Sen. Pam Roach has an anus problem. Last night as the Senate passed bill 5297 that requires medically and scientifically accurate sexual health education, Sen. Roach clenched her…her…fists, and proclaimed:
What does the word anus have to do with sex ed when we’re talking to fourth graders? No parent wants their child to be talking about sex and anuses.
Sen. Roach was outraged by instructional materials for a 4th-6th grade curriculum she found on the King County website that includes the word “anus.” (Sen. Roach has a point—hearing your kid talk about sex and anuses is probably not high on the list of parental moments to savor. But it helps if your kid at least uses scientifically accurate terminology….)
Roach’s problem is that she, apparently, doesn’t understand the difference between sexual health education and “talking about sex.” Apparently, there is no room in her world view for an objective discussion of other anatomical structures as part of an education in reproductive anatomy. Might this attitude come from a belief that sex is only for procreation?
Here is a figure from the King County website that is part of a typical lesson in the 4th-6th grade curriculum that includes “talking about sex and anuses.”
Clearly, there is a leftist agenda at play here–I mean sneaking the bladder, urethra, and anus into the same diagram as the female reproductive system is a pernicious attempt to promote promiscuity and homosexuality (while giving in to the terrorists). The agenda could only have been more blatant by including the G-spot….
I think it’s revealing that Pam Roach found “anus” objectionable in the anatomy lesson, but not “bladder”—revealing about the state of Pam Roach’s own anal sphincter. And I think we can all agree that thinking about Pam Roach’s sphincter is inappropriate at any age.
UPDATE:
Sen. Roach may have a point. From what I understand about trends in teen sex, the diagram emphasizes the wrong end of the alimentary canal. [–Goldy]
Well, you know what that means, the more those God fearing hypocrites on the right object and deny, the more they are participants in what they are objecting to.
Therefore, Pam Roach’s public proclamation is that she’s a real anal whore. She’s probably into double anal penetration and anal fisting.
For all you yum-yums who don’t know how to please your women, and you know who you are, the Beatles had it right; pay attention to #9, #9 numm-ber 9.
Puddybud:
Remember when I told you I’m part “black” too? You know from my belt buckle to mid thigh.
Check out #7, bro. Been there done that.
4 posts 100% by GBS!
Sen. Roach has a valid concnern. Any bill “that requires medically and scientifically accurate sexual health education” should have illustrations which properly depict the various anatomical parts of a human body. As anyone can clearly see, there’s just no cranium jammed into that anus. Therefore, it does not accurately describe the anatomy of any right-winger.
This illustrates one of the strongest arguments against intelligent design – no Engineer in his (or her) right mind would have designed a biological system that combined reproduction and waste removal. Too messy and prone to failure.
The agenda could only have been more blatant by including the G-spot…
“G” spot – isn’t that # 9 on that diagram?!?
*wink*
Darryl, that is the best headline I’ve read in ages. Thanks!
:D
p.s. In all sincerity re: the anus. Senator Pam should be reminded that 35-40% of all sexually active HETEROsexuals under age 45 have engaged in anal sex. The CDC says so .
CDC link. let me try again:
http://nymag.com/nightlife/mating/25988/index.html
That pic is so hawt! I hope your ISP doesn’t pull the plug for distributing porn.
My actual thought on the situation is this: would Roach prefer it if a generation of young boys never learned the difference between the anus and vagina?
@ 7:
Uhhh, no. That’s not the G spot.
With a screen name like “Karen” I would’ve guessed you knew better.
The more I think about it, the more I see the need for Sex Ed in schools and places of worship. It would relieve a lot of pent up tension in this world.
Sheeeeez.
I checked out the pdf, and there is a mistake. It shows the male organ bending to its owner’s right. Since most of us are right-handed and put it away with the right hand, shouldn’t it be bending to the left?
@ 12:
Which PDF are you talking about?
Message for Pam – yes, honey, the homos are after Roach family anus, but not yours yours.
That son is kinda cute….. did you give him the homosexual danger talk yet?
Aside from the middle schools, every adult I know needs some more sex education. More, indeeed.
GOOD RADIO TOPIC GOLDY
It’s not hard to understand why Roach finds sex repulsive — when you consider what face she sees in the mirror every mornng.
@6 Yeah. Far too often, Republican parents flush the baby and keep the turd.
Humans don’t know a damn thing about reproduction. http://www.funpic.hu/en.picvie.....d&p=7
If anyone would know something about assholes, it’s that cunt Roach.
There’s a reason every 4th grader’s favorite planet is Uranus. It has the funniest name.
