Earlier this week I offered Attorney General and gubernatorial candidate Rob McKenna some solid advice:

[T]he sitting state Attorney General should NOT have his campaign stooges give uninformed legal babble opinion—it reflects badly on the legal prowess of the Attorney General.

But now, McKenna is doubling down on this sort of idiocy…by mailing out a fundraising letter built around a whopper of a lie, built on their fringe legal theory.

Publicola reports on McKenna’s letter that starts out:

The leading Democratic contender, Congressman Jay Inslee, has a war chest of over $1,000,000 in his re-election campaign for Congress. This week the media is reporting that he intends to illegally transfer that money to his state campaign for governor.

By “the media”, the McKenna campaign means this AP piece that was carried by numerous media sources.

A plain reading of the AP piece yields these facts (reordered):

1. McKenna had $40,000 left over from his 2008 campaign
2. McKenna didn’t segregate the money into a surplus account; rather, he rolled over those funds to his 2012 campaign
3. The rolled-over funds commingled with new money and, therefore, are subject to campaign contribution limits
4. Inslee has $1.2 million surplus from past campaigns squired away in a separate account.
5. Inslee asked the PDC for permission to use the surplus, with donor consent, for his gubernatorial bid.
6. About $1 million of Inslee’s money never commingled with new money so it would not be subject to campaign contribution limits
7. The McKenna campaign characterized Inslee’s money as “illegal,” and claimed that Inslee was circumventing Washington state law
8. The PDC disagrees with McKenna’s intrepertation; they agree that Inslee can, with donor consent, use about $1 million for his gubernatorial campaign without contribution limit issues
9. The only challenge to the PDC’s interpretation of the law in the article comes from McKenna

This last point is important. It means McKenna’s fundraising letter is premised on a lie. It says:

This week the media is reporting that [Inslee] intends to illegally transfer that money to his state campaign for governor,

Not true. The media does not suggest the proposed transfer would be illegal. Here is what an honest McKenna could say:

This week the media is reporting that [Inslee] intends to transfer that money to his state campaign for governor. The PDC says this is legal. We disagree.

That would be an honest summary of the situation.

Instead this whole episode leaves us with a troubling picture of McKenna:

• He (or his campaign) fucked-up their own cash roll-over, apparently through ignorance of the state’s campaign laws
• He espouses a fringe legal theory about campaign cash roll-over, one that is contradicted by the PDC
• He is willing to blatantly lie to his potential donors

The episode not only throws into doubt if he has the integrity to be Governor, it throws into doubt his competence as our state’s top lawyer.

The Republicans are still trying to find a credible opponent for Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) in 2012. Former Bush Deputy White House spokesperson and Bush-Cheney ‘04 Press Secretary, Scott Stanzel is considering it.

But I said “credible.”

And now Seattle Weekly‘s Mike Seely writes:

…lately we’ve been hearing somewhat credible rumors that 8th District Congressman Dave Reichert might be up for abandoning his seat and challenging Cantwell. So is this chatter serious, or is there a stealthier factor at play here?

By “stealthier factor” he means that Reichert is using such rumors to leverage a more favorable redistricting outcome.

Seely ponders:

But what if Reichert’s motives are more pure? What would ensue would be a fascinating race between polar opposites: Cantwell, the wonkish brainiac who takes on issues of substance yet struggles with retail politics and staff retention, versus Reichert, the dull knife who gets by on Ken-doll looks, law-enforcement legend, and timely tacks to the center.

That would be fun! I like it. Reichert is, for sure, a stronger opponent for Cantwell than is Stanzel. But a Reichert challenge would accomplish two things. First, it opens up the Democratic-leaning 8th CD (which, of course, may be unrecognizable by 2012). Second, it means Republicans would dump lots of money into the race. Less so with Stanzel; Republicans would find more promising races upon which to spend their spoils.

This is Reichert’s big Window of Opportunity…but could he win?

In a statewide competition against an uberwonk, Reichert would not get away with his usual strategy of dodging all things substantive. He’ll have to speak in public and try to come off as intelligent and informed. No more “I’ve looked in a microscope and seen the heartbeat of a stem cell” moments; no more, “I don’t know enough about this issue, so I’ll pass on the question” answers like he gave in his 2006 debate against Darcy Burner. No more confessions of voting the way the leadership tells him to vote. The Cantwell campaign would eat him alive for such blunders.

