HorsesAss.Org

Hey… check out my new ringtone:

[audio:http://horsesass.org/wp-content/uploads/SuziePalin.mp3]

That’s Republican activist Peggy Boze, wife of right-wing KTTH talker David Boze, on her husband’s show telling Susan Hutchison exactly what she thinks of her. And of course, that’s Suzie, laughing appreciatively at the compliment.

With a little audio editing magic it sounds great on my iPhone, and it’ll sound great on your phone too. Just download the MP3 (or iPhone m4r) and copy it to your phone.

You can almost feel the Seattle Times editorial board gloating after a King County judge levied sanctions on Kent teachers—an onerous $200 per day, per teacher, retroactive—but if I were a Kent teacher, rather than go back to work, as the district, court and Times demand, or stay on strike and pay the fine, I’d simply quit my job.

Really. I know myself, and I simply couldn’t do my job to the best of my ability, knowing that I was working for an employer who disrespected me. And in asking for sanctions while rejecting a contract offer below it’s own original proposal, the Kent School District has shown its teachers an incredible amount of disrespect.

When the Kent teachers union made an offer Thursday morning that was $200,000 less than the Kent School District’s own bottom line yet would still reduce class sizes, teachers thought they had a solution that would bring an end to the now 16-day strike.

They were hoping to reach a tentative agreement before a 1 p.m. hearing before the judge who had issued an injunction Sept. 1 ordering the teachers back to the classroom on Sept. 8.

So when the district rejected the union’s offer — and made no plans for future bargaining sessions — the teachers were stunned. […] Then came King County Superior Court Judge Andrea Darvas’ sanctions — $200 a day per teacher, retroactive to Sept. 8, and $1,500 a day for the teachers union if teachers are not in class and ready for students on Monday.

Rather than bargaining in good faith the district obviously chose to use the courts to force teachers back to work on the district’s terms, leaving the union with little or no bargaining power.  Well fuck that.

Just because the district can use the courts, doesn’t mean it should, and given the choice between breaking my union or paying a fine I can’t afford, I’d simply choose neither. I mean, why the hell would I want to work for bastards like that?

Of course, this contract dispute will be settled in the end—they always are—and few if any teachers will quit their jobs in the process. But the bitterness will remain, and it will surely exact a toll on the district, the teachers and the students for years to come. So while the Times vindictively celebrates the district’s victory in court, in the end, everybody loses.

As reported on BlatherWatch, KIRO-FM’s “Too Beautiful To Live” was in fact eponymously named, ending its on-air run about a year and nine months after it started. That’s about as long as my show lasted on KIRO, and while I’ve got nothing against TBTL or its host Luke Burbank, I gotta say, in the radio business, what goes around comes around.

While it was never explicitly stated, it seemed clear at the time that I and most of the rest of my weekend and late-night colleagues were axed at least partially to make room on the payroll for the somewhat pricier TBTL. I was of course disappointed at the time, and a lot of inside-radio folks reassured me that KIRO was making a big mistake dumping me… but then, none of these radio-insiders have since offered me a show on their stations, so it was really hard to argue with KIRO’s decision from a business perspective.  In the year and a half since, the switch to FM, the advent of the PPM, and the declining radio market in general have hit KIRO hard, so despite my full spot load, and my relatively low costs, I don’t know if my show would have survived regardless.

Replacing TBTL in the slot will be the familiar (and I assume, much cheaper) voice of Frank Shires, who is nearly always wrong and incredibly uninformed, but who happens to be perhaps the nicest and most gracious person I’ve met in radio, so I wish him the best of luck. Also my best wishes to Luke, Sean and Jen… especially to Jen, who is as friendly in person as she comes off on the radio, and to the ever so easy-going Sean, who as my first board-op made my baptism-by-fire radio debut so much less frightening and disastrous than it should’ve been.

