HorsesAss.Org

Now that we’re in the middle (or, probably at the beginning) of our third war, can we maybe do the things we’re supposed to do during a war? Start with a tax increase. After all, those cruise missiles and fighter jets aren’t free. If this war is worth it, (and I have my doubts) then it’s worth paying for.

Of course the people risking their lives, not to mention their health and their relations back home, are the men and women in the air and at sea, and possibly in the future on the ground. We need to make sure that when they come home, the VA is in as tip top shape as possible, and that when people come back, they have the physical health, mental health, and family support they’ve earned. We need to make sure they have jobs to come back to. Especially since so many of the people deployed are in the National Guard and Reserves, it means we need to do everything we can to make sure they can return to the lives they’ve left, sometimes two and three times. It means their jobs have to still be there for them government agencies like ESGR need support and private businesses need to be willing to hire and to go above the bare minimum required by law in retaining and supporting their service member employees.

But those of us who don’t ever suit up ought to sacrifice in other ways. We need a renewed push away from oil in the short term because that’s where Gadhafi gets his money and in the longer term because we’ve been in a hot war in the Middle East for a decade, and it doesn’t show signs of stopping. We ought to consider rationing, to force us to use less oil.

Finally, it’s not the time for business to make profit. They can return to that when our 3 wars are over. Now is not the time, as FDR said for, “that small group of selfish men who would clip the wings of the American eagle in order to feather their own nests.” We need to tell all military contractors (including Boeing) that they’ll be delivering quality products, and doing it at cost. If they don’t like it, we’ll have to nationalize the factories at least until our wars are over. Same with the extraction industries. We really ought to nationalize oil drilling. At least enough that the operations in our 3 wars aren’t dependent on corporations. If the oil companies don’t like it, well there are wars on.

State Sen. Phil Rockefeller (D-23) makes the case for ending some of the 567 special tax preferences on the books in Washington:

Faced with a deep state deficit and deep cuts to vital services we should look first at ending unjustified tax breaks.

Many breaks on the books subsidize a privileged few at the expense of ordinary citizens. The notion of tax fairness, that everyone pays his or her fair share for core services that benefit everyone, has been trampled under the feet of special interest lobbyists.

These tax breaks are conveniently embedded in obscure tax law and routinely ignored, yet they divert billions of dollars into wealthy pockets. As a result, essential public services like education and health care are starved for funding.

Rockefeller admits that passage of I-1053 make the task more difficult. Given the widespread opinion that the 2/3 majority requirement of I-1053 would not pass Constitutional muster, if only we could get into the courts, why not use the budget crisis to force a showdown?

Here’s how it works. Declare that the projected revenue shortfall, following a biennium where spending has already been cut to the bone, makes it impossible for the legislature to pass a budget that lives up to the spirit of Article IX, Section 1 of the State Constitution:

It is the paramount duty of the state to make ample provision for the education of all children residing within its borders, without distinction or preference on account of race, color, caste, or sex.

The constitutional requirement of “ample provision for education…” simply isn’t happening.

Article IX, Section 3 gives lawmakers broad authority to do what is needed to fund education. If we cannot provide “ample” funding for education via existing taxes, lawmakers should provide short-term revenue for education through the repeal of tax preferences, using a simple majority to pass the legislation.

The mandate and the authority to accomplish it as spelled out in the Constitution trumps a law enacted through the initiative process. If Republicans believe the law trumps…they can sue.

But would they sue? The reality is that I-1053 is most potent when it stays out of the courts. The threat to I-1053 is serious enough that, perhaps, a bill to repeal tax preferences might just get that 2/3 majority as a way to avoid Judicial scrutiny.

As a certain Mayor-elect puts it:

“You don’t ever want a crisis to go to waste; it’s an opportunity to do important things that you would otherwise avoid.”

Last week’s contest was won by mlc1us. It was the construction site for what eventually became the set of Wipeout, just outside of Los Angeles.

Here’s this week’s, a location within Washington State, good luck!

Exodus 31:15
Whosoever doeth any work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death.

Discuss.

I didn’t see this in time to put it in this week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza, but here is an interview from NPR”s On the Media with James O’Keefe—you know, that kid who keeps releasing surprising sting videos that later turn out to be misleadingly edited.

At the end of the interview, On the Media has a little editing fun of their own.

