HorsesAss.Org

  • Home
  • About HA
  • Advertise
  • Archives
  • Donate

Poll Analysis: Romney takes back a couple more

by Darryl — Wednesday, 10/3/12, 3:09 pm


Obama Romney
100.0% probability of winning 0.0% probability of winning
Mean of 342 electoral votes Mean of 196 electoral votes

Electoral College Map

Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Lousiana Maine Maryland Massachusettes Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia D.C. Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Electoral College Map

Georgia Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Delaware Connecticut Florida Mississippi Alabama Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia D.C. Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

The previous analysis had President Barack Obama leading Gov. Mitt Romney by 344 to 194 electoral votes. Obama’s victory margin was “statistically significant,” as the analysis suggested he would win an election now with certainty.

There were a plethora of new polls released in the last couple of days. So now, after a Monte Carlo analysis using 100,000 simulated elections, informed entirely by state head-to-head polls, Obama wins 100,000 times and Romney wins 0 times. Obama receives (on average) 342 (-2) to Romney’s 196 (+2) electoral votes.

This is two consecutive analyses in which Mitt Romney has gained electoral votes. Is this the end of the Convention bump for Obama? Will Romney be able to keep adding a couple of electoral votes a day?

If so, with 34 days to go, he’d still lose by five—with only 264 electoral votes. In other words, to win, Romney needs to shake loose more than two electoral votes a day, on average, through election day.

That’s the analysis. The big picture in this race can be seen from the time trends from a series of elections simulated every seven days using polls from 03-Oct-2011 to 03-Oct-2012, and including polls from the preceding 21 days (FAQ).


Here are the new polls included:

start end sample % % %
st poll date date size MOE O R diff
AZ Arizona 01-Oct 03-Oct 594 4.0 44 53 R+9
CO WeAskAmerica 25-Sep 27-Sep 1273 2.8 49.3 45.5 O+3.8
FL Marist 30-Sep 01-Oct 890 3.3 47 46 O+1
FL Gravis Marketing 29-Sep 30-Sep 914 3.4 49.0 48.4 O+0.6
FL Suffolk 27-Sep 30-Sep 600 4.0 45.8 43.2 O+2.7
IA WeAskAmerica 25-Sep 27-Sep 1273 2.8 47.5 43.7 O+3.8
LA SMOR 11-Sep 20-Sep 600 4.0 39 45 R+6
MD Baltimore Sun 25-Sep 27-Sep 804 3.5 57 34 O+23
MA WBUR 26-Sep 28-Sep 504 4.4 60 32 O+28
MI WeAskAmerica 25-Sep 27-Sep 1064 3.1 52.0 39.9 O+12.1
MO PPP 01-Oct 03-Oct 700 3.7 45 51 R+6
MO WeAskAmerica 25-Sep 27-Sep 1145 2.9 44.5 47.7 R+3.2
MO Gravis Marketing 16-Sep 17-Sep 1959 2.3 39.3 47.7 R+8.4
NV WeAskAmerica 25-Sep 27-Sep 1078 3.1 52.5 42.0 O+10.5
NH U NH 27-Sep 30-Sep 600 4.0 54 39 O+15
NH PPP 24-Sep 25-Sep 862 3.3 51.0 43.5 O+7.5
NJ Eagleton-Rutgers 27-Sep 30-Sep 645 4.0 56 37 O+19
NM Rasmussen 27-Sep 27-Sep 500 4.5 51 40 O+11
NM WeAskAmerica 25-Sep 27-Sep 1258 2.9 50.9 40.6 O+10.3
NC Rasmussen 02-Oct 02-Oct 500 4.5 47 51 R+4
NC SurveyUSA 29-Sep 01-Oct 573 4.2 49 47 O+2
NC ARG 28-Sep 30-Sep 600 4.0 46 50 R+4
NC PPP 27-Sep 30-Sep 981 3.1 48 48 tie
OH Marist 30-Sep 01-Oct 931 3.2 51 43 O+8
OH PPP 27-Sep 30-Sep 897 3.3 49 45 O+4
RI WPRI 26-Sep 29-Sep 501 4.4 57 33 O+24
TX Texas Lyceum 10-Sep 26-Sep 1175 2.8 39 58 R+19
VA Marist 30-Sep 01-Oct 969 3.1 48 46 O+2
VA Roanoke College 19-Sep 28-Sep 589 4.0 48 40 O+8
WI Marquette 27-Sep 30-Sep 894 3.3 52.8 42.3 O+10.5

Romney has a solid lead in Arizona. He leads Obama by +9% in the new poll and also leads in the three other current polls.

Obama has a six-poll streak in Colorado, and he takes seven of the eight current polls.

Obama pulls a hat trick in Florida today. This brings Obama’s streak up to ten consecutive Florida polls. Romney only takes a couple of the earliest of the 14 current polls.

The new Iowa polls goes to Obama by +3.8%. Romney has taken two of the seven current polls and the analysis gives Obama a 99% probability of taking the state (right now).

