HorsesAss.Org

  • Home
  • About HA
  • Advertise
  • Archives
  • Donate

“The David Goldstein Show” tonight on 710-KIRO

by Goldy — Sunday, 9/10/06, 5:26 pm

The Seahawks (and the Eagles) won, and I’m not preempted… so what better way to celebrate Sunday night than to pop open a cold beer and tune in to “The David Goldstein Show” on Newsradio 710-KIRO, tonight from 7PM to 10PM.

The lineup could change in response to breaking news, but here’s what I think I’ll be talking about tonight:

7PM: We’ve already got two Johnsons and a Dick on the state Supreme Court, two of which clearly dress right, but that’s not enough for the BIAW, who keeps slapping their members on the bench, this time pulling a Groen and whipping out yet another Johnson in their drive to take control of the court. Joining me to discuss the enormous sums of money the right wing is spending on our formerly low profile judicial races is Jenny Durkan, one of our state’s most prominent attorneys, and a co-chair of Citizens to Uphold the Constitution.

8PM: Curious about tonight’s broadcast of Path to 9/11, but can’t bear to bring yourself to watch ABC’s propagandistic, lying piece of crap? Well, turn off the TV and tune in 710-AM, because Bill Scher of Liberal Oasis is on East Coast time watching it for you. After he’s done, he’s gonna call in to critique the movie and discuss the controversy surrounding it.

9PM: Jim Hightower, one of the pioneers of progressive radio will not be on the show tonight. But he will be at Seattle’s Town Hall on Thursday, September 14, headlining a conference on energy, agriculture and sustainability. I’ll be talking with some of the conference organizers in the first couple segments, then a representative from the No on I-933 campaign will join me to talk about how that dangerous initiative could kill Washington’s efforts at sustainable growth.

Tune in tonight (or listen to the live stream) and give me a call: 1-877-710-KIRO (5476).

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Related

Comments

  1. 1

    ArtFart spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 5:42 pm

    My only regret about my intention not to watch “The Path to 9/11” is that I can’t recall Harvey Keitel being less than terrific in anything he’s done.

    What the hell, maybe I’ll just slap “Pulp Fiction” or “U-571” in the player instead.

  2. 2

    Doctor JCH Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 7:22 pm

    Seoul – North Korea is reportedly having a new medicine clinically tested on two subjects in Russia for leader Kim Jong-il, who is suffering from diabetes and heart disease. An unnamed MP from South Korea’s ruling party was quoted yesterday as telling the Yonhap news agency that he had been briefed on the drug tests by Kim Seung-kyu, the director of South Korea’s intelligence agency. [……..Carl Grossman, would you consider donating a kidney or part of your liver to the “progressive” Democrat cause??]

  3. 3

    The Socialist spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 7:44 pm

    Doctor JCH Kennedy gawd your such a pathetic asshole

  4. 4

    Mark The Redneck KENNEDY spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 7:50 pm

    …ABC’s propagandistic, lying piece of crap?”

    What’s not true? That Clinton ignored dozens of attacks? That he obstructed communication between CIA and FBI that could have connected the dots?

    Libruls can’t stand truth…

    And what about Michael Moore’s fucking lying movie? Or the hate piece on Ronald Reagan a few years ago that defamed him? Where were you guys then? Uh huh… you were cheering….

  5. 5

    The Socialist spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 8:02 pm

    Ronald fucking death squad Reagan defame him !!!!!

    that must be a neat trick

    Ronald Ragon is a fuck war crimanel Buttnutz

  6. 6

    The Socialist spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 8:05 pm

    Oh and being a maniger of the corner 7-11 dosn’t make you a corpert player Buttnutz

  7. 7

    Doctor JCH Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 8:43 pm

    One benefit of the controversy surrounding Path to 9/11 is that people are beginning to remember that there was once a Clinton hack National Security Adviser named Sandy “Socks” Berger who later stole Top Secret documents from the National Archives.

  8. 8

    treasonous pickle spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 8:51 pm

    MTR, what a buttmunch. Read the history. The “wall” was in place before Clinton and Bush just reinforced it.

  9. 9

    Facts Support My Positions spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 8:54 pm

    You know what is funny about the stuffing crap in his socks story. If a security guard saw him stuffing classified docs in his underwear, why did he not notify his superiors, until after much time has passed? Because even though Berger took some docs home in his briefcase it was just a political attack, like everything the GOP does.

    Remember Sandy Berger knew Al Queda was a threat, and was working on defending America from the, unlike the Bush Crime Family.

    I just can’t remember seeing any Republicans telling Clinton that the Republican controlled congress would be willing to do everything he asked to help him fight Al Queda. Oh that is right. They were doing everything they could to obstruct his attempts to go after said terrorists.

    If you don’t believe me, bring me some quotes of Republicans offering to help Clinton defend America…..

    I will be waiting.

    Yawn…..

    You won’t find any by the way. Republicans opposed every thing Clinton did, especially defending America from terrorists.

    Sorry righties.

    If you think this is not a fact, once again, point me to the link of Republicans offering to help Clinton fight terrorism, and offering him all the tools he would need.

    http://americablog.blogspot.co.....h-for.html

  10. 10

    John Barelli spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 8:58 pm

    “I don’t belong to an organized political party. I’m a Democrat.” – Will Rogers.

    Commentby MTR — 9/10/06@ 7:50 pm

    And what about Michael Moore’s (expletive deleted) lying movie? Or the hate piece on Ronald Reagan a few years ago that defamed him? Where were you guys then? Uh huh… you were cheering….

    Correct me if I’m wrong here, but didn’t the folks on the right make such a big stink about the Reagan movie that it was pulled from network television?

    And while I can’t comment about Mr. Moore’s film (because I never saw it) I have not seen it show up on network television claiming to be an unbiased account of actual events.

    Seems just a bit hypocritical for the right to be making a big deal about the ABC movie after the volume of protests they orchestrated against the earlier movie about the Reagans.

    Oh, wait. It’s ok for conservatives to protest a movie, it’s not ok for liberals to protest a movie.

    Personally, I think everyone is making way too much noise about this. Neocons are already convinced that President Bush is the second coming of Ronald Reagan, whom they consider to be one of the major saints. (Michael, Gabriel and Ronald.) They are also convinced that all Democrats and liberal Republicans are traitors. “Gee, if we could just get rid of that traitorous two-thirds of the country, this place would be great!”

    Some liberals are convinced that President Bush is actually the child of Satan and sibling to Ann Coulter, and that everything that happened even before he became President is his fault. Those same folks are against the death penalty for any crime except voting Republican. I’ve got e-mails from “People for the American Way” asking me to phone Disney in protest.

    The rest of us realize that it’s just a movie. Does anyone here remember the theme song from MST3K?

    “Just repeat to yourself, it’s just a show, I really should relax!”

  11. 11

    YO spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 9:08 pm

    JOHN DID I TELL YOU THAT YOUR AN IDIOT.GUESS I DID.ILL BET YOU WERE A SWEETHEART OF A CHIEF.PROBLEY SPENT ALL YOUR TIME IN THE CHIEFS MESS.

  12. 12

    Facts Support My Positions spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 9:09 pm

    Afghanistan Falling Apart. Another Mission Accomplished Right Bush?

    THE former aide-de-camp to the commander of the British taskforce in southern Afghanistan has described the campaign in Helmand province as “a textbook case of how to screw up a counter-insurgency”.
    “Having a big old fight is pointless and just making things worse,” said Captain Leo Docherty, of the Scots Guards, who became so disillusioned that he quit the army last month.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2350795,00.html

    Read this. The end of being Republican……

    To think Bush is making us safer would be cause for a trip to the funny farm, and your own rubber room.

    We could have turned Afghanistan into a paradise, and now it is just turning into another bunch of people that hate America….

    It didn’t have to be this way. Bush just can’t help but make people hate America and want to KILL ME!!!!!!

    If you are not actively opposing Bush, and everything he does you are a TRAITOR!!!!

  13. 13

    Facts Support My Positions spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 9:10 pm

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2350795,00.html

  14. 14

    Facts Support My Positions spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 9:24 pm

    Unity Iraq Government Now Falling Apart

    Another Mission Accomplished Eh Bush?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09.....ref=slogin

  15. 15

    RUFUS Fitzgerald Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 9:25 pm

    When the left calls a TV movie a “propagandistic, lying piece of crap?” and tries to censor it you know it is the truth.

  16. 16

    Tahoma Activist spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 9:40 pm

    Dude, Goldy, I don’t know how you stomach all these profane, right-wing loonies mucking up the works. Don’t you feel like it cheapens the discourse?

    I can’t figure out why any self-respecting moderate would take the time to learn a new point of view when these monkeys keep throwing their crap all over it.

    P.S. Watch “911: Press for Truth”! It’ll blow your freakin’ mind! (I’ve got it linked over at The Tahoma Activist

  17. 17

    Jimbo spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 10:02 pm

    I listened to the no on 933 here are all the lies
    1) farmland and forests cannot be turned to strip malls, that zoning has been in place since 1972 and 933 only goes back to 96
    2)933 has 1 out of state contributer, no on 933 has 3 and counting
    3)Its nice to see the no on 933 supporters admit they have stole billions from property owners
    4) you cannot buy a piece of property in a watershed and pave it over (refer to #1)
    5) 933 will not affect traffic the county only locked up 8000 lots across the county, condenced housing increases traffic

  18. 18

    ArtFart spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 10:10 pm

    The wife and I ended up watching CBS’s updated version of the French brothers’ film about the guys from Ladder One.

  19. 19

    John Barelli spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 10:16 pm

    Commentby YO— 9/10/06@ 9:08 pm

    At this point I think it has been conclusively shown that YO is the alter ego for Seaman Recruit JCH. In one personality, his voooooooowel keeeeeeeeys tend to stiiiiiiiick, and in the other he TYPES IN ALL CAPS AND MISSPELS LOTZ OF WURDS.

    If this is an example of the folks on the right, our country is in worse shape than I’d ever imagined.

    Fortunately, I have actually met intelligent, well-meaning Republicans that truly have our country’s best interest at heart. While we often disagree, there are many times when we have been able to understand and appreciate the other side’s point of view.

    Then there is the Recruit…

  20. 20

    RightEqualsStupid spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 10:16 pm

    One thing all this reminds us of is that 9.11 happened on Bush’s watch. No matter how many mock-u-mentaries the righties create, they won’t be able to change that little fact, nor the fact that the Bush family was hosting the bin Laden family in the US that day, nor the fact that Bush had a chance to kill Osama on September 10 and passed, nor the fact that while the rest of us were grounded, Bush let the bin Ladens and other Saudis fly out of the country, nor the fact that five years later, we haven’t found a 7′ tall Arab named Osama.

  21. 21

    John Slyfield spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 10:17 pm

    The Washington State Supreme Court…justices provided by the BIAW.

  22. 22

    RUFUS Fitzgerald Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 10:33 pm

    One thing all this reminds us of is that 9.11 happened on Bush’s watch.

    Commentby RightEqualsStupid— 9/10/06@ 10:16 pm

    I thank God Bush was president when 911 happened. If Gore was successful in stealing the Florida election this country would be a mess right now. A dozen 911’s would have taken place by now.

  23. 23

    Doctor JCH Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 10:34 pm

    “We must not listen in on the terrorist’s cell phone calls, or track their wire money transfers, because the Nuslims have rights”! [Carl Grossman]

  24. 24

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 11:49 pm

    23.

    Thank you, Kreskin.

  25. 25

    Doctor JCH Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 9/10/06 at 11:58 pm

    “The Path to 9/11″………..Democrats: traitors and cowards!!!!

  26. 26

    GS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 1:22 am

    10.

    And Pelosi and her gang are your answer to a strong terrorist fighting congress…..

    Make me laugh some more…

    You’ve kicked out the only democrats that had it right on terrorism.

  27. 27

    The Real Mark spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 2:49 am

    Hey, Roger Rabbit, I think Post #26 is directed to you!

  28. 28

    See BS - I Love that Station spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 3:01 am

    Wow ABC actually did better than we thought at See BS. The special line was “Are there no men in Washington”.

  29. 29

    See BS - I Love that Station spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 3:02 am

    We also liked “They think this is a police action.” when John O’Neill was talking to Richard Clarke onver how Clinton operated.

  30. 30

    Mike Webb SUCKS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 4:48 am

    Correct me if I’m wrong here, but didn’t the folks on the right make such a big stink about the Reagan movie that it was pulled from network television? “Just repeat to yourself, it’s just a show, I really should relax!” Commentby John Barelli— 9/10/06@ 8:58 pm

    Yes John, you should relax. To answer your baseless charge above, no one from Congress threatened a TV station.

    I asked these questions yesterday John Barelli. I suppose you lacked the intestinal fortitude to answer them today like you missed them yesterday:

    Moonbats why when you are cornered like the democRATS you are want to shut down Disney/ABC?

    “We write with serious concerns about the planned upcoming broadcast of The Path to 9/11 mini-series on September 10 and 11. Countless reports from experts on 9/11 who have viewed the program indicate numerous and serious inaccuracies that will undoubtedly serve to misinform the American people about the tragic events surrounding the terrible attacks of that day. Furthermore, the manner in which this program has been developed, funded, and advertised suggests a partisan bent unbecoming of a major company like Disney and a major and well respected news organization like ABC. We therefore urge you to cancel this broadcast to cease Disney’s plans to use it as a teaching tool in schools across America through Scholastic. Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.

    The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events. …

    Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.”

    Why did your congressional donko friends plan on using the power of the federal government to demand political changes to a program before it airs, which in itself is a dangerous precedent?

    When the Reagan “documentary” was being bantied about did congressinal Republicans call for the removal. No!

    Did congressional Republicans threaten CBS’ broadcast license? No!

    Did congressional Republicans threaten government censorship if they don’t get their own way? No!

    Did congressional Republicans whip out lawyers like Clinton has done? No!

    Did congressional Republicans Threaten CBS with legislative and regulatory reprisals over content of Reagan Film? No!

    Did congressional Republicans threaten the CBS with free speeach writs? No!

    So how can Goldie and the Furballettes support this attack on ABC? Only from the mind of a moonbat!

    Just asking moonbats: What did Kos or Michael Moore have say this morning? Did you get the latest ingredients for your September 10, 2006 kool-aid?

    Commentby Mike Webb SUCKS— 9/10/06@ 11:55 am

    So how do you support this attack on artistic freedom.

    I THOUGHT THE MOONBATS WERE THE ONES SCREAMING ARTISTIC FREEDOM WHEN A CRUCIFIX WAS PUT IN A JAR OF PISS OR DUNG WAS PLACED ON A JESUS STATUE? NOW MOONBATS WANTED TO STOP THIS ARTISTIC FILM??

    The duplicitiousness of Moonbats

  31. 31

    Mike Webb SUCKS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 4:59 am

    One thing all this reminds us of is that 9.11 happened on Bush’s watch. No matter how many mock-u-mentaries the righties create, they won’t be able to change that little fact, nor the fact that the Bush family was hosting the bin Laden family in the US that day, nor the fact that Bush had a chance to kill Osama on September 10 and passed, nor the fact that while the rest of us were grounded, Bush let the bin Ladens and other Saudis fly out of the country, nor the fact that five years later, we haven’t found a 7′ tall Arab named Osama. Commentby RightEqualsStupid— 9/10/06@ 10:16 pm

    Yes, it takes men with real stones to dig us out of the mess placed there by femi-men (thanks HowCan).

    Lefties close their eyes to books written about the Clinton years. They denounce them as right-wing hack jobs. If they are how can history show the events really happened? The movie last night openly displayed the contempt the Moonbat Administration had for these terrorists, where the FBI workers said that written above by SEE BS! Police action my ass.

    Clinton even let Bin Laden get away by having Medeline Dulllight tell Musharrif so early when the cruise missiles were launched, Bin Laden got away. I bet Geroge Tenet was not a happy camper! Now this will hang over Hillary. Good!

  32. 32

    Mike Webb SUCKS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 5:00 am

    The Washington State Supreme Court…justices provided by the BIAW. Commentby John Slyfield— 9/10/06@ 10:17 pm

    Gerry “Let Pedophile Killers Go Early” Alexander is a real winner of a judge. Probably a good friend of Roger Furball.

  33. 33

    MtRainier spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 5:16 am

    Rufus Busch @23, “if Gore was president on 911 the country would be a mess right now”. Prescious Adolf, (Katrina, Abramoff, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Coulter, Limbaugh, Sen Allen, Delay and Cunningham agree with you – over 60% of the population does not drink your ‘Jonestown’ koolaid!)

  34. 34

    Mike Webb SUCKS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 5:18 am

    Looks like the AP had a mole in Saddam’s camp.

    http://70.168.46.200/Released/.....026108.pdf

    Republic of Iraq
    The Presidency of the Republic

    The Intelligence Service

    Date: 25/7/2000

    Number: 6146

    Secret

    To: 5th / 4th / 13th Directorates

    We were informed from one of our sources (the degree of trust in him is good) who works in the American Associated Press Agency [emphasis added] that the agency broadcasted to through computer to its branches worldwide the following

    Proves the MSM are anti-neocon assisters of terrorism. Didn’t history prove they vote 85% OR GREATER MOONBAT?

    To steal the Puddy line – Nuff Said or was it NUFF Said or was it Nuff SAID! Well they all work!

  35. 35

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 6:11 am

    Just about any utterance from the wingnut aisle is TOO MUCH SAID WITH TOO LITTLE THOUGHT. Your latest missive is no different. Who was the AP source? What was their job at AP? Was he/she and American? What was the substance of the information? Was it part of a counterintelligence operation (you know, Valerie Plame?)

  36. 36

    Another TJ spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 6:20 am

    Commentby Mike Webb SUCKS— 9/11/06@ 4:48 am

    I’m glad you brought it up because congressional Republicans did indeed threaten CBS over the movie about the Reagans.

    “Nuff said,” indeed.

  37. 37

    Daddy Love spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 7:04 am

    JCH @ 24

    “We must not listen in on the terrorist’s cell phone calls, or track their wire money transfers, because the Nuslims have rights!”

    Well, American citizens have constitutional protections against warrantless earch, and all people in teh US are guaranteed equal protection under tha law. Neither have naything to do with being Muslim, but Muslims are certainly protected.

  38. 38

    For the Clueless spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 7:06 am

    WOS – Insane as usual. The propaganda (this stupid movie) contains lies. Lies you believe in. You can cheerlead all you want for those lies because you’re insane.

    The reality-based folks refuse to let lies be broadcast over the public airwaves without a fight. Edit out the lies and you’re left with a normal bad TV movie. That’s all we’re asking for.

    Already the freepers are complaining there’s not wingnut fantasies in this movie.

  39. 39

    For the Clueless spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 7:09 am

    WOS – you’re a freeper aren’t you?

  40. 40

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 7:41 am

    From the “McGavick’s Fables” thread:

    King 5 Robert Mak had mcgavick on this morning.
    You may want to ask Mak for the copy of the Article detailing the Track Star that they say they have.
    You may want to watch it, it discredits all your claims of Black out Drunk, Horrible Parenting, Credit Profiling, and Track Star Status.
    You are now considered the MEDIA, for your efforts.
    Commentby darcys my gal— 9/10/06@ 11:38 am
    >/i>

    Just when did Robert Mak speak about that video? I just watched the “Up Front” show, and no mention of a video about the track meet.

    When Mak asked about the track meet, McGavick’s “answer” was that he “spent the weekend looking for the clipping.” He didn’t say he found it.

    Someone who was present would do. How about a date and the name of the competition?

  41. 41

    klake spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 8:21 am

    We could have turned Afghanistan into a paradise, and now it is just turning into another bunch of people that hate America….

    If you are not actively opposing Bush, and everything he does you are a TRAITOR!!!!

    Commentby Facts Support My Positions— 9/10/06@ 9:09 pm

    You better get you shit strait Afghanistan is being run by NATO now, so take your complaints to your French lovers. When we the troops look for support for our missions, amazing chaps like you jump out as TRAITORS. How short a Liberals memory is, maybe five seconds, you all don’t remember 11 September 2001. Naw; you think Bush flew those planes into the WTC, right.

  42. 42

    For the Clueless spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 8:39 am

    On the 5th anniversary of 9/11 here’s our fearful misleader with Laura at his side laying a wreath, all but alone with his bankrupt policies:

    Here, here and here.

  43. 43

    Facts Support My Positions spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 8:59 am

    #68 So you think leaving Karzi out to dry, and not giving him the money we promised him to help rebuild his country was ok?

    As far as equipping the troops, givin billionares huge tax breaks meant more to the Republicans in control of procurement than body armor, and up armored humvees.

    I think the best way to support our troops is to prosecute our lying leaders that lied us into the quagmire in Iraq (proven), and thought a little rhetoric was all it was going to take to get rid of the Taliban for good.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2350795,00.html

    You have to paste the link. Two commas don’t work in this text box.

    Once again we could have spent our resources bring Afghanistan out of the stone age. We didn’t even try.

    Killing innocent people. The only thing the Republican Traitors in charge of our military understand. Nation building costs money, and all the money went to the top 1% in the form of taxbreak. By the way, if you need a fix these days, dope is practically free. Our “friends” have upped their heroin output 60% in the last year.

    And for supporting troops. We have a deserter, and a draft dodger in charge. You already know how they feel about the military…..

    http://archives.seattletimes.n.....raq+report

    Lied into war against people that were known to be no threat. This is how Bush supports the troops. You support him, you are a TRAITOR.

  44. 44

    Doctor JCH Kennedy spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 10:55 am

    Sandy “Socks” Berger: Carl Grossman?

  45. 45

    John Barelli spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 2:17 pm

    “I don’t belong to an organized political party. I’m a Democrat.” – Will Rogers.

    Commentby Mike Webb SUCKS— 9/10/06@ 11:55 am

    Wow, MWS. At least half of my “Relax” comment was aimed at my own side. Maybe you missed the comment “Personally, I think everyone is making way too much noise about this.”

    It’s a MOVIE. The far right will believe it to be gospel. The far left will consider it a pack of lies. Everyone else will go watch a rerun of CSI Miami. Next week nobody will care.

    As to the “baseless” comment about the right getting its knickers in a wad about the Reagan documentary, the facts are that there was an organized protest of CBS that ended with the network choosing not to air the movie on network television. Nothing was said about the exact methods used, but I could do the research if it’s that important to you.

    Perhaps I could suggest a very good shade-grown, songbird-safe, fair-trade decaf. It really is quite tasty.

    http://www.equalexchange.com/decaffeinated-coffee

    As to my lack of intestinal fortitude, that seems pretty funny coming from someone that doesn’t post under his/her own name. Of course, I could be wrong about that, but if I am, you might want to consider getting a name change, Mr. Sucks.

  46. 46

    Mike Webb SUCKS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 2:34 pm

    I’m glad you brought it up because congressional Republicans did indeed threaten CBS over the movie about the Reagans. “Nuff said,” indeed. Commentby Another TJ— 9/11/06@ 6:20 am

    Admittly I didn’t know that since I have never visited this moonbat before. Now you have the head of the RNC and a Congressperson writing about the Reagan miniseries. Interesting Development.

    Compare/contrast this with Howard Screech Dean, Nancy Face Pelosi, Harry Pay My Son Please Reid, Bill I like Juicy Cigars Clinton, Hillary UN Villager Clinton, and many other congressional moonbats threatening ABC.

    BIG DIFFERENCE bubba!

  47. 47

    Mike Webb SUCKS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 2:40 pm

    As to the “baseless” comment about the right getting its knickers in a wad about the Reagan documentary, the facts are that there was an organized protest of CBS that ended with the network choosing not to air the movie on network television. Nothing was said about the exact methods used, but I could do the research if it’s that important to you. Commentby John Barelli— 9/11/06@ 2:17 pm

    I now know one Congressman and the head of the RNC. Look at the munber of moonbats all in a tizzy PLUS Clinton’s lawyers. What a nutcase! Do I need to provide commentary for all of the above plus others? There is no comparison, whatsoever.

