HorsesAss.Org

Search Results for: ’

Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

by — ,

WaPo: The 2016 conversation Paul Ryan wanted to keep private.

The surprising pattern behind color names around the world.

Trevor Noah: So much news, so little time.

The Man-Baby Трамп and his Handlers Sitters:

Kimmel: The week in unnecessary censorship.

The fight to rethink (and reinvent) nuclear energy.

John Oliver: Dialysis.

Straw Men of the Apocalypse: How to deal with your climate change denying uncle.

Mark Fiore: Taxcutiva.

The ТрампRussia investigation gets “Special”:

Ducks aren’t using the “gold plated” ramp yet.

Full Frontal: George W. Bush gives at speech.

Young Turks: Women’s rights are human rights.

Sam Seder and friends: Mike Huckabee is STILL stuck on gay marriage.

Jimmy Kimmel: Schoolhouse Rock – I’m Just a Lie:

Ailes Kicks It:

Bill Maher: I don’t know it for a fact…I just know it’s true.

ONN: Scientists capture audio of beetle colliding with paper clip for first time.

Profiles in swearing: Three recent high-profile examples.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

HA Bible Study: Revelation 9:7-10

by — ,

Revelation 9:7-10
The locusts looked like horses prepared for battle. They had what looked like gold crowns on their heads, and their faces looked like human faces. They had hair like women’s hair and teeth like the teeth of a lion. They wore armor made of iron, and their wings roared like an army of chariots rushing into battle. They had tails that stung like scorpions, and for five months they had the power to torment people.

Discuss.

Syria and the Ghettoside Trap

by — ,

Anne Barnard, the New York Times Beirut bureau chief, writes:

The world seems awash in chaos and uncertainty, perhaps more so than at any point since the end of the Cold War.

Authoritarian-leaning leaders are on the rise, and liberal democracy itself seems under siege. The post-World War II order is fraying as fighting spills across borders and international institutions – built, at least in theory, to act as brakes on wanton slaughter – fail to provide solutions. Populist movements on both sides of the Atlantic are not just riding anti-establishment anger, but stoking fears of a religious “other”, this time Muslims.

These challenges have been crystallized, propelled and intensified by a conflagration once dismissed in the West as peripheral, to be filed, perhaps, under “Muslims killing Muslims”: the war in Syria.

The war in Syria, and what the United States should do about it, is one of those issues where I’m not in strong disagreement with one side or the other so much as I’m bothered by anyone who think there’s an easy answer to it. The conflict has split the country into a multi-sided civil war with various extremist factions, created millions of refugees, and is blazing a path of destabilization through Turkey and up into Europe. Russia, Turkey, Israel, Iran, and the United States have all been involved militarily, each with their own disparate set of proxies and objectives. None of this will be fixed easily, or soon.

I’d wavered a lot on what should’ve been done back from 2011 to 2013 as initially peaceful protests led to a genocidal backlash from the Assad regime. Initially, I thought Obama made the right decision to hold back from a large scale effort to stop the bloodshed. But the years since have given me some pause. As Assad’s position has strengthened, the opposition has become more radicalized and violent in return, and millions of moderate civilians who were hopeful of American intervention, or were even willing to take up arms to protect their communities, have fled. The United States has intervened in small ways, mostly to fight an emboldened ISIS, but has held back from anything that could seriously threaten the regime. And to add insult to injury, we’ve now elected a President who’s trying to keep any of these refugees from re-settling here.

In Libya, we chose to go all-in on restraining Gaddafi, and this intervention led to his removal. And while Libya has it’s problems today, it’s nowhere near the catastrophe that Syria has become. Would Libya look a lot more like Syria if Gaddafi were still there commanding his army to massacre civilians? Would Aleppo still have become an apocalyptic hellscape had Obama intervened and been able to spark Assad’s removal?

Writing in the Atlantic, Shadi Hamid sees our lack of greater involvement in Syria as a profound failure and explains:

The alternative to a proactive and internationalist U.S. policy is to “do no harm,” and this might seem a safe fallback position: Foreign countries and cultures are too complicated to understand, so instead of trying to understand them, let’s at least not make the situation worse. The idea that the U.S. can “do no harm,” however, depends on the fiction that the most powerful nation in the world can ever be truly “neutral” in foreign conflicts, not just when it acts, but also when it doesn’t. Neutrality, or silence, is often complicity, something that was once the moral, urgent claim of the Left. The fiction of neutrality is growing more dangerous, as we enter a period of resurgent authoritarianism, anti-refugee incitement, and routine mass killing.

