[Update: An analysis using more recent polls can be found here.]
Five new state head-to-head polls have been released since my previous analysis of a hypothetical election contest between Pres. Barack Obama and former Speaker Newt Gingrich:
start | end | sample | % | % | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
st | poll | date | date | size | MOE | O | G | diff |
FL | Marist | 25-Jan | 27-Jan | 2795 | 1.9 | 52 | 35 | O+17 |
FL | Mason-Dixon | 24-Jan | 26-Jan | 800 | 3.5 | 41 | 50 | G+9 |
GA | SurveyUSA | 01-Feb | 02-Feb | 1144 | 3.0 | 43.9 | 49.7 | G+5.9 |
MO | PPP | 27-Jan | 29-Jan | 582 | 4.1 | 49 | 42 | O+7 |
OH | PPP | 28-Jan | 29-Jan | 820 | 3.4 | 51 | 39 | O+12 |
The two most recent Florida polls contradict each other. One gives Obama a +17% edge, and the other puts Gingrich up by +9%.
In Georgia, Gingrich has a +5.9% edge over Obama. That’s pretty anemic, considering that (1) it is Gingrich’s home turf, and (2) the same poll puts Romney up about +8 over Obama.
Obama has modest leads over Gingrich in Missouri (+7%) and a solid (+12%) lead in Ohio.
The previous analysis gave Obama a 100% probability of beating Gingrich with Obama getting a mean of 416 electoral votes. Now, after 100,000 simulated elections, Obama still wins ’em all. Obama’s average electoral vote count has increased to 421, and Gingrich averages just 117 electoral votes.
Obama | Gingrich |
100.0% probability of winning | 0.0% probability of winning |
Mean of 421 electoral votes | Mean of 117 electoral votes |
Here is the distribution of electoral votes [FAQ] from the simulations:
Ten most probable electoral vote outcomes for Obama:
- 441 electoral votes with a 9.90% probability
- 442 electoral votes with a 8.10% probability
- 433 electoral votes with a 5.31% probability
- 403 electoral votes with a 5.06% probability
- 404 electoral votes with a 4.66% probability
- 434 electoral votes with a 4.04% probability
- 435 electoral votes with a 3.42% probability
- 432 electoral votes with a 2.94% probability
- 395 electoral votes with a 2.92% probability
- 427 electoral votes with a 2.62% probability
After 100,000 simulations:
- Obama wins 100.0%, Gingrich wins 0.0%.
- Average (SE) EC votes for Obama: 420.6 (20.6)
- Average (SE) EC votes for Gingrich: 117.4 (20.6)
- Median (95% CI) EC votes for Obama: 427 (381, 449)
- Median (95% CI) EC votes for Gingrich: 111 (89, 157)
Each column of this table shows the electoral vote total aggregated by different criteria for the probability of winning a state (Safe=100%, Strong=90%+, Leans=60%+, Weak=50%+):
Threshold | Safe | + Strong | + Leans | + Weak |
---|---|---|---|---|
Safe Obama | 213 | |||
Strong Obama | 160 | 373 | ||
Leans Obama | 68 | 68 | 441 | |
Weak Obama | 0 | 0 | 0 | 441 |
Weak Gingrich | 1 | 1 | 1 | 97 |
Leans Gingrich | 0 | 0 | 96 | |
Strong Gingrich | 32 | 96 | ||
Safe Gingrich | 64 |
This table summarizes results by state. Click on the poll count to see the individual polls included for the state.
0 | 0 | EC | # | Total | % | % | Obama | Gingrich | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 8 | Votes | polls | Votes | Obama | Gingrich | % wins | % wins | |
AL | 9 | 0 | (0) | (100) | |||||
AK | 3 | 0 | (0) | (100) | |||||
AZ | 11 | 1 | 443 | 56.2 | 43.8 | 96.8 | 3.2 | ||
AR | 6 | 0 | (0) | (100) | |||||
CA | 55 | 1* | 900 | 61.1 | 38.9 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
CO | 9 | 1* | 729 | 54.3 | 45.7 | 95.4 | 4.6 | ||
CT | 7 | 1* | 545 | 58.7 | 41.3 | 99.8 | 0.2 | ||
DE | 3 | 0* | (100) | (0) | |||||
DC | 3 | 0* | (100) | (0) | |||||
FL | 29 | 4 | 5042 | 56.2 | 43.8 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
GA | 16 | 1 | 1071 | 46.9 | 53.1 | 7.6 | 92.4 | ||
HI | 4 | 1* | 517 | 70.4 | 29.6 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
ID | 4 | 0* | (0) | (100) | |||||
IL | 20 | 0* | (100) | (0) | |||||
IN | 11 | 0* | (0) | (100) | |||||
IA | 6 | 1* | 1262 | 55.9 | 44.1 | 99.8 | 0.2 | ||
KS | 6 | 1* | 431 | 52.7 | 47.3 | 78.1 | 21.9 | ||
KY | 8 | 1* | 546 | 51.6 | 48.4 | 70.9 | 29.1 | ||
LA | 8 | 0* | (0) | (100) | |||||
