Officers on the police scanner say that a would-be vigilante flagged down a cop near Cowen Park. The man was carrying a handgun and wearing body armor. He apparently wanted help flush out the suspect from the park.
There’s a part of me that wishes the police had put his armor to the test.
The person wanting to help a cop find a suspect doesn’t scare me as much as the person that wants what I have and hasn’t figured out that voting for democrats is the legal way to do it.
@1
The guy sounds a little unbalanced to me. And I think recent history shows really well that unbalanced people shouldn’t have access to firearms.
Hey kids it’s time for Crooked Republican Of The Week! This weeks winner is former Idaho congressman George Hansen.
Jeeze. I walked through Cowen Park twice today.
At lunchtime I hard about the award being offered, and visions of hundreds of hunters, drinking beer and carrying hunting rifles, scouring the parks and backyards of their neighborhoods, came to mind. I can see it now…
Hunter: “I shot the cop killer! Give me the reward!”
Gunshot Victim: “I’m not the cop killer! I was in my back yard pruning my trees and you just shot me!”
Hunter: Shut up! I know you are the cop killer! You look just like him! You’re black, aren’t you????”
Anybody else remember the original Rambo movie, First Blood? The part where the national guardsmen are out in the woods, hunting for Rambo?
Is it here? No, not there.
Here? Not there, either.
Where are the posts about the hoax that is Man-made Global Warming????
#1 – LOL
Typical anti-reality Republican nut. Thinks there’s this magical fantasy land where they voted for Saint Reagan and there were NO taxes, and government didn’t exist…but then (sniff) Democrats got in power and took everyone’s money!
You live in a cute nutty fantasy, like all wingnuts. I don’t know what drugs you’re on, but I remember paying (within a percentage point or two) the same income tax under Reagan, Carter, Bush H.W., Clinton and Bush W, and now (waiting for 2009 tax table) likely Obama.
You’re crazy. Republicans take JUST as much as Democrats wingnut. Just what ‘government’ are Republicans going to get rid of? You want to INCREASE military spending (find me ANY Republican candidate that proposes to slash the military budget). So that leaves only Medicare and social security, which Republicans claim to want to ‘protect’. So what are you going to slash to keep the evil gov’ment from “taking” your money? LOL
By the way, they’re not “taking” it from you, you’re being charged for services (whether you want them or not). That nuclear aircraft carrier you want protect you? You have to pay taxes for that. The roads, bridges, street lights, police, fire, schools, FBI, CIA, NSA, FDA, NASA…all popular with one group or another. So you pay for it. You paid for it under Reagan and you paid for it under Clinton. Maybe you don’t want to fund NASA, and I didn’t want to fund the Iraq war…but we elect our leaders and if you don’t like it, vote for someone else. We’re taxed roughly the same no MATTER who gets in office, Republican or Democrat. Stop the crazy.
@7 that would be off topic…
@ everybody else. Guess what gun lovers. If said vigilante encounters the suspect running away and shoots and the suspect is 100% guilty and unarmed, said vigilante can and probably will be prosecuted for aggravated assault. If the suspect dies, well then we have pre-meditated murder.
Please folks, the police and military are professionals. Let them handle it. I have a cousin on that hunt right now. Be careful out there Lt. Mike!
I can’t get too excited about this. Who knows, he may even find Mr. Clemmons. What’s one less gun-waving wingnut jackass?
Yeah, what #9 said.
@1 You can keep your money, but I want you to refund the full monetary value of everything you’ve gotten from government, starting with the cost of securing and maintaining your freedom from the Revolutionary War forward.
@8 “Republicans take JUST as much as Democrats”
They take more. It’s well known that blue states are net paying states and red states are net receiving states.
Wishing the death of a harmless stranger, you sure keep it classy around here!
Harmless strangers wear body armor and wave guns around?
And besides, Goldy wasn’t wishing the guys death. He just thought it would be kindly of the police to give him a chance to tryout his body armor. Your taxpayers dollars in action.
@14 The guy isn’t harmless, given the odds of him shooting an innocent person, and given that he’s interfering with the police search. Where’s your common sense?
Protecting Family Values
A Californian has started an initiative campaign to ban divorce in that state, as a protest against of Prop. 8 that outlawed gay marriage, the Associated Press reports. Its promoter argues a divorce ban “is needed to protect the sanctity of traditional marriage.”
http://news.aol.com/article/mo.....ban/790834
@1 genius
Roger Rabbit, king of posts unrelated to the thread…bravo ol’poop.
