Check out the cover that will adorn Monday’s The New Yorker:
[Obama] Spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement: “The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Senator Obama’s right-wing critics have tried to create. But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree.”
Not to be outdone…
McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds quickly e-mailed: “We completely agree with the Obama campaign, it’s tasteless and offensive.”
For crying out-fucking-loud! This is political correctness gone amuck on the part of both campaigns. The caricature is clearly satire, and done in the best tradition of editorial cartooning. It mocks those who are truly tasteless offensive and, frankly, un-American: those right-wing retards who actually spread the “Obama is a radical Muslim who hates our freedoms and his wife is an angry psychopath who hates America” bullshit.
You know, Wingnut retards like the Clark County Republican Party and the Island County Republican Party.
If you want to express outrage (or even take mild offense), go after the assholes who disseminate such lies…not a magazine using satire to belittle them.
Update: The artist who drew the cover (Barry Blitt) responds.
I think it is an accurate family portrait? Michelle is sexy in with the afro, AK 47 and combat boots and Osama Obama has already posed in Muslim dress before. Osama Obama’s BFF Bill Aryers is already photographed stomping on the American Flag.
What’s the problem?
This is the first New Yorker magazine cover that made me proud to be an American. You donks sure can dish out the lies but can’t handle the truth.
Dog…you’re an America hating shitass fuckwad.
Darryl, I know you have some severe mental deficiencies but your link to Barry Blitt’s response is a link to the LA Times article “Who listens to Blogging Heads”
You may want to try again genius.
How ’bout McCain the bigamist, the phony “war hero” in a wheelchair with a viagra drip and his haggy trophy wife pushing him with her bimbo nurse outfit on.
What a hoot THAT would be!
3
Coming form a commie,lefty, liberal like you I take that as a compliment.
I’m a CAPITALIST you ignorant fuck.
RE: 5, McCain Phony War Hero? Is it any wonder that true Americans hate leftist punks? I didn’t think so.
Rob,
Thanks for the heads-up, Squirt! Gosh…you’re smart enough to have at least 3 IQ points on the typical wingnut traitor….
Re: 9, obviously smarter than you. Thanks for your compliment though genius.
7
You sound more like an idiot.
I think a better response from the Obama campaign would have been something along the lines of, “We’re glad to see these ridiculous rumours being treated like jokes, as they should be.”
Re: 12, Rumors? what rumors?
Actually Rush said it best “Satire which is based in truth works”.
RE: 12, Rumors, I haven’t seen any rumors of Michelle Obama with an AK 47, afro and combat boots. I have seen actual pictures of Osama Obama dressed like he is in the magazine cover (thanks Hillary) I have seen Obama supporter Bill Ayers stomping the American flag (along with several Obama supporters here locally). I haven’t seen a picture of Osama Obama hanging over the fireplace but I haven’t been in the Osama Obama home.
Dog…you haven’t the least fucking clue what you’re talking about do you?
Re: 16, I am a former marine and we have our problems with Navy, but you punk aren’t qualified to lick the sweat from John McCains balls.
Oh BLAH BLAH DEE FUKKIN’BLAH!!!
I’m a former war protester…ROB…and currrent war protester for that matter and worked my ass off to expose the fiasco in Southeast Asia for what it was…which the Chickenshit-In-Chief managed to worm his way out of by the way. Where’s your outrage over Bush and his national Guard/AWOL shenanigans, dumbass!!!
Where’s your OUTRAGE over the smearing of John Kerry…a LEGITIMATE war hero. McSame got shot down. OK…respect for that. But he has yet to support veterans in any meaningful way, and can’t even manage his own fucking campaign. He’s unfit for this office.
You really ARE a hypocritical pig. Lick you’re own nuts.
Hah! I like that illustrator. A good artist can paint the right wing lunatics in their true light.
That shit-eating mutt and robtard chime right in on cue.
So do you liberals really accept people like the pussy rujax in you midst just to win an election? Of course then there is Darryl who has to have a right winger come over and fix his stupid post because “liberals always need someone to do for them”.
John McCain is a hero, Even Osama Obama admits that, On the other hand Osama Obama is not a hero, he has never done anything in his life to make America a better place.
Obama is compared by allot of you dumb fucks to John F. Kennedy, John F. Kenney was also a war hero, he risked his life like John McCain to save his crew. He also served in the House and the senate for 8 years.
Borack Obama is not a war hero, he is even to afraid to debate one. He has served in the senate for 143 days and you believe he would make a good president.
Based on what?
re 2: I don’t hate America.
I hate Republicans and everything they stand for.
It’s not the same thing.
RE. 20, I like it to Yos Libtard, It is being emailed accross the country.
re 17: You are a liar. What is your Marine number? You don’t have to tell me WHAT it is, just what it is.
I’m thinking you won’t know.
Re: 19, While you were being a coward and protesting the War in Vietnam so you wouldn’t get you cowardly ass put in danger I was serving there. Thanks for the help you worthless coward!
Re: 24, 4th Cag, 4-3-6 Quang tri, where were you asswhipe?
You have no idea why you were there do you? Ask SHELL OIL.
That’s right dumbshit…ANOTHER war for oil.
Just a garden variety right-wing puke, aren’t ya ROB? So stupid…ROB…you believe anything Fox and Limbaugh tell you. You’re their boy all right ROB. They like ’em like you, man…big and stupid.
Wow, this thread is going good.
Darryl,
people give a crap about what the New Yorker prints?
I did not know this.
RE 27, uhmm rujax, I was there because i love my country, my father and grandfather served this great country. I followed their footsteps to kill as many communists like you that I could.
Rujax, there is no oil in Vietnam, we had to bring our own. That must have been an LSD hallucination you had while hiding under your mothers skirt.
RE. 24, what a pussy!
rejerk @19 your a fuckin idiot tell me asshole how many people you know who have 3 purple hearts like john kerry and never spent a day in the hospital.go ahead fuck ward ive got all year.the only person i saw with more ph was a lance corporal who was a gate guard at nas alamedia ca.
Like I said…ROB…another REALLY stupid, ignorant right-wing fucking tool. All they have to do is wave a flag and point and you shoot. Just like Kent State. Just like Mi Lai…huh, ROB. Long as they tell you what a good boy you are…huh, ROB. And give you some shiny pot metal…huh, ROB. So was Bush a “war hero” too, ROB? You remember what the NATIONAL GUARD was for back then…don’t you ROB? Can’t have things too COMPLICATED now…ROB. Don’t want a good ‘ol boy like you getting CONFUSED.
http://www.amazon.ca/Fuelling-.....1860644570
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_.....m_over_oil
You don’t even know what a fucking “communist” is…do you, ROB.
Take Their Oil & Send ‘Em Cigarets
… And while you’re at it, log every last tree off the hillsides and to hell with the mudslides!
That’s what you’re voting for if you vote Republican. If you think like a 19th century robber baron and a 1914 – 1918 Hun, rolled into one, it’s easy to vote Republican.
But for anyone with an ounce of common sense, it’s impossible.
(pu…another brain surgeon….)
Oooo oooo pu…that HURTS. Wow! You REALLY got me there, man. Boy Howdy!!!! You are just too sharp for me, man.
Whew!
Hey Rabbit! How ya doin’?
Remember THIS dumbshits?
http://www.angelfire.com/co/CO.....etnam.html
Newsweek Earns An ‘F’ In Ethics
The New Yorker isn’t the only publication to step on its dick this week. Read this crap from Newsweek:
“Dark deeds have been conducted in the name of the United States government in recent years: the gruesome, late-night circus at Abu Ghraib, the beating to death of captives in Afghanistan, and the officially sanctioned waterboarding and brutalization of high-value Qaeda prisoners. Now demands are growing for senior administration officials to be held accountable and punished. Congressional liberals, human-rights groups and other activists are urging a criminal investigation into high-level ‘war crimes,’ including the Bush administration’s approval of interrogation methods considered by many to be torture.
“It’s a bad idea. In fact, President George W. Bush ought to pardon any official from cabinet secretary on down who might plausibly face prosecution for interrogation methods approved by administration lawyers. (It would be unseemly for Bush to pardon Vice President Dick Cheney or himself, but the next president wouldn’t allow them to be prosecuted anyway—galling as that may be to critics.) The reason for pardons is simple: what this country needs most is a full and true accounting of what took place. …
“Pardons would further a truth commission’s most important goals: to uncover all important facts, identify innocent victims to be compensated, foster a serious conversation about what U.S. interrogation rules should be, recommend legal reforms, pave the way for appropriate apologies and restore America’s good name.”
(Quoted under fair use.)
Roger Rabbit Commentary: Give me a fucking break. What Newsweek proposes is the moral equivalent of letting Gary Ridgway go free in exchange for telling us where the bodies are. I can’t remember, in my lifetime, such an appalling moral failure by a major publication.
Personally I am on Darryl’s side here … though I do think (and expect) something equally satiric to emrge for McC.
My fave would be an image of littlee John n sailor suit playing voom voom with an aircraft carrier and toy planes.
BTW, I do think BHO lookas a bit like curious George but then so does the real Geporge look like a monkey!
Re: 33, look pussy, I wasn’t in the national guard, Mi Lai was an isolated incident in a 10,000 day war, and you are a coward.
As for what a communist is? This is my take on it. A communist is someone who takes over a village, rapes the elders wife and children in front of him and thin disenbowels him.
I love killing communists!
90% of AMERICA doesn’t get this kind of satire/irony. They just don’t.
I think it’s funny, but the New Yorker should know better about what most people will see, does know better. I feel it is consciously or unconsciously intended to be a political attack on the Obamas.
@38
Oh? So you don’t consider a major news organization trying to improperly influence a presidential election, a moral failure? And, arguabley, one of far greater import, than any putative “war crimes”?
