HorsesAss.Org

I just wanted to give a quick link to Danny Westneat’s column in today’s Seattle Times. [Initiatives can be addictive]

Danny’s column sums up the deep ideological passion behind I-892: Tim Eyman’s need to stay relevant by getting an initiative on the ballot… any initiative.

Tim’s been at this business a long time, and he could see months ago that I-864 was likely a repeat of last year’s I-807, an initiative that didn’t have the popular support or the money to collect nearly enough signatures. And so Tim found himself another initiative, this time with deep-pocketed backers that could virtually assure a place on the ballot and an election season in the limelight.

It didn’t really matter to Tim that much of his base — traditional conservatives — strongly oppose expansion of gambling. He chose to abandon his core supporters rather than face another Eyman-free November.

Tim’s for-profit tax revolt has transformed into a for-profit initiative business. Perhaps progressives should hire him to sponsor an income tax?

When the first reports appeared that the Great Canadian Gaming Corporation was Initiative 892’s (Slots for Tots) largest financial backer, both the company and Tim Eyman were dismissive. Contributions were scattered through a number of “local” subsidiaries in an attempt to hide the money’s foreign origins. But it is no surprise that the company that has the most to gain by I-892’s passage would be eager to bankroll its campaign.

Great Canadian has gradually been consolidating its Washington presence, and today the company announced that it is buying out its remaining partner for $5.4 million (US dollars,) giving it 100% ownership of its casino properties in Algona, Everett, Tukwila, Tacoma and Kent.

Great Canadian dominates the British Columbia gambling industry, and it has made public statements about its intention to replicate that model here. Voters need to understand that I-892 is a blatant attempt by a Canadian company to use Canadian dollars to put an initiative on the Washington ballot that serves its own corporate self-interests.

I-892 is a new low for a once populist initiative process that is increasingly hijacked by monied special interests. And it sets a terrible precedent for future initiative campaigns.

I had an incredibly busy week working the media in preparation for the July 2 signature deadline, and then baking pizzas and drinking beer in celebration of its passing. So I didn’t have time to crack open The Seattle Weekly until its last day on the street.

Knute Berger said the word “fuck.”

I double-checked… I hadn’t accidentally picked up a copy of The Stranger. It really was Knute in the Weekly… although he was just borrowing vocabulary from our foul-mouthed VP, Dick Cheney.

Since starting my blog I’ve received a handful of emails from readers who don’t appreciate my occasional, um… colorful language. And recently this site was rejected by Google AdSense for “excessive profanity.”

Personally, I feel that I use just the right of amount of profanity. Besides, if Dick Cheney can say the word “fuck,” and Knute Berger can say the word “fuck,” I don’t see why I can’t say the word “fuck.”

After all, it’s just a fucking word.

Anyway, nice column on Fahrenheit 9/11, Knute. [“Burn, Baby, Burn.”]

And great use of the word “fuck.”

I just got back from a holiday weekend in Brownsville, Oregon. Two days with no cell phone, no email, no blog, and no internet. I didn’t even read a newspaper.

But though I tried to celebrate the failure of I-864 by spending a couple days forgetting Tim Eyman and his self-serving initiatives, the five-hour road trip each way was grim reminder of what could become of Washington if we were to allow Tim to lead us down the government slashing path that Bill Sizemore carved through the heart of our neighbor to the south.

The first thing I noticed upon crossing the border was the relative state of disrepair of large sections of Interstate 5 compared to the Seattle to Portland stretch. The speed limit was constantly jumping between 50 and 65, depending on the quality of the road surface, or the semi-permanent construction zones that seemed unchanged from last year’s trip.

Not that the limits seemed to matter; cars were speeding with impunity. During each two-hour Oregon leg of my round-trip journey, I did not see a single state trooper. A couple local sheriffs had set up revenue generating speed traps, but this hardly seemed a deterrent.

Now I know many people would consider the dearth of radar guns a blessing, and I freely admit that I generally drive 5 to 10 miles over the limit at highway speeds. But it is a mixed blessing at best when I’m traveling with my daughter in the car, and some asshole in an Expedition nearly runs me off the road while weaving through traffic at 90 miles-per-hour.

Local residents confirmed my anecdotal observations, and the cuts weren’t just limited to road maintenance and state troopers. From underfunded public schools to hospital closures to a host of other public services we take for granted, quality of life has declined significantly for many families in communities across the state.