And finally, here’s my fervent wish that KIRO and its newsroom survives this economic and audience downturn and eventually comes back stronger than ever.  I came to KIRO merely to do my own liberal thing, but it was when I had the privilege of keeping listeners company and informed during the 2006 wind storm and power outage that I learned what an incredible resource a radio station could be to a region. We would all benefit to see KIRO return to its live and local glory, regardless of who is behind the mic.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXFHXqrrJ6g[/youtube]

Oops.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A U.S. Coast Guard training exercise set off a security scare in Washington’s Potomac River on Friday as the United States marked the eighth anniversary of the September 11 attacks.

That’s bizarre, almost beyond belief. My tee-vee says President Obama was at the Pentagon for memorial services.

Civil wars have consequences.

Seattle Jew is planning to attend the Glenn Beck event, and he needs your help:

As a non violent demonstration, I would like to be accompanied by one or more liberals carrying (legally) holstered (unloaded)firearms. Realistic stage weapons or blank guns are also welcome buy I am informed that these will also require carry permits.

Don’t own a gun myself, but I’d love to see the reaction of the crowd to a cadre of armed liberals.

A lot of you have probably already seen the photo of Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) heckling President Barack Obama, but did you notice that carefully coifed head of silver hair just beneath him? Why that’s Rep. Dave Reichert (R-WA) of course.

And apparently, Reichert isn’t just close to Wilson in terms of physical proximity. A quick search of OpenSecrets.org finds Reichert has received three contributions totaling $5,000 from Wilson, via his Carolina Majority PAC.

So considering his close relationship with Wilson, I’d be curious to hear what Reichert has to say about his patron’s inappropriate outburst, and whether he too believes that President Obama “lied” in stating that his plan would not insure illegal immigrants?

UPDATE:
You know what else Reichert and Wilson have in common? The uncommon ability to inspire unprecedented generosity… for their opponents. Since heckling the President last night, over 10,000 individuals have contributed over $350,000 to the campaign of Wilson’s challenger, Rob Miller, over $179,000 of it coming via Daily Kos alone, prompting elections analyst Charlie Cook to downgrade Wilson’s reelection prospects.

Send a few bucks of your own Miller’s way, and send a very loud message back to Rep. Wilson.

On Monday I compared Fox Noise lunatic Glenn Beck to deceased Wisconsin Senator Joseph R. McCarthy, and I asked:

Which obscure administration or member of Congress will be next? Will it it be a third under-secretary for African affairs, or will it be, um, YOU?

And today we found out the answer. From Huffington Post:

Glenn Beck has struck again.

Yosi Sergant, who recently popped up on Beck’s radar for his involvement in a conference call on national service, has been asked to resign as communications director by the National Endowment for the Arts, sources familiar with the move tell the Huffington Post.

At issue was an August conference call in which the NEA encouraged select artists to participate in an administration project dubbed “United We Serve” and led by the first lady.

Beck attacked Sergant and the NEA on his Fox News talk show, accusing the agency of propaganda efforts similar to those used by Nazi Germany. And now Sergant has been tossed overboard, making him Beck’s second victim in his campaign to rid the administration of perceived radicals, socialists, communists, fascists, anarchists and all other manner of nefarious influences.

Perhaps not coincidentally, both Sergant and Van Jones – Beck’s first takedown – have roots in on-the-ground organizing and were tightly connected with the grassroots progressive community.

While an update to the HuffPo piece reports the NEA says Sergant will remain at the agency, stepping down from a leadership type position, it’s pretty clear that Beck and his neo-McCarthyite followers will stop at nothing to smear anyone in the administration they can, no matter how ridiculous the charges. (I mean, go to search.gov on your own if you want. I got gardening and food banks, how very Third Reich.)

And to top it all off, the Evergreen Freedom Foundation is bringing Beck to Seattle on Sept. 26 for an appearance at Safeco Field.

Now, it’s not really surprising that EFFWA would bring in Beck, because that’s what they do with their seemingly unlimited budget of far-right foundation money that comes from god-knows-where. But as this is yet another instance of the noise machine operating in concert with libertard stink tanks, you’d think an enterprising reporter might plan on delving into it all here in the next two weeks or so.

