Think of this as a compilation of the highlights from Rubio’s SOTU response….
The only flaw comes at the end. Isn’t that exit-smile bizarre?
(Via slog)
by Darryl — ,
by Darryl — ,
For once, I arrived at the Montlake Ale House with time to spare. We now have MSNBC on the tube, and are awaiting the end of the Tweety show and the start of SOTU coverage.
I am hoping some of my co-bloggers will show up and contribute to this thread (naturally, we didn’t plan anything in advance).
Have at it with all things SOTU in this comment thread.
5:59: Now that Obama is done with the final election of his life, I hope he uses this SOTU address to come clean about his BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
6:12: My prediction: At some point during the address, Justice Alito jumps up and yells, “You lie!.”
6:14: [N in Seattle]: It ought to be a good speech…today isn’t his anniversary….
6:16: “Tonight, thanks to the grit of the American people” [and no thanks whatsoever to the do-nothing House] “there has been much progress.”
6:19: There is a glistening in Boehner eyes. Obama will bring him to tears any minute now.
6:25: Biden seems to be working on his tax returns while listening to the adress.
6:27: [Carl] John Boehner and the Republicans refused to agree. Why do they hate the full faith and credit of the United States???
6:31: [Carl] The 4-freedoms speech was that greatest SOTU address ever, and it had only 3 or 4 applause breaks.
6:32: [N in Seattle] There would have been more if it had been on TeeVee.
6:38: [Darryl] Al Franken’s burden is that he cannot ever, ever smile in these types of occasions, lest people accuse him of being a comedian.
6:54: [Darryl] Did anyone notice the Boehner isn’t wearing a flag lapel pin? Why does he hate America?!?
7:13: [Darryl] Gawd…I hate the “anecdotes time” during these addresses.
7:28: Overheard at the Ale House: “When is the Republican response?” “Wait…didn’t we just hear the Republican address?”
7:30: Marco Rubio has the biggest ears I have ever seen on a human.
7:34: Somebody should clue Rubio in: When you repeat “Obama’s plan to grow the government” over and over again and throw out terms like “Obama’s obsession with raising taxes,” people recognize that you are engaging in political mud-slinging rather than presenting any serious point.
7:40: Water! I need WATER!
7:50: No luck finding the Rand Paul teabagger response on the tube. How tragic.
by Darryl — ,
This evening President Obama will deliver his State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress. So please join us at the Montlake Ale House for a SOTU-watching party at the Seattle Chapter of Drinking Liberally .
For this week only, we will meet at 5:30 pm (PDT). Obama’s address is scheduled to begin at 6:00 pm. Liveblogging will ensue.
For many people, this is also an election day, so deal with your ballot first. Make sure it will be postmarked today, or else find a drop box.
We meet every Tuesday at the Montlake Ale House, 2307 24th Avenue E. Our regular starting time is 8:00, but we will move that up this week for the SOTU address.
The Ale House will have TV coverage of the address, and reasonable audio levels. But bring your own radio and headphones (or ear buds) if you want to concentrate on the SOTU—there will be the normal high background noise of an active pub. Also, there is free WiFi available for streaming the audio. Ask your server for the WiFi password.
Can’t make it to Seattle tonight? Check out one of the other DL meetings over the next week. Tonight the Tri-Cities and Vancouver, WA chapters meet. On Wednesday, the Bellingham chapter meets. On Thursday Drinking Liberally Bremerton meets. Finally, next Monday, the Aberdeen, Yakima and Olympia chapters meet.
With over 200 chapters of Living Liberally, including fourteen in Washington state, four in Oregon, and two more in Idaho, chances are excellent there’s a chapter that meets near you.
by Darryl — ,
Stephen’s sister runs for congress.
Roy Zimmerman: I Want to Marry Like they Had in the Bible:
White House: West Wing Week.
Ann Telnaes: America’s dirty laundry.
Thom: Homophobic Scouts of America.