    Regarding my name, that’s a secret. Why? Too many nut-case whack jobs here.

  48. 48

    Mike Webb SUCKS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 2:41 pm

    munber should be number

  49. 49

    Another TJ spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 2:47 pm

    Please cite the “threat” found in the letter sent to ABC by the Democratic leadership.

  50. 50

    Mike Webb SUCKS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 3:41 pm

    I already did. If you can’t read too bad.

  51. 51

    Another TJ spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 3:50 pm

    That letter doesn’t threaten anyone. Try again.

  52. 52

    Mike Webb SUCKS spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 4:24 pm

    The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events. …

    Should Disney allow this programming to proceed as planned, the factual record, millions of viewers, countless schoolchildren, and the reputation of Disney as a corporation worthy of the trust of the American people and the United States Congress will be deeply damaged. We urge you, after full consideration of the facts, to uphold your responsibilities as a respected member of American society and as a beneficiary of the free use of the public airwaves to cancel this factually inaccurate and deeply misguided program. We look forward to hearing back from you soon.”

    If that isn’t a veiled threat I don’t know what is. The Republicans NEVER pulled those shenanigans over the Reagans. NEVER! NEVER!

    You are summarily dismissed through your own stupidity.

    PS Look at Chucky Schumer and Harry Reid publically said!

  53. 53

    Another TJ spews:

    Monday, 9/11/06 at 4:37 pm

    If that isn’t a veiled threat I don’t know what is. The Republicans NEVER pulled those shenanigans over the Reagans. NEVER! NEVER!

    Pointing out someone’s obligations and asking that they live up to those obligations is not a threat, veiled or otherwise. And, given your own track record on what the GOP did and did not pull over “The Reagans,” it might be best if you quit while you’re behind (of course, you just keep coming back for more – trust me, just stay down).

“The David Goldstein Show”, tonight on 710-KIRO

by Goldy — Sunday, 7/2/06, 5:54 pm

I’m gonna wing it a bit tonight on the “The David Goldstein Show”– Newsradio 710-KIRO, from 7PM to 10PM — fewer guests, more time for callers. So, um… please call in.

7PM: Civility in politics? Is that a good thing? Is it even possible? We’re going to talk about Councilman Reagan Dunn’s latest partisan attacks on King County Records and Elections, and GOP Senate hopeful Mike McGavick’s call for a new civility in the other Washington. I’ll try to be civil about it… but I doubt I’ll succeed.

8PM: Is the New York Times guilty of treason, or is the Bush administration just looking for an excuse to crack down on the press?

9PM: Seattle Developer Martin Selig just spent $630,000 to lie an estate tax repeal initiative onto the ballot. But believe it or not, when it comes to misleading, destructive, special-interest-funded initiatives, things may actually be worse in Oregon. Carla and Torrid from Loaded Orygun join me on The Blogger Hour to discuss what’s gone wrong with the initiative process south of our border, and what that portends for Washington state.

Tune in tonight and give me a call: 1-877-710-KIRO (5476).

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Related

Comments

  1. 54

    Mount Olympus Hiker spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 6:31 pm

    have fun

  2. 55

    Daniel K spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 6:34 pm

    For a good commentary on the NY Times issue, check out this Crooks and Liar MBNBC Countdown video.

    Howard Kurtz also weighs in about the matter and the fact the Wall Street Journal also wrote about this supposedly secret spy program.

  3. 56

    headless lucy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 6:37 pm

    I’ll be listening from about 7:30 to 8:00. I’ve never heard Goldy on the radio. Mark the Retard said he has a squeeky voice, but then again, so does Neil Young.

    Remember: Kill the head and headless lucy will not die!

  4. 57

    Proud To Be An Ass spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 6:48 pm

    Goldy,

    Please read “Why Conseravtives Can’t Govern”, by Alan Wolfe in the current Washington Monthly. Highly recommended, and it fits nicely with your 7:00 meme.

  5. 58

    Neil The Redneck Young spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 7:09 pm

    We got a thousand points of light
    For the homeless man
    We got a kinder, gentler,
    Machine gun hand
    We got department stores
    and toilet paper
    Got styrofoam boxes
    for the ozone layer
    Got a man of the people,
    says keep hope alive
    Got fuel to burn,
    got roads to drive.

    Keep on rockin’ in the free world,

  6. 59

    headless lucy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 7:17 pm

    “Let’s impeach the president for lyin’.”

    Neil Young

  7. 60

    Neil The Redneck Young spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 7:35 pm

    Moonbat poll:

    If you could wave a magic wand, and make Murka like any other country in the world, which one would it be?

    1) France
    2) Canada
    3) Cuba
    4) Sweden
    5) North Korea
    6) Columbia
    7) Souf Africa
    8) Russia
    9) Other (specify)

  8. 61

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 7:37 pm

    Speaking of ozone layer… a few years ago, that was the darling of the gullible environmentalists. What happened to that? When did solar warming take its place? Why?

    How you moonbats doing with that chi squared analysis of current temps? Any luck yet?

  9. 62

    ManofTruth spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 7:47 pm

    #7 I`ll take answer (9) other

    Paradise (by the Dashboard Light or any other)

    #8 You graduated from 6th grade yet ?

    Looks like maybe you`ll be repeating it next year I guess

    Soooo when do the real difficult questions get asked around here ? Any adults in residence ?

    *sound of crickets*

    OK, guess not

  10. 63

    Tree Frog Farmer spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 7:52 pm

    The Montreal Protocol was signed in 1985, leading to the banning by the major industrial powers of chloroflourocarbons, and they were by and large no longer in use by 1996. In 2003 it was reported that the ozone layer is no longer being depleted, quite possibly because of the banning of the CFC. Unfortunately CFC’s have an atmospheric life of about 150 to 200 years. The best guesstimate is that the ozone layer will not significantly improve for a lifetime.
    This underscores the thought that Mankind’s action can damage the world environment, and a change in human behaviors can help and improve it.

  11. 64

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 7:54 pm

    Ummm… have any of you moonbats noticed… that the hurricane coming out of Algore’s smokestack on his movie is spinning in the WRONG FUCKING DIRECTION ???????

    Yeah, but the “science” is sound. Right?

    LMAO…

  12. 65

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 7:59 pm

    TFF – You’ll be needing some treatment for rake handle injuries…

    1) Explain how CFCs break down.
    2) Explain how they get to the ozone layer
    3) Explain how chlorine interacts with ozone in the atmosphere when they can’t even get it to react in the fucking lab.
    4) Tell us how much chlorine is man made versus big stuff like volcanos.
    5) Explain why it happens some years and some years it doesn’t.
    6) Show some data for UV radiation increase
    7) Show where skin cancer rates are way up under the hole, or show data where plants have been affected.
    8) Explain why natural sinks like THE FUCKING OCEANS aren’t effective.

    WHACK ! ! ! !

    I’ll give the correct answers later.

    Gullible fucking idiots…

  13. 66

    Tree Frog Farmer spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 8:08 pm

    Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Gold Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay GoldyPay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Gold Pay GoldyPay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy Pay Goldy

  14. 67

    Tree Frog Farmer spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 8:12 pm

    As long as Mark the Retarded Redneck is a deadbeat he has no standing on HA. As long as Mark the Retarded Redneck is a deadbeat he has no standing on HA. As long as Mark the Retarded Redneck is a deadbeat he has no standing on HA. As long as Mark the Retarded Redneck is a deadbeat he has no standing on HA. As long as Mark the Retarded Redneck is a deadbeat he has no standing on HA. As long as Mark the Retarded Redneck is a deadbeat he has no standing on HA. As long as Mark the Retarded Redneck is a deadbeat he has no standing on HA.

  15. 68

    BushWentAwol spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 8:42 pm

    Civility in politics?? The right wing traitors decided that was dead when they let the Newt The Hoot loooooose on Congress. From that day on it was war and I predict civil war isn’t far behind. That’s why I say liberals should arm themselves like RR and I have done. Any rightie comes to my door trying that Nazi bullshit and they’ll wish they hadn’t!

  16. 69

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 8:51 pm

    TFF – Didn’t think so.

    LMAO…

  17. 70

    me spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 9:12 pm

    The Bush Admin smokes crack

  18. 71

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 9:25 pm

    Mark the Idiot will give the “correct” answers.

    These are the ones he gets from the circle-jerk blogs created by college dropouts working long hours at Wendy’s now that theire parents are dead, disgusted, demented, whatever.

    HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR

    Have you paid your debt to Goldy yet, Marky? I’m really looking forward to your debate with dj.

    Put in some overtime down a Blockbuster, won’t you? $100 isn’t that much.

  19. 72

    K spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 9:31 pm

    MTR-

    Why don’t you start here for a few answers. Why should we waste our time on one so uninterested in actual fact and debate.

    http://www.epa.gov/Ozone/science/index.html

    The EPA, pretty tightly controlled by the Bush Administration, does not dispute the issue.

    Chi square that.

  20. 73

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 9:43 pm

    19.

    I wonder when Dr. Redneck is going to publish his findings so that the EPA can be set straight. I’m sure that Dr. Redneck’s detailed analysis of the fallacy of CFC affecting the ozone layer would be of great interest to chemical companies and other manufacturers, in fact, one wonders why they aren’t funding him.

  21. 74

    K spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 9:44 pm

    MTR- questions for you:

    Where was the Ozone Hole?

    Answer- Over Antartica

    How much exposed skin (suseptible to cancer) is there in Antarctica?

    Answer- Figure it out yourself

    dumbshit

  22. 75

    Proud To Be An Ass spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 9:48 pm

    Vagina Lips asks many questions, provides no answers, cites no sources–one can only conclude he is a dimwitted jacknape.

    Here’s some for you, fuckwad:

    1) Explain how the earth is flat.
    2) Explain how it looks like a flat disc, even from space!!!!!
    3) Explain how you can walk a long way and never fucking fall off the edge.
    4) Tell us how it never manages to “flip” over.
    5) Explain why some people believe it so, and others don’t!
    6) Show some data on how flatness is a universal characteristic.
    7) Show statistically that flatness is associated with disturbing psychological behavior.
    8) Explain why you can sail continually in one direction and get back to where you started. Fucking clue: Strong headwinds don’t count.

    Enjoy, dimwit.

  23. 76

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 9:49 pm

    Did some right-wing half-wit who can’t honor the bets he loses just say something?

    If this twit would only honor the bet to which he challenged Goldy and then LOST – he could have his sorry ass handed to him by dj.

  24. 77

    REP Pat Kennedy [D-Bitchslap the Black Security Guard At LAX] spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 9:53 pm

    Rush is on Monday morning. I’ll listen to him, along with 20 million others. [How many listen to Goldystein?]

  25. 78

    RUFUS Fitzgerald Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:00 pm

    Very interesting show Goldy. There was ..yawn..zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. And of course that bit you did was …yawn…zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. All and all very yawn….zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

  26. 79

    howcanyoubePROUDtobeanASS spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:01 pm

    ok let it be kn ow that I tuned it @ 9:53….

    I gotta tell ya goldstein that running up and down the musical scale trilling and intonation you do with your voice HAS GOT TO GO.

    OH MY GOD the musical scale talking has got to go.

    You are not, I REPEAT you, are NOY hosting story time for pre-schoolers at the childrens library…. although most of what you blab about here and there could be considered fairy tales…

    Treat those 12 listeners as adults goldstein… and for God sake, GO LISTEN TO A TAPE OF YOUR SELF!… If not, KIRO can consider renaming your show “Sing Along with goldy The H’ASS”!

  27. 80

    howcanyou be PROUDtobeaKennedyandanASS spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:03 pm

    oops forgot to change my name….

  28. 81

    Puddybud Michael Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:11 pm

    Hey moonbats:

    Looks like your good friends are acting like Kennedys.

    http://www.chron.com/disp/stor.....14662.html

  29. 82

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:16 pm

    You’d think these Unhinged Politics plants would have heard Goldy, by now. Starting in 2003 he has been a repeated guest on the John Carlson show on KVI, in 2005 Snarky observed

    “I’ll be on the John Carlson Show again this afternoon at 3:15pm, KVI 570. David Goldstein will apparently be on the show again too. I worry for Goldstein that he seems to believe that being invited on KVI is a sign that he’s being taken seriously. I’m only speculating, but my hunch is that he’s there mainly so the listeners can enjoy making fun of him.”

    Snarky’s BVD must really be in a twist, now that Goldy has a regular show and he doesn’t.

    Goldy’s been on KIRO several times in the past few months, before the got his show. That must really crimp Snarky’s nuts, don’t you think?

    Then there’s the 10 Podcasting Liberally shows that have had threads devoted to them here.

    All the sniping at Goldy sounds a lot like green envy.

  30. 83

    howcanyou be PROUDtobeaKennedyandanASS spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:27 pm

    Next thing you know, he’ll be demanding a bubble machine… “a one and and two” … ‘wunnerful, wunnerful’

    Do re mi fa so la ti do, so do ti la so fa mi re do
    Do re mi fa so la ti do, so do ti la so fa mi re do
    Do re mi fa so la ti do, so do ti la so fa mi re do

  31. 84

    howcanyou be PROUDtobeaKennedyandanASS spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:39 pm

    oh boohoo turtle…. do you know the difference between “sniping” and constructive criticism?

    That up/down, up/dowm, down/up thing he does is annoying as heel and sounds ridiculous.

    My suggestion would be a good voice coach to learn a bit of modulation….

    but, if that’s not his cup of tea,,, quite frankly, I DON’T GIVE A HORSES ASS!

  32. 85

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:44 pm

    15

    “Any rightie comes to my door trying that Nazi bullshit and they’ll wish they hadn’t!” Commentby BushWentAwol— 7/2/06@ 8:42 pm

    Any rightie comes to my burrow trying that Nazi bullshit, he wouldn’t be around long enough to wish anything.

  33. 86

    Puddybud Michael Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:45 pm

    howcanyou be PROUDtobeaKennedyandanASS: You listened to his tripe tonight? I wastch the NY Mets/NY Yankees game. Interesting. More fun than listening to someone scratch a chalkboard with their voice!!!!

  34. 87

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:47 pm

    I’m all in favor of civility. I think Republicans should go first, since they started the incivility.

  35. 88

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 10:50 pm

    I also think Republicans should SUPPORT THE TROOPS instead of just blowing smoke out of their asses about supporting the troops. I’m not asking them to enlist (God forbid I should have to share a foxhole with one of them). All I’m saying is that if you really want to SUPPORT THE TROOPS then PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS by sending $99 to http://www.operation-helmet.org/. Otherwise, you’re just blowing smoke out of your ass.

  36. 89

    RUFUS Fitzgerald Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:06 pm

    34

    Shit we are just getting started. We are not going to compromise anymore. If the left wants to talk on our terms then so be it. Until then get to it.

  37. 90

    RUFUS Fitzgerald Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:09 pm

    Any rightie comes to my burrow trying that Nazi bullshit, he wouldn’t be around long enough to wish anything.

    Commentby Roger Rabbit— 7/2/06@ 10:44 pm

    I like it. The left is finally starting to come around with the second amendment. I am glad. I would hate to see what would happend if the left ever tried to grab all the guns. Actually no I wouldn’t, there would be a lot of dead lefties. heehe

  38. 91

    Harry Tuttle aka voter advocate spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:27 pm

    31.

    Yes, I do know the differenced between sniping and constructive criticism. The prospect of receiving constructive criticism from you is laughable.

    mod·u·la·tion Audio pronunciation of “modulation” ( P ) Pronunciation Key (mj-lshn)
    n.

    1. The act or process of modulating.
    2. The state of being modulated.
    3. Music.
    1. A passing or transition from one key or tonality to another.
    2. The result of such a transition.
    4.
    1. A change in stress, pitch, loudness, or tone of the voice; an inflection of the voice.
    2. An instance of such a change or an inflection.

    5. The harmonious use of language, as in poetry or prose.
    6. Electronics. The variation of a property of an electromagnetic wave or signal, such as its amplitude, frequency, or phase.

    It’s too bad that Snarky couldn’t get on the radio. You guys are just like day old fish.

  39. 92

    howcanyoubePROUDtobeaKennedyandanASS spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:31 pm

    howcanyou be PROUDtobeaKennedyandanASS: You listened to his tripe tonight? I wastch the NY Mets/NY Yankees game. Interesting. More fun than listening to someone scratch a chalkboard with their voice!!!! -Commentby Puddybud Michael Kennedy— 7/2/06@ 10:45 pm

    7 minutes …

    It wasn’t a ‘really big really big sheww’ but I’m pretty sure the loonies were
    “All Smiles.”

    wunnerful, wunnerful!

  40. 93

    howcanyoubePROUDtobeaKennedyandanASS spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:33 pm

    and goldstein goes UP, down, UP, down, UP, down, down, UP, UP, down, UP, down…. sing along loonies and leftys….

    UP, down, UP, down, UP, down, down, UP, UP, down, UP, down

  41. 94

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:34 pm

    36

    “If the left wants to talk on our terms”

    You gotta quit smoking whatever you’re smoking.

  42. 95

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:36 pm

    38

    Harry, you’re wasting your time trying to teach literacy to these nazi fucks! Just lock and load. They understand the sound of brass sliding on steel — it’s one of the few things they do understand.

  43. 96

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:36 pm

    Liberals must arm!

  44. 97

    howcanyoubePROUDtobeaKennedyandanASS spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:36 pm

    1. A change in stress, pitch, loudness, or tone of the voice; an inflection of the voice.
    2. An instance of such a change or an inflection.

    Oh yeah, he’s go that nailed… and overworked…

    Do re mi fa so la ti do, so do ti la so fa mi re do
    UP, down, UP, down, UP, down, down, UP, UP, down, UP, down
    Do re mi fa so la ti do, so do ti la so fa mi re do
    UP, down, UP, down, UP, down, down, UP, UP, down, UP, down
    Do re mi fa so la ti do, so do ti la so fa mi re do
    UP, down, UP, down, UP, down, down, UP, UP, down, UP, down

  45. 98

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:39 pm

    37

    Hey shitface — any time you want to play “civil war,” pay a visit to my burrow! Make sure you bring a gun, so I can claim self-defense. I’m not holding my breath, though. Like all wingnuts, you’re just blowing smoke out of your ass. When there’s a real fight, wingnuts are nowhere to be seen.

  46. 99

    howcanyoubePROUDtobeaKennedyandanASS spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 11:54 pm

    BRING IT ON, LITTLE BUNNY

  47. 100

    skagit spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 12:17 am

    Goldy, you shoulda turned the whole NY Times thing on its head by making the topic “do you think the wall street journal is treasonous ” and every time someone would try to turn it back to the NYT you’d stop them . . . both papers did it and yet only the NYT is getting the Rove treatment.

  48. 101

    ManofTruth spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 2:26 am

    #46 Nice Photoshop work there, that your new ID ?

    How are the hormone treatments going ?

  49. 102

    Harry Tuttle aka voter advocate spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 5:37 am

    42.

    Oh, I know they can’t be taught, but at least ProudAss finally got to what he really means, Goldy has a high voice. Not a big, manly voice like Chris Sanders, say.

    Bernie Ward slaps down Chris Sanders

  50. 103

    Harry Tuttle aka voter advocate spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 5:40 am

    48.

    Talk about ahigh voice, ProudAss, you’ve got virtual contralto.

  51. 104

    madison spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 5:46 am

    the only problem with a mcgavick’s current tv ad saying he wants to heal the gap is if you don’t agree with the gop proposuals you will be labeled as non american. remember bushs’ ‘you’re either with us or against us.’ has it become impossible for people to think and reason out what our politicans are saying? i may be jumping the gun with mcgavick but he is party line and the current political game plan has been to divide and conquer. and it has worked, the country is divided 50-50.
    so the ny times informs the public about secret survailance and bush is like ‘that’s treason’. 2 other other papers ran the story and they’re not mentioned. but MOST IMPORTANTLY who in bush’s admin LEAKED the story? i feel the public needs to know what our government is up to. this secret stuff for our ‘own good’ is bullshit. the american people need to start using their ability to think and reason and stop the knee jerk reactions.

  52. 105

    Karl Marx spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 8:30 am

    We should seize all wealth, particularly inherited wealth, and re-distribute it to all.

  53. 106

    ArtFart spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 9:44 am

    Mark the Brainless Troll…if you’re listening to Rush this morning, could you let us all know if he has anything to say about what a wonderful time he and his penis had in the Dominican Republic?

  54. 107

    headless lucy spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 10:09 am

    re 7: I’d like the internal freedoms the Swedes enjoy and the reality based militaristic doggedness of North Korea.

    Basically, my answer to you is : KMA, buttmunch. We’ll find a use for those Halliburton concentration camps before this whole sad story is over. There just about big enough to hold every chickenhawk in the U.S.

  55. 108

    REP Pat Kennedy [D-Bitchslap the Black Security Guard At LAX] spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 10:31 am

    I’d like the internal freedoms the Swedes enjoy and the reality based militaristic doggedness of North Korea.

    Commentby headless lucy— 7/3/06@ 10:09 am […………………………70% tax rates in Sweden, and North Korea is the Perfect Hillary Village. HL, are you a NEA “teacher” in the public sector?]

  56. 109

    REP Pat Kennedy [D-Bitchslap the Black Security Guard At LAX] spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 10:33 am

    We should seize all wealth, particularly inherited wealth, and re-distribute it to all.

    Commentby Karl Marx [……………………………………………………Karl, You copied this from Roger Rabbit! hehe, JCH Kennedy]

  57. 110

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 10:45 am

    Fart 54 – I’m sure it’s better quality at lower price. He doesn’t hafta fuck Murkan women anymore. He can afford the best.

  58. 111

    jsa on commercial drive spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 11:14 am

    Rush is a big star with millions of fans. Why is he going to the Dominican Republic anyhow? Why can’t he get his freak on with his fans?

    Oh, right. His fans are all castrated white men like MTR.

    Sorry. My bad.

  59. 112

    Proud To Be An Ass spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 12:25 pm

    @59: It may not be possible to make a silk purse from a sow’s ear, but you can always put lipstick on a pig. In his whacked out drug haze, why should Rush care who or what he’s gettin’ it on with? From what I can see from MTR’s comments, he is predisposed to “getting stuck”, so getting fucked by Rush shouldn’t bother him in the slightest. He’d probably enjoy the notoriety.

  60. 113

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 12:30 pm

    58

    “He doesn’t hafta fuck Murkan women anymore.”

    You oughta know, Retardo! Can you tell us again how much your last fuck cost you?

    F I V E H U N D R E D T H O U S A N D D O L L A R S

    har har har har har har har

    (raucous rabbit laughter in background)

  61. 114

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 12:33 pm

    Josef — have you asked Zits for a date yet? The longer you wait, the more time she has to pick up STDs.

  62. 115

    Puddybud Michael Kennedy spews:

    Monday, 7/3/06 at 6:52 pm

    Dingleberries: Your good friends the islamofascists are showing their true colors in Israel. They are setting deadlines over the Israeli soldier and possibly killing him like they did to that 18 year old settler and then they burned his body. Yeah your good friends. So the next time they take a moonbat hostage like Nick Berg, by your reckoning we should leave them be right?

    If moonbats had a stance on the war on terror you guys would win congress hands down. But you don’t and you won’t.

  63. 116

    Puddybud Michael Kennedy spews:

    Tuesday, 7/4/06 at 7:30 am

    No matter what, Happy 4th of July Moonbats!

