$535k house, no money down, no payments for 2 years and the house is becoming an eyesore on the neighborhood.
And she’s a Democratic Congresswoman. The American taxpayer should not be bailing out people in the mortgage mess. Let the market correct itself.
Stupidity should be painful. Although it would be debilitating for some of you.
4
Politically Incorrectspews:
People should assume responsibility for their mistakes.
5
YLBspews:
Stupidity should be painful. Although it would be debilitating for some of you.
It has definitely debilitated you. Witness the other cut and paste about the Decemberists yesterday.
The bank takes back the house and sells it. What’s taking them so long? Poor neighbors. Can’t handle an object lesson in current economic circumstances.
Must be a bunch of right wingers.
6
ByeByeGOPspews:
Questions that FlipFlopJohnBoyMcCain doesn’t want to answer…
1) Why should we trust you since you’ve changed almost every major position that you campaigned on in 2000?
2) Why are you fighting so hard to keep Nam-era war records sealed?
3) Why won’t your wife open up her tax returns as have the wives of every major Presidential candidate? Does she have something to hide?
4) Speaking of hiding – you have admitted to serious cancer problems in the past. Why won’t you open up your medical records to the media? You promised to do so nine months ago.
5) How can you claim to detest lobbyists yet, your campaign is almost exclusively run by lobbyists.
6) Why should people trust you given your history with the Keating Five? Are you still in touch with any of those people and doesn’t it show your lack of judgment that you made friends with all those felons?
7) How do you propose to staff and fund the armed forces sufficiently to fight all the wars you claim to want? You have threatened Iran, Cuba and said 100 years in Iraq is okay with you. Who’s going to pay for that and who’s going to do the fighting?
7
YLBspews:
3 – Why did the bank lend the money without the buyer putting up any cash of their own?
Elect FlipFlopMcCain and you can extend the Bush economy. The right must be proud.
12
Puddybudspews:
BJ@10: That was a headless lucy argument…And we know what side he’s on.
13
rhp6033spews:
The House Judiciary Committee just voted to subpoena Karl Rove, after spending most of the past year negotiating with his lawyers to have him appear voluntarily.
Rove has refused to appear, and his lawyer has said he will appear only behind closed doors, not under oath, and without any transcript of his testimony. Rove’s lawyers are citing executive priviledge, but that flies in the face of the fact that Rove has told his side of the story numerous times on TV and Radio interviews, and offering to discuss conversations as long as he is not under oath seems to fly in the face of the claim that a President is entitled to privacy with respect to his conversations with his advisors. In most courts, that would amount to “waiving the priviledge”.
Obviously, the only reason Rove wants to make sure he is not under oath, and there is no record of his testimony, is so he can lie and still not be charged with perjury.
Personally, I think they should have subpoenoed him a year ago, and if he refused to appear they should have sent the Sargent at Arms to his residence along with some D.C. cops and hauled him to the House Floor where they would conduct an immediate trial on a charge of Contempt of Congress, a criminal offense.
re 12: No. What side is headless lucy on? Headless Lucy is a patriot of the first order and you are a WingNut freak who would sell his grandmother’s underwear to make another financial contribution to some cockamamie hard-right scheme to fleece the honest working man.
You never told us why you hate unions. Answer the question, Mr. Fraidycat.
Why do you hate unions and slavishly worship rich people. You are not worthy of the presence of God, you reeking failure.
15
GSspews:
How’s Gregoire planning on enforcing her new Internet sales tax collection scheme coming in July to an internet near you?
The Supreme court already ruled in the Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and the Physical Presence Rule for Sales Tax Collection.
The Supreme Court sided with Quill, ruling that a taxpayer must have a physical presence in a state in order to require collection of sales or use tax for purchases made by in-state customers
How many Washington attorneys (nand at what cost) will it take to police every business on the internet?
16
GSspews:
How’s Gregoire planning on enforcing her new Internet sales tax collection scheme supposedly (but highly doughtfully without massive legal challenges) coming in July to an internet near you?
The Supreme court already ruled in the Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and the Physical Presence Rule for Sales Tax Collection.
The Supreme Court sided with Quill, ruling that a taxpayer must have a physical presence in a state in order to require collection of sales or use tax for purchases made by in-state customers.
How many Washington attorneys (and at what cost) will it take to police every business on the internet?
Daddy Love spews:
Can you say “peak oil is behind us?” I knew you could.
Don Joe spews:
@ 1
Better watch out. Puddles will spank you, ’cause the IEA is based in Paris.
delbert spews:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.co.....iforn.html
$535k house, no money down, no payments for 2 years and the house is becoming an eyesore on the neighborhood.