It appears that military action by the French is under way in Libya. I find myself in agreement with the decision to take action, even if some of the potential risks do worry me. I’ve seen a lot of chatter in various places trying to make comparisons to how we went into Iraq, but this really isn’t comparable. Besides the fact that the war we launched in Iraq was promoted disingenuously in a number of different ways – and was designed from the outset to be an occupation – this is a military action for which the Arab world is largely welcoming our involvement.

That’s not to say that it couldn’t backfire, it sure as hell could. While it still appears to me that Gaddafi has next to no support among the Libyan population, a misstep or two could cause some Libyans to rally around him. And the Obama Administration’s mishandling and misunderstanding of the situation in Afghanistan always makes me nervous about their willingness to be optimistic when optimism isn’t warranted. But overall, I think Fareed Zakaria’s point here is the one thing that overrides everything else:

Now the U.S. has the opportunity to break the dysfunctional dynamic that produces anti-American hatred and violence. The Obama Administration has properly aligned itself with the hopes and aspirations of the Arab people, and it has called for governments in the region to engage in serious reform. But right now all these efforts have been sidelined. Libya is burning. Its people rose, and the tyrant gunned them down. Unless something changes, Muammar Gaddafi and his sons will be able to reassert control over the country amid a mass slaughter of its civilians.

This would be a terrible outcome. President Obama has made it unambiguously clear that he wants Gaddafi to step down. The U.S. is actively seeking his ouster. To have him survive would be a humiliation for Washington at a moment and in a region where its words still have great impact. It would also send a disastrous signal to the other rulers of the region — in Syria, Algeria, Iran — that Mubarak made a mistake and that the way to stay in office is to engage in mass slaughter, scare the U.S. away and wait out the sanctions and isolation. America would lose its opportunity to align with the rising forces of the Arab world.

This is a crucial moment for the Obama Administration, and how this is handled will go a long way towards helping our hurting the more serious problems in the region. Like Bahrain.

The Republican War on Workers:

• Thom: latest protest in Wisconsin.
• Young Turks: Maine Governor — Screw teachers, help rich.
• Pap: GOP’s Union busting is theft.
• Newsy: Dems not allowed to vote in Wisconsin.
• Dane County Judge puts restraining order on Walker’s bill (via Crooks and Liars).
• Old Walker ad shows him supporting recalls (via Crooks and Liars).

Red State Update catches up with things.

Going after NPR:

• Newsy: House votes on fate of NPR.
• Dems launch Punny defense of NPR (via TalkingPointsMemo).
• Rep. Weiner objects that NPR defunding bill doesn’t follow house rules.
• Rep. Anthony Weiner smacks down Republicans over NPR defunding (via Baloon Juice):
• Young Turks: Rep. Weiner nails it!
• Cenk on Rep. Weiner on NPR

Thom: Rep. Jan Schakowsky’s tax on millionaires and billionaires.

Lawrence O’Donnell: Michelle Bachmann fails history.

Young Turks: New tax rates for the rich?

ONN: Man becomes GOP frontrunner after showing no interest in government:

Liberal Viewer: Daily Show asks if Gitmo is prison or zoo.

Young Turks: Big God, Small Government — Senator DeMint (R-SC).

Libya:

• UN Security Council backs intervention against Gaddafi (via Crooks and Liars).
• Obama on Libya.
• Young Turks: Gaddafi on top in Libya again.

Newsy: Republicans go sour on Sarah Palin.

Pap with Joshua Holland: GOP’s Union Busting is Theft..

The Beauty of Donald Trump:

• Young Turks: Donald Trump’s $600,000,000 presidential aspirations.
• Donald Trump comes out as a Birfer (via Crooks and Liars).

Lawrence O’Donnell to Glenn Beck viewers on the apocalypse: It’s not happening.

Cenk: Glenn Beck claims “Obama sympathizes with terrorists”.

For those with vaginas:

ONN: Panel of caged average Americans weigh in on economy.

Tragedy in Japan:

• Obama offers condolences and thoughts for Japan.
• Cenk: Glenn Beck jokes about Japan.
• Rush laughs about destruction in Japan.
• Newsy: Japan’s nuclear plant workers hailed as heros.
• Mark Fiore: Disaster.
• Obama standing with Japan.
• Newsy: New tactics emerge in Japan.
• Japan’s nuclear plant explodes.
• Ed destroys FAUX News’ “no looting in Japan” meme (via TalkingPointsMemo).
• A second nuclear plant explodes.
• Maddow: what survival looks like (via Crooks and Liars).
• Lawrence O’Donnell: On radiation.
• Radioactive plume headed for the West Coast.

