Better know the 36th Legislative District

In this post (the third in my series on LD redistricting), the topic is still another Seattle-area Legislative District with an open seat. I have a lot of connections with the 36th, not least of which is that my sister and her family live there. Also, as we’ll soon see, my own precinct used to be — but is no longer — right on the border between the 43rd and the 36th.

NOTE: a click on the “Click to continue” link below will open the key to definitions of the meanings of the various colors and other symbols on the maps.

Location – northwest Seattle, from Belltown to Crown Hill
   Senate: Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D), 2014
   House 1: Reuven Carlyle (D)
   House 2: Mary Lou Dickerson (D), retiring

The 36th District is quite compact, and its borders didn’t change very much in the recent redistricting. It still encompasses most of Belltown and all of Queen Anne, Interbay, Magnolia, and Ballard. Like the 43rd to its east, but now unlike the 46th to its northeast, it lies entirely within the city of Seattle. Not only that — the 36th LD is also entirely within Jim McDermott’s Congressional District (WA-07) and entirely within Larry Phillips’s King County Council District (KC-4). The map below displays the 36th District as it was defined on the 2001 map, prior to the recent redistricting. The map’s scale is 60,000:1.

2001 map, 36th LD

2001 map, 36th LD



It is immediately obvious that the new version of the 36th LD is quite similar to the 2001 map. Given the homogeneity of Seattle, and understanding that the LD’s and the city’s population growth was much the same as the state as a whole, there was little reason to make many changes there. We can’t look into the collective mind of the Redistricting Commission, but it appears that they generally chose to concentrate whatever changes took place in Seattle in the redrawn 46th District.

The map of 2011’s 36th District displays the boundaries of the Congressional Districts in its vicinity. Only one of those dashed blue lines is particularly interesting … the small piece of border in the lower right corner of the image. It demonstrates that the edge of WA-07 comes close to the 36th, but doesn’t quite get there. That piece of the CD’s border (WA-09 is southeast of that line) actually separates the 43rd District from the 37th; the core of Seattle is divided among the three LDs.

2011 map, 36th LD

2011 map, 36th LD



The great similarity between the 2001 and 2011 maps of the 36th Legislative District is quite evident when the two are superimposed on one another. Except for some very slight rejiggering in Belltown, the alterations consist of losing its portion of Fremont (to the 43rd) and gaining those parts of Greenwood and Phinney Ridge (from the 46th) that weren’t already in the District. The new 36th might possibly be a wee bit less Democratic than the old one — the western hillside of Fremont might be a tad bluer than the eastern hillside of Phinney Ridge — but there will be little change in the political nature of the LD. It remains a solidly Democratic bastion.

As a Fremont resident myself, I’m happy to see the new boundaries. Under the 2001 map, my precinct was smack-dab on the line between the 43rd and 36th, and at least one of the first-draft redistricting maps would have moved the border eastward, thereby transferring me into the 36th. Instead, the new 43rd covers 14 precincts that are home to quite a few former stalwarts of the 36th District Democrats, including a former LD chair and nearly half a dozen former Executive Board members of the old 36th. My precinct is now well inside the boundaries of the 43rd Legislative District, which extends around 10 blocks to my west.

2001 and 2011, 36th LD

2001 and 2011, 36th LD



When Mary Lou Dickerson decided to relinquish her House seat, a crowd of aspirants arose immediately. Of the seven declared candidates, one is a self-declared Progressive, one is a Republican (Paulista, actually), and the other five are Democrats. Sounds pretty typical for this solid blue LD.

There is general agreement among the Democrats on the issues. So perhaps the crux of the matter will come down to the candidates’ personal backstories. In alphabetical order, the Democrats are:

  • Evan Clifthorne, legislative staffer for Senator Paull Shin (D-21) and native Washingtonian
  • Sahar Fathi, staffer for Seattle City Councilmember Mike O’Brien and Iranian-American woman
  • Noel Frame, state director of Progressive Majority, former campaign manager, native Washingtonian
  • Brett Phillips, green building/energy efficiency expert, son of County Councilmember Larry Phillips, native of the 36th District
  • Gael Tarleton, Port of Seattle Commissioner and national security analyst

In a very real sense, this election reminds me of the 2006 open-seat House race here in the 43rd. Back then, we had six excellent Democrats competing for the seat then held by Ed Murray, who was running for the State Senate. In that primary, Jamie Pederson won the Democratic nomination with just 23% of the vote. One difference between then and now is that in 2006 we were temporarily operating under the sensible Open Primary, Private Choice methodology (called Pick-a-Party by Sam Reed) rather than the ridiculous Top Two favored by the inane majority among us. Thus, winning the Democratic primary was tantamount to winning the general election. There was a Republican primary as well in 2006, wherein the winner drew far fewer votes than the sixth-place Democrat … but appeared on the November ballot.

