15 laterals, according to this morning’s fishwrapper. For comparison, the (in)famous November 20, 1982 Cal Band play that beat Stanford on the game’s final play included a mere five laterals.
6
Piper Scottspews:
By the looks of it, there were more players and officials on the field than fans in the stands.
And aren’t 15 laterals about the norm for Pee Wee Football? Or is that 15 fumbles?
The Piper
7
Adam Kelperspews:
my office is impressed – and there are few football hardcore here
makes the seadogs look like slackers
what a play – really creative and laaaaaateeeerrrraaallll
8
Proud To Be An Assspews:
I want to see how the coach diagrammed that play.
9
Dinaspews:
Cool!
10
YLBspews:
That was too weird. Didn’t the ball hit the ground on one lateral? Does that count?
I think that play is the perfect metaphor for how the Republicans might win the White House in 2008.
@1
I tried to embed it again. Is it there?
As for how the Republicans might win the White House, I don’t see them doing it without breaking the rules and having the refs look the other way… :)
O’ good god, I go away for a few days and you start running sports clips. Gag.
THE BAND IS ON THE FIELD!
15 laterals, according to this morning’s fishwrapper. For comparison, the (in)famous November 20, 1982 Cal Band play that beat Stanford on the game’s final play included a mere five laterals.
By the looks of it, there were more players and officials on the field than fans in the stands.
And aren’t 15 laterals about the norm for Pee Wee Football? Or is that 15 fumbles?
The Piper
my office is impressed – and there are few football hardcore here
makes the seadogs look like slackers
what a play – really creative and laaaaaateeeerrrraaallll
I want to see how the coach diagrammed that play.
Cool!
That was too weird. Didn’t the ball hit the ground on one lateral? Does that count?