All the former presidents gathers to lie about the Bush presidency and other news of the week.
• Maddow: Presidential LIE-brary
• Alex Wagner: A “good” man who made murderous decisions.
• Roy Zimmerman: Dick Cheney:
• Frank Conniff: “Freedom” must be his safe word
• Sam Seder: George W. Bush Library in George W Bush’s own fake words.
• Sharpton: Bush library is a triumph of democracy.
• Maddow: Revision accomplished.
• John Fugelsang: The bad and the good side of George W. Bush:
• Kimmel: Obama and Barbara Bush
• Sam Seder: George Bush’s legacy of terrorism

White House: West Wing Week.

Kimmel: The week in unnecessary censorship.

Stephen: Better know PA-17 (via Political Wire).

Young Turks: Infowars Boston bombing conspiracy theories.

Aqua Buddha Bomber:

• Slate TV: Rand Paul’s drone problems.
• Sam Seder: No problem killing Americans with drones.
• Young Turks: Don’t stand with Rand.

Young Turks: “Ex-Gay” leader apologizes for horrible ‘gay conversion therapy’.

Susie Sampson’s Tea Party Report: Congressional Report Card.

Young Turks: CISPA goes down in the Senate.

Townsquare: The end of the American Dream?

Chris Hayes: The untold story of deregulating chemical plants under Bush.

Miranda Warning:

• Ann Telnaes: Exploding liberty.
• Stephen on FAUX and Friends Miranda rights controversy.
• Young Turks: Are Miranda rights necessary?
• Ed and Pap: Analysis of the confession.
• Thom: We should not balance our Constitutional rights with security.
• Liberal Viewer: Should the Boston bomber get his Miranda rights?

Sam Seder: Culture of conspiracy.

Young Turks: FAUX News basks in its own ignorance.

Maddow: The dangerously sloppy reporting of Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post.

Pap: The Anti-intellectual epidemic in America.

Thom: The Good, The Band and The Very, Very Ugly.

Stephen gives Bill Clinton a Twitter lesson.

The Downside of Rush:

• Secretly recorded, Frank Luntz blames Rush Limbaugh (via Political Wire).
• Thom: The far right cult machine exposed.
• Sharpton: What Frank Luntz REALLY thinks about Rush
• Sam Seder: Rubio and Rush.
• Bashir: Luntz reveals.

Lawrence O’Donnell: Grad student debunks famous Harvard Study that pushes austerity.

Shuster: Stephen Colbert’s sister gets a boost.

Maddow: Black and white-out.

Young Turks: Bill-O pushes for more hatred and fear.

Ann Telnaes: Wall Street and your fragile nest egg.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

I love that my two favorite local politicians are hashing things out in the mayor’s race. In this case, they have dueling posts on Slog about sub area equity. Sub area equity is an important issue for a Seattle mayor who will have a seat on the Sound Transit Board of Directors. First, was Ed Murray, who I agree with in general, opposing sub are equity (I’m ignoring the political sniping in both; I’m pro political sniping, but not what I want to write about here).

Sound Transit’s sub-area equity requires that any money raised in one of the five sub-areas of the Sound Transit district must be spent in that sub-area. It may seem sensible on the surface, but it is really a terrible policy, originally cooked up by light rail opponent Rob McKenna (when he served on the King County Council and the Sound Transit board) as a way of forcing transit dollars that should have been spent in Seattle to be diverted to the suburbs instead.

Sub-area equity has done more harm to the cause of efficient deployment of limited transit dollars in the central Puget Sound—and thus more harm to Seattle—than any other single decision made in the last two decades of transit planning. It allocates dollars based not on density and demand for service, but on political geography. Instead of building a system from the inside out to maximize ridership and benefit smart land use decisions, it balkanizes the region and facilitates sprawl.

Sub-area equity needs to go. And it needs to be replaced with a more sensible policy that stipulates that Sound Transit dollars will be spent efficiently to add light rail where it will have the maximum impact in terms of moving people, i.e. in denser cities like Seattle and our growing inner-ring suburbs. Such a policy would ensure that Seattle’s transit needs are better accommodated – particularly our underserved West side Green Line communities including Ballard and West Seattle – while also ensuring that hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars are not diverted to building light rail in outlying areas where population densities are insufficient to support strong ridership.

