Please join us tonight for an evening of politics under the influence at the Seattle Chapter of Drinking Liberally. We meet at the Montlake Ale House, 2307 24th Avenue E. beginning at about 8:00 pm. Stop by even earlier and enjoy some dinner.
Not in Seattle? There is a good chance you live near one of the 344 other chapters of Drinking Liberally.
Roger Rabbit can’t attend tonight due to illness.
Have another drink–
This is probably difficult to swallow, huh?
Generic Congressional Ballot: Republicans 44%, Democrats 37%
Tuesday, March 09, 2010
Consistency by Repubicans in this poll…and the STRONG DISAPPROVAL’s for Obam-Mao, Hairy Reid in deep sh*t and Nancy Pelosi w? the Joan Rivers Plastic Face…
Rahm-Bo is a target.
David “The Devil” Axelrod is a target.
How do you get out of this mess??
Borrow more money and spread it around screwing our kids??
Yup…that’s the Dems only option as I said when the Porkulous passed. Saved the money to hand out election bribes with borrowed money.
@2 I can hardly wait for the GOP to run its generic candidates. Oh wait! Their candidates will be real people — with baggage. This is gonna be fun.
20 GOP Lawyers Repudiate Liz Cheney
Kenneth Starr and 19 other Republican lawyers have signed a letter repudiating a Liz Cheney ad that impugns DOJ lawyers who formerly defended detains.
“Such attacks also undermine the justice system” by ‘delegitimizing’ the notion that the accused should have lawyers, the letter says.
And Liz Cheney, a lawyer herself, should know better. She probably does, but chooses to elevate cheap-shot politics above the ethics of her profession.
http://www.businessweek.com/ne.....olner.html
[Deleted — see HA Comment Policy]
ROTF. Great video.
According to your ilk???
Start a new war of choice and borrow the money from China..
That would just “spread it around” to well-connected defense contractors..
Yep – that’s the right wing alternative.
Mr. Cynical,
You are becoming a lazy fuck again and cutting-n-pasting too much non-original content for the volume of original material. Please try to keep about a 50:50 ratio of original to copied content.
Thank you for your cooperation!
@5 Typical wingnut hit job, belching smoke and fire. Well, I have BAD NEWS for you, goatfucker:
“Kevin O’Connor, U.S. attorney during the administration of President George W. Bush and sometime critic of Obama administration policy, was among Chatigny’s leading supporters. ‘He could not have been in my view a better chief judge to work with,’ O’Connor said. ‘My experiences with him as U.S attorney were universally positive.’
“‘I think he will be an outstanding appellate judge,’ said Stanley Twardy, another Republican former U.S. attorney. ‘Bob really is a scholar. He has clerked for … two of the best appellate judges in the 2nd Circuit.’
“New Haven lawyer Hugh Keefe called him ‘thoughtful’ and ‘careful.’
“Carl Tobias, Williams professor of law at the University of Richmond and an expert on federal judicial appointments, said, ‘Judge Chatigny has all the qualities the U.S. seeks in appellate judges: intelligence, diligence, independence, ethics and balanced temperament.'”
http://www.courant.com/news/po.....5342.story
Roger Rabbit Commentary: The overall record of a judge, not a single incident from his career, is what should determine whether he is elevated to a higher court. As the above quotes indicate, Judge Chatigny is highly respected, and is supported by two Republican former U.S. attorneys who know him well.
There is no more important decision a judge makes than one involving the death penalty. The controversy over Judge Chatigny arises from a hearing on a stay of execution for Michael Ross, who was convicted of murdering 8 women and girls. It was an emotionally charged case that received massive publicity.
The facts are complicated. Ross, who fought execution for 17 years, abruptly waived his appeals and hired a lawyer to facilitate his execution. His father hired a lawyer to fight the execution. One of the legal issues in the hearing was whether Ross was mentally competent to waive his appeals.