TYTUniversity: Wingnutcase David Horowitz ‘Nazi, racist’ Muslims speech & student interview.

Shooting Illegals like Pigs:

• Young Turks: Shooting illegals like pigs.
• Pap: Republicans say let’s kill immigrants like wild pigs.
• Lawrence O’Donnell: shooting brown people like hogs.

Young Turks: Sarah Palin destroyed by conservatives.

Bill Maher: Governing with the G.O.P. is like rooming with a meth addict (via TalkingPointsMemo):

White House: West Wing Week.

Sam Seder: Tim Pawlenty’s amazing vocal stylings.

Ed and Pap: The The Republican court-packing scam.

Young Turks: She’s baaaaaaaak…Sharron Angle runs for congress.

Newsy: Will Hillary Clinton exit the political stage?

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

Remember when the nutcase Republicans were saying stupid shit about the IRS collecting personal health information in order to enforce Obamacare? Take, for instance, this doozy from Fox Nation:

IRS Hiring Thousands of Armed Tax Agents to Enforce Obamacare?

[…]
Under the new law, the IRS is required to fine taxpayers thousands of dollars if they do not purchase health insurance. In order for the government to enforce compliance, tax authorities will need information, for the first time, about people’s health care.

Wow…you can just envision an IRS agent pointing a gun at your head telling you to divulge intimate medical details about yourself. Gosh…that sounds scary.

(I’m only surprised they didn’t claim that Agents would be armed by mass confiscation of guns following passage of Obama’s next legislative assault on America: new gun control laws.)

At least there were no gun-wielding IRS agents in the congressional Republican’s take on it:

A new analysis by the Joint Economic Committee and the House Ways & Means Committee minority staff estimates up to 16,500 new IRS personnel will be needed to collect, examine and audit new tax information mandated on families and small businesses in the ‘reconciliation’ bill being taken up by the U.S. House of Representatives this weekend.

“When most people think of health care reform they think of more doctors exams, not more IRS exams,” says U.S. Congressman Kevin Brady, the top House Republican on the Joint Economic Committee. “Isn’t the federal government already intruding enough into our lives? We need thousands of new doctors and nurses in America, not thousands more IRS agents.”

Of course, the whole thing was a lie manufactured to capitalize on fear of the IRS in order to sway public opinion against health care reforms.

Or was it a lie? (Via MoJo):

Under a GOP-backed bill expected to sail through the House of Representatives, the Internal Revenue Service would be forced to police how Americans have paid for their abortions. To ensure that taxpayers complied with the law, IRS agents would have to investigate whether certain terminated pregnancies were the result of rape or incest. And one tax expert says that the measure could even lead to questions on tax forms: Have you had an abortion? Did you keep your receipt?

Wait…this is just hyperbole invented by MSNBC or spewed by a flawed analysis from a minority party House committee, right?

In testimony to a House taxation subcommittee on Wednesday, Thomas Barthold, the chief of staff of the nonpartisan Joint Tax Committee, confirmed that one consequence of the Republicans’ “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act” would be to turn IRS agents into abortion cops—that is, during an audit, they’d have to detemine, from evidence provided by the taxpayer, whether any tax benefit had been inappropriately used to pay for an abortion.
[…]

“Were this to become law, people could end up in an audit, the subject of which could be abortion, rape, and incest,” says Christopher Bergin, the head of Tax Analysts, a nonpartisan, not-for-profit tax policy group. “If you pass the law like this, the IRS would be required to enforce it.”

Keep classy, G.O.P. congresscritters!

The expression may be hackneyed, but…this really is a classic case of Wingnut Projection.

Remember folks…when the Republicans accuse Democrats of something outrageously over-the-top, you can be pretty sure it’s because they are planning to do something similar. (Or are actually doing it already…You know, like Newt Gingrich going after Clinton for adultery.)

And that, oddly enough, leads to my financial tip of the day: If Republicans make gains in 2012 in the Senate or the Executive-branch, then before they are sworn in…take out a big fat live insurance policy on Granny.

Here’s an amazing story mixed into the hell in Japan.