This logic has always resonated with me and keeps me from being reflexively anti-interventionist. This rationale was central to why I thought it made sense to intervene in Libya, despite all the potential downstream risk. And since then, I’ve seen this difficult balancing act presented in a very different context, but with a oddly similar dynamic – in Jill Leovy’s book Ghettoside.

In Ghettoside, Leovy discusses the history of homicide in the black communities in Los Angeles. That history involved mass migrations of African-Americans from the deep south of Louisiana and Mississippi to communities in the South Central part of Los Angeles. These transplanted communities were used to an environment in the deep south where the justice system would often be massively punitive against relatively minor crimes that affected the larger white majority, but barely responsive to crimes where members of their own community were the victims. In an environment like this, the police were viewed with suspicion and the vacuum created by this mistrust encouraged people to take the law into their own hands. It’s a more nuanced understanding of the roots of black-on-black crime, which Leovy summarizes and defends here:

This is not an easy argument to make in these times. Many critics today complain that the criminal justice system is heavy-handed and unfair to minorities. We hear a great deal about capital punishment, excessively punitive drug laws, supposed misuse of eyewitness evidence, troublingly high levels of black male incarceration, and so forth.

So to assert that black Americans suffer from too little application of the law, not too much, seems at odds with common perception. But the perceived harshness of American criminal justice and its fundamental weakness are in reality two sides of a coin, the former a kind of poor compensation for the latter. Like the schoolyard bully, our criminal justice system harasses people on small pretexts but is exposed as a coward before murder. It hauls masses of black men through its machinery but fails to protect them from bodily injury and death. It is at once oppressive and inadequate.

Leovy’s book is a masterpiece that dives into the lives of LAPD officers who’ve dedicated their careers to upending this perception and providing real justice to members of the “Ghettoside” communities of South LA. The lack of trust they encounter is deeply entrenched and impossible to understand without this historical view. It’s the heart of why attacking the Black Lives Matter movement over black-on-black crime is historically tone-deaf. Black-on-black crime has always been a direct result of institutional neglect when it comes to providing justice in black communities.

In America today, there’s little question about whether our law enforcement institutions have a responsibility to deal with crime in the black community. For many years, it wasn’t always a priority, and in many parts of America, that responsibility is still not being met. But if there’s a vacuum in local enforcement, or even outright malice, we’ll see calls for America’s federal law enforcement agencies to step in and fix it (notwithstanding the potential rollback of the DOJ’s efforts under Sessions). Outside of America’s borders, however, there’s no broad expectation for this, and while this seems perfectly rational, the downstream effects of those who experience the dichotomy in our military priorities are clearly being pushed in a direction of greater mistrust and radicalization.

Going back to Barnard’s NYT piece, she explains what this means in that region with respect to Islamist terror and state-driven violence:

In my decade of covering violence against civilians in the Middle East, mass murder by states has often seemed less gripping to Western audiences than far smaller numbers of theatrically staged killings – horrific as they are – by the Islamic State and its Qaeda predecessors.

It is hard to escape the sense that Western fears of Islamist terrorism have grown so intense that many are willing to tolerate any number of deaths of Arab or Muslim civilians, and any abuses of state power, in the name of fighting it.

The United States’ own “war on terror” played a part in making violations of humanitarian and legal norms routine: detentions at Guantanamo Bay, the torture at Abu Ghraib and the continuing drone and air wars with mounting civilian tolls in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and elsewhere.

Making the argument that we need to be more involved in humanitarian efforts in the Middle East is nearly impossible right now. Intense political pressure against intervening in Syria influenced Obama’s decision to hold back. Both legally and politically, it’s easier to fight groups like ISIS (who openly threaten the west) than to fight a murderous dictator like Assad who’s only killing his own citizenry. But to those in Syria, Assad is the far larger threat. And this will continue to play into the impression Barnard writes about.