Stephen: America’s next President.
Greenman: Joe Romm on Climate, Obama, Keystone, and Consequences:
Skeeters:
Ed: GOP re-branding fail…Talk of trans-vaginal probes.
Young Turks: Dick Morris lies on CNN about lies on FAUX News.
The story of Kid President.
Drones:
Sam Seder: The real reason the Post Office is canceling Saturday deliveries.
Liberal Viewer: Karl Rove and does contraception contradict Capitalism?:
Maddow: Republicans try to hide their racist, bigoted, extremist base with ‘rebranding’ talk
Young Turks: O’Reilly lies about lying.
Lawyers, Guns, and Money:
Sam Seder: Marco Rubio on climate change…whatever.
Thom with some Good, Bad, and Very, Very Ugly.
The Ashley Judd Threat:
Jon laments America’s biggest losses.
Morris is out at FAUX News.
Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.
by Darryl — ,
The suggestion that Gov. Gregoire could be Obama’s next Secretary of the Interior has turned out to be wrong. Instead, another woman will get the job:
Sally Jewell, a retail executive and outdoor enthusiast, is President Barack Obama’s pick to oversee the national parks and vast energy reserves on public lands as Interior secretary, an administration official said on Wednesday. […]
Her private sector experience, most recently as chief executive of outdoor retailer REI, drew praise from conservationists and some industry groups…
And the Republican reaction to the nomination?
…Jewell’s nomination drew skepticism from some Republicans in Congress.
“I look forward to hearing about the qualifications Ms. Jewell has that make her a suitable candidate to run such an important agency, and how she plans to restore balance to the Interior Department,” said U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, the top Republican on the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Jewell has been a leader in land conservation in the Pacific Northwest, but she worked in the energy and finance sectors early in her career.
(By, “restor[ing] balance.” Murkowski means “increased drilling while opposing laws to cap greenhouse gases that are blamed for global warming.”)
Gregoire is not out of the running for two other cabinet positions, as was recently pointed out:
Gregoire, who has made energy issues a cornerstone of her gubernatorial tenure, is likely headed for one of three Cabinet-level jobs that are vacant now or will soon become vacant: Energy secretary, Interior secretary, or head of the Environmental Protection Agency. As a former head of Washington state’s Department of Ecology, Gregoire is steeped in experience in energy and environmental issues. Her enthusiastic support for renewable energy has won plaudits from environmentalists, but she’s also known for her ability to speak effectively about the realities of the fossil-fuel economy.
Either remaining position, EPA or energy secretary, seems like a good fit to Gregorie’s experience, strengths, and interests.
My money’s on energy secretary. Gregoire has a long history of doing battle with the Department of Energy over the Hanford clean-up. More recently, the battles have turned into happy agreement, adoring joint statements, and public praise.
That’s the tell.
by Darryl — ,
by Darryl — ,
by Darryl — ,
Please join us tonight for another lively evening of politics over a pint at the Seattle Chapter of Drinking Liberally. Today is the 10th anniversary of Colin Powell’s speech before the U.N. that carefully documented our reason for invading Iraq.
We meet every Tuesday at the Montlake Ale House, 2307 24th Avenue E. Starting time is 8:00pm. Some people show up earlier for Dinner.
Can’t make it to Seattle’s DL tonight? Check out one of the other DL meetings over the next week. Tonight the Tri-Cities chapter meets, and on Thursday Drinking Liberally Tacoma meets.
With over 200 chapters of Living Liberally, including fourteen in Washington state, four in Oregon, and two more in Idaho, chances are excellent there’s a chapter that meets near you.
by Darryl — ,
The Washington Post is updating its list of best state-based political blogs…something I didn’t know existed until I stumbled across the nominations post.
So if you want to nominate some blog as a “best state-based political blog”, please feel free to do so using the web form at the bottom of this page. Alternatively, click here to submit your nomination via Twitter (keep the hash tag in there).
by Darryl — ,
Thom: Is Gov. Rick Snyder (R-MI) lying about election rigging?