WOW…
Damn ROB…you are almost as smart as our resident PhD Ol’ pu.
Shit. Fucking beyond stupid, man.
Whatever.
Go do your thing. Just don’t hurt yourself.
Well now we know why Bush got elected twice. I hope the rest of the electorate isn’t as dumb this time.
I really feel sorry for those guys (rob, pu, i-burn). Just HOW do you go through life that ignorant.
I don’t get it.
@44
So am I correct in assuming that if Obama wins, it’ll be the “will of the people”, but if McCain wins it’ll be because of the stupidity of the American voter?
Uhhhh..sorry rob…
@45
“Just HOW do you go through life that ignorant.”
How do you?
Re: 43, you are a pussy war protestor, You only protested in my war because you were afraid of serving you country and you hid under you whore mothers skirts. There are very few in the US that believes you did the right thing. Most people think you were a dirty stinking hippy coward. We still believe that today.
Like I said, dipstick…
…don’t hurt yourself.
OK genius…just WHAT makes me ignorant?
I know more about what “your side” thinks and does than you know about what “my side” thinks and does. I concluded that you are wrong after considering your position.
How is THAT ignorance?
@52
Oh, please do tell. Just what is it that I believe?
What makes you ignorant is your assumed intellectual superiority to anyone you perceive as “right-wing”. That is evident in every one of your posts. You’re so much smarter that you know what’s “really” going on in the world. Unlike the rest of us poor, deluded saps.
Finally!
You got the idea! You’re not as stupid as I thought!
Just WRONG.
Re; 51, you are a pussy and a coward that never served this country. That is what makes you wrong and you can’t change that. Just and when I served and could have been killed and couldn’t change that. You will go through you life being a pussy coward. I won’t.
http://www.merriam-webster.com...../ignorance
Good night, clown prince of i-burn.
Like I said rob…
…don’t hurt yourself.
Get some sleeep. You need it.
@39
Mostly, I just don’t care. I read the New Yorker a few times 10-15 years ago and couldn’t figure out why they could stay in business.
This is for you Rujax
“This Is My Rifle”
THIS IS MY RIFLE. There are many like it, but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I master my life.
My rifle, without me is useless. Without my rifle, I am useless. I must fire my rifle true. I must shoot straighter than my enemy who is trying to kill me. I must shoot him before he shoots me. I will….
My rifle and myself know that what counts in this war is not the rounds we fire, the noise of our burst, nor the smoke we make. We know that it is the hits that count.
We will hit…
My rifle is human, even as I, because it is my life. Thus I will learn it as a brother. I will learn its weakness, its strength, its parts, its accessories, its sights, and its barrel. I will ever guard it against the ravages of weather and damage. I will keep my rifle clean and ready, even as I am clean and ready. We will become part of each other. We will…
Before God I swear this creed. My rifle and myself are the defenders of my country. We are the masters of our enemy. We are the saviors of my life.
So be it, until there is no enemy, but Peace!
THE CREED OF THE U.S.M.C.
Good night Bitch!
I feel for you rob. Get some sleep buddy. You’ll be better in the morning.
Darryl, this dual party denunciation is political correctness run amok. You can only thank those in yo Donkey party who claim anything and everything which could be humorous taboo.
Obama in a dirty nightshirt on the cover of the New Yorker?…with that psycho,bitter,nitwit of a wife of his in cammies…probably not that far off from reality ,really.
Now if we could only get the New Yorker to parody the McCain version of family values.
1023 year old JohnBoy comes home from Viet Nam after working with the NVA, finds his horribly disfigured wife at home. Tells her to fuck off. Has an affair with Sin Dee – finally divorces his wife cause she’s too ugly, and then fucks his way to fortune with Sin Dee.
Now THAT is a funny (but unfortunately true) story.
@ 64 ~ you need to keep your fantasies to yourself little boy.
Maybe you should seek some counseling in order to get to the crux of why you have so much pent-up hate.
Godspeed on your recovery.
Puddystupid: its your peeps like doofus, robtard and little rickie dumbass who are jerking themselves off silly over that magazine cover.
Poor Yearns4 Little Boys ~ So many stalls to peer into and so little time right? you twisted, little pervert. Just remember you have to register when you move son, that way the police can keep an eye on you for a change.
I might have to go out and purchase this New Yorker magazine and just leave it lying around the office just to see the liberals squirm uncomfortably.
Too damn funny to see the Moonbat lefties hyperventilating over this cover with Barry and his nutty spouse on it. I love it.
Obvious satire of course, but interesting to note that what remains of the “right wing” is so completely dim and gullible that they believe it.
Puddylicker (posting as Rick D) I LOVE it when I get under your skin. Baby rapers like you need to be bothered as much as possible.
@58…M…
The New Yorker is a magazine for literate people. No wonder its appeal escapes you.
Political POV aside, it has some of the best pure writing of any publication on the newstands today. Not to mention its cartoons, which are liberally (see…the word occasionally works) scattered throughout its pages, are legendary.
That the Obama campaign is thin skinned about the cover betrays, perhaps, a weaker than expected confidence in its candidate?
Could be…
That the McCain campaign joined in criticizing the cover? Sort of a variation on the theme of “damned with faint praise.”
In the meanwhile – to give Darryl his due – the satiric nature of the cover speaks for itself. And until you’ve read the several thousand word think piece that goes along with it, how can you really discern the intent of the cover?
Heck…were I Barak Obama, I’d jolly well get in touch with the cover artist, ask for a signed original, have it framed, and hang it prominently in my office. Nothing better to diffuse any suspicion than to embrace the thing in order to be in on the joke.
In the meantime, he might want to consider thickening his skin. Anyone who wants to be President better get used to stuff like this…and worse.
After all, the HA Happy Hooligans will eventually turn on him, and we all know the level of vitriol they can disgorge. Talk about your Bay of Pigs!
The Piper
I think the cover is in bad taste, but that any furor over it is more consideration than it really deserves. To my mind, the most important point is that anyone who would take such an image seriously does not read The New Yorker.
More Liberal projection. Since the rational people (conservatives) aren’t trashing Obama (like Hillary did for example), Liberals do themselves then blame it on conservatives. You’re fucktards are the single most ignorant group on earth.
@72 Liberal projection? Coming from an America-hating, projection spewing, commie-fascist troll, I’d say that’s hilarious.
swassociates @ 72,
“More Liberal projection. Since the rational people (conservatives) aren’t trashing Obama (like Hillary did for example)….”
Right on!
Because, clearly, Hillary controls the web site of the Clark County Republican Party.
And, and, and…obviously, Hillary was holding the gun to the head of Cathy Colley (chairwoman of the Grays Harbor Republican Party) screaming, “Send it…or I’ll shoot!”
Lookie here, it’s the Eye on Porn HAs clueless idiot@66.
And you aren’t along with RudeASS, bybygoober, etc. looking for the New Yorker to do a McCain caricature?
JABOOM – Just a bunch of obtuse morons!
Steve, you have it wrong. Liberals are commie-loving fascists.
Early Progressivism in the 1900s. Did lefties think Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin were great people back then? YES they did.
Don’t libtards like Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez now?
Didn’t libtards like Daniel Ortega in the 80s?
Keep up the good work Steve. You are still HAs Biggest ASS!
Hey Eye on Porn HAs clueless idiot@66: Wasn’t it your ilk on Goldy’s NorthWest Division of Lunatic Moonbat!s who got all bent out of shape when Rush Limbaugh made his Obama The Magic Negro parody until you realized a libtard black LA Times Columnist David Ohrenstein made the first reference to Obama? YES it was you and your ilk.
So I ask HAs clueless idiot, is the New Yorker a publication controlled by the Murdoch Empire? Or by Richard Mellon Scaife? If so I expect the standard moronic commentary soo enough. If not then STFU as you have no argument.
Ohhh that’s right your next comments will be “I don’t take orders from you“
RudeASS, “One of the principal architects of the Vietnam War, former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara”
As I remember he was Donkey. Imperialism at it’s best from the Donkey? YES it was.
Hey Pelletizer@38: Wasn’t you one of the libtards here on The ASS who touted the Newsweek Obama leads by 15 points? Newsweek is in the Donkey tank so how can they get an “F”? You jackboot goosestep march with them down the burrow Pelletizer!
I’m glad to know that you think I’m an ass, Puddy. It’d be disturbing if an America-hating, commie-fascist traitor such as yourself or your lunatic fringe brethren-in-hate ever warmed up to me.
You fascist freaks hate America, you hate Seattle, you hate Mom and apple pie and everything else that is decent in this world. Is it any wonder that America rejects your politics of hate?
RudeAss@51: We see the evidence of your side every day.
ELF – UW and Street of Dreams
PETA – Throwing paint on people who wear furs
NAMBLA – Well we have a resident poster here too.
GLA and GLAAD – Will shove it up their opponents hershey highway if you disagree with them.
Donkey Crongress – Fairness Doctrine cuz Scare Amerikkka has miserably failed. Is Randi 4 Gunshots Rhodes your sister?
Steve@86:
1.) Reread #76
2.) Repeat #1!
I see that the BIAW ditched their hate-filled newsletter. So much hate from the fascist right. What’s up with that? What is it about America that inspires them to hate our country so much? Puddy’s an America-hater. Maybe he can clue us in.
Besides Steve, we love America you hate Amerikkka. We know who you are. Just ask your Obama hating Donkey friends in WVA, PA, Ohio and Kentucky
Steve: I didn’t get the BIAW newsletter. Since you know it’s contents I guess this speaks well for you…
Rob, when you call RudeASS a bitch you are complementing him.
Political cartoons are just that: cartoons! Anyone who takes the damn things seriously needs a vacation, if they can afford the gas to go anywhere!
I like to count how many times the BIAW uses the word “hate” in their newsletter. Regarding their hate-letter, first they toned it down, then they got rid of it. They probably understand that leaving a trail of hate spewed towards our state and country won’t help their lackey, Dino Rossi, in the fall.