So, no, he can’t. If Reichert sticks his head through that Window of Opportunity…he’ll get his freakin’ throat slit….

The last time Jane Hague ran for re-election to King County Council (district no. 6), it was discovered that she had been hiding a DUI arrest, and was abusive of the arresting officers. We learned that she had lied about having a college degree. She also got hit with multiple PDC complaints. Alas, most of this came to light too late for a strong candidate to challenge her.

She has some serious electoral competition this year, with three challengers. One challenger, Richard Mitchell, is rated “Outstanding” by the King County Municipal League. Hague is rated “Good.”

And what does the Stranger have to say for this race?

Mitchell is the most accomplished and promising challenger to Jane Hague on the Metropolitan King County Council, and earns [our] endorsement. In our interviews with the four candidates for this seat, he stood out for his quick mind and grasp of detail.

[…] The County Council is nonpartisan, but when asked Mitchell said he is a Democrat because of that party’s identification with immigrants, civil rights and environmental justice. He describes his politics as “fiscally conservative and socially progressive.”

“Accomplished, ” “Quick mind,” “grasp of details”? Typical reality-based blather from a left-wing rag.

Oh wait…my mistake, that was the Seattle Times endorsing Mitchell over Hague.

I know, I know…the bland writing was a dead giveaway. Here’s another giveaway:

Our concern about Mitchell is that he might be too quick to raise taxes. That caveat noted, he is one of the most attractive new faces on the local scene, and we endorse him for the County Council.

Hmmm…somebody on the Seattle Times editorial board is rather aroused by this candidate….

Here is what The Stranger had to say:

The Stranger Election Control Board wants to have Richard Mitchell’s baby. Mitchell is intelligent, passionate, progressive, eloquent. We’d vote for Mitchell for anything. City council. School board. Legislature. Cruise director.

If there are issues on which Mitchell and the SECB disagree, we’re probably wrong. The man could dig a deep-bore tunnel that even the SECB could get behind.
[…]

Mitchell can walk on water. He can raise the dead. He can even manage to answer a reporter’s question directly, without a hint of equivocation, all the while remaining nuanced. That’s not meant as a slam against fellow challenger John Creighton, a pleasant surprise as a port commissioner, but a stereotypical waffler as a politician. Oh wait. We guess it is.

Mitchell is exactly the sort of smart politician everybody says they want, but who never seems to get elected.

Without hesitation, Mitchell said he would approve a $20 car tab to avert a devastating 17 percent cut in Metro bus service and believes in a minor sales tax bump to rescue the county’s underfunded criminal-justice system. Vote Mitchell.

I’ll take that as The Stranger’s endorsement with a medically-concerning extended duration erection.

Here’s his web site and an intro video:

Please join us tonight for an evening of politics under the influence at the Seattle Chapter of Drinking liberally.

We meet at the Montlake Ale House, 2307 24th Avenue E. Starting time is 8:00 pm, but a few folks show up earlier for dinner.

Can’t make it tonight? The Burien chapter of Drinking Liberally meets tomorrow (Wednesday), July 27 at the Mick Kelly’s Irish Pub. Starting time is 7:00pm.

And with 230 chapters of Living Liberally, including seven in Washington state, chances are excellent there is a chapter near you.

Gubernatorial candidate Rob McKenna (R) has his undies all atwist over gubernatorial candidate Jay Inslee’s (D) plans to forward up to $1 million of congressional reelection surplus to his gubernatorial election war chest:

Republican candidate Rob McKenna’s campaign, responding to an inquiry from The Associated Press, characterized the money as simply “illegal.”

“He’s trying to claim that because it would be convenient for him to try to grab that money and evade Washington state law” McKenna campaign manager Randy Pepple said.

“Babbled” would have been a better last word for the sentence.

He added that the campaign or someone else would likely challenge any formal opinion that would allow the money transfers.

The PDC has reviewed the law and, in their opinion, finds such a transfer acceptable:

PDC staff believes Inslee’s interpretation is correct, and agency spokeswoman Lori Anderson said past candidates have taken similar steps.