@19 At least I’m capable of an original thought. Can’t say the same for you.
“He just thought it would be kindly of the police to give him a chance to tryout his body armor. ”
I was thinking about this when there was all the discussion about Sarah Palin being in favor of wolf hunts by helicopter.
I don’t have a thing against hunters. Some of my best friends are hunters. I just think that when we talk about hunting wolves, we should even the odds so its a REAL sport. No helicopters, snow mobiles, or vehicles of any kind. No guns. You can carry with you a knife no longer than a wolve’s fangs.
Now THAT would even the odds! I wonder how many of those sporting guys would want to go on wolf hunds then!
doesn’t this guy know the police have a monopoly on “security” and prematurely dispensing justice?
@21
I have issues with people who claim to love and care about nature, but don’t want a complete eco-system that is able to regulate its self. That’s what wolves do. They keep the ungulate populations in check. And they are amazingly cool to listen too and you’re one lucky some’ bitch if you get to see them in the wild. I’ve never seen them in the wild.
I also have issues with people who think hunting means driving around in your pickup truck until you see a deer or elk and then getting out and blasting away at it. I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve heard alleged hunters empty their magazines at whatever they were shooting at.
Shooting a wolf (or anything else) from a plane isn’t hunting.
The rest of the hunters and there are quite a few of them are some really cool folks.
An aol link.
hahahahahahahahahahaha
@1 Boy, are you ever a wuss.
@8 Let’s not forget the “taking away” of most of our industry to China and elsewhere, siphoning trillions of dollars into foreign banks and devaluing the bejeezus out of however many any of us can earn back here.
Might be something to keep in mind on the heels of the 10th anniversary of the “battle of Seattle”. Turns out some of those protesters might have had a valid point.
re 24: AOL links are not the point of the comment.
The point is that you and your ilk are meddling, inchoate nipple-heads.
Hey Roger Dumb Bunny, you admitted yesterday Clemmons wasn’t a wing nut. Looks like you forgot already. Proves you have moronic mindless memory malady.
@28
Rog was talking about the idiot in Seattle with the body armor and the handgun, not Clemmons. We don’t know that he’s a wing-nut either, but the behavior does have a Glenn Beck-ish flavor to it.
I always come here to read how Republicans play out their textbook when they get hoisted on their own petard.
1. If you think that a gun will protect you from someone shooting at you, can you say “Fort Hood”? How about “Lakewood”? Four armed, heavily trained police officers got executed by a single gunman in seconds by a machine gun.
Most of today’s high end handguns hold 15 or more rounds and have extremely low recoil. A person trained for 30 minutes could empty 15 rounds in less than 5 seconds. Such a weapon, by definition of Websters, is an engine. Therefore, a machine gun.
2. Who would have thought on Saturday that Mike Huckabee would lose his 2012 presidential bid in Lakewood, WA in 2009?
3. No, when the shit hits the fan, like it did in Lakewood, you do not get to turn into an independent for a couple of weeks while the smoke blows over. This is another failure of Republican politics, bought and paid for by the NRA, set loose by a Republican Governor.
Us dumbass liberals predicted that overcrowding prisons with non violent consensual crime offenders would cause the release of violent criminals.
Fuck you Republicans, told you so.
@28 Is there some reason why you reference only half of my comment yesterday, and left out the part where Clemmons was put back on the streets by a Republican governor and presidential candidate?
@30 “Us dumbass liberals predicted that overcrowding prisons with non violent consensual crime offenders would cause the release of violent criminals.”
We also predicted the rabid anti-tax politics of the wipeass right would force cash-strapped states to release dangerous criminals from prisons.
#32
“You say Potayto… I say Potahto, you say Tomayto..I say Tomahto
Why don’t we call the whole hypocritical Republican fiasco off”
Not really.
Republicans are the party of being tough on crime.
This was a failure of a republican politician that didn’t follow republican principles.
@34 It’s been 50 years since any Republican politician has followed Republican principles, which is why the Republican Party is dying.
@34
Republicans were the party of being tough on crime. I’m not sure WTF they are now.
Note my post @ 3 about the ex-Republican congressman.