Hey genius, bush isn’t running for a third term. Remember, the nation overwhelmingly voted for bush over the man you call a war hero. A man that lied about his service. Wanna talk about that memory seared, seared into his brain on christmas eve under nixon. What;s worse is the lie was so easily proved to be a lie, the swiftboaters exposed kerry for being a liar.
If serving in the military is so important, mccain over obama. Obama NEVER volunteered to serve in the military.
Toad away
Towed away
Toed away
Toowed away, ooh
Where do you go when your Tood away
And lo there came onto them Phillip, called Punter.
And he was Lillian Wroth in his extremity.
Merrily merrily he said unto them saying
Merrily merrily, for I am come
And he came unto the house of his mother’s brother’s servants saying “Where am I?”
And there was no one there to answer him. Not even no one saying,”Nowhere yea but in the land of reversable cups, and sanitary pedistuls!”
And he lay in that land, a lone time, like worms out of a hot cheese log.
Ed @ 90,
I remember Firesign Theater: “I think we’re all bozos on this bus!”
Psych 101, Rujax is just projecting his hate for himself onto other.
Rujax avoided the vietnam war like a coward. He saw bush flying aircraft rujax was too scared to. So rujax has to call bush a coward to make up for his own lack of patriotism.
67 – Little Rickie Dumbass you make me laugh with your dirty-minded bullshit.
Do whatever the fuck you please. We all know that cover is making fun of right wing jerk-offs like you.
Projection, Psych 101. So anyway, too bad you hate america, hate seattle, mom and apple pie, Steve. That’s probably a real downer for you.
Don’t you just hate it when someone projects and reveals the truth about their feelings for the country.
LMAO @ Stupes @ 77.
That magazine cover is making fun of that e-mail bullshit you wingnuts pass to one another!
It’s got your freaking mentality down.
YOU Wingnuts are such fucking losers!
HAs clueless idiot: It was you who brought us porn on HA. So when called on it you deflect and ignore.
However Yearns4 Little Boys is funny.
That’s ok, you are sick and mentally unstable.
The magic negro flap was about WHITE right wingers (Limpblows and that Shanklin guy) putting down a black journalist and black leaders.
You’re such a tool Stupes.
All one has to do is read the comments at daily kos about the cover.
It appears that democrats don’t have a sense of humor. Some are wishing death for the artist. Once again, liberal tolerance for those that don’t agree.
Read the hate and rejoice. With obama dropping in the polls and so many democrats losing faith in him it is just a matter of time until the liberals turn on obama like they did to hillary.
96 – Of course you think it’s funny. I wonder what little Rickie Dumbass thinks of your choice for Prez.
I brought porn?
Here it is again, Faux Noise Porn
http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/18865-fox-news-porn
your favorite kind. My gift to you.
HAs clueless idiot@97 again you are ignant of political history. Hint: Google LObama Magic Negro David Ehrenstein LA Times Around March 2007.
An educated liberal is an educated liberal. Don’t let facts explode your single celled mind FOOL!
@94 I can understand why you would be too ashamed to admit that you’re a fascist and how you’d project that onto others. That fascist shit doesn’t go over too well here in America.
re 26: I knew you were full of crap. Your official Marine number is your social security number.
Asswipe.
Where were you when they passed out brains? It’s too easy with you blustering twerps.
Ducks in a row.
re 87: What did Boss Tweed think of Thomas Nast?
Didn’t libtards like Daniel Ortega in the 80s?
LMAO @ Stupes again! Who’s the prez of Nicaragua right now?
Wasn’t he “democratically” elected? Stupes, that chimp you voted for twice has done jack shit about it.
That democracy stuff spewed by those neo-cons you love is total bullshit.
If you don’t like Fox News, don’t watch them.
HAs clueless idiot @95
Michelle Obama was not proud of her country until 2008. Even though she went to some of the best schools in the nation way before 2008. I bet if she was born somewhere else, she’d be yearning to be an American.
101 No, no Stupes. That racist song was about white guys putting down black people.
Deflect all you want Stupes. You’re still a tool.
HAs clueless idiot: You again are ignant of history. Do I need to deliver another Google based PuddyFact On Daniel Ortega and the 80s?
Frame of reference idiot.
You can’t be this ignant all the time?
Well maybe you are.
HAs clueless idiot, still stupid and born that way. From the article since you can’t seem to want to read truth: “But it’s clear that Obama also is running for an equally important unelected office, in the province of the popular imagination — the “Magic Negro.”
The Magic Negro is a figure of postmodern folk culture, coined by snarky 20th century sociologists, to explain a cultural figure who emerged in the wake of Brown vs. Board of Education. “He has no past, he simply appears one day to help the white protagonist,” reads the description on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_Negro .”
107 – I’m pleased to know you’re on your way back home.
Michelle not only failed to bite her tongue about her feelings over her country, she committed the gravest sin of all (to you that is):
She appeared on “The View”.
If Barack can’t control his own wife how can he fight the terraists?
Now McSameOld – there’s a guy who knows how to keep his rich old lady in line!
LMAO!!!
Noriega? Back in the 80’s Reagan’s Rummy was giving Saddam a blow job. How’d that work out?
Did Steve just fart? Who’s talking about Noriega?
Oh yes, he’s just a simple single celled moron!
HAs clueless idiot@111: What are you babbling about?
I brought up her words. I could care less about what show she appears on.
HAS clueless idiot, did you read the LA times piece yet?
No? Well I can understand, exploding mind syndrome as explained on the Huffington Post blog.
@113 How quickly you you retreat into denial! No surpise. You America-hating commie-fascist traitors are good at that.
Looks like there are more bybygoobers in the Donkey party than originally thought.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....12295.html
LA Times? The LA Times is full of shit. So is The Nation for a left wing counter.
Steve, I realize following a blog thought train is a difficult experience for you.
Where does Noriega fit in? Was he a communist? Or a dictator like Nancy Stretched Face Pelosi strives to be?
Ahhhhhh yes Michael, the LA Times is a liberal bastion of thought. So when they gave Barack that title, it was a free for all after.
HAs clueless idiot has problems grasping facts. I think the only thing he can grasp is the money his wife makes in the lefty leaning SEIU!
Puddy,
“Michelle Obama was not proud of her country until 2008.”
Bull-fucking-shit, Pud. Come on, man, you aren’t that stupid and shallow.
If you take the stoopid interpretation of Ms. Obama’s statement, then what do you make of McCain’s “I really didn’t love America until I was deprived of her company”?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkPUBn3vyoM
@121 Actually, I believe he is that stupid and shallow. He’s also quite insipid. America-hating fascists are like that, you know.
Darryl: I become Shallow Hal hanging around the likes of HAs clueless idiot, HAs biggest moron bybygoober, and HAs Biggest ASSHole Steve.
regarding Michelle Obama – she said:
“For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is making a comeback.”, she told a Milwaukee crowd today on 2-18-2008.
Now for the facts:
Didn’t Toni Morrison tell all of us we elected the first black president in 1992? Just checking…
I guess she’s not proud it was a Republican who nominated the first black to be Secretary of State?
I guess she’s not proud a black woman was national Security Advisor? And this black woman is a certified pianist and Russian Scholar?
I guess she’s upset the Berlin Wall came down in 1989 because Reagan prodded Gorbachev in Reykjavik?
I suppose she wants the Cold War to continue?
I guess she loved Nicolae Ceausescu?
I guess she’s upset that the most popular TV show in the 80s was Cosby which had an all-black cast? Oh wait He’s a doctor and she was a lawyer. A black woman lawyer. Oh shucks she couldn’t play the part. Never saw them practicing on the show. Maybe that upset Michelle.
I guess she’s upset that Oprah became a TV icon and is worth $1MMM dollars or more? Maybe cuz Oprah didn’t become a mutha is upsetting Michelle?
I guess going to Harvard Law as a black woman was a disgusting act?
Maybe she didn’t love the country the way jesse jackson was holding it by the nuts. Since he wanted to cut off her husband’s nuts is she not proud again?
Of course Puddy hates America. That’s what commie-fascists do. When has he ever said anything good about our country? No, all he does is spew hate.
@123 I call you the shallow and insipid America-hating, commie-fascist traitor that you are and that makes me an asshole? Whatever.
Fool AKA Steve: I love America. Stop projecting your hate.
@126 Spewing hatred for America and Americans is not showing much in the way of love, Puddy. You hate America, plain and simple. I fail to see why you won’t admit it.
Puddybud @ 123,
So…by your logic….that makes McCain a traitor because, clearly, he hated America for some 30 years….
@128 Puddy’s hatred of America forces him into all kinds of strange rationalizations.
Darryl: Let me make this perfectly clear since you seem to forget.
I don’t like McCain. I know you are a smart man so, please don’t equate me with him.
So…by your logic….that makes McCain a traitor because, clearly, he hated America for some 30 years….
Longer than that. McCain recently claimed it’s tough to be proud of the United States. This is a man whose own statements indicate that he still hates his country. His claim (made multiple times) that the country’s economic problems are all in our heads is further evidence of his disrespect for his country and its citizens.
Steve@everywhere: At least I have rationalization on my side.
What do you have except this strange silliness and like for fascism?
For someone who’s had it pretty easy in life, Michelle Obummer is one tall glass of sour milk. I don’t care if she has a chip on her shoulder or not, I’m not voting for “curious george” in November regardless. We don’t need his style of Marxism to spread like a cancer on the American body politic. Now, back to regular scheduled Liberal squealing about the New Yorker Mag.
Puddybud,
“I don’t like McCain. I know you are a smart man so, please don’t equate me with him.”
Equate?? Nothing in my comments suggests that you are McCain (or even support him).