I’m not sure it encourages sprawl (it brings transit to less dense places, but those places are already sprawling). But in general, I agree that there’s more bang for the buck in denser areas. And transit ought to be built more in our big cities and inner ring cities, and sub area equity is a hindrance to that. So fair enough.

Mayor McGinn has a response.

In fact, at the urging of myself and others, the Sound Transit board accelerated all of their planning around the region so we are prepared to go to the ballot in 2016 if the legislature gives Sound Transit revenue authority to support expansion.

All of that work falls apart if a Seattle mayor suddenly decided they wanted to change the deal. By attacking sub-area equity Ed Murray threatens to blow up Sound Transit. Sound Transit’s board was willing to advance these rail planning studies in Seattle in part because I pledged Seattle’s support to help complete the regional system. Communities outside of Seattle have been banking on future rail while the central portion has been built in Seattle. Proposing to end sub-area equity and take the money for Seattle is guaranteed to destroy the regional political coalition for rail and doom the chances of putting Sound Transit 3 on the ballot in 2016.

Further, sub-area equity protects Seattle. The recession significantly reduced Sound Transit’s revenues too, and they are working hard to meet their commitments elsewhere in King, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties. We need to ensure revenue raised in Seattle stays in Seattle to support our projects – which is why Seattle needs to defend sub-area equity, not attack it.

Even though McGinn probably wrote the better piece, I still agree with Ed Murray on sub area equity.

Generally this piece on a bill to allow businesses to discriminate against gay people if God tells them it’s OK by Josh Feit is solid. But I have to object to this paragraph:

The bill’s main sponsor is Sen. Sharon Brown (R-8, Kennewick). Brown’s district is the home to a controversy that blew up in March when Barronelle Stutzman, who owns Arlene’s Flowers in Richland, refused to do business for a gay couple.

It makes it sound like the business is in her district but the gay couple just happened to be there. In fact, Senator Brown is prioritizing –or at least is allowing the law to prioritize — businesses in her district that want to discriminate over her constituents who are being discriminated against. This hurtful bill won’t just hurt people in Seattle, or just in King County, or the Puget Sound region, or Western Washington. It hurts people all over the state.

Goldy notes that the GOP caucus fundraising for Senator Mike Carrell — who needs a bone marrow transplant — hasn’t made them more sympathetic to the plight of people who need better health care. Who knows, maybe he’ll come around, and maybe the rest of the caucus will too.

But more likely, he’ll be back to pushing the line that we have to keep tax loopholes wide open, let alone not raise rates and that’s more important than caring for the sick. Or something about the state not being the best place to pay for it.

And to be sure, we all want Senator Carrell to beat this shit. You can donate here, if you’re so inclined.

– Valiant protectors of our civil liberties, except when we might actually need our civil liberties protected.

– Pause…allow the incredible affront of that shit to marinate…continue.

– King Street Station, your argument is irrelevant.

– A friend describes me as an Alex Jones hipster, someone who was well aware and entertained by America’s leading conspiracy theorist long before he started showing up on CNN or hanging out with Charlie Sheen.

– Something close to 8% of ALL West, Texas residents were either injured or killed in the explosion.

– Don’t take the Cinnamon Challenge

– Tumwater Towers

Ugh on a stick, the state GOP.

Bailey was a guest last week on conservative talk radio KVI, where Republican State Chairman Kirby Wilbur is a frequent fill-in host. The two debunked the Dream Act as a way of damaging the Republican franchise rather than helping immigrants’ kids get an education. Democrats had just failed in a bid to force a Senate floor vote.

“It should be obvious, at least to anyone with an IQ above their waist size, that these (bills) have been picked for their political impact, has nothing to do with caring and compassion, to continue this mantra that Republicans are racists,” said Wilbur. “I mean, it seems to me it’s pretty obvious.”

Sen. Bailey agreed.

“It is pretty obvious that it is political. This bill has been brought forward at least twice before by (Sen.) Ed Murray, whgo is the sponsor of the Senate bill, at a time when both the Senate, the House and the Governor’s mansion were controlled by the Democrats and it begs the question: If this is such an important, absolutely needed bill, why didn’t it pass during those times?”