The life-long rice farmer lived alone in a house, now flooded, when the earthquake and tsunami hit. She told CNN:

“After the tsunami warning, I got on my bicycle, by myself, and rode away.”

It’s a staple of the mudslinging in comment threads at various political blogs, in response to right-wing trolls, to wonder who’s paying them. Now, thanks to an article in today’s Guardian UK, we know at least one of the answers: We are.

The US military is developing software that will let it secretly manipulate social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter by using fake online personas to influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda.

A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with United States Central Command (Centcom), which oversees US armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, to develop what is described as an “online persona management service” that will allow one US serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world….

The discovery that the US military is developing false online personalities – known to users of social media as “sock puppets” – could also encourage other governments, private companies and non-government organisations to do the same.

The Centcom contract stipulates that each fake online persona must have a convincing background, history and supporting details, and that up to 50 US-based controllers should be able to operate false identities from their workstations “without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries”.

Three thoughts. First, this report is that the US military is seeking to develop software that would at least partially automate what can easily be done at most any Web site or Facebook or Twitter account by hand. It’s therefore reasonable to assume that the US military (along with how many other government agencies?) is already doing this, just not as efficiently as the new software would allow.

Secondly, the US government is prohibited by law from propagandizing US citizens (insert laugh track here), and since online communities have no international borders, even if they’re based overseas, that’s exactly what these efforts would do. This is not just a breach of online etiquette. It’s a crime.

Third: why, oh why, does it always seem to be a British or other foreign media outlet that first reports these stories? I’m just sayin’…

Updates on the various drug law reform items I’ve been following:

– Yesterday, former U.S. Attorney for Western Washington John McKay, along with former police officer Tim Burgess and Seattle City Attorney Pete Holmes, encouraged the state legislature to legalize marijuana and have it sold in state liquor stores. At the very least, I’d like to see a vote on this bill. There are a lot of legislators in this state who talk a good game on the budget, and it’d be interesting to see how many of them have the courage to put politics aside and walk the walk.

– The trial of medical marijuana provider Bryan Gabriel ended with a hung jury. Eight jurors found him not guilty, three found him guilty, and one was undecided. It’s not known yet whether King County Prosecutors will attempt to retry him, but I have trouble believing that they would. The case they had against Gabriel was laughable (and it’s worth pointing out that they filed these charges on the day Snoqualmie Police were forced to return 10 ounces of medical marijuana to him from a different sting operation – and 15 months after the alleged transaction took place). In trial, they had no audio or video evidence, no fingerprints, and the person to whom Gabriel allegedly sold the bag wouldn’t even testify under oath. Only Snoqualmie Police officers took the stand for the prosecution. If Satterberg’s office balked at bringing charges against Ian Birk because they wouldn’t be able to win a conviction, then what the hell was this?

– On Monday there were a number of raids across Montana shutting down marijuana production facilities. Just as in Washington, Montana has legalized the use of medical marijuana, but hasn’t established a network of distribution to supply their patients. But unlike here in Washington – where we’re on the verge of legalizing both dispensaries and licensed grows – their legislature tried to repeal their still-popular medical marijuana law. As the Montana State Senate deadlocked on the repeal bill, the Obama Administration’s DEA began shutting down the facilities across the state anyway. Because these facilities were operating outside state law, this wasn’t a violation of Obama’s stated position on medical marijuana, but this certainly appears to be a case where the Obama Administration is working closely with Montana’s Republicans to gut a law that both the people of the state and the state’s Democrats both support. There’s no excuse for that.

Last year I put up my favorite poem by William Butler Yeats. I think a yearly Yeats is appropriate.

Hound Voice

Because we love bare hills and stunted trees
And were the last to choose the settled ground,
Its boredom of the desk or of the spade, because
So many years companioned by a hound,
Our voices carry; and though slumber-bound,
Some few half wake and half renew their choice,
Give tongue, proclaim their hidden name — ‘hound voice.’

The women that I picked spoke sweet and low
And yet gave tongue. ‘Hound voices’ were they all.
We picked each other from afar and knew
What hour of terror comes to test the soul,
And in that terror’s name obeyed the call,
And understood, what none have understood,
Those images that waken in the blood.

Some day we shall get up before the dawn
And find our ancient hounds before the door,
And wide awake know that the hunt is on;
Stumbling upon the blood-dark track once more,
Then stumbling to the kill beside the shore;
Then cleaning out and bandaging of wounds,
And chants of victory amid the encircling hounds.