Tim Eyman wants us to demand that our state and local governments do more with less, but Oregon is a harsh lesson in reality. When you cut revenues beyond the bone, governments will do less with less.

In the end, that’s the biggest reason why I-864 failed to generate support: voters understood that they weren’t just being asked to cut taxes… they were being asked to cut essential services.

Tim Eyman arrived at the Secretary of State’s office riding in the back of a pickup truck like a dog… not the grand entrance one might expect from Washington’s self-proclaimed “initiative king.” This was no royal carriage, and there was certainly no throng of loyal subjects waiting to cheer him on.

Over the past few days Tim had repeatedly emailed the 3600 people on his list, asking them to show their support by joining him at the press conference this morning. But as he peered out the canopy window, all he saw were the usual members of the press, the loyal opposition, and angry scowls of determined librarians from the Timberland Regional Library.

It was exactly this kind of inability to energize his base that had led me to call Initiative 864 dead a few weeks back. Tim lacked the money to hire paid signature gatherers in force, and has for years failed to display the motivational and organizational skills necessary to lead a volunteer petition drive. I couldn’t see how, under those circumstances, he could possibly gather 200,000 signatures.

Still, I admit a pang of anxiety as he and the Fagans dropped the tailgate and started to unload their cargo. At times, I can be nearly as arrogant as Tim… had I underestimated his grass roots support? His political savvy? His intelligence? His fashion sense?

Tim was wearing sandals with a business suit! What other shocking surprise might he have in store today?

But all my self-doubt was quickly erased when out from the truck came a folding table adorned with stacks of petitions. This was clearly a prop. I-864 had failed.

The rest of the festivities were fairly anticlimactic. Tim pulled out the usual bullshit chart showing the steep rise in property tax revenues over the past 25 years. (As Steve Zemke says, it’s kind of like whining that candy bars no longer cost a dime.) Then he sat down behind the table and told a few lies before disingenuously opening the floor to questions he had no intention of answering.

When Tim was done, the librarians took their well deserved moment in spotlight, placards in hand, as the TV cameras taped interviews of I-864 opponents. I say “well deserved” because librarians across the state played a key role in defeating I-864, by seeking out paid signature gatherers and countering their lies with the truth. These were some of the so-called “union thugs” Tim has complained about.

Now, I joked about the librarians in my previous blog, and was immediately chastised via email for perpetuating stereotypes. If I did so, I did it lovingly. (And, well… because I thought it was funny.) The truth is, the librarians were an inspiration; this wasn’t a top-down political campaign, but a self-organized effort of dedicated individuals committed not only to saving their own jobs, but to saving the libraries on which we all rely.

Of course the librarians were not alone in opposing I-864. Firefighters undertook a similar effort, as did the Council of County and City Employees through their very effective Voter Education Committee. And the Association of Washington Cities deserves special credit for the tremendous job they did mobilizing their members to get accurate information out to local media as to devastating impact I-864 would have on public services.

And as long as I’m doing a post mortem, I’d like to take a moment to talk about the media.

I have been known, in the words of Knute Berger, to “kick the crap out of the news media.” Why? Because often, they deserve it. (And, it’s fun.)

But I must admit that both I-864 and I-892 have received the most thorough and informative news coverage of any Eyman initiative in recent years. Reporters and editorialists didn’t wait to see if these initiatives qualified for the ballot… they weighed in early and often, ensuring that the handful of voters who still read newspapers had more to work with than Eyman’s sound bites.

And by the way, I genuinely appreciate the way they put up with me, my badgering press releases, and my occasional wild rants.

But enough backslapping for now. I’ll have more to write about I-864, but first I’m going to take a couple days to drink a few beers, watch some fireworks, and relax.

Happy Independence Day.

As first predicted here over three weeks ago [Stick a fork in it, Eyman’s done] Initiative 864 has failed to collect enough signatures to qualify for the ballot! Snatching failure from the jaws of defeat, Timmy inexplicably held a press conference to announce that he had collected about 150,000 signatures, well short of of the 198,000 needed.

As Tim announced the number, a gathering throng of angry librarians was suddenly whipped into a bacchanalian frenzy of joyful celebration. Okay… one of them clapped. But they looked happy. In a quiet, thoughtful way.

I’ll post a more detailed report later in the day.

Tim Eyman has scheduled a news conference for 10AM at the Secretary of State’s office, and asked his supporters to join him as he turns in petitions for I-864. I still don’t believe he has enough signatures to get on the ballot, but we’ll know soon enough.