  64. 117

    s7POzyFZs7 spews:

    Saturday, 7/8/06 at 6:31 pm

    F9gjDK24sPO SJf19wP6653np lGrs4LzU25a

  65. 118

    w3dOnOz8MJ spews:

    Sunday, 7/9/06 at 7:36 pm

    xFnf5FKIUMhK KTexc4Tm6C vPbgUMqcGlC9Cb

“The David Goldstein Show”, tonight on 710-KIRO

by Goldy — Sunday, 6/25/06, 4:50 pm

It’s 90 degrees in Seattle today, but it’ll be even hotter tonight on “The David Goldstein Show”, Newsradio 710-KIRO, from 7PM to 10PM. (Actually, it’s pretty chilly in the studio… that “hot” thing was just a stupid figure of speech.)

7PM: Can senate challenger Mike McGavick really run as a “moderate” and “independent” when he’s filling his campaign coffers from mining, oil, insurance and the rest of the GOP’s usual suspects? We get a totally unbiased, objective, nonpartisan answer from WA State Democratic Party chair Dwight Pelz.

8PM: What will it take for Democrats to win in Eastern Washington? We’ll get the answer from rancher, microbiologist, and Democratic candidate for congress (WA-05), Peter Goldmark.

9PM: If I spoke out in favor of poisoning Supreme Court justices and killing congressman, or attacked 9/11 widows as “witches” and “harpies”… I’d be pretty damned marginalized. Whereas when Ann Coulter does it, she simply sells more books. Local author and blogger (Orcinus) David Neiwert has been tracking the steady drip of violent, right-wing extremist rhetoric into the mainstream, and he joins me for the Blogger Hour to try to answer the question: Why won’t Republicans disavow Ann Coulter?

Tune in tonight and give me a call: 1-877-710-KIRO (5476).

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Related

Comments

  1. 119

    sillyguy spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 4:56 pm

    Goldy

    You should invite Ann to your show.

  2. 120

    Daniel K spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 5:05 pm

    We don’t need no Ann Coulter pollution. Spare us that much.

  3. 121

    das spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 5:06 pm

    I think Ann is trying to address the progressive lefts’ tendency to foreclose all arguement by proximity to death. The widows’ husbands perished in 9/11 so don’t even try to counter with their views that Bush is responsible for it…

    Good luck to you and Neiwert coating yourselves as po’ little victims of right-wing meany talk – you of the Kos “screw them” of American contract workers butchered in Falujah, of darling Churchill’s little Eichmanns, of those beloved Democratic reps who have trotted out the Nazi imagery to describe the president, of the leadership in the NAACP, ditto the stream of calumny coming from Dixiewood entertainment Bush haters…

    Ah, yes, Sing to me of the super-sane left – such a trial to share the planet with those trash-talking righties;

    Try tackling a real issue: why are the left’s enemies such softballs? Radio wonks, civil servants and elected officials in free democracies;

    At least the right attempts taking on international mad-dog heartless religio fanatic killers…

  4. 122

    Will spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 5:21 pm

    das-

    Obvisouly, you’ve never served in the US armed forces. When private contractors go flat-hatting all over Iraq, get shot down and put the Army in the position on saving their asses, that’s what Kos was talking about. When a private in the US Army (paid about 15 grand) has to risk his life to save the ass of some paid mercenary (paid 120 grand), this is bullshit. I support the US Army. Chickenhawks like you support Blackwater Security.

  5. 123

    Josef in Marummy Country spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 5:25 pm

    I’m a Republican and I disavow me from Ann Coulter.

  6. 124

    righton spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 5:40 pm

    I’d love a serious discussion of the folly of declaring radio show talk as campaign contributions…

    of course if you guys insist that Kiro guys are violating laws…then lets add you to it

    (by the way Seattle Times owes a big fine for their front page hit piece to hlep out Maria….don’t tell me that wasn’t a lib wanting a lib, and writing an article to make it more likely)

  7. 125

    Green Thumb spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:02 pm

    Maybe Goldy should put Das on the air. That would be most illuminating. What do you say, Das? You seem to have a way with words.

  8. 126

    das spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:05 pm

    Will, all I know is that Kos unleashed his strongest vilification for the murdered rather than the murderers and that is pretty much standard operating procedure for Kos; I didn’t know the murdered violated a tenant of the left by making decent money – and that – unequal to US soldiers. According to the logic of the left that makes them deserve what they got. Lovely bunch, you guys.

  9. 127

    das spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:19 pm

    Green Thumb,

    I’ll take the compliment thanks, and return it to you and all the writers here with puzzlement as to why you dilute all your often good arguments with vagina lips and stuffed assholes and all that…I’ll gladly participate in Goldy’s show when he does a special show on lefty’s who have stopped being leftys. (That doesn’t mean I am a conservative or a wingnut righty; I’m not sure what I am but I am sure I am not of the current Bush-hating left cult); I’m not so good on the local politics; I found Goldy becuse he was well-informed on the doings of the Seattle school board…

  10. 128

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:24 pm

    Republicans won’t disavow Coulter because they’re just as sick, twisted, demented, violent, and sociopathic as she is.

  11. 129

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:26 pm

    3

    Have you guys ever considered taking on mad-dog heartless corporations? Oh wait — you guys ARE the mad-dog heartless corporations! (or wannabes)

  12. 130

    das spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:29 pm

    Again with the corporation as boogy man – you are better than that roger r

  13. 131

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:33 pm

    8

    “Lovely bunch, you guys.” Commentby das— 6/25/06@ 6:05 pm

    You guys use taxpayer money to pay mercenaries 120K a year while you won’t even pay for basic equipment for our uniformed troops.

    You guys invade another country on the pretext of overthrowing an evil dictator and bringing freedom and democracy to its people — then arrest, imprison, torture, and murder innocent civilians without a shred of due process.

    You guys kick in the doors of peoples’ homes and murder their women, children, and babies by firing military weapons into their heads at point-blank range.

    And then you have the balls to wrap Old Glory around all of this, and call yourselves “patriots.”

    Lovely bunch, you guys.

  14. 132

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:34 pm

    9

    “I’m not sure what I am” Commentby das— 6/25/06@ 6:19 pm

    Let me help you out with that — you’re a mental defective with your mouth where your asshole is supposed to be, and your asshole where your mouth is supposed to be.

  15. 133

    Will spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:36 pm

    das-

    I stand with the American soldier.

    You stand with the hired gun.

  16. 134

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 6:37 pm

    12

    We’ve had a bunch of CEOs running our government for five years, and the results speak for themselves. This is the worst government of the last 100 years.

  17. 135

    REP Pat Kennedy [D-Bitchslap the Black Security Guard At LAX] spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:02 pm

    Republican babe: Ann Coulter Democrat Babe: Helen Thomas Get the difference?

  18. 136

    BushWentAWOL spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:02 pm

    Ann Coulter is shit. She’s lower than shit – she’s whale shit. And if it weren’t illegal, I’d hope someone would kill the fucking AIDS-infested bitch! And anyone who doesn’t distance themselves from her, is no better.

    I’d pay money to get five minutes with the cunt to tell her what I think of her and her ilk.

  19. 137

    LeftTurn spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:03 pm

    Goldy be sure to invite Alaska’s Senatorial Candidate Mike McGavick to call the show. $100 says he doesn’t have the nutsack to do it.

  20. 138

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:03 pm

    GOP CAMPAIGN STRATEGY REVEALED

    Disenfranchise people of color. Interesting that they, themselves, believe they can “win” elections only by keeping American citizens from voting in their own country.

    “Don’t kid yourself: the Republican party’s decision yesterday to ‘delay’ the renewal of the Voting Rights Act has not a darn thing to do with objections of the Republican’s white sheets caucus. Complaints by a couple of good ol’ boys to legislation have never stopped the GOP leadership from rolling over dissenters.

    “This is a strategic stall that is meant to decriminalise the Republican party’s new game of challenging voters of colour by the hundreds of thousands.

    “In the 2004 presidential race, the GOP ran a massive, multi-state, multimillion-dollar operation to challenge the legitimacy of black, Hispanic and Native American voters. The methods used breached the Voting Rights Act, and while the Bush administration’s civil rights division grinned and looked the other way, civil rights lawyers began circling, preparing to sue to stop the violations of the act before the 2008 race.

    “So Republicans have promised to no longer break the law – not by going legit but by eliminating the law.

    “The act was passed in 1965 after the Ku Klux Klan and other upright citizens found they could use procedural tricks – ‘literacy tests’, poll taxes and more – to block citizens of colour from casting ballots.

    “Here is what happened in 2004, and what’s in store for 2008.

    “In the 2004 election, more than 3 million voters were challenged at the polls. No one had seen anything like it since the era of Jim Crow and burning crosses. In 2004, voters were told their registrations had been purged or that their addresses were ‘suspect’.

    “Denied the right to the regular voting booths, these challenged voters were given ‘provisional’ ballots. More than 1m of these provisional ballots (1,090,729 of them) were tossed in the electoral dumpster uncounted.

    “A funny thing about those ballots: about 88% were cast by minority voters.

    “This isn’t a number dropped on me from a black helicopter: they come from the raw data of the US election assistance commission in Washington DC.

    “At the heart of the GOP’s mass challenge of voters was what the party’s top brass called ‘caging lists’ – secret files of hundreds of thousands of voters, almost every one from a black-majority voting precinct.

    “When our investigations team, working for BBC TV, got our hands on these confidential files in October 2004, the Republicans told us the voters listed were their potential ‘donors’. Really? The sheets included pages of men from homeless shelters in Florida.

    “Donor lists, my ass. Every expert told us, these were ‘challenge lists’ meant to stop these black voters from casting ballots.

    “When these ‘caged’ voters arrived at the polls in November 2004, they found their registrations missing, their right to vote blocked or their absentee ballots rejected because their addresses were supposedly ‘fraudulent’.

    “Why didn’t the GOP honchos fess up to challenging these allegedly illegal voters? Because targeting voters of colour is against the law. The law in question is the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

    “The act says you can’t go after groups of voters if you choose your targets based on race. Given that almost all the voters on the GOP hit list are black, the illegal racial profiling is beyond even Karl Rove’s ability to come up with an alibi.

    “The Republicans target black folk not because they don’t like the colour of their skin; they don’t like the colour of their vote: Democrat. For that reason, the GOP included on its hit list Jewish retirement homes in Florida. Apparently, the GOP was also gunning for the Elderly of Zion.

    “These so-called ‘fraudulent’ voters, in fact, were not fraudulent at all. Page after page, as we have previously reported, are black soldiers sent overseas. The Bush campaign used their absence from their US homes to accuse them of voting from false addresses.

    “Now that the GOP has been caught breaking the voting rights law, it has found a way to keep using its expensively obtained ‘caging’ lists: let the law expire next year. If the Voting Rights Act dies in 2007, the 2008 race will be open season on dark-skinned voters. Only the renewal of the Voting Rights Act can prevent the planned racial wrecking of democracy.

    “Before the 2000 presidential ballot, then Jeb Bush purged thousands of Black citizens’ registrations on the grounds that they were ‘felons’ not entitled to vote. Our review of the files determined that the crime of most people on the list was nothing more than VWB — Voting While Black.

    “That ‘felon scrub’, as the state called it, had to be ‘pre-cleared’ under the Voting Rights Act. That is, the US justice department must approve “scrubs” and other changes in procedures.

    “The Florida felon scrub slipped through this ‘pre-clearance’ provision because Katherine Harris’s assistant assured the government the scrub was just a clerical matter. Civil rights lawyers are now on the alert for such mendacity.

    “The burning cross caucus of the Republican Party is bitching that ‘pre-clearance’ of voting changes applies only to southern states. I have to agree that singling out the old confederacy is a bit unfair. But the solution is not to smother the voting rights law but to spread its safeguards to all 50 of these United States.

    “Republicans argue that the racial voting games and the threats of the white-hooded Klansmen that kept African-Americans from the ballot box before the 1965 passage of the Voting Rights Act no longer threaten black voters.

    “That’s true. When I look over the ‘”caging lists’ and the ‘scrub sheets’, it’s clear to me that the GOP has traded in white sheets for spreadsheets.”

    http://commentisfree.guardian......to_bu.html

  21. 139

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:04 pm

    This paragraph bears repeating:

    “Page after page, as we have previously reported, are black soldiers sent overseas. The Bush campaign used their absence from their US homes to accuse them of voting from false addresses.”

    REPUBLICANS DON’T SUPPORT THE TROOPS — THEY DISENFRANCHISE THEM.

  22. 140

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:06 pm

    Hey trollfucks! How many of you America-hating fascists have supported the troops by buying a helmet upgrade kit for a soldier in Afghanistan or Iraq? http://www.operation-helmet.org/

    Yeah, I thought so. All mouth, no money.

  23. 141

    RUFUS Fitzgerald Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:06 pm

    Fracine Busby stated the Democtatic strategy to win in 06. Actually the dems have been doing this for the last 100 years, no need to change now.

  24. 142

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:08 pm

    18

    Why are you insulting whales? Whales are our friends. Even their shit is benign, compared to Coulter. One more thing — if I paid money for 5 minutes with that whore, I wouldn’t waste that time on talk.

  25. 143

    Will spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:32 pm

    Rick is slightly retarded.

  26. 144

    Observer spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:35 pm

    Das-

    No, Roger is no better than that. Bitter, bitter old loser man.

  27. 145

    REP Pat Kennedy [D-Bitchslap the Black Security Guard At LAX] spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:37 pm

    Ann Coulter is shit. She’s lower than shit – she’s whale shit. And if it weren’t illegal, I’d hope someone would kill the fucking AIDS-infested bitch! And anyone who doesn’t distance themselves from her, is no better.

    I’d pay money to get five minutes with the cunt to tell her what I think of her and her ilk.

    Commentby BushWentAWOL [……………………………………………………………..Gee, Where is the Democrat “love”? BTW, BushWentAWOL, I’ll bet Ann can smack the shit out of a pussy like you!]

  28. 146

    REP Pat Kennedy [D-Bitchslap the Black Security Guard At LAX] spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:38 pm

    Roger, Does Helen Thomas like it on top?

  29. 147

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:41 pm

    9.

    das, you are a fool.

    You have proven, through your demonstrated ignorance of liberal ideals, that you were never a liberal. You have the common wingnut idea that youth and liberalism are synonymous. This stems from an old jibe from Sir Winston Churchill, and nut cakes, like you, have taken it as revealed truth. It was a joke son.

    This misinformed state about liberals melds into another situation your post at #9 and #12 reveals. That is you suffer from a common failing among conservatives, an inability to perceive irony, sarcasm and satire. It is hard to state why this is so, perhaps it is genetic, although P. J. O’rourke seems to get it. Maybe the fault lies elsewhere…

  30. 148

    Observer spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:44 pm

    No, Hairy Turtle, you are the fool, over, and over again.

  31. 149

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:54 pm

    30.

    There is a difference between happiness and wisdom: he that thinks himself the happiest man is really so; but he that thinks himself the wisest is generally the greatest fool.

  32. 150

    Rufus\'s Winking Weenie spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 7:56 pm

    Harry, I think the fault lies primarily with the public school system. Quick, now: How many teachers in your entire K-12 career had a sense of humor? I can remember maybe two. Look what happened to me.

  33. 151

    Mark the Red Dick spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:02 pm

    I’d like to weigh in on this, Harry. My sense — and here I speak with the authority of someone who has earned four degrees — is that the fault lies with the liberal media.

    Look at the TV news shows. How many times did you ever see a shred of irony coming from Brokaw, Rather or Jennings? Never, I say!

    Liberals didn’t discover humor until Jon Stewart escaped from a mental institution, took refuge in a TV studio, and got the bright idea of holding hostage a camera. Get this: His show was a complete accident!

  34. 152

    Proud of My Hairy Ass spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:08 pm

    Funny you should mention irony, Harry. A recent study produced by the Institute for the Extermination of Liberalism shows that iberals have a 56 percent less capacity for irony than Wall Street conservatives, 73 percent less capacity than cultural conservatives, and 103 percent less capacity than neo-Nazi conservatives.

    This clearly proves that you are not only wrong, Harry, but sadly lacking in irony yourself. Perhaps you should start going to church.

  35. 153

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:11 pm

    32, 33

    Excellent theories, although I’d say if #33 is the cause, that it would be proof positive that the media is not liberal.

  36. 154

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:15 pm

    We’ll disavow Ann Coulter when you guys disavow Michael Moore, Barbra Streisand, Alec Baldwin, The Dixie Chicks, and Algore.

    Why is it OK for you guys to drip violent kook crap and somehow when we tell the fucking truth you have a problem with it.

    Typical fucking moonbat hypocrites…

  37. 155

    Janet SS spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:18 pm

    Harry, I usually like to stick to my talking points, but I must digress long enough to tell you that I am a sophisticated consumer of irony. Not sarcasm, which is unlady-like. Not satire, which is the common man’s opera. But irony and me, well we go way back.

    I remember the first time I met irony. It made me laugh so hard I blushed. It even made me a tad wet down there. Wow

  38. 156

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:20 pm

    36.

    Tell us, oh wonder of the four degrees, of the transgressions of those on your list of hateful lefties.

  39. 157

    Mark the Red Dick spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:22 pm

    And another thing, H-a-r-r-y. We will disavow Adolph Hitler when you guys disavow FDR. He was a fascist pig, you know.

  40. 158

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:23 pm

    That was Joe Kennedy, wasn’t it?

  41. 159

    Mark the Red Dick spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:25 pm

    Clearly you don’t know your history like I do, Harry.

  42. 160

    Anonymous spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:27 pm

    Will, I stand with anyone with a finger on a loaded gun pointed at terrorists.

    Harry, you seem obessed about my cofessed past, as a hard core, true-blue leftist; I was and someday we’ll have the opportunity for you to examine my bonafides; trouble is I still feel like a liberal; after 9/11 though, all my liberal friends whooshed past me into a nut-land of HalliburtonBush-Hitlerville, while the rough beast slouched towards Bethlehem, born and devouring as he went.

    Why do you hate conservatives more than the jihad terrorists? Isn’t that a kind of luxury? the kind of cost-free hatred that you can perform in the comfort of your computer room? Just curious…

  43. 161

    BushWentAWOL spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:37 pm

    Why do you hate conservatives more than the jihad terrorists?

    Simple – the so-called conservatives ARE the terrorists. And should be exterminated.

  44. 162

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:42 pm

    42

    “all my liberal friends whooshed past me into a nut-land of HalliburtonBush-Hitlerville”

    Screeeeeech … hit the brakes! Republicans have squandered 2,500 American lives and half a trillion dollars in a war against a country that had NOTHING to do with 9/11 or terrorism … and you think the liberals who question the GOP’s lies and incompetence are in “nut-land”?

    My friend, you seriously need help.

  45. 163

    Anonymouse spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:43 pm

    Why would I need help when I’ve already been found? Have you found Jesus, Roger? It would help your constipation.

  46. 164

    das spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:52 pm

    There is something in the conservative position that elicits all this leftoid fetor; Goldy’s Palace guards here are far more excercised against pro-Bush forces than terrorists; that tells me that they bask in a vast sense of luxurious self-righteous anger about the world; anger is just that = a luxury; there is a certain 2-year old charm in all the diaper rash going on here; you guys poop out fetor and explitives with the abandon of happy infants…but…there is an enemy and it isn’t Bush or Republicans; to the degree that you continue to believe this lark your world lies untouched by the terrorist monster…

  47. 165

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:55 pm

    das must be smokin’ crack!!!

  48. 166

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:57 pm

    If terrorists hate freedom and democracy, why aren’t they blowing up buildings in Sweden?

  49. 167

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:57 pm

    42.

    my liberal friends whooshed past me into a nut-land of HalliburtonBush-Hitlerville, while the rough beast slouched towards Bethlehem, born and devouring as he went.

    Clearly, I have no idea who your friends are, but as a life-liberal who first voted in 1962, the position of liberals in my circle was that the routing of the Taliban and destruction of al-Quada camps on Afghanistan was A-OK and curtailed before the job, capture of the guys on the top (bin Laden and his lieutenants) was complete.

    Instead, a job was left undone there, and the U. S. then focused on enemy that had been incapacitated by ten years of military action against them, Iraq.

    I do not see how this was of personnel and materiel in any way stems terrorism. In fact, the evidence is ample that terrorism has grown as a result of our excursion in Iraq.

    Instead of enhacing the security of shipping containers, nuclear installations and chemical plants, I am told that intercepting terabytes of personal data and communication records about U. S. citizens enhances my safety from terrorist attack. That arresting a U. S. citizen to eventually charge him with making a contribution to a charity, and that charity that then may have given money to an al-Qaeda connected organization is somehow a protection against terrorist.

    Instead of dealing with a North Korean foe, who now has both the weapon and the delivery system, I see the administration becoming less and less effective in their dealing with the foe. Turning its attention to Iran, that does not have a weapon or delivery system.

    To have you say that disagreeing with a very inefectual effort that costs a nation’s ransom and enriches industry atop the bones of the dead is, somehow, cheering on the terrorists is so illogical, it’s hard to think you ever thought any differently.

    so, don’t be so disrespectful as to assert that 9/11, as horrible as that event was, was an epiphany for you that drives you to post as you do here. That story doesn’t hold water.

  50. 168

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 8:59 pm

    The religious right hates freedom and democracy. Right wing nuts who murder abortion doctors are terrorists. The KKK conservatives who recently burned a 22 foot cross to intimidate Mexicans are terrorists. I could go on like this forever, das , because you and your kind are terrorists.

  51. 169

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:01 pm

    I do not see how this waste of personnel and…

  52. 170

    Robert C Byrd-Democrat US Senator West Virginia spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:07 pm

    The KKK conservatives who recently burned a 22 foot cross to intimidate Mexicans are terrorists.

    Commentby L-Mur Phd.— 6/25/06@ 8:59 pm

    For crying out loud. That was my fund raiser dipshit. Geeeesh

  53. 171

    skagit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:10 pm

    Would someone suggest a lobotomy for Beverly in Burien? She gets a tad overwrought on the radio.

  54. 172

    RUFUS Fitzgerald Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:11 pm

    Hahahaha

    These dems keep on hanging themselves with the KKK stuff.

  55. 173

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:19 pm

    I’m not gonna call tonight — I can’t speak for eastern Washington folks — but I’ll post the following observations here.

    First, there are people in eastern Washington who will vote Republican no matter what. To hell with them. Democrats should worry about how they can support the one-third of eastern Washington voters who vote Democratic. We need to educate ourselves about their issues, support them on things like gun rights, and in general make it possible for them to support our candidates by not antagonizing them. Even if they can’t elect Democrats to local offices, we need their votes to win statewide contests. They’re important, and we need to make sure they know that we understand that.

    Second, there’s nothing we can do about people like Beverly (or whatever her name was), who called in to Goldy’s show and started shrieking about abortion. Like Beverly (or whatever her name is), I believe abortion is morally wrong. But there’s a host of moral issues in politics, and Republicans are on the wrong side of most of them. Emotion-driven single-issue voters like Beverly (or whatever her name is), who wilfully blind themselves to the GOP’s incompetence and corruption, can’t be reasoned with. Also, people who support abortion rights have as much right as she does to have their views represented by a political party, and to have a say in what our laws are, and how we govern our country. What Beverly (or whatever her name is) wants the Democratic Party to do is cave in to her temper tantrum. The DP’s answer to that should be, “no.” And my answer to Beverly (or whatever her name is) is, you can be an anti-abortion Democrat. I am. That puts you on the right side of the moral issues facing our country. The Democratic Party is a big tent. There’s room under it for disparate views.

    Finally, I think it’s totally unrealistic for conservative, anti-government, eastern Washington Republicans to think they can run this state. They’re only about 13% of the state’s population. Furthermore, everything they have over there exists because of Democratic policies, and everything they do over there is subsidized by urban taxes. If they don’t like our money, then let’s stop sending it to them.

  56. 174

    righton spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:25 pm

    roger; you move to e. washington..? looking for that elusive 3% of our energy?