Jonathan Alter, writing in Newsweek, offers an interesting theory that Palin, Dobbs, and Beck — people he calls “Foxulists” (a contraction of “Faux Populists”) — are ambitious to have their own talk shows, not sit in the White House, and they’re all vying for Nielsen ratings, not votes.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/182970
34, 36 — Here’s a Nixon-era joke that was good for laughs back in the sixties, and still is:
“Nixon promised to get crime off the streets. And by golly he did! He took crime off the streets and put it in the White House.”
@33 If we wait a little while, I’ll think they’ll do it for us.
‘Oh shit Rog, there go your stock dividends!
@40 There goes the state’s sales tax revenues, too!
Dumb Bunny,
Why? Because Mike Huckabee was trying to give a person who created his crimes as a juvie a second chance. Now Puddy realizes second chances are something unknown to Roger Dumb Bunny, Puddy guesses you can figger it out. So all that crap you posted even afterwards was worthless blather. Puddy looking at Pierce County Judge and why did he do what he did.
@41
Hell, the politicians are just going to hand our hard earned money over to corporate welfare queens anyway. Might as well barter.
@43 Yeah, no shit. There’s a very disturbing article in Newsweek about how Wall Street firms that sold crap to municipal fund managers are now collecting billions in “termination fees” from bankrupt cities like Detroit as the price of getting out of these toxic investments. Wall Street should be shot! Just rip up the whole street, line it up against a wall, and shoot it!
@42 Is Mike Huckabee gonna give those dead cops a second chance, too? The Arkansas prosecutor who put this animal away thought Huck was nuts to release him. Oh, and don’t forget — Huck’s kid lynched a dog.
Oh for christ’s sake. MISTER PuddyBuddy would be the VERY FIRST to jump down the throat of a Democratic governor who released a person like this. THE VERY FIRST! What a godddamned hypocrite. Just ’cause the holy Huckafool panders to the religionists he’s okee dokee with colsandersfavoritechicken.
@46 “godddamned hypocrite”
You’ve outed the pudster, all right.
@42
Puddy, just stop. You’re an idiont. Sure, second chances are good. Why, when the suspect (keep in mind the constitution) viloated parole was he not tossed back in jail? If he turns out to be the guy, how did he end up in WA to start with?
Check out this. Sheds some light on what might be going on. Of course, updating Washington’s ancient (1970s in computer terms might as well be 1400s England) criminal justice computer network will require some spending..errr…tax dollars.
http://www.mynorthwest.com/ind.....sid=201537
Alki Postings – Wingers are delusional skinflints who demand services, expect to get them for nothing, and then resent the system when the bill comes due. Remember when Eyman was busted for taking his garbage to the Post Office? Had no shame over it at all. He just shrugged and explained that he was a good customer, so he deserved a little extra service!!! Yeah, like “would you like free garbage disposal with those stamps?” Never heard a peep from any wingnut over that–as if it were a perfectly okay practice to mooch off of the Post Office.
Their entitled attitude shows up on the big scale, too. Bush charged the costs of an entire war, and kept it off the books–as if the money were never spent. And he still managed to run up a deficit of historic proportions based on his profligate discretionary spending. No matter. That inconvenient truth hasn’t stopped the wingnuts from continuing to insist that the Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility.
To be a wingnut requires a truly impressive ability to ignore the facts that don’t support your ideology.
Um, I think it was one of these frat boys:
Student Vigilante Group Armed With Guns Searching For Bad Guys Near UW Campus
http://www.q13fox.com/news/kcp.....8624.story
checksaid farts:
When Clemmons “violated” parole and was thrown back in jail, prosecutors didn’t file charges in a timely matter and the charges were dropped and he was let go.
You see there is a big difference between Willie Horton being loosed by Dukakis and how Huckabee released Clemmons. Yet you HA Libtardos don’t want to acknowledge it. The public record is there for all to see, how Clemmons sentence reduction was judge and parole board approved before it went to Huckabee. Sure in hindsight Clemmons should have stayed in jail. You HA Libtardos especially the moronic ones like rujax couldn’t determine facts when they are cinder blocks all around you. Are you a cinder block too checksaid? Well you did have your Mike Rogers moment :).
Well, a Seattle cop shot and killed the suspect about three hours ago, so we won’t have to fund a trial or a long prison sentence for the suspect. Now they’re concentrating on getting his friends and family that helped him evade capture. Hopefully those folks will get to be “guests” of the state for quite a while.
As far as Huckabee and the Pierce County judges go, maybe it’s OK to give lengthy sentences to young offenders and maybe it’s OK to not grant bail for a felon with this guy’s record.
