– Maybe BP should, instead of buying elections, use the money to make sure they don’t have another Gulf disaster.

– The Seattle City Council wants an amendment to the Constitution to overturn Citizen’s United.

– Happy filing week

– John Stossel is going to do an anti-union hit piece at some point. I guess it’s a scandal that unions operate in buildings.

– DNC, WTF?

– No, Bubba Carpenter. Mississippi has NOT stopped abortion. You have only stopped SAFE abortion.

– Seattle just awarded grants for job training for immigrant and refugee youth and families.

– Seattle’s bike score: not great

Nick makes a good point about public transit being improved by smart phones.

They’ve made it more fun! When I worked at Microsoft ten years ago, you would occasionally see some twenty-something male bus rider with a Game Boy Advance. But no self-respecting person who’s not a twenty-something male geek would walk around with something like that. The [sic] will, however, walk around with an iPhone or Galaxy Nexus, which they can use to read news, play games, do crossword puzzles, or get some actual work done.

It has long puzzled me why The Seattle Times (for example, but it’s not the only daily paper where it’s true) is so hostile to public transit. I mean I usually write for HA on my laptop (like I’m doing now) when I’m on public transit. But people are always on their phones and reading newspapers and books.

Maybe it’s different for me because of the stories of my grandfather riding into New York City from Connecticut for decades. He started the day with The New York Times, and ended each day with the evening paper. Nowadays, my uncle takes the same route. He reads the paper every morning, and writes letters to his elected officials most evenings. You can’t really do that if you’re in traffic.

– I liked reading about social columns.

– Newsweek continues its tradition of brilliant, well thought out covers.

– How dare Obama campaign?

– I’m still having trouble — you know morally — wrapping my head around the GOP position on the Violence Against Women Act (h/t).

– I can get behind Bill Murray as FDR.

– The Austerions

Someone brought this to market (h/t).

An unidentified entrepreneur admits he is trying to profit off Trayvon Martin’s death by selling gun range targets featuring the teen who’s death has sparked a nationwide controversy.

Although Martin’s face does not appear on the paper targets, they feature a hoodie with crosshairs aimed at the chest. A bag of Skittles is tucked in the pocket and a hand is holding a can resembling iced tea.

Seriously, fuck everything. Fuck this seller. Fuck the people who bought it, selling out in 2 days. 2 goddamn days. Fuck the people who think this is cute. Fuck the NRA and the gun nuts who brought us this stand your ground bullshit in the first place.

Fuck anyone who thinks we’re in a post racial country. No, racism still exists and it’s still ugly. Fuck the people who are so frightened of living in a multiracial society that they’re so terrified of children with Skittles. Fuck the people who think their gun rights trump the rights of a child to live.

Fuck it. There are no words.

They just installed a new light at the crosswalk at Yesler Way under the Viaduct. It seems to be a temporary thing until the Viaduct comes down.* So for now it’s a pain in the ass to cross. Previously, there was a crosswalk under the Viaduct, and then another one between the Viaduct and the waterfront.

The crosswalk under the Viaduct never had a light until now. This wouldn’t mean much if the lights were coordinated. But they are not. I’m sure it doesn’t actually add much time to the commute but it feels like forever.

This may be a bit of a problem as the days get nicer and more people who live and work in Pioneer Square want to walk to the waterfront. So hopefully it isn’t too long until they either get the Viaduct down or at least synch up the crosswalk lights.

And for the record, this isn’t an anti-viaduct post. I realize my preferred option (Surface/Transit/I-5) would have plenty of construction right now if it had been implemented.

[Read more…]

I really like this story in the LA Times about the opening of the Vashon Island branch of Puget Sound Cooperative Credit Union (h/t to Occupy Seattle’s Facebook).

The movement has spurred thousands of Americans to move their accounts out of mega-banks, but many have had to resort instead to big regional credit unions. Here, a group of hard-core Vashon activists, already seasoned in anticorporate campaigns, hit on the idea of merging with a small credit union to create a new branch on the island.

That office has managed, in its first year of operation, to enroll an astonishing 16% of the population and collect local deposits of almost $20 million.

“What surprised me about it was how rapidly the community embraced the credit union,” said Rob Harmon, a green economy pioneer who was part of the organizing committee. “We had wild dreams that in the first year $10 million would move. … And in the first year, $17.5 million moved. So we’re 70% above our wildest dreams.”