  57. 175

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:26 pm

    Dave Niewert is talking about the “eliminationist rhetoric” of people like Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin. Maybe wingers think it’s a big fucking joke. Guess what, righties, we liberals think you motherfuckers mean what you say. That makes you “terrorists” and “Nazis.” Read whatever implications you want into that.

  58. 176

    das spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:33 pm

    49.

    Well said Harry, well said, though I disagree will all your premises. I especially liked your last two sentences (the writing not the sentiment);

    It is hard to talk to you and roger because you keep putting forth all these “Grail” sentences posing as arguement but, in reality, they are not;

    You think you gain high ground – shutting my mouth – by mentioning the 2500 hundred dead over and over as though you owned these lives now gone, now sacrificed for us. Again, this is a leftist tactic to foreclose on the whole issue of Iraq by appealing to the dead. These dead soldiers are important to you insofar as their deadness helps you to foreclose your argument about Iraq; See, dead soldiers; Iraq no good. Well pick a number and stand in line because these men and women soldiers were lots of things before being snared as a cipher in your frustrated arguing about Iraq. These men and women had committed themselves voluntarily to military vows, to an elected civilian commander in chief; these are sacred and ancient vows made more so now because they are voluntary. The nail in the head of the left is that the military is a volunteer military. And no amount of sneering and yes, blaspheme upon their vows and purpose will change that. You think by screaming about the military dead you are implicating those of us committed to the war in Iraq – again another leftist quest for purity.

    another thing that is weird about the left: you’re so eager to scream about the dead soldiers and you are so eager to believe they walk into houses to shoot women and children in the head. What is the matter with you?

  59. 177

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:34 pm

    36, 38

    No list from Redneck. He never delivers on anything. Wagers, backup data, explanations about what the hell he’s talking about.

    No there, there.

  60. 178

    Tree Frog Farmer spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:38 pm

    Beverly is a crank. She is more than a little cracked on the subject of abortion. She also has some truly wierd raps about Catholicism.

  61. 179

    Tree Frog Farmer spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:42 pm

    TrulyStinkyRipeone@56 Just look out of your car on the road to Wallula at the wind farm.

  62. 180

    Public Service Announcement spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:48 pm

    THIS JUST IN FROM THE DESK OF
    MARK THE RED DICK:

    Oh, people of such small minds,
    I have a secret for you
    that I will now reveal
    about the great mystery of global warming.

    There is no new scientific data you can show me,
    for mine is supremely
    above all else.

    I am no mere commenter here;
    I am the Minister of Global Warming Truth.
    Behold my genius!

    I am the Kingdom,
    the Power,
    and the Glory,
    for Ever and Ever.

    Amen.

  63. 181

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:51 pm

    58.

    blaspheme

    You are a true student of double-speak.

    War profiteers extracting billions of dollars while U. S. soldiers and marines are blown up with IEDs is what, good business? Patriotism?

    Pointing out that this is done is blasphemy.

    Who or what is the sacred entity in this case?

  64. 182

    Tree Frog Farmer spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:51 pm

    I guess D’Ass is going to disavow himself from Ann Coulter and Pat Robertson:
    “At least the right attempts taking on international mad-dog heartless religio fanatic killers…

    Commentby das— 6/25/06

    Or perhaps such a small, baby step toward sanity is beyond his bold rhetoric.

  65. 183

    Smedley Butler, Brig. General, USMC, ret. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:55 pm

    The normal profits of a business concern in the United States are six, eight, ten, and sometimes even twelve per cent. But wartime profits-ah! that is another matter-twenty, sixty, one hundred, three hundred, and even eighteen hundred per cent-the sky is the limit. All that the traffic will bear. Uncle Sam has the money. Let’s get it.
    Of course, it isn’t put that crudely in war time. It is dressed up into speeches about patriotism, love of country, and “we must put our shoulder to the wheel,” but the profits jump and leap and skyrocket-and are safely pocketed.

  66. 184

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 9:56 pm

    58.

    Are you speaking of the end of days, das?

    Is this excursion in Iraq a Holy mission to you?

    In order to protect Bethlehem, are we to leave our cities undefended?

  67. 185

    Smedley Butler, Brig. General, USMC, ret. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:05 pm

    Another impressive job by Goldy on the Ray-Dee-Oh. It’s really good to hear adults discuss Ideas on the radio, for a change.

  68. 186

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:07 pm

    Thank you, General Butler. Another quote of yours I take to heart is this:

    When he [the returning soldier] returned home minus an eye, or a leg, or his mind broken, they suffered too — as much as and even sometimes more than he. Yes, and they, too, contributed their dollars to the profits that the munitions makers and bankers and shipbuilders and manufacturers and speculators made…And even now the families of the wounded men and of the mentally broken and those who never were able to readjust themselves are still suffering and still paying.

    Careful, Gen. Butler, das may spit on your grave and accuse you of blasphemy.

  69. 187

    Sir Irony of Burien spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:12 pm

    General Butler, if you keep at it then Horse’s Ass will start reading like that vulgar, satanic blog, “Sadly, No!”

    Perish the thought.

    Perhaps you should go into advertising copy writing, where you talents could find full measure.

  70. 188

    Smedley Butler, Brig. General, USMC, ret. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:18 pm

    It would have been far cheaper (not to say safer) for the average American who pays the bills to stay out of foreign entanglements. For a very few, this racket, like boot-legging and other underworld rackets, brings fancy profits, but the cost of operations is always transferred to the people-who do not profit.

  71. 189

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:21 pm

    das, you must be smokin’ crack!

  72. 190

    Seattle Mommie spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:25 pm

    But General Butler Sir, won’t our entire way of life collapse like an iceberg into a warming sea of unanticipated consequences if we dump our old friend, the Permanent Wartime Economy? Or have I been duped by the miltary-industrial complex and its fellow travelers in the MSM?

  73. 191

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:26 pm

    Apparently I’m not the only one wondering why Coulter hasn’t been disbarred for publicly advocating the murder of judges and other public officials. Liberal blogger Taylor Marsh is wondering the same thing. http://www.taylormarsh.com/arc.....hp?id=1797

    Yes, I realize Coulter isn’t making her living by practicing law, and lifting her attorney’s license would be merely symbolic. You can say exactly the same thing about Bill Clinton, but that doesn’t stop wingers from making a big deal of Clinton’s suspension from the Arkansas bar for lying to a grand jury about his affair with Monica Lewinsky. The “attorney” title — which Coulter is entitled to — gives her credibility she doesn’t deserve. And letting someone like her have the license is a black mark on the entire legal profession. Attorneys are officers of the court, and simply can’t display the disrespect for judges that Coulter does. It is in the best interests of the legal profession and our system of justice that Ann Coulter not remain an attorney.

    You’d think with all the trial lawyers in the Democratic Party, somebody would file a complaint against her. I’m not sure where she’s licensed; I assume New York, because that’s where she was (briefly) in private practice. It’s also possible she was licensed by Michigan, because that’s where she went to law school.

    Since I’m a Washington lawyer, I can guarantee you that Coulter does not meet the character and fitness requirements for admission to our state bar. She could never get a license here, thank God. But my point is, she shouldn’t be licensed anywhere.

    Disbarring Ann Coulter would send a message: You can’t incite public hatred against judges and the courts, because that undermines the administration of justice. And if you do — you can’t be an attorney. Disbarring Ann Coulter would send another message to the general public: Coulter is a fringie of low character who is not fit to practice law, and is not worth listening to.

    Somebody in the Democratic bar needs to get cracking on this.

  74. 192

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:27 pm

    das: Are you Kevin Carns? Only a propagandist like Carns would so blatantly distort the views of people who disagree with the Iraq policy of the Bush mis-administration. This policy has meant nothing but disaster for this country.

    Iraq is bad because:

    1) it wasn’t necessary, Iraq was a negligible threat
    2) it has cost this country countless billion in treasure
    3) it has cost this country the good will of much of the world
    4) it has exhausted the resources of the U.S. military
    5) it has cost 10 of thousands of Iraqi lives
    6) it has maimed and traumatized many more thousands of Iraqis
    7) it has maimed and traumatized thousands of Americans
    8) over 2500 Americans are dead

    Have I missed anything?

  75. 193

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:30 pm

    What about that conservative guy who blew up the Federal building. You know, the young “conservative” they had to execute. And what about that fine, patriotic young “conservative” who blew those innocent people up at the Atlanta Olympics. “Pro-Life” — that’s what he called himself. And what about those conservative Democrats in the 60’s who switched to the Republican Party after the Democratic leadership backed the Civil Rights Bill? You know, das, the ones who call themselves “Christians”?

    The difference between a real Christian and a Republican Christian is that a real Christian tries to model his life after Christ, but a Republican “Christian” is not judged on his behavior, but on his willingness to “believe” fantastic folktales about people who rise from the dead andf such.

    I guess that’ Robert Byrd’s fault as well?

  76. 194

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:32 pm

    Conservative yellow-cake REPUBLICANS are terrorists.

    Rick Santorum is a flat out crazy ass bitch!!!

  77. 195

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:32 pm

    Conservatives are terrorists…

  78. 196

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:35 pm

    Click here for artist’s rendition of Ann Coulter disbarment proceeding. http://www.adhb30.dsl.pipex.com/100war_joa2.jpg

  79. 197

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:39 pm

    Oh RR, you big kidder you!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    That’s a good ‘un.

  80. 198

    Green Thumb spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:41 pm

    Clueless @ 74, whoever das is, I suspect he isn’t Carns. The latter seems to be more interested in state politics, and (if I’m guessing right) has a pretty crass approach to propagandizing. Das seems to have more national/international interests, and he’s a more nuanced wordsmith. Perhaps das is affiliated with one of the national Republican spin-control outfits.

    I profoundly disagree with das’s arguments, but I’d rather read him than the contentless carpet bombings of JCH or the trailer park bellowing of MTR.

  81. 199

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:49 pm

    das is a smooth-balled, needle-prick buttfucker — who just happens to be a conservative terrorist.

  82. 200

    das spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:51 pm

    All,

    A beautiful cacophony of leftoid cliche (I especially loved mommy’s 70’s beaut – Permanent Wartime Economy – that’s a chestnut to warm the heart of any dreadlocked drum circle! : the once powerful progressive ideas that were to transform the world now reduced to sneering at journalists and elected officials and those who disagree with them; and narry a word against the jihad terrorists who would gleefully cut leftoid throats…
    1) it wasn’t necessary, Iraq was a negligible threat
    Right. Leftist dreaming.
    2) it has cost this country countless billion in treasure
    Wait till things really crank up. In WWII we spent 30% of the GNP on war; we’re nowhere near than yet.
    3) it has cost this country the good will of much of the world
    We never had the goodwill of the people who write for newspapers in foreign countries; america bashing is oldtime religion among the writer classes of the world; on the other hand the world’s poor are dying to get here;
    4) it has exhausted the resources of the U.S. military
    which US Military?
    5) it has cost 10 of thousands of Iraqi lives
    terrorists kill, that’s what they do…
    6) it has maimed and traumatized many more thousands of Iraqis
    terrorists are having a field day in Iraq
    7) it has maimed and traumatized thousands of Americans
    who happen to be volunteer soldiers committed to this fight;
    8) over 2500 Americans are dead
    See post 58. You don’t care about the soldiers except as dead soldiers – only as an illustration for your argument; the live soldiers you slander and accuse of murder and heap any kind of defamatory innuendo upon them – do don’t give me your dead soldier bit, bub.

  83. 201

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:57 pm

    Nice dodge, das, but who is the Holy entity you say we are blapheming?

    It’s your statement, what do you mean?

  84. 202

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:58 pm

    Here we thought these kooks were from [un]SP, and they’re coming from the Discovery Institute.

  85. 203

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 10:59 pm

    80 – you’re probably right. At the end of the day, however, Das is just as crass IMO. He tars everyone with the brush of all the far left ‘isms’, i.e. Maoism, Stalinism, Marxism, etc. He pronounce the views of people here as both “scary” and “childish” which smacks of both megalomania and paranoia.

    His judgements are an ugly smear of the people here. I find the liberal commenters here quite moderate in their views. If we get a little excited it’s only because the current political leadership of the federal government is so godawful bad.

  86. 204

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:00 pm

    80

    Carns is paid to promote the pro-developer agenda of the BIAW.

  87. 205

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:00 pm

    82.

    See 22.

  88. 206

    Tree Frog Farmer spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:02 pm

    D’ass starts to show his truly psychotic colors. . .his talking points are dissolving even as he types them in to the ‘puter. It’s not ‘cut-n-run’ when General Casey speaks of a draw down. And when present and former members of the Joint Chief’s of Staff speak of “breaking the military” D’Ass in his omniscient knowledge of all things military says it is not so. . .
    Perhaps his knowledge of the military is as extensive as Karl Roves knowledge of his boy-toy Gannon Gukert.

  89. 207

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:03 pm

    re 82: Don’t give das more credit than he’s due. He’s an idiot with a Roget’s Thesaurus, a Conservative terrorist, a smooth-balled, needle-pricked buttfucker — all in the name of our sweet bleeding Lord, Jesus Christ — the 6 minute dinosaur.

  90. 208

    L-Mur Phd. spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:04 pm

    If you snatch away das Thesaurus the pustulating primal hatred will soon appear.

    Conservatism is all about hate and fear and corporatism.

  91. 209

    Janet S spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:26 pm

    I don’t know who posted 37, but it wasn’t me. I actually know how to spell my name. And I post under the same name, instead of making up new ones and hiding behind them.

    As for goldy-radio – why would I want to listen to a bunch of guys sitting around agreeing with each other? Is goldy afraid to have someone on that might say something other than what he wants to hear? Believe it or not, people can disagree with reasoned argument and come out with everyone learning something new. (But you wouldn’t know it by those here who shout down everyone who disagrees with them.)

  92. 210

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:26 pm

    A beautiful cacophony of leftoid cliche

    Which you answer with bankrupt rightist talking points.

    the jihad terrorists who would gleefully cut leftoid throats…

    Perfect example.

    1) Right. Leftist dreaming.

    So was S.H. involved in 9/11? Despite Cheney’s bloviations, not even Bush went so far. Did Britain and the U.S. patrol the southern and northern frontiers of Iraq? Did they bomb at will?

    2) Wait till things really crank up. In WWII we spent 30% of the GNP on war; we’re nowhere near than yet.

    I’m reminded of Shakespeare – ’tis a dream devoutly to be wished.. Well is it das?

    3)We never had the goodwill of the people who write for newspapers in foreign countries; america bashing is oldtime religion among the writer classes of the world; on the other hand the world’s poor are dying to get here;

    Sigh. Countless before and after opinion surveys bear this out despite people’s economic aspirations.

    4) which US Military?

    Army and Marines. It appears the navy and air force have been mostly saved for Iran.

    5) terrorists kill, that’s what they do…

    American bombs kill as well. Even most precision munitions miss their targets. People are run over every time re-supply convoys come up from Kuwait.

    6) terrorists are having a field day in Iraq

    So is modern american weaponry and tactics which are poorly suited to a military occupation.

    7) who happen to be volunteer soldiers committed to this fight;

    Who depend on the political leadership to send them into battle only when it’s absolutely necessary.

    8) See post 58. You don’t care about the soldiers except as dead soldiers – only as an illustration for your argument; the live soldiers you slander and accuse of murder and heap any kind of defamatory innuendo upon them – do don’t give me your dead soldier bit, bub.

    The ugly rantings of an ugly mind. Soldiers are driven to commit atrocities in every war – that’s why war should be an absolute last resort. I’ve seen interviews with Iraq veterans expressing the opinion that the whole country should be carpet-bombed to “start over” “better that than a shithole”. I don’t condemn them in the least for that sentiment. I save my condemnation for the poor excuses for leaders who sent them there.

  93. 211

    das spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:26 pm

    Who gives a damn about who das is? What does it matter? Try to answer some of my thoughts and arguments rather than sitting around saying, “he’s a wordsmith for the Republicans.”

    This much is true: I still feel like I am some kind of liberal in that I favor civilization over barbarism; I am a former lefty in that I used to believe all the things you guys believe here but not anymore. I am not a Republican and only voted for one Republican in my whole life: W in 04.

    It doesn’t matter who I am.

  94. 212

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:32 pm

    das @ 82

    You call that a response? God…whoever is paying you, even if it is only a penny/hour, is paying too much. You are a fucking idiot!

  95. 213

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:36 pm

    das @ 93

    ‘Who gives a damn about who das is? What does it matter? Try to answer some of my thoughts and arguments rather than sitting around saying, “he’s a wordsmith for the Republicans.”’

    Hey, dipshit, this is a liberal blog. Why the fuck would we be at all interested in engaging you in any sort of debate? Why would a wingnut (or incipient wingnut, assuming your claims are true) like you bother posting here?

  96. 214

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:38 pm

    93.

    You have said nothing, you only attack.

    If you voted for Bush because of some fantasy that you were fighting terrorism, you were wrong. If you voted in Washington, there was no great harm done. You were in the minority. If you voted in Iowa, New Mexico, or Ohio, go see a Priest.

    He’ll give you absolution you won’t get here.

  97. 215

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:49 pm

    82

    Man, this is gonna be TOO easy.

    “1) it wasn’t necessary, Iraq was a negligible threat
    “Right. Leftist dreaming.

    No facts here; just rightwing rant — “leftist dreaming.” How so? What was the threat, das? Can you specify one? Iraq had no WMDs; no ICBMs, bombers, or submarines to deliver WMDs; no nuclear weapons, no nuclear reactor, no nuclear program; no interest in attacking the U.S. (Saddam only wanted to coerce his neighbors); no Al Qaida training camps, and no Al Qaida terrorists (Saddam and Osama were on the outs with each other; in addition, terrorists would be potential rivals and a threat to Saddam’s regime); and Saddam couldn’t possibly invade Kuwait or Saudi Arabia while they were under American protection.

    Saddam was, at most, a pain in the ass.

    “2) it has cost this country countless billion in treasure
    “Wait till things really crank up. In WWII we spent 30% of the GNP on war; we’re nowhere near than yet.

    Actually, the billions Bush has spent on his war CAN be counted — about 300 billion of direct spending so far, and estimated indirect costs to the American economy of around a trillion dollars.

    The Iraq war is a contributing factor to high oil prices, and Bush’s deficit financing of the war will lead to inflation, high interest rates, and high unemployment. In addition, the money diverted for war spending (plus future interest payments on the new debt) can’t be used for things that benefit the American people here at home.

    “3) it has cost this country the good will of much of the world
    W”e never had the goodwill of the people who write for newspapers in foreign countries; america bashing is oldtime religion among the writer classes of the world; on the other hand the world’s poor are dying to get here;

    This statement is simply false; a lie. America liberated Europe and the Pacific from Hitler and Tojo, and for decades defended the Free World against Soviet domination. We were considered “a beacon of hope” in the world. Thanks to Bush and his followers, those countries now regard the U.S. as a warmonger and bully.

    “4) it has exhausted the resources of the U.S. military
    “which US Military?

    Your reply, das, is beyond stupid — it lacks meaning. It says nothing. Perhaps you thought it clever; but it is merely banal and vacuous. While I don’t agree that Iraq has sapped U.S. military resources — our nuclear deterrent is uninvolved in Iraq and remains unimpaired, and the bulk of our conventional forces are NOT in Iraq and are either performing garrison duty in various locations or are in CONUS and available for deployment in a crisis — neverthless Iraq is hurting morale in the volunteer military, is consuming equipment, fuel, personnel, munitions, and other resources, and is a hindrance on tactical flexibility if the military finds itself in the position of having to respond to a crisis elsewhere.

    “5) it has cost 10 of thousands of Iraqi lives
    “terrorists kill, that’s what they do…

    It’s true that U.S. military operations in Iraq have killed thousands of civilians. How many thousands is debated. It’s not true that Iraq has anything to do with “terrorists.” It may be that some terrorists are now operating in Iraq, thanks to the U.S. creating the opportunity for them to do so. But the so-called “insurgency” — a misnomer — mostly consists of people trying to throw a foreign invader out of their country. The run-of-the-mill fighters attacking our troops are not “terrorists,” they are an opposing military force, which is employing guerilla tactics and therefore its fighters can aptly be called “guerillas.” It’s also correct to call them “the enemy.”

    “6) it has maimed and traumatized many more thousands of Iraqis
    “terrorists are having a field day in Iraq”

    An inflated claim. Such terrorists as are able to operate in Iraq are too few in number and too lacking in resources to have a significant impact on the course of events.

    “7) it has maimed and traumatized thousands of Americans
    “who happen to be volunteer soldiers committed to this fight”

    This is true of some of our military personnel, but not all of them. Those held in the military against their will under “stop loss” can’t be considered volunteers; they’re effectively conscripts. Obviously, the hundreds of American soldiers who have deserted aren’t committed to this fight; and thousands more who are complaining about repeated deployments to Iraq don’t seem very “committed to this fight,” either. The dissension is even reaching into the ranks of retired generals. Even within the military, there is nowhere near unanimous support for continued involvement in Iraq.

    “8) over 2500 Americans are dead
    “See post 58. You don’t care about the soldiers except as dead soldiers – only as an illustration for your argument; the live soldiers you slander and accuse of murder and heap any kind of defamatory innuendo upon them – do don’t give me your dead soldier bit, bub.

    This statement, along with your post @58, is beneath contempt and frankly if you said something like that to my face you would regret it. First of all, you rightwing motherfuckers don’t own the military; we’re all responsible for America’s soldiers. As citizens, we have the right and obligation to inquire about the wisdom of committing them to battle, and spending their lives on questionable military actions. Whether you like it or not, this is a democracy, and you don’t have the right to silence critics or opponents. Secondly, the death of a single American soldier is an occasion of sadness and sorrowness, made especially keen by a sense that this loss of life is senseless, pointless, and profitless. It certainly has nothing to do with fighting the bastards who attacked us on 9/11.

    Keep drinking the rightwing kool-aid; you fuckers have divided our country, sown hatreds among our own people, and undermined the troops you claim to support.

    The ugly fact is, rightwingers don’t support the troops. You’re not willing to pay taxes to buy even basic battle gear for the soldiers in the field. Your party tried to cut their combat pay, and cut veterans benefits. All of your party’s leaders are people who copped out of military service when it was their turn to serve — and you vote for these draft dodgers and deserters.

    I donated $99 to http://www.operation-helmet.org/ to buy one (1) helmet upgrade kit for a soldier serving in Afghanistan or Iraq. This should be the government’s responsibility, but our government is failing our troops in the field, so it’s up to us as private citizens to buy the equipment for the troops that our government won’t purchase for them. What have you contributed to this cause, wingfuck? Nothing, I’ll bet. You’re nothing but a mouth. I repeat: YOU’RE NOTHING BUT A MOUTH. Empty suit. All hat, no cattle. A flat tire where the rubber meets the road. That’s you. From now on, whenever you claim to “support the troops,” I’m going to mock you, because you deserve to be mocked.

    You don’t support the troops. You’re USING the troops — for your own selfish ends. Fuck you, traitor bastard.

  98. 216

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:58 pm

    61

    Don’t expect that idiot to know anything; he doesn’t read newspapers. Hell, he can’t even read the billboards.

  99. 217

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/25/06 at 11:59 pm

    If righton drove past Wallula, he’d probably think those wind turbines are orchard heaters to keep the wheat from freezing.

  100. 218

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:02 am

    64

    D’Ass is all hat, no cattle. If he believes in the Iraq war, why doesn’t he enlist?

  101. 219

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:03 am

    65

    And that doesn’t even count bribery and theft.

  102. 220

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:03 am

    The real purpose of the Iraq war was to line the pockets of the GOP’s contractor friends.

  103. 221

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:09 am

    93

    What part of your thoughts and arguments did you fail to answer?

    The only reason we’re wondering who D’Ass is, is because we thought there might be a public safety issue unless you receive appropriate intervention.

