HA Bible Study

Exodus 22:31
You are to be my holy people. So do not eat the meat of an animal torn by wild beasts; throw it to the dogs.

Discuss.

Comments

  1. 3

    Change in Time spews:

    @1 I was wondering the same thing!

    @2 Thanks for setting us straight…

    I swerved to avoid a possum last night. Almost didn’t as I’m broke so was thinking possum stew. I wasn’t in a cougar, so I guess it would have been ok in God’s eyes.

  2. 7

    spews:

    5 – zzzzZZZZZzz…

    Uh dawg, err right winger… Stephen Hawking is a physicist not a paleontologist or an evolutionary biologist..

    Hmmmm.. I don’t recall Hawking ever crowing about his oh so superior “family values” either..

  3. 8

    Liberal Scientist thinks that concentrated power and wealth should be met with suspicion, not adoration spews:

    @5

    And why haven’t you evolutionists said something about the disgusting behaviour (sic) of Steven (sic) Hawking?

    What kind of asshole are you?

    The kind that cannot spell, use a spellchecker, or get Stephen Hawking’s name right, obviously.

    What does the rational belief in evolution have to do with Stephen Hawking at all?

    Why begrudge a transcendently brilliant man, confined to a wheelchair by a savage neuromuscular disorder, a little carnal pleasure, if it’s any of our businesses at all?

    That’s the rub, isn’t it? We evolutionists, and rational thinkers, and progressives, believe both in the joys of carnal pleasure, and the notion of privacy and being left alone.

    You knuckledraggers and mouthbreathers, bible-thumpers and preacher/grifters, OTH, are so tied up in knots, filled with condemnation of others because of your own inner conflicts, and so overwhelmed and disturbed by the notion, that someone, somewhere, is happy, that you have to stick your nose in everyone else’s business and do your damnedest to stomp out any semblance of joy.

    I for one, would be happy to buy Stephen a lapdance.

    Dickhead.

  4. 9

    Liberal Scientist thinks that concentrated power and wealth should be met with suspicion, not adoration spews:

    I guess the simple answer to the dickhead @5 would be, “What disgusting behavior?”

  5. 12

    Doc Daneeka spews:

    5 – more zzzzZZZzzzz…

    especially if it ain’t true.

    Care to offer a named source cited by a reputable journalist?
    Here’s a useful guideline for you:
    Whenever you read an online report of something very unexpected from a celeb-scandal service citing “unnamed sources” go ahead and giggle, blush, bat your eyelashes, and fan yourself, just like you do in the supermarket checkout line while reading The Enquirer. But don’t repeat it as if it were truth. Anymore than Martian Sasquatch abduction stories.

    Journalistic standards have taken a beating by the internet. And that becomes especially true when those standards are diluted into a global marketplace of cultural relativity amplified by the shallow vastness of the web. “Digital” reporting is not the same as The Huntley-Brinkley Report. “Digital” reporting from Mumbai even less so. Try to be just a bit less credulous until you are more familiar with a source. But if the boredom of retirement leaves you with nothing to do but engage in scandal mongering gossip about celebrities, be honest enough to present it as such.
    We’ll still mock you when you do, though.

  6. 13

    Steve spews:

    According to the anonymous source, who has been a member of Freedom Acres swingers club for nearly half a decade, “After a vagina-smother lap dance by me, Stephen will often cry out, “There is a God!””.

    heh. I made that up. Well, except for the source. But who are you gonna believe? The BBC or the gal from the Freedom Acres swing club?

  7. 14

    Charly Tuna spews:

    Whats with you guys?

    You seem upset that a 70 year old man might want to enjoy being TIT-illated? Did I take the namje of one of your saints in vain?

    Howisit that a post on a major web based bew source is suspect? Is t because you are all white guys and do not trust a brown people’s website?

    Funny thing about this .. your President apologizes for burning a Quran or three … that is OK but you are irate when I relate a story about a paralytic astro physicist who enjoys getting it on? Is Hawking YOUR Muhamed?

  8. 16

    Politically Incorrect spews:

    Let’s see: the Bible was put together by a bunch of Christians who, hoping to gain favor with Roman Emporer Constantine, did exactly what Constatntine wanted in order to have a “Bible” for Christians. Certain “books” were included and others were left out, even though they were written by earlier Christians.

    In other words, the Bible is a book put together under the direction and total command of a Pagan Roman emporer (he never did give up his old gods and godesseds) so that Constantine could solidify and maintain his grip on power. In a lot of ways. Christianity represents the final and lasting triumph of the Roman Empire. We are still suffering from Constantine’s and the early Chritians’ actions 1,600 years later.