“I don’t think that’s a fuzzy area,” Anderson said. “It’s spelled out well in our statutes and our rules.”
[…]

PDC officials pointed to a section of state law that allows candidate’s with dedicated surplus funds to roll them over to future elections for the same office without the money being subject to contribution limits. Because Inslee is running for a different office, officials also turned to a separate section of law that allows candidates who are running for a new office to get approval from donors to use past donations for a new campaign.

Those laws combined show Inslee’s interpretation is correct, Anderson said.

Three amusing observations:

First, the sitting state Attorney General should NOT have his campaign stooges give uninformed legal babble opinion—it reflects badly on the legal prowess of the Attorney General.

Second, the AP story points out:

After his 2008 campaign for attorney general, McKenna rolled an extra $40,000 over to the 2012 election cycle. Because that money was mingled with new cash, it is all subject to campaign contribution limits, according to the PDC.

Anderson said that McKenna could have placed that money into a dedicated “surplus” account and got the same benefits as Inslee.

OOPS!

In other words…McKenna’s campaign royally fucked up its own campaign cash roll-over. And now they presume to tell the PDC how the process is supposed to work for Inslee?!?

Uh-huh.

Third, as Jerry Cornfield points out, if the McKenna campaign sues the PDC over its interpretation of the law…

…[t]his could create an interesting situation down the road because McKenna’s office typically defends PDC interests in court.

That’s an amusing irony—kind of. And it reminds me of an episode from the chronicles of Horsesass involving McKenna’s predecessor.

Back in early 2003, when it became clear that Goldy’s Horses Ass Initiative, I-831 might conceivably make it to the ballot, then state Attorney General Christine Gregoire sued to keep it off the ballot.

Goldy lost the case. But just in case he won, and the initiative subsequently became law, Goldy was prepared to sue over the legality of the law. Doing so would have put Gregoire in the position of defending the new law.

Of course, McKenna has an easy out, by virtue of his own precedent: McKenna could simply refuse to provide the PDC with legal representation.

Problem solved.

Via Goldy:

Oregon Democratic Rep. David Wu announced today that he would resign from Congress in the wake of sexual assault allegations.
[…]

But if you think Republican Party insiders are rejoicing at the news, think again. Wu, who’d already been the subject of conjecture and criticism due to his increasingly erratic behavior, had been seen as a vulnerable target in this otherwise safe Democratic district spanning parts of Portland and the surrounding counties. But his resignation all but hands the seat to popular, progressive, Democratic Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian.

Blue Oregon’s Carla Axtman points out to Goldy that “this is very bad news for the Republican Party of Oregon…. Without Wu to run against, they have no game.”

Wu, a former college roommate of Sen. Bill Frist, created some controversy during the last election when some of his staff resigned after demanding an intervention for his increasingly erratic behavior.

Hmmm…maybe he was just all giddy with love/infatuation at the time, a la former South Carolina Gov. Mark Stanford. Except, apparently, unreciprocated for Wu.

ONN: News of the week.

Thom: The Good, the Bad and the Very, Very Ugly.

Ohio Gov. Kasich is Worst Person in the World.

Fiscal Apocalypse:

• Maddow: Obama hating GOP denialists push U.S. economy to brink of disaster, part 1
• Maddow: Obama hating GOP denialists push U.S. economy to brink of disaster, part 2
• Jon with Armadebtdon 2011: The national bullshit ceiling
• Thom: The biggest balanced budget hypocrisy.
• Pitches for National Debt: The Movie.
• Thom: Are the Republicans committing treason?
• White House: Obama’s PISSED.

Mark Fiore: We are the whirled.

White House: West Wing Week.

The G.O.P. Presidential Lunatic Asylum:

• Young Turks: The Young Barbarians.
• Bill Maher on Palin and Bachmann.
• Maddow: Rick Perry’s sick, intolerant ‘Pastor’ friends
  
• Gay barbarian hordes invade Bachmann’s “pray away the gay” clinic (via Slog):
• Bachmann’s end of the world speech (via ThinkProgress).
• Newsy: Are Bachmann’s headaches a roadblock to the White House?
• Jon: Natural Selection of the GOP primary candidates.
• Stephen: God’s pick for President? Rick Perry
• Olbermann: Right wing blog causing headaches for Bachmann.
• Young Turks: Michele Bachmann’s “headaches”
• Ann Telnaes: Herman Cain on banning mosques.
• Stephen: The biggest fantasy adventures of the summer….
• Maddow: Santorum tries to raise money off his “Google problem”.

