Goldy

I was chatting with a long-time local politico over the weekend, bitching about the P-I endorsement of Reichert, and the old-timer sarcastically responded “Big deal.”  Both the Times and P-I endorsements were “soft,” and besides, newspapers “almost always endorse the incumbent.”

Huh.  It wasn’t the first time I’d heard that little gem of conventional wisdom, and anecdotally it appeared to be true, but I thought I’d start compiling a spreadsheet of newspaper endorsements this season to see how strongly that trend holds up.  So far I’ve compiled results from the Times, the P-I and the Olympian, for all non-open, statewide, congressional, and legislative endorsements… and so far the incumbents are leading by a margin of 41 to 1, the lone exception being the P-I’s endorsement of Democratic challenger Peter Goldmark in the race for Commissioner of Public Lands.

I plan on adding at least the Everett Herald, the Tacoma News Tribune, the Columbian, and the Spokane Spokesman-Review to my spreadsheet, and no doubt the percentages will narrow some when the Times and other conservative ed boards inevitably endorse Dino Rossi, but I’d say the results thus far are statistically significant.

And there are folks in our local media who accuse me of lacking sufficient independence.

It’s bullshit of course, but the Seattle Times has an online poll in WA-08, and from the current lopsided results it is clear that the other side is freeping it, so why not have a crack at that ourselves?  Surely there are enough readers here at HA to push the numbers the other way?

In a Palinesque maneuver, Dino Rossi is seeking to block subpoenas in the unfolding Buildergate scandal:

Lawyers for Republican candidate for governor Dino Rossi plan to file papers Monday for a court case in Seattle.

They are trying to prevent him from having to testify in a lawsuit challenging campaign spending by the Building Industry Association of Washington.

Rossi’s campaign says the lawsuit is politically motivated.

Politically motivated?  Well, yeah, maybe.  But what does that matter?  Either there is enough evidence to proceed or there isn’t?  The question is, if Rossi really is innocent of illegal campaign coordination he should have nothing to hide.  So why avoid the deposition?

Incumbent Lt. Governor Brad Owen and State Auditor Brian Sonntag.  I won’t necessarily be voting for their Republican opponents, but I will definitely not cast my ballot for these two “Democrats” this November.

I’ve never been much impressed by Owen, but Sonntag, well, I’ve grown pretty damn disillusioned with his confrontational, punitive, and thus counterproductive use of performance audits these past couple years. Rather than promoting efficiencies in government, Sonntag’s performance audits have only served to enable and embolden anti-transit, anti-tax, anti-government activists.  If he audited himself to see what kind of return taxpayers have gotten for their performance audit dollars, his office wouldn’t look so good.

Yeah Sarah, as president, John McCain would indeed “end… the abuse of power.”  In Alaska.

Princeton professor and New York Times opinion columnist Paul Krugman—the economist conservatives love to hate—has won the Nobel Prize in Economics.

And it couldn’t happen at a better time.  With the economic dogma of the Republican Party in the toilet (along with the bubble economy it helped create), is there anybody on the right who has the intellectual cred to go up against Krugman?  I don’t think so.

Speaking of editorial endorsements, the Olympian today describes the governor’s race as a contest between “An efficient policy wonk running against a slick carnival hawker.”  So guess which candidate they endorse?

If you’ve noticed an absence of substantive posting from me over the past couple days, it’s not from a lack of writing.  In fact, I’ve written a couple of rants, several thousand words total, responding to the editorial endorsements of Dave Reichert by the both the Seattle Times, and even more disappointingly, the Seattle P-I.

It was cathartic.  It felt good.  But, well, sometimes one can be too honest, and at this point, really, what’s the point?  So I’ll just keep my least constructive comments to myself.

But I’m sitting here watching the debate between Darcy Burner and Reichert on KCTS-9, a debate in which Darcy is clearly kicking the incumbent’s ass, and so I just can’t let this all pass by without at least one blunt critique, and that is that both paper’s editorial boards appear to have knowingly endorsed the least intelligent, least knowledgeable, and least capable candidate.  As my 11-year-old daughter just aptly observed, Reichert “sounds like a little kid giving a report that he didn’t practice on, and knows nothing about.”