  9. 18

    Liberal Scientist thinks that concentrated power and wealth should be met with suspicion, not adoration spews:

    Does anyone here (rational people, that is) understand what was written in post 14?

    I mean, first he writes:

    And why haven’t you evolutionists said something about the disgusting behaviour of Steven Hawking?

    and then:

    You seem upset that a 70 year old man might want to enjoy being TIT-illated? Did I take the namje of one of your saints in vain?

    This assclown can’t get his story straight, nor can he/she type or spell.

    Fantastic waste of skin.

  10. 19

    Liberal Scientist thinks that concentrated power and wealth should be met with suspicion, not adoration spews:

    Regarding that “Bible”, it seems that it’s a copy of the Gospel of Barnabus, if SJ is to be trusted ;), which, if I recall my Catholic theology classes, is not in fact part of the Bible per se, or, as some of our trolls prefer, The Inerrant Word of GOD ™.

    So what’s the beef?

    It’s not a Bible. Moreover, sound like the authorities grabbed it to prevent this piece of cultural patrimony from being sold into some rich fuck’s private collection. Good on the Turks.

    Not so much “Teh MOOSLUMS have stolen our BIBLE!!!!!!11!!1!!1″

    That last image provokes visions of Tuna Twit heading off on a quest to save this tome from the Infidels, not so much Richard Lionheart, so much as Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure.

  11. 20

    God spews:

    All of this rancor and yet you ignore HaNavee’s challenges to you?

    Ask yourselves, should no Jews compete with vultures and hyenas?

    Would I want MY children eating what lions leave behind?

    Would I not want Stephen Hawking to enjoy ALL of my creations?

    I am that I am.

  12. 21

    spews:

    I just looked at Little Green Footballs. Walked back through almost 2 weeks of posts and agreed with the tone of almost all of them some which were tagged “wingnuts” and lambasted the racism on other sites like Fox Nation.

    Big contrast to say 2005 when that site had to be one of the worst hate sites on the internet.

    Too bad the tuna man lost one of his favorite hangouts. Oh well there’s always Free Republic.

  13. 22

    spews:

    but the muslims holding the bible hostage, that gets NO comment?

    Last I looked the Bible was the best seller of all time.. With so many copies of it extant I doubt anyone’s going to miss out on “the Word”..

    Nice try “dawg”..

  14. 23

    spews:

    How many lovingly hand lettered Bibles enscribed by devoted medieval monks (pre-Gutenberg) have been preserved to the present time?

    Yet this muslim hating troll has his panties in a twist over one Bible in Turkey..

    What a pathetic excuse for a life this troll has.

  15. 24

    Charly Tuna spews:

    @23 YLB

    Who said i hate muslims?

    If you care at all, the reason the Vatican wants this book is because they are4 afraid it will show that their “bible” is a fraud! The book in Turkey is 1500 years old …. before the freaking printing press let the HRC, Inc (Holy Roman Church) mass copy their fraudulent version fo the word of God!

    The Muslims and the Mormons beleive the ORIGINAL book had lots of stuff about Muhamed and Moroni!

    You libs are so dumb assed that you believe anything!

  16. 26

    spews:

    Who said i hate muslims?

    23 – I do. Why mention “muslim country” in your original comment at all if it’s not to paint yourself as an anti-muslim bigot?

    I’ll tell you what I believe to be true: you’re a dumbass who swallows right wing B.S.

    And if you believe billions of Bibles out there are “fraudulent” then print the real thing stupid! I could give a flip either way.

    before the freaking printing press let the HRC, Inc (Holy Roman Church) mass copy their fraudulent version fo the word of God!

    See my previous comment about pre-Gutenberg bibles. You have many to choose from. Thanks for making my point.

    You failed dawg..

  17. 27

    spews:

    You seem upset that

    … a right wing troll is demonstrating yet again the effectiveness of the brainwashing techniques of right wing hate talk radio and paranoid religious propaganda on half-wits and other gullible sorts of people.

  18. 28

    Charly Tuna spews:

    @26 YLB

    Take a look at your Wiki.

    Turkey is a MUSLIM country?

    Is there is nothing in this bible that is not controversial, how come the HRC wants it and why won’t the imans of Turkey let it go?

    BTW .. when did your favorite Rhino, the Mittster, offer to disclose the whereabouts of the golden plates? Maybe they are in Turkey?