Obama speaks on immigration reform.
Hagel-ing:
SlateTV: Bloomberg on Joe Biden’s family jewels.
Ed: Latest GOP vote-rigging attempt hits a speed bump.
Stephen on Eric Erickson’s climate change denial (via Crooks and Liars).
Robert Reich: the hoax of “entitlement reform” (via Crooks and Liars).
Mark Fiore: Super Pacs and the Permanent Campaign.
Gun Lobbyists Don’t Kill Legislation, Legislators Kill Legislation:
Hillary says “goodbye”.
Sharpton: Colin Powell takes Bill O’Reilly to school over voter fraud.
White House: West Wing Week.
Sharpton: Obama makes progress on his 2nd term agenda.
Thom with more Good, Bad, and Very, Very Ugly.
Palin’ Around With Terrorists:
Bill Gates on education, health and Facebook.
Bill Maher with some new rules, Part I.
Bill Maher with some new rules, Part II.
Young Turks: Republican against voter fraud arrested for voter fraud.
Snohomish County plan to put police in schools.
Stephen learns that Gays are less stressed.
The G.O.P. Makeover Comb over:
Thom: Why does the pro-life movement align with the pro-death party?
Obama honors America’s top scientists and innovators of 2011.
Susie Sampson’s Tea Party Report: Immigration.
Thom: The Good, The Bad, and The Very, Very Ugly.
Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.
by Darryl — ,
Sen. Rodney Tom (faux D-48) is all about “bipartisan coalitions.” This lede suggests he has been quite an inspiration:
GOP and Democrats unite to fight Rodney Tom’s plan to erase parents’ ability to save for state college tuition through a state program. But the House effort carries a price tag.
I think Sen. Tom has a future filled with such coalitions….
by Darryl — ,
We’ve seen a run on vote rigging attempts in Republican controlled blue states. Republicans in Florida, Virginia, and Pennsylvania have flirted with, and have had rejected, plans to change their electoral vote allocation from a winner-take-all system to a congressional district allocation system. Republicans in Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin are expected to join the fun. (And probably be rejected.)
It makes sense for Republicans to selectively change the state laws in their favor, especially given their excellent job of gerrymandering congressional districts following the 2010 census. Yeah…the voters get fucked, but that never stopped a Republican from power-grabbing.
Changing a handfull of blue states to congressional district allocation, while maintaining the winner-take-all system in red states, would have given Mitt Romney the presidency. Even as the popular vote went to Obama.
With Sen. Rodney Tom’s Republican Senate majority, Washington state has taken it’s first step to becoming a blue state controlled by Republicans. Surprise, surprise…House Republicans are trying to join other Republican-controlled blue states in their Presidential election-rigging effort:
The proposal, House Bill 1091, would divvy up Washington’s electoral votes by results in each of the state’s 10 congressional districts, with the remaining two votes going to the statewide winner.
In 2012, that would have given Obama nine electoral votes from Washington while Romney would have taken three.
Supporters say that would be a fairer result for more conservative parts of the state that are constantly outvoted in statewide elections by the Seattle area.
In one sense, these whining Republicans are correct. Under some conditions, allocating electors by congressional district (with the two additional electors going to the state popular vote winner) is a fairer system than the winner-take-all system. Those conditions are:
Under those conditions, a universal congressional district allocation system is fairer because all but 100 of the 538 electoral votes are allocated by smaller, and thus more representative, voting blocks. That wold be fairer than the current system that has some bizarre artifacts:
The [current] system has the effect of making your vote count a lot more in “swing states” — states where the majority could conceivably vote for either candidate — than in other, more politically predictable states. It is a virtual certainty, for instance, that Georgia will vote for Mitt Romney, so an individual Georgian’s vote for Barack Obama doesn’t mean a lot — Georgia’s 16 electoral votes are going to be cast for Romney. Conversely, an individual voter’s choice for Romney in ultra-blue New York won’t stop that state’s 29 electoral votes from going to Obama.