After reading The Stranger’s coverage of the police department recently, I can’t help but think that beat cops shouldn’t have guns under normal circumstances.

I don’t mean to suggest that all, or most, of the Seattle Police can’t handle a firearm. They’ve all had psychological screening and extensive training. Uniformly, I’ve only had good experiences with Seattle police. But all it took was one bad day for one officer to put a wood carver in the ground. The day would have been better for Williams and for Birk if Birk hadn’t been armed that day. We’re told that these sorts of incidents of police shooting people are inevitable, but if we disarm the sort of people who think “Ian Birk is a good young man” we’ll probably have fewer of those sorts of incidents.

And I know the region has had a spate of police officers murdered recently. There are people gunning for our officers, sadly literally. Still their weapons didn’t save them from those premeditated murders. And in the case of Clemmons, since he took an officer’s gun, he was more dangerous because the police were armed. Shootings of officers in Britain where the police on the street don’t carry weapons is fairly infrequent (obviously there are other reasons).

I’m not arguing there is no place for any police officer in any circumstance to have a weapon. But it should be the exceptional case, not the norm.

I’m currently on the seventh floor of the King County Courthouse building in downtown Seattle. The jury is deliberating in the trial of Bryan Gabriel, the medical marijuana provider at the center of the tragic circumstances from last June that I wrote about here, in which a medical marijuana patient named Jeff Roetter died during an epileptic seizure as Snoqualmie police were pressuring him to testify against Gabriel. The charges that Gabriel currently faces are unrelated to Roetter, but were curiously filed the exact same day that Snoqualmie police were forced by a judge to return 10 ounces of marijuana to Gabriel.

The reason I’m even able to be here today, though, is that yesterday was my last day of work at the job I’ve been at since late 2008. I don’t write much about my actual day job since I let work and blogging co-mingle a bit too much at Microsoft. I work much harder to keep the two things separate (which I make easy for myself by being a shitty blogger with a relatively small audience). This past job was even easier for me to do that, since a lot of the people I worked with weren’t local, and I became a father in 2009 – giving me even less time to write shitty posts.

My career is in software quality assurance (QA). I’ve worked on airplanes, office productivity products, online music systems, statistical modeling applications, and large-scale data warehouses. My career has presented me with numerous challenges and I genuinely like the process of having to solve difficult problems. In this most recent job, I succeeded in climbing up into management and got a different perspective on how QA is done and a better perspective on how large projects are managed and – more commonly – mismanaged.

But this experience has also made me ponder the parallels between how QA functions within a company building a commercial product and how government functions within a society. Working on flight control software at Boeing early on in my career, I saw the overlap between them, as the FAA worked directly with us in our certification efforts. While it’s true that Boeing cares a lot about safety, I’ve worked at enough places since then to know that corporate bottom lines are often the most immovable objects, and that FAA presence within the group was both welcome and necessary. It made it easier for those of us in QA to demand enough time to complete our job.

At many other places, that isn’t always the case. QA efforts are often undermanned and underfunded, and yet still end up taking the blame when things go wrong. Developers and sometimes even program management fail to see the value that QA provides until a horrendous bug is found in a production system that probably would’ve been found by that QA engineer that you laid off last year. It’s one of the basic tenets of software development that the longer it takes for you to find a bug, the more it costs you. You know QA has done their job well when you aren’t constantly reminded of how important they are.

This isn’t an argument to have government regulation for all types of software development. Most commercial software development doesn’t impact public safety the way that airplanes do, and companies survive or fail based upon the quality of the products they produce (and they often don’t, but that’s a whole other post) without us needing to interfere with that process. But the parallels to government and how it’s seen in our society is what this post is about.

At the town hall I attended last weekend, Republican State Rep Jay Rodne complained that the state Department of Transportation had 5000 engineers on its staff. He seemed utterly incredulous at this statistic, as if he’d discovered some secret cabal that’s bleeding the taxpayers of Washington state dry. He didn’t provide any examples of waste. In his mind, the mere presence of the workers is an indication of wastefulness. This is religion dressed up as politics, a belief that a public sector employee or any public project is inherently a drain on society.