  19. 29

    dorky dorkman spews:

    Such fun we’ve all had here this morning. Who knows where the time goes? — except maybe Stephen Hawking — and he ain’t talkin’.

  20. 30

    Zotz sez: There's a reason they call it chicken of the sea! spews:

    @26: Remember that comment I made about a “pile of dogshit looking for a shoe”?

    In this case we’re dealing with a pile of rotting tuna.

    Here’s the thing, though: you get the stench of rotting tuna (diseased pussy?) on you even if you manage to avoid stepping in it.

  21. 31

    spews:

    28 – zzzzZZZzzzzz…

    Life looks “transcendent” indeed in Mt. Vernon. Related to Beck by any chance?

    What a joke he is. His “transcendence” was brought to us courtesy of opiate and alcohol abuse..

    Sure know how to grow them in that neck of the woods.

  22. 35

    proud leftist spews:

    If I were a paralytic, I hope to hell some friend would haul me to a strip club for a nice, innocent lap dance. Bully for Stephen Hawking (if the story is true).

  23. 36

    uptown spews:

    @24

    …before the freaking printing press let the HRC, Inc (Holy Roman Church) mass copy their fraudulent version fo the word of God

    If you even had a clue about the history of The Bible. The RC was against letting the masses have access to The Bible, wanting to leave control of it in the exclusive hands of their priests. They even hunted down and killed those who tried to translate it into English.

  24. 38

    uptown spews:

    @5

    …the Vatican Embassy in Ankara denied the reports on Thursday suggesting that the Vatican had asked Turkey to examine the copy of Bible in Ankara.

    The leather-bound Bible, which is said to be worth TL 40 million, was written on leather sheets and is now under protection as it is regarded as a valuable cultural asset.

    So much for that…

  25. 41

    spews:

    I caught a radio preacher show where they were citing something in Ecclesiastics that justified reveling in being rich.

    King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
    Ecclesiastes 5:19 Every man also to whom God hath given riches and wealth, and hath given him power to eat thereof, and to take his portion, and to rejoice in his labor; this is the gift of God.

    This was their logic. God gave the rich their riches, so it was a gift from God and God wants them to revel in his gifts. So the rich should flaunt their wealth because the poor did something to keep God from giving them wealth. The Rich deserved to be rich and the poor deserved to be poor.

    And this passes for christian preaching?

  26. 43

    Steve spews:

    @42 They obviously didn’t like this part,

    Ecclesiastes 5:10-17

    10He that loveth silver shall not be satisfied with silver; nor he that loveth abundance with increase: this is also vanity.

    11When goods increase, they are increased that eat them: and what good is there to the owners thereof, saving the beholding of them with their eyes?

    12The sleep of a labouring man is sweet, whether he eat little or much: but the abundance of the rich will not suffer him to sleep.

    13There is a sore evil which I have seen under the sun, namely, riches kept for the owners thereof to their hurt.

    14But those riches perish by evil travail: and he begetteth a son, and there is nothing in his hand.

    15As he came forth of his mother’s womb, naked shall he return to go as he came, and shall take nothing of his labour, which he may carry away in his hand.

    16And this also is a sore evil, that in all points as he came, so shall he go: and what profit hath he that hath laboured for the wind?

    17All his days also he eateth in darkness, and he hath much sorrow and wrath with his sickness.

  27. 44

    Gary Moore spews:

    What has happened to this Blog? Haven’t read this for a few years but it appears to have declined into leftists & atheists assclowning each other. There is no legitimate debate anymore. You used to have a guy named Puddy who made things interesting. What happened to him?
    Total garbage. The Blog has devolved into a Horses Ass.

  28. 47

    spews:

    leftists & atheists assclowning each other.

    Now, now with the projecting friendo. You have a goat herd to tend to.

    There is no legitimate debate anymore. You used to have a guy named Puddy who made things interesting. What happened to him?

    Not a single post in 2012 from Puddybud. Must be committed at Western State. About time too. To be frank there never was much of a debate here. This is a place where right wingers came to paste their talking points, defend the indefensible and name-call and we on the other side would have fun picking it all apart and laughing at it.

    Now the right wing “assclowns” have mostly left and we’ll see where it goes from here.

    Nice try.. Please be a little child somewhere else now.

  29. 48

    Gary Moore spews:

    Who is Durward Kirby???
    Goat herds??
    No wonder PuddyBud doesn’t post anymore.
    Do you guys ever read one of these threads with all your meaningless posts?