I’m just wondering if McCain’s statement, “I really didn’t love America until I was deprived of her company” makes him a traitor in your eyes.
Poor Stupes – he’s made his bed with the little Rickie Dumbasses of the world who call Obama a monkey.
Poor Stupes – just has a real problem with women. Michelle hasn’t shown any of the ambition Hillary has and he’s all over one statement that expresses a sentiment shared by many black people in this country – now matter how good they’ve had it.
Darryl, by PuddySilly’s “logic” he can’t vote for Rossi this November.
Catholic Church – pedophilia – Rossi.
“The inference is there.”
It’s the old wingnut guilt by association brain-damage they’ve playing this election season. How does it feel wingnuts?
HAs clueless idiot:
Where did I agree or call Barack a monkey except in your silly stupid mind?
And I have problem with women? You are really daft. You have problems with strong women.
Condi Rice for example. Strong and a leader. Did you know she’s black?
What is my logic HAs clueless idiot? I can easily vote for Dino. He didn’t do pedohilia. What a stupid thing to for you to say in public. He’s not like bybygoober or Yearns4 Little Boys.
Regarding Heilary, she brought all the non-congruent Barack comments. Many of the Heilary 16%er supporters here ate it up!
@132 Silly troll. Trolls are fascist enablers by virtue of their transmitting the extreme-right-wing talking points. Not that you’re really a true fascist yourself, mind you, but it’s enough that you do what you do. Mindless cheerleader or not, you’re a part of it. You’re in the game and you’re on the wrong side.
I am not of the left. I’m sure my thoughts of spending money on golf courses instead of the homeless doesn’t jive with them. High Point Housing project would make a great golf course. We could still put one in Discovery Park. HOV lanes suck. Development is not evil in itself any more than any other value is. A strong economy does more for the poor than any social program. No, I’m not of the left. But I’ll ally with them against evil pricks like you any day of the week.
The image of the Republican party is now one of a failed war, a failed economy, a debt to last generations, theo-crazy gubmint, moral decadance, stripped resourses, America’s decline, as well as being the party of disgusting America-hating internet commie-fascist trolls. Way to go. I’m sure Lincoln, Roosevelt, Goldwater and Reagan would be proud.
America can come back. The ass-whupping you’ll receive in November will be another step in the right direction.
@139
If you aren’t a left-winger, you’ve certainly adopted their methods: groundless and incendiary accusations, ad hominem attack, innuendo and misdirection, etc. Unique to the left? Hardly. Carried to the extreme by them? I’d say so. As someone once said, “Conservatives think Liberals are wrong, Liberals think Conservatives are evil”. Five minutes perusing nearly any thread on HA proves the truth of that little homily. Your responses do as well.
Puddy,
“Where did I agree or call Barack a monkey except in your silly stupid mind?”
Ummmm…Puddy, where did anyone claim you called Obama a monkey?
So Puddy, I’m still wondering if McCain’s statement, “I really didn’t love America until I was deprived of her company” makes him a traitor in your eyes.
Here’s the link again: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkPUBn3vyoM
Let us put a positive spin on the NEW YORKER. It is good to see that a woman can exercise her 2nd amendment rights.
re 138: “Condi Rice for example. Strong and a leader.”
I disagree. She has no magic. Also, she stated after 9/11 that nobody could have predicted that airplanes would be used by terrorists for attacks. Terrorists have been using airplanes for decades to attack us in one way or another.
What was that that blew up over Scotland? I believe it was an airplane. Do you suppose that a ‘strong leader’ could intuit from even that one incident, that a plane could also be flown into a building?
@140 You’re delusional and I could usually give a flying monkey fuck what you think.
I’ll say that I found some of the comments from the left towards Russert’s and Snow’s passing to be despicable. However, I have bigger fish to fry, troll.
Of course that fascist shit doesn’t go over very well.
Why else would obama be changing his views on everything from guns to abortions to withdrawing troops from iraq. It’s the same activity all democrat candidates do when trying to appeal to the rest of the country.
Say one thing in the primaries, something different in the general election. Obama, the man of change. Just not the change the left had hoped for. The left hoped that obama would stand up for his principles instead of being like every other pandering politician. I head obama might give up on his nascar sponsorship.
Considering obama still hasn’t released his fundraising totals from the last month it isn’t looking good. His donations have been dropping the last few months.
@144
I’m delusional, eh? Thanks for that objective, and well reasoned response. The fact is, I don’t give a fuck what you think either. I just wish all you leftie goons would face up to your own hypocrisy. Do that and I’ll be happy. That’s my goal here. I expect the same of the right, btw.
I’m a Libertarian, so I see the problems inherent in both sides. In my opinion, however, there are more of them from the left-wing side than the right.
What happens when the hater becomes just like those he hates?
You’re just as intolerant as any right-winger.
Your hate is astounding. And it didn’t take any psych101 to see that.
How liberal must one be to believe in the messiah obama??
This is even better than the right-wing gun nuts wanted. Obama is now going to fund and supply weapons to civilians. And not just half ass funding, he wants us civilians to be just as powerful and strong as the real military.
How do liberals feel about this? Or is this simply another lie to get elected and liberals don’t care if their president is a liar before he even gets into office.
Where’s the change? Seems like more of the same.
Obama and his public service, what a joke.
$4,000 tax credit for 100 hours of “service” work per year? Shit, I already do that many hours in volunteer work. All I have to do to save, oops, I mean steal $4000 from the government is sign up for a college class.
Marvin (at 12:21 PM)
No, Marvin. It’s what happens when the trolls start piling on from all sides. It’s frustrating and annoying to have folks spew drivel, just looking for a reaction.
Let’s face it. As a wide-open liberal blog, most of you righties aren’t here for the discussion. You’re here to annoy the liberals. Then, on those occasions when you succeed, you start claiming that this shows how full of hate we are.
No, we aren’t “full of hate”, and when you deliberately try to provoke anger, it’s more than slightly hypocritical to act offended when someone gets angry.
But you already know that.
As to the topic of this thread. We have righties that have, on this very board, pointed at the cover of the New Yorker and said “This is the first New Yorker magazine cover that made me proud to be an American. You donks sure can dish out the lies but can’t handle the truth.”
As I doubt that Ms Dog would know satire if it bit her on the butt, I’m figuring that she meant every word, and that she and her ilk will be pointing at the cover and using it as propaganda.
The more sophisticated among them will use the line about how satire must have a grain of truth to work.
No, the reason for the cover is just someone realizing that it will cause controversy, and as such, will sell magazines. The New Yorker has made the decision that circulation is more important than ethics, as has the artist.
The fact that the liberals on this thread are so offended by the New Yorker Mag cover just highlights how thin-skinned they are. Just like when they call Bush a “chimp” and then get offended when someone compares Obama’s satellite ears to those of “curious George”.
If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out, kids.
As for John B @ 150, this site is nothing but wall to wall drivel and most times resembles only a hate site led by the lead Donkey Goldy. Don’t try to post like you’re holier than thou when you know full well the extent of the hate that is exhibited by Goldy’s faithful marionettes like YLB, ByByGobstopper, Roger Regurgitated Roadkill, et al.
It’s poor satire because it feeds the preconceptions of the right. Our fear is that there are too many in the right’s ‘base’ that will take the picture as a serious representation of the Obamas.
It packs a lot of cliches into itself. Negative cultural cliches are the bread and butter of the manipulative politics of the right. There’s no need for the supposedly intellectual New Yorker to provide grist for the noise machine’s mill.
John Barelli is spot-on correct in his analysis.
Mr. D.
Again, the folks running this site make no secret that it is a liberal blog. Neocons and other far-right folks like you aren’t posting here because you’re looking for debate.
You’re looking to poke a stick at the liberals.
If the site was as bad as you claim, then you would simply remove it from your “favorites” list, and we’d never hear from you again.
My guess is that you neocons come here to break up any debate simply because some effective discussion actually happens here.
As long as you can keep everyone riled up, and keep the rhetoric level at “max”, you know that effective discussion of issues is much more difficult.
And since you neocons cannot tolerate actual discussion and debate (as it shows the emptyness and hatred in your philosophy) you come here to prevent it.
I know how angry some of the posters here get when dealing with the likes of you, and cannot blame them. While I’m sure that you don’t (or more likely won’t) see it, your own post is a perfect example.
Darryl@141: Too much sun today?
HAs clueless idiot always uses his single attack method, Guilt By Association. If you don’t think lock step like HAs clueless idiot, you are associated by him to others. It took me four continual I don’t like John McCain posts before it got past his BDS!
@154 “I don’t like John McCain”
So what? You’re still an ass.
@156 And you being the HOLE proves what?
Oh vacuous opening?
Emptiness?
Vacancy?
Bybygoober can take care of the HOLE!
@156 Being as you are from the party of mule fuckers, I figured you of all people would know what an ass is. Consider it as another way of telling you to go fuck yourself.
Funnny how none of our resident w-nuts bring up Obama’s new lead in the Holy Rasmussen Poll:
153 JB
Some people are paid to come in here and repeat talking points.
@159 I bet the BIAW pays for some of the local blog trolls.
Hey, Puddy. Long time, no argue.
I was really sorry to hear that you’d switched on Senator Obama. Yes, I understand that some of his positions are real problems for you (especially on abortion), but I was still disappointed.
The comment about Michelle Obama is more than a bit over the top, don’t you think? Heck, even Laura Bush figured out what she was talking about.
The one real point that you could make about her statement is that it shows that she doesn’t have much experience in hardball politics, where the slightest misstatement will be pounced upon and never forgotten.
One of these days we’re going to have to sit down over lunch and have a discussion of issues. DL is a bit out of the way for me, especially as I do not like to drive after having drunken anything stronger than Diet Pepsi.
(The last time I drank enough to be legally impared was in 1979, but even so, if I ever got into an accident where someone was hurt, the fact that I was “legal” wouldn’t make me feel any better about it.)
