HorsesAss.Org

Drinking Liberally

by — ,

The Seattle chapter of Drinking Liberally meets tonight (and every Tuesday), 8PM at the Montlake Ale House, 2307 24th Avenue E.

Buy me a couple drinks and maybe I’ll blab to you about all the new dirt I’m digging up on David Irons.

Comments

  1. And don’t forget to add Goldy, discussing your plans and getting your walking orders from Sims and company too! Be careful what you say tonight. You never know who may be listening!

  2. Roger Rabbit rarely appears in public, and never announces his appearances in advance due to traffic problems caused by the crush of admiring fans, papparazzi, and process servers.

  3. Goldy—
    Haven’t you damaged the Sims Campaign enough???
    Pounding down a couple cordials apparently makes your mouth incapable of stopping!
    If Irons pulls this iron out of the fire, we owe it all to YOU!!!
    Happy drinking!
    I won’t be there….or wiiiiiiilllll I???
    I’m waiting for the Rabbit to tell us the story about that teacher he nailed back in grade school. I doubt it happened…the Rabbit has always been a bit light in the loafers.

  4. That’s right, IDGAF… the Sims campaign sends secret instructions encoded in the foam on my mug of Manny’s Pale Ale. But… as everybody who was there knows… the Montlake Ale House was out of Manny’s last week, and so I couldn’t have gotten my instructions from the campaign.

  5. With or without someone else picking up your tab, Goldy, we all know how you keep your mouth shut. Of course you’ll be blathering on about your little fantasy foray into journalism… I can hardly wait for your next poop scoop! Yawn…

  6. Goldy,

    So you are saying that you were not instructed and did not run the David Irons Story past the Simms campiagn before posting it?

    You are a liar

  7. Goldy, if taking marching orders from Sims means that the public will know about severe and disqualifying personality flaws in a candidate they otherwise might vote for, by all means, keep marching. The public has a right to know.

  8. assholic prr:

    So you are saying that you were not instructed and did not run the David Irons Story past the Simms campiagn before posting it?

    As Goldy has stated several times, he ran the story past the Irons campaign before posting it. They didn’t respond, which could be construed as not denying it.

    I wasn’t aware that either a quarterback-turned-broadcaster or his current QB son was campaigning around here. Which one, and what’s his schtick?

  10. Good grief Goldy! Maybe you should start working for the Enquirer, you are sure walking the line. Of course, I’m sure flinging mud at Irons is more important than any of the other REAL issues involved with the current election. Why would we want to know what either candidate wants to do in regards to Election Reform (we already know that Sims doesn’t think any refrom is needed).

  19. Who the hell are you “recalling”, Josef?

    Must be getting toward time to take your meds again … the effects of the last dose are clearly wearing off.

  24. Clallam County sent out some Absentees with the return envelope addressed to San Juan County>

  25. Looks like Irons has won out the day. Everyone now knows that David Goldstain is nothing more than a…well…Gold Stain on the Horse’s Ass.

  27. Yehaw! Vot fer that Irons guy cuz he’s got balls! Mah mammy, she need a little slappin round like Irons done, specially when she bitch at me for drinkin, which is my consti-tooshunal rite to do whenere I wants to. Yeah! Freedum in a Merika! Liburals is liers like my drinkin buds say.

  28. @5

    Goldy has brought down Michael Brown and David Irons in 1 month — not bad for a guy who doesn’t even claim to be a journalist.

  29. @10

    I think it’s relevant whether a candidate for County Executive beats his mother, has rages, and is a pathological liar.

  31. @20

    You’re right, sometimes voters are morons — just look at the president they elected. That is … IF they elected him, which is doubtful.

  32. @ 11 “Where’s John Carlson when you need him?”

    Same thing I am wondering! I have this backed up septic tank, and I have been waiting for John for 1 1/2 hours.

    Nothing like seeing Carlson suck shit out of a 10 inch pipe using just his powerful lungs and crap encrusted lips!

  34. RUFUS, everyone who did not touch the Kool AID knows that Bush 2004 got 123 votes from scattered wingnuts throughout the US, and 60 Mil + from Diebold based in Ohio.

  35. 34

    I know but did the software in the Diabold machines get changed by secret transmissions from the planet Erf. Have you heard anything new about this latest revelation donkageddon? It makes sense in a donk kind a way.

  37. 35

    Of course it makes sense. Just like your dumbass dia hahaha
    haaha bold voitng machine theory. Iam just speaking on your level. I suppose the next thing you will tell me that there are 60 million plus people in Ohio… ah er never mind you already did.

  39. 1992 — Clinton 43.01% of popular vote, 32 states + DC, 370 electoral votes
    1992 — Bush 37.45% of popular vote, 18 states, 168 electoral votes
    1996 — Clinton 49.24% of popular vote, 31 states + DC, 379 electoral votes
    1996 — Dole 40.71% of popular vote, 19 states, 159 electoral votes

    Looks like a pair of ass-kickings to me.