@51
Oh Puddy…
Going to Willie Horton. Look up some facts. The Massachusettes furlough program was put in place BEFORE Dukakis was in office. (started 1972.)
Key difference between Dukakis and Huckabee. Dukakis never had any input over the decision to grant Horton a furlough, he just happened to be unfortunate enough to be in office when it was granted. Clemmons was free AS A DIRECT RESULT of the carefully considerated decision of Mike Huckabee.
Suck on that FACT, asshole!
A few more Willie Horton facts:
1) The original law did not grant furlough rights to criminals sentenced to life without parole.
2) The Mass Supreme Court ruled that the exclusion of criminals sentenced to life without parole was unconstitutional.
3) The Mass State Legislature passed a law that put the life sentence restriction back in place.
4) Then Gov. Dukakis vetoed the bill to put the life sentence restriction back in place.
5) The primary issue behind Dukakis’ veto was the constitutionality of the legislature’s attempt to put the restriction back into the law.
6) All of this happened 10 years before Willie Horton was released on the furlough program.
7) In those intervening 10 years, the Mass State Legislature did nothing to craft a law that would have passed constitutional muster yet restricted the furlough program to criminals not sentenced to life without parole.
Now, the Puddy Parade of Partial Punditry will be quick to point out some of the above facts, but will not ever admit that all of them are true. Puddy only remembers those facts that are convenient for Puddy to remember.
Hey Don Joe,
Go jump on Steve’s goat and grind on it dude. Get some pleasure, because your mind is reading things Puddy didn’t say. All Puddy said was there were big differences between Horton and Clemmons. It’s you HA Libtardos who are trying to assimilate the two. Huckabee wrongly was trying to give a black juvie a second chance. Horton was a cold hardened criminal. That’s the big difference lost on HA Liberal Retards.
Checksaid,
Sorry it’s your HA Libtardo peeps who suck on ASSholes. That’s not Puddy’s style so don’t project your nightly acts on Puddy.
As Puddy just stated to Don Joe, there are differences between Horton and Clemmons. You liberal retards can’t and don’t want to see the real record of Clemmons, it’s just a political attack. And you fools forget it wasn’t Lee Atwater who first delivered Willie Horton to the public, so go fuck Steve’s goat fool!
12. Roger Rabbit spews:
Marvin..
Rog sits there bitterly sucking oxygen from his oxygen tank thinking up stuff like this and working himself up into a frenzy about it.
This is why I call him a KLOWN!
KLOWNS like Rog are the real danger to our American Way of life.
Bitter, jealous & envious of anyone successful…expecially of guys like Puddy who dare get off the Plantation and work his ass off and provide a great life and opportunities for his family.
41. Roger Rabbit spews:
Most of these Barter Groups are Leftist Progressive invented.
They are TAX CHEATERS like Rangel & Geithner!
@All Puddy said was there were big differences between Horton and Clemmons.
Yeah, because Horton was used against a democrat while you don’t want Clemmons used against a republican.
@42. Because Mike Huckabee was trying to give a person who created his crimes as a juvie a second chance. Once again another double standard. You conservatives rail against second chances and reformation when it’s a democratic initiative, but when a republican gets in hot water for giving someone a second chance, that deserves a pass. Be consistent.
@56
Wow puddy. Standard Motiff. Caught being the butt-boy for Huckabee. (Well, gotta find a way to spin this, he’s a righty afterall.) All you’ve got left is vulgarity and name calling.
See, that’s why you’re an asshole. (That’s only the second time I’ve typed that word here.)
Fugitive cop-killer Maurice Clemmons has been killed by a Seattle police officer.
@59 Wow.
You want to read some savaging, the free republicers are destroying the huckster (their term, not mine),
http://www.freerepublic.com/fo.....7079/posts
Puddy loves how the liberal retard class loves to keep skipping over what Puddy said. Puddy already addressed the Huckabee issue earlier. Ask the dog-faced clown ylb arschloch for the comment. He’ll produce it trying to make Puddy look bad and fail again of course. Or you liberal retards can ask ylb arschloch to produce it yourselves.
Now onto checksaid… Butt boy for Huckabee? Standard Motif…? You mean like you are a butt boy for Mmmm Mmmm Mmmm? You butt boyed his CZARS. You butt boyed the Porkulus bill. You butt boyed his Iran strategy. Yep you are the REAL butt boy checksaid.