Last year, 1.3 million people across the U.S. joined credit unions, the lower-fee, not-for-profit alternative to commercial banks — double the rate from 2010. Once relegated to small offices at big companies, credit unions over the last 15 years have taken advantage of relaxed federal regulations to expand their membership.

…

Vashon organizers say the key to their success — a template they hope to share with other communities — was the decision to abandon the capital-intensive process of chartering their own credit union. Instead, they joined a small, existing credit union willing to cede substantial control in exchange for new members and deposits.

Harmon and Moyer were talking one day in 2009 about how to create a coal-free zone on the island. They needed to help people weatherize their homes, but none of the three Wall Street banks on the island wanted to make those kinds of loans except as home equity loans.

With the news of JP Morgan Chase losing $2 Billion in a way that shows they haven’t learned thing one, it’s quite timely.

Of course Obama has been planning his fundraiser for quite a while now. So there’s certainly a possibility that it’s just a coincidence that Washington was the first state he visited after announcing his support for marriage equality. Still, he could have made his announcement at any time. And Biden’s trial balloon came the weekend before the trip. So, maybe they looked at the calendar and decided Obama is going to be in Washington, so let’s make it happen.

It certainly seems to me that Washington is the right choice of venue for that. Of course there’s a good chance, depending on the signature gathering, that we’ll have this question on the ballot. Obama coming here probably spread the news a little more among people who like him that he thinks marriage equality is something worth pushing. Of course, this was big news anyway, but it probably got to a few more low information voters today.

That’s not to say his speech was all this one issue. As Paul Constant says:

What President Obama offered was basically his standard stump-speech. This doesn’t mean he ignored LGBT issues—when he listed his accomplishments, DADT repeal was high on the list; he said that no American, “black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled” should be discriminated against; and he did state that nobody should be denied rights because of who they love. (That mention of the freedom to love came early in the speech, and it got a raucous round of applause.) But marriage equality was just one of a series of issues he set out to contrast himself with Mitt Romney, who he referred to frequently by name. Romney, he said, “is a patriotic American,” and he congratulated him for the “success he’s had as the head of a large financial firm,” which earned derisive laughter from the crowd.

His was a fundraiser for his campaign, not a marriage equality rally. And there are lots of issues where he has to keep pushing. Still, I’m glad he was here.

– Publicola calls it quits.

– Who would have guessed Jonah Goldberg isn’t the most honest person ever?

– One of the NY GOP Senators who voted for marriage equality isn’t going to run for reelection because of a tough primary challenge.

– Sensible Washington is hoping people will show up in Kent to protect access to collective gardens.

– I’m pleasantly surprised that McKenna losing a talking point is gaining traction from Obama’s support of marriage equality.

– Even in the war on women, this is outlandish.

– Start worrying about children

– Bike Fashion Show

Now that Obama supports gay marriage, it will presumably be much easier to get a marriage equality plank into the platform. Still, I haven’t seen him support plank in the national platform (I haven’t seen one way or the other, but I’ve only done a cursory Google search). So hopefully he lends his support to it, and it’s not a fight. But for now, I’m still going to push people who support that plank at the next levels.

I generally think it makes sense for Joni Balter to move to news. But the highlighted bit is strange.

In an email, Balter told PubliCola that her new title will be assistant political editor. “I have long wanted to try some editing,” Balter says. “I am taking the lead on the Politics Northwest blog, trying to give it a bigger presence on the site and make it a must read.”

More political reporting on the Politics Northwest blog sounds good. The best model would be Postman, but The Tacoma News Tribune’s political blog is pretty good, and has had more longevity than Postman. I hope she can pull it off, and as I’ve said, all in all, Balter moving to news is probably the right move for the paper, and hopefully for her.

Still, does Joni Balter not realize she has access to a blog now? She could have made some effort to make the Ed Cetera blog a must read. I’m sure the paper would have loved her to break some stories on that blog, instead of doing nothing with it for a while, and then giving it to an intern. And it seems that a breaking news blog would be more work than an opinion blog. Maybe it’s more different than I realize, but if the past is prologue, it’s not a good sign.

– Mother’s Day (week) actions for Macy’s workers.

– You probably wouldn’t want your dog off leash in this dog park.

– Oh, it looks like there’s a mayor’s race in Portland

– I’m glad the Obama administration is putting out feelers (h/t) on marriage equality, but it’s time to just make it happen.

– Here’s hoping Neil Sinhababu’s take on the Greek elections is right.