Anyway, I’m setting off for Olympia bright and early, and will report back as soon as I return.

I’m not entirely sure what to make of Collin Levey’s muddled disquisition on Hollywood, liberals, and anti-Semitism: “Spiritual accessorizing in an era of religious conflict.”

While I enjoy taunting her as a cog in the right-wing propaganda machine, I have to admit that she’s not a bad writer. But this week’s column just isn’t up to her usual standard of ruthless clarity, and since I haven’t been keeping up on the WSJ op/ed pages, deciphering her thesis was all the more difficult.

I believe what Collin is trying to say is that Democrats and their hedonistic liberal backers are anti-Semites, and thus Jews should vote Republican for a change.

Needless to say, I have a couple of problems with her thesis. I myself am a liberal, Democrat-voting Jew… although few people who know me would classify me as a hedonist (with the possible exception of the Hassidic Rabbi next door.)

And I doubt anybody would consider me an anti-Semite (again, with the possible exception of the Hassidic Rabbi next door.) Her attempt to brand liberals and Democrats as anti-Semitic or anti-Israel based on the comments or actions of one individual or another, is at the very least, irresponsible.

In fact, (parenthetically) speaking of the Hassidic Rabbi next door… after accusing us lefties of promoting the absurd notion of an international Jewish conspiracy, Collin actually reinforces this false premise herself:

Jews as a group vote overwhelmingly Democrat.

Jews, as a group, don’t do anything, let alone vote as a block. As a secular Jew raised in a Reformed synagogue, I have little in common with my Hassidic neighbors except maybe a repertoire of colorful Yiddish swear words and a taste for Eastern European Jewish cuisine. And with the Sephardim who seem to dominate the Jewish community here, I don’t even share that.

Indeed, compared to an Orthodox Seattle Sephardim, I have more in common culturally with a New York Irishman (not the least of which being an unfortunate fondness for Irish women.)

The point is, there is no Jewish cabal, no Jewish vote, and no Jewish leaders (at least none I’ve every voted for.) In fact, the very existence of the “Jewish neocons” Collin mentions, contradicts her characterization of us as uniform political block.

While I agree with Collin that anti-Semitism continues to persist, I’m not sure she fully appreciates its subtle insinuation into the debate over support for Israel, nor that she understands the difference between “anti-Semitism,” and good old fashioned religious “Jew hatred.” (The former is a political tool. I suggest Hannah Arendt’s definitive work “Antisemitism.”)

Collin claims “liberal” college campuses are veering towards the plight of Palestinians, and compares this to the staunch support for Israel from the Christian right, implying that Jewish Democrats don’t know who their real friends are.

Speaking as someone who is sympathetic to the aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians (and hostile to the leaders of both,) I think Collin presents an intellectually dishonest choice. And she ignores the fact that the strong support some fundamentalist Christians show towards Israel stems from a profound, doctrinal hatred of the Jewish people.

Unlike most Jews, I have read The New Testament; as sequels go, I found it rather boring (“Jesus this” and “Jesus that.”) But Revelations is, well… a revelation. The prophesy requires the Jews to return to Israel and rebuild the Temple before the Messiah can return. Of course, in the resulting Armageddon, two-thirds of the Jews are destroyed, but well, you can’t have everything.

So while it’s hard to describe the Christian right’s staunch support for Israel as anti-Semitic, a 66% mortality rate certainly doesn’t come across as particularly Jew-friendly.

I’ve always found it offensive when politicians woo Jewish votes by touting their support for Israel. I’m a Jewish American, not an Israeli. Hell… 49% of Israelis don’t even support the Sharon government, why should I?

If this is the best the right wing media echo chamber can do, the Rs are going to have a tough November.

For months now Tim Eyman has been touting the “statistic” that property taxes in WA state have increased from $1 billion in 1980 to $6.25 billion in 2003, a figure he calls “obscene.” He even used a chart based on this stat as the backdrop for his lonely press conference on Monday.

What is really obscene is that this misleading piece of propaganda is repeated in the media without any context or analysis. So I want to give you a preview of some research I plan to post later this week to TaxSanity.org, that examines Tim’s chart and dispassionately explains why it is a meaningless piece of crap.

Take a look at this alternative chart from the state Dept. of Revenue:

Apart from the fact that state and local taxes as a percentage of personal income have actually been declining steadily for years, one thing really jumps out from this chart… that Tim’s start date of 1980 is intentional misleading, as it represents an anomalous twenty-year low in tax rates. Indeed, if you start one year earlier, in 1979, tax burden has clearly and dramatically decreased.