This raises the questions, what do we mean by a “fairer” system? Here are some ideas:
Democrats remember how unfair it felt when George Bush lost the popular vote, yet became President. And Republicans would have collectively “gone postal” if Mitt Romney had won the popular vote but lost the presidential election.
What I am getting at is that the fairest system of all is to elect the President by popular vote. The system we have now, fails 8.7% of the time (four out of 46 elections where the national popular vote was known) by putting in office the loser of the popular vote.
We used to believe that the only way to change the system to elect the President by popular vote was to amend the Constitution. Now we know better. The National Popular Vote compact system achieves the same thing by letting states exercise their constitutional right to allocate electors as they wish:
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the entire United States. The bill preserves the Electoral College, while ensuring that every vote in every state will matter in every presidential election. The National Popular Vote law has been enacted by states possessing 132 electoral votes — 49% of the 270 electoral votes needed to activate it.
This works when a coalition of states is formed that controls 270 or more electoral votes. Then, by each member state’s law, the slate of presidential electors for the state is elected according to the result of the national popular vote. If the coalition does not control 270 votes, the states revert back to their old system (winner-take-all for most states).
There doesn’t seem to be a downside–unless you believe it’s okay for a candidate to lose the national popular vote and still be elected President. Since the compact makes no changes to the electoral college itself, no Constitutional amendment is necessary.
Back to the Washington state Republicans trying to rig the vote. The new bill, HB 1091, actually does two different things. It changes the way we allocate electors now. It also cancels Washington state’s participation in the interstate compact.
Of course! Why would we expect consistency from Republicans? They were never interested in making the presidential election as fair as possible. They’re only interested in advantaging Republicans.
So sad…Washington state Republicans have still have not shown any ability at true leadership. Fuck ’em. And fuck Rodney Tom for joining ’em.
by Darryl — ,
Please join us tonight for an evening of politics over a pint at the Seattle Chapter of Drinking Liberally.
We meet every Tuesday at the Montlake Ale House, 2307 24th Avenue E. Starting time is 8:00pm. Some people show up earlier for Dinner.
Can’t make it to Seattle’s DL tonight? Check out one of the other DL meetings over the next week. The Tri-Cities chapter also meets tonight. And on Monday, the Aberdeen, Yakima, South Bellevue and Olympia chapters meet.
With over 200 chapters of Living Liberally, including fourteen in Washington state, four in Oregon, and two more in Idaho, chances are excellent there’s a chapter that meets near you.
by Darryl — ,
Ed: Boehner blames Obama for GOP’s incompetence.
Guns and Stuff:
Thom with some more Good, Bad, and Very, Very Ugly.
Roy Zimmerman: Vote Republican, D.C. episode:
Hillary’s Day:
Sam Seder: What the fuck went on inside Michele Bachmann’s campaign???
Maddow: Is America a liberal country?
Re-Inauguration:
Gov. Jay Inslee makes some announcements.
Thom: The Good, The Bad, and The Very, Very Ugly.
G.O.P.’s War on Elections:
Sam Seder with another episode of Random Rush.
The “No warming in 16 years” myth.
Last week’s Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza can be found here.
by Darryl — ,
Welcome to the second term. Please join us for a post-inaugural celebration and assessment over a pint at the Seattle Chapter of Drinking Liberally.
We meet every Tuesday at the Montlake Ale House, 2307 24th Avenue E. Starting time is 8:00pm. Some people show up earlier for Dinner.
Can’t make it to Seattle tonight? Check out one of the other DL meetings over the next week. The Tri-Cities chapter also meets tonight. On Wednesday, the Burien and Bellingham chapters meets, And on Thursday the Woodinville chapter meets.
With 200 chapters of Living Liberally, including thirteen in Washington state, four in Oregon, and two more in Idaho, chances are excellent there’s a chapter that meets near you.