  104. 222

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:10 am

    correction to 103

    Should read: What part of your thoughts and arguments did we fail to answer?

  105. 223

    das spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:12 am

    Like I said, there is much much more anger here directed towards your beloved countrymen who disagree with you than with the jihad murderers who would gleefully cut your throats.

    I don’t understand that. It is a mystery.

    That is my gift to you; a chance to examine yourselves; to know yourselves further.

    Signing off. Adios.
    -das

  106. 224

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:13 am

    95

    “Why would a wingnut (or incipient wingnut, assuming your claims are true) like you bother posting here?” Commentby dj— 6/25/06@ 11:36 pm

    That’s a good question, and one worthy of a psychology study. D’Ass might make a good lab rat. We should hook some wires up to him and turn on the shock machine. Maybe he’s after cheese.

  107. 225

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:14 am

    105

    We don’t have to live next door to the jihadists, but we have to live next door to you.

  108. 226

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:15 am

    105

    Seriously, turdfuck, do you really believe you can say the things you do about us liberals, and not get it dished back to you? Stow your crap about “hate,” you fuckers invented hate. We dish a little back, and you turn out to be a fucking crybaby. boo-hoo, cry me a river.

  109. 227

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:17 am

    Roger Rabbit don’t take no shit off wingfuck traitors! Roger Rabbit kicks ass!!!

  110. 228

    REP Pat Kennedy [D-Bitchslap the Black Security Guard At LAX] spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 1:02 am

    RR, Not a good night for you. Go to bed. Your “guvment” check will still come this week.

  111. 229

    Janet SS spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 7:34 am

    I have to apologize for something. Last night I criticized the people who participate on this blog for shouting down everyone who disagrees with them. I got up on my high horse and insisted that this was wrong – that people can disagree with reasoned argument and come out with everyone learning something new.

    That sounded pretty good. The problem is that I haven’t been walking my talk. You could probably list dozens of examples (and in an effort to clear the air I invite you to do so), but I will sheepishly present just one big whopper.

    I haven’t treated Darcy Burner fairly. I have repeatedly demanded that her supporters explain her merits, and when they did I pulled a Mark the Redneck routine of only hearing what I wanted to hear (which was quite close to nothing). I also refused to give an adequate answer to their entirely reasonable question: What has Reichert done that justifies re-election. Why did I deflect? Because he is no Abraham Lincoln.

    Truth be told, I find it very hard to be objective on this race. I’ve given money to Reichert, my husband is a lobbyist who requires a good working relationship, and almost all of my friends are Republican insiders. Our cocktail parties frankly have an echo chamber quality.

    That’s not the case at this blog. I give Goldy credit for not censoring people. You have lots more debate here than at Sound Politics.

    So my apologies. I will try to listen more carefully and not present my views with such shrillness. I will try to loosen up and have a better sense of humor. I’ll even do a better job of spelling my name right.

  112. 230

    Janet S spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 8:05 am

    Nice try at 111. But isn’t it chickenshit to fake who you are? If you disagree with me, have the guts to sign your name to it (even if it is an alias).

    Darcy Burner is in the spotlight now, on her own choosing. If she can’t be criticized, then she needs to get out now. Why does she need some lying ass like you defending her? Is her case so week? All I have asked is some meat to fill out a very thin resume. Can’t be done, because there isn’t any. She is a shallow dillantante, supported by wishful thinking in the dem party.

    This is a leftwing blog, so I talk about the left wing candidates. When this becomes a rightwing blog talking about REichert, then we can all talk about his qualifications. I’m sure goldy has some last minute smear he is working on, because even he knows that darcy is weak and can’t make it by playing it straight.

    You can speculate all day who I am and where I fit in the political picture. If spending that much time thinking about me makes you happy, then I have spread some sunshine into this world.

  113. 231

    Janet SS spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 8:30 am

    Oh, I’m so confused. My head and my heart are pulling in opposite directions! What do I do?

    I was raised to be a good girl. Do what you are told, be polite, wear lots of make up, and you will be rewarded. For years Libby Dole has been my role model, because she has been a great soldier – and has been rewarded in spades!

    I’ve tried to be like Libby. You can see that in how I’ve participated in this blog. I really want to carry the water for the Republicans this year because their majority status is imperiled. And that’s why I’ve gotten rather snippy and manipulative.

    But you know, I do feel sad. Because when I was in college a part of me did enjoy learning for the sake of learning; discussing big issues without getting angry at each other when we disagreed. For the first time I really understood what democracy was all about – the give and take of ideas; the sharing of who we are and where we stand. Oh, to walk away from those discussions feeling respected and respectful! I fondly remember those times.

    That’s not what it’s like out there in the political trenches today. It’s open warfare. I complain about your lefties, but I have seen enough Republican game plans to know that our strategy has been to polarize, polarize, polarize. Truth be told, that’s my main “job” here.

    I wish it weren’t so. Perhaps someday we can just be people and talk real.

  114. 232

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 8:51 am

    105

    “Like I said, there is much much more anger here directed towards your beloved countrymen who disagree with you than with the jihad murderers who would gleefully cut your throats. I don’t understand that. It is a mystery.” Commentby das— 6/26/06@ 12:12 am

    Well, duh. You need look no further than Newt Gingrich or Ann Coulter, for example. Your leaders have declared war on liberals. They call us “commies,” “traitors,” “unpatriotic,” etc. You stand up and cheer when Coulter says liberals should be put in “concentration camps” and “executed,” and liberal judges should be fed “rat poison.” And you wonder why we’re mad at you?

    Sheesh.

    Das, you are a gullible fucking fool. The kool-aid salesmen told you liberals are wimps, we’d just roll over, let you wipe your feet on us. Guess what, they lied. Your side fucked with us, so we’re fucking with you. Get used to it, because it’s not going away any time soon. War is hell. Our peace terms are unconditional surrender, and we reserve the right to execute your leaders.

  115. 233

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 8:54 am

    110

    I’m having a better night than you. YOU moved to a high taxes Democratic state, and you’re gonna spend the rest of your live squatting in your grass shack whining about what you did to yourself.

  116. 234

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 8:56 am

    112

    “All I have asked is some meat to fill out a very thin resume. Can’t be done, because there isn’t any.”

    Well Janet, I’m not “Janet SS,” but I think you’ve earned the parody you’re now getting by posting nonsensical pap like this.

  117. 235

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 9:00 am

    Tell me something, Janet Stupid, what “meat” was there on Dino Rossi’s resume? A year ago, you relentlessly shilled for a guy whose resume is a napkin. And you wonder why someone posting here thinks you’re a partisan whore, and is mocking you? You’re a lightweight, Janet — a bimbo, an airhead. You’re not even good at whoring.

  118. 236

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 9:02 am

    “You can speculate all day who I am and where I fit in the political picture.” Commentby Janet S— 6/26/06@ 8:05 am

    You flatter yourself. No speculation is necessary.

  119. 237

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 9:15 am

    What has Reichert done in Congress besides rubberstamping the extremist rightwing CHEAP LABOR agenda?

  120. 238

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 9:17 am

    Janet S is a piece of crinkled tinfoil whose only function is to reflects sound waves from the neocon noise machine. She’s not even a good fuck.

  121. 239

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 9:20 am

    You could back an 18-wheeler between her legs and she wouldn’t even know she’s being laid.

  122. 240

    Bunny spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 9:47 am

    Check out the Scotsman on Sunday (Scotland newspaper) for the scary article on 6 and 12-month waits for cancer treatment in UK. Single payer ain’t what you think it is. Don’t kid yourself.

  123. 241

    righton spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 10:45 am

    roger; you disappoint me

    all the wind energy infatuation; i’d love a ton of them; plant them on top of our hills

    of course, you libs fight them in Kennedy land, nimby thing you all are guilty of…

    how about 10 or so up on tiger mountain; maybe convert a few parks by the water to wind farms?

  124. 242

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 10:58 am

    “The increasing privatization of Australia’s health-care system has not meant a better bang for our buck,” said Dr. Jim Maher of the University of New England in New South Wales. “Instead, it has led to increasing complexity, higher costs and a two-tiered health system. The more we privatize, the deeper citizens have to dig into their own pockets.”

    “What is remarkable,” said Dr. Patrick Dubreil, “is that two countries that are continents apart are seeing the same negative outcomes of privatization. Increasingly in France we have a health-care system that financially punishes the sick, particularly those with limited income.”

    In 2002, 11.2 per cent of the French adult population reported they couldn’t get health care for financial reasons. French doctors are becoming big businessmen, Dr. Dubreil continued. Many now exact fat additional fees beyond a patient’s private insurance.

    In Australia, which also has an official two-tier system, the cost of private health insurance is climbing by up to 20 per cent per year. Yet, just as in France, many private hospitals and doctors still impose additional “substantial” fees,” Dr. Maher said.

  125. 243

    soundcrossing spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 11:00 am

    This probably won’t get read this late in the game for this post but I have one or two issues with the premise of the thread.

    Aren’t you completely ignoring all of the authors who say the same things about conservatives? Or Bush? I have read Democrate Underground. Kos. Huggington. Even some of the posts on your site and I don’t believe you have a leg to stand on regarding this issue.

    I have seen people call for assisinations, sabotage, etc. Watched your ilk line up at funerals and lambast grieving parents of servicemen killed in action.

    Watched you all pine for freedom of choice for abortions yet try to sue store owners for expressing their freedom of choice by not offering the “abortion pill”.

    This rant about Coulter is the old addage of the pot calling the kettle black. And if you can’t see the parallels you have truly blinded yourself to any type of fairness of thought.

  126. 244

    Tree Frog Farmer spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 11:39 am

    Stow it, Sound Crossin. “Tell it to the Marines!”

  127. 245

    Janet S spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 11:44 am

    Roger – you are nothing but a bitter old man. I feel sorry for you.

    At least Rossi was elected to office before running for governor. He had been proven in the public square. Darcy has nothing. We know nothing about her, because there is nothing to know. She can’t even handle the pressure of msft, so how will she do it in DC?

  128. 246

    soundcrossing spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 12:10 pm

    @ 126

    Pretty much what I would expect. Not any rebuttal, dialogue, etc. Just shut up.

    I like Coulter sometimes and don’t like her at other times. Haven’t read the book so can only comment on the BS I read in this thread. I did however see Bowling for Columbine and then did my due dilligance and researched what passed for “facts” in that work of fiction. Of course a great many of the items in that film were totally discredited, if not factually than for the errors in their context. Those errors completely obscuring the actual factual basis.

    I don’t see that in this thread about Coulter’s book or in general. I see alot of crying about her calling people names or “being mean” to them but not a lot of rebuttal. I see a lot of name calling but come on … tear the book apart item by item or else do the right thing and withhold your assinine comments.

  129. 247

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 1:31 pm

    125

    “Watched your ilk line up at funerals and lambast grieving parents of servicemen killed in action.” Commentby soundcrossing— 6/26/06@ 11:00 am

    Wrong-o, you lying fuck. The people you’re referring to are Right Wing Gay Haters. In other words, YOUR ilk.

  130. 248

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 1:33 pm

    122

    “Check out the Scotsman on Sunday (Scotland newspaper) for the scary article on 6 and 12-month waits for cancer treatment in UK. Single payer ain’t what you think it is. Don’t kid yourself.” Commentby Bunny— 6/26/06@ 9:47 am

    How long do you think an American with no health insurance has to wait? “Forever” comes to mind. So does the phrase “eternal rest.”

  131. 249

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 1:35 pm

    127

    The only thing Rossi accomplished during 6 years in the legislature was taking health care away from 46,000 kids.

    As a private citizen, he was a slimy real estate huckster who worked for a felon who literally stole from widows and orphans.

    It’s not hard to figure out what a Governor Rossi would be like. He’d give our state away to developers, and he’d be the most corrupt governor in state history.

  132. 250

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 1:36 pm

    127

    “Roger – you are nothing but a bitter old man.”

    Yeah, but at least I know that when somebody’s trying to drive an 18-wheeler up my ass, he’s trying to fuck me.

  133. 251

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 1:38 pm

    128

    Got two questions for you, wingfuck.

    1. Have you sent $99 to http://www.operation-helmet.org/ to buy a helmet upgrade kit for a soldier deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq?

    2. If not — why aren’t you supporting the troops?

    I did.

  134. 252

    soundcrossing spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 1:47 pm

    @129
    Sorry don’t support the “Gay Haters” as you say. I actually support the same and equal rights for homosexual people. I am one of those people who, even though I consider myself a Christian I believe in your right to chose your own path. I would never force it down somebodies throat or expect them to conform to my beliefs. One of the reasons I speak out against that “Pastor” who shows up places with the gay hating signs. Nice try at a re-direct though.

  135. 253

    das spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:01 pm

    Roger – this is just a hint from someone, a voice not in your head: just calling folks who disagree with you whores and fuckers is not exactly a victory for rationality, good argument or good manners; that you think so and celebrate yourself wildly indicates a definite strain of mental imbalance;

    Your claim to the right to execute our leaders confirms that mental scramble. Now you are in death threat territory, Roger? For FBI purposes do you want to get explicit about who those leaders are that you have a right to execute?

  136. 254

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:26 pm

    134

    You missed my point. You portrayed those people as liberals. They’re not — they’re rightwing freaks. Here — is this direct enough for you? — you’re a fucking liar.

  137. 255

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:28 pm

    135

    Gee D’Ass, you’ve noticed that I behave like REPUBLICANS?

  138. 256

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:29 pm

    D’Ass … question for ya, good buddy? Why should Republicans have a monopoly on irrationality and incivility? Isn’t there enough bad manners in this world for everyone to have some? What’s with you guys and your unwillingness to share? You creeps want a monopoly on every fucking thing.

  139. 257

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:31 pm

    D’Ass, tell you what. When rightwing turdfucks stop calling liberals “commies,” “traitors,” “unpatriotic,” etc., I’ll stop calling rightwing turdfucks by their right name and, um, figure out some way to fib about what they are.

  140. 258

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:33 pm

    D’Ass … how do you feel about Bush’s CUT AND RUN policy in Iraq? What do you think of giving AMNESTY to insurgents who killed Americans? When are you gonna figure out the GOP would sell YOU down the river in a heartbeat? They respect nothing, and they respect nobody. Least of all a shmuck nobody like you.

  141. 259

    soundcrossing spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:35 pm

    @136
    Another intelligent reply from the silly rabbit. You go girl ‘er rabbit.

  142. 260

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:37 pm

    It’s hilarious when wingfucks lecture us about civility.

  143. 261

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:38 pm

    boo hoo hoo
    boo hoo hoo
    boo hoo hoo

    For picture of wingfuck crying over spilled civility, click here:

    http://www.thediabetesblog.com.....crying.jpg

  144. 262

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:45 pm

    141

    Let’s recap. “soundcrossing” posted @125: “Watched your ilk line up at funerals and lambast grieving parents of servicemen killed in action.”

    I called BULLSHIT on this LIE. The entire country knows these protests are the handiwork of Rev. Fred Phelps and his cult of inbred morons (most of whom are related to him by bigamy or incestuous fornication), who are RIGHT WING NUTS.

    So, I accurately call “soundcrossing” a fucking liar, which is exactly what he is, and now “soundcrossing” responds with blubbering, crying, and whining.

    boo hoo hoo
    boo hoo hoo

    fucking crybaby

  145. 263

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:47 pm

    Hey soundcrossing, how do you feel about those RIGHTWING ASSHOLES who harass the families of soldiers killed in Iraq at their funerals? Wanna KILL ’em? Go right ahead — you have my permission. Twenty less RIGHTWING MUTANTS in this country will be a good thing for everyone.

  146. 264

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:49 pm

    Oh, and before I forget, “soundcrossing” is a fucking liar, and a fucking crybaby too. He’s also a wimp who gets pushed around by an 11 1/8th-lb. rabbit.

  147. 265

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:49 pm

    Now watch “soundcrossing” blubber and splutter and bawl some more, just because I painted his true colors on him.

  148. 266

    soundcrossing spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 2:53 pm

    @146 and wherever

    And yet again. The “gay haters” don’t support and not sure where you got that. Was pretty clear about it too, but then you aren’t one to see that. Phelps is a complete idiot, I’ve done my research. His little clan that shows up with those signs are his family. That is his “Church”. Most of you won’t know that because your fucking media calls it a “Church” instead of “some whacko and his whacko family.” So there you have it. Way to smoke that MSM rope wabbit. Still want to hear about your explanation about the dickheads that want to protest/celebrate at our soldiers funerals.

  149. 267

    soundcrossing spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 3:00 pm

    And once again ,,, nice re-direct. That’s a good lib tactic. Don’t answer a question just go on the attack in a different direction. Change the focus. Spew a boatload of irrelevancies and instead of waiting for a response or a rebuttal move onto something different and attack again.

    The thing is most of us Christians abhore Phelps and what he stands for. You’d never hear that though either. That wouldn’t be portraying the meidia’s stereotype of Christians. Or yours for that matter.

    Tote that line wabbit. Tote it hard and tote it proud. Show us you know how to regurgitate democratunderground talking points. I’m thinking that ol’ wabbit is actually a bigot. Look up the definition.

  150. 268

    das spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 3:09 pm

    interesting tht Roger thinks we shocked by his profanity when in reality we are shocked by his belief that his profanity is somehow effective…

    It is hard to imagine the smallness of the warren rabbit dwells in…where fetor rules…

  151. 269

    soundcrossing spews:

    Monday, 6/26/06 at 9:00 pm

    Read and re-read the posts. Wabbit you are just plain missing. It’s obvious you aren’t paying one iota of attention. You are picking one point that you’ve heard some sort of rebuttal for either in these threads or one of the less reputable sites or Air Amerika and spewing that. Took me a while to figure out your game. Shame on me.

“The David Goldstein Show” tonight, on 710-KIRO…

by Goldy — Sunday, 6/18/06, 10:36 am

At least for now we’re calling it “The David Goldstein Show”, every Sunday night from 7PM to 10PM on Newsradio 710-KIRO. But despite it’s rather bland name tonight’s show is jam-packed with interesting guests.

7PM: King County Council President Larry Phillips is going to join me at the top of the hour for an update on the future of vote-by-mail in the wake of Dean Logan’s departure. Then King County Executive Ron Sims will join me for the rest of the hour to take questions from callers.

8PM: 8th Congressional District Democratic challenger Darcy Burner will give us her take on President Bush’s trip to Seattle on behalf of his buddy, Rep. Dave Reichert. Then Seattle P-I columnist Joel Connelly will call in from a phone booth on Whidbey Island to discuss that and other issues of the day.

9PM: It’s “The Blogger Hour” with Podcasting Liberally regulars Will from Pike Place Politics and the Liberal Girl Next Door, Molly. Let’s see if they’re as entertaining and interesting sober as they are drunk.

Tune in or stream live and join the debate tonight from 7 to 10PM. Call me at 877-710-KIRO (5476) or leave a comment here, and I promise I’ll actually try to read the thread.

Share:

  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Print

Related

Comments

  1. 270

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:17 am

    Sounds like a good show, Goldy. Ask Phillips if the council is going to keep hemming and hawing until the elections department atrophies away.

  2. 271

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:45 am

    I’d like to hear from Sims if routes I ride are to get increased bus service under his proposal. Specifically will 56/57 and 174 be lines where service will become more frequent than two an hour? When making the connection between those routes now at S. 1st and S. Spokane, my wait time is most often twenty-five minutes.

  3. 272

    Josef in Marummy Country spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 12:56 pm

    Great show, Goldy!!!

    I’m looking forward to this one…

  4. 273

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 1:20 pm

    Harry – Your time is worth nothing. What difference does it make? If your time was worth anything, you’d be driving an SUV like everybody else.

  5. 274

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 1:22 pm

    Goldy — you should call it the “Take Back America Show.” ‘Cuz that’s what we’re gonna do.

  6. 275

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 1:23 pm

    4

    My time isn’t worth anything. I’m just waiting for humans to eat out their resource base and die off. Then I’m gonna rule the world!

  7. 276

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 1:25 pm

    The faster Mark the Redweenie burns gas, the sooner I’m gonna be King of the World! When the oil is gone, human civilization will collapse, and the human population will crash. When there’s no more gas for cars, no more bunnies will get run over, and the bunny population will explode! Then me and my 10 trillion billion children will run this place.

  8. 277

    REP Pat Kennedy [D-Bitchslap the Black Security Guard At LAX] spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 1:37 pm

    Let’s compare Goldystein’s ratings with, say………Rush’s. [hehe] JCH

  9. 278

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 2:06 pm

    Mark the Thieving Redneck @ 4

    “Harry – Your time is worth nothing. What difference does it make? If your time was worth anything, you’d be driving an SUV like everybody else.”

    Your opinion is worth nothing, Thief. If you had an ounce of integrity, you would make good on your bet, and pay Goldy the $100 you owe him.

    Until you do, don’t bother posting your tripe–you are worthless.

  10. 279

    LeftTurn spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 2:34 pm

    Goldy PLEASE every time you refer to Sheriff Davie, call him RUBBER STAMP REICHERT. We’d love for that to take hold!

    And I am out of town so I can’t call in tonight but maybe you should let Darcy know that the best the right has to offer against her is that a woman’s place is in the home!

  11. 280

    N in Seattle spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 3:07 pm

    David, what makes you think Will and Mollie will eschew demon rum just because they’ll be on FCC-regulated, 8-second delay, air?

    :-)

  12. 281

    Janet S spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 3:07 pm

    Leftturn – you are really tedious. But keep it up – if you actually come up with an original thought, no one will notice.

    Goldy – are you offering free air time to Reichert? Seems to me that you are actively campaigning for darcy, and working with her to coordinate her campaign. But, no one is really listening at the hours you are on, so I guess there is no issue of this being a campaign contribution.

  13. 282

    Progressive spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 3:09 pm

    Why don’t you ask Darcy Burner if she will vote to bring the troops home from the Middle East? I haven’t heard here say anything. And while she is at it, will she pledge to cut the war machine budget by 50% and put the money into education and social programs to actually help, oh I don’t know….Americans?

    And how can we expect that someone who has made their life’s work at a corrupt corporation to be the least bit progressive? Simple platitudes such as she is going to “stop Geoerge Bush” are no more than hot air if they are not backed with specifics. Bush will be president for 2 more years. There isn’t anything she can do to “stop him” other than pledging to filibuster all funding for the war machine and personally filibuster until the troops are brought home.

    So far all I have heard from her is wishy washy generalist weasel words that cover her butt so she won’t have to be held to a progressive agenda if she gets elected.

  14. 283

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 3:25 pm

    “Laptop With 13,000 D.C. Workers’ Data Stolen
    “AP

    “WASHINGTON (June 18) – A laptop containing the Social Security numbers and other personal data of 13,000 District of Columbia employees and retirees has been stolen, officials said.

    “The computer was stolen Monday from the Washington home of an employee of ING U.S. Financial Services, said officials with the company, which administers the district’s retirement plan.

    “The company did not notify city employees of the theft until late Friday because it took officials several days to determine what information was stored on the laptop, ING spokeswoman Caroline Campbell said.

    “The laptop was not password-protected and the data was not encrypted, Campbell said.”

    http://www.horsesass.org/my-co.....1&c=1

    Privacy advocates’ worst fears are coming true. But it turns out that, as our privacy is stripped away and our right to keep even the most sensitive and intimate details of our lives away from public view is ignored, the greatest threat to our well-being is not from a dictatorial government, but from an army of petty thieves.

    No matter how careful you are, your identity can be — and very likely will be — stolen. That’s because you are entirely at the mercy of careless strangers who don’t care about you.

    Historical experience tells us what will work to stop the pandemic of identity theft and the misery it brings. We need tough prosecution and sentencing of identity thieves, and we need tough enforcement of individual rights via the tort system. A company so careless than it allows employees to take this kind of data home on a laptop should cease to exist, and everyone involved should be stripped of everything he owns.