One can easily look on the WSDOT page to see what those engineers work on. Currently featured is the work being done on the Alaskan Way Viaduct for earthquake preparedness. These are things that you tend to notice only when they’re not done right – or not done at all. And when you decide to skimp on those things, just like in the software world, you can end up costing yourself far more in the long run.

My latest work experience was a frustrating one. Without going into too much detail, it involved significant budget cutting to our QA groups, including an offshoring push. The efforts to rein in costs made it very difficult to do proper QA on a number of their systems, potentially costing them far more in the long run. They closed down our office before I got to see how it all unfolded, but with some free time inbetween jobs, I’ll have some extra time to watch what happens in our greater society as we continue to take the same approach with government programs – eliminating workers whose value is often underappreciated, and taking away projects whose presence keeps overall costs down.

No…this isn’t about Japan. It’s about SeaTac and American travelers:

The Transportation Security Administration is re-analyzing the radiation levels of X-ray body scanners installed in airports nationwide, after testing produced dramatically higher-than-expected results.

The TSA, which has deployed at least 500 body scanners to at least 78 airports, said Tuesday the machines meet all safety standards and would remain in operation despite a “calculation error” in safety studies. The flawed results showed radiation levels 10 times higher than expected.

You know who is going to be gloating over this, don’t you?

Goldy:

I, for one, will refuse to allow my daughter through one of those scanners, and will refuse to walk through one myself. […] I mean, honestly… would you trust TSA to bombard you or a loved one with ionizing radiation?

You know who is laughing over this, don’t you?

The “terrorists”. You know…the ones who “hate our freedoms.”

“They” have scared the living shit out of politicians, driving them to a state of frenzied security overreaction. It isn’t just the trillion dollar wars, the costly military build-up, the absurdly bloated domestic security infrastructure…those things that have drained our coffers with little substantive return on investment. It isn’t just the disgrace of our government getting caught committing torture in our names and starting wars under false pretenses that have killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people.

For our dignity, it’s also a “death” by 1,000 cuts. We’ve succumbed to ludicrous restrictions and procedures for air travel and we’ve accepted those increasingly invasive inspections.

We’ve taken it to the extreme of “mainstreaming” the use of full body scanning using ionizing radiation administered by non-radiologists on equipment that, it turns out, was being inspected erroneously.

Ultimately we, the American electorate, by putting up with this shit, are self-terrorists.

I always opt out…and go for the free TSA massage.

Update:

Commenter Oxbrain takes me to task for fear-mongering. I’ll respond here, because I believe it will add some clarity to a post that was minimally about radiation and more about overreaction to terrorism.

“Your title is “Radiation “emissions are 10 times higher”” Taking the quote out of context as it is, this is a blatantly false statement that is obviously intended to strike at a fear of radiation.”

The title is not a statement. But I understand the point. The title is alarmist…I mean, given the context of concerns over the situation in Japan. But the purpose of the over-the-top title was to draw eyeballs. Incendiary titles are a tradition in blogging. I just wish they could all be as good as “Asshole inflamed over anuses”.

“I can’t imagine the mental disconnect required to try using an irrational fear of radiation as an argument against our irrational fear of terrorism.”

I appreciate your point, I really do. But what is rational about fear of radiation is that mistakes can, and will, happen. (Yes…even by a government agency.) That the particular mistake (one of several) highlighted in the article was not a radiation health threat, as the article made explicit, isn’t much comfort. It was still a mistake. The tests yielded numbers 10 times too high.

Apparently, someone at the TSA charged with reviewing the test results from the contractor, wasn’t surprised, or even curious about readings that were, apparently, ten-times too high. That’s not good.

And that wasn’t the only mistake. The TSA report cited other problems with the inspections:

• Lack of notation for the latest calibration date for the machine being tested or the most recent calibration date noted had expired on survey meters
• Information missing regarding warning labels and required labels
• Calculation errors not impacting safety
• Missing survey point readings
• Inconsistent responses to survey questions
• No reading of background radiation noted
• Missing other non-measurement related information

(For context, I’ll just note that a missing placard on an aircraft renders it legally unairworthy.)

These errors add poignancy to Goldy’s question: do you trust the TSA to expose you to ionizing radiation?

So…yeah, I think it works using the irrational fear of radiation as an argument against the irrational fear of terrorism. Clearly people’s irrational fear of terrorism is so…well, irrational, that people succumb to it over their irrational fear of radiation and their rational fear that mistakes can happen.