It sounds like a Big. Fucking. Deal. The Washington State Supreme Court has just found the state Legislature in contempt of court. Boy are they in trouble, now, huh?
The court said in an order issued Thursday it would hold off on punishing the Legislature until after the 2015 session. If lawmakers do not complete their plan for fixing the way the state pays for public schools by the end of that legislative session, the court promises to reconvene and impose sanctions and other remedial measures.
Oh. Dang…I was hoping for something more like Rodney Fucking Tom being frogmarched to the gates of the Monroe prison.
The contempt finding is related to the McLeary vs. State case, in which the Supreme Court ordered the Legislature to fully fund the state’s public education to be in compliance with the State Constitution that makes it the
…paramount duty of the state to make ample provision for the education of all children….
The Court has repeatedly “emphasized” that the State is engaged in an ongoing violation of this constitutional duty, and has known that funding is “constitutionally inadequate” for decades.
But the lack of “ample provision for […] educaton” isn’t what the Legislature was found in contempt for. Rather, it is because they are late with a report telling the Justices how they planned to fully fund education. Specifically:
After the 2014 legislative session, the Committee issued its report to the court. In it, the Committee admitted that “[t]he Legislature did not enact additional timelines in 2014 to implement the program of basic education as directed by the Court in its January 2014 Order.” […]
[O]n Spetember 3, 2014…the State again admitted that it did not comply with the court’s January 2014 order….
[…][T]he court unaimously finds the State in contempt for failing to comply with the court’s January 9, 2014 order.
They are tardy with their homework, just like children in school, who would simply earn an F.
Rather than handing out an F, the Court offers this:
Sanctions and other remedial measures are held in abeyance to allow the State the opportunity to comply with the court’s order during the 2015 legislative session. If by adjournment of the 2015 legislative session the State has not purged the contempt by complying with the court’s order, the court will reconvene to impose sanctions and other remedial measures as necessary.
And if the Legislature fails again, the court wants a report on why they should not sanction. Otherwise…
[n]o other pleadings should be filed by any of the parties except at the direction of the court.
In other words, “shut up and finish your damn homework!”
Why doesn’t the court stop screwing around and solve the problem by issuing a judicial decree imposing a state income tax?
It’s good to know that the Court will extend me the same leniency if I am even found in contempt.
So which social services will they cut to pay for this?
@3 They can close all the nursing homes and kick the old folks onto the curb; that eliminates DSHS’s largest single expense.