There was no hint of negative campaigning in our 2006 primary in the 43rd. I’ve detected a hint of non-collegiality in the 36th, though there hasn’t been anything close to real mud-slinging. Perhaps the large number of candidates has prevented a repeat of the 36th’s ugly two-way 2008 race. Races actually, since the Top Two forced it to carry over from the primary to the general election. When there are lots of near-equivalent choices available, it wouldn’t be sensible to alienate any of the electorate. Assuming that two of the Democratic candidates will continue on to the November ballot, could the gloves come off post-primary? We’ll see…

Key to symbology in the LD maps

All Legislative District maps in this series share a number of characteristics in common:

  • Each of the maps of the specified LD shows exactly the same geographic area, in a scale that’s appropriate for such a display. I’ll report that scale within the text of the post.
  • County names are displayed as ALL-CAPS BLACK ITALICS, and their borders are shown as heavy black lines.
  • Precinct boundaries are gray lines.
  • Red lines are major roads, generally Interstate, Federal, and State highways.
  • As you’d expect, bodies of water are shown as blue areas.
  • The blue “dot in square” symbols represent cities and towns, with the names of larger communities displayed in a font of the same color.

For the first map of a given Legislative District — the region within the 2001 boundaries of the LD — add the following:

  • The 2001 version of the LD is shaded in a pink/purple color.
  • Where the LD borders cover bodies of water, the LD area is just purple.

The second map in the series for the LD — its new extent under the 2011 redistricting — adds the following to the characteristics common to all maps:

  • The 2011 version of the Legislative District is displayed as a green region.
  • Liquid portions of the LD are shown in a slightly different shade of green.
  • On this map, the LD is labeled in LARGE BLACK CAPS. There’s also something of a white highlighting on the LD label.
  • This map also displays the borders of the new Congressional Districts, marked by thick dashed blue lines. The CDs are labeled in GREEN ITALICS, as “WA-x“.

The third map of the LD superimposes its 2011 and 2001 boundaries. To eliminate a bit of clutter, the Congressional District borders aren’t shown on this one. In this map:

  • Territory lost in redistricting (within the LD in 2001, but not in 2011) is shaded in the same pink/purple color that we saw in the first of the three maps.
  • Areas that have been added to the LD in the redistricting (not part of the LD in 2001, within the LD in 2011) appear in the same green shading found in the second map.
  • Where the two LD boundaries coincide (within the LD in both the 2001 and 2011 maps), that region is shaded brown.

Comments

  1. 1

    Puddybud spews:

    N,

    Why not ask them if they agree with the latest in DUMMOCRAPT thought…

    American Public Schools Should Be Modeled After Madrassas

    That should shake out the riff from the raff.

  2. 3

    spews:

    @2:

    In general, I agree. But I think it’s somewhat useful to leave the delirious ravings of that clearly delusional individual out there for all to see.

  3. 4

    Puddybud spews:

    How is that off topic or delusional? It was said by a prominent national DUMMOCRAPT! Do they agree with national DUMMOCRAPTIC thought on public schools?

  4. 7

    spews:

    Translating the crazy guy:

    Andre Carson, a back-bencher in the House of Representatives from Indiana, is the second Muslim Congressman (the most excellent Keith Ellison of Minnesota is, of course, the first). In May, he gave a speech to a Muslim educational group, in which he mused about the different “styles” of learning — visual, auditory, and such — and also told the group what they wanted to hear, that a Muslim educational model might have some value.

    The crazy-ass websites that Puddy drools over went faux-batshit about Mr. Carson’s offhand remarks.

    For the record, Congressman Carson attended such madrassas as Arsenal Technical High School in Indianapolis, Concordia University-Wisconsin (bachelors degree in Criminal Justice Management), and Indiana Wesleyan University (M.B.A.). FWIW, Concordia is a Catholic school and Indiana Wesleyan is, well, Wesleyan.

  5. 8

    spews:

    As it happens, we’re in the middle of candidate answers for the 36th district. So far only Gael has answered (here) but there’s still time for the other candidates to get their answers in.

  6. 9

    spews:

    Oh, also, is there any reason the water is different? I assume that doesn’t make a difference to any house boats, etc.

  7. 10

    spews:

    @9:

    Are you talking about those purple areas in Puget Sound? I have no idea why they didn’t just keep those unoccupied areas the same.

    Sure, every square inch of the state has to be in an LD. But does it really matter where the hypothetical LD lines are drawn in large bodies of water?

  8. 11

    future engineer spews:

    Maybe I’m just being a one note singer, but so far I’d prefer it if Gael Tarleton won. She’s been a Port Commissioner for years, and she would (I hope) bring some of that knowledge and expertise with her to the legislature. The state, much like the city, has no industrial or commercial policy to speak of, outside of throwing tax breaks at Boeing and hoping that we get to keep our airplane factories.

    It was recently asserted, and I tend to agree with this statement, that the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, and Everett are in actuality the ports of Washington. Someone has got to make clear to the legislators from Back East that it will hurt them and their constituents if there is a drop-off in trade at any of these ports. When container ships bringing finished goods from China dock in Seattle, the captains want something to put in their holds for the trip back; a ship with an empty hold is a ship that’s earning losses, and farmers have benefited by these captains’ willingness to load up Eastern Washington apples and grain.

    The Port of Prince Rupert up in Canada does well because it is heavily subsidized. Rather than whine about how the Canadians are cheating, we should start pitching in money ourselves, to improve the port and give shippers a reason to keep sending their product here, instead of sending it to Savannah once the Panama Canal gets widened.

  9. 12

    Deana Cruell spews:

    American women are quite nice and pretty. Most american women are very educated and they might also be somewhat dominating over men .`*`.