First off THAT’S NOT WHAT BEGS THE QUESTION MEANS! You mean it raises the question. Question begging is making a circular argument. When you use it wrong you sound like a dummy, and I hate you.* Second, if it’s just a trick, why not vote for it like a significant portion of the House GOP Caucus? Or at least let it come to a vote in committee? Or just let the people who want to testify testify? I mean honestly. Anyway, keep talking.

“Here’s another fact: If these (undocumented) students were added to the pool that already exists, underserved (sic) citizens, then the only way those students would ever get financial aid is if they are considered and given preferential treatment above citizens.”

Fact! Just look it up.

Anyway, after finding out about that, Rodney Tom knew just who to get mad at.

Tom has taken to blaming State Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles, D-Seattle, for its failure. The “Senate Majority Coalition” offered Kohl-Welles chairmanship of the Higher Education Committee. She refused to take it, on grounds that the governing coalition was under Republican control and would leave her with no authority.

Tom sent out a legislative “session update” last week that sharply attacked Kohl-Welles. He was called to account by Murray for violating Senate rules by using the e-mail newsletter to deliver a partisan attack on a colleague. The update, too, was edited.

I guess she forced him to vote against allowing the vote on the floor of the Senate.

[Read more…]

I don’t like the idea of sub area equity, although it may have saved Sound Transit politically by getting early buy in from the suburbs when Central Link and Tacoma Link were the biggest projects. Still, generally speaking, political solutions designed to reassure suburbanites that big mean Seattle isn’t going to take all of their money (when the opposite is generally true) and that put arbitrary restrictions on transit development aren’t my favorite. See also, 40-40-20.

So the fact that Ed Murray is opposed to it is somewhat of a positive for me (although his doing it in a way that specifically attacks building rail to from Ballard to Downtown is not helpful). But over at Seattle Transit Blog, Ben Schiendelman makes the case for Sub Area Equity.

Subarea equity originally existed because suburban legislators, in creating Sound Transit, wanted to make sure that suburban money didn’t end up spent in Seattle. As a result, Link implementation was at first slower. But now that Sound Transit 2 is passed, the North King subarea’s “spine” is fully funded. Most of the political pressure on Sound Transit is now to expand to Tacoma, Everett, and Redmond, and most of the board votes are outside Seattle.

In a Sound Transit 3 package, subarea equity is paramount to ensuring that we get a new line in Seattle – it ensures that Seattle’s contribution stays in the city, and political pressure doesn’t move money out to the ends of the lines.

Murray claims that his reason for wanting to remove subarea equity would be to focus transit investment in Seattle – but the outcome of removing it would be the opposite. As a transit advocate who wants Seattle to have more grade separated transit, this is scary because it’s a direct threat to a new line in the city, and it’s scary because a mayoral candidate should have a better grasp of the issues.

It does seem rather abhorrent to have sub area equity when we’re building Central Link and Tacoma Link and then not have it when we’re building out to the suburbs.

The Seattle Chapter of Drinking Liberally meets tonight. Please join us for an evening of politics over a pint.

We meet every Tuesday evening at the Montlake Ale House, 2307 24th Avenue E. Starting time is 8:00pm. Some people show up earlier than that for Dinner.

Can’t make it to Seattle tonight? Check out one of the other DL meetings over the next week. The Tri-Cities chapter also meets tonight. On Wednesday, the Burien and Bellingham chapters meet. On Thursday the Woodinville chapter meets.

With 205 chapters of Living Liberally, including sixteen in Washington state, four in Oregon, and two more in Idaho, chances are excellent there’s a chapter meeting near you.

– Federal Way something something because guns make us safer.

– The Republican leadership has spent considerable effort whipping up their conservative base into a frenzy over taxation. It has never really mattered to them that most federal tax rates are at their lowest levels in decades. Calculative politics to destroy the budget ability of the federal government to protect and assist working class families? To redistribute more of our country’s wealth to the already rich?

– Opposition to the coal trains.

– If it’s a day that ends in a “y” Tim Eyman proposes an initiative that looks unconstitutional.

– Members of Russell’s unit testified in 2009 that his behavior changed after his third tour in Iraq and he eventually sought help from the Camp Liberty clinic, where he received counseling and prescription medication.

– Is a little class too much to ask? Yes, yes it is.

– New rules for South Lake Union passed out of committee.