Huckabee not my candidate. Go check with ylb arschloch for the historical facts. Go on ask him checksaid… Be the first to have ylb arschloch dig into his database archive. He’s a real liberal retard like you only he’s a dumb brick. Grow some mar-buls and ask him to reproduce the comments. Huckabee not a deep down real conservative.
Besides Puddy is always trying to support my peeps. Unfortunately Clemmons is a habitual criminal. Did you forget all the PuddyPosts on my peeps fool?. Even Roger Dumb Bunny acknowledged Clemmons wasn’t swayed by conservative ideals. Clemmons had a choice and he continued in his “liberal progressive ways”. Take from those who have and use it for himself… Yep those are liberal ideals.
BULLSHITTIUM Alert Blew John BULLSHITTIUM Alert
Sorry Blew John you don’t get the Star Trek Klaxon horn as that’s only reserved for Roger Dumb Bunny…
Puddy always sticks up for his peeps. Puddy very consistent on this fact. Other HA Liberal Retards have commented on how Puddy is passionate for my peeps.
You Blew John have moronic mindless memory malady. You need to grow some mar-buls and ask ylb arschloch to display how Puddy always stands up for his peeps. Puddy upset at the Poverty Pimps Jackson and Sharpton. They never come out and say anything when a black does wrong. Yet you all are butt boys for Jackson and Sharpton while Puddy is very consistent on this too!
Puddy–
These KLOWNS start with the premise “blame Republicans” and then ignore or twist facts to do so.
You have done a fine job, as usual, of laying out the facts…
and the KLOWNS have done their usual hatchet-job attempt to no avail.
Here is how effective they are Puddy–
Tuesday, December 01, 2009
They have lost all political capital and are at the bottom looking up in 10 months…just as we predicted!!
They are immoral, ignorant shit-stirrers.
That’s all they can do.
Certainly they cannot lead.
@40, Course, since he’s in the paper and on record, he has to declare the value of those on his federal and state taxes at the end of the year.
@65. I’m a bad mood today, so I’ll vent.
They have lost all political capital and are at the bottom looking up in 10 months…just as we predicted!!
Today, I agree with you, but not for the reasons you think. I wanted progressive change, I wanted the dems to grow a spine, and enact meaningful legislation that would keep jobs here, grow jobs here, and pass robust health care reform. I wanted them to make changed to help grow the middle class.
What I am getting is republican lite. If the elections were held today, I’d for anyone else in the primary and if they still one that, vote a republican ticket to get the cowardly democrats out and get in some new blood with a spine in the next cycle. I’d even vote for Palin.
@67 Where is the !@#$!@#$ edit button. What I meant was “… and if they still won that, vote a …”
@64 They let you have a klaxon horn without a permit?
Gotta love Puddy’s latest whinge. If I’m pointing out facts that Puddy has ignored, then I am, most certainly, talking about things Puddy has never said. That’s the entire substance of the Puddy Parade of Partial Punditry. Puddy only brings up some of the facts, never all of the facts. Though, frankly, it’s good for Puddy to at least back-handedly admit to giving short shrift to some of the facts.
It is curious, however, how Puddy would completely discount the role that the Mass State Legislature played in the release of Willie Horton while also ignoring that Huckabee’s clemency decision was entirely an act of the executive branch of the Ark state government. Neither the legislature nor the courts were involved in Huckabee’s decision.
As I said, Puddy only remembers facts that are convenient for Puddy to remember. When it comes to inconvenient facts, Puddy starts coughing up memory parity errors.
@67 John, what you need to understand is we’re still a two-party country, but both major parties are part of the Democratic Party now. We know a Democrat was elected president in 2008, but we’re not sure yet which Democratic Party he’s from. Same goes for Congress.
@70 I’ve noticed that puddy suffers from Selective Memory Syndrome. Maybe he didn’t read the warning label on his klaxon horn.
Fool AKA Don Joe,
You are focused on Willie Horton while Puddy was telling the liberal retards there are differences between Horton and Clemmons. Clemmons was a juvie. That’s all Puddy was saying why Huckabee looked at his case.
Butt, as always, Don Joe wants to make this a discussion about his intellect and his causes. Puddy ain’t going the Don Joe. Don’s Dullest Diatribes work on liberal returds (Spelled correctly) but are skipped by Puddy. Puddy staying on the topic of why liberal returds like you try to take the train onto other tracks so you can make insipid points.