Or will it just be presented as “hey, look, Glenn Beck is at the ballyard, he must be genuinely popular!”

Is there a traditional reporter left in Seattle with the guts to wade through the baseless and bizarre statements Beck makes on a routine basis?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3l9-eT9WzPY[/youtube]

Substantive policy aside, the two biggest highlights from President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform speech last night came within seconds of each other, and both involved the utterance of the “L” word. Of course, I’m talking about the word “lie.”

The first instance came from the President himself, in refuting one of the must absurdly false allegations being lobbed by opponents of reform, and his bluntness was welcome:

“Some of people’s concerns have grown out of bogus claims spread by those whose only agenda is to kill reform at any cost. The best example is the claim made not just by radio and cable talk show hosts, but by prominent politicians, that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens. Now, such a charge would be laughable if it weren’t so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple.”

By “prominent politicians” President Obama was likely referring to Sarah Palin amongst others, and by “lie” he was accusing them of making false statements with the deliberate intent to deceive. “Lie” is a strong word, and one that should not be bandied about lightly by a person of such stature as the President of the United States, but in this instance its usage was both apt and appropriate.

No doubt Palin is not the most informed politician ever to strut across the national stage, but when she repeats the same false statement over and over again, even after being repeatedly and thoroughly fact-checked, refuted and rebutted, it is more than fair to accuse her of lying.  And in a policy debate of such import as that in which we are now engaged, mere gainsaying is not sufficient; it was absolutely crucial for the President to blow up this particularly pernicious lie, and in no uncertain words.

The truth is, people lie. The ability to lie marks a recognizable milestone in every toddler’s cognitive development, and this talent to consciously deceive is one of the uniquely human traits that separates us from most of the rest of the animal kingdom. Indeed, if lying were not such a basic element of everday human interaction, its prohibition would not be the most frequently violated of the Ten Commandments.

And yet, despite the abstract cliche of “lying politicians,” you will almost never read the “L” word printed in the polite pages of our family newspapers. Oh, they’ll fact-check and refute the claims of politicians, they’ll highlight disputes, and even occasionally label statements as clearly false. But they’ll almost never imply intent by accusing a politician or public figure of spreading actual “lies.”

That’s what I found so refreshing… not that President Obama refuted the other side’s lies, but that he bluntly called them as such.

The second use of the word “lie” last night was not nearly as refreshing, but in a way, just as welcome, when Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) heckled the President by screaming “You lie!” from the floor of the chambers:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyTelRaoBAI[/youtube]

Of course, Wilson’s use of the “L” word couldn’t be more different than the President’s. The death panel allegations are demonstrably false, yet continue to be repeated by prominent politicians well after having been thoroughly disproved; these are indeed lies, plain and simple. But while Wilson might dispute President Obama’s assertion that his proposal would not insure illegal immigrants, “you lie” is not a refutation, and there is absolutely no evidence or consensus that Obama’s statement was false, let alone said with the intent to deceive.

I repeat, the word “lie” should not be bandied about lightly, and yet that’s exactly what Rep. Wilson did.

But of course the biggest difference between the President’s use of the “L” word and that of Rep. Wilson was the context, for the latter came from a US representative, heckling from the floor of the chambers, during a presidential address to a joint session of Congress… a violation of Congressional decorum the likes of which I have never before seen.

Whether Rep. Wilson felt free to interrupt the President because he is a black man, or merely a Democrat, I do not know. But I welcome his show of disrespect because it clearly illustrates the self-destructive naivete of attempting to work with congressional Republicans in an honestly bipartisan fashion, and expecting Republicans to honestly respond in kind. The current class of Republicans do not respect Democrats, do not respect President Obama and do not even respect the Office of the President when occupied by anyone other than their own… which means they do not respect the institution at all. Bipartisanship cannot be imposed unilaterally, and without at least the grudging respect of the party on the other side, would be an ultimately futile and self-defeating pursuit for anything more than rhetorical purposes.