Terrorist groups like ISIS have come about for a number of reasons, but what sustains them is a pervasive feeling of powerlessness. Nothing fuels this pervasive feeling of powerlessness more than having to wage an asymmetrical war against an immovable and violent oppressor. It’s hard to really overstate how damaging our invasion of Iraq was in this respect. ISIS was born in that environment, but Assad’s onslaught gave it new life. Fighting ISIS without dealing with Assad is merely treating a symptom of the problem, rather than dealing with the root cause. And if you don’t deal with the root cause (the overbearing feeling of powerlessness that drives young men and women to radicalism), you never win that battle. This is why we’ve spent 16 years in Afghanistan continually driving back the Taliban and watching them come back months later stronger than ever. Once you become the oppressor, and the root cause of the powerlessness that drives the radicalization, you can no longer defeat it directly, you can only exacerbate that dynamic and make it worse.

Coming back to the question of what we should do in Syria, and the uncomfortable conclusion is that we should do more, and many people expect us to do more, but for many reasons, we can’t. We already lost the kind of trust we’d need in that region to really make transformative democratic reforms. And I find it extremely unrealistic that we’d ever be able to intervene in Syria in a way that puts the interests of the Syrians ahead of even the short-term political interests of our leaders. Even if Obama had aggressively implemented a no-fly zone and gave the opposition to the breathing room to overthrow the regime, there’s little doubt ISIS and other extremist groups would’ve celebrated his ouster and played a larger role in whatever came next. Even if this is a better outcome for Syria long term (and I’d argue it would be), it would be bad for us in the short term, and devastating politically.

All of this takes place in the shadow of (and is in no small part being driven by) growing isolationist sentiment in the west. Intervening in other countries’ internal battles has become an even more toxic proposition. It’s just “Muslims killing Muslims” to the American public and not worth the lives of our young men in the military to get in the middle of. It has always felt inevitable to me that when events across the world can readily be seen in real time, we’ll get to a point where we feel compelled and empowered to fix the things we see, but for the time being, we’re actually moving farther away from it. Instead, we’re growing numb and turning away. And despite the huge role America has played in lighting the fires that rage in that region, we now feel forced to step back and watch it burn. We’re simply content – as we’ve long been with Egypt, Saudi Arabia and other places – to allow our proxy strongmen do the dirty work for us, rather than sticking our necks out for the rights of those who don’t make headlines in western newspapers when they’re being slaughtered. It’s this dynamic that leads to that Ghettoside mentality hardening and thereby making it even more difficult to intervene in the future.

I initially started writing this post about 18 months ago, and just gave up. When I dive into an issue, I tend to be an optimist and want to believe that there are paths forward that would work to solve things. Maybe that’s the engineer in me coming out. But with this issue, and with the larger question of how to deal with what Assad has done and continues to do, I don’t have any optimism about anything. It’s easy in this environment to look at America’s tremendous military prowess and believe that it can solve things, but as we’ve seen over and over again, moving this region towards both peace and stability requires more than that. It requires a level of trust and respect on the ground that we currently have no way to achieve. This is especially true now that we have a President who’s woefully unfit for the job and with a rudderless foreign policy apparatus. If there’s any reason to be optimistic about any approach, I don’t see it. And I say that fully knowing that not doing anything has it’s drawbacks. It does, but it’s still very likely the least damaging approach.

Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

by — ,

VOX: Food waste is the worlds dumbest problem.

Stephen talks to a bill.

Jimmy Dore chats with Jeb Bush:


Terminator Трамп and his Troop of Tyrants:

History of the entire world.

Jimmy Dore: Right wing smear of Jimmy Kimmel laughably hateful.

Sam Seder: Alex Jones says stupid shit.

ONN: Here’s why you are wrong.

CongressCritters:

Planet Earth: Predators attack the EPA.

Jimmy Dore chats with Bill-O-The-Fired-Harassing-Clown:

How one tattoo artistdecided to battle hate.

Mental Floss: 30 interesting facts about the oceans.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

From the HA Editorial Board: Mayor Murray, It’s Time to Drop Out

by — ,

Dear Mayor Ed Murray,

Rumors suggest you might have dropped out of the mayoral race as early as earlier this morning. So do newspaper headlines. Also, your live and prepared statements. In the interests of the city and in making us look concerned about the interests of the survivors of sexual assault, we hope the rumors are true.

To be clear, we really were not paying much attention to Twitter this morning. We’re not proclaiming your guilt or innocence in a civil case alleging you sexually assaulted a teenager in the 1980s. Our conclusion that you should not seek re-election comes in reaction to the news that you are not seeking reelection.