  40. 39

    Ross baby sucking off the republican votes

    1992 – Clinton(democrats) 43.01% of popular vote, 32 states + DC, 370 electoral votes
    1992 – Bush/Ross(Republicans) Perot 57.00% of popular vote, 18 states, 168 electoral votes
    1996 – Clinton(democrats) 49.24% of popular vote, 31 states + DC, 379 electoral votes
    1996 – Dole/Ross(Republicans) 40.71% of popular vote, 19 states, 159 electoral votes

    I will give Clinton this much.. he was one of our better president no one wanted in the first place.

  43. By the way, Rufus, Perot was not a Republican … a lot of Democrats (including me) voted for him.

  45. Perot not a republican? Perot had all the donks jumping on his corporate bandwagon since we know how all you democrats just love big business running government. The rabbit trying to rewrite the facts. That is like saying Nader get 50% of his votes from Repubs.

  46. Man… Perot! Why can’t they make Republicans like that anymore!

    Balanced Budget! Sane Foriegn Policy! Charts!

    Ah, the old days when they had Republican’s any one could actually vote for and not hang yourself in the morning!

  47. I remember 92 so well. My father and I could vote together. Perot!

    Then in 96 FOX News came and Dad has been senile , and cyanide (Kool Aid drunk) ever since.

    Dman you 50 gallon drum Kool Aid Jamestown!!!!

    Damn you!

  48. You want to have a cure for the “social security” problem.

    Perot would have told everyone of you Trust Fund Republicans to “Eat Shit And Die!”

    That was called “means testing” for you forgetful Neo-Cons.

    Damn I miss Perot.

  50. Maybe after Greenspan retires, he can teach some continuing education courses on fiscal responsibility for Republicans.

  51. I voted for Perot twice myself.
    The little bastard would have won in 1992….but he freaked out and leaked some nutty stuff cuz he was afraid of winning.
    I liked the little man though.
    Smart.
    Could simplify economic issues….even so morons like Donnageddon could understand.
    I believe America is poised for a 3rd Party Candidate in the near future that is basically a Libertarian who wants government out of people’s lives except for Defense and Infrastructure….and lowers taxes to eliminate all the social engineering bullshit and government waste in Defense, Infrastructure and useless programs.

  57. @51

    Yeah Cyn, Perot thought about it, realized he might actually get elected president, and chickened out — as any sane person would do! Only a nut or egomaniac wants that job.

  58. Hey Doofus what facts am I rewriting? Do you disbelieve me when I say I voted for Perot? I don’t give a damn what you think — screw you!

  59. 57
    No Rabbit you might have been one of the thousands of democrats who voted for Perot. Of course the Republicans voted for him the tens of millions. The difference is we got Clinton in the White house in 92 not Bush.

  60. 58

    “tens” of millions? uh … Perot got 19,743,821 votes in 1992 … that’s only ONE ten million, slightly less than two “tens of millions” — dolt. Learn to fucking count.

    Not to put too fine a point of it, but if most of the people who voted for Perot were Republicans as you claim, they GAVE the election to Clinton by voting for the guy with the Alfred E. Neuman ears instead of their own guy. So what’s the beef? You guys wanted Clinton, didn’t you? That’s why you voted for Perot instead of your own fucking candidate, isn’t it? And now you’re bitching about it?!!

    At least I had an excuse for voting for Perot. How could I, Roger Rabbit, not vote for a guy with ears like that? :D

  61. Rog@57–
    I absolutely believe Perot chickened out.
    He had momentum and the lead with a couple weeks to go.
    Too bad…he was a lovable little bastard.
    The elite from both the R’s and D’s saw there little club in serious jeopardy for awhile.

  62. Yeah, Cyn, too bad Perot was a chickenshit. We could’ve used a new party then. Still could — let’s get rid of the GOP — they’re worse than useless!

Can’t Bring Yourself to Type the Word “Ass”?

Eager to share our brilliant political commentary and blunt media criticism, but too genteel to link to horsesass.org? Well, good news, ladies: we also answer to HASeattle.com, because, you know, whatever. You're welcome!

Follow Goldy

I no longer use Twitter or Facebook because Nazis. But until BlueSky is bought and enshittified, you can still follow me at @goldyha.bsky.social

HA Commenting Policy

It may be hard to believe from the vile nature of the threads, but yes, we have a commenting policy. Comments containing libel, copyright violations, spam, blatant sock puppetry, and deliberate off-topic trolling are all strictly prohibited, and may be deleted on an entirely arbitrary, sporadic, and selective basis. And repeat offenders may be banned! This is my blog. Life isn’t fair.