Some of Judge Chatigny’s critics describe his conduct of the hearing as “heavy-handed.” They particularly cite the judge’s comment to Ross’ lawyer to “have his license” for arguing that Ross should be allowed to die. Chatigny told the lawyer he should “be in his [client’s] face” and that what the lawyer was doing was “terribly wrong.” He was also accused of a conflict of interest because of his prior involvement in the case.
Judge Chatigny had crossed paths with the case some 10 or 12 years earlier when, as a practicing lawyer, he filed a “friend of court” brief on behalf of a group of criminal defense attorneys who were “gravely concerned about the trial court’s rulings on significant evidentiary issues in this case.”
According to a newspaper, “State prosecutors filed a complaint against Chatigny, who was later absolved by a federal judicial review panel. The panel found Chatigny’s actions unusual but not improper.”
Here are the points I would make:
1. Although Ross committed horrific crimes, this fact — and the emotion and publicity surrounding the case — are not relevant factors in resolving the legal issues the judge was called upon to decide.
2. It is not a given that those who commit monstrous crimes are “monsters” who should be executed. Under our system of law, if they are insane, we do not execute them.
3. In a death penalty case, it is standard judicial procedure to not accept the condemned’s stated wish to waive his appeals without inquiry into his mental competency to make that decision. Thus, Judge Chatigny’s consideration of this issue in the stay hearing was not only appropriate but required.
4. Judge Chatigny’s handling of the hearing and the alleged conflict of interest were found by the reviewing authority not to have violated judicial ethics. This determination is authoritative for all purposes.
4. In general, the lawyer representing Ross had a duty to advocate for his client’s wishes; however, lawyers are not free of responsibility to consider whether what the client wants is in the client’s best interest, especially when the client’s life is at stake, and while I personally think the judge’s remarks exceeded proper decorum, it was appropriate in the circumstances for the judge to inquire as to whether the lawyer had properly counseled his client with respect to the decision the client was making.
5. Where life is at stake, I would rather have a judge err on the side of issuing a stay than allowing an execution to proceed which may later come into question after it is too late to rectify any error. See, e.g., Texas GOP Gov. Rick Perry’s shameful handling of the Todd Cameron Willingham case.
In this case, partisan Republicans have turned a Democratic judicial nominee’s handling of a highly charged death penalty case into a political football. Far from offering a reasoned discussion of the judge’s qualifications for higher judicial office, they are seeking to inflame public opinion against him. When the Senate considers whether this nomination should be confirmed, light will be much more useful than heat.
Additional sources:
http://www.courant.com/news/po.....5342.story
http://donpesci.blogspot.com/2.....thics.html
Holy Shit Batman, Roger Rabbit had a lucid moment until the last paragraph when he returned to his current role as THE DUMB BUNNY. To THE DUMB BUNNY, Puddy thought this was the old Roger Rabbit, writing useful legal commentary, then Puddy was saddened to see THE DUMB BUNNY write last paragraph of political BULLSHIT.
Too bad, Puddy thought the old Roger Rabbit was back, instead THE DUMB BUNNY reverted for about 10 minutes.
So THE DUMB BUNNY, when is the death penalty “warranted”?
“I have strong reservations about Judge Chatigny’s actions during the conference he conducted in the Michael Ross case,” Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said.” He’s a DUMMOCRAPT THE DUMB BUNNY!
Nancy Pelosi on health care,
“We have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it away from the fog of the controversy.”
P R I C E L E S S
Puddy
Have you had a stroke?
Your last two posts are confyusing enough to have been written by GWB!
ROFL. Really nice video!
Obam-Mao is now securely saddled in his worst poll numbers ever-
IN the SAME POLL–Obam-Mao-Klown has gone from +32….DOWN DOWN DOWN to -21
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Obam-Mao, Pelosi, Reid, RahmBo and THE Devil Axelrod….dragging the Democrat Party down the tubes.
Too Damn Funny!
PS-
Sorry Darryl–I found the content I posted of great interest.
Puddy @ 11–
Plastic Face Pelosi wants the Bill passed so we can “see what is in it”??
Sadly, she is doing the very best she can.
What a dope.
No wonder Americans think so lowly of Congress…and 2 DEMOCRATS are the leaders!!