Next time you’re out my way, give me a call. The new restaurant next door is pretty good.
Steve there is a horse in Enumclaw waiting for you…
Hey Steve and HAs clueless idiot:
Looks like Andrea Mitchell of NBC News pegged you perfectly:
Her words – “The only question there is whether it’s is too sophisticated to actually be perceived the way it is intended.”
yessiree – A Moonbat newswoman knows her audience.
John Barelli: I joined the “No Presidential Candidate for ME Crowd” after I started investigating some of Barack’s positions. HAs clueless idiot kept telling me Barack was the most liberal senator in America so how could I vote for him. Since that was soooooooooo important to HAs clueless idiot, I started performing some PuddyResearch. Well the more I PuddySearched the stranger it became. I posted some YouTube events here. They were ignored by the 16%ers because they revealed a Barack most of you want to hide from.
So in reality Barack lost my vote due to HAs clueless idiot. If he didn’t keep attacking me for voting for him I would have blindly voted for him as a black man. HAs clueless idiot had no argument because if you go back to 2005 or 2006 I first stated I didn’t like John McCain. But I already proved Robert Bennett wanted to remove McCain from the Keating 5 because he didn’t do anything wrong and leave the 4 Donkey Senators to take the fall but for Common Cause because they needed McCain to make it not look partisan which in reality is was.
HAs clueless idiot: Did you watch Whoopi on the view. She said: “Do you know that we are the only people in the United States who have to have their voting rights okayed every couple of years? Did you know that they have to vote on the Voting Rights Bill for black folks? Can we just, can one of you candidates- can we just take care of that so I don’t have to worry every year, my God am I not?”
I know you look up to her HAs clueless idiot.
HAs clueless idiot: Did you just watch CNN’s Shituation Room?
Obama said:”I’m going to call in the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and give them a new mission, and that is to bring the war in Iraq to a close. We are going to get out.”
There is a small problem with Obama’s statement. The JCoS do not have operational command of U.S. military forces. The various commanders of the various UCCs (Unified Combatant Commands) control the soldiers. That’s why Schwartzkopf was on TV so much. I guess Obama didn’t pay attention.
Rick D. – If this site is “wall to wall drivel” and resembles a hate site, maybe you should go back to your own hate site at (un)SoundPolitics. You should certainly make the top ten list of most inane posts there.
The peculiar assortment of simpletons, ninnies and nitwits there make up for the pathetically low volume of posts and content with the shear absurdity of the hissy-fits…. Still boo-hooing over the 2004 Rossi loss as one example that comes up nearly every day. That clown in the car representing Obama’s possible Nascar entry is just priceless… OH MY! What a knee-slapper! That must have taken the entire staff there hours to come up with that gem of an idea.
So continue to call Obama a communist, refer to him as Barry or “Hussien”, keep repeating the “bitter” comments over and over again…. Because that’s all you have. McDole, and his supporters have no real policies to run on, so might as well resort to the 5th grade school-girl tantrums from now until November…. Good luck with that.
@162 Lame. Oh, and Andrea Mitchell is a moonbat? Yeah, right. The vertical corporate media structure is all about getting “moonbats” some airtime. You really do need a reality check, Puddy.
164 – Stupes just like you tried to peg everyone here as a bunch of Hillary fans, I did the same for you. When Roger Rabbit said Hillary was the best for Prez, you said you “knew it all along”.
Surprise, surprise.. Most people here are for Barack. Been there, done that with the dynasty thing.
So how does it feel being pegged? Now you’re not not voting for Barack this fall even though you said his election would break the glass ceiling for many black people in this country.
Fine. I knew it all along.
You call Daddy Love “Nambla” for no better reason than his handle and characterize ACLU as being for pedophilia because they represented NAMBLA when someone tried to sue them for something they had nothing to with. This is your so-called logic. OK. Fine. If you throw the lever for Rossi, you promote pedophilia.
He’s Catholic. “The inference is there.” Again, YOUR logic. How does it feel?
And look at the cavalcade of lunatic wingnuts trying to keep a black man down: little Rickie Dumbass who calls Obama “curious george”, Mark who called Obama a “jigaboo”, doofus who believes that magazine cover represents “the truth”, Surreal Mark who called him “a pretty boy in a suit” and on and on.
You made your bed here. Obviously you’re only too happy with lying in it.
As for me I’m sticking with Obama. He’ll make a fine Prez even when we progressives organize to override some of his vetoes.
167 – McDole.. LMAO!! I like that.
How about McSameDole as Bush?
Steve you are as dense as spent uranium.
Andrea Mitchell – “I don’t feel that there is bias in what we do at NBC News. And I don’t think there’s bias in CBS or ABC.”
Andrea Mitchell discusses Chris Matthews – “I don’t think he’s a liberal thinker.” But Chris Matthews gets tingles down his leg around liberals Andrea.
Andrea Mitchell – “Fox is biased” – Golly most 16%ers here parrot that sme phrase. Someone lacking gravitas?
Andrea Mitchell on the Kentucky and Oregon Primary Night – “Other Clinton loyalists, but realists, say that that electoral map is a stretch in one regard: There are … Republican governors and Secretaries of State, if you will, Katherine Harris-type election officials in those states. He has to go up against the establishment, which would be Republican, and he has to figure out a way to get a fair vote, if he’s the nominee, in those red states.”
Well, Pud, I take YouTubes from liberals with more than just a pinch of salt, and stuff posted by the far right simply gets ignored.
Frankly, there are more than just a few folks over on my side of the aisle that are angry with Senator Obama because the position that they expected him to have differed from the position he actually held.
So (for example), somehow this Constitutional scholar that had said that he believed that the Constitutional right to bear arms was an individual right managed to annoy some of us by agreeing with the Supreme Court when it said the same thing.
(None of which, of course, says that he doesn’t deplore the level of violence in the cities. Just that the Constitution doesn’t allow blanket prohibitions of guns.)
I don’t agree with Senator Obama about all of his positions (I’m more than slightly annoyed about the FISA vote, for example) but I think he’s being honest about his positions (folks talking about “flip-flopping” are generally folks that never bothered to actually learn what his original position was) and really will try to do what he sees as best for our country.
So, while I can understand that you may decide you cannot vote for Senator Obama due to his positions on some issues, don’t let some YouTube posts (and certainly don’t let any post here) be the deciding factor.
As for Senator McCain, any debate about the Keating debacle is, at this point, moot. His current stands on torture, the war, and the economy make him unacceptable.
As Christians, we both know that when the choice is between torturing someone and dying, we’re supposed to be willing to die. “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”
And at this point, when the Iraqi government is publicly asking for a timetable for our withdrawing troops, anyone suggesting that we should be staying in Iraq indefinitely is simply refusing to face reality.
And the idea that removing a tax on the oil companies will somehow lower gas prices (rather than further enrich the oil companies) suggests that the man is either completely clueless about the situation or is being deliberatly deceptive.
Once again HAs clueless idiot is stating mistruths.
1 – HAs clueless idiot was for Deadwards
2 – Pelletizer, FnF and others were for Heilary.
Go back and check the HA tapes Goldy.
People came over to Barack begrudgingly such as Pelletizer.
You knew nothing, and you still don’t know anything. I of all my siblings cousins and nieces and nephews will not be voting for president. But many of my family understand my reasoning. Unlike HAs clueless idiot who for the most part never explains himself – Mr. “I know why Barack has this position but I won’t tell you my sources” clueless idiot.
Regarding NAMBLA – what does the name mean? Why would someone want to support their right to do that? That’s why you are Yearns4 Little Boys. (I love it but I’ll still use HAs clueless idiot – because you can’t buy a clue.
Regarding Rossi – to infer because he’s catholic he’s a pedophilic person is like saying bybygoober has a brain. Since we know from everyday proof bybygoober lacks a brain…
If you noticed in my attacks on Obama, I’ve never used any racial slurs or supported anyone who has. But you live by GUILT BY ASSOCIATION. Since I don’t agree with your politics I’m guilty. Well HAs clueless idiot, that type of ad hominem attack doesn’t work and I’ll reject it every time FOOL.
John Barelli – How can he say he supports the WA DC gun ban in Feb then say he agrees with the Supreme Court position which struck down the law last month?
Why don’t people enforce the existing laws? You use a gun in a crime there is no plea bargain. Up the river with the maximum even if they tried to kill bybygoober.
Now regarding the tax on oil companies, he’s talking about the federal gas tax of 18.4 cents per gallon. That’s greater than the 9.5 cents profit after taxes. What people jump all over is the $10MMM profit/quarter after they paid over $15MMM Federal taxes above the 18.4 we pay direct to the Feds.
@171 Your delusions are getting the best of you. Not that I give a shit, but it’s fun to watch you slide over the edge.
Puddybud (at 3:21 PM)
Well, Pud, you have to go back to the original quotes, rather than what the pundits said about them.
In your example, folks said a lot of things about what Senator Obama said. The actual quotes from the Senator are:
So, the Senator wasn’t giving a specific endorsement of the DC gun law, but making the simple statement that gun laws per se were not automatically illegal.
As a Senator from Illinois, I doubt that he actually studied the DC law in the kind of detail that would have been required to say whether it was Constitutional or not.
And considering that it took a small army of lawyers and a bunch of judges to come to a rather divided opinion on that law, I can’t really blame him for simply making a general statement of his beliefs and leaving it at that.
As for why they don’t follow your suggestion about no plea bargains and maximum sentencing, well, the courts and prisons are jammed to overflowing. Mind you, I don’t necessarily disagree, but still, there’s got to be a better solution.
Oh, and as for the talk of 9.5 cents profit after taxes.