From taking up the cause of raising the minimum wage, to bringing developers and affordable housing advocates to the table, to your groundbreaking work on advancing LGBT equality during your tenure in the state legislature, you’ve made a positive mark on this city and this state.

But now that you are not seeking re-election, we ask that you not seek re-election.

Sincerely,

The Editors*

*NOTE: Clearly, nobody edits anything here on HA.

Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

by — ,

David Hawkings’ Whiteboard: What’s a whip?.

George W. Bush does the Not the White House Correspondents’ Dinner

Mental Floss: The history of mowing lawns.

Putin’s Cock Holster:

Trevor: The one who got away.

Samantha Bee roasts the Presidents.

Commandant Comey:

Samantha Bee: FAUX News In Memoriam

PsychoSuperMom: Facts Have A Liberal Bias.

Seth Meyers: Airline deregulation.

“Rep. Jim Martin“:

Samantha Bee: Alt White House Correspondences’ Dinner.

The House GOP Congresscritters Are Literally Trying to Kill People:

Jimmy Dore: Rick Steeves invests in housing homeless.

Samantha Bee: What is facts>?

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

by — ,

Onion: America is more religious than other countries due to its proximity to the Gates Of Hell.

Minute Physics: Can we survive curiosity?

Olbermann: Bill-O-the-Clown’s downfall.

Greenman: What happens in the Arctic doesn’t stay in the Arctic.

Jimmy Fallon: Barack Obama is back from his vacation.

Trevor Noah: Confederate Memorial Day makes waves in the South.

Climate Lab: Going green shouldn’t be this hard.

Turmoil in Трамп-Town:

VOX: FAUX News’ problem is a lot bigger than Bill O’Reilly:

Pot activists arrested after smoking pot on the Capitol Lawn.

Kimmel: The week in unnecessary censorship.

Michael Brooks: FAUX News’ Jesse Watters makes blowjob joke about Ivanka, immediately goes on unplanned ‘vacation’

Minute Physics: How do we know the universe is expanding?

Mental Floss: 31 explosive facts about volcanoes.

Nutcase Alex Jones:

Bill Maher: Change anxiety.

Trevor: So much news…Obama, Coulter & a Senate briefing.

Young Turks: Arkansas is literally on a killing spree.

North Korea’s nuclear threat explained.

Scientists march on Washington.

VOX: How “sanctuary cities” actually work.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

The Fair and Balanced Objective Media Has Absolutely No Impact on the Outcome of Elections… but Please Buy a Subscription Because We’re Crucial to Maintaining a Functional Democracy!

by — ,

One of the original taglines for HA was “an (almost) daily blog on Washington state politics and the press,” and my original intention was to focus mostly on media criticism. I was a child of Watergate who grew up idolizing journalists as defenders of democracy, but my accidental adventure as a subject of media coverage gave me a personal tour into how the sausage was made that left me, well, more than a bit disillusioned.

And thirteen years later, disillusioned I remain:

Republicans and Democrats in Olympia worked hard to produce thoughtful education plans, but both fall short. Trying to spend as little as possible is usually the right thing for them to do. But in this case, it’s likely to prolong the legal fight that’s kept the state in limbo and shortchanged students for decades.

Oh Jesus. First, Republicans and Democrats in Olympia most definitely did not work hard to produce thoughtful education plans. The Republicans were obstructionist as usual, gleefully seeking to use the McCleary crisis to stick it to Seattle homeowners while strategically defunding the rest of state government. There is absolutely nothing thoughtful about their levy-swap smoke and mirrors—it was bullshit when Rob McKenna ran on it, and it is bullshit today. Their only goal is shrinking state government, period, whatever the cost in human misery, because they are a stupid, deceitful, mean-spirited, and profoundly pathological party. (Notice the lack of the word “thoughtful” in that string of adjectives.)

As for the Democrats, I don’t question their motives, but my God could we possibly elect a bigger bunch of fucking cowards? Vote to raise taxes, goddammit—bigly!—and then run on your record of trying to get something the fuck done! You lose elections when you stand for nothing. Try standing for something besides “values” for a change, and you may be pleasantly surprised at the polls.