  15. 284

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 3:30 pm

    It will be a mistake for liberals to think that Bush’s low approval ratings mean the public is turning against imperialist warmongering. Their frustration with Bush is not that he is an imperialist warmonger, but that he is not more successful at it. Bush’s low numbers do not translate into support for peace or anti-war candidates. We can’t take 2008 or even 2006 for granted on the strength of these polls. All the war party needs to do is offer the bloodthirsty American public more competent warmongers.

  16. 285

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 3:57 pm

    Wabbit – I notice you’ve been throwing around the word “imperialist” lately. Do you know what that word means? Look it up. How are we imperialist? What country have we taken over and made part of Murka?

    Fucking idiot…

  17. 286

    Goldy spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 3:57 pm

    Janet… I have yet to invite Reichert on, but of course, I’d love to have him. In fact, I intend to challenge Reichert and Burner to a series of on-air monthly debates. My guess is that Burner will accept. What do you think the chance is that Reichert will?

  18. 287

    Dave Gibney spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 4:12 pm

    Hey, is ass one of the words you can’t say on radio? Does it matter if you refer to a horse, or a slimy opportunist like Timmy?

  19. 288

    ManofTruth spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 4:21 pm

    Roger Rabbit says :

    “…All the war party needs to do is offer the bloodthirsty American public more competent warmongers.”

    Sadlly so TRUE; see here

    Rubberstamp Reichert for Puppet (WA-08)

  20. 289

    LeftTurn spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 4:23 pm

    It’s YOU Janet S who are tedious. And an idiot. First you demand equal time for Rubber Stamp Reichert. Then you claim no one is listening. Do you even try to make sense? And moreover, does it HURT to be so stupid?

    In case any of you inbred righties don’t understand it, there is no equal time requirement. Your boy Ronnie Raygun saw to that.

    And as Goldy says, he’d love to have Rubber Stamp Riechert on the show but like that lying piece of shit Timmy, he’s probably to cowardly to attend.

  21. 290

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 4:53 pm

    Janet S @ 12

    “Leftturn – you are really tedious. But keep it up – if you actually come up with an original thought, no one will notice.”

    I must second the sentiment of LeftTurn @ 20.

    To the VAST majority of readers, Janet, you are the asswipe that is tedious. I mean…this is a liberal blog, so if you don’t like what LeftTurn has to say: GO THE FUCK AWAY, you fucking DOLT!

    It’s as simple as that. Wingnuts like you who keep coming back are a bunch of masochistic dipshits for (1) Reading Goldy’s blog, and (2) trying to “participate” in the comment thread community. The self-loathing must be intense for you to keep coming back.

  22. 291

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 5:01 pm

    Mark the Thieving Redneck

    “I notice you’ve been throwing around the word “imperialist” lately. Do you know what that word means? Look it up. How are we imperialist? What country have we taken over and made part of Murka?”

    Ummmm….Mark, like your pretend understanding of statistics (i.e. your “chi-squared” analysis that you wanted someone to inappropriately apply to climiatological time series), I doubt you understand what the word “imperialist” means yourself.

    You usually don’t know what the fuck you are talking about, or you rely on some wacked-out wingnut defintion to support your faux “arguments.”

    Really, you are an idiot and a thief. Go away thief-boy–you are unwelcomed.

  23. 292

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 5:09 pm

    Hey, I haven’t heard you moonbats talk about global warming lately. What up with that? That’s your relgion now. You need to say over and over that “the scientific debate is over” and that we need to fuck up our economy to “fix” global warming.

    Geez, do I hafta tell you guys everything?

  24. 293

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 5:15 pm

    Mark the Thieving Redneck @ 23

    “Geez, do I hafta tell you guys everything?”

    No…asshole…you don’t; we would all prefer that you keep your fucking trap shut, since you have not demonstrated that you have any real insight into the science or economics of global warming.

    I mean, why the fuck would we listen to you? You’re an idiot!

  25. 294

    Will spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 5:29 pm

    Don’t forget to tune in for the 9 o’clock hour, bitches.

  26. 295

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 5:35 pm

    Hey DJ – How things down in Oly today? How’s that research going at a “major research institution”? LMAO… No, Bong U is NOT a major anything…

    Shit…

  27. 296

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 5:36 pm

    DJ – Didja figure out what chi squared is yet? Tell me, are current temps within historical range or not? Just give me a yes or no. Fucking idiot…

  28. 297

    Goldy spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 5:41 pm

    And as Goldy says, he’d love to have Rubber Stamp Riechert on the show but like that lying piece of shit Timmy, he’s probably to cowardly to attend.

    Commentby LeftTurn— 6/18/06@ 4:23 pm

    Ahhhh. OK that enough LT. Let me zip up my pants already. Groupies. Geeez.

  29. 298

    Mark The Red Dick spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 6:01 pm

    Goldy, I may profoundly disagree with many of your views, but I just want to say that I respect your willingness to put yourself out there. That’s what democracy is all about!

    I would also like to thank dj for helping me to reconsider some of my views. I realize that I can get a little cocky sometimes, but I do think about what you say. In fact, I’ve started to question my ideas enough that I will be entering a master’s program in economics this fall.

    Finally, I appreciate Roger’s discussion last night about pig anuses. You may not have noticed it, but it was quite a relief on my part to finally come out of the closet on that issue.

    Darndest thing — you guys are starting to feel like family to me!

  30. 299

    K spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 6:02 pm

    OK, Mark, the amoral jerk, from Science Magazine let’s try this again on climate change:

    That hypothesis was tested by analyzing 928 abstracts, published in refereed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003, and listed in the ISI database with the keywords “climate change” (9).

    The 928 papers were divided into six categories: explicit endorsement of the consensus position, evaluation of impacts, mitigation proposals, methods, paleoclimate analysis, and rejection of the consensus position. Of all the papers, 75% fell into the first three categories, either explicitly or implicitly accepting the consensus view; 25% dealt with methods or paleoclimate, taking no position on current anthropogenic climate change. Remarkably, none of the papers disagreed with the consensus position.

    http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/...../5702/1686

    What’s your source? Surely not the 928 peer reviewed articles.

  31. 300

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 6:05 pm

    K – Just answer the fucking question. It really isn’t that hard. Are current temps within normal historical ranges? Yes or No?

    Geez…

  32. 301

    Mark The Red Dick spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 6:07 pm

    K, hold your fire. I went to see Gore’s movie last night, and I will admit that he makes some good points. I may be pretty smart, but I’m no so well trained in the hard sciences that I can categorically reject the findings of 928 peer-reviewed papers.

    Where I come from we like to say that where there is smoke, there may very well be fire. The question is how much? I’m still thinking about that. Please be patient. This is new territory for me.

  33. 302

    K spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 6:09 pm

    You answer my fucking question, what is your source for disputing climate change?

  34. 303

    Mark The Red Dick spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 6:13 pm

    One of the most powerful moments in Gore’s movie was when he showed a graph displaying data that displayed the temperature and CO2 variations in Antartic ice over a 600,000 year period. The current temperatures, like the CO2 counts, are no longer within historical ranges. This is frankly alarming — and goes a long way toward explaining why major ice shelves have collapsed much faster than predicted. So I would concede that something is going on here.

  35. 304

    Chuck L. Head spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 6:33 pm

    Could we bag the political discourse/radio promo here for just a moment and wish a Happy Father’s Day to Mr. Goldstein?… Misguided tho’ he may be, I do believe he cares… That’s important.

    Chuck

  36. 305

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:14 pm

    Goldy….

    Could you ask the councilman phillips if the fact that KC elections is running at only 70% staff will affect the effectiveness of implementing this NEW SYSTEM?

    Thanks
    Chris

  37. 306

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:18 pm

    Mark the Thieving Redneck @ 26

    “How things down in Oly today? How’s that research going at a “major research institution”? LMAO… No, Bong U is NOT a major anything…”

    Sorry, Thief, once again, you have it completely wrong. I’ve spent less than a week in Olympia for my entire life.

    Stupid fuck!

  38. 307

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:20 pm

    Mark the Thieving Redneck @ 26

    “DJ – Didja figure out what chi squared is yet? Tell me, are current temps within historical range or not? Just give me a yes or no.”

    Sorry, Redneck, a Chi-square “analysis” is an inappropriate technique for this type of test. You are a fool.

    On second thought…you are you a fucking moron.

  39. 308

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:29 pm

    Yikes! Goldy – have Ron call back on another line.

  40. 309

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:30 pm

    Goldy

    Please ask Ron if he votes at the Polls or Absentee?

  41. 310

    Mark The Redneck Kennedy spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:31 pm

    So if you’re not at Bong U, which “major research institute” are you with? Can you even name one?

  42. 311

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:33 pm

    Also ask Ron if no NEW personell or equipment will be needed. That it will be less cumbersome.. He seems to be implying/making that point.

    I would like to hear his response.

    Thankyou
    Chris

  43. 312

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:37 pm

    43.

    I’ll name two (among many):

    Woods Hole Research Center

    U.S. Global Change Research Information Office

  44. 313

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:46 pm

    Ron Simms sounds totally muffled! Dana from Carnation came through perfectly clear. This is bad..

  45. 314

    Progressive spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:47 pm

    Roger Rabbit,

    Why would it be a mistake to think the low poll numbers mean they are tired of this imperialistic war of aggression? Not that I am poll drive. Hell, if I were the last person on earth to think this is wrong, I could give a flying fuck. But what evidence do you have that is not the case?

    And do we want to be associated with war mongers? Because those who voted for Democrats who voted for the war are just that – war mongers.

    This thing has been going on for far too long. Enough is enough. No party loyalty should keep us from standing up and doing what ie right. Marching and protesting is one thing, but now we need action. This is the fourth quarter and the insanity has gone on long enough.

    Is everyone going to put a politcal party loyalty ahead of their progressive beliefs? We need to make sure Darcy Burner is committed to bringing the troops home. She can make a difference if she makes it specifically her campaign platform to filibuster any and every bill until the troops are brought home. Will she do it? Is she a true progressive? Does she even care about her fellow human being blown apart in Iraq?

  46. 315

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:53 pm

    Sharkansky’s arguments are totally bogus. What a fraud!

    Polling places feeeeel good. Your neighbours SEE you! Just empty propaganda.

    Vote by mail systems are as transparent and verifiable as concerned citizens want them to be.

  47. 316

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:56 pm

    Josef!!! The Mary Lane fiend. Cut him off!

  48. 317

    Mark The Red Dick spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 7:58 pm

    Harry @ 45:
    I must concede that both of those research outfits are highly credible when it comes to global warming research. I apologize for referring to the as Bong U.; they are anything but.

  49. 318

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:00 pm

    Clueless @ 48

    Why does Goldy advocate and says he likes poll voting….. Do you think Goldy is Bogus/fraud/full of propaganda too?

  50. 319

    K spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:02 pm

    Hey Mark, if you can’t respond about peer review, you wouldn’t know a research institute if you bumped into one.

  51. 320

    LeftTurn spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:09 pm

    Funny I was checking around and couldn’t find a “Steffy” radio show. I guess USP isn’t as popular as HA! HE HE!

  52. 321

    LeftTurn spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:09 pm

    Funny I was checking around and couldn’t find a “Steffy” radio show. I guess USP isn’t as popular as HA! HE HE!

  53. 322

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:12 pm

    Goldy,

    Can you ask Darcy, WHAT SHE IS GONNA DO FOR THE 8th? I dont need to hear about what Reichart is NOT GONNA DO…

  54. 323

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:13 pm

    Chris the Stefan fan @ 51

    I like polling place voting too. I’ve never voted by mail myself. But like Goldy I’m pragmatic and realize that vote by mail is very popular and if instituted would save the county money just like it has in other places.

    If citizens are concerned and involved there is no threat from monkey business even if Republicans are running things.

    Sharansky is a fear monger and a demagogue and his arguments are emotion-driven and bogus.

  55. 324

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:15 pm

    55

    Why don’t you call in to the show and ask her yourself? Do you need your mother to wipe your ass, too?

  56. 325

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:17 pm

    55 – Darcy Burner is NOT going to be a rubber stamp for George Bush and the corrupt DeLay/Hastert machine.

  57. 326

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:18 pm

    What…did I hear that correctly. Was fucking Josef from Marummy County suggesting to Ron Sims that Mary Lane be hired to replace Dean Logan?????

    Waahhhhhhh, haaaa, haaaaaa, haaaa, haaaaa. Woooooh, hooooo, hoooo, hoooo.

    That is damn funny! …if only because it verbally confirms what us long-time HA readers have known for some time:

    Josef is fucking insane!

  58. 327

    LeftTurn spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:21 pm

    No need to ask Darcy what she’ll do for the 8th Goldy. We already know. She’ll make sure that it’s no longer a rubber stamp for Bush regime policy. That’s good enough for me. Besides, no matter what she says, the inbred righties will attack her.

  59. 328

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:25 pm

    29

    “Finally, I appreciate Roger’s discussion last night about pig anuses.” Commentby Mark The Red Dick— 6/18/06@ 6:01 pm

    I would sure hate to think anyone missed it — so here it is again!!!

    “When Ann Coulter had her sex-change operation, they made her cunt from a pig’s anus, and you can get sex just as good at a hog farm.” Commentby Roger Rabbit— 6/18/06@ 12:20 am

  60. 329

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:32 pm

    Stefan sure has a greasy voice. He sounds like a bicycle wheel with too much WD-40 on it. No wonder he doesn’t have a show on KIRO!

    Anyway, Stefan thinks poll voting is better than mail voting, but I don’t agree. Poll voting has its own problems, such as pollworkers walking off the job instead of following their supervisor’s instructions. I’ve worked as a pollworker twice now, and both times my polling place had problems with the machine the voters stick their ballots in.

    But the real problem with our elections is the BAD FAITH of people who impugn the election process, slander elections administrators, and demand revotes if their candidate loses. Generally, these are the same people (or, at least, people of the same ideological persuasion) who try to win elections by keeping American citizens from voting in their own country, especially if they’re minorities.

    Stefan talked about “trust.” Of course people won’t trust the elections process if partisan propagandists tell them the other side cheated when their candidate loses. My message to you, Stefan, is that if we’re ever gonna restore “trust” in elections, the first thing people have to do is stop lying about our elections. Get the hint?

  61. 330

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:32 pm

    Mark the Thieving Redneck,

    “So if you’re not at Bong U, which “major research institute” are you with?”

    Sorry…I’m not saying any more than I did here, although it would not be at all difficult to deduce my employer using only information I’ve posted on HA.

    “Can you even name one?”

    What the fuck kind of idiotic question is that? Of course I can. Many people without any college experience can name a few….

  62. 331

    LeftTurn spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:35 pm

    Isn’t Steffy the regional director of the Log Cabin republicans?

  63. 332

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:39 pm

    Clueless @ 56

    Since you are convinced, and so is RON and Phillips, that the KC Elections dept can implement a NEW SYSTEM, with NO TOP MANAGEMENT in place, then go for it.

    But when every caller (taxpayer/voter) goldy had tonight with the exception of Sims and Phillips, said they didnt like the idea, and EVERY person that Testified in front of the Council 2 weeks ago, said they DIDNT WANT VBM, when do the people/taxpayers/voters get a say in this……

    You think the republicans are watching/fearmongering/bitching now, just wait till the council shoves this down their throats.

    Ron Simms and Phillips too, obviously think they know BEST. They are both elected officals, but of course they control the Elections…..Ironic isnt it. But this shouldn’t be a partisan issue. It should be the public’s choice…..

    I wrote each council person and executive simms regarding the lack of staff to implement this change right now. I hope they will listen to the People and Not the Party….

  64. 333

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:41 pm

    While we’re discussing elections, I think it’s disgusting that GOP operatives challenged the votes of soldiers deployed to Iraq because they didn’t answer letters the GOP sent to their stateside homes, simply because they lived in heavily Democratic minority precincts.

    I’m not making this up. It was reported by the BBC. http://www.gregpalast.com/mass.....o-soldiers

    The GOP got caught because one of their people got sloppy and sent e-mails with incriminating attachments to a non-party address. The attachments included “caging lists,” i.e., lists of voters targeted for disenfranchisement.

    If people like Stefan Sharkansky really cared about election reform and voting fraud, he would pick up this story on his blog and demand the GOP stop using such tactics. His dead silence on any cheating, gaming, or misconduct committed by the GOP exposes him as a partisan fraud. Stefan doesn’t really care about honest elections. He only cares about tarring any election the GOP doesn’t win.

  65. 334

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:43 pm

    Why isn’t the “liberal media” picking up the BBC story? If the U.S. media was really “liberal” as wingfucks assert, they would be plastering this story all over the front page. Considering how “liberal” they supposedly are, the U.S. media sure buries a lot of stories embarrassing to the GOP and Bush administration. The truth is, U.S. media is overwhelmingly pro-Republican.

  66. 335

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:43 pm

    Roger

    I dont want to get into a pissing match with you, but do you think KC elections can do this without full staff?

  67. 336

    K spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:45 pm

    Chris- Sims and the Council have already determined the change must be elayed. The question is how long.

  68. 337

    K spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:47 pm

    delayed

  69. 338

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:49 pm

    Chris @ 65

    “Since you are convinced, and so is RON and Phillips, that the KC Elections dept can implement a NEW SYSTEM, with NO TOP MANAGEMENT in place, then go for it.”

    Ummm…try to keep up here, Chris. It is not a new system. Right now eighty-some percent of KC already votes absentee. The system IS in place.

    “But when every caller (taxpayer/voter) goldy had tonight with the exception of Sims and Phillips, said they didnt like the idea, and EVERY person that Testified in front of the Council 2 weeks ago, said they DIDNT WANT VBM, when do the people/taxpayers/voters get a say in this……”

    Take a pill, dude, you are becoming apoplectic. Did I mention that eighty-some percent of KC voters vote by mail? Big fucking deal if a small vocal minority of people object. They can drop their ballots off at a regional center.

    “You think the republicans are watching/fearmongering/bitching now, just wait till the council shoves this down their throats.”

    Well, they can start by canciling their permanent absentee status. That would be a good, and productive, statement for theme to make.

    “Ron Simms and Phillips too, obviously think they know BEST.”

    No…but they can fucking read the numbers!

    “They are both elected officals, but of course they control the Elections…..Ironic isnt it. But this shouldn’t be a partisan issue. It should be the public’s choice…..”

    Oh, brother. Let me guess, you are another Rossi SORE LOSER, who has been brainwashied into believing that there was election fraud in 04. Get some help, asshole.

    “I wrote each council person and executive simms regarding the lack of staff to implement this change right now. I hope they will listen to the People and Not the Party….”

    I agree…but in this case, the market has spoken!

  70. 339

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:50 pm

    K @ 69

    By listening to both simss and phillips tonight on goldys show, they both implied they are VOTING tommorrow on it. Maybe Goldy can shed some light on this, or another listener.

  71. 340

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:51 pm

    65

    Are you a pollworker, Chris? Are you willing to get up a 5 AM, show up at a polling place at 7 AM, and work until 9 PM, for $9 an hour? King County, like most voting jurisdictions in America, doesn’t have enough pollworkers. Some King County polling places, including the one I work at, don’t have any Republican pollworkers so they have to use people calling themselves “independents.” I wonder if the reverse isn’t true in some eastside polling places.

    Poll voting is not inherently better or more secure than absentee voting. At least absentee ballots are handled by professional staff. Pollworkers receive minimal training and work only a couple days a year. Although most are honest and try to do a good job, their competence level is not very high.

    Anyone who paid attention to the poll voting problems in Florida and Ohio understands that the real reason Republicans like you oppose mail voting is because it’s a lot easier to fuck with voters at polls. You can’t make mail voters wait hours in the rain to vote by locking voting machines in warehouses. You can’t station party operatives at polling places to challenge minority votes when people are voting by mail.

  72. 341

    K spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:53 pm

    I’ll admit I’m not listening- (Miami down by 2 in the 4th)but the fact they vote tomorrow was determined by the fact that the legislation was intorduced before Logan’s resignation. This is the statement posted by Sims on his site:

    “As for the vote-by-mail transition proposal currently before Council, my staff and I will evaluate over the next few weeks how Dean’s decision to move on will affect the plan. With Dean’s departure, it may not be possible to implement the plan by the 2007 primary as originally envisioned,” Sims said.

  73. 342

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:55 pm

    Roger……

    That wasnt the question….I do appreciate your response.

    Can KC Elections operate at 70% with NO Top Managment?

  74. 343

    LeftTurn spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:56 pm

    No matter what KC does, the righties will attack and complain. That is their strategy. They have no hope so all they can do is make allegations and try to thwart the will of the people. And we should NOT allow it. We should NOT debate or discuss this. We should do what’s fair and fuck em if they don’t like it. Remember this, if the righties were in charge, they wouldn’t care one bit about fairness. They care ONLY about winning. God help us all if that ever happens here.

  75. 344

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:56 pm

    We should get rid of all voting machines and go back to hand-counted paper ballots. The voter marks an “X” in a box on a piece of paper, and election workers from both parties count every ballot. This system is as foolproof as it’s possible to get. Is it labor intensive? Yes, but there’s plenty of senior citizens and other folks who need the paycheck. Is it expensive? Probably not as expensive as the voting machines nobody trusts. We don’t need to know by 8:15 PM on election night who won. It’s the media that pushes for that. The goal should not be to make the media happy, but to enable the public to feel confident of getting an honest election result.

  76. 345

    K spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:57 pm

    Chris- read what I posted. THe resignation was unexpected. They are evaluating how to proceed.

  77. 346

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 8:58 pm

    75

    That IS the question, Chris. KC elections obviously can’t operate without management, but they can’t conduct poll voting without pollworkers, either. If you’re not willing to work at a polling place, then you can’t reasonably take poll voting for granted.

  78. 347

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:01 pm

    Leading up to the 2004 election, I read in the media that the U.S. as a whole had a shortfall of 500,000 pollworkers — that’s an average of 10,000 per state. Many of the senior citizens who did this work in the past, and have died or are now too old to do it anymore, can’t be replaced because the generations behind them are not willing to do this work. We are losing the generation that considered poll work a citizen duty, and the younger generations have different attitudes and values.

  79. 348

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:06 pm

    Roger…..Thanks for your response. I appreciate your candor and honesty.

    K…. I am not arguing, just posting what I thought I heard, the vote will be tommorrow.

    DJ….Fuck off. You don’t want to listen, you just want to spout off….I am not listening.

  80. 349

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:07 pm

    I worked at a polling place with several precincts, and we had one “inspector” and 6 “judges.” That’s 7 pollworkers who were each paid $9 an hour for 12 hours, or nearly $800. Only about 250 or so people came to the poll, and some of these just dropped off absentee ballots. So it costs King County taxpayers about $4 per voter to keep that polling place open. It serves around 30% of the people who vote, the rest vote by absentee.

    We never hear the end of Republican bitching about taxes and paying for government services. If you guys want to spend $4 for every ballot cast in a polling place, then pay some fucking taxes for it.

    Or maybe you think pollworkers should work for free?

  81. 350

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:11 pm

    Chris @ 81,

    “DJ….Fuck off. You don’t want to listen, you just want to spout off….I am not listening.”

    Sorry, Dolt, but you are so fucking apoplectic that you are making no sense whatsoever. Take a little time to learn about the fucking issues before wasting our time ’round here.

  82. 351

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:12 pm

    Roger….

    I am not saying that going VBM is a BAD THING. I just think it is best to put it off until the Elections Dept is at 100%. The system in place is common to all the people in elections now.

    All I am saying is, Put it off for now. Make the Elections Dept a Solid department (say 12months from now) and then make the change. If we do it now, all hell will break loose.

    Why not have a secret ballot of all the person’s working in the Elections dept now, Ask them if they could handle this change with the lack of management.