I was a little surprised that Louisiana has Romney up by only +6% over Obama. The only other poll in the state was from a year ago and had Romney up by +16%.

A double digit lead for Obama in Michigan. Obama takes all eight current polls.

In Missouri, Romney leads Obama in all three new polls. The four current polls have Romney with a quite solid lead.

Nevada gives Obama a double digit lead over Romney. Aside from one tie, Obama leads in all seven current polls. His chances are, like, 99.5% of taking the state right now.

New Hampshire isn’t a swing state, if you believe the new poll’s +15% for Obama over Romney. That is bolstered by a +7% in another poll. The other five current polls show a narrower spread, and Romney even led in one.

In New Mexico, Obama leads Romney by +11% in one new poll and +10.3% in another. With the other +9% current poll, Obama’s chances are now at 100%.

The best news for Romney is the new pack of North Carolina polls. Two have Romney up by +4% over Obama. Obama leads in another by +2%, and the last one is a tie. Combined with the six other current polls, Obama ekes out a 50.1% to 49.9% lead, and an overall 56% probability of taking the state in an election right now.

Ohio has Obama up by +8% over Romney, but with 51%, in one poll and +4% in another. With all nine of the current polls in his favor, Obama has established a solid +6% lead that offers him 100% of the simulated elections.

Two new Virginia polls go to Obama by +2% and +8%. Obama now leads in all twelve of the current polls, giving him 100% chances with about a 6% lead expected.

A new double digit lead for Obama in Wisconsin, and all the current polls go Obama’s way.

Here is the distribution of electoral votes [FAQ] from the simulations:

What an interesting distribution! There is slightly greater than 50:50 chance that one of four outcomes would result from an election now: Obama winning by 347, 348, 333, or 332 electoral votes. The results come as pairs one electoral vote apart because of the tie in Nebraska-2.

Ten most probable electoral vote outcomes for Obama:

  • 347 electoral votes with a 14.74% probability
  • 348 electoral votes with a 14.23% probability
  • 333 electoral votes with a 12.37% probability
  • 332 electoral votes with a 11.43% probability
  • 341 electoral votes with a 3.31% probability
  • 356 electoral votes with a 3.29% probability
  • 340 electoral votes with a 2.71% probability
  • 355 electoral votes with a 2.61% probability
  • 349 electoral votes with a 2.59% probability
  • 346 electoral votes with a 2.56% probability

After 100,000 simulations:

  • Obama wins 100.0%, Romney wins 0.0%.
  • Average (SE) EC votes for Obama: 342.1 (10.1)
  • Average (SE) EC votes for Romney: 195.9 (10.1)
  • Median (95% CI) EC votes for Obama: 346 (323, 359)
  • Median (95% CI) EC votes for Romney: 192 (179, 215)

Each column of this table shows the electoral vote total aggregated by different criteria for the probability of winning a state (Safe=100%, Strong=90%+, Leans=60%+, Weak=50%+):

Threshold Safe + Strong + Leans + Weak
Safe Obama 205
Strong Obama 126 331
Leans Obama 1 1 332
Weak Obama 15 15 15 347
Weak Romney 1 1 1 191
Leans Romney 9 9 190
Strong Romney 102 181
Safe Romney 79

This table summarizes results by state. Click on the poll count to see the individual polls included for the state.