The rest of Don Joe’s rant is ignored. No relevance and partially incorrect.
Funniest comment of the day
From the Dumb Bunny who makes excuses for his own forgetfulness. You bring a nanosecond smile to Puddy’s face Roger Dumb Bunny.
Well Mmmm Mmmm Mmmm told everyone he’s a centrist moderate Democratic. Butt we all see he’s a way out whackamole libtardo progressive.
Butt we all see he’s a way out whackamole libtardo progressive. He’s not a progressive, lord I wished he was.
@73 “Puddy was telling the liberal retards there are differences between Horton and Clemmons.”
Yeah. Clemmons murdered 4 times as many people as Horton did.
“Clemmons was a juvie.”
He was convicted on adult charges in adult court and sent to adult prison, jackass.
“That’s all Puddy was saying why Huckabee looked at his case.”
Huck must not have looked very hard, because at that point, Clemmons had 5 felony convictions; had threatened a judge; had assaulted a court bailiff; and repeatedly had been arrested on weapons charges. Any idiot who spent 5 minutes looking at his file could have seen this guy was both crazy and dangerous.
@63
Ahh…the circle is complete. Puddy’s other standard motiff.
“I didn’t say that.” The record clearly shows you defending Huckabee.
Lots of irrelevent. (Not My Candidate, MMM..MMM..MMM, Czers, you turned to Czars for justification of your idiocy.)
http://tinyurl.com/no5knk
From the article “List of 2008 homicides in Seattle” from the Seattle PI
selected from the list of the 28 Seattle homicides in 2008….
Allen Joplin, Jan. 4 — black killed by black
De’Che Morrison, Jan. 10 — black killed by black
Maurice “Moe” Allen Jr., Jan. 26 — black killed by black
Degene Barecha, Jan. 30 — black killed by black
Perry Henderson, Feb. 6 — black killed by black
Stephan Dwaine Stewart, April 2 — black killed by black
Eldora Earlycutt, July 4 — black killed by black
James Paroline, July 10 — white killed by black
Troy Peters, July 22 — black killed by black
Pierre Lapoint, Aug. 5 — black killed by black
Jane Kariuki, Oct. 16 — woman of unknown race killed by black man named Christel D. Murphy
Quincy S. Coleman, Oct. 31 — black killed by black
Edward McMichael, the “Tuba Man”, Nov. 3 — white killed by multiple blacks
Nathaniel Lee Thomas, Nov. 23 — black killed by black
So by my count blacks (8% of Seattle) were the killers in at least half (that’s at least 50%) of the murders in the Seattle area in 2008. At least five of the other murderers were latinos.
The numbers are actually worse for 2009 and approach the 85% mark.
@79
I call bullshit. ‘Cause you assume things that you can’t prove. All I had to do was look at your first case. Allen Joplin, black victim. Shooter unidentified and witnesses haven’t come forward and NONE of your links indicate his race. But it’s a gang shooting so he MUST be black right.
One of your links on Joplin tells the story of De’Che Morrison. He was found dead on the street the morning AFTER he was killed. ZERO witness, ZERO suspects. But you KNOW the shooter was black right. I mean it happened in the CD. Only blacks go to the CD, right? I think it’s actually in the Seattle charter.
Where fool? Keep digging for Mike Rogers!!!!
Hey czechsaaz, you know what? You are right.
There is a huge 6% (six percent) chance that the killers of those blacks were not black. (At least 94% of all blacks murdered in the USA are murdered by other blacks)
I should give them the benefit of the doubt. They were probably killed by Swedes or Indian software engineers.
That 6% chance of being a non-black makes a huge difference!!!!!
Wow…you’re a real shithead aren’t you…
Wow, you are an naive politically-correct wimp who can’t face up to the facts , aren’t you?
Puddy, again, why you’re laughed at. You didn’t defend Huckabee. Let’s go to the tape…
@ 42 (in THIS THREAD even)
“Because Mike Huckabee was trying to give a person who created his crimes as a juvie a second chance.”
@51
“You see there is a big difference between Willie Horton being loosed by Dukakis and how Huckabee released Clemmons. Yet you HA Libtardos don’t want to acknowledge it. The public record is there for all to see, how Clemmons sentence reduction was judge and parole board approved before it went to Huckabee.”