Obama calls the International Space Station.

Thom talks to a deprogrammed teabagger.

Allen West’s Letter:

• Young Turks: Allen West (R-FL) loses it!
• Stephen: West’s pithy takedown of Debbie Wasserman Shultz.
• West’s email: The animated version.
• Ed: West is a thug.
• Young Turks: Allen West loses it!
• Wolf and DNC Chair discuss debt deal, Allen West, Romney

Young Turks: Abstinence-only education problem in Texas.

Sen. Smith and Bill-O-the-Clown lose to James Murdoch as Worst Person in the World.

Obama ends DADT.

The ALEC Caper:

• Pap: The truth about ALEC.
• Thom: The secrets of ALEC exposed

ONN: Tensions mount after North Korea destroys all of Asia.

Sam Seder: The Teabaggers don’t pay their debt.

West and Palin lose out to Casino boss Steve Wynn as Worst Person in the World.

News Corpse:

• Ed: Robert Greenwald on Murdoch.
• Pap: Murdoch’s attorney exodus.
• Ann Telnaes: Rupert Murdoch’s humble pie
• Young Turks: Should FAUX News be investigated?
• Ed and Pap: Murdoch’s willful blindness is no defense for criminal conduct.
• Jon: Parliament vs. Rupert Murdoch and David Cameron.
• Thom: Murdochgate is proof that media monopoly doesn’t work
• Liberal Viewer: FOX News crimes?
• Olbermann: PI jailed for phone hacking for NOTW, remains on the News Corpse payroll
• Ed and Pap: The Murdoch criminal defense.
• Jon on how the Murdoch scandal makes FAUX News sad.
• Newsy: Former News Corpse execs. say James Murdoch lied
• Thom: The cancer of infotainment & Murdoch pseudo-news
• Sam Seder: James Murdoch lied?
• Robert Greenwald Analyzes the Murdoch Parliament Appearance.

Thom: Can Republicans get elected without fraud and treason?

Stephen: CA gay history bill.

Sam Seder: Rush claims “It’s not hot—Government trying to fool you”.

Young Turks: FAUX News asks whether there are any poor families in America.

Faggot joke amuses FAMiLY LEADER’s (14-point marriage fidelity pledge) Bob Vander (via ThinkProgress).

Cenk Leaves MSNBC:

• Young Turks: Cenk is out at MSNBC, Part I.
• Young Turks: Cenk is out at MSNBC, Part II.
• Sam Seder: Cenk on leaving MSNBC.
• Olbermann and Cenk on Cenk leaving MSNBC.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

Washington’s initiative process has failed as a tool of The People. It has largely become a means for the wealthy to pass their own pet laws.

The problem is so bad that even the Seattle Times has had to acknowledge it:

WITHOUT addressing specific pros and cons of any of the three statewide initiatives that appear likely to qualify for November’s ballot, it is hard to deny one glaring truth: None are truly grass roots in origin.

Got enough money and a bug up your ass about something? Buy yourself an initiative! It’s easy. It’s fun!

Just ensure the initiative dangles a small, tangible, immediate benefit to voters, and their eyes glaze over with green dollar signs as they unwittingly vote to dismantle the The Commons that they previously supported and put in place. Seriously…it’s a perverse exploitation of human greed.

This year’s prime example is Tim “biggest lie of my life” Eyman’s I-1125, which is likely to qualify for the ballot (maybe today).

The initiative will severely restrict the State’s ability to toll highways AND prevent light rail from crossing on I-90.

An initiative born of a populist grassroots uprising? Hardly. The effort is primarily funded by Bellevue real-estate baron Kemper Freeman, who has contributed over a million dollars to the initiative campaign.

Freeman has a bug up his ass…he doesn’t like light rail or something. So, he is attempting to purchase himself a law.

