A few days back I accused the Seattle Times editorial board of selectively championing taxpayers, “you know, when it suits its purposes,” so it was kinda amusing to see Joni Balter pick up the same exact meme in yesterday’s column attacking Mayor Mike McGinn: “A tax protector when it suits.”
Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn worries that cost overruns on the downtown deep-bore tunnel will hurt taxpayers, so he plans to veto formal agreements related to the viaduct-replacement project.
To the uninitiated, the mayor is looking out for us. But the mayor is only a friend of taxpayers when it suits his agenda.
The same mayor said he wants Seattle residents to pay for light rail on the west side of the city — which is so full of pitfalls and unknowns it could cost hundreds of millions of dollars or more. And he wants light rail across the Highway 520 bridge, in addition to already-agreed-upon light rail across Interstate 90. Presumably, Seattleites and Eastsiders would be on the hook for this, though no price or source of revenue has been identified.
A tax protector one day becomes a big spender the next.
Pot, meet kettle.
Balter goes on to lambast McGinn for championing the Parks Levy that was widely passed by voters in 2008, a truly ridiculous argument that I was planning to thoroughly deconstruct before Slog’s Dominic Holden got there first, so I might as well just blockquote him:
She’s got it backwards when she says that McGinn is pushing expenses on taxpayers. Taxpayers signed up for the cost of parks and light rail (that the Seattle Timesopposed). And McGinn says that if residents want more light rail, the taxpayers would have to vote on that, too. But the tunnel tab is being pushed on taxpayers who didn’t sign up for it. In fact, the one time when the public had a say in a tunnel, albeit a different sort of tunnel, they rejected it. McGinn—like or dislike his politics or strategy—is trying to protect taxpayers from something they didn’t commit to. It’s not the same thing and nobody should be duped by this comparison.
See the difference, Joni? The Parks Levy and Link Light Rail, these were both approved by voters, as would be McGinn’s proposed in-city light rail extension, should it come into being. But the Big Bore? Not so much. Yeah sure, McGinn is opposed to the tunnel on ideological grounds, but he’s got a pretty damned good argument to make about protecting taxpayers from shouldering cost overruns from a state managed project they didn’t vote for, and that is the most expensive, least studied and by far the riskiest of the three major Viaduct replacement alternatives.
As Dominic further points out, Balter also dramatically overstates the cost to the city’s general fund of operating and maintaining new parks acquisitions ($160,000 in 2011, not the $750,000 Balter claims), but I think more shameful is the way she conflates by inference general fund revenues with those from special purpose voter approved levies:
In the next month or so, you will hear cries from all quarters about cuts coming to police, fire, libraries, parks and social services. Woulda coulda shoulda. What if we didn’t bless every spending measure that comes our way? What if we deferred park acquisition a few years? How many cops and library hours could we buy with maintenance and operating funds dedicated to new parks — an estimated $750,000 in 2011 and $1.8 million by 2015. A cop costs $100,000 a year and a one-week library closure saves about $650,000.
Perhaps Balter understands the way city budgets work, but I’d wager the majority of voters don’t, and columns like hers don’t do much to educate the public. The voter approved levies and sales taxes dedicated to things like parks and light rail have little or nothing to do with the general operating budget, which is almost entirely funded through the city’s statutory property, sales and B&O tax authority, not through voter approved special taxes. The two have nothing to do with each other.
Like the county, the city’s property tax revenues have been capped at one percent annual growth, thanks to the incredibly stupid and unsustainable limits imposed by I-747, and then reimposed by a cowardly legislature after that measure was tossed out by the courts. This forced the city to rely even more on sales and B&O taxes, thus exacerbating the revenue shortfall during this prolonged economic downturn. That’s the real cause of our budget crisis: a bad economy and an inadequate tax structure.
So to even suggest that our budget problems stem from parks levies and light rail is just plain stupid. Or disingenuous. Or both.
Thor spews:
Joni made a good point, but should have made it without bringing up parks.
The thing McGinn needs to fix is that he makes more enemies than friends. In doing that, he fails the progressive causes he champions, for no really good reason, except maybe obdurate self reward?
The guy seems to be incapable of telling the whole truth. He makes straw men and tries to make himself look good next to them. Not working for me.
His tactics appear to be both stupid and disingenuous. Seattle desevres better.
sj spews:
Jeez … ANOTHER POT POST!
Proud To Be An Ass spews:
Balter vomits: “What if we didn’t bless every spending measure that comes our way?”
Wha? Hey Joni. What if we raised taxes substantially and funded mass transit, clean environment, and better education? Where the fuck would you rather live in 40 years? Here where we made these major investments or the wasteland that will soon be Colorado Springs?
Couple your lunatic economics with your overweening arrogance, and what do you get?
Unmitigated failure.
Proud To Be An Ass spews:
@2,
Put down the pipe slowly, SJ, and back away. Back away slowly and carefully–you’ll be OK.
Trust me.
SJ spews:
PTBAA
Oh ….
did I misinterpret the title?
Puddybud sez, Ask the arschloch the backend of every thread spews:
SJ,
You have to excuse The ASS. He’s naturally stupid. Maybe inbred like the arschloch!
Wells spews:
Seattle is not overrun with traffic, people do not need park space, and Seattle Times opinionators do not look clownish when their behinds come in swift contact with the floor, honk honk.
The deep-bore tunnel is either an atrocity (if it’s built) or a royal fiasco (if its proponents come to their senses before it’s too late). The only sensible tunnel is some version of the cut/cover Tunnelite. Automobile-related business interests (including the Seattle Times) have corrupted WSDOT and SDOT. Grace Crunican would look good in an orange jumpsuit.