Now you can, in your addled brain, think that these statements mean you were not defending Huckabee. Go for it. Try. What did you mean by these statements if not trying to justify Huckabee’s actions? Your own words Puddy.
@81 – Puddy is a LIAR, Q.E.D.
Hey czechsaaz, are you still “calling bullshit”?
Remember, you have a HUGE 6% chance that the killers were not black!
Nope…I’m just not a motherfucking misanthropic racist asshole, that’s all.
@86
Yes. Your statistical analysis continues to prove you don’t understand probability. Your analysis is scientifically unsound AKA bullshit.
czechsaaz – “Your statistical analysis continues to prove you don’t understand probability. Your analysis is scientifically unsound AKA bullshit.”
Please explain WHY my analysis is “scientifically unsound”. 94% of all blacks murdered in the USA are murdered by other blacks. Therefore, there is statistically only a 6% chance that the killers of those blacks you mentioned weren’t black. Also, there is just common-sense about reality (which is something that people who are not naive PC dumbasses possess). The neighborhoods they lived in were majority black and the crowds they hung with were ALL black.
Therefore, I feel entirely confident in saying that blacks were the murders in those cases.
Care to make a bet? I will seriously bet you $100 that the murderers will turn out to be black if these crimes are solved. This is a real offer. You could make $200!!!! You have a whole 6% chance!!!
Are you seriously trying to claim that blacks did not commit all those murders? If so, then you are a naive politically correct dumbass who denies the facts about reality.
Hey! I’ll even throw you a bone with those two dead blacks. Let’s pretend they weren’t actually killed by blacks! So subtract two off the list!
That still means that blacks, who make up only 8% of Seattle, committed almost half the murders there in 2008.
I am willing to bet serious money that the black-committed murder rate in 2009 in Seattle is over 80%.
Care to take me up on these bets????
Hey where did you awesome debaters go? Why don’t you want to take me up on my bets?
Should be some easy money for you right????
Hey! Did you guys run out of insults, or did you finally realize that insults can’t do shit in the face of indisputable facts????
Where did you naive white Seattle PC wimps go????
@85, What a fool checksaid is. Providing facts is defending someone.
Wow checksaid you know how to stretch the word defense. You better run to the urban dictionary.
“That still means that blacks, who make up only 8% of Seattle, committed almost half the murders there in 2008.”
And your point is what?
My point is that “czechsaaz” is DEAD WRONG for “calling bullshit” on the indisputable truth.
The subtext is that it is TOTAL BULLSHIT for blacks to complain about “racial profiling”.
Racial profiling MAKES PERFECT SENSE for a group that makes up only 8% of Seattle but commits at least half (or more) of the murders there every single year. DUH!!!!!!!
Then you’re probably not against political and racial profiling of pedophiles, seeing as how most of them are white male Republicans.
http://www.republicanoffenders.com/Pedophiles.html
And I take it that profiling white male Republicans who rent panda costumes is a good idea too.
Actually, blacks are at least 7 times more likely than whites to abuse children, according to the US Department of Justice. Nice try. And I don’t give a shit about Republicans since I am not one.
@87…sure rujax…your just a bigoted hater of christians – but THAT kind of bigotry is OK with you – in fact I am sure you enjoy those late nights of painting swastikas on church doors…
This Clemmons negro was a pedophile (he raped a female child) but he was neither white nor Republican.
Puddy…Too infantile to bother responding. (“Waaahhhhh, I didn’t defend Huck, I didn’t, I DIDN’T, DIDN’T!) See Puddy M.O. #3
Facts…
Sure I’ll take your bet. Feel free to obsessively check the blotters and let me know when they solve the case of De’Che. If I wanted to check your whole list of black on black crimes, since the first two were fake “evidence,” following your rules of analysis, logic I can assume that 80% your cases are inconclusive. 100% of the first 20% were fake, so I can jump to a made-up conclusion.
Did you really use the words “indisputable proof?” So….Uh…You have proof that your first two murders were committed by blacks? (No, high degree of likelihood is NOT proof. That damn probability again.
feel free to continue being a naive white idiot apologist for black criminals
Are you fucking kidding me????
You actually think that those 2 blacks WERE NOT killed by other blacks?
Are you totally retarded?
If you actually believe that they were not killed by other blacks then you are the most willfully naive, self-deluded politically-correct white-guilt wimp Seattle liberal progressive that ever lived.
Why do naive wimpy white-guilt liberals fall all over themselves to defend black murderers and rapists?