It’s been about a week and we finally have a handful of state head-to-head polls to look at:
Start | End | Sample | % | % | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
St | Poll | date | date | size | MOE | O | R | Diff |
AZ | Rocky Mountain | 05-Jan | 09-Jan | 553 | 4.3 | 37 | 43 | R+6 |
FL | Tarrance Group | 10-Jan | 12-Jan | 607 | 4.1 | 46 | 45 | O+1 |
NJ | Quinnipiac | 10-Jan | 16-Jan | 1460 | 2.6 | 48 | 38 | O+10 |
OH | Quinnipiac | 09-Jan | 16-Jan | 1610 | 2.4 | 44 | 42 | O+2 |
In New Jersey, Obama’s +10% over Romney isn’t a big surprise.
There are three more interesting swing states. In Arizona, Romney has a +6% lead over Obama. In Florida, Obama was slightly down in the previous poll and now has the slightest +1% lead. And in Ohio, Obama goes from being -1% in the previous poll to a +2% lead over Romney in the most current poll.
The previous analysis showed President Barack Obama leading Romney by 294 to 244 electoral votes, and with a 78.5% probability of winning an election held now.
With these new polls, the Monte Carlo analysis of 100,000 simulated elections gives Obama 77,516 wins to Romney’s 22,484 wins (and he gets the 1,386 ties). Obama receives (on average) 290 to Romney’s 248 electoral votes. Obama has a 77.5% probability of winning and Romney has a 22.5% probability of winning.
Obama | Romney |
77.5% probability of winning | 22.5% probability of winning |
Mean of 290 electoral votes | Mean of 248 electoral votes |
Here is the distribution of electoral votes [FAQ] from the simulations:
Ten most probable electoral vote outcomes for Obama:
- 290 electoral votes with a 1.65% probability
- 279 electoral votes with a 1.63% probability
- 295 electoral votes with a 1.60% probability
- 285 electoral votes with a 1.59% probability
- 288 electoral votes with a 1.57% probability
- 287 electoral votes with a 1.56% probability
- 280 electoral votes with a 1.55% probability
- 299 electoral votes with a 1.54% probability
- 275 electoral votes with a 1.54% probability
- 289 electoral votes with a 1.53% probability
After 100,000 simulations:
- Obama wins 77.5%, Romney wins 22.5%.
- Average (SE) EC votes for Obama: 289.9 (27.6)
- Average (SE) EC votes for Romney: 248.1 (27.6)
- Median (95% CI) EC votes for Obama: 289 (237, 346)
- Median (95% CI) EC votes for Romney: 249 (192, 301)
Each column of this table shows the electoral vote total aggregated by different criteria for the probability of winning a state (Safe=100%, Strong=90%+, Leans=60%+, Weak=50%+):
Threshold | Safe | + Strong | + Leans | + Weak |
---|---|---|---|---|
Safe Obama | 63 | |||
Strong Obama | 127 | 190 | ||
Leans Obama | 89 | 89 | 279 | |
Weak Obama | 16 | 16 | 16 | 295 |
Weak Romney | 0 | 0 | 0 | 243 |
Leans Romney | 95 | 95 | 243 | |
Strong Romney | 84 | 148 | ||
Safe Romney | 64 |
This table summarizes results by state. Click on the poll count to see the individual polls included for the state.
0 | 0 | EC | # | Total | % | % | Obama | Romney | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 8 | Votes | polls | Votes | Obama | Romney | % wins | % wins | |
AL | 9 | 1* | 754 | 37.8 | 62.2 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
AK | 3 | 0* | (0) | (100) | |||||
AZ | 11 | 1 | 443 | 46.3 | 53.7 | 13.6 | 86.4 | ||
AR | 6 | 1* | 1744 | 40.4 | 59.6 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
CA | 55 | 1* | 900 | 55.6 | 44.4 | 99.0 | 1.0 | ||
CO | 9 | 1* | 730 | 51.1 | 48.9 | 65.7 | 34.3 | ||
CT | 7 | 1* | 544 | 51.1 | 48.9 | 64.6 | 35.4 | ||
DE | 3 | 0* | (100) | (0) | |||||
DC | 3 | 0* | (100) | (0) | |||||
FL | 29 | 2 | 1809 | 49.0 | 51.0 | 27.8 | 72.2 | ||
GA | 16 | 1* | 582 | 40.9 | 59.1 | 0.1 | 99.9 | ||
HI | 4 | 1* | 517 | 64.8 | 35.2 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
ID | 4 | 0* | (0) | (100) | |||||
IL | 20 | 1* | 846 | 54.5 | 45.5 | 96.5 | 3.5 | ||
IN | 11 | 0* | (0) | (100) | |||||
IA | 6 | 1* | 1277 | 54.1 | 45.9 | 97.9 | 2.1 | ||
KS | 6 | 1* | 442 | 45.0 | 55.0 | 6.7 | 93.3 | ||
KY | 8 | 1* | 528 | 45.5 | 54.5 | 6.8 | 93.2 | ||
LA | 8 | 1* | 542 | 41.1 | 58.9 | 0.1 | 99.9 | ||
ME | 4 | 1* | 586 | 56.3 | 43.7 | 98.6 | 1.4 | ||
MD | 10 | 0* | (100) | (0) | |||||
MA | 11 | 1* | 905 | 63.3 | 36.7 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
MI | 16 | 1* | 522 | 47.1 | 52.9 | 18.2 | 81.8 | ||
MN | 10 | 1* | 456 | 53.3 | 46.7 | 83.6 | 16.4 | ||
MS | 6 | 1* | 717 | 40.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
MO | 10 | 1* | 435 | 48.3 | 51.7 | 30.9 | 69.1 | ||
MT | 3 | 1* | 1462 | 44.5 | 55.5 | 0.1 | 99.9 | ||
NE | 2 | 1* | 658 | 42.7 | 57.3 | 0.2 | 99.8 | ||