  83. 352

    LeftTurn spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:16 pm

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12.....ek/page/2/

    Looks like Baby Bush got caught trying to re-write history.

  84. 353

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:18 pm

    DJ @ 83

    Did I strike a nerve??? Are you twitching???

  85. 354

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:19 pm

    Goldy — note to your guests — it was Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio) who called Rep. John Murtha a “cut and run” Democrat.

    Schmidt is a flake. Even in her own heavily Republican district, she is controversial, and she barely beat Democrat Paul Hackett, an Iraq war veteran, in a special election.

    Schmidt, a real estate multimillionaire, defeated her 2006 primary challenger by less than 4,000 votes after running a dirty campaign against him. In addition, several people and organizations whose names she used as endorsements repudiated her endorsement claims, and the Ohio Elections Commission unanimously voted to reprimand her for falsely claiming to have a degree from the University of Cincinatti.

  86. 355

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:21 pm

    84

    “I am not saying that going VBM is a BAD THING. I just think it is best to put it off until the Elections Dept is at 100%.”

    Isn’t that what Sims did? I heard in the news last week that VBM has been delayed until 2008 because of Logan’s departure.

  87. 356

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:22 pm

    Jean Schmidt is one of those people who use their own money to buy a political office.

  88. 357

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:27 pm

    Roger….

    Both Phillips and Sims said tonight that it is being voted on tommorrow. Maybe Goldy can shed some light on this subject when he is done with his radio broadcast…

    Any other listener’s hear ????

  89. 358

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:27 pm

    Chris @ 86

    “Did I strike a nerve??? Are you twitching???”

    No, not at all. And, NoO oOO oOOOo, why do you ask?

  90. 359

    Seattle Man spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:28 pm

    Goldstein,
    Your show is too much “inside politics” and too partisan to interest me on an ongoing basis. And I’m a Democrat.

  91. 360

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:30 pm

    Chris – I’ve seen your cheerleading for Stefan “Minnow” Sharansky at (un)SP.

  92. 361

    twilight zone spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:34 pm

    The truth is, almost all the fraud (dead voters, double voters–of which there are more than you think, based on research, the felon who voted straight from prison, illegal Fatal pends that got counted but shouldn’t have, according to Huennekens) that happened was in the mail ballots. KCE has not a good enough system of checks and balances yet for that. You can register out of a Mailpost store claim residence in a small box, and KCE will take it. Too much opportunity for fraud. We have the right NOT to be disenfranchised by illegal votes. Sigs are tough to match and Dow Constantine even commented they change daily. KCE has not provided requested info as needed.
    Clean up your act, KCE, before you create even more messes.

  93. 362

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:42 pm

    http://www.metrokc.gov/mkcc/ThisWeek.htm

    Its on the Agenda.

    Mr Clueless @ 93

    So you are saying that my opinion doesn’t count HERE because I visit the “Other Blog”…. Men and their Ego’s….Jeezzzz.. Don’t let the “Competition” get the best of you……

    Roger…. I appreciate all your honesty, and it has been a pleasure “blogging” with you….Even with all your rants, you are a very enlightening, up to date, and an informative Rabbit. I appreciate you being human with me….Even if you are a Rabbit ;).

  94. 363

    howcanyoubePROUDtobeanASS spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:43 pm

    We should get rid of all voting machines and go back to hand-counted paper ballots. The voter marks an “X” in a box on a piece of paper, and election workers from both parties count every ballot. This system is as foolproof as it’s possible to get. Is it labor intensive? Yes, but there’s plenty of senior citizens and other folks who need the paycheck. Is it expensive? Probably not as expensive as the voting machines nobody trusts. We don’t need to know by 8:15 PM on election night who won. It’s the media that pushes for that. The goal should not be to make the media happy, but to enable the public to feel confident of getting an honest election result. -Commentby Roger Rabbit— 6/18/06@ 8:56 pm

    well damn rabbit…we agree! Another conservative hug for that pesky rabbit!

  95. 364

    Seattle Man spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:46 pm

    Goldstein,
    The other comment I’d like to make about your show is that it is obvious that you really don”t know very much about local issues.
    You know about political races but you don’t seem very familiar with the region and its issues.
    Or at least it doesn’t come across so far.
    Personally, as a Democrat, I am not interested in further partisan Democratic interests. The local Party just doesn’t have enough smarts to make me care about making sure Democrats are re-elected if they are so overtly and foolishly partisan — “My Party right or wrong!” – as you seem to be.

  96. 365

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:53 pm

    Seattle Man @ 97

    “The other comment I’d like to make about your show is that it is obvious that you really don’’t know very much about local issues.”

    What the fuck? If you want to discuss a non-election local issue, call the fucking show, don’t bitch about it here. I mean, Goldy scheduled discussion of the 8th CD race and KC elections issues, but the third hour is open to the whim of callers!

    Call in and find out for yourself if Goldy understands local issues.

    p.s. whatever you do, don’t ask about the school closure issue!!!!!

  97. 366

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:55 pm

    A caller named “Jim” is asking Goldy how Gregoire won the final recount. The answer is that the counting machines did not count all the ballots. If you look at the actual recount numbers, all candidates gained additional votes with each successive recount, because ballots the machines couldn’t read were counted the second and third times around. There was virtually no shifting of votes from one candidate’s column to another candidate’s column.

    In King County, the ballots are counted by Diebold Opti-Scan machines/ These machines can’t read ballots if the “timing marks” along the edges are frayed, if there are stray marks on the ballot, or if the oval is not completely filled in.

    Washington law says ballots are to be counted according to the voter’s intent. In many cases where the scanning machines can’t read ballots, who the voter voted for is obvious on visual inspection. These ballots usually are not controversial and the party observers typically agree on which candidate the voter was for. However, in cases of ambiguous marks or where there is disagreement, the ballot goes to the canvassing board for a decision.

    Gregoire won the election without canvassing board ballots. At the end of the hand recount, she was ahead of Rossi by 8 votes. By then, King County was the only canvassing board that had not reported. This is because King County has far more ballots than any other county. The KC canvassing board’s disposition of disputed ballots resulted in additional votes for all three gubernatorial candidates, but Gregoire made a net gain of another 121 votes. Finally, Judge Bridges’ decision in the election contest lawsuit subtracted 4 fraudulent votes from Rossi’s total.

  98. 367

    Seattle Man spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:58 pm

    dj,
    I’ll do any damn thing I want.
    I am writing it here as constructive criticism which he can read later….don’t like it, too bad, fella.

  99. 368

    For the Clueless spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 9:58 pm

    95 – Chris, I visit the other blog too.

    That’s where I saw your cheerleading for Sharansky.

    You not only “visit” the other blog – it’s clear to me you that you are sympathetic to the ugly demagogic style over there.

  100. 369

    Chris spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:02 pm

    Clueless @ 101

    Is it a CRIME to visit????? Are you sympathetic to old ladies who need help crossing the crosswalk???

    I am not parading any agenda here, just my opinion about KC Elections being poorly staffed…..

    I havent been a cheerleader since 7th grade by the way, I CAN THINK for myself, thank you very much…..

    This Petty Blog Bashing takes away from good discussion…..

  101. 370

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:05 pm

    Goldy’s final caller. Beverly, is talking about abortion. She’s apparently a right-to-life Democrat. I don’t know if you read HorsesAss, Beverly, but I want you to know that I agree with your argument that abortion is contrary to core a Democratic value, compassion for the weak and defenseless (and who is weaker and more defenseless than an unborn child). Also, although I am not Catholic, and have some problems with some of the Church’s positions on procreation (for example, opposing birth control exacerbates population problems), I certainly understand that many Catholics are traditionally Democrats and are repulsed by the Democratic Party’s support of abortion rights.

    But I think Goldy made a valid point, too — that Democrats generally are not one-issue voters. I understand the strong feelings about the abortion issue, but refusing to vote only helps elect Republicans, and you have to balance the Democrats’ unsatisfactory (to you) position on abortion against the unsatisfactory policies that will result from Republicans winning elections.

  102. 371

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:10 pm

    One must not forget that Republicans’ support of war, killing and torturing civilians in other countries, and their opposition to family planning overseas that reduces population and starvation, and their opposition to things here at home like aid for the poor, public education, public health, and so on, goes far to offset any moral advantage the GOP might claim by reason of their pro-life stance on the abortion issue. Sadly, charges that Republicans only care about children until they’re born has way too much truth to it.

  103. 372

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:20 pm

    97, 100

    Seattle Man —

    First of all, the differences between Republicans and Democrats today are so stark that I don’t see how anyone who can honestly call himself a “Democrat” could vote Republican or fail to support Democratic candidates, which is nearly the same thing. The Democratic Party is a big tent and there’s always something under it to disagree with. The solution is to get active in the party and work for the issues you care about.

    Second, Goldy is a relatively recent transplant to Washington, so of course he doesn’t know all the local issues, or understand all of the nuances. Hell, the vast majority of native-born Washingtonians don’t know very much about the issues confronting this state. Water is a big one, but how many people around here know anything about water? Our growth and transportation issues are very complicated. How many people know we have a looming higher education crisis — i.e., not enough room in our public colleges for qualified and deserving students? How many Washington voters have ever read the Gates Commission Report, or comprehend that our state tax system is profoundly flawed? How many people do you personally know who can tell you that in Washington, 41% of state and local taxes are paid by small businesses, compared to an average of 30% in other western states? How many voters know that the poorest fifth of Washington households pay four times the percentage of their income to state and local taxes as the richest fifth (17% vs. 4%)? It takes years to learn all the ins and outs of the issues facing our state’s citizens. Goldy has done a good job in the time he’s been here, and he will grow more knowledgeable as time goes on.

  104. 373

    Harry Tuttle aka voter advocate spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:23 pm

    82.

    I worked a polling place in Burien, and we were short two workers during the March election, so we had only five people to accept 110 ballots.

    Five workers make $118.00 to handle 110 ballots, that 5.36 per ballot for labor.

    A mailed in ballot costs about $0.20 in labor to be readied for tabulation.

    The overhead costs are different, but not nearly enough different to make up for the $5.00 disparity in the initial handling.

    Republicans sure like to spend the county money.

  105. 374

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:31 pm

    95

    You’re welcome. I long for the day when people of all persuasions can again have honest differences of opinion and talk about issues instead of each other’s patriotism (or alleged lack thereof). This will be a better country when the Ann Coulters and Karl Roves slink into oblivion, and Republicans and Democrats are again cutting deals in smoke-filled rooms.

  106. 375

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:33 pm

    But until then, it’s not my fault that Republicans are unpatriotic America-hating fascists! I gotta play the hand I’m dealt.

  107. 376

    Harry Tuttle spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:44 pm

    A big hole in the argument that poll voting is safer than vote-by-mail is the fact that election inspectors receive the voting machines on the Sunday before election day.

    Anyone who doesn’t see the potential for mischief in a single person having exclusive control of a programmable device for more than twenty-four hours isn’t thinking very clearly.

  108. 377

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:46 pm

    NEWSWEEK: INFLATION THREAT GROWING

    For months, I’ve been attacking Bush’s economic policies (especially deficit spending) as inflationary. This week, Newsweek economics columnist Robert J. Samuelson writes,

    “We have an inflation problem that we need to cure before it gets worse. … Inflation … is clearly rising. … In the past three months, the increase in the CPI on an annualized basis (projected for a year) is 5.7 percent.”

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13...../newsweek/

  109. 378

    ENOUGH ALREADY spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:50 pm

    CHRIST GOLDY THOSE WERE GREAT QUESTIONS YOU ALLOWED DARCY TO ANSWER.YOUR A FUCKIN HACK.YOU MAY LAST TO THE END OF THE MONTH.DID YOUR BUDDY SIMMS BLOW YOU AFTER THE SHOW.AND WHO THE FUCK WERE THE TWO LAST WACK JOBS YOU HAD ON.THATA ALL FOR YOU BACK TO DRUDE AT LEAST HE CAN RUN A RADIO SHOW SOMETHING YOU ARE UNABLE TO DO.

  110. 379

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 10:57 pm

    Chris @ 102

    “I am not parading any agenda here, just my opinion about KC Elections being poorly staffed…..”

    Perhaps, but you are badly misinformed by your “other reading habit.” Sharkansky choses to use atypical “case studies” to evoke emotional responses from his readers, rather than providing objective quantitative analyses. The result is a very biased view of the KC elections process.

    In other words, you’ve been sucked in.

  111. 380

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:05 pm

    ENOUGH ALREADY @ 111

    “CHRIST GOLDY THOSE WERE GREAT QUESTIONS YOU ALLOWED DARCY TO ANSWER.YOUR A FUCKIN HACK.YOU MAY LAST TO THE END OF THE MONTH.DID YOUR BUDDY SIMMS BLOW YOU AFTER THE SHOW.AND WHO THE FUCK WERE THE TWO LAST WACK JOBS YOU HAD ON.THATA ALL FOR YOU BACK TO DRUDE AT LEAST HE CAN RUN A RADIO SHOW SOMETHING YOU ARE UNABLE TO DO.”

    Ahhh…yes, but you simply COULD NOT resist listening. You are, yet, another of those self-hating assholes who must punish themselves by listening to something they find painful.

    It’s assholes like you who are fucking up the world.

    But, be sure to listen next week…and imagine your mother strapping your ass with a belt—you’ll work out those deamons yet.

  112. 381

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:06 pm

    There are actually two kinds of inflation, monetary inflation and structural inflation. Bush’s deficit spending and the Federal Reserve’s easy-credit policies are creating monetary inflation. What makes these policies especially dangerous is that we have structural inflation in the form of permanently higher oil prices.

    The economic growth and rising living standards of the last 100 years is attributable in major part to the substitution of cheap oil for more expensive and less efficient energy sources such as coal. But as with any natural resource, the cheapest supplies of oil were the first used, and while they’re not yet used up , the cheap sources can no longer supply world demand, and we’re now consuming a mixture of Saudi oil that costs $2.50 a barrel to produce and more expensive oils, such as arctic oil and Canadian tar sands oil that costs up to $20 a barrel to produce. This situation will only get worse as the world’s aging supergiant fields, the source of cheap oil, dry up and the proportion of expensive oil in the overall supply increases.

    In other words, the rising productivity and living standards of the last century were the upslope of a bell shaped curve, and we’re now on the downslope of that curve. Unless we can overcome the rising real cost of oil with conservation and technology, living standards and real incomes in energy-intensive First World economies not only will stop rising but will fall.

    Inflation is the mechanism that will devalue our incomes and reduce our wealth. Higher real energy prices will spread through the entire economy, raising the price of virtually everything. Because businesses will face higher real costs, they will not be able to compensate their workers for higher nominal prices by raising wages. Prices will rise faster than incomes and the real standard of living will decline.

    Because we are entering a period of rising real energy costs, it is sheer madness to layer monetary inflation on top of it. Bush’s deficit-financed tax cuts are flooding the economy with devalued currency, and are stimulating the economy when it needs to be slowed. The Federal Reserve will have to raise interest rates to counteract the stimulative effect of Bush’s cheap money. If it doesn’t, inflation will explode into double digits as we saw in the wake of the deficit-financed Vietnam War, to be followed by double-digit interest rates and the double-digit unemployment that racked our nation during the Reagan Depression of 1982-1983.

    The inflation caused by rising real energy costs is a big enough monster by itself without asking for more trouble by indulging in monetary inflationary. Bush’s economic policies are folly, and we will pay dearly for his deceptively alluring tax cuts and deficit budgets.

  113. 382

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:07 pm

    111

    It couldn’t have been that bad … after all, you listened to it.

  114. 383

    rightwinger spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:11 pm

    Thanks for your support on mail voting only. Since you don’t know who actually fills out a mail ballot, and since corporate fascists have plenty of money, we ought to be able to buy enough votes to stay in power. I have long suspected that some of the votes we paid for weren’t actually cast in the voting booth; this way we can look at the vote before we pay for it.

  115. 384

    ENOUGH ALREADY spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:13 pm

    dj IS PISSED OF BECAUSE HE JUST FOUND OUT THAT HIS BROTHER IS HIS DAD.

  116. 385

    YO spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:22 pm

    HEY dJ ARE YOU SHARING THE AIRPLANE GLUE WITH YOUR BUDS.REMEMBER TO TAKE A GOOD SUCK.OH THATS RIGHT YOUR GOOD AT SUCKING.LOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSER

  117. 386

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:24 pm

    rightwinger @ 117

    “Thanks for your support on mail voting only. Since you don’t know who actually fills out a mail ballot, and since corporate fascists have plenty of money, we ought to be able to buy enough votes to stay in power. I have long suspected that some of the votes we paid for weren’t actually cast in the voting booth; this way we can look at the vote before we pay for it.”

    Is this bad satire, or are you fucking babbling?

  118. 387

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:25 pm

    ENOUGH ALREADY @ 118

    “dj IS PISSED OF BECAUSE HE JUST FOUND OUT THAT HIS BROTHER IS HIS DAD”

    Yes, but what better day to learn this than father’s day.

    Ok…show over, EA, go back to hating yourself….

  119. 388

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:28 pm

    There is NO oil replacement on the horizon. One of the fundamental determinants of real energy costs is the amount of energy input needed to extract the resource. In Saudi oilfields, it takes the equivalent of 1 barrel of oil to extract 30 barrels.

    The poverty of the “hydrogen economy” touted by Bush is illustrated by the fact that it takes more than 1 unit of energy input to get 1 unit of energy. With current technology, hydrogen is not an “energy source” at all, but merely an energy medium — a means of converting one form of energy into another, that comes at a net cost in energy.

    None of the potential energy substitutes for oil have an energy input to energy output ratio anywhere near 1:30. Those with the best potential, such as the most efficient biofuels production processes, are in the range of 1:2 to 1:3. In other words, you have to produce 40 barrels of biodiesel to fill a 30-gallon fuel tank. The rest is consumed by farm machinery and the processing plant. Producing marginal oil, such as that from deepwater petroleum deposits, arctic fields, tar sands, and shale oil, require much higher energy inputs than Middle East oil. Converting coal to petroleum products requires even higher inputs.

    When input-to-output ratios fall to that level, you get in a position where you need to produce 300 million barrels of oil-equivalent to get 200 million barrels of consumable products. That has major implications for the real cost of energy inputs into our economy, and for economic efficiency and productivity. We simply aren’t going to get as much consumption from a given amount of economic inputs in the future.

  120. 389

    dj spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:29 pm

    YO @ 119

    Scene: a fish-like chromosomal abnormality raises it silvery head and squeaks out:

    “HEY dJ ARE YOU SHARING THE AIRPLANE GLUE WITH YOUR BUDS.REMEMBER TO TAKE A GOOD SUCK.OH THATS RIGHT YOUR GOOD AT SUCKING.LOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSER”

    Awwwwww…YO…you are still hanging in there. YO is normally a lethal anuploidy, but our own little horsesass.org YO has been hanging tough. He may look like a fish and have the IQ of a fish scale, but he is ours…all ours.

    Hang tough, little fella. We love you.

  121. 390

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:30 pm

    117

    I’m convinced Republicans are cheating and stealing elections, but not by the means you describe. The GOP’s m.o. is to suppress voter turnout in areas that favor the opposition by a variety of means, and possibly to stuff the ballot boxes by manipulating electronic voting machines.

  122. 391

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:59 pm

    Prof. Jared Diamond, in his book “Collapse,” analyzes examples of ancient and contemporary societal collapses. His striking conclusion is that in these cases, environmental degradation was the cause of economic collapses that led to poverty, depopulation, and social unrest.

    Environmental degradation takes many forms, the most serious of which is deforestation. But soil erosion and salinization, water pollution, and overexploitation of food sources also play a role in rendering human habitats uninhabitable.

    It is now believed, for example, that the American Southwest’s cliff dwelling communities were abandoned because of deforestation and soil erosion that rendered the surrounding land incapable of producing adequate food supplies.

    Easter Island is perhaps the world’s best example of a microcosm human society. This island was merely the remotest and last of the Pacific islands to be colonized by peoples who originated from the Asian mainland. After a few centuries of human occupation, Easter Island was denuded of the large trees required to make the ocean-going canoes that got the original settlers to the island in the first place, and from then on, Easter Island’s native population was totally isolated from the rest of the world and completely deprived of the ability to obtain by trade any needed materials or goods not available on the island itself, until the arrival of European sailing ships in the late 1700s. By then, the island’s overexploited environment had already collapsed, and the European explorers found only remnant survivors of what was once a populous and thriving civilization.

    Easter Island was completely denuded of trees, and subsequently lost nearly all of its native birds and animal species. When canoe-making wood became unavailable, the islanders lost access to most of the fish species they had been living on. Of course, they also ate all of the terrestrial fauna. When the end came, the only meat available to them was rats.

    Easter Island is a windy place, and once the island was stripped of its trees, it also was stripped of its soils, and the settlers’ agriculture collapsed. The island ultimately suffered an extreme population crash, from an estimated 30,000 humans to a little over 100.

    Republicans scoff at environmentalists as alarmists, and respond to arguments that we must manage our resources for sustainability with hostility. The world and all of humanity are merely a macrocosm of Easter Island. Planet Earth is our capital, and if we eat our capital, the end result will be human extinction or at least a human population crash, accompanied by a drastic decline in living standards. We cannot cut our forests faster than they regrow without ultimately deforesting our continent and losing our wood resources. We cannot pump water out of underground aquifers faster than they recharge without drying up the aquifer and ending up with no water supply. We cannot extract nutrients from the soil faster than we put them back in without ultimately bankrupting the soil’s ability to grow useful crops. We cannot overfish the world’s fisheries without destroying them.

    Jared argues that First World consumption cannot be sustained. But we live in a world in which Third World populations aspire to First World living standards. The trend is toward increasing, not stable or decreasing, human impact on the planet’s resources.

    Jared also points out that collapses occur very quickly. A human society that took centuries or millenia to reach its peak population and consumption of resources can collapse in as little as 10 to 20 years. The trajectory of environmental overexploitation and resource exhaustion is not a symmetrical bell-shaped curve; it is a gradual upward climb followed by a vertical plunge.

    Wingnuts may be right about one thing: If we follow their stupid environmental policies, the end of the world could be just around the corner.

  123. 392

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Sunday, 6/18/06 at 11:59 pm

    When all you stupid humans are dead, rabbits will rule!

  124. 393

    Progressive spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 12:30 am

    I am not impressed with Darcy Burner. Too cowardly to pledge to bring the troops home now. If she get elected, she will join all the other cogs in the war machine. The blood of all those people yet to die in the imperialistic aggression will be on the hands of those that vote for her.

  125. 394

    dj spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 12:32 am

    “Progressive” @ 127

    “she will join all the other cogs in the war machine.”

    Umm…and just what evidence do you base this on? Or are you just another wingnut spouting bullshit?

  126. 395

    skagit spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 12:55 am

    Liked the show tonight. Glad I don’t have to make a decision whether or not to vote for Darcy. She’s a little on the lightweight side . . . just doesn’t have the conviction in her voice, or sound like she has the maturity to stand up to the big guys. I don’t know. I wasn’t impressed. Sort of like she was running for president of the senior class.

    Liked the hour with Sims and Philips because you let them talk a lot. I like hearing what guests have to say. So many hosts try to be starts themselves. You listen very well. Same thing with Connelly. He sounded a little put out at first but came around. Also, thanks again for letting people who call in finish their sentences/thoughts. Well done.

    Finally, the blogging hour was so-so. Keep it from being too inside – too much neighborliness. Make it more informative. Net neutrality would have been a great issue. Or bloggers with a little more passion for the topic. Pike Place guy was more interesting. What is wrong with women . . . why do they always have to come across as cute. Molly needs more passion.