But hey, they will throw borrowed Stimulus Money around during election time and rope in the stupes who love “free stuff” today no matter what the consequences tomorrow.
Hey, did you hear the Chief Justice rip Oba-Mao today for degenerating the SOU address to political cheerleading??
Roberts is soooooooooo right on.
I really like the guy.
Thomas & Scalia too.
Limbaugh spews about black Governor Paterson: “So, for the first time in his life, Paterson’s gonna be a massa. Interesting, interesting.”
Well, at least Limbaugh didn’t call him a flying monkey. That would have made Mr. Klynical cry.
The Liz is becoming erratic enough to be the Sarah’s VP choice. Are we looking at the Republican dream ticket for 2010?
@2 KLOWN spews: “Hairy Reid in deep sh*t and Nancy Pelosi w? the Joan Rivers Plastic Face…
Rahm-Bo is a target.
David “The Devil” Axelrod is a target.”
@14 KLOWN spews: “Obam-Mao-Klown” “RahmBo and THE Devil Axelrod”
@15 KLOWN spews: “Plastic Face Pelosi”
FRom another thread:
And how old are you, KLOWN? And why do you project your infantile namecalling onto Roger? It’s a Psych 101 thing, you know what I mean? And how Christian of you, focusing your attention on the speck in Roger’s eye while you ignore the beam in your own. Hypocrite.
Seems to be the only vocabulary you KLOWNS understand steve.
I’m speaking in your “goat-fornication” lingo.
Remember your months & months of focus on goat f*cking??
You are the last one to try and be the “civility police”!!
BTW–
Reid is Hairy.
Pelosi does have a plastic face.
Rahm is a tough guy.
Axelrod is the devil
Obam-Mao is a Chairman Mao wannabe.
So what’s the problem??
Is there any bigger hypocrite showing up here than the hate-filled, scripture spewing KLOWN?
You banned the wrong person, Goldy. Bring back Marvin and get rid of the KLOWN. This cesspool will be better for it.
Babbling about goats again, you fucking psycho-freak? Got issues or something?
SeattleJew…
Having problems deciphering Nancy Pelosi’s words? Hmmm… The problem may be more difficult than Puddy thought. Say hi to the Mrs.
Cynical,
Personally Puddy thinks SCOTUS CJ Roberts is sad how Odumba makes everything political theater like THE DUMB BUNNY does here. When Odumba personally attacks the justices it doesn’t make for “ending of politics as usual in Washington”, instead Odumba elevates the partisan bickering to a new zenith.
Now back to SeattleJew…
The long-winded post by THE DUMB BUNNY was a shimmering hologram of Roger Rabbit hiding within THE DUMB BUNNY. Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal is 100% DUMMOCRAPT, thinking about running in the Chris Dodd senate seat. Yet all THE DUMB BUNNY does is attack Republicans who question Judge Chatigny’s handling of the hearing while completely glossing over Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal’s commentary. Sad to see you have issues reading SeattleJew.
Remember SeattleJew, Chris Dodd is the surviving half of the La Brasserie waitress sandwich. Look it up since you probably forgot the PuddyPost!
Steve,
I notice Cynical strikes a nerve reminding you of your previous goat sex posts. Actually it’s kinda funny dude.
“So what’s the problem??”
For starters, KLOWN, there’s your blatant hypocricy, followed up by your delusional holier-than-thou rants, capped by your utter stupidity. You have no redeeming qualities, KLOWN.
@25 Strike a nerve? Are you kidding me? If the KLOWN wants to babble on about goats, that’s his fucking problem, not mine.
Puddy @10: Four points in response.
1. I’m a liberal propagandist and Democratic party hack, and shilling for that viewpoint is what I do on this blog. Deal with it, or seek counseling for your hurt feelings.
2. That said, I did not endorse Judge Chatigny’s nomination for the federal appellate bench in my comment. I don’t know enough about him to take a position. On paper, he appears to have good credentials, having followed the usual judicial career track (top student/Law Review-judicial clerkship-practicing attorney-trial judge experience). But to really evaluate any appointment to an appellate court, you have to review a cross-section of the nominee’s past work, particularly his judicial decisions, which I haven’t done. Presumably, he was vetted by the White House and his general views were found to be consistent with Democratic values — which is no reason to keep him off the bench.