0 0 EC # Total % % Obama Romney
8 4 Votes polls Votes Obama Romney % wins % wins
AL 9 1* 404 39.6 60.4 0.2 99.8
AK 3 0* (0) (100)
AZ 11 4 2044 46.5 53.5 1.1 98.9
AR 6 1 2006 38.3 61.7 0.0 100.0
CA 55 1 915 57.6 42.4 100.0 0.0
CO 9 7 6205 51.7 48.3 97.4 2.6
CT 7 2 1193 58.8 41.2 100.0 0.0
DE 3 0 (100) (0)
DC 3 1* 94 88.3 11.7 100.0 0.0
FL 29 14 11413 51.5 48.5 98.7 1.3
GA 16 1 439 38.5 61.5 0.1 99.9
HI 4 1* 517 64.8 35.2 100.0 0.0
ID 4 0* (0) (100)
IL 20 2* 2277 58.8 41.2 100.0 0.0
IN 11 1 736 43.5 56.5 0.6 99.4
IA 6 7 4804 52.3 47.7 98.8 1.2
KS 6 2* 1143 39.4 60.6 0.0 100.0
KY 8 1 557 42.4 57.6 0.4 99.6
LA 8 1 504 46.4 53.6 12.9 87.1
ME 2 4 2536 58.4 41.6 100.0 0.0
ME1 1 1 412 63.3 36.7 100.0 0.0
ME2 1 1 364 53.8 46.2 85.9 14.1
MD 10 2 1471 61.5 38.5 100.0 0.0
MA 11 7 3708 63.0 37.0 100.0 0.0
MI 16 8 7283 54.3 45.7 100.0 0.0
MN 10 1 704 54.5 45.5 96.1 3.9
MS 6 1* 717 40.0 60.0 0.0 100.0
MO 10 4 4204 46.6 53.4 0.0 100.0
MT 3 1 581 45.1 54.9 4.5 95.5
NE 2 1 728 44.0 56.0 1.1 98.9
NE1 1 1* 389 45.5 54.5 10.8 89.2
NE2 1 1 352 50.0 50.0 49.2 50.8
NE3 1 1* 284 35.9 64.1 0.0 100.0
NV 6 7 4633 52.7 47.3 99.5 0.5
NH 4 6 3809 53.2 46.8 99.7 0.3
NJ 14 2 1146 59.3 40.7 100.0 0.0
NM 5 3 4562 55.1 44.9 100.0 0.0
NY 29 1* 1426 64.6 35.4 100.0 0.0
NC 15 9 5551 50.1 49.9 56.0 44.0
ND 3 1* 348 41.4 58.6 0.9 99.1
OH 18 12 11674 53.3 46.7 100.0 0.0
OK 7 1* 431 33.4 66.6 0.0 100.0
OR 7 1* 499 54.9 45.1 93.8 6.2
PA 20 9 7087 54.9 45.1 100.0 0.0
RI 4 1 451 63.4 36.6 100.0 0.0
SC 9 3* 4199 48.2 51.8 4.9 95.1
SD 3 1* 474 41.8 58.2 0.5 99.5
TN 11 1* 654 46.0 54.0 7.5 92.5
TX 38 1 1140 40.2 59.8 0.0 100.0
UT 6 1* 1149 27.7 72.3 0.0 100.0
VT 3 1* 415 71.3 28.7 100.0 0.0
VA 13 12 11432 52.4 47.6 100.0 0.0
WA 12 2 1059 57.9 42.1 100.0 0.0
WV 5 1* 361 42.1 57.9 1.9 98.1
WI 10 7 6210 54.3 45.7 100.0 0.0
WY 3 0 (0) (100)

* An older poll was used (i.e. no recent polls exist).

Details of the methods are given in the FAQ.

The most recent analysis in this match-up can be found from this page.

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Related

Comments

  1. 1

    rhp6033 spews:

    Wednesday, 10/3/12 at 4:50 pm

    Looking at the map, I can’t find two electoral votes swinging to Romney. Isn’t the smallest number of electoral votes any one state can have equal three?

    Other than that, I don’t see that much good news for Romney. A week or two ago I mentioned that Romney’s electoral college numbers looking so bad, he has nowhere to go but up.

    Wish I could watch the debate tonight. But I’m having to skip my foreign language class to go to a business dinner. Maybe I can catch a little bit on the radio on the way to dinner.

  2. 2

    Darryl spews:

    Wednesday, 10/3/12 at 11:59 pm

    rhp6033,
    The average electoral vote can change by even fractions of a vote between analyses. This is because the average is literally the average of the electoral vote among all simulations.

    The modal values (given in a table of the top ten most probable values) are actual electoral vote counts instead of averages.

    I hope that makes sense.

Recent HA Brilliance…

  • Monday Open Thread Monday, 5/19/25
  • Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza! Friday, 5/16/25
  • Friday! Friday, 5/16/25
  • Wednesday! Wednesday, 5/14/25
  • Drinking Liberally — Seattle Tuesday, 5/13/25
  • Monday Open Thread Monday, 5/12/25
  • Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza! Friday, 5/9/25
  • Friday, Baby! Friday, 5/9/25
  • Wednesday Open Thread Wednesday, 5/7/25
  • Drinking Liberally — Seattle Tuesday, 5/6/25

Tweets from @GoldyHA

I no longer use Twitter because, you know, Elon is a fascist. But I do post occasionally to BlueSky @goldyha.bsky.social

From the Cesspool…

  • Vicious Troll on Monday Open Thread
  • Vicious Troll on Monday Open Thread
  • Kidnapping and Inprisonment under False Authority are Felonies on Monday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Monday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Monday Open Thread
  • Elijah Dominic McDotcom on Monday Open Thread
  • Vicious Troll on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!
  • Elijah Dominic McDotcom on Monday Open Thread
  • Elijah Dominic McDotcom on Monday Open Thread
  • Elijah Dominic McDotcom on Monday Open Thread

Please Donate

Currency:

Amount:

Archives

Can’t Bring Yourself to Type the Word “Ass”?

Eager to share our brilliant political commentary and blunt media criticism, but too genteel to link to horsesass.org? Well, good news, ladies: we also answer to HASeattle.com, because, you know, whatever. You're welcome!

Search HA

Follow Goldy

[iire_social_icons]

HA Commenting Policy

It may be hard to believe from the vile nature of the threads, but yes, we have a commenting policy. Comments containing libel, copyright violations, spam, blatant sock puppetry, and deliberate off-topic trolling are all strictly prohibited, and may be deleted on an entirely arbitrary, sporadic, and selective basis. And repeat offenders may be banned! This is my blog. Life isn’t fair.

© 2004–2025, All rights reserved worldwide. Except for the comment threads. Because fuck those guys. So there.