If I have a product that cost me a dollar, then I sell it to my buddy for two dollars, and he sells it to his buddy for three dollars, and he sells it to another buddy for four dollars, who then sells it back to me for four dollars, ninety and one-half cents, I can legitimately claim that when I sell it to you for five dollars, I’ve only made 9.5 cents profit.
But… somewhere in this mix, there was a total of four dollars of profit on that product.
And while the oil companies did pay quite a bit in taxes, they also received large sums in tax credits and outright subsidies.
How much? We may never know. There are so many interlocking boards, related companies, offshore accounts, etc… that it’s a bookkeepers nightmare.
But according to their own corporate reports, ExxonMobil is currently the most profitable company in the world. If people are willing to shell out (pun intended) 4.25 per gallon of gas, that is what they will charge, and any reduction in taxes will go to the corporate bottom line.
By the way, I really can’t get angry at ExxonMobil for that. They’re a corporation, and it’s what they’re supposed to do. Maximize profits.
If our government is so lax with public dollars (in subsidies and credits) that ExxonMobil can take some, then I would expect it.
You can’t get angry at a pig for eating your dinner if you put it in the trough.
JamesA@ 167 ~ I think you meant to say “sheer absurdity of the hissy-fits” and not “shear“…but I’m sure that it was a freudian slip tucked in a Sheep joke.
I know, I know, you were just trying to help it over the fence…
He’s been like that the whole time I’ve been here. He’s not the only one that freely exhibits his hate for his fellow man.
See above
See above. (steve was angry before I got here)
Seriously? Have you never visited daily kos? Tony Snow dies, huffington has to ban all comments because she knows the disgusting words that will be spewed in the comments. Want me to find a link of disgusting things said about tony’s death? Yeah, I already know that beneath the skin of a liberal is a hater.
Unfortunately, that is the drag about freedom of speech, everyone gets it. Speaking of freedom of speech, why is it only people on the left that are for the fairness doctrine?
I believe the facts say otherwise depicted in the cover.
Another great thing about america, you get to believe that.
Yeah, funny how the smart people make the rules and then it comes back to bite them on the ass.
I wonder in the past when the artist has drawn “satire” about republicans if the readers assumed that was an actual representation of republicans because they wanted to believe the worst.
For one thing, the new yorker is a business. If I owned a piece of them, they better try and figure out how to make a profit. And there’s nothing wrong with that. I’m sure you feel the same way.
Ethics because someone doesn’t see the satire in their satire? Isn’t that what makes america so great, we all don’t have to agree on what “art” is.
Priceless.
Do you think mccain would have made the same gaffe?
Does experience matter. Does knowledge of the command structure matter. We’ll find out when obama admits his bad judgement and throws someone under the bus. Do they have a lottery system at the obama camp or like the aztecs do people self sacrifice and throw themselves under the bus voluntarily?
(notice how cult like obamamanics are becoming)
@178 “(steve was angry before I got here)”
I don’t have anger towards the likes of you. Scorn, yes. Ridicule, yes. Anger, no. You deserve the first two but you aren’t worth the third. Alas, being a fascist troll, you’re simply too stupid to ever get it. And that’s a problem you’ll take with you for the rest of your pathetic and insignificant life.
@179 Under the bus? You mean like Phil Gramm?
I saw many posts like this one on the internet. Is it worth it to have a cynical laugh?
Cora,
I understand your sadness and I share in it. That cover takes me back to being a child and seeing a caricature of “Sambo” in a book. I remember how upset I felt as a little Black girl seeing that cartoon that was meant to demean an entire group of people. I believe that this cover is part of a consistent effort on the part of the media to destroy Barack and Michelle. It has been confirmed to me tonight. I will continue to pray for their safety because I believe that these types of images help to sow the seeds of hatred. I shudder to think what this type of cover will provoke the crazy bigots to do. This is so upsetting.
Did you see republicans cry when rolling stone had that cute little pic of mcsame last month.
Look at the way liberals act when it’s their messiah being satirized.
Yet they see “freedom of art” when crosses are submerged in urine and republicans are being made fun of.
I never said you directed your anger at me. I was talking about the hate/anger festering deep inside of you.
Projection, Psych 101. Too bad you believe yourself a fascist and feel stupid, Steve. That’s probably a real downer for you.
Don’t you just hate it when someone projects and reveal things nobody really needs to know about them?
178 MS
Yeah, why is that?
Can we submerge Republicans in urine? Art for art’s sake, you know.
@184 Projecting projection. Amazing. With that last post you went straight from neurosis to psychosis. Thanks for sharing, troll.
@186
That you would consider anything involving urine as art says something pretty disturbing, I would say.
@183 Making fun of Republicans is indeed an art. Some here at HA excel at it and it’s often at your expense, Marvin, which you likely don’t appreciate very much. And yet you keep coming back for more. That’s one thing about trolls I like – you keep coming back for more.
@187
Nice diagnosis. Physician, heal thyself!
@190 My bet is that you don’t so much have a past as much as you have a clinical case history.
@192
And my bet is that you sleep under the Aurora bridge and use the computers in the Public Library to post here.
@192
“@192 And my bet is that you sleep under the Aurora bridge and use the computers in the Public Library to post here.”
You sleep under the Aurora bridge? That’s a shame. Maybe you ought to get some kind of job so you can pay for a room.
With regards to Senator Obama’s mention of the Joint Chiefs.
You both realize, I presume, that one of the tasks of the Joint Chiefs is to act as the primary uniformed advisors to the President.
Presidents (even President Bush) routinely consult directly with the Joint Chiefs, and yes, the President gets to set the overall mission.
I would expect the President, upon deciding on a new overall mission, to consult the Joint Chiefs, both for input as to the practical applications and effects of the new mission, and because the Joint Chiefs will be the folks issuing many of the implementing directives.
Will he consult with SecDef and others? Certainly. It’s likely that he and his choice for SecDef will have long planning meeting prior to inauguration day. Certainly the SecDef will be standing right beside him as he speaks to the Joint Chiefs.
As any military member knows, the Commanding Officer will often address his/her command to spell out a new mission. As Commander-in-Chief, Senator Obama is saying that he will do just that with the Joint Chiefs. He’ll give them a new mission, and has already said that he’ll ask for their input on how best to carry out that mission.
So, to somehow claim that Senator Obama doesn’t understand the Defense Department because he didn’t list everyone that would be party to that meeting or the planning that will go into it is simply disingenuous.
But, you already knew that.
@193
Yawn! Are you truly that unimaginative?
@195 I could be dead for a week and still display more imagination than you could ever, well, imagine.
@196
If you were dead for a week, you certainly wouldn’t be any less intelligent than you’ve shown yourself to be, true enough. But then I suppose that isn’t saying a whole lot – You’re pretty dull, as it is.
@197 Not surprisingly, that was really quite lame of you. Don’t they have some snappy comebacks in that little commie-fascist handbook of yours that you can use here?
@199
Couldn’t have been too lame, since you had nothing but your insipid “commie-fascist” comment as a response.
I was expecting that one to come out, actually. Glad to see I’d read you correctly.
On Afghanistan, however, independents side more closely with Republicans than with Democrats. Majorities of Republicans and independents think the war in Afghanistan was worth fighting and that the effort there is linked to the eventual defeat of terrorism more broadly. Majorities of Democrats disagree.
ABC link
Now we see why obama has to track to the right to have a chance at this election.
Goldy’s marionettes are really up in arms today. They’re usually a miserable bunch as it is, but with it being Monday (not that any of HA trolls work or anything, most are state-funded) and The New Yorker Magazine putting Barry Fauxbama and his “Angela Davis” looking ‘hood-rat wife on the cover as they did…….. boy are they steamed. Good!
But alas, what can we really expect from Goldy’s backbencher’s anyway?
Garbage in/ Garbage out
I guess for satire that cover hit too close to home. Their reaction is all the proof you need. hehehehe
“199. I-Burn spews: @199”
You really do need to get your act together.
@201 “not that any of HA trolls work or anything, most are state-funded”
You have absolutely no clue, and probably no job, either. Not that I give a shit.
If you noticed in my attacks on Obama, I’ve never used any racial slurs or supported anyone who has. But you live by GUILT BY ASSOCIATION.
If you’re saying you don’t live by guilt by association, you’re totally oblivious or lying.
You associated everyone here with Hillary – you were wrong.
You associate Daddy Love with NAMBLA – you’re wrong.
You associate ACLU with supporting pedophilia – you’re wrong.
You’ve dragged tons of right wing bullshit associating people here with that – you’re wrong.
As for your peeps here – you certainly don’t go out of your way to condemn them for their racism all the while going on and on about “racist donk”. Well THAT kind of ad hominem attack is hypocritical BULLSHIT.
Regarding NAMBLA – what does the name mean? Why would someone want to support their right to do that?
Hardly anyone in their right mind does but that doesn’t mean they aren’t entitled to civil rights just like people with darker skin color.
You keep deflecting the real issue so I hope you’re happy with throwing the lever for Dino Rossi. A vote for him is a vote for pedophilia by YOUR logic – not mine.
201 – Little Rickie Dumbass, you’re wrong again.
We’re laughing that Faux News and e-mail bullshit you right wing stooges love and the dumbass mentalities that buy that crap.
Yearns4 Little Boys ~ You’ve been on this thread all day long squealing about the Magazine cover with Barry OhBummer! and his hoodrat wife parodied like the clowns they are. When you aren’t peeking in windows with that beady, little pervert eye of yours, you’re in this blog spouting whatever bile you can hack up with a single digit IQ such as yours. OhBummer has had a free ride from the press so far, so it’s good to see some balls shown by the New Yorker Magazine clowning on Democratic nominee for a change. President McCain is in your future…….so get used to it you little perv.
@207 Let me guess…, you’re just another sleazy Republican pedophile. Shit, that was just too damned easy.
Anybody else notice that Republicans don’t talk about family values anymore? Can’t say that I blame them. Why remind the electorate of Republican moral decay, decadance and degredation?