– Girls and Boys Go to Jupiter

There are many reasons why Latinos tend to shy away from supporting Republicans. First, it’s because Republican politicians are constantly telegraphing to Latinos that they are second class citizens. Never mind the blatantly racist crap we get from politicians like Sheriff Joe Arpaio. There is enough subtle stuff to last a political lifetime. You know, like nutjburger Sharron Angle defending before an auditorium of Latino student, her “illegal immigrant” ads portraying Mexican individuals as sinister:

I don’t know that all of you are Latino…Some of you look a little more Asian to me. I don’t know that.

“Mexican? Were they really Mexican?!?” Uh huh. Right.

Or Rep. Don Young (R-AK) casually throwing out the term “wetbacks” in referring to immigrant workers on his father’s farm.

Latinos also have plenty of good policy reasons to shy away from Republicans. Republicans aren’t particularly good about supporting policies that serve or protect relatively disadvantaged populations of any sort. They have become the party of preserving privilege for the privileged. Sadly, they aren’t going to be able to change their policies overnight. And, even then, the image problem will lag for years behind the policy change.

It will take Republicans years to decades to repair all of this self-inflicted damage. Immigration reform is one of those policies that offer Republicans…well, not exactly opportunity. But maybe something….

Politico’s Emily Schultheis points out the catch-22 that Republicans find themselves in over immigration reform. Essentially, blocking immigration reform will further alienate them, and hinder their image reform goals (see The Autopsy). For years to come.

Alternatively, by enacting immigration reform:

The immigration proposal pending in Congress would transform the nation’s political landscape for a generation or more — pumping as many as 11 million new Hispanic voters into the electorate a decade from now in ways that, if current trends hold, would produce an electoral bonanza for Democrats and cripple Republican prospects in many states they now win easily.

Theoretically, the Republicans could get some political advantage among current Latino voters by supporting immigration reform. That’s good for them in the short run. The real problem comes 13 years down the road:

Extrapolating 2012 voting trends to the 2028 presidential election — the first in which previously undocumented Hispanics could exercise their voting rights after a 13-year path to citizenship — is an inherently speculative exercise. But it is one that highlights the political sword hanging over Republicans as they consider immigration reform with a path to citizenship, an idea that is already deeply unpopular with many red-state constituencies.

To support the measure virtually guarantees millions of new Democratic voters.

What to do? I think the only reasonable thing for Republicans is the Hail Mary Pass. Passing immigration reform now at least gives them a fighting chance to win the “hearts and minds” of Latino voters. It’s a gamble, because they would have make huge progress in “image reform” by the time year 13 arrives. And, even then, it will most likely only allow them to minimize the damage.

The alternative—further pissing off the community—comes with an immediate hit that will only be compounded by the time the 13-year Gauntlet is run.

But it will also hurt like hell in 2020, when Republicans stand to lose their lopsided advantage from the 2010 gerrymandered congressional districts. That will set Republicans back, possibly for decades.

I hope Republicans do strongly back immigration reform. Not because I want them to have a shot at redemption with Latinos. Rather, because it is the proper policy that will improve the lives of millions of people, including a great many U.S. citizens—like U.S.-born children whose parents are undocumented.

What I see as the biggest threat to the future of the Republican party is the heightened xenophobia in the wake of the Boston bombing that may end up dominating their party. It threatens to foreclose on their Hail Mary option.

– Happy Earth Day.

– There was a lot that we missed last week as we focused on West and Boston. I didn’t even realize that CISPA was up for a vote.

– In other words, it looks like the Mormons might be getting the Glengarry leads and the Cadillac Eldorado, while the Catholics will be lucky to get the steak knives.

– By the way, Cardinal O’Malley, there IS violence and terrorism tied directly to abortion. The bombimg of abortion clinics, for example. Please make a note of it.

– McGilvra Place looks nice.

– I hate that background checks couldn’t get 60 votes in the Senate, but this narrative that Obama could just lean on some Democrats is ridiculous.

– The Week in #FAIL

Last week’s contest was won by milwhcky. It was Miami Beach, FL.

This week’s is somewhere in Washington, good luck!

Deuteronomy 14:18
You must not eat bats.

Discuss.

Liberal Viewer: FAUX News trumps up bugging charge against Mother Jones.

Stephen: Oopsie Daisy Homophobe:

Thom: GOP pats Exxon on the back for Arkansas oil spill.

