HorsesAss.Org

  • Home
  • About HA
  • Advertise
  • Archives
  • Donate

Poll Analysis: Clinton–Bush head-to-head state polls

by Darryl — Monday, 8/31/15, 5:03 pm

Clinton
Bush
56.0% probability of winning
44.0% probability of winning
Mean of 273 electoral votes
Mean of 265 electoral votes


Electoral College Map

Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Lousiana Maine Maryland Massachusettes Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia D.C. Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Electoral College Map

Georgia Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Delaware Connecticut Florida Mississippi Alabama Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia D.C. Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Poll analyses are back! Yes…after about four years of rest, I’ve decided to get back into the poll analysis business. If you are unfamiliar with my analyses, take a look at the FAQ. This is a shakedown run with a new HA template, so feel free to mention quirks or problems in the comment thread.

I’ve started with a match-up between Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush. I know, I know, it should be a match-up against Donald Trump instead of Bush. The problem is, there are a total of 20 state head-to-head polls available that match-up Hillary and Donald. For Clinton–Bush match-ups at the state level, there are 212 polls. Apparently, pollsters haven’t quite gotten serious about Trump. I expect that most state head-to-head polls will start including him, however.

For the same reason—lack of state head-to-head polling—I cannot really provide analyses for Sanders, O’Malley, Webb, Biden, Warren, Warner, Cuomo, Schweitzer, or any other Democrat (for now). I will, however, do Republicans other than Jeb Bush, because the polling exists.

After 100,000 simulated elections, Hillary Clinton wins 56,003 times and Bush wins 43,997 times (including the 2,369 ties, which go to the Republican for 2016). Clinton received (on average) 273 to Bush’s 265 electoral votes. In an election held now, Clinton would be expected to win with a 56.0% probability and Bush with a 44.0% probability. That is a close result…damn near a tie.

I remind you that these analyses are driven by state head-to-head polls, not national polls. The state-wide polls are aggregated in a way that emulates the electoral college.

A peek at the long term trend is given after the jump….

The long term trends in this race can be seen from a series of elections simulated every seven days using polls from 31 Aug 2014 to 31 Aug 2015, and including polls from the preceding month (FAQ).

Clearly, until this month, Clinton has maintained a solid lead over Jeb. This is, perhaps, why the media portrays some element of panic among the Democratic establishment (like the largely unfounded rumor that Joe Biden is considering jumping into the race). Is this a reflection of “server-gate”? Or do Democrats spend more of their summer away from phones in national parks and forests? Share your thoughts in the comment thread. (Please remember…the comment threads for these analyses are not “open threads”, so please stay on topic.)

Here is the distribution of electoral votes [FAQ] from the simulations:

An animated sequence of maps and electoral vote distributions over time can be seen here

The most likely outcome of an election held today would be a Clinton victory with 274 electoral votes. Of the ten most probable outcomes, Clinton loses in four of them (269 or fewer electoral votes):

  • 274 electoral votes with a 2.86% probability
  • 273 electoral votes with a 2.38% probability
  • 269 electoral votes with a 2.37% probability
  • 284 electoral votes with a 2.21% probability
  • 266 electoral votes with a 2.16% probability
  • 261 electoral votes with a 2.12% probability
  • 272 electoral votes with a 2.09% probability
  • 285 electoral votes with a 2.06% probability
  • 289 electoral votes with a 2.01% probability
  • 256 electoral votes with a 2.00% probability

After 100,000 simulations:

  • Clinton wins 56.0%, Bush wins 44.0%.
  • Average (SE) EC votes for Clinton: 273.2 (22.1)
  • Average (SE) EC votes for Bush: 264.8 (22.1)
  • Median (95% CI) EC votes for Clinton: 273 (231, 319)
  • Median (95% CI) EC votes for Bush: 265 (219, 307)

Each column of this table shows the electoral vote total aggregated by different criteria for the probability of winning a state (Safe=100%, Strong=90%+, Leans=60%+, Weak=50%+):

Threshold Safe + Strong + Leans + Weak
Safe Clinton 137
Strong Clinton 64 201
Leans Clinton 44 44 245
Weak Clinton 13 13 13 258
Weak Bush 42 42 42 280
Leans Bush 36 36 238
Strong Bush 138 202
Safe Bush 64

This table summarizes results by state. Click on the poll count to see the individual polls included for the state.