    Well, that’s my review of your program tonight, Goldy. And since I’m a media consultant in disguise, you should listen to me. (not) (LOL)

  127. 396

    Progressive spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 1:10 am

    DJ @128,

    I haven’t heard her take a stand on pulling the troops out. Did I miss it? (Please say yes). What is her plan to pull the troops out?

    So please tell me, what is your opinion of those Democrats that went along with Bush in his imperialistic war?

    I am frankly tired of people who say one thing and do another.

    “Am I a wingnut?” (dj)

    Shit. Are you really a progressive?

  128. 397

    Pike Place guy spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 1:56 am

    skagit:

    Is it that, for you, women seem to have a “passion deficit”? I think Mollie did pretty well, considering that it was only our second time on radio (at least for me).

    As for Darcy Burner, she’s not some firebrand crazy person. She’s competant and fair, and doesn’t take marching orders from anyone (unlike the Sheriff).

    What is wrong with women . . . why do they always have to come across as cute?

    Why does Mollie come across as cute? Maybe because she IS cute. But thanks for the compliment.

  129. 398

    skagit spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 2:03 am

    I think it is nice of your to care . . . maybe she was just off her game or a little tentative in the limelight. I’m for more women in media and in politics. Esp. politics because I think women bring a different perspective and one that is sorely needed. But, they have to have it in their hearts as well as their minds and the passion has to show. I watched Murtha on TV and there was so much she could have added to the discussion. just so much!

  130. 399

    skagit spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 2:07 am

    I was talking about Mollie above. As for Darcy, time will tell.

  131. 400

    skagit spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 2:21 am

    Pike Place Man . . .

    forget what I said above . . . KIRO is a big-time radio and schmoozing with friends won’t make it. Mollie, you and anybody else that wants David to succeed has to be up to the job. The talk has to be engaging and interesting. So, I don’t care if she’s cute or you’re offended or anything else. I like the show and want it to stay on.

    RE Darcy . . . same thing. She may be just the perfect little candidate according to you but if she can’t sell herself, she’s going nowhere. And what I heard tonight doesn’t sound promising. So, again, we’ll see.

  132. 401

    LeftTurn spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 6:20 am

    Rubberstamp Reichert

  133. 402

    dj spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 8:44 am

    “progressive” @ 130

    “I haven’t heard her take a stand on pulling the troops out. Did I miss it? (Please say yes). What is her plan to pull the troops out?”

    I don’t think she discussed the war in the roughly 15 minutes on the air. However she is not a hawk (I’ve discussed this with her in a small group setting).

    What the fuck were you thinking…that we are going to solve the Iraq quagmire by keeping Riechert in office? I think it is fair to say that Burner falls to the left of Murtha….

    “So please tell me, what is your opinion of those Democrats that went along with Bush in his imperialistic war?”

    Well, first, I am not a Democrat, so I will not even parse this into a Dem v. Pub issue. I was pissed—really pissed—at those who voted to transfer that power from congress to the President. I though the administration’s snow job about the dangers of Iraq were complete bullshit, and since then we have learned that war with Iraq was pre-determined, and the justification was built on lies and exaggerations. Indeed, I believe the lawmakers who were naive enought to be hoodwinked by BushCo should be punished, but those needs are secondary to (1) removing as much power as possible from the incompetent, lying administration, (2) holding BushCo accountable for their war crimes and crimes against Americans. Putting Darcy in office will take us one step closer to those two goals.

    “I am frankly tired of people who say one thing and do another.”

    I learned my lesson about being pragmatic a long time ago—when I voted for John Anderson for president, thereby contributed to Ronald Reagan’s victory.

    “Shit. Are you really a progressive?”

    I’m a liberal…some of my views are progressive, others less so.

  134. 403

    Donny Most spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 9:12 am

    I’m voting for anyone with a D. in front of their name. Republicans can go take a hike over a scenic cliff that they just sold to cover some of the interest on the debt they’ve incurred in our name.

    Republicans have learned how to get elected by playing on people’s prejudices but most Americans are on to that game. Republican equals irresponsibility and incompetence in the minds of the majority of Americans.

  135. 404

    Roger Rabbit spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 11:28 am

    129

    Yeah, I know you wingfucks like certainty — you’d rather be dead wrong than a little indecisive.

  136. 405

    howcanyoubePROUDtobeanASS spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 1:17 pm

    Yeah, I know you wingfucks like certainty – you’d rather be dead wrong than a little indecisive. -Commentby Roger Rabbit— 6/19/06@ 11:28 am

    Actually rabbit, there was an editorial about that very thing today in WND. (I know, I know…ewww right wing, blah, blah, blah,…just don’t go there, the riff is stale.)

  137. 406

    Josef in Marummy Country spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 2:46 pm

    Commentby dj— 6/18/06@ 8:18 pm

    NO, I didn’t want another partisan like Dean Logan or Mary Lane counting votes.

  138. 407

    Puddybud Fitzgerald Kennedy spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 7:13 pm

    You answer my fucking question, what is your source for disputing climate change?

    Vomitted by K— 6/18/06@ 6:09 pm

    http://www.canadafreepress.com.....061206.htm

    K: Canadian Free Press already answered it last week. When For the Cluesless tried to call the person on it, he put forth those lefties who advertise on the site.

    Poll on Global Warming
    Find results of the first-ever sportsmen/global warming poll
    http://www.TargetGlobalWarming.org

    Facts On Global Warming
    Learn about global warming Resources, essays, opportunities
    http://www.globalwarmingisreal.com

    Save Energy
    Get a free Energy Survey now and stop burning a hole in your profits
    http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/burn

    Peak Oil News/Discussion
    The Oil Drum is the web’s premier peak oil and energy community
    http://www.theoildrum.com

    Al Gore Book
    An Inconvenient Truth Global warming and what we can do.
    http://www.read-the-truth.com

  139. 408

    Progressive spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 8:24 pm

    dj@136,

    “I don’t think she discussed the war in the roughly 15 minutes on the air. However she is not a hawk (I’ve discussed this with her in a small group setting).”

    The most important issue of the day and she didn’t say one word. Tells me a lot.

    “What the fuck were you thinking…that we are going to solve the Iraq quagmire by keeping Riechert in office? I think it is fair to say that Burner falls to the left of Murtha….”

    That is a fucking red herring. I never advocated anyone voting for him. But what does it gain us to put in a puppet that will go along with the Reicherts out there? In Germany, the Nazi’s were able to aminain control nto because they had soldiers to keep the people in line, but because they had passive people who, while didn’t advocate killing the jews, they didn’t oppose it with all their being either.

    Lack of full on opposition amounts to tacit cooperation with the war machine.

    “Well, first, I am not a Democrat, so I will not even parse this into a Dem v. Pub issue. I was pissed—really pissed—at those who voted to transfer that power from congress to the President. I though the administration’s snow job about the dangers of Iraq were complete bullshit, and since then we have learned that war with Iraq was pre-determined, and the justification was built on lies and exaggerations. Indeed, I believe the lawmakers who were naive enought to be hoodwinked by BushCo should be punished, but those needs are secondary to (1) removing as much power as possible from the incompetent, lying administration, (2) holding BushCo accountable for their war crimes and crimes against Americans. Putting Darcy in office will take us one step closer to those two goals.”

    Is she is so ashamed to even talk about taking a stand, how can I trust that once she gets in she will take a stand? She seems to be even afraid to talk about opposing the war.

    “I learned my lesson about being pragmatic a long time ago—when I voted for John Anderson for president, thereby contributed to Ronald Reagan’s victory.”

    You call it pragmatic, I call it not being true to your beliefs. I would rather lose on principle than win on “pragmatism”. Your “pragmatism” helped get us into this damn war in the first place.

    Frankly, if this country is going to be an rogue nation in the world’s eyes, I’d rather progressives not be associated with it in any way.

    If no politician has the courage to take a stand then this damn war will continue on and on and on. And while you sit at home, comfortable in your “pragmatism” innocent people are being blown to bits.

    Congratulations on your being liberal and not progressive. When the final history is written and the last body counted, liberals and conservatives alike will bear the burden of the hundreds of thousands who have ben destroyed.

  140. 409

    Progressive spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 8:30 pm

    Is there no one who has the courage to act to stop this insanity? Or is the intoxicating effect of power so alluring as to anesthetize the conscience?

    Is it too much to ask that any politician asking for your vote publicly say what they shall do and publicly do what they say? Or has our humanity taken second seat to our zeal to win at all costs, even our soul?

  141. 410

    skagit spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 9:19 pm

    America has no conscience anymore. Hasn’t that been obvious since 2004?

    Sometimes I’m resigned to it. After we kill all living creatures besides ourselves, we’ll start on ourselves. A macro Easter Island . . . Maybe since this seems inevitable, we are the fools for not enjoying the ride while we can.

  142. 411

    dj spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 10:39 pm

    “Progressive” @ 142

    “The most important issue of the day and she didn’t say one word. Tells me a lot.”

    Hey, asshole, if you didn’t call in and ask a question, then quit ya bitching. Sheesh…why do you expect other people to do YOUR fucking research?

    “That is a fucking red herring. I never advocated anyone voting for him. But what does it gain us to put in a puppet that will go along with the Reicherts out there?”

    What the fuck are you talking about? Puppet of Reichert???? That is your impression of Darcy? If so, you’re fucking daffy.

    “In Germany, the Nazi’s were able to aminain control nto because they had soldiers to keep the people in line, but because they had passive people who, while didn’t advocate killing the jews, they didn’t oppose it with all their being either.”

    Yes…indeed…looney and babbling. I think you need to get to know Darcy…I am certain you will be pleasantly surprised.

    “Lack of full on opposition amounts to tacit cooperation with the war machine.”

    Ummmm…no…not unless you are whacked out at one end of the ideological spectrum or the other. Your statement amounts to saying that the only solution is a revolution. And, that ain’t going to happen. If you are unwilling to work within the political system (i.e. by voting and using your freedom of expression to effectively convince lawmakers and other citizens to change their views, enact change, and put better electeds in office) then you are, in effect, doing nothing at all.

    “Is she is so ashamed to even talk about taking a stand, how can I trust that once she gets in she will take a stand? She seems to be even afraid to talk about opposing the war.”

    Ummm…no, I think she just did not have the opportunity. Again, I have heard her speak on the topic of Bush’s blunder. I think most left-leaning folks would strongly approve of her stances. But, since the topic did not come up in 15 minutes of airtime, you are dismissing her as a “Reichert puppet?” If so you are a fucking fool. If you really need to know her stances, why not contact her campaign and get a statement from them? Or show up at one of her public events and ask her? She is very approachable.

    “You call it pragmatic, I call it not being true to your beliefs. I would rather lose on principle than win on “pragmatism”.”

    The difference is that I prefer to WIN. I mean, idealism is great, and communicating idealistic positions is an important part of political speech for persuasion of electeds and citizens. But, idealism has minimal place at the ballot box (in our electoral system, anyway), where elections almost always come down to run-offs between two people. One of those people will pursue goals more in line with your thinking, one will not. In November, either Darcy Burner or Dave Reichert will win. If Darcy wins she will pursue a progressive agenda. If Reichert wins he will continue being a tool of the PNAC Wingnuts. If you want progressive change, help put Darcy in office. It is as simple as that.

    “Your “pragmatism” helped get us into this damn war in the first place.”

    No…I believe the assholes who voted for Bush and Nader got us into this war. Are you one of those assholes who voted for Nader, “progressive?”

    “Frankly, if this country is going to be an rogue nation in the world’s eyes, I’d rather progressives not be associated with it in any way.”

    Oh…now THERE’S a practical suggestion. (NOT!)

    “If no politician has the courage to take a stand then this damn war will continue on and on and on.”

    Agreed…but the way that is going to happen through the electoral process is FIRST to get rid of the Wingnut majority in one or both chambers of congress.

    “And while you sit at home, comfortable in your “pragmatism” innocent people are being blown to bits.”

    Nope…I am actually very active on a number of fronts in getting rid of the Wingnuts and protesting the war. You, on the other hand, seem to be bitching and launching into hyperbole that has nothing PRACTICAL to offer. Have you been raising funds for “your” candidates? Have you been donating your own money to get someone better elected? Have you been using your creative skills to get a progressive message out to the masses? (I’ve been working on all of these fronts.)

    “Congratulations on your being liberal and not progressive. “

    Why thank you. Although, as I mentioned before I am progressive on some issues and less so on others.

    “When the final history is written and the last body counted, liberals and conservatives alike will bear the burden of the hundreds of thousands who have ben destroyed.”

    I strongly suspect you are wrong. History will largely blame the Bush administration and the PNAC Wingnuts for misleading the American people and the Congress in something of a 9/11-induced witch-hunt. History will recognize BushCo as pursuing a disastrously naive invasion of Iraq. With any luck, history will record trials in The Hague, conviction and execution of Bush and his top aids for crimes against humanity. But, don’t hold your breath on that last one.

    In closing Mr./Ms. Progressive, your ideas seem so whacked out that it is difficult to tell whether you are genuine (albeit naive) progressive or whether you are a wingnut shill.

  143. 412

    Mike Webb Sucks spews:

    Monday, 6/19/06 at 10:39 pm

    Puddy: You are so right about the Canada Free Press. But those liberals don’t read, they don’t think, they smile and swallow the white streaky kool-aid

  144. 413

    Progressive spews:

    Tuesday, 6/20/06 at 1:47 am

    145 – “dj”

    “Hey, asshole, if you didn’t call in and ask a question, then quit ya bitching. Sheesh…why do you expect other people to do YOUR fucking research?”

    I tried to call in but I only had a cell phone. I am on the road a lot for my work.

    I heard Gregoire tell Bush to bring the troops home. I haven’t heard anything out of Darcy’s campaign that even comes close.

    “What the fuck are you talking about? Puppet of Reichert???? That is your impression of Darcy? If so, you’re fucking daffy.”

    What in the hell do you call all the Democrats “Liberals” who voted for the god damn war asshole? The loyal opposition? I call them motherfucking warmonger puppets. I could care less what the hell the letter is after their name. Did it matter to the dead jews in Germany if it was the Gestapo or the SS that lit the match for the ovens? The motherfuckers were still dead you moron.

    “No…I believe the assholes who voted for Bush and Nader got us into this war. Are you one of those assholes who voted for Nader, “progressive?””

    Only assholes who sent the people that voted for the war are responsable. Did you vote for one of them? My vote for Nader was a vote for principle. The damn D or R, who gives a fuck if the outcome is the same?

    We trusted those motherfucker Democrats to oppose Bush. Instead they all got down on their knees and polished his motherfucking knob! I call that whoring bitch. And if you aren’t willing to make sure that the person you vote for is iron clad set to stop this fucking war, then you are just as responsible for it.

    Well you “protested” isn’t that sweet. I bet you got your picture on TV so mommy could say “Look, there is my little Dick Job right there! “. Meanwhile ten Iraqi kids just got all of the innards blown out like confetti. But I guess as long as Dick Job “Feels Good” it is OK huh?

    “If Darcy wins she will pursue a progressive agenda.”

    Now how do you know that for sure? All those people that voted for the Democrats that said THEY would persue a progressive agenda and turned around and voted for that fucking war.

    All I really want is for her to publicly sign a pledge stating she will filibuster if necessary to end the war. Think about it. If she filibusters, the war machine grinds to a halt. No money, no bullets no war. You act like I am asking for a left nut or something. All I want is proof before I hand over my support.

    You can go here to see who voted for the Iraq War:
    http://www.senate.gov/legislat.....vote=00237

    Cantwell voted for it. She has blood on her hands. I want to make sure we do not get another Cantwell. If I vote for Dacry Burner and she pulls a Cantwell, then I am just as guilty as if I had voted for Reichert, now aren’t I?

    Consoling ones self because they voted Democrat isn’t going to put those little Iraqi kids back together.

    If it is too much for Darcy Burner to publicly pledge to filibuster the war until the machine comes to a grinding halt, then she isn’t worthy of progressive voters.

  145. 414

    dj spews:

    Tuesday, 6/20/06 at 9:06 am

    “Progressive” @ 148

    “I heard Gregoire tell Bush to bring the troops home. I haven’t heard anything out of Darcy’s campaign that even comes close.”

    Ummm…earth to “progressive,” Darcy Burner is not an elected official (yet). She has, however, discussed strategies for stopping the Bush war machine. Have you read her diaries on Kos?

    “What in the hell do you call all the Democrats “Liberals” who voted for the god damn war asshole? The loyal opposition? “

    First, you are mistaken about what they voted “for.” Your analysis that they “voted for war” is simplistic and ahistoric. Secondly, you are forgetting that the constitution makes the President the Commander-in-Chief. Bush would have invaded with our without authorization. Since Bush has decided he has unlimited executive power, and he has never shown any fiscal responsibility, I doubt threats of cutting off funding to the military would have stopped him.

    Having said that, I think all of the politicians who voted in favor of the authorization made a grave mistake. Should they have known better? Probably. The problem is that they were being lied to and whipped up into a post-911 frenzy. (The lies were transparent to me.) I have no problem with punishing them at the polls. But, why take it out on Darcy, someone who offers us the possibility of ripping control of the House out of the clutches of the Republicans? Do you want to see Bush impeached (I would!), then get a Democratic majority!

    “Only assholes who sent the people that voted for the war are responsable. Did you vote for one of them? My vote for Nader was a vote for principle. The damn D or R, who gives a fuck if the outcome is the same?”

    Your vote for Nader helped elect Bush, you fucking idiot! Do you believe that Kerry or Gore would have gone windmill-tilting into Iraq? Unlikely. Thanks, asshole, for putting the wingnut warmongers in power. Despite your assertions otherwise, the decision to invade was made by BushCo–you know, the Commander-In-Chief and his handlers.

    “We trusted those motherfucker Democrats to oppose Bush.”

    Yes…but the Republicans held the majority in both chambers at the time (and they still do)?

    “Instead they all got down on their knees and polished his motherfucking knob! I call that whoring bitch. And if you aren’t willing to make sure that the person you vote for is iron clad set to stop this fucking war, then you are just as responsible for it.”

    Well, you naively seem to be assuming that Burner is “pro-war” because she did not discuss it in a 15 minute, caller-driven interview. Read some of what Burner has written before you spew your bullshit. The fact is, if Burner loses, the GOP will likely retain control of the house. Period.

    “Well you “protested” isn’t that sweet. I bet you got your picture on TV so mommy could say “Look, there is my little Dick Job right there! “. Meanwhile ten Iraqi kids just got all of the innards blown out like confetti. But I guess as long as Dick Job “Feels Good” it is OK huh?”

    Actually, my political advocacy has been far more effective than that (but at the local level). Even so, ummm…what were you doing while those same Iraqi kids got their innards blown out? Were you whining about how there is no solution? Sorry, dolt, the slaughtering of innocent Iraqi’s isn’t going to end with assholes like you whining about how bad the Democrats are on a liberal blog. Your vote for Nader shows how disconnected from reality you are.

    “All I really want is for her to publicly sign a pledge stating she will filibuster if necessary to end the war. “

    Go fuck yourself, asshole. Darcy has publically stated her opposition to the war. If that isn’t good enough for you, then you are a fool. Seriously…think about how this has to ACTUALLY works, not about how it works in OZ. You already fucked up by putting an warmongering idiot in office. Don’t fuck this election up, too.

    “Think about it. If she filibusters, the war machine grinds to a halt. No money, no bullets no war. You act like I am asking for a left nut or something. All I want is proof before I hand over my support.”

    Ummm…again, you think you are better off with Reichert in office? Let’s see…on one hand we have a Bush-Delay lapdog Republican. On the other hand we have a progressive individual who has stated in writing her opposition to the war (but didn’t mention it in 15 minutes of air time last sunday). Hmmmmm….tough choice, isn’t it.

    “Cantwell voted for it. She has blood on her hands. I want to make sure we do not get another Cantwell. If I vote for Dacry Burner and she pulls a Cantwell, then I am just as guilty as if I had voted for Reichert, now aren’t I?”

    No…if you VOTE FOR NADER you have blood on your hands, you fucking dipshit!

    “Consoling ones self because they voted Democrat isn’t going to put those little Iraqi kids back together.”

    Then the same must be said many times over for voting for Nader.

    “If it is too much for Darcy Burner to publicly pledge to filibuster the war until the machine comes to a grinding halt, then she isn’t worthy of progressive voters.”

    Sorry, punk, but “progressive voters” are interested in many issues in addition to Bush’s blunderous war. You do not speak for “progressive voters.” You are an overly-idealistic child who don’t seem to understand the realities of how politics works.

    But, who am I to tell you how to vote. It your vote afterall (I mean, assuming you have reached the age of 18). If you don’t like Darcy, don’t vote for her. But, if you are basing that on what she didn’t say during a 15 minutes talk radio show, your an idiot. And, you will be contributing to the status quo.

    If you were really interested (rather than being an idealistic whiner), you would know a lot more about Darcy than you appear to know. Grow-up and do some serious research before you spew your bullshit.

  146. 415

    Had Enough Yet? spews:

    Saturday, 6/24/06 at 9:04 pm

    What a Babe!

  147. 416

    Anonymous spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 7:57 pm

  148. 417

    Anonymous spews:

    Sunday, 7/2/06 at 9:13 pm

  149. 418

    QZTvdQUEC6 spews:

    Tuesday, 7/4/06 at 1:02 pm

    PkF1 VQ3AQlG
    nNJf2PS
    SD2HMQVr8J
    mo5ygWtXE
    lRZmisQhY
    mXYo0a7
    cY1HXofNBSV sFKyfGwSxxN eZPOpkv2 Wje1rUKAWiC4Nw75g Z415jmhS8SW bMl7aeV71i 7ZNVEIU5p92oDZRNM
    iS5k0TwZ
    p9o2k
    kObkrnpTD
    CVJt5u0
    CY5SO6zd
    O9Dvg9x

  150. 419

    naomi spews:

    Wednesday, 7/5/06 at 3:18 am

    esrbesawehsej

  151. 420

    naomi spews:

    Wednesday, 7/5/06 at 3:29 am

    esrbesawehsej

Recent HA Brilliance…

  • Friday Open Thread Friday, 5/23/25
  • Wednesday Open Thread Wednesday, 5/21/25
  • Drinking Liberally — Seattle Tuesday, 5/20/25
  • Monday Open Thread Monday, 5/19/25
  • Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza! Friday, 5/16/25
  • Friday! Friday, 5/16/25
  • Wednesday! Wednesday, 5/14/25
  • Drinking Liberally — Seattle Tuesday, 5/13/25
  • Monday Open Thread Monday, 5/12/25
  • Friday Night Multimedia Extravaganza! Friday, 5/9/25

Tweets from @GoldyHA

I no longer use Twitter because, you know, Elon is a fascist. But I do post occasionally to BlueSky @goldyha.bsky.social

From the Cesspool…

  • Vicious Troll on Friday Open Thread
  • Vicious Troll on Friday Open Thread
  • Vicious Troll on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
  • RedReformed on Friday Open Thread
  • RedReformed on Friday Open Thread
  • Elijah Dominic McDotcom on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread
  • Roger Rabbit on Friday Open Thread

Please Donate

Currency:

Amount:

Archives

Can’t Bring Yourself to Type the Word “Ass”?

Eager to share our brilliant political commentary and blunt media criticism, but too genteel to link to horsesass.org? Well, good news, ladies: we also answer to HASeattle.com, because, you know, whatever. You're welcome!

Search HA

Follow Goldy

[iire_social_icons]

HA Commenting Policy

It may be hard to believe from the vile nature of the threads, but yes, we have a commenting policy. Comments containing libel, copyright violations, spam, blatant sock puppetry, and deliberate off-topic trolling are all strictly prohibited, and may be deleted on an entirely arbitrary, sporadic, and selective basis. And repeat offenders may be banned! This is my blog. Life isn’t fair.

© 2004–2025, All rights reserved worldwide. Except for the comment threads. Because fuck those guys. So there.