Young Turks: Student v. abstinence only education.

DCCC: “He lied to us”.

Katie Compa: White liberal parents.

Ann Telnaes: The Perpetual War on Terror.

Young Turks: OK Rep, “Don’t Jew me down”.

Bill Maher: War and Peace.

Torture in OUR NAMES:

• Thom and Pap: Does torture nullify American exceptionalism?
• Sam Seder: Non-partisan report says U.S. tortured.
• Pap and Sam Seder: The MSM was complicit.

Chris Hayes: Last safety inspection of West plant was in 1985.

ONN: Week in Review.

Thom: The Good, The Bad, and The Very, Very Ugly.

Bill Maher with New Rules (via Crooks and Liars).

Sam Seder: Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX-1) thinks Muslim terrorists are pretending to be Hispanic.

Bombing in Boston:

• Mark Fiore: Boston Marathon
• Jon thanks Boston.
• Obama speaks on Boston:
• Sam Seder: CNN’s uberbotch
• The three minute version of CNN’s U-Turn on bombing arrests
• Maddow: Identifying suspects
• Young Turks: NY Post takes the trophy from CNN…for wrong.
• Sam Seder: The NY Post falsely accuses teens of being bombers.
• Maddow: Murdoch’s NY Post media failure.
• Chris Hayes: Internet vigilantism
• Stephen: Premature arrest report
• Jon: Exclusive…but completely fucking wrong!
• Sam Seder: Asswipe loon Alex Jones asks “false flag” question
• Young Turks: Father, “true angle”; Uncle, “losers”
• Glenn Beck: Government has until Monday to “come clean” about Benghazi-Boston bombing link.
• Young Turks: “Quiet, shy, like us”.

White House: West Wing Week.

Kimmel: This week in unnecessary censorship.

Young Turks: Hunger strike at Gitmo.

Thom: How to create a right-wing terrorist.

Jon: Barrier method.

Ann Telnaes: Tax day.

Young Turks: What happened in Texas?

U.S. Senate Republicans Puts Guns in the Hands of Terrorists!

• Stephen: Ted Cruz and background checks
• Jon: “We think killing our citizens is our job.”
• Sam Seder: Gun reform fails.
• Young Turks: Conspiracy theories kill gun control legislation
• Maddow: Obama shames spineless Senate Republicans
• Thom: “Shame on you, Congress”.
• John Fugelsang: If you’re against background checks, you’re against America
• Maddow: “Killer” Republicans filibuster…
• David Shuster and David Schecter: Congress hears cries of dead children.
• Young Turks: Gun-nut host tells Newtown victim families to ‘go to hell’

Thom: The Good, The Bad, and The Very, Very Ugly.

Robert Reich: Why our democracy is succeeding on social issues and failing on economic issues.

Maddow: Terrorism tools within reach of the dangerously deluded ‘patriot’ terrorists.

NASA awesome: What happens if you wring out a cloth in space?

Young Turks: Idiot Republican Rep. “Peter” Hansen calls women “vaginas”.

Slate: BSA lifts ban on Scouts, but not leaders.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

The Senate can’t get 60 votes on background checks at gun shows, and I don’t even know what to write anymore. I mean honestly. This is a measure with 90% approval, and it’s so on the margin of what needs to be done to prevent the type of violence that’s been happening.

Background checks and limits to the amount of ammunition that can be fired before reloading are where the debate is. Maybe it’ll be a bit tougher for the worst people to get guns. Maybe the next killer will have to reload and maybe move on before he’s killed as many of the children in a room. Maybe only 10 or 15 kids will die in the next attack. Nothing to address handguns, or urban crime more generally. And that is too fucking much.

I don’t know what to say, except maybe thank God Gabby Giffords can still write.

I watch TV and read the papers like everyone else. We know what we’re going to hear: vague platitudes like “tough vote” and “complicated issue.” I was elected six times to represent southern Arizona, in the State Legislature and then in Congress. I know what a complicated issue is; I know what it feels like to take a tough vote. This was neither. These senators made their decision based on political fear and on cold calculations about the money of special interests like the National Rifle Association, which in the last election cycle spent around $25 million on contributions, lobbying and outside spending.

I don’t know what I can possibly add to her piece, except a determination to keep working. And of course fuck Instapundit.