Last night’s speech should be a turning point in the debate on healthcare reform, not just because the President clearly laid out the case for his proposals, but because Rep. Wilson clearly illustrated the petty, hateful and obstructionist nature of the Republican opposition.

No doubt there are many Republicans in Congress who find Rep. Wilson’s behavior dishonorable, but if they wish to avoid being painted with the same broad brush they must do more than merely criticize their colleague or even censure him. They must now prove themselves to be a loyal opposition, or else risk having their own call for bipartisanship demonstrably proven to be a lie.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZEofSOQYJU[/youtube]

[via Scott Morgan]

Still waiting for updates on the court cases happening this week in Washington.

Just got in, only heard snippets of President Barack Obama’s speech on health care. What I heard sounded good. Cesspool?

Yesterday marked the six month anniversary of our state’s Death With Dignity Act. Compassion & Choices of Washington, a group that works to make sure the law works for both patients and doctors, announced that 16 Washington residents have passed away since taking advantage of the new law, 11 of whom actually used the prescription to control the time and manner of their passing. None of these events are cause for celebration, but merely a recognition that the terminally ill in this state have more choices than the residents of 48 other states, and that’s something that we should be proud of here.

Claudia Rowe covered the milestone nicely for the PI, but as she points out, opponents of the new law still aren’t doing a very good job of dealing with reality:

But no number of physician-assisted deaths — however small it may be — is small enough for opponents of the law. Eileen Geller, a hospice nurse and spokeswoman for True Compassion Advocates, believes that merely discussing the issue implies that hastening death is a valid option for the sick and vulnerable.

“It’s not just the few who have used this, but all the other Washingtonians who are receiving the message that they should die prematurely and unnaturally,” Geller said. “I’ve received calls from people who are worried and wondering, ‘Maybe I shouldn’t receive treatment. Maybe I should give up.'”

I have a very simple suggestion for Geller. Tell these people the truth. Tell them that giving people choices is in no way forcing them into a particular choice. Tell them that the law is not meant in any way to encourage people to die prematurely and unnaturally. Tell them that the law is meant for people who have very strong feelings about being able to control the time and place of their passing.

What’s most frustrating about this is that the reason that Washingtonians are “receiving the message that they should die prematurely and unnaturally” is not because of the law, but because people like Eileen Geller spent much of last year misleading people into thinking that that’s what the law was meant to do. It’s as if we pass health care reform this year, and then next year Sarah Palin finds that people keep telling her they’re worried about imaginary “Death Panels” and blames that phenomenon on Obama.

It’s one thing to be – like Palin – dishonest for the sake of your political prospects and potential income streams. It’s another thing altogether to be dishonest out of pure paranoia. If there are large numbers of people in this state having sleepless nights about the Death With Dignity law, it’s not the fault of the law. It’s the fault of those like Geller who act as if they’ll break out into hives if they simply tell the truth about what this law does and doesn’t do.

Another family values conservative gets caught “hiking the Appalachian trail”…and without his boots (ick!):

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n50ZiCFhIyg[/youtube]

As reported yesterday on Publicola, Susan Hutchison has substantially trailed Dow Constantine in the all important money race since the August primary. But Constantine supporters should not grow complacent, nor Hutchison fans too discouraged, because as I reported several weeks back, GOP stalwart John Stanton had been quietly promising to wage a million dollar “independent” expenditure campaign on Hutchison’s behalf.

Hutchison’s inability to keep up with her earlier fundraising pace stems mostly from the fact that the bulk of her money came in the form of double-max donations; she simply can’t legally tap much of her ultra-wealthy base a second time. But there’s no limit to how much one can give to “independent” expenditure campaigns, and that’s the beauty of Stanton’s alleged efforts.

We’ll have no idea how much Stanton and his Republican cohorts really raise until the money is spent, but considering what’s at stake in this race, especially for powerful developers seeking to crawl out from underneath our growth management statutes, a million dollars seems like a small price to pay.