ME | 4 | 1* | 606 | 61.1 | 38.9 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
MD | 10 | 0* | (100) | (0) | |||||
MA | 11 | 1* | 704 | 65.2 | 34.8 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
MI | 16 | 1 | 534 | 57.3 | 42.7 | 99.3 | 0.7 | ||
MN | 10 | 1 | 1137 | 55.4 | 44.6 | 99.6 | 0.4 | ||
MS | 6 | 1* | 732 | 41.3 | 58.7 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
MO | 10 | 1 | 529 | 53.9 | 46.1 | 90.1 | 9.9 | ||
MT | 3 | 1* | 1494 | 45.6 | 54.4 | 0.9 | 99.1 | ||
NE | 2 | 1* | 658 | 46.0 | 54.0 | 7.9 | 92.1 | ||
NE1 | 1 | 1* | 269 | 53.9 | 46.1 | 82.3 | 17.7 | ||
NE2 | 1 | 1* | 204 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 49.9 | 50.1 | ||
NE3 | 1 | 1* | 188 | 31.9 | 68.1 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
NV | 6 | 1* | 496 | 57.3 | 42.7 | 98.7 | 1.3 | ||
NH | 4 | 1* | 982 | 55.7 | 44.3 | 99.5 | 0.5 | ||
NJ | 14 | 1* | 666 | 66.7 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
NM | 5 | 1* | 475 | 58.9 | 41.1 | 99.7 | 0.3 | ||
NY | 29 | 1 | 521 | 67.0 | 33.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
NC | 15 | 1 | 717 | 53.3 | 46.7 | 89.1 | 10.9 | ||
ND | 3 | 0 | (0) | (100) | |||||
OH | 18 | 2 | 2187 | 57.4 | 42.6 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
OK | 7 | 0 | (0) | (100) | |||||
OR | 7 | 1* | 467 | 57.8 | 42.2 | 99.2 | 0.8 | ||
PA | 20 | 1 | 436 | 57.8 | 42.2 | 99.1 | 0.9 | ||
RI | 4 | 1* | 473 | 68.9 | 31.1 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
SC | 9 | 1* | 1854 | 52.3 | 47.7 | 91.4 | 8.6 | ||
SD | 3 | 1* | 484 | 37.8 | 62.2 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
TN | 11 | 1* | 450 | 59.6 | 40.4 | 99.8 | 0.2 | ||
TX | 38 | 1 | 644 | 51.1 | 48.9 | 64.4 | 35.6 | ||
UT | 6 | 0 | (0) | (100) | |||||
VT | 3 | 0 | (100) | (0) | |||||
VA | 13 | 1 | 545 | 56.3 | 43.7 | 98.3 | 1.7 | ||
WA | 12 | 1* | 506 | 60.3 | 39.7 | 99.9 | 0.1 | ||
WV | 5 | 1* | 811 | 41.4 | 58.6 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
WI | 10 | 1* | 1053 | 57.7 | 42.3 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
WY | 3 | 0* | (0) | (100) |
* An older poll was used (i.e. no recent polls exist).
Details of the methods are given in the FAQ.
The most recent analysis in this match-up can be found from this page.
Roger Rabbit spews:
Please Lord, let Newt be their nominee. I usually don’t ask for things, but just this once? Pretty please?
Roger Rabbit spews:
The Dirty Thirty
U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund and Citizens For Tax Justice have identified America’s worst corporations for (a) evading taxes, and (b) using shareholders’ money to lobby Congress.
#1 on the list is Pepco, a Washington D.C. utility that also has earned the dubious distinction of being America’s most hated company.
#2 is General Electric, which pays no U.S. taxes, reaps billions in tax subsidies, and spends tens of millions on lobbyists.
#3 is Paccar, and #4 is Portland Gas & Electric; Boeing is also on the list.
http://www.uspirg.org/sites/pi.....xation.pdf
Full Disclosure: Roger Rabbit owns shares of General Electric, and has lost money on them, which serves him right!
Roger Rabbit spews:
Yesterday, hundreds of state legislators began meeting in secret at a posh island resort — from which the press has been barred — to formulate a plan to privatize America’s education system and turn it into a for-profit industry.
http://www.truth-out.org/alec-.....1328280896
Carl spews:
I have a question about your NE results. I assume the district results are done independently of the state results. So would it be possible for one candidate to win a simulation of all of the districts but lose the state?
Darryl spews:
Carl,
If all future polls in the state provide CD breakdowns of the results, then no.
If not, I suppose it could, because the districts would be based on one or more old polls and the state based on the new poll. With any luck, I won’t have to deal with the situation.
Roger Rabbit spews:
Reichert Won’t Challenge Cantwell
Sheriff Hairspray announced today he will seek to retain to the 8th CD House seat.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.c.....rt04m.html