Lots of medical marijuana news recently. Here’s a recap:
– Andy Hobbs writes in the Federal Way Mirror about the shortcomings of our state’s medical marijuana law along with the situation that patients and providers find themselves in as a result. There will be a part 2 posted later. UDPATE: Here’s part 2.
– The Tri-Cities Herald printed an interesting editorial suggesting that the way to solve Washington’s medical marijuana supply problems is to have the police supply patients with marijuana confiscated through drug raids. As Russ Belville points out, this is not a new idea, and it’s one that has been rejected by police agencies. It’s also not a very good idea in the first place. Medical marijuana patients should be getting marijuana that’s being grown by people who know what they’re doing, not from the police evidence locker where they can’t verify the age, purity, strain, etc.
The main obstacle to states establishing these kinds of distribution systems has been the federal government. That’s the reason why California’s loosely regulated system of dispensaries had been so loosely regulated. If a city or county documented a bunch of information about their operations, the DEA would simply obtain those records and shut down the operation. Any state that tried too hard to set up their own system put themselves in a position where the DEA and DOJ could quickly dismantle it.
But the entire dynamic may be changing. Attorney General Holder reiterated that the Obama Administration intends to respect state laws on medical marijuana, meaning that states should be free to establish their own systems for growing and distributing marijuana to patients without federal interference. New Mexico has been at the forefront of this, trying since 2007 to establish state authorized providers. Even with those reassurances from the Obama Administration, the initial state-authorized dispensary in Santa Fe was nervous about being named in news reports for fear that the DEA will move to shut them down.
– In Rhode Island this week, their state Senate voted 30-2 to legalize medical marijuana dispensaries. The answer to the dilemma raised in the Herald editorial is to move in the same direction as Rhode Island and New Mexico and establish more secure avenues for allowing medical marijuana patients to obtain their medicine from state-approved growers who grow specifically for patients. That the Rhode Island legislature can vote nearly unanimously to move in this direction while the Washington legislature is doing absolutely nothing about our clearly broken system just re-emphasizes the fact that we have a testicular deficiency in Olympia.
– UCLA-based anti-drug researcher Dr. Donald Tashkin now supports the legalization of marijuana. Tashkin is most well-known for conducting a study funded by the National Institute of Health, where he hypothesized that there’d be a definitive link between marijuana smoking and lung cancer, but discovered that there was “no association and even a suggestion of some protective effect”. Caren Woodson from Americans for Safe Access, a medical marijuana advocacy group in California, writes about some recent studies done on the use of marijuana for alleviating the pain associated with HIV/AIDS.
– Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty vetoed what would have been the most restrictive state medical marijuana law in the country. The legislature approved the bill after hearing some compelling testimony from patients and relatives. It’s been speculated that Pawlenty’s decision was made with an eye for a Presidential run in 2012, but it’s not entirely clear that vetoing the bill was the smarter move when nearly 3/4 of the American public supports medical marijuana laws. Instead, it may be a good indication of how detached the groupthink of the Republican leadership is from the reality of what the average American cares about.
– California dispensary operator Charles Lynch was sentenced to a year in prison. Many had hoped that since dispensary owners like Lynch are no longer being targeted under the Obama Administration that they’d support Judge George Wu’s request for leniency from the mandatory minimum sentencing restrictions.
It’s all about freedom. Live free, grow your own.
http://www.bcseeds.com/
hey steve, while you’re driving to the store to buy the ezwiders, are you free enough to not wear your seat belt?
The Mirror’s Part 2 is now live.
Hi 2,
It’s funny you should make that point, because it backfires.
Alcohol is the drug that’s related to traffic fatalities.
It has a two-pronged effect: it increases the confidence of drivers while simultaneously reducing their ability.
Strangely, other drugs, legal and otherwise, are not closely linked to fatal traffic crashes the way alcohol is.
I’m not arguing for making alcohol illegal, just pointing out how deranged it is to have the safer drug–in this case marajuana–be the one that’s illegal.
The reason you want to fasten your seatbelt is because of the legal drug out there.
Best