A new Elway poll (first reported on Publicola) has been released for the 2012 Washington state gubernatorial contest. The poll of 405 registered voters (5% MOE) surveyed from the 18th to the 22nd of July has former Democratic congressman Jay Inslee leading Republican state AG Rob McKenna by 43% to 36%.
The poll reflects a turn-around in the race that has, until now, mostly been led by McKenna:
If you squint a little, you can probably discern a long-term trend away from a McKenna and toward Inslee.
The regional breakdown in the new poll has Inslee leading McKenna in Seattle (+33%), King County outside Seattle (+8%), Pierce and Kitsap (5%), and North Sound (16%). McKenna leads in Eastern Washington (+9), and they are tied “South and West of Puget Sound.”
As you might imagine, Inslee leads among women (+10%), just as he did in the previous Elway poll (+2%) and last weeks Survey USA poll (+9%). More surprisingly, he now leads among men (+3%), reversing McKenna +5% lead in the previous Elway poll and +11% lead in the Survey USA poll.
Elway chalks up the lead change to a shift in preference among independent voters:
Most of the difference between last month’s findings and these is accounted for by a collapse in McKenna support among Independent voters. McKenna led among Independents by 42-29% in June, but Inslee led Independents by 31-29% this month. Meanwhile, the number of undecided Independents jumped from 29% last month to 40% this month. Since Independents are necessary to winning an election here, this volatility indicates a see-saw battle to November.
I subjected the Elway results to a Monte Carlo analysis of a million simulated elections. The results have a great deal of uncertainty as only 322 voters expressed a preference. The final tally gives Inslee 865,677 wins to McKenna’s 126,742 wins. That is, if the election was held now, the poll results suggests Inslee’s lead would hold with a 87.2% probability, and McKenna would win with a 12.8% probability.
Since Statisticians usually consider 95% probability as the cut-off, Inslee’s lead is “within the margin of error.” Here is the distribution of election outcomes from the simulated elections:
Last week’s Survey USA poll (that I analyzed here) was taken on the 16th and 17th of July, immediately before the Elway poll, and had McKenna leading Inslee 42% to 41%. The poll was a little larger than the Elway poll, with 525 of 630 registered voters expressed a preference for Inslee or McKenna.
What happens if we do a similar analysis using both polls jointly? After a million simulated elections, Inslee came out on top 699,377 times and McKenna won 291,968 times. Thus, Inslee would be expected to win a July election with a probability of 70.5% to McKenna’s 29.5%. Here is the distribution of election outcomes:
Statistically, the race is still a tie, of course.
A final point of interest is the “likeability” measure that has Inslee up 34% to 27%. Unfortunately, this wasn’t reported for the previous Elway poll. One must wonder if the reports of McKenna’s negative interactions with the media are taking a toll. Additionally Jay Inslee’s excellent “introductory” ad that began airing on July 8th has probably helped his image and name recognition among voters.
A plausible reason for McKenna’s erosion of support is the recent Supreme Court ruling on, and the ensuing media coverage of McKenna’s role in the lawsuit against “Obamacare.” Just as voters are getting “in the mood” for the 2012 election season in a year with a polarizing presidential election, the ruling has provided a dose of hard partisan information about McKenna.
rhp6033 spews:
Wow – I’m crediting Inslee’s “introductory” ad for the big reversal. McKenna had more name recognition early on, voters just needed to get to know more about Inslee. Western Washington was looking for a reason NOT to support a Republican, and Inslee’s ad made them comfortable in moving toward Inslee, and stay away from McKenna.
I don’t think the general voting public really is following much about McKenna’s character flaws, but the recent incident of him running away from a reporter should help.
rhp6033 spews:
How about this – Gov. Gregoire demands an audit of the Attorney General’s office to determine how much state time and money was wasted in his pursuit to overturn the Affordable Care Act? That should put McKenna in a bit of a bind. If he refuses to cooperate, it shows he’s a jerk and has something to hide. If he tries to drag it out, or hide it, same result. If the auditors can issue a report before the election, they can use that to undermine his claim that he operates his office “efficiently”.
ev spews:
rhp–
would come across as horribly politically motivated. Besides, Gregoire doesn’t give a shit about Inslee. Would be no different than Boehner ordering an audit of Inslee while he was in Congress. Doing these things in the last 3 months prior to election can really backfire. Besides, I don’t think Gregoire really wants her own office exposed publicly. She now cares about one thing…her legacy. Inslee is a fuck.
Ekim spews:
Have you seen Lil’ Bobbie’s new ad?
Reminds me of Barney Fife from Mayberry.
Ekim spews:
Lil’ Bobbie’s a political time bomb out to destroy the state’s economy.
And he blows sheep.
milo (pronounced mee-lo) spews:
re 4: A televised debate between WA state’s Barney Fife doppelganger and Inslee will put the final nail in McKenna’s bid for the governorship.
As long as the Mayberry jokes are running rampant, I think it’s time to call McKenna’s effort a Goobernatorial race.
Baron Samedi spews:
A “$400 billion” ad!!!!!!111111eleven
Zotz sez: Summertime... and the livin' is easy. spews:
It’s just one poll, but wonderful news none the less.
Darryl, it occurred to me: Shouldn’t that big blue part of the graphic be on the left side?
;-)
David Tatelman spews:
Looking good for Jay. The ad really is good, especially the part where it explains he has represented Eastern Washington and Western in Congress. Nobody else can say that. I have always thought that McKenna’s involvement in the suit against Healthcare is his Achilles’ heel, especially when he claimed not to be against the entire Healthcare Plan.