The Republicans let people like Micky Edwards know that they’re no longer welcome in the party, all the while embracing the likes of Larry Craig and David Vitter. That’s Republican family values on display for all to see. Is it any wonder the Republican party is headed for the backwaters of American politics and that they’ll likely stay there for at least a generation? They have no one to blame but themselves.
Let me know when ‘puddy’ is done bitch-slapping you in here Steveyboy, I might take a turn or two myself backhanding you, as you appear to enjoy it.
Projection, Psych 101. So anyway, too bad you’re a sleazy Republican pedophile, Steve. That’s probably a real downer for you.
Don’t you just hate it when someone projects and reveal things nobody really needs to know about them?
John Barelli: Sorry for the delay as I was watching the homerun derby in the first baseball park I ever visited. Yep Went to Yankee Stadium first before catching the Phillies.
So back to Obama. He is trying to be on both sides of the issue. The Constitution is there for a reason. A city, county or state can’t arbitrarily take away a right unless through a constitutional convention and 3/4 states ratify the change. So he claims a common sense reason to modify gun ownership. Well how is gonna modify criminal minds? Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. Lock up the scum and gun violence drops. Let silly libbie judges loose and gun violence goes up.
So Obama was trying to play both sides and he was wrong.
John, I used the DOE government site to prove how the 9.5 cents was derived. Once the oil company delivers the gas to the middle man they are out of the loop.
If you were paying attention, I actually went through this with GBS earlier this year when Gas was 3.40 in Seattle. I actually came up to $3.409 when I added it all up. So check the HA tapes so you can figger it out. Don’t be like these other 16%er fools here and drink the tax the oil company kool-aid!
John Barelli@194:
When McCain makes a gaffe, the 16%ers here say he’s too old, or some other “pithy” attack. When Obama makes a gaffe, you and others come to his rescue. Well you can’t have it both ways.
I remember the Reagan-Mondale October 1984 debate cuz Puddy Remembers. Reagan said: “I want you to know that also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent’s youth and inexperience.”
HAs Eye of Porn clueless idiot@205. Now that was a Coherent thought – NOT
Prove – where I said everyone here was a Heilary jock strap. I said many were FOOL!
Regarding Daddy Love – well he just wrote about urine. So maybe I misjudged him and it should be Daddy Golden Showers of Love!
ACLU supported NAMBLA – YES! Hey I used the HAs clueless idiot method GUILT BY ASSOCIATION
You can’t even prove what you are writing. I alreasy proved what it was you Deadwards jock strap. Even after Deadwards was out you still wrote later you supported him. Then you switched to Obama. And no I ain’t gonna provide the link cuz you know you wrote it.
Keep trying HAs Eye of Porn clueless idiot. Maybe you need the SEIU wife to add some gravitas to your posts.
Steve, you need to stop looking in the mirror when you post on Horses Ass. All of your self-hatred flows through your fingers onto the keyboard. Go back and reread post #76.
Memorize truths.
Puddy,
“Too much sun today?”
I wish.
“135. YLB spews: Poor Stupes – he’s made his bed with the little Rickie Dumbasses of the world who call Obama a monkey.”
Apparently you misunderstood what YLB was saying. He most certainly was NOT claiming that you were calling Obama a monkey.
You asked a question:
“Where did I agree or call Barack a monkey except in your silly stupid mind?”
And I asked where someone made either claim (agree with or actually call Obama a monkey). You’ve not shown evidence of either.
“HAs clueless idiot always uses his single attack method, Guilt By Association.”
No…he was not implying that YOU call or condone calling Obama a monkey. Hence, I must conclude that you misunderstood YLB’s response.
But, more importantly, Puddy, we are still wondering if McCain’s statement, “I really didn’t love America until I was deprived of her company” makes him a traitor in your eyes. (And by asking the question I am not suggesting that you are [or are not] a McCain fan)
Here’s the link again: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkPUBn3vyoM
@211 Marvin, What a loser. By imitating me you only show everybody how much your chain has been yanked and you invite me to keep yanking. However, if you must play the fool, then please feel free to continue.
@216 Puddy, I don’t waste time or energy with hate. I do direct a measure of scorn towards America-hating fascist traitors, even a small-time shit like you. Hate is your issue, not mine. Yours seems to be some deep seated neuroses played out in some fantasy-fascist arena. I bet it’s an early childhood thing. Didn’t anybody love you?
And regarding your post @76 you referenced, Jonah Goldberg, you’re not. You’re probably too freaking stoopid to grasp where that leaves you, one to ten, on the scale of Stupid to Really Fucking Stupid. Here, you’re too slow, let me help you. You’re really fucking stupid, Pud.
Like I said before Steve…
…Pud’s like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders.
RudeASS, Since you admit you were a chicken and didn’t volunteer for military service – you’re worse than a chicken.
Steve, since you claim I hate America, what did you do when Katrina struck?
I know teach I know – he sat on your fat ass. Puddy and family spent our winter European vacation money and volunteered in Mississippi.
Nuff said you commie cock sucker!
Darryl: When someone says:”Poor Stupes – he’s made his bed with the little Rickie Dumbasses of the world who call Obama a monkey.”
What does the phrase “make you bed with” mean? Take you time Darryl. From there you go downhill fast.
Deep thought: If this cover had really been a funny and effective satire of right-wing ideas about the Obamas, wingnuts would not be defending it.
173 Pud
And here you argue that you are so good at looking things up. I’m thinking not so much.
Personally, I liked the cover because it got so many thin skinned liberals squealing out of some kind of self righteous indignation. What I find most amusing is one group of Liberals trying to make a statement (New Yorker magazine) finds themselves the target of other leftists who lack the intelligence to make the logical leap of understanding the message the magazine was attempting to portray. OOoops!!
The Chitown Assclown has had a free ride this entire election, so it’s always nice to see when a message get’s misinterpreted and ends up lampooning the very guy they intended to help.When Barry OhBummer loses in November, look for this cover to be one of the excuses given by the nutty left as to why yet again, in a down year for Republican’s and its brand, Democrats failed yet again to ascend to the White House.
You just can’t help but love the trainwreck otherwise known as the Democrat party.
Rick D @ 225:
Really? Are you positive about that?
Would you be willing to give Goldy $1,000 to hold and I’ll do the same and place a manly wager on who wins the White House?
At first, my reaction was similar to that of Atrios – I see what they’re getting at, but it was all too accurate a representation of the way idiots see the Obamas so it wasn’t all that funny. But then I looked over this thread and some of the other reactions by conservatives, and I’m coming around to the view that the cartoon was pretty darned good.
Some of the best satire is found when the targets don’t realize they’re being made fun of. And so I say to G. Gordon Liddy, Jonah Goldberg, Atlas Juggs, our resident Stuck on Stupids, and so many others: Thanks for the laughs.
Actually, when you think about it, this is the best thing that the New Yorker could have done.
Look at the firestorm in the media it created. All the lies brought to bear on all the news stations. They had NO CHOICE but to address all the lies spready by the Republicans.
For all the IDIOTS that believed these rumors they now realize it was all bullshit.
Obama’s camp played this just right. By getting on the defensive right away, it caused the media to give it more coverage than the normally would. McCain was forced to condem the cover, he agrees with the LEFT!! – the Flipper.
By the end of the week so much will be talked about the lies on this cover that no reasonable person will believe them any more.
For the piece of shit morons who insist on believing that those lies are the truth, well, those are the same idiots who think George W. Bush is a good president. You can’t fix stupid.
In the end, this was a complete win for Obama.
Daddy Golden Showers of Love@225: I guess rhetorical questions are difficult for your single celled mind. HAs clueless idiot is also of the same vein.
Maybe you are him are the same?
ATJ@227: It was your side that coughed at it.
Andrea Mitchell said your sheeple are too dumb to comprehend it. reread #163
Chris Matthews on his Softballs show said “The right will be using that as t-shirt material within the next couple of weeks.”
Et tu?
Puddy,
‘When someone says:”Poor Stupes – he’s made his bed with the little Rickie Dumbasses of the world who call Obama a monkey.’
‘What does the phrase “make you bed with” mean? Take you time Darryl. From there you go downhill fast.’
Sure…I’m happy to explain.
First: What it DOESN’T mean (or even imply) is that YOU have called Obama a monkey.
Second: What it DOES mean is that “little Rickie Dumbasses of the world” have called Obama a monkey.
Third: It suggests that you have ideologically aligned yourself with a particular side. And some members of that side have called Obama a monkey.
The intent of the comment was to point out that your ideological positions have puts you on the “same team” as the bigots. The point wasn’t to imply that you are a bigot, rather it was intended to shame you (who the author expects would find the monkey comments distasteful) for putting yourself in ideological proximity of those who take it too far.
Your mistake was in assuming the author was implying you were a bigot. It wasn’t…in fact, the statement is only effective if the author knew you would find the “monkey” statements distasteful.
Hope that offers some clarification. (Oh…and please note that I have not offered support or disagreement with the original statement. My original comment simply pointed out your misunderstanding of the author’s meaning).
So…I’ve answered your question, how about you answer my question.
We are still wondering if McCain’s statement, “I really didn’t love America until I was deprived of her company” makes him a traitor in your eyes.
Again, here is a link for reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkPUBn3vyoM
@221 Glad you did something about Katrina. Geez, you single-handedly outperformed FEMA as managed by our inept Republicans. As for me, sitting on my “fat ass”, I merely equalled FEMA’s performance.
So as not to confuse Darryl-ict and his fellow liberal lemmings. I did not call Obama a “monkey”.
I referred to him as ‘curious george’ due to his oversized satellite dish ears @ 133. Any inference you took from that is based solely on your own subconscious racism so don’t attach your insecurities to my intentions.
However, I can find proof of the same squealers that took offense to it as having called Bush “Chimp” “mcChimp” “chimpy” etc. with glee.