Roger Rabbit says:
While I agree Roach is being silly here, I can’t find any reference in the article where she said sex was “repulsive”. Are you just making stuff up again?
Just in case you missed it “Mr. Grammar and Spelling Police”, you misspelled “morning”.
18 Please! Using that word to refer to Pam is an even greater insult to self-respecting female genitalia than using it in connection with Anne Coulter.
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002712.php
Oops. There goes Rove tactics page 1. Can’t blame the Dems anymore. Now a Publican agrees that the AG should go. How many Bush regime appointees can we send to jail in the next 18 months or so?
@19 I made a typo. So fucking what??! Try typing with rabbit paws sometime.
Next thing you know, she will be putting underwear on all statues in Olympia to cover the “crotch” area…..
Just like Ashcroft covered…….
@21 Ain’t it grand fun to watch Republicans eat Republicans?
@14
Considering that Pam Roach’s son is a felon, I presume that she believes that prison is a better place to learn about such topics.
Ah yes, my little chickadees! That diagram proves God has a sense of humor!
Roger Rabbit says:
(expletive deleted)
Since grammar and spelling are so important to you that wingnuts are “idiots” if they can’t spell, I would think you’d take extra care not to make typos. Then again, in your world people don’t have to live by their own standards.
http://www.horsesass.org/?p=2651
@14
Considering that Pam Roach’s son was imprisoned for drug trafficking, I think it’s too late.
Speaking of not having to live by your own standards….
When President Clinton was accused of lying, the righties acted as if the very foundation of our republic was at stake and that lying under oath was the most serious offense known to man.
Now that Publican Bush Regime member Libby is convicted, lying under oath is no big deal.
Oh yes, President Clinton lied about sex and Libby lied in an attempt to out a CIA agent. If anything, REAL patriots on the right would be/should be calling for Libby’s head. Of course, we all know there are no patriots on the right. Just traitors and cowards.
The cover of “Vanity Fair” is where I always go to see who’s a covert CIA agent.
@ 29:
Really???? Is that where you go?
When Valorie Plame was on that cover of Vanity Fair did it mention she was a covert CIA operative?
Just axin’.
Maybe it would be more appropriate to put her picture with the label anus crying hypocrit who lies, steals and cheats.
re 29: Just keep an eye on Robert Novak’s column.
You’ll find them there AFTER they’ve been outed by the administration: The Vanity Fair cover was well after Robert Novak’s article.
But don’t let facts get in the way of a good ten minute hate.
Hey, does Pam like to take it in the ass, or is she just jealous of Anne Coulter? Nah, Pam was just drunk again and dreaming about how fine a good ream feels.
Mormons are supposed to have 6 children. Somebody out there might correct me, but I believe Pam Roach fell short of that ecclesiastical edict. Is it because she doesn’t like sex? Anyone who has met her (I have) would suggest that she’s quite masculine. So, perhaps, she just ain’t fond of the kind of sex likely to produce offspring (you know, the kind that involves men).
33
Jenna, baby, might you be headed out West anytime soon?
Goldy you speak of anatomy and that should be taught correctly.
Should elementary schools be teaching anal sex? Will they teach about how dangerous it is and all the physical aliments including death that can come from it? Good. should they be teaching 10 year olds….I don’t think so. If you as a parent want to that is great.
I believe in teaching about contraceptives and abstinance. You need to let them know what options are out there if you decide to have sex and what the %’s are that they will fail and thus the risk of STD’s or pregnancy. Of course abstinance is the only 100% of not getting and STD or pregnant. Though I know at 14 I was tired of abstinance and I had been told by my father about using a condom if I ever was going to have sex and that it wasn’t 100% effective and thus was risking my future. The school also had taught about what the parts are and about contraceptives. That was fine….in 7th grade.
What part of medically and scientifically accurate sexual health education isn’t going on? Are schools saying a penis is on their back? That statement is so full of shit.
If the goal is to teach that sex is fine and if you do it be protected, then say that.
26 “So f*cking what??!” … “(expletive deleted)”
Bwahawhawhaw hahaha … if THAT’S how you delete expletives, I’m not gonna let MY kids read YOUR expletive-deleteds!!!
HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
Even at pretending to be prudes, these guys are fakes.
I just love the right wing sleazebags trying to trash heroes like the Wilsons, and support lying traitors like Cheney, and Libby.
Hey cons, how does it feel to be an enemy of the People of the United States?