The law would thwart the will of the voters, who have twice voted to bring light rail to the east side. Freeman sued to stop it, and lost. So now, Freeman will exploit fear of and self-interest over tolling to pass an initiative that will stop light rail—something that voters have made abundantly clear they want.

Yesterday, King County executive Dow Constantine was on KUOW. He pointed out:

“If you shop at Bellevue Square you contribute to [the I-1125] campaign.”

Conversely, you, your family, your friends can choose to take your money elsewhere.

Ultimately, the initiative process itself must be repaired. My first choice for repair is to get rid of paid signature gatherers altogether, as Oregon did in 1935. But Oregon’s current process, passed in 1985, that prohibits signature gatherers being paid per signature would be an okay start.

Until reform happens, the wealthy will retain the privilege of purchasing their own laws.

The National Journal takes a look at Republican prospects to defeat Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) in 2012 (my emphasis):

The biggest news nugget in the otherwise sleepy Washington Senate race this week was the emergence of Scott Stanzel, a former George W. Bush spokesman, as a possible candidate against Sen. Maria Cantwell, who unlike many other Democratic incumbents, looks to be in very solid shape in her 2012 reelection bid. While Washington leans Democratic, Republicans have fielded competitive statewide candidates in recent years. But so far, no one has stepped up to take on Cantwell.

and then, again…

While no major Republican is currently running against Cantwell, the GOP have landed top statewide recruits in the recent years, and have done so this cycle in two other races.

Who are these “top statewide recruits” the article mentions? By “recent years” does the author mean 2004?!? Because, it seems to me, that’s the last time the G.O.P. “fielded competitive statewide candidates” who weren’t incumbents. Namely, Dino Rossi in his close-but-no-cigar gubernatorial bid and Rob McKenna in his U.S. Chamber of Commerce-supercharged victory over Deborah Senn.

Rossi came back a couple of times, but was he a “top recruit” after the self-inflicted damage of the recount contest?

Remember Rossi’s un-statesmanlike quasi-concession speech:

“With today’s decision, and because of the political makeup of the Washington state Supreme Court, which makes it almost impossible to overturn this ruling, I am ending the election contest.”

That statement told voters a lot about Rossi they didn’t know seven months earlier. Can a person really be considered a top recruit after that kind of statement?

Did Mike McGavick ever threaten to become a competitive candidate?

“Competitive statewide candidates?” “Top statewide recruits?”

Where do these silly memes come from?

If you live in Seattle, chances are you can do most of your errands by walking:

Seattle was ranked as the sixth most walkable city of the 50 largest cities in the US, according to Seattle-based WalkScore.com which rates neighborhoods, cities and states to determine how walkable they are.

The site found New York as the nation’s most walkable city, followed closely by San Francisco. Boston, Chicago and Philadephia were the other states [sic] that triumphed above Seattle in the walkability category.
[…]

The top three walkable neighborhoods in Seattle were Denny Triangle, with a Walk Score of 98, and South Lake Union and Belltown, which both received the high score of 97.

Cool graphic of the Day is this this interactive map of Seattle neighborhood walkability scores. Walkability scores for other Washington cities are found here.

Oh…and this interactive map is runner-up Cool graphic of the Day. It allows you to see walkability scores for cities around the country, and you can restrict it to cities that fall within a desired minimum and maximum population size. Nifty.

Please join us tonight for drinks, conversation, and dinner at the Seattle Chapter of Drinking liberally.

We meet at the Montlake Ale House, 2307 24th Avenue E. Starting time is 8:00 pm, but a few folks show up earlier for dinner.

Last week we had a terrific turn-out for state Rep. Roger Goodman (D-45 LD), who is running for Congress in Washington’s 1st CD, the seat currently held by Rep. Jay Inslee. We also had first-hand reports from folks who attended a public hearing on King County Transit service cuts.

Can’t make it tonight? Drinking Liberally Tacoma meets on Thursday, July 21 at the Hub Restaurant. Starting time is 7:00pm. And with 230 chapters of Living Liberally, including seven chapters in Washington state, chances are good there’s one near you.