Tim’s figures are taken out of both historical and economic context to present the false impression that government growth is exploding out of control. It fails to consider, population growth, inflation, loss of federal funds, and shifts of revenues from one tax source to another. And oh what a difference a year makes.

According to the Washington State Tax Structure Committee (chaired by Bill Gates Sr.) and every other reputable source, the economic figure that most close tracks growth in demand for public services is growth in personal income. Personal income is also the only number which permits a true measure of tax burden, for obvious reasons.

It is not surprising that the entire premise of Tim’s tax revolt is built on lies, but it is disappointing that nobody has bothered to expose it sooner.

I don’t get many comments on my blog entries, but I sure do get a lot of email, often of the angry, misinformed persuasion. Many of these epistles have common themes, so I thought I’d share a few of my responses in the hope of encouraging a bit more originality. All names have been changed to protect the guilty.

To John, who demanded I reveal my Tribal connections, I replied that I was a Levite.

To Margaret I wrote that yes, I do indeed have the right to write the things I do, but that I appreciate her offer to visit me in prison.

To Adolph I apologized if he perceived an anti-German bias when I jokingly referred to the author of an anti-semitic email as “Klaus,” but hoped he would excuse me if I’m still a little sore over the fact that they did kill six million of my people.

To Steve I wrote to agree with him that I would not want the government telling me what I can or cannot do in the privacy of my own bedroom, although I could probably use an occasional reminder to flip my mattress.

And finally, to Kevin I thanked him for writing, but regretted that I was not limber enough to honor his request.

Please keep your comments coming.

By now you’ve likely seen the TV news clips or read in the papers that Tim Eyman delivered enough signatures to the Secretary of State to qualify I-892 (Slots for Tots) for the ballot. I was present for the festivities, so I thought I’d just pass along a few first hand observations.

Apparently, nothing says widespread public support like spending half a million dollars of gambling industry money on paid signature gatherers. But the most telling indication of I-892’s popularity was the fact that Tim showed up alone.

The image of Tim in his tailored suit, lugging boxes of signatures all on his lonely, was actually rather comical. You’d think for $3100 a week Tim could at least afford a $30 hand truck, if not a friend. When he was done, he wiped his brow exclaiming “that’s something you don’t want to do more than once a year,” a comment that doesn’t bode well for I-864 (and elicits a number of inappropriate jokes regarding his marital relations.)

Tim then stood before the cameras to briefly spout lies. He even brought a chart as a visual aid — or as it is technically known in the public relations business, more lies.

Finally, he took questions from the media — a rather one-sided exchange considering he wouldn’t actually give any answers in return — before sprouting horns and wings and flying back to his fortress of evil.

Just kidding about the horns.

Anyway, it really wasn’t much of a press conference, the most interesting part being what he omitted. You know, words like “slot machines” and “gambling” and “I’m a lying, thieving, blowhard.”

In the end, the battle over I-892 will be a battle over the truth. Tim is going to try to sell this as a tax cut initiative, whereas anybody with a shred of honesty is going to explain that it is about the most massive expansion of gambling in state history.

If the truth wins, I-892 loses.

As you’ll surely read in Monday’s paper, initiative entrepreneur Tim Eyman has collected over 230,000 signatures, more than enough to qualify I-892 (Slots for Tots) for the ballot.

That sucks.

Eyman extolls the virtues of “direct democracy” but there is nothing direct or democratic about Canadian and Nevadan gambling conglomerates spending half a million dollars to buy their way onto the WA ballot with lies.

I saw half a dozen I-892 signature gatherers this weekend, and they all used a variation on the same sales pitch: “Sign a petition to cut your property taxes.”

I-892 puts 18,255 slot machines into our neighborhoods, and if voters understand this in November, it will fail.

While Tim Eyman tries to characterize I-892 (Slots for Tots) as equal treatment for mom & pop bowling alleys [Bowling for dollars] its largest contributors are a handful of gambling conglomerates, mostly foreign and out-of-state corporations. Indeed, according to a recent article in the Seattle P-I, I-892’s biggest backer is the Great Canadian Gaming Corporation, which has sunk at least $62,500 into the effort through the end of May… possibly in violation of federal election laws.