“A true American hero”
Joseph Wilson stood up to Saddam — then to the Bush administration. The man who exposed the president’s bogus uranium claim talks about why he spoke out and the White House’s ugly “revenge” against him and his wife.
– – – – – – – – – – – –
By David Talbot
Oct. 10, 2003 | In 1991, President George Bush introduced Joseph Wilson to his war Cabinet, calling the veteran diplomat “a true American hero.”
——————
So now you gonna trash Bush Sr. cons?
What should be done about the lying traitors in the White House anyway?
Comments accepted…..
@29 I know which one you go to for dates. http://tinyurl.com/2t4uk3
http://talk.rgj.com/viewtopic.php?t=16914
THE REAL STORY OF SCOOTER LIBBY:
“It all started on January 2, 2001 with a robbery at the Niger Embassy in Italy. From Vanity Fair (July 2006) “little of value was missing—a wristwatch, perfume, worthless documents, embassy stationery, and some official stamps bearing the seal of the Republic of Niger”.
A few months later and after a visit from Bush’s friend Italy’s PM Berlusconi (before 9/11/2001), ‘intelligence agencies began reporting that Saddam Hussein had sought yellowcake—a concentrated form of uranium which, if enriched, can be used in nuclear weapons—from Niger”.
The CIA informed George W. Bush that the documents were forgeries. But Bush did not accept that conclusion.”
Libertarian: How is this a “free market”?
Q- What role is the International Monetary Fund playing in restarting Iraq’s oil industry?
A- The IMF is helping to push through
a new law that would determine how the
country’s oil industry is organized and who
would profit from it.
Roger Rabbit says:
I don’t care what you let your kids read.
I’d rather be a falsely considered a fake prude (I’m neither, BTW), than someone that can’t back up their arguments. You’ve failed to provide any facts to back up the following statements:
Roger Rabbit says:
So where exactly did Roach say that sex was “replusive”?
http://www.horsesass.org/?p=2651
Roger Rabbit says:
Care to back this up with a wager? Or are you afraid? Or do you know you are wrong and can’t bring yourself to admit it?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17515450/
The Bush regime gets bitch-slapped AGAIN. Man it sucks to be a right wing turd.
That cunt Ann Coultergiest continues to ride the heat for being a gay homophobe….
http://www.crooksandliars.com/.....s-coulter/
You righties certainly have some interesting leaders. NOT!
Roger Rabbit says:
@19 I made a typo. So fucking what??! Try typing with rabbit paws sometime.
03/08/2007 at 2:36 pm
Yep! Roger and the brain of one also.
I’ve serious in the asking of this question, though to some it may appear partisan or rhetorical.
Many Republicans and those on the ideological Right are calling for the presidential pardon of Scooter Libby, who was just convicted of 4 counts of perjury for lying to the FBI and to a grand jury, regarding a leak of Valerie Plame’s identity to the press…
Can someone explain to me what the difference is between Clinton being convicted of perjury for lying under oath about consensual oral sex, and Libby lying about the revealing the identity of a person who for 20 years had served our nation by clandestinely seeking out information of other nations’ nuclear plans and arsenals?
Why does it seem ideologically OK to destroy 20 years of intelligence gathering and a person’s reputation and career, but not to convict for lying about a personal pecadillo and a character flaw?
Why was it a High Crime for Clinton and not, in the political arena, Treason for Libby?
Was it really 4 counts or just one?
Valerie Plame, did she really leave her office or did someone else went into harms way?,br>
39
False. The British and a lot of people in the CIA still stand behind the Niger “yellow cake” report. Your just repeating democrat propaganda. You dems get nothing right.
The distributor of conservative pundit Ann Coulter’s column, Universal Press Syndicate, has no plans to drop her column despite the flap she created with her recent “faggot” comment.
Coulter used the gay slur in reference to Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards during a March 2 speech at the American Conservative Union’s Political Action Conference.
So far three newspapers that carried her column have announced that they would stop running it, and the gay rights group Human Rights Campaign has launched a letter-writing effort demanding that Universal stop distributing the column.
But in a statement, Universal’s president and editor Lee Salem said: “The contracts with the many writers and cartoonists we represent call for specific products and we have no legal interest in what they may do or say outside of that relationship.
In the case of Ann Coulter (and others across the political spectrum whom readers have urged us to drop), she is not an employee and we have no legal power to ‘fire’ her, though, of course, any of her subscribing newspapers can drop her column at any time.
Now is Ann really gay homophobe or goating the FAR FAR left into hissy fit?