The AP reports that former Pres. George W. Bush Deputy White House spokesperson and Bush-Cheney ’04 Press Secretary, Scott Stanzel, is mulling over a run against Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA):

Scott Stanzel said Monday he will look at whether to challenge Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell in a race next year. He said he won’t decide until after he gets married in September.

One shouldn’t take lightly the propagandist who (1) helped sell George and Dick’s Excellent Military Adventure, (2) got Bush and Cheney reelected, and (3) managed to keep Bush and Cheney from being impeached or arrested for war crimes. Those are remarkable accomplishments.

On the other hand, many of the PR disasters that made George Bush the most unpopular President ever occurred on his watch.

As a former Bush-Cheney ’04 propagandist, Stanzel leaves behind a trail of statements that, quite frankly, won’t win over the hearts Washington voters. A search of the InnerTubes will reveal appearances of Stanzel attacking Sen. John Kerry that, outside the context of a heated presidential campaign, come off as petty. Likewise, his statements in his role as White House propagandist for Bush/Cheney administration will likely come back to haunt him. Finally, Stanzel has had some participation in the media campaign by ex-Bush administration people against Pres. Obama. That, too, will provide some fodder that will be used against him.

If you recognize the name Scott Stanzel at all, it is probably because he was the campaign manager for Defeat 1098, the group credited with defeating the Washington state high earner’s income tax initiative (I-1098). The up-side for Stanzel is that he has a track record on a “populist” issue in Washington state.

The down side of Defeat 1098 for Stanzel’s potential senatorial bid? In a post Citizens United world, I am imagining the kind of independent campaign that William Gates, Sr. might decide to fund against Stanzel.

Payback’s a bitch!

Thom and Daily Show co-creator Lizz Winstead: GOP following the Taliban Path?.

ONN: Pope supports gay marriage after meeting charming CT couple.

White House: Ruby Bridges visits with the President and her portrait.

Bill O’Reilly is once again the Worst Person in the World.

Thom with more The Good, The Bad, and the Very Very Ugly.

FAUX’s Eric Bolling is Worst Person in the World.

News Corpse?

• Ed and Pap: Murdoch and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
• Murdoch smacks down FAUX News anchor for mentioning hacking scandal.
• Sam Seder: FAUX and Friends claim THEY are victims of hacking.
• Stephen: Murdoch’s media empire troubles.
• Thom with Adele Stan: Is Murdoch’s empire crumbling?
• Olbermann: Will News Corpse scandal spread to FAUX News?
• Sam Seder: Rupert Murdoch calls in to clear up this whole phone hacking scandal.
• Newsy: Rebekah Brooks Resigns
• Young Turks: Will 9/11 hacking bring down FAUX News?
• Ann Telnaes: Rupert Murdoch.
• Randi and Pap: News Corp could be another Enron
• Newsy: Now the FBI is involved.
• Olbermann: My Murdoch moment, Part I and Part II

Thom with guest Alan Grayson: Running to get his congressional seat back and why.

White House: West Wing Week.

ONN: Millions irrationally feared dead in minor train accident:

Ed: N. Dakota Republicans demonstrate how callous & hypocritical the GOP is on human suffering.

The Republican Primary Asylum:

• Ann Telnaes: Bachmann and Santorum take the pledge.
• Maddow: Are you there, Gov. Rick Perry? It’s Me, God!.
• Mark Fiore: Mourning in America.
• Sam Seder: Bachmann courts Jews…and fails.
• Stephen: Michele Bachmann’s and Rick Santorum’s marriage pledge.
• Keith and Janeane Garofalo Michele and Marcus Bachmann
• Jon on Mrs. Marcus Bachmann’s husband (via Slog).
• Young Turks: Michele and Marcus Bachmann on gayness.
• Maddow: Rick Perry’s WACKOs lined up for “Day of Prayer”
• Lawrence O’Donnell on Newt’s refusal to sign the pledge.
• Huntsman: “Guilty as charged” to ending Medicare as we know it
• Maddow: The ghost of Senator Ted Kennedy debunks Mitt Romney’s FAT job-creation lie

Thom with The Good, The Bad, and the Very Very Ugly.

Stephen with Dan Savage (via Slog).

Newsy: Could BushCo face criminal investigation?

911 tapes: Young Republicans at Rob McKenna event want some guvment services! (Via Publicola).