3. The only categorical argument I would make about the death penalty is that it should be limited to murder cases. Whether it is warranted must be decided on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific facts of the case. Thus, I am unable to make any general statement on this question.
4. I am well aware that Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (a) is a Democrat, and (b) criticized Judge Chatigny’s conduct of the stay hearing. I wonder if you are cognizant that, unlike the two former GOP U.S. attorneys, Blumenthal was not a disinterested or impartial observer. As AG, he is the state’s chief prosecutor, and was a litigant in this case advocating on behalf of the state court’s death sentence. In general, attorneys involved in a case are not permitted to personally criticize the judge, as that tends to undermine the impartial administration of justice, but they may do so in the context of legal argument in an appeal of the judge’s ruling and/or in pursuit of a judicial conduct complaint against the judge, which is what happened here.
@15 For all your drooling on these comment threads, I don’t remember seeing you post anything constructive about the problems in our healthcare system the Democrats are trying to fix. You seem perfectly satisfied with a status quo in which nearly 50 million of your fellow Americans have no coverage, those of us who do pay on average $1,200 a year in higher premiums for their unpaid care, the majority of personal bankruptcies in this country are caused by medical bills, people are dying because insurance companies refuse to pay for treatment, and no one (including the insured) is safe from medical bankruptcy. Tell us, Klown: What, if anything, in your position on this issue merits credibility or respect from the respect of us?
@15 “But hey, they will throw borrowed Stimulus Money around during election time and rope in the stupes who love “free stuff” today no matter what the consequences tomorrow.”
A lot of that stimulus money has gone to states to maintain public services like police and fire, health care, courts and prisons, and other general fund expenditures without state tax increases. We will be more than happy to campaign on this record at election time.
We also plan to run ads showing Republican congress critters trying to take credit for stimulus projects in their districts they in fact opposed. We also plan to inform voters that certain Republican governors who grandstanded about refusing stimulus money in fact eagerly accepted and spent it.
Once again THE DUMB BUNNY, Paul Ryan presented proposals which Odumba in the great “health care conference” continually rejected. Odumba still hasn’t crafted “new legislation”, just using the same tired senate bill.
So you are back to 50 Million uninsured THE DUMB BUNNY?
Once again, I want to personally thank Klown for making his ass available for our kicking pleasure. This would be a much more boring blog if he didn’t provide us with opportunities to make fun of his stupidity and cupidity.
@31 “Paul Ryan presented proposals which Odumba in the great “health care conference” continually rejected.”
Yeah, and I reject them, too. Privatize Social Security and Medicare? Fuck him with a capital “F”.
Then why didn’t you include Blumenthal’s commentary in your diatribe above? Ooops my bad… you are a hack who can’t see both sides of any argument.
@31 (continued) Hell, I don’t know what the number is, putz. It’s somewhere between 45 million and 52 million. Take your pick, I don’t care.
@34 I’m a hack who knows both sides of the arguments and advocates for one of them. You’ve been on this blog for, what, three years or so? If you haven’t figured out by now that I’m a partisan, you never will, and it’s useless trying to explain it to you.
Then why didn’t you include Blumenthal’s commentary in your diatribe above? Oh Puddy knows what you are THE DUMB BUNNY.
20. Steve spews:
Spoken like a true intellectual midget who cannot make a lucid argument!!
When you can’t beat ’em…BAN ‘EM!!
Right Steve?
Oh and Steve–
It’s you, YLB, headlice and the pelletizer who make this a cesspool.
It is funny that Leftist Pinheads like you resort to excessive vulgarity about goat sex and other nonsense…and ruin the comment threads of a Leftist Blog!!
If anyone should be banned, it’s YOU!
29. Roger Rabbit spews:
Of course I have…you just disagree.