“Truth_Teller says:
This illustrates one of the strongest arguments against intelligent design – no Engineer in his (or her) right mind would have designed a biological system that combined reproduction and waste removal. Too messy and prone to failure.”
You sound like a creature of public schooling. Have you never heard of a cloaca?
Clinton lied about a BJ. Scooter lied about telling the truth. No wonder liberals are mad.
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama got more than an education when he attended Harvard Law School in the late 1980s. He also got a healthy stack of parking tickets, most of which he never paid.
The Illinois Senator shelled out $375 in January – two weeks before he officially launched his presidential campaign – to finally pay for 15 outstanding parking tickets and their associated late fees.
Roger did you pay your parking tickets?
World oil demand growth, led by China and the United States, will nearly double in 2007, putting pressure on OPEC producers to boost production later this year, a Reuters poll found on Thursday.
“OPEC is going to have to boost output in the second half of the year since non-OPEC supply growth will be unable to meet global demand,” said Mike Wittner, analyst at investment bank Calyon.
Folks in Seattle will start riding bicycles to stop global warming and to save money to pay for their utility bills.
No wonder liberals are mad.
NOPE DOOFUS WE’RE RELIEVED THAT THE RIGHT-WING LIARS AND THIEVES YOU WORSHIP ARE FINALLY GETTING A LITTLE OF WHAT’S COMING TO THEM.
@43 Roger Rabbit says:
I’ll bet there’s at least 20 Republicans tooling around on private jets for every “rich liberal.”
03/08/2007 at 2:28 pm
Care to back this up with a wager? Or are you afraid? Or do you know you are wrong and can’t bring yourself to admit it?
Given the wingnut track record of paying bets, I have a policy of requiring the money to be put in escrow first. Roger Rabbit says:
I’ll bet there’s at least 20 Republicans tooling around on private jets for every “rich liberal.”
03/08/2007 at 2:28 pm
Care to back this up with a wager? Or are you afraid? Or do you know you are wrong and can’t bring yourself to admit it?
First of all, given the wingnut track record on paying bets, I require cash in escrow for all wagers. Knowing what the character of Republicans, I don’t offer credit.
Now, as for the ownership of private jets, most are owned by fractional or leasing companies, or corporate flight departments; relatively few belong to HNWI’s (high net worth individuals). Most corporate CEOs are Republicans, and so are most HNWI’s, with the possible exception of entertainment industry figures. Now, what was it you were blowing out of your ass?
The British and a lot of people in the CIA still stand behind the Niger “yellow cake” report.
YEP, RIGHT-WING LIARS AND IDIOTS.
YEP DOOFUS THE “EVIDENCE” FOR THAT REPORT WAS FORGED DOCUMENTS THAT HAD THE SIGNATURE OF GUY WHO WAS DEAD FOR TWO YEARS BEFORE THE DOCS WERE DATED!
THE SAME DOCUMENTS THAT WERE DEBUNKED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND CIA TWICE.
BE PROUD DOOFUS. YOUR ABILITY TO SWALLOW RIGHT WING BULLSHIT IS UNSURPASSED BY ANY WINGNUT HERE. EVEN PUDDYBUD! THAT SAYS A HELL OF A LOT!!
@46 Did I ever say I didn’t have a rabbit brain? When did I ever claim to think like you humans? Thank God I’m a rabbit and not a human! All I do is fuck cute female bunnies to MAKE MORE BUNNIES. You guys fuck the whole planet, and everyone in it.
I guess klake has a superiority complex or something.
re 47: The lying about sex was a lie about something extraneous that had nothing to do with what the grand jury was investigating.
Libby’s lies went right to the heart of what the FBI and grand jury were investigating.
Setting Clinton up this way was just a trap (after spending $110,000,000 of our tax money on K.Starr’s witch hunt).
47 Geez, klake, did you fall off a ladder and land on your head? Don’t you realize you could be excommunicated from the GOP for that?
48 5 counts, convicted of 4, acquitted of 1
re 55: So, we’ve been right since the 60’s. Just think where we’d be now if we’d developed more solar.
You can thank the “Great Forgetter” for trampling that effeort.
Rich liberals usually inherit their wealth while rich republicans earn it.
50 “The British and a lot of people in the CIA still stand behind the Niger “yellow cake” report.”
Bullshit!
First of all, even if you can find a few people in the CIA who honestly believe Saddam was trying to get uranium from Nigeria, for which there is no evidence, and which makes no sense because the Nigerian mines are controlled by France, not the Nigerian government, their personal opinions don’t count. The only person who speaks for the CIA is the director, who explicitly asked the White House to remove the Nigerian reference from the SOU speech. This was followed up by at least 2 official memos stating the CIA’s official opinion that the Nigerian yellowcake claims were false.