Thom: The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster is officially recognized.

Ed: Psychotalk from FAUX’s five “brain wizards’.

The Default Standoff:

• Ann Telnaes: Republicans refuse to negotiate.
• Stephen explains Mitch McConnells scheme to hand the Republican’s nuts over to Obama.
• Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) calls on Republicans to put families over tax breaks for millionaires. (via Howie In Seattle):
• Thom: Mitch McConell wants to end democracy???
• Lawrence O’Donnell: The Eric Cantor problem
• Ed and Pap: The Republicans’ crazy old uncle image.
• Blooper: There’s a c**t deficit in America?!?
• Jon on Armadebtdon
• Republicans say the darndest things: U.S. credit rating not worth saving, says Ron Paul.
• Ed: Did Republicans paint themselves into a corner?
• Michele Bachmann on “Obama’s Choot-spa. (via Slog).
• Keith and Markos Moulistsas on debt ceiling stuff.
• Newsy: Pros and cons of McConnell’s plan B
• Jon on the debt ceiling debate and the GOP’s job creationism religion.
• Sam Seder and Katherine Harris on Michelle and Marcus Bachmann.
• Ross and Burbank interview Rep Jim McDermott (D-WA-07) on debt ceiling.
• Ann Telnaes: Cantor, the Teaparty and the debt ceiling.
• Thom: McConnell says “We The People” should have no voice
• SCTV: Michele and Marcus on marriage:

Ann Telnaes: Define rights of CEOs .

Some misguided Minnesota senator is Worst Person in the World.

Thom with even more of the Good, the Bad and the Very, Very Ugly.

Bill-O calls in to The Young Turks.

Ed: Obama trounces Republicans in fundraising.

ONN: Biden introduces a trio of sexy bodyguards.

Thom: The history of “We’re going broke!”

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

Washington state has a primary election on August 16th. Admittedly, the 2011 general election isn’t exactly electoral arena rock. I’ll only be voting on one election—King County Court of Appeals, Division 1, District 1, Judge Position 2, where an appointed incumbent is running uncontested. Still…with mail-in voting, there is never an excuse to not vote. Consider it practice and debugging for 2012.

Is your registration active? Address current? Now is a good time to double check here: verify your registration status, update your home address, check out your voting history, read your voter’s pamphlet, and even find contact information for your current elected office-holders.

Not registered to vote? Register online here. The deadline for on-line registrations is next monday, July 18th. After that, you can register in person through August 8th.

Not news: Congressional Republicans are way out of touch with a majority of Americans. In particular, their seemingly religious proscription against raising taxes isn’t a value shared by most Americans.

A new Gallup poll asked respondents on what methods should be used to reduce the federal deficit. There were five answers ranging from “Only with spending cuts” to “Only with tax increases”.

Not surprisingly, almost nobody (4%) opted for “Only with tax increases.” But just 20% said the deficit should be reduced with spending cuts only. Another 30% said “mostly with spending cuts.” And 32% wanted equal doses of spending cuts and increased taxes.

So half of Americans fall on the “mostly–to–all spending cuts” side of things. But “mostly” isn’t part of the ethos of many Congressional Republican. Rather, they have entrenched themselves in a “zero tax increases” mindset, and one they share with but 20% of Americans. To them there is a world of difference between the two options—there is a line drawn that cannot be crossed, lest they commit sacrilege before the eyes of their God (by whom I mean, of course, Grover Norquist).

Common sense, logic, reality, education, hunger, unemployment, investment in the future, the reputation of the U.S., the security of the U.S., the fiscal solvency of the U.S. all be damned! (“Norquist Will be done.”) No tax increases of any type for any reason! (“By the Grace of Grover.”)

It’s not just out of touch with 80% of Americans, when their religion compels them to hurt America, it’s treasonous.

News: Congressional Republicans are out of touch with Republicans. The same Gallup poll looked at the question by party identification:

We see that 68% of Republican respondents will accept tax increases at some level to fix the budget deficit.

In other words, only a quarter of American Republicans worship at the Altar of Norquist.

As August approaches, Congressional Republicans have a big decision to make: Grover or Country.

Pray they choose wisely….