I repeatedly referred to the Price-Waterhouse-Coopers Actuarial Study which included ideas like Tort Reform (not only the impact on actual lawsuit costs…but defensive medicine) as well as Interstate Competition between insurers.
Why are those bad ideas??
Obam-Mao is trying to ram this thru.
Fine.
There will be negative consequences for Democrats.
PS__
Too have folks bring forth ideas…then scream that they have no ideas…doesn’t work too well.
Obam-Mao is finding out his angry, hollow rhetoric is causing him to tank in the polls.
Rog Spews–
I thought it was STIMULOUS money Rog? To stimulate the economy. Not bail out states that can’t make tough decisions and stop spending.
hhmmmm, what to do with Jihad Jane???
how about immediate execution after guilt is proved.
Done.
@38 “When you can’t beat ‘em…BAN ‘EM!!”
You’ll never get it, you dumbass KLOWN. I don’t want you banned for your views. I want you banned because you’re the dumbest bastard I’ve ever run across in my life. Nobody here beats you at the stupid, not manoftruth, not Gman, not Troll. As for Marvin, he could spot you 50 IQ points, have a lobotomy, and still run circles around your mindless, dumbass self, no contest. You haven’t presented a single redeeming quality and I’d be very pleased to say good riddance to your sorry ass.
@41
That is stimulus spending you goat-fucking moran!
Or don’t you know that if you lay off government employees you just shift what account you are paying them out of, especially in a recession where replacement jobs might be hard to find. Furthermore if you lay off those government employees the are going to cut back on their personal spending which depresses the economy further and cuts tax revenue.
Stimulus spending is by its very definition having government go out and buy more goods and services to partially replace the goods and services not being bought by individuals and businesses.
What the fuck do you think stimulus spending is supposed to be?
43
I have to concur. What’s worse is that Cynny seems to be declining. It’s hard to believe that is possible, but I think he is. His posts have become more and more mindless and repetitive. He never adds anything of substance to a thread. He has no sense of humor–even Puddy beats him in that regard. If he had any sense of dignity he would just disappear.
@38 I don’t think you should be banned. I think you should bend over. It’s the goat’s turn.
@39 “It’s you, YLB, headlice and the pelletizer who make this a cesspool.”
I can’t speak for the others, but I’m guilter ‘n’ shit and PROUD of it, because cranks like you have it coming.
@40 I said “constructive.” Your tort reform argument is Wingnut Bullshit. Legal costs account for less than 2% of health spending. Furthermore, studies show most doctos would practice defensive medicine anyway. Sure, let’s have tort reform — let’s set up a system of compensating injured patients similar to L&I. Are you for that?
@41 It does stimulate the economy by preventing layoffs and preserving public services that support job formation.
43. Steve spews:
Ahhhhh, I understand now thin-skinned steve.
The more Obam-Mao and the Progressive Bowel Movement tanks…the thinner your skin.
Your leftist klownmates blew a +32 Strong Approval rating in a year!
Shows you cannot lead…just complain.
C’mon steve–
Certainly your endless diatribes don’t qualify you for Mr. Intellectual??
Hundreds & thousands of meaningless posts…wrecking the readability of Goldy’s Blog. Shame on you.
Have you considered an Anger Management Class??
@42 Naaa, execute now and worry about guilt later, that’s how Texas GOP Gov. Rick Perry does it.
44. Chris Stefan spews:
Paying bloated local & State Government workers so they don’t have to be unemployed like the private sector is STIMULUS??
Why not get rid of the Government Workers and give more to the Unemployed?? Why does it matter who gets the handout??
Lame-ass argument…but sadly, I think you truly believe it!
47. Roger Rabbit spews:
Rog, Rog, Rog–
It seems like you really believe what is posted here on HA really matters. C’mon, you aren’t that deluded…are you?
Have it coming? That would imply I really care about anything you say. Seems like the real bottom-line is you are Bevis and the other 3-4 klowns are butthead. That’s it.
Rog, I do not care what you post.
Proud Leftist loves me. He really really loves me. Puddy is shocked!