As for the British, the so-called Butler Report, which asserts that British intelligence had independent information and did not rely on the forged Nigerian documents, was boycotted by the opposition parties and is not accepted as valid by anyone outside the self-serving Blair government.
Dan you got that wrong. Rich liberals are the ones who work. The rich righties like Baby Bush go bankrupt three times playing with papa’s money, then concoct schemes to get their friend’s companies no-bid military contracts and take the kickbacks to make their money.
@51 Everyone knows Coulter is a mercenary provocateur who does these things for money. She doesn’t have an ounce of principle in her skanky body.
The really hilarious thing is that the people being fleeced by Coulter aren’t liberals, who don’t buy her books or pay her speaking fees; they suckers whose pockets she’s emptying are the conservative boobs who kiss her feet. As P.T. Barnum said, “A fool and his money are soon parted.”
@53 Libby is a traitor, and so are you.
@54 klake says: Roger did you pay your parking tickets?
03/08/2007 at 8:51 pm
I’m sure I did, but I don’t remember specifically, since I haven’t gotten one since 1977 or threabouts.
@54 Well whaddya know, Obama was a parking ticket scofflaw in his student days at Harvard. The GOPers have had 6 months to dig up dirt on him, and this is what they’ve got so far. That, and the fact he has the most common middle name in the world, which he shares with approximately 1 billion other human beings. The GOP oppo operation doesn’t seem to be prospering these days.
@58 Actually, YLB, my understanding is a little different. The Brits came up with their bullshit independently, before the forgeries fell into their hands. This puts the Blair government in the position of being able to say, “We didn’t base our lies on those forgeries. We invented them ourselves.”
64 I’m over 60 years old and have yet to see a Republican do any work. The only people I ever see working are their employees — while they play on the golf course — and all the employees are Democrats.
73
Of course all the workers were dems where you worked. You were a guvmint employee and they were your fellow leeches who were not smart enough to make it on wellfare.
THAT CHIMP IN THE WHITE THAT DOOFUS WORSHIPS WORKED HARD AT STAYING OUT OF VIETNAM, ESPECIALLY THE LAST TWO YEARS.
HARD DRINKING THAT IS.
ALL THE WINGNUTS GO RED IN THE FACE ABOUT CLINTON PARDONING MARC RICH. I AGREE TO SOME EXTENT. RICH IS A BAD MAN.
AND SCOOTER LIBBY WAS RICH’S LAWYER!!!
Klake @ 47
“Can someone explain to me what the difference is between Clinton being convicted of perjury for lying under oath about consensual oral sex, and Libby lying about the revealing the identity of a person who for 20 years had served our nation by clandestinely seeking out information of other nations’ nuclear plans and arsenals?”
Sure…I’d be happy to explain.
1. Clinton was not convicted of perjury or obstruction of justice.
2. Libby was convicted of both perjury and obstruction of justice.
Here’s a perfect example of the pro-family Roach (an insult to bugs and beatles everywhere) approach to outraged right wingers fighting liberal moral relativism:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200.....ich_affair
I wonder if Roach knows her son is selling Crystal Meth out of her tacky McMansion?
Goldy, I am very sorry that you and your leftys needed instruction in this area. I am certain that my children figured it out without the governments help, as I. I am sorry that you and yours are lacking in this area. Possibly a little simple playground instruction n this ara will help?
As far as preventign unwanted teenage pregnancies is concerned, abstinance is 100% effective. If the boys can’t their you-know-whats out of the girls’ you-know-whats, then birth control (pill, condom, whatever) should be taught.
Let’s use all the weapons available, abstinance and birth control methods, as a way of preventing STDs and teenage pregnancy. All having kids in your teens does is set you up for a life of poverty.
Roger Rabbit says:
I new you weren’t “rabbit” enough to back up your words with actions. Those “powerful hind legs” allow you to back pedal pretty fast. You offered to bet. Why won’t you follow through? Is it because you are wrong? The bet doesn’t have to be monetary.
Even if what you said is true (again it’s just your word without any backing), it’s a far cry from the 20 multiple you claimed previously. For every 100 HNWI and CEOs that fly in private jets, approximately 5 could be Democrats. That’s significatnly more than “most” would imply. For an attorney you certainly are careless with the words you use.
Please send diagram to Rep. Hankins and family so they know where to pull there heads out of.