1 0 EC # Total % % Clinton Bush
2 8 Votes polls Votes Clinton Bush % wins % wins
AL 9 0 (0) (100)
AK 3 3* 1815 46.2 53.8 0.8 99.2
AZ 11 1* 492 50.0 50.0 49.4 50.6
AR 6 4* 3756 48.2 51.8 6.7 93.3
CA 55 2* 1546 57.2 42.8 100.0 0.0
CO 9 1* 948 46.7 53.3 8.2 91.8
CT 7 1 1062 60.5 39.5 100.0 0.0
DE 3 0* (100) (0)
DC 3 0* (100) (0)
FL 29 1 951 43.6 56.4 0.3 99.7
GA 16 1* 797 49.4 50.6 40.8 59.2
HI 4 0* (100) (0)
ID 4 1* 433 39.7 60.3 0.1 99.9
IL 20 1* 810 55.2 44.8 98.2 1.8
IN 11 0* (0) (100)
IA 6 1 1260 52.4 47.6 88.5 11.5
KS 6 5* 4536 44.8 55.2 0.0 100.0
KY 8 1* 975 45.4 54.6 2.1 97.9
LA 8 2* 1631 47.0 53.0 4.8 95.2
ME 2 1* 838 63.2 36.8 100.0 0.0
ME1 1 0* (100) (0)
ME2 1 0* (100) (0)
MD 10 1* 682 59.8 40.2 100.0 0.0
MA 11 771 60.7 39.3 100.0 0.0
MI 16 2 1571 48.6 51.4 22.3 77.7
MN 10 1 873 51.2 48.8 69.6 30.4
MS 6 2 1077 46.5 53.5 4.9 95.1
MO 10 1 748 46.0 54.0 5.6 94.4
MT 3 1* 868 42.2 57.8 0.1 99.9
NE 2 0* (0) (100)
NE1 1 0* (0) (100)
NE2 1 0* (0) (100)
NE3 1 0* (0) (100)
NV 6 1* 582 57.0 43.0 99.2 0.8
NH 4 715 54.1 45.9 93.8 6.2
NJ 14 1* 1228 61.6 38.4 100.0 0.0
NM 5 1* 626 58.1 41.9 99.8 0.2
NY 29 1* 683 63.3 36.7 100.0 0.0
NC 15 804 50.0 50.0 49.9 50.1
ND 3 0 (0) (100)
OH 18 1 876 51.3 48.7 69.7 30.3
OK 7 0 (0) (100)
OR 7 1* 832 58.7 41.3 100.0 0.0
PA 20 1 901 48.2 51.8 21.8 78.2
RI 4 0 (100) (0)
SC 9 1606 47.3 52.7 6.5 93.5
SD 3 0 (0) (100)
TN 11 0* (0) (100)
TX 38 3* 1415 46.6 53.4 3.6 96.4
UT 6 0* (0) (100)
VT 3 0* (100) (0)
VA 13 1 504 50.6 49.4 57.6 42.4
WA 12 2* 1593 55.6 44.4 99.9 0.1
WV 5 999 42.2 57.8 0.1 99.9
WI 10 1 714 52.8 47.2 86.0 14.0
WY 3 1* 1071 34.8 65.2 0.0 100.0

* An older poll was used (i.e. no recent polls exist).

Details of the methods are given in the FAQ.

The most recent analysis in this match-up can be found from this page.

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Related

Comments

  1. 1

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 8/31/15 at 5:35 pm

    Hillary has been subjected to relentless attacks, but the public hasn’t yet heard a peep about Jeb’s crooked business deals. These numbers probably are the best he’ll get, and it’s all downhill for him from here.

  2. 2

    Sloppy Travis Bickle spews:

    Monday, 8/31/15 at 6:47 pm

    Yay.

  3. 3

    Zotz sez: Thank you Darryl spews:

    Monday, 8/31/15 at 7:09 pm

    Honestly Darryl, isn’t it kind of depressing that we’re/you’re reduced to prognosticating about Hillary and Jeb? I know it’s early, but shit man, that’s so likely and so fucked up on so many levels. But there it is.

    Glad you’re back.

  4. 4

    Darryl spews:

    Monday, 8/31/15 at 7:23 pm

    Sloppy Travis Bickle,

    “Yay.”

    Huh. I didn’t take you for a Hillary fan….

  5. 5

    Darryl spews:

    Monday, 8/31/15 at 7:37 pm

    Zotz,

    “Honestly Darryl, isn’t it kind of depressing that we’re/you’re reduced to prognosticating about Hillary and Jeb?”

    Not really…this match-up doesn’t fall in the category of things that actually depress me. A friend who had been in a car accident died yesterday…that was depressing.

  6. 6

    YLB disagreed and proved it. [Puddyliar was] wrong and YLB was right. spews:

    Monday, 8/31/15 at 7:52 pm

    Can’t wait for the first “unskewed” poll from the trolls.

  7. 7

    Richard Pope spews:

    Wednesday, 9/2/15 at 11:55 am

    If Michigan and Pennsylvania are really in play for the Republicans, there is a decent chance for a GOP victory next fall. Assuming the nominee is halfway electable.

    I hope NEITHER of these individuals is on the ballot in November.

Recent HA Brilliance…

  • Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza! Friday, 5/16/25
  • Friday! Friday, 5/16/25
  • Wednesday! Wednesday, 5/14/25
  • Drinking Liberally — Seattle Tuesday, 5/13/25
  • Monday Open Thread Monday, 5/12/25
  • Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza! Friday, 5/9/25
  • Friday, Baby! Friday, 5/9/25
  • Wednesday Open Thread Wednesday, 5/7/25
  • Drinking Liberally — Seattle Tuesday, 5/6/25
  • Monday Open Thread Monday, 5/5/25

Tweets from @GoldyHA

I no longer use Twitter because, you know, Elon is a fascist. But I do post occasionally to BlueSky @goldyha.bsky.social

From the Cesspool…

  • Elijah Dominic McDotcom on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!
  • Donnie on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday!
  • EvergreenRailfan on Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

Please Donate

Currency:

Amount:

Archives

Can’t Bring Yourself to Type the Word “Ass”?

Eager to share our brilliant political commentary and blunt media criticism, but too genteel to link to horsesass.org? Well, good news, ladies: we also answer to HASeattle.com, because, you know, whatever. You're welcome!

Search HA

Follow Goldy

[iire_social_icons]

HA Commenting Policy

It may be hard to believe from the vile nature of the threads, but yes, we have a commenting policy. Comments containing libel, copyright violations, spam, blatant sock puppetry, and deliberate off-topic trolling are all strictly prohibited, and may be deleted on an entirely arbitrary, sporadic, and selective basis. And repeat offenders may be banned! This is my blog. Life isn’t fair.

© 2004–2025, All rights reserved worldwide. Except for the comment threads. Because fuck those guys. So there.