HorsesAss.Org

  • Home
  • About HA
  • Advertise
  • Archives
  • Donate

Why That Much Corporate Money is in Politics is Not Discussed

by Carl Ballard — Wednesday, 6/6/12, 7:33 pm

I like Joel Connelly, but in his coverage this back and forth between the Association of Washington Business and the Inslee campaign, he misses the larger point.

“As you can imagine, accepting $100,000 from a major oil company openly supporting Mr. McKenna leaves the impression that the money is intended for eventual use on behalf of Mr. McKenna against Jay Inslee,” Shimomura wrote to the AWB.

“This raises serious concerns for us, and we imagine it will raise concerns for many viewers and voters as well.” Shimomura urged the Association of Washington Business to “return Tesoro’s contribution.”

One problem: Tesoro and Equilon (Shell) were using the AWB PAC not to support McKenna, but to pass through money to Tim Eyman’s Initiative 1185. Seattlepi.com and Northwest Progressive Institute both posted stories May 11 on the pass-through. Eyman, too, explained the arrangement in a letter to his followers.

Four big oil companies, BP ($100,000), ConocoPhillips ($100,000) Tesoro ($100,000) and Equilon ($50,000) are underwriting the I-1185 signature campaign while Eyman delivers populist sound bites. BP and ConocoPhillips gave directly to the campaign.

Maybe. But I think the larger point is still holy shit, the global warming industry is throwing around how much money, again? The fact that these companies — and they are anti-Inslee companies — freely spend this much money is a huge problem. For huge companies to spend more than what most people make in a year like it’s Monopoly money is a disgrace. I realize Joel covered it before, but for that to be an aside is taking your eye off the ball.

Share:

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

Related

Comments

  1. 1

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Wednesday, 6/6/12 at 9:42 pm

    This whole problem could be solved by one federal court ruling that donating money to political campaigns violates corporations’ fiduciary responsibility to make money for their shareholders. The only way a court could not reach such a conclusion is by saying that buying politicians is a legitimate way to increase profits.

  2. 2

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Wednesday, 6/6/12 at 10:17 pm

    I suppose you could argue that $350,000 is creating (temporary) jobs for (paid) signature gatherers …

  3. 3

    SJ spews:

    Wednesday, 6/6/12 at 11:23 pm

    I am with the pookah on this.

    I have a related idea, under the Commerce clause, isn’t it true that Congress could require a federal charter? That charter could then define corps as not having certain powers of an individual … e.g. the vote and buying the vote.

    Hell, I do not even like the idea of corps being able to donate money to charities.

  4. 4

    N in Seattle spews:

    Thursday, 6/7/12 at 6:58 am

    Another part of the problem is fungibility.

    Even if the oil money is passed along to Eyman, that frees up other funds (which might otherwise have been ticketed for Tim’s crapola) to be available for AWB to throw at McKenna.

  5. 5

    wharfrat spews:

    Thursday, 6/7/12 at 7:34 am

    Roger @1 and 2; Interestingly yesterdays NYT business section had a story on bribery, concluding that in most circumstances bribery had a net positive contribution to share price and profitability and that the return far outweighed the risk. Buying politicians does reflect well on the fiduciary responsibilities of the corporation. Ray Bradbury would have spun a great yarn with this material.

  6. 6

    kim jong chillin spews:

    Thursday, 6/7/12 at 6:19 pm

    I would prefer that campaign or political contributions be limited to te following:

    Maximum contribution of $1000 per indivdual US citizen per year. No other contributions, monetary or otherwise, are acceptable. Penalty is 10 years in prison, no parole, no acceptions.

    Problem solved.

ADVERTISEMENT

Recent HA Brilliance…

  • Friday Open Thread Friday, 1/15/21
  • Wednesday Morning Open Thread Wednesday, 1/13/21
  • Monday Open Thread Monday, 1/11/21
  • Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza! Friday, 1/8/21
  • Friday Open Thread Friday, 1/8/21
  • Open Thread Jan 6 Wednesday, 1/6/21
  • First Open Thread of 2021! Monday, 1/4/21
  • Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza! Friday, 1/1/21
  • Open Thread Wednesday Wednesday, 12/30/20
  • December 28 Open Thread Monday, 12/28/20

Election 2020: Biden versus Trump

Biden
Trump
> 99.9% probability
< 0.1% probability
360 electoral votes
178 electoral votes
Electoral College Map Electoral College Map
ADVERTISEMENT

From the Cesspool…

  • Eleven Time Person Woman Man Camera TV Cognitive Noble Prize Winner in Dropping Humiliation Bombs on Rapepublican "Losers and Suckers", Elijah SFA McDotcom on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
  • RedReformed on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
  • G on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
Tweets by @GoldyHA

Please Donate

Currency:

Amount:

Can’t Bring Yourself to Type the Word “Ass”?

Eager to share our brilliant political commentary and blunt media criticism, but too genteel to link to horsesass.org? Well, good news, ladies: we also answer to HASeattle.com, because, you know, whatever. You're welcome!

Search HA

Follow Goldy

[iire_social_icons]

HA Commenting Policy

It may be hard to believe from the vile nature of the threads, but yes, we have a commenting policy. Comments containing libel, copyright violations, spam, blatant sock puppetry, and deliberate off-topic trolling are all strictly prohibited, and may be deleted on an entirely arbitrary, sporadic, and selective basis. And repeat offenders may be banned! This is my blog. Life isn’t fair.

© 2004–2021, All rights reserved worldwide. Except for the comment threads. Because fuck those guys. So there.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.