There are rumors that Rob McKenna is a Podcasting Liberally aficionado. Go figure!
The rumors have come to light following a smear campaign against Democratic Secretary of State candidate Jason Osgood, who is running against Sam Reed. The tale is long and somewhat convoluted, but I have an unimpeachable source for the rumor: me. And the source of the smear campaign? Well…as the producer of Podcasting Liberally that rumor traces it back to…me. Or, stated more concisely, the smear originated from Rob McKenna’s misunderstanding of a podcast I produced, which McKenna is rumored (by me) to regularly enjoy.
Allow me to explain.
Last Friday, Washblog front-paged a diary by jeffuppy that traces the origins of the smear, so we begin our rumor/smear adventure last Wednesday at, of all places, a meeting of the 34th District Democrats:
Part of the night’s agenda included approval of proposals to donate money to Democratic candidates for statewide office.
…I stood and introduced a motion to contribute to Democratic Secretary of State candidate Jason Osgood. I expected little or no opposition….However, to my surprise, King County Council Member Dow Constantine stood to speak in opposition. Constantine was clearly upset with Osgood, and proceeded to trash him before the group. His anger was focused on public statements he claimed Osgood has recently been making to the effect that King County uses bar-codes on ballots which allow votes to be tracked back to voters. King County uses no such system….
[…]…Jason Osgood has never said any of the things about King County ballots that he was accused of saying. In fact, Osgood has consistently and publicly said the exact opposite – that King County does not use bar-codes and that this is a good thing.
The donation motion did not pass, likely on account of the information rumor that Constantine had been so helpful in sharing spreading.
Afterward Jeffuppy asked Constantine about the rumor, and he produced an email to the King County Council from Sherril Huff, the King County Director of Elections:
…misinformation has been shared at local public meetings as well as editorial boards regarding how timing marks on ballots are used in King County. Unfortunately a candidate running for office publicly misstated that King County ballots can be traced back to the voter using a bar code on the ballot.
Not fully satisfied by this email that was all spiced-up in bureaucrateese, Jeffuppy asked Huff for a plain-language translation including when and where she had heard Osgood make these statements. But she had not actually heard the statements. Rather, Nick Handy, State Director of Elections (an office that under the Secretary of State’s office), had shared this information with her.
So Jeffuppy asked Handy the same “when and where” question. Remarkably, Handy didn’t have firsthand knowledge either.
He had simply been told about them, he said, by Attorney General Rob McKenna and by Eastside State Representative Fred Jarret. They had in turn been told about them by unnamed citizens.
That adds two more generations to the rumor.
Chad Shue writing at the Seattle Examiner summarizes the chain rumor thusly:
So there you have it. Based on unchecked statements by “unnamed citizens” allegedly passed on by Republican office holders to the chief deputy of the incumbent Republican candidate for the office that oversees state elections, the Director of Elections for King County has (hopefully unwittingly) aided in the effort to undermine the credibility of the Democratic candidate for that office.
Or, more succinctly: it was a “he said that she said that he said that they said that people said that Jason Osgood said…” chain rumor.
Last June 10th, just as his campaign was starting up, we had had Jason Osgood on the weekly Podcasting Liberally panel. If he was going to make a misstatement on the record, this early appearance would be the place. I’ve pulled out the relevant segment where Jason discusses King County and the bar code controversy (which is really about San Juan county):
[audio:http://horsesass.org/wp-content/uploads/secretballot2.mp3]Osgood does mention King and San Juan counties in the same breath. I can see how someone might mistakenly think that Jason was flagging King county as one of the problem counties…particularly, if that someone is a closeted Podcasting Liberally buff secretly listening to the podcast in the privacy of men’s room stall in one ear while maintaining vigilance with the other ear. (As an aside, the “men’s room” stuff isn’t officially part of the rumor…I just threw that in as a hypothetical.)
Such an interpretation of Osgood’s words would be mistaken, as is clear from the transcript:
You know, I have studied King County the most, and Washington to a lesser extent. And nationally, I’m not very interested in Florida, New Mexico. I know that there are problems, but we are looking at King County. We’re looking a San Juan county and the issues that we’re facing here.
We have a constitutional right to a secret ballot. That means no one can determine how we vote—should not be able to determine—not possible. And in San Juan county and other counties using the same system, they have a unique bar code that is linked to your voter ID which is tracked—your mail ballot is tracked—all the way through to tabulation.
Jason mentions King county in passing but only before he raises the secret ballot issue, after which he only mentions San Juan county.