But those aren’t the only laws of which Great Canadian may have run afoul. In addition to allegations of harassment, profit skimming, investment fraud, and prostitution, an investigative report by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation has uncovered accusations of loansharking in its B.C. casinos: “Loansharking alleged at B.C. casinos.” [Watch video clip]

The allegations came under oath in sworn depositions from two former long-time Great Canadian employees who were subpoenaed to testify as part of a lawsuit from a Texas corporation. Allegiance Capital claims that a joint venture with Great Canadian went sour due to profit skimming and prostitution onboard a Hong Kong based floating casino.

Proka Avramovic, one of the former employees subpoened to give evidence in Texas says the B.C. casinos banned certain loan sharks but allowed others to stay. “Obviously the company wanted to keep them there because they bring lots of money into the casino.”

With hundreds of paid signature gatherers hawking I-892 in the final week before the deadline, voters deserve to know what kind of company is paying them. This is a company accused of profit skimming and fraud, of promoting prostitution, and knowingly allowing loansharking in its casinos. It is a publicly traded corporation that hires a private investigator to harass the estranged wife of its chairman.

But most of all, this is a foreign corporation attempting to influence a Washington state election. And if they can’t be trusted to obey the laws in their home country, they certainly can’t be trusted to obey the laws in ours.

If I-892 were to be judged by the company it keeps, it would likely be convicted of several felonies.

One week before the July 2 deadline, our petition elves tell us that only one initiative campaign is confident they’ve collected the 200,000 signatures required: the Grange’s I-872 (top-two primary.)

Reports are that Tim Eyman’s I-892 (Slots for Tots) is struggling to gather enough signatures. Tim’s I-864 (cruelly vindictive tax cuts) however, is not… much in the same way the motionless rat outside my back door has ceased its struggle with my cat.

Tim’s latest email to supporters hints at the fragile state of both campaigns. After months of focusing his emails exclusively on I-864, Tim recently started speaking of both initiatives in the same breath, apparently laying the ground to claim a partial victory if only I-892 qualifies. (“We’re batting .500!”)

Today’s email doesn’t even mention the initiatives by name, characterizing them as a single effort.

More interesting is how he suddenly attempts to shift “credit” for these initiatives to his supporters: “We’re really counting on you…” “You can make this happen…”

“You are the leaders of this effort and you will ensure the success of our property tax reduction initiatives.”

The logical conclusion of which is, if the initiatives fail, it’s “your” fault.

Talk about a captain jumping a sinking ship. Yeah, nothing says “leadership” like denying you’re the leader once things go bad.

And one final comment. Tim also writes:

“The pace of donations and signatures has increased dramatically since the privacy shattering phone calls, deceptive radio ads, anonymous mailers,
and public employee unions’ thuggish tactics began a few weeks ago.”

Okay, forget the fact that he’s lying about donations increasing dramatically; as pointed out previously (“Free campaign advice to Tim Eyman“) they’ve been remarkably flat throughout the campaign.

And I don’t even want to get into the phone calls and radio campaign. (Norm Maleng informing voters that most signature gatherers are paid, is not exactly what I call “deceptive.”)

What offends me is his mention of “anonymous mailers.”

I’m on his email list, and there have been three mailings from opponents. One of them was from Jennifer McCausland, and the other two were from me! Each email came from valid email accounts, clearly identified the senders, and included contact information.

Tim can say a lot of things about me, but one thing I am not, is “anonymous.”

There are two things we can learn from Collin Levey’s column in today’s Seattle Times: “Don’t underestimate the Ralph Nader flutter effect.”

The first is that I was wrong to imply that The Wall Street Journal is the only thing Collin reads. She clearly has also read The Velveteen Rabbit. Sorry Collin.

The second thing we can learn is that her bosses at Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, Inc. are drooling over the prospect of a Ralph Nader candidacy.

Her thesis that anti-war Republicans (all several of them) are more likely to turn to Nader than anti-war Democrats is, well… nutty. And I suspect, disingenuous. As is her advice to Kerry:

The one thing Democrats haven’t done, and won’t do, is speak clearly enough on Iraq (and in favor of a rapid exit) to steal Nader’s thunder. That’s why Nader’s stronger-than-expected showing in the polls may be carried right through to the election.

Yeah, that’s exactly what Democrats should do, because we’re all stupid and heartless and irresponsible. Abdicating our nation’s obligation to clean up its own mess in Iraq is exactly the strategy for winning in November.

Thanks for the advice Collin.