Kind of see the hypocrisy there can’t you ladies?? Of course you can’t….blind partisanship prevents rational thought.
GBS @ 226
As for letting Goldy hold a Grand for a bet, I might as well just ask one of Seattle’s homeless persons to hold it for me. Afterall, both are jobless and the only source of income appears to be panhandling (bum) and Cyber-panhandling (Goldy). So in short, thanks, but no thanks.
Darryl: I have stated my disdain for McCain so that’s my final answer.
While you try and clean up the shit from HAs clueless idiot, he indirectly is calling me a bigot. If you remember when I said I was voting for Obama for a black break the glass ceiling many here including HAs clueless idiot called me that saying I was only voting for him cuz he’s black. Well the ideological argument being hoisted by HAs clueless idiot is just that. He claims I hang with the people he claims to have called Obama a monkey; plain and simple.
@223 Refering to a black man as “curious george”, the monkey, is somewhat different than refering to a white man as a “chimp”. You dance your dance, but your inference is clear. You call a black man a monkey. You know it. I know it. Everybody here with half a brain knows it.
They say here that RickyD is Puddy’s white alter ego. If true, that would make Puddy/RickyD one strange motherfucker.
Wrong –
Both are intended to insult
A) in Bush’s case his intelligence and/or facial expressions
B) in Obama’s case to his satellite sized ears…remember Perot got the same treatment?
The difference is tenderfeet like Steveyboy and his buddy YLB squeal about the exact same behavior that they themselves engage in. Senator Fauxbama is not immune from ridicule just because he’s your candidate, so deal with it boys.
Puddy,
“I have stated my disdain for McCain so that’s my final answer.”
I didn’t ask whether or not you like McCain. I specifically asked whether McCain’s statement, “I really didn’t love America until I was deprived of her company” makes him a traitor in your eyes.
“…he indirectly is calling me a bigot.”
No he didn’t. You misunderstand. He was saying that you hang out with bigots in an ideological sense. Not the same thing.
“He claims I hang with the people he claims to have called Obama a monkey; plain and simple.”
Right…but that is NOT the same thing as calling you a bigot. That is, essentially, saying, “Your ideology has led you to stoop to hanging in the same camps as bigots,” knowing full well that you dislike bigotry.
@237 Pathetic response, troll. Not surprising, considering how fucking stupid you are.
@239
Why are you so threatened by a dissenting opinion? Are you really that insecure? Reading through your posts is a litany of arrogance, denigration, profanity, and self-righteous indignation. Why? Surely you don’t behave in that manner in the real world?
@ 239 – That’s all you get steveyboy.
Single digit IQ’ers like yourself aren’t smart enough to figure out the difference, but then again…..it appears to be a common occurence amongst the “regressive” liberal types, so pathetically, you’re not alone in your ignorance.
@ 240 – Ol’ steveyboy appears to have some angers issues, but then again, most on his side of the political ideologic bent tend to spend alot of time and energy dispensing their hatred in one form or another, so he’s just your run of the mill Seattle leftist in many respects.
They wake up every morning with a “glass half empty” attitude towards life and seek to make those around them as miserable as they are.
@240 and @241 Are you two losers still here?
@240 “Why are you so threatened by a dissenting opinion?”
I’m not. I am disgusted, though, by low-life right-wing, America-hating bigots. Um, that’d be you.
@241 “he’s just your run of the mill Seattle leftist in many respects”
You’re clueless, as usual. Of course, you America-hating fascists aren’t exactly known for your smarts.
@242
You obviously are threatend by anyone not in lock-step with your own narrow, little world view. You can’t begin to formulate any kind of a response that isn’t insulting, or demeaning. I pity you Steve, I really do. You must lead one seriously miserable existence.
@243 Actually, my life is quite good, thank you. Too bad about yours. You hate-filled fascists really need to find a new gig.
Lock-step? No liberal here at HA is lock-stepping with me. They are not threatened by me, nor am I threatened by them. There’s certainly nothing threatening to me about a pip-sqeak, brownshirt, wanna-be fascist prick armed with only a 12 year-old’s vocabulary, such as yourself. What a twit without wit you are.
@244
At least you’re consistent. You’re also deluding yourself. But that is your right.
You might want to consider why your responses are invariably antagonistic with anyone with different opinions than yourself. That is hardly the mark of someone secure in their own existence, Steve. Particularly not for someone who, as I believe you claimed, is working at a white collar profession.
@245 “Particularly not for someone who, as I believe you claimed, is working at a white collar profession.”
Electrical engineer, here, although I always wear golf shirts, never a white collar shirt and tie.
Most liberals here have opinions that are quite different than mine. However, there’s no antagonism between us. You, on the other hand, being an America-hating fascist traitor, are deserving of nothing but scorn from any decent patriotic American, regardless of party affiliation.
@246
Interesting. Okay then, what have I said that makes you think I’m a Fascist? Do you have evidence, or is that simply a pejorative that you toss out at random? A matter of tarring your opponent with some stigma that invalidates anything with which they might respond, whether true or not?
@248 “what have I said that makes you think I’m a Fascist?”
You mean, like, everything you’ve ever posted here? When have you ever posted a comment that didn’t point to your being an America-hating fascist twit?
Dick R @ 233 wrote:
“GBS @ 226
As for letting Goldy hold a Grand for a bet, I might as well just ask one of Seattle’s homeless persons to hold it for me. Afterall, both are jobless and the only source of income appears to be panhandling (bum) and Cyber-panhandling (Goldy). So in short, thanks, but no thanks.
OK, then it seems your only objection is to who holds the money. I trust Puddybud. He’s a conservative, works hard, has plenty of his own money, and I trust him with a grand of my cash.
He is, however, black. Is that OK with you that a “black guy” holds our money?
No problem?!?!
Great. Then, I’ll assume we’ll set a date to meet for lunch, hand Puddy our money and the winner will collect after the elections. Yes?
Yes, of course!
It’s settled. I’ll get a hold of Puddy to make the arrangements. Shit, I’ll even buy lunch for the 3 of us.
Puddy, I’ll give you a 10% rake for holding the cash. And, I mean 10% of the total bets placed for $200 to you.
Sound good? Fuck YES it does!!
Now, Dick R, how much ‘nads do ya have now? Big Guy!
Mr. C.
shit man, I’m about to make and 80% ROI on this bet. Great money if you can find a sucker like Dick R.
I-Burn.
Little Steveyboy isn’t worth the font used on him. His hatred is internal and projected outward – Easy Psych 101 evaluation.
Miserable little troll with a miserable little bridge called HA to defend against all perceived enemies. His only discernible ability is to swear like the adolescent he is. Goldy’s little Marionettes sure are an interesting bunch…
@248
In other words you’re attempting to save face by making things up. Not surprising, in the least Steve. You really shouldn’t take yourself so seriously, you know. All you’re really doing is painting yourself as a fanatic in the same vein as BBG. And that dude is a wanna-be concentration camp guard…
@ 250 – I don’t know any of you mutts on this site and I sure as hell wouldn’t trust anyone here on Goldy’s hate site with a grand of my Ca$h so find another sucker for your lame bet.
My payoff will be coming in here on November 6th and seeing you squeal like a beat dog when your trio of misfits BarryOhBummer/ QueenChristine/ Darcy Burnout lose each of their respective races.
Of course, you’ll be squealing about some stolen election like you did in 2000 and/or rigged voting machines like you did in 2004, cuz liberals can’t handle losing. Not when their religion is their political ideology.
@251 and 252, Sorry, but at this point you guys are starting to bore me. Come up with something a little more imaginative and I’ll consider responding.
For my fascist trolls reading pleasure,
http://www.themodernword.com/e.....shirt.html
You’re both fucking fascist tools, asswipes.
More Projection Steve? Hmmm
….don’t look now Steveyboy, but your tolerance is showing.
@ 254
I pity you Steve. Seriously. Good luck to you, in the future. You’re going to need it.
@255, 256 Hmm, apparently there’s little more than half a brain between the two of you. Try working together off-line on this. Maybe then you’ll come up with something worth a response. Until then, fuck off, twits.
@257
Pretty pathetic, Steve. Keep trying though. And like I said before…Good luck to you in the future. You’re going to need it.
@258 You’re now a waste of my time.
@260
My heart bleeds.
@260 Zzzzzzzzzzzz. Phst! Wha?? Oh, it’s you again. Dumbass. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
@261
Goddamn, that was almost funny, in a silly grade school sort of a way. Still pathetic, but I wouldn’t expect anything else.
@262 Heads up, I-Burn. On the other thread Marvin’s offering $20 to suck some cock, preferably mine, but since I’ve turned him down I’m sure you’ll do in a pinch. Hey, this could be your chance to finally score!
@263
Stupid gay innuendo is the best you can do? Pathetic Steve, just goddamned pathetic.
@264 I hadn’t heard from either one of you. Did you guys hook up?
@265
See #264
@266 I take it that Marvin, um, stiffed you for the $20. That cad!
@267
You’ve already made a fool of yourself, Steve, old boy. I’d suggest you just slink on out before you compound that pitiful lack of judgement.
@269 You need to take this up with Marvin. He’s the one who owes you money. By the way, are you black? If so, he owes you double.
@270
I’ll pray for you Steve. You obviously have some serious issues to deal with.
End of discussion, troll.
@271
Probably a good idea, Steve.
@ 271
Steve thought he was part of a discussion? Wow, the boy is even more delusional that I previously thought.
It’s not my blog and I was kindly asked to stop by a couple of people I respect. So no more from me. Do what you will.
Well, they were right steve. In your case it is better to quit while your still behind.
Maybe some reflection on the last 3 hours of posting might help you work through that so as not to repeat it in the future. Good Luck, mate.
@275 Uh-huh, whatever, Rick.