As long as politicians blissfully pass along unverified, fifth-generation rumors that tangibly cost a candidate money and support, I’d like to get in on the game. So, based on a simple plausibility argument (i.e. with no violations of the laws of physics), I offer a new rumor that sheds shocking new light on the fifth generation rumor about Osgood. My rumor is that Rob McKenna is a huge fan of Podcasting Liberally. That explains everything, because he obviously listened to our podcast, and simply misunderstood what Osgood was saying. McKenna started the Osgood rumor chain by passing his misunderstanding on to Handy and Huff.
Yeah, sure…I’ve got no real proof that Rob McKenna really enjoys the podcast—perhaps that is a stretch. By the standards of our esteemed politicians, however, spreading a rumor that McKenna enjoys the podcast is pretty tame stuff. And let me say, it is a real honor to have Rob as a fan of the podcast…I appreciate the patronage, even if it occasionally catalyzes a false rumor.
Oh…and Rob McKenna is a Muslim.
ByeByeGOP spews:
I’ve heard all sorts of rumors about Rod McKenna and wide stances in bathroom stalls. But they could be just rumors. Or they could be true. And using this technique, the right has long gotten away with spewing absolute bullshit and never been called on it.
Look at Faux News. During a news segment they will run a crawl that asks a question. “….did Hillary Clinton help Osama bin Laden?…” then they will never actually do a news story or have any information to offer. They just want to put that out there.
Then some inbred ass-lick sites that as a “source” that Hillary Clinton did thus and so.
Accordingly, we should fight fire with fire. With my own money, I am running robo calls that ask questions about prominent republican (oops “GOP”) politicians like:
Did _______ spend time in jail for DUI?
Did _______ have an out of wedlock child?
Did _______ cheat on his wife?
It appears this is all it will take to win an election.
Troll spews:
Rob McKenna bad. Darcy Burner good. Dino Rossi bad. Christine Gregoire good. Dave Reichert bad. Rob McKenna bad. Darcy Burner good. Dino Rossi bad. Christine Gregoire good. Dave Reichert bad. Rob McKenna bad. Darcy Burner good. Dino Rossi bad. Christine Gregoire good. Dave Reichert bad….
Goebbels would be proud of this blog.
ByeByeGOP spews:
@2 And you should know how Goebbels would feel Troll since you are one of his most ardent followers.
Richard Pope spews:
Darryl — exactly who is ROD McKenna? Is he any relation to state Attorney General ROB McKenna?
Faceless Bureaucrat spews:
I’m really surprised that the Democrats and their blogger allies haven’t picked up yet on Sam Reed’s very weird management style. This guy could be knocked off if folks did a little digging. Start with former employees — they will talk if you approach them discreetly.
Darryl spews:
Richard,
“Darryl — exactly who is ROD McKenna? Is he any relation to state Attorney General ROB McKenna?”
I suppose Rod could be Rob’s better endowed brother?
Jane Balough's Dog spews:
Did _______ spend time in jail for DUI?
Did _______ have an out of wedlock child?
Did _______ cheat on his wife?
Well if the politician is a democrat it’s yes to all three. No brainer. hehehehe
Jane Balough's Dog spews:
Here is an interesting statistic, 100% of the democrat nominees for VP who have ran in the last six years say it’s OK to cheat on your wife if she is going through chemotherapy. Huh. You learn something new every day. roof roof.
horsesasswhole spews:
Who knew Sam Reed even had an opponent…if this is being thrown out at McKenna methinks Ladenburg is pretty toasty too.
Richard Pope spews:
Darryl @ 6
I suppose Rod could be Rob’s better endowed brother?
They would both be pricks then!
K spews:
Dog @ 7- no brainer explains all your posts in a nutshell. No brains, just BS.
sparky spews:
11#
BS with bad grammar.
I recall Newtie served divorce papers to his wife who was in the hospital with cancer..not a VP candidate, but a favored son, no less.
But, since he is a Republican, that’s different.
Geov spews:
Darryl – do you mean Island County or San Juan County? Island County is Whidbey; San Juan County is a separate (and much less populous) jurisdiction.
Darryl spews:
Goev,
Oops…right. Fixed. Thanks.
correctnotright spews:
@8: 100% of the current GOP candidates running for President cheated on their disabled wife.
Oh, and dog – I know you are illiterate – but the proper way to express it is…candidates who HAVE run.
Your ignorance of proper english is matched only by your ignorance of real facts and politics. While trying, oh so hard, to be clever – you have demonstrated how pathetically truth and fact challenged you really are…sad, oh so sad. No wonder Faux news is where you get your so-called information – you can’t even tell it is biased and false.