NE1 | 1 | 1* | 269 | 50.6 | 49.4 | 54.1 | 45.9 | ||
NE2 | 1 | 1* | 204 | 45.6 | 54.4 | 18.6 | 81.4 | ||
NE3 | 1 | 1* | 185 | 29.2 | 70.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
NV | 6 | 1* | 513 | 53.4 | 46.6 | 86.0 | 14.0 | ||
NH | 4 | 1* | 993 | 48.3 | 51.7 | 23.9 | 76.1 | ||
NJ | 14 | 1 | 1256 | 55.8 | 44.2 | 99.8 | 0.2 | ||
NM | 5 | 1* | 455 | 58.2 | 41.8 | 99.3 | 0.7 | ||
NY | 29 | 1* | 1006 | 60.2 | 39.8 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
NC | 15 | 1 | 710 | 50.6 | 49.4 | 59.1 | 40.9 | ||
ND | 3 | 1* | 480 | 41.3 | 58.8 | 0.3 | 99.7 | ||
OH | 18 | 1 | 1384 | 51.2 | 48.8 | 73.3 | 26.7 | ||
OK | 7 | 0 | (0) | (100) | |||||
OR | 7 | 1* | 464 | 54.7 | 45.3 | 92.4 | 7.6 | ||
PA | 20 | 1* | 363 | 52.3 | 47.7 | 73.3 | 26.7 | ||
RI | 4 | 1* | 495 | 59.4 | 40.6 | 99.9 | 0.1 | ||
SC | 9 | 1* | 1833 | 51.7 | 48.3 | 85.2 | 14.8 | ||
SD | 3 | 1* | 454 | 37.7 | 62.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
TN | 11 | 1* | 1139 | 47.5 | 52.5 | 11.8 | 88.2 | ||
TX | 38 | 1 | 637 | 46.2 | 53.8 | 8.5 | 91.5 | ||
UT | 6 | 1* | 688 | 33.0 | 67.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
VT | 3 | 1* | 1085 | 61.4 | 38.6 | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||
VA | 13 | 1* | 976 | 48.9 | 51.1 | 30.8 | 69.2 | ||
WA | 12 | 1* | 496 | 54.2 | 45.8 | 90.7 | 9.3 | ||
WV | 5 | 1* | 811 | 38.0 | 62.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | ||
WI | 10 | 1* | 445 | 52.8 | 47.2 | 79.6 | 20.4 | ||
WY | 3 | 0* | (0) | (100) |
* An older poll was used (i.e. no recent polls exist).
Details of the methods are given in the FAQ.
The most recent analysis in this and other match-ups can be found from this page.
Roger Rabbit spews:
Looks like most electoral maps: The Republican gets the southern and Rocky Mountain states that Republicans always get, and the Democrat gets everything else. As of 2012, the GOP is still a regional party whose twin mainstays are southern racism and cowboy freeloaders living off federal subsidies.
Roger Rabbit spews:
These polls are already out of date, because Romney got hammered in last night’s debate, and while Gingrich’s angry denial of his ex-wife’s accusation that he demanded an “open” marriage may play well with GOP-voting white males, he probably has lost a substantial percentage of the female vote.
yd spews:
I finally figured out how to invest for the Obama regime
PAYX paychex (4.5% div) making a killing on the zero interest rates necessary to hide Owebama’s deficit. People having to live now from paycheck or foodstamps to paycheck or foodstamps.
EVEP – Energy Partners LP – up 70% because of Obama’s energy negligence
GLD – Gold – up 100% (see money printing)
SLV – Silver – Up 300% (See Money printing)
Going in today to go all in!
db spews:
But if we flip just SC (9)& NC (15)we get a bare majority. & if you make it SC & OH (18) President Obama loses. It can happen.
Carl spews:
Remember when Al Gore didn’t win Tennessee and every Republican said if you don’t win your home state you should lose anyway? I don’t know if Mitt considers MA or CA his home state now, but either way, not good for him.
Deathfrogg spews:
@ #3
Yawn. Get a new schtick. That old saw doesn’t ring anymore.
MikeBoyScout spews:
Funny:
MikeBoyScout spews:
Republicans, you seem awfully fickle.
Romney’s National Lead Down to 10 Points
Here we are, 24 hours away from Willard locking the nomination up and Republicans are fretting like a syphilitic virgin.
The Massachusetts Moderate who believes in the Cayman Islands is YOUR nominee. For crying out loud, suck it up!
Sean96 spews:
How does Obama loose Michigan according to this map? If it was not for the auto bailout the unemployment rate would be 30%.
Ed spews:
Are you sure you have the Nebraska districts listed correctly? Obama won the 2nd District, which includes Omaha in 2008, not the 1st District, which is Lincoln and a lot of rural area. Hard to imagine Obama is such a favorite in NE-1, not NE-2 that he won previously.
Ed spews:
Are you sure you have the Nebraska districts listed correctly? Obama won the 2nd District, which includes Omaha in 2008, not the 1st District, which is Lincoln and a lot of rural area. Hard to imagine Obama is such a favorite in NE-1, not NE-2 that he won previously.
Ed spews:
Are you sure you have the Nebraska districts listed correctly? Obama won the 2nd District, which includes Omaha in 2008, not the 1st District, which is Lincoln and a lot of rural area. Hard to imagine Obama is such a favorite in NE-1, not NE-2 that he won previously.