Second, “trying to spend as little as possible is usually the right thing for them to do”…? Really? Try supporting your goddamn thesis, Brier, instead of laying this steaming turd out there like it’s some undisputed gem of fiscal wisdom! It’s not. It’s a steaming turd. In reality, the big problem in Washington State has long been that we are not spending enough money—on education, on mental health, on our foster care system, on transportation, and on many other crucial public goods and services. And we’re not spending enough money because we’re not raising enough money. Which brings us to the third sentence of this trite piece of editorial fluff:

Um, you know who’s really “shortchanged students for decades,” Brier? Your fucking garbage pit of an editorial board, that’s who!

Yeah, sure, I agree with the main thesis of your column, but you and your fellow editorialists need to take a little personal responsibility. Your publisher and your ed board have aggressively opposed meaningful tax reform for decades, despite being repeatedly confronted with actual math that proved our current funding crisis was inevitable. INEVITABLE, goddammit! Totally unavoidable! We have a structural revenue deficit. It’s baked in to our absurdly antiquated (and cruelly regressive) tax structure. This is what comes from an over-reliance on a sales tax that grows revenue slower than the natural rate of growth of the cost of providing public services at a constant level. There’s no getting around it.

So instead, of vague platitudes and half-hearted half-references to the need for “new taxes,” it’s time for you and your paper to get out in front of this issue and demand that legislators pass an income tax. Because you fucking well know that taxing income is the only option that raises the “ample” funding you claim you want. And while we don’t need you to apologize for the selfishly destructive role your paper has played in creating this crisis, you damn well better acknowledge it if you and your ed board ever want to be taken seriously on budget issues again. (Assuming you ever were.)

Wait. No, actually. Fucking apologize. Because honestly, your paper has been so fucking dishonest on this issue that none of you deserve even an emphysematous whisper of a voice in this debate until you issue an institutional mea culpa for being so goddamn awful for so goddamn long.

And oh, if you think this rant was worded a bit too strong, prove me the fuck wrong.

Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

by — ,

Late Show: A very Canadian 4/20

Young Turks: Scientists march for science

Seattle police practice crowd control techniques in preparation for May Day.

Трамп Trashes America for Another Week:

Retreating glacier leads to disappearance of a river.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s : guide to getting started.

Sam Seder: Sen. Dean Heller’s VERY, VERY BAD town hall.

Buh-Bye Bill:

Why humans are so bad at thinking about climate change.

Bill Maher: New Rule—Make Earth great again:

InfoWar’s Alex Jones Admits He is a Fraud:

Bill Maher breaks down lies about marijuana.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

by — ,

Daily Show: Texas students opt for “cocks, not Glocks”.

Mental Floss: 27 facts about clowns.

Young Turks: Cannabis church opens its doors in Colorado.

Sam Seder: Glenn Beck accidentally argues for universal health care.

Trouble in Трамп Town:

Daily Show: Smart technology.

Late Show: Alter-Egos, Vol. 2.

Tax advice from Daddy Don.

Young Turks: Tomi Lahren goes full-blown snowflake

Farron Cousins: Nut Job G.O.P Congressman who heckled Obama at the SOTU gets roasted at his own townhall.

NASA: Human activity at night.

Sad Bill-O-The-Clown:

Jimmy Kimmel: The week in unnecessary censorship.

Why peregrine falcons are the fastest animals on earth.

Farron Cousins: Federal judge strikes down discriminatory TX voter ID law.

The algorithm that could end partisan Gerrymandering.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

Nailed It

by — ,

A lot of people have taken this ridiculous Seattle Times editorial to task. But now a few days late, let me also make fun of some choice selections.

Meanwhile, Murray is transformed from the bold big-city mayor into one who defers to his defense lawyer when he is invited to speak to The Seattle Times editorial board about the biggest political scandal in Seattle in generations.

I think we can all agree: No matter if you think he did it, if you think a law firm run by bigots is setting him up, or if you’re not sure, the scandal is definitely that he won’t talk to the Seattle Times Ed Board. For decades, we’ll all remember where we were when we read about how Ed Murray isn’t meeting with the Seattle Times to discuss this and is instead deferring to his attorney in a legal matter. For me it was when I got to this paragraph the other day. For many of you, it’s right now.

Murray’s defenders cast the lawsuit and related allegations as well-timed political payback for his iconic career as a gay civil-rights champion. Indeed, there are legitimate questions about the law firm that filed the lawsuit. It is founded by a Tacoma attorney with an anti-gay rights record.