Or perhaps I give the editorial boards too much credit?

You see, I have always started from the basic assumption that the vast majority of voters would prefer elected leaders who are at least as smart and capable as they are.  These are our leaders after all, and we entrust in them huge responsibilities.  I accept that there are multiple intelligences, and that being book-smart is not a qualification on its own, but generally, it seems like a good idea to populate Congress with our best and our brightest.

And the fact is, Dave Reichert is, well, average.  There’s no getting around that.  He’s not well educated, he’s not well informed, and he has few if any accomplishments to show for his four years in the House.  Indeed, neither the Times nor the P-I argue that Reichert is exceptional in any way, instead, they argue, he is, well, good enough.

So if Reichert is good enough for our two dailies, what does that say about the editorial writers themselves?

Unlike me, do these editorialists simply not mind being represented by somebody who is less capable than they are?  Or does my assumption hold true, and are these editorialists simply as mediocre as Reichert?  Do they accept Reichert as good enough because they really do find him to be an intellectual equal?

I know I may come off as sounding a little elitist, but Congress is a very elite organization, and it just seems that our region would be best served by selecting the very best representatives we can find.  And Reichert simply is not that.

He is, however, the incumbent, and what we have seen from both papers is little more than a defense of incumbency, a circular logic that argues that Reichert’s experience in Congress, however unremarkable, is the singular qualification that makes him a better choice than Darcy.  And if that is the curious logic by which our region’s opinion leaders determine their endorsements, then my original assumption is left unchallenged.

So when Sarah Palin talks about being a “reformer,” is she talking about this?

A legislative committee investigating Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has found she unlawfully abused her authority in firing the state’s public safety commissioner. The investigative report concludes that a family grudge wasn’t the sole reason for firing Public Safety Commissioner Walter Monegan but says it likely was a contributing factor.

Darcy Burner and Dave Reichert debated again this afternoon, and from what I’m hearing, she kicked his ass.  Watch for yourself tonight at 7PM, on KCTS Channel 9.

After a wild ride in which it opened with a 700 point slide, the Dow see-sawed back and forth, eventually closing down only 128 points.  So rather than redoing yesterday’s chart to reflect the decrease in the Bush-era return from -19% to -20%, I thought I’d take a stab at charting the NASDAQ, which actually closed slightly up today.

Let’s hear it for our “CEO President.”

When the Building Industry Association of Washington (BIAW) spends hundreds of thousands of dollars attacking Gov. Chris Gregoire for spending too little on foster care children, you just know there’s something suspicious about the ad… suspicions easily confirmed with a modicum of factchecking.

It turns out that Mary Radcliffe, the “child advocate” at the center of the ad, is a long-time Republican Party activist, the former co-chair of the anti-affirmative action Initiative 200, and a WA delegate to the 2000 Republican National Convention, handpicked by the Bush campaign to add some color to the proceedings.  Her abuse of the title “Court Appointed Special Advocate” for political purposes has repeatedly drawn legal action from the the Washington’s Court Appointed Special Advocates for Children (CASA), and, not surprising, the charges made in the ad have already been debunked as total lies.

But that hasn’t stopped the BIAW from spending its illegal funds to attack one of Gov. Gregoire’s strengths, her unmatched advocacy on behalf of children, and it hasn’t prompted the amen editorialists at the Seattle Times from expressing their moral outrage, despite their patently ridiculous call on Gov. Gregoire to pull a factual accurate ad about embryonic stem cell research, because in their view “the issue is not real.”

Watch the video for all the details.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down another 679 points today, closing at 8,579, it’s lowest point in over five years.  With a return of negative 19%, President Bush has now surpassed Richard Nixon for the honor claiming the worst performing market this side of Herbert Hoover.

By comparison, the Dow first broke the 8,500 mark way back in June of 1998, under President Bill Clinton.