And she’s a Democratic Congresswoman. The American taxpayer should not be bailing out people in the mortgage mess. Let the market correct itself.
Stupidity should be painful. Although it would be debilitating for some of you.
Politically Incorrect spews:
People should assume responsibility for their mistakes.
YLB spews:
Stupidity should be painful. Although it would be debilitating for some of you.
It has definitely debilitated you. Witness the other cut and paste about the Decemberists yesterday.
The bank takes back the house and sells it. What’s taking them so long? Poor neighbors. Can’t handle an object lesson in current economic circumstances.
Must be a bunch of right wingers.
ByeByeGOP spews:
Questions that FlipFlopJohnBoyMcCain doesn’t want to answer…
1) Why should we trust you since you’ve changed almost every major position that you campaigned on in 2000?
2) Why are you fighting so hard to keep Nam-era war records sealed?
3) Why won’t your wife open up her tax returns as have the wives of every major Presidential candidate? Does she have something to hide?
4) Speaking of hiding – you have admitted to serious cancer problems in the past. Why won’t you open up your medical records to the media? You promised to do so nine months ago.
5) How can you claim to detest lobbyists yet, your campaign is almost exclusively run by lobbyists.
6) Why should people trust you given your history with the Keating Five? Are you still in touch with any of those people and doesn’t it show your lack of judgment that you made friends with all those felons?
7) How do you propose to staff and fund the armed forces sufficiently to fight all the wars you claim to want? You have threatened Iran, Cuba and said 100 years in Iraq is okay with you. Who’s going to pay for that and who’s going to do the fighting?
YLB spews:
3 – Why did the bank lend the money without the buyer putting up any cash of their own?
The bank is not “stupid”?
Moron (Delbert, that is).
ByeByeGOP spews:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.c.....ack22.html
Looks like the media is JUST getting started digging up FlipFlop McCain’s dirty laundry.
YLB spews:
Mr. “straight talk” is a fraud.
The media has given this guy a pass for too long.
He’s not fit for office.
Blue John spews:
If Iraq was fought for Oil, where our $1.50 a gallon gas?
ByeByeGOP spews:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24776011/
Elect FlipFlopMcCain and you can extend the Bush economy. The right must be proud.
Puddybud spews:
BJ@10: That was a headless lucy argument…And we know what side he’s on.
rhp6033 spews:
The House Judiciary Committee just voted to subpoena Karl Rove, after spending most of the past year negotiating with his lawyers to have him appear voluntarily.
Rove has refused to appear, and his lawyer has said he will appear only behind closed doors, not under oath, and without any transcript of his testimony. Rove’s lawyers are citing executive priviledge, but that flies in the face of the fact that Rove has told his side of the story numerous times on TV and Radio interviews, and offering to discuss conversations as long as he is not under oath seems to fly in the face of the claim that a President is entitled to privacy with respect to his conversations with his advisors. In most courts, that would amount to “waiving the priviledge”.
Obviously, the only reason Rove wants to make sure he is not under oath, and there is no record of his testimony, is so he can lie and still not be charged with perjury.
Personally, I think they should have subpoenoed him a year ago, and if he refused to appear they should have sent the Sargent at Arms to his residence along with some D.C. cops and hauled him to the House Floor where they would conduct an immediate trial on a charge of Contempt of Congress, a criminal offense.
Duncan Renaldo spews:
re 12: No. What side is headless lucy on? Headless Lucy is a patriot of the first order and you are a WingNut freak who would sell his grandmother’s underwear to make another financial contribution to some cockamamie hard-right scheme to fleece the honest working man.
You never told us why you hate unions. Answer the question, Mr. Fraidycat.
Why do you hate unions and slavishly worship rich people. You are not worthy of the presence of God, you reeking failure.
GS spews:
How’s Gregoire planning on enforcing her new Internet sales tax collection scheme coming in July to an internet near you?
The Supreme court already ruled in the Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and the Physical Presence Rule for Sales Tax Collection.
The Supreme Court sided with Quill, ruling that a taxpayer must have a physical presence in a state in order to require collection of sales or use tax for purchases made by in-state customers
How many Washington attorneys (nand at what cost) will it take to police every business on the internet?
GS spews:
How’s Gregoire planning on enforcing her new Internet sales tax collection scheme supposedly (but highly doughtfully without massive legal challenges) coming in July to an internet near you?
The Supreme court already ruled in the Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and the Physical Presence Rule for Sales Tax Collection.
The Supreme Court sided with Quill, ruling that a taxpayer must have a physical presence in a state in order to require collection of sales or use tax for purchases made by in-state customers.
How many Washington attorneys (and at what cost) will it take to police every business on the internet?