But Murray’s counterpunch begs a question: when is the right time to file a child sexual abuse lawsuit against an elected leader?

This is correct. The Seattle Times shouldn’t sit on the story, just because it’s happening at the beginning of an election year. But also, someone who knows what “begs the question” means* should probably be in the chain. Whatever. You’re here for me to make fun of the baby splitting if you’re here for anything (are you here for anything? Why?).

Murray at times has been that leader, and could still be. Regardless of whether the allegations are true, he cannot lead under this cloud. He should serve out his term and not run for re-election.

There are 2 possible situations. First possibility: He’s guilty of at least one of the charges; If that’s the case, saying he should serve out the rest of his term seems pretty gross. The other possibility is that he’s innocent of all charges; If that’s the case, being forced to not run for office by a bigoted law firm seems like a terrible thing. The Seattle Times’ solution, in other words, is a bad one no matter what you think happened.

[Read more…]

Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

by — ,

How to convince racists to fight climate change.

Stephen: Political monologue

Bill Maher: A few of Republicans’ favorite things.

Late Night: Late night writers tackle sexual harassment

Трамп’s Tower of Tees and Corruption:

Mental Floss: Why did we stop going to the moon?

Bill Maher chats with Jose Antonio Vargas.

Full Frontal: You’re not helping with guns.

Bill Maher: New Rule, “What would a DICK do?”

Sam Seder: Will aide turn on Chris Christie over Bridgegate?

Bassem Youssef: How to hate right.

Supreme Nuke:

Roy Zimmerman: “Turn Off the Hubble” Anthem for the Republican War on Science:

Young Turks: O’Reilly’s show mysteriously ends early

Armchair Presidents: I do leather now.

Sam Seder: Maxine Waters calls FAUX News a “sexual harassment enterprise”.

Samantha Bee: We told you so—Russian hacking.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

by — ,

Conan investigates the mysterious deaths of Russian diplomats.

Jimmy Dore: Anti-Planned Parenthood filmmaker charged with 15 felonies.

Mental Floss: 29 interesting archaeological finds.

Samantha Bee: Government Worked! Rape Kit Backlog Part 2.

Young Turks: Anti-abortion activists charged with felonies

The Трамп Crime Organization:

VOX: How a case gets to the US Supreme Court.

Farron Cousins: Let’s just say it—Republicans hate America

Sean Hannity is bad for America.

Stephen: North Carolina’s ‘bathroom bill’ gets dumped.

Amber’s Minute of Fury: Bill-O-The-Clown

Young Turks: Porn site protects you more than Republicans.

Sam Seder: Dumbass Rep. Ted Yoho Thinks Congresscritters work for the President.

ObamaCare is the Law of the Land:

VOX: Why knights fought snails in medieval art.

Stephen: The scrapping of internet privacy—Something we can all hate together.

Farron Cousins: Pres. Bannon won’t be charged with voter fraud…despite evidence.

Samantha Bee: Someone run against Johnnie Caldwell!!!

Minute Physics: Should you walk or run when it is cold?

Conan: United Airline’s double standard dress code.

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza!

by — ,

Bad typography has ruined more than just the Oscars.

Stephen: A week older.

Трамп’s Pussy-grabbing Plutocracy:

Trevor with So much news, so little time.

What life is like near the border wall.

This is your brain on terrorism.

Трампcare Phaylez:

Bill Maher: Overtime.

Seth Meyers: Mostly political monologue.

Steve Bannon’s Bathtub Musings.

The Garland Gorsuch Confirmation Hearing:

Why the rehabilitation of George W. Bush needs to stop!

China’s Panda diplomacy explained..

Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.

Can’t Bring Yourself to Type the Word “Ass”?

Eager to share our brilliant political commentary and blunt media criticism, but too genteel to link to horsesass.org? Well, good news, ladies: we also answer to HASeattle.com, because, you know, whatever. You're welcome!

Follow Goldy

[iire_social_icons]

HA Commenting Policy

It may be hard to believe from the vile nature of the threads, but yes, we have a commenting policy. Comments containing libel, copyright violations, spam, blatant sock puppetry, and deliberate off-topic trolling are all strictly prohibited, and may be deleted on an entirely arbitrary, sporadic, and selective basis. And repeat offenders may be banned! This is my blog. Life isn’t fair.