– How much latitude should artists have when copying photographs?

I haven’t been making fun of The Seattle Times’ Ed Cetera blog recently. And point of fact, their intern is doing a pretty good job providing content.

But fortunately, there’s still their occasional nonsense where Bruce Ramsey and Lynne Varner argue usually over some detail on a non-issue where they start out meeting each other 90% of the way. Surprisingly, this time they actually talked about a real issue: The police response to the May Day vandalism. Bruce Ramsey starts it off thus: “I’m big on individual rights, but here is where I draw a line.”

Sure. We all have our lines. So it’s fair to say where they are. But I feel like Bruce Ramsey is regularly saying where we should curtail our individual rights and saying he usually supports individual rights as opposed to this time. But it seems to me, he could focus more on the rights he wants to expand.

Now, I’m sure he can link to pieces about lower taxes and claim that’s an individual’s right to not pay whatever tax the column is about. But that’s not the same. I’m sure he can link to pieces where he talks about property rights, and that’s closer but still not the same; the main regulations are downstream problems and other externalities, and anyway, a lot of people don’t own property. I’m sure he can link to pieces where he has defended corporate rights when they’ve been unpopular, but that’s not anything like individual rights.

Look, I know there are drug war things where he’s been fine. But it seems he cares less about individual rights than the average liberal. But he talks about how he’s for individual rights more than just about anyone. And you’d think someone like that would go out of their way to write about the individual rights they want to expand more.

– May Day

– A road to disaster for Europe.

-Darryl linked to people who made fun of The Heartland Institute’s godawful billboards in the Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza, but here’s another link making fun of it, now mostly with the written word.

– I don’t know if other people were aware of We are the 1 in 3, but I just came across it (h/t).

– The French elected a new President.

– Cape Disappointment and Useless Bay make this list of most depressing place names.

Dwight Pelz has pulled his support for the the marriage equality plank of the federal platform. He claims the problem is that this is an effort to embarrass Obama.

“I was unhappy to see them throw up some press release out there making it like this insurrection within the party,” Pelz says. “I wasn’t happy with them using my name,” he says, explaining that he didn’t like their tactics. “I didn’t realize it was part of a strategy to start a fight within the party and embarrass the President.”

“Frankly, I felt sandbagged.”

I appreciate that Pelz wants to support President Obama more than he cares about any particular plank in the platform. But if Obama can’t support a marriage equality plank, he deserves to be embarrassed. He’s on the wrong side of history and the wrong side of basic human decency.*

Furthermore, the Washington State Democratic platform will support marriage equality because most Washington State Democrats support marriage equality. Most of the caucus in the last session of the legislature supported marriage equality. We need a chair who will support for those values at the national level. I realize that party activists have the freedom to get ahead of elected officials on these sorts of issues, I just hope Pelz remembers that he’s an activist, not an elected official, now.

[Read more…]

I hate to be cynical about this piece in The Columbian. Yes, kids should learn math. There is interesting stuff there. It opens up worlds later on. I wish I had studied harder as a kid. But math and science will never be cool.

In Our View: Science & Math Are Cool

In my view: Cool? I hope there’s some evidence to back that up instead of a HEYKIDS!!!!!! type intro.

Many middle-school students fear science and math as much as cooties and wedgies. Neither subject is ranked on their cool-things-at-school list. And later, in high school, those preconceived notions improperly guide their course selections and career choices.However, those stereotypes are fading, thanks in part to Washington STEM, a nonprofit that is celebrating its first anniversary this week. For the purpose of this editorial, the key letters in the STEM acronym are the first and the last. “Science” and “math” form the foundation — especially in middle school — for meaningful high-school diplomas, attractive résumés for college applicants and, ultimately, lucrative careers. First, though, we have to convince kids to stop hating on science and math.

Cooties? Are middle schoolers 6? For goodness sake. Look, kids should learn hard sciences. They should learn them for the somewhat important things in the paragraph, and more importantly they should also learn them for their own sake. But teachers, journalists, and other authority figures are never going to be cool. They should recognize that, and focus on why these programs actually matter.

And the rest of the article is praise for the program mostly couched, bizarrely as this sounds, as statements of praise for the program as the program. I don’t know enough about it, but I’m happy to spend money on the hard sciences. But it’s a strange intro and last line.

So spread the word: Science and math are cool. Even journalists think so.

No, I’m going to spread the word that math and science are important, and you’ll be glad you took them. But sorry, they still aren’t cool.