Chris,
What is a
Puddy knows of a few goat-fucking morons. They are libtardo progressives. And don’t refer to the picture some leftist pinhead used earlier.
BTW remember, ObamaHitler and ObamaJoker were from leftist pinheads.
Really THE DUMB BUNNY? Name them. Don’t post leftist crapola like that Harvard Study being touted by Odumba.
Puddy @ 54
Hey, man, I’ve always told you I’m a lover, not a hater.
@51…strawman alert…
An extremely stupid KLOWN spews: “Have you considered an Anger Management Class??”
No, although you might consider a brain transplant, you mindless piece of shit.
PL says, “His posts have become more and more mindless and repetitive.”
Not only is he dumber than a box of rocks, but despite repeated warnings and numerous deleted posts, he violates copyright law damn near every day. Marvin was banned for far less than that.
Goldy, get rid of the stupid KLOWN.
60
What did Marvin do to get banned?
I would like to present a well-earned STFU AWARD to………..
……the parents of Rachel Corrie….
..please, just STFU already.
@61 Only Darryl really knows. I think it was his doing. I’ve suspected that Marvin finally pissed him off. Marvin had a knack for doing that – he’s the only troll to actually piss me off. heh- But I respect him for that. And he had a few redeeming qualities. The KLOWN? No respect here for someone so utterly brainless and vile. Like I said before, the KLOWN has no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
Wow Proud Leftist@61,
That comment was shocking. You don’t know what Marvin was accused of?
Steve,
Goldy did it!
@64 I do recall there was something odd about that. In fact, I called out Darryl on it when he announced it. The reason he offered, which I don’t recall at the moment, just didn’t add up. Anyways, I’d rather that Marvin was still posting. Perhaps he is and I just haven’t caught on to his new screen name. I figure he could get around the ban easy enough if he really wanted to do so.
Huh? Did what?
You mean to say that Goldy banned Marvin? Perhaps, but I believed at the time that Darryl was behind it. To tell the truth, I figured Marvin had brought up Darryl’s student comments one too many times so Darryl pulled the plug on him.
Steve
Thanks for the link.
Yeah, Darryl said this: “he was banned after admitting in that thread to being a paid troll (which we’ve suspected for many months)”
And @84 I said this: “I seriously doubt that Marvin was paid to troll. And even if he admitted as much, why would Darryl believe him? It seems far more likely that Marvin was just pulling Darryl’s chain.”
heh- Our exchange following @84 was hilarious.
I really find it difficult to imagine anybody paying Marvin to troll here. On the other hand, his sense of humor could easily have led to his claiming to be a paid troll, like I said, to pull Darryl’s chain. So, yeah, I kind of concluded that Goldy, Darryl or whoever, just used this as an excuse to ban him. The only reason I could think of was that Darryl was fed up with Marvin’s repeated references to the negative student comments. And that’s fine. It’s their blog. I would just have prefered a more up-front explanation.
I could understand Darryl’s irritation. Marvin could get me pissed off too. But I eventually started recognizing some decent qualities in him. Then we occasionally talked music at the end of open threads. I enjoyed those conversations. And I admit that I got a kick out of how he went after Darryl, GBS and myself, well, except for the times I got pissed off. I once got so angry at him that I started the process of tracking him down – not a good thing. But I reconsidered and backed off.
Steve,
Stamm seemed to know what he was talking about in the music department. He even claimed to have played with Akiyoshi/Tabackin Big Band which was one cool band, one of my favorites. I tried looking up horn players with the various bands he claimed he toured with but couldn’t pin him down.
However, he was just withering in the troll department – an endless idiot wind of right wing bullshit…
I could barely stand the guy near the end. I don’t miss him. As for the music, well that was one more lost opportunity due to divisive right wing politics.
YLB, I missed the part where Marvin talked about actual bands. But he certainly knew what he was talking about, music-wise.
I don’t mind finding some redeeming quality in a few folks on the other side, not that I’ll ever agree with their right-wing politics. But there’s more to life than just politics. If I can love my girlfriend with her wingnut political views, surely I can find something likable about a few of the wingnuts here.
Gawd, she wanted me to go with her to some kind of a teabagger tax protest in Olympia a few weeks back! What was she thinking?? Thank goodness work offered an excuse, although it might have been interesting. She goes to Republican picnics and such as well. Lord, she probably likes listening to Pudge sing. Sigh! But I love her anyway.
Oh my! Heaven help her!
I once told Pudge at EffU that I found his “music” obnoxious. All he could say more or less was “sure sucks to be you”.. What an ego on that right wing zealot.
Pelosi is yet again in the cesspool!!
From foxnews–
Shame on you Nancy.
This is gonna get ugly.
Nancy allowed a known groper to continue in his seat and continue groping.
Nancy has grope on her hands!!
The Dummocrats keep getting dumber.
No accountability…unless it’s politically expediant.
@75 Remember how Republicans covered for their page chasing pedophile? Remember all the excuses for wingnut toe-tapping in airport toilets? How about wingnuts wanting to pay undercover cops to blow them in park toilets? Of course, you had no problem with all that. Where’s your outrage about Vitter still holding office, as well as all the other sex scandle plagued wingnuts in Congress? When it comes to confronting wingnut moral degenerates you have your head up your ass, as usual. That’s because you’re a low-life, America-hating, fascism-loving hypocritical KLOWN.
Question–
Why did Pelosi LIE about when she knew about Massa’s misconduct?
She said she learned in February…when she actually knew last year!
Reason–
Wanted to avoid a Special Election in a District that would go Republican!
Pelosi is neck-deep in her own lies.
This one ain’t going away.
Covering something up like this is bad.
LYING about it is worse.
Pelosi is in huge trouble.
Now she is saying she cannot meet Obam-Mao’s 3/18 deadline on Health Care.
The Majority of Dems seem to hate her and are afraid of her cuz she is such a vile b*tch.
Oh, shut the fuck up, you dumbfuck KLOWN.
Steve Steve Steve, The FBI determined Foley broke no pedophile laws. PAY ATTENTION! Jake Tapper and ABC News told us so and Puddy placed it on this blog!
Cynical,
Don’t ask, don’t tell so why are DUMMOCRAPTS all up in arms on Massa’s Navy “exploits”? They should be trumpeting Massa’s actions – in de Navy – chorus by De Village People
In the navy
Yes, you can sail the seven seas
In the navy
Yes, you can put your mind at ease
In the navy
Come on now, people, make a stand
In the navy, in the navy
Can’t you see we need a hand
In the navy
Come on, protect the motherland
In the navy
Come on and join your fellow man
In the navy
Come on people, and make a stand
In the navy, in the navy, in the navy (in the navy)
‘1. Roger Rabbit queefs, coughs and wheezes:
Roger Rabbit can’t attend tonight due to illness.’
Translation: Years and years of smoking while cleaning the floors as head janitor at the courthouse has left him attached to an oxygen tank and blood pressure monitor, unable to escape the mental walls of his O.C.D. with this site. Poor old geezer. Bottoms up! :)
Oh, Mr. Cyn-a-bun-Klown @ 77:
What’s a matter? Glenn Beck got you all fired up that there’s gonna be hell to pay for Pelosi?
“What did she know, and when did she know it????”
Think there’s going to be some big investigation do ya?
Bozo, let me set you striaght — right here, right now.
You chimps had your way for a huge chunk of time after Clinton. Your guys fucked up.
2006 you lost control of congress. (I told you so.)
2008 you lost even more control of congress. (I told you so.)
2008 you lost the White House. (I told you so.)
2009 you lost the battle over health care reform when the Dems passed legislation in the Senate. (Again, I told you so.)
2010 you will lose because Obama and the Dems are bringing up Immigration reform again. Last year all the yelling at townhall meetings were about HCR. This summer (hehehehehe) you guys will be screaming about all the “damn ILLEGAL MexiCANS are takin’ our jobs!!”
Yeah, the youth and Latinos will come en masse again sinking any hopes you have of regaining control of the Congress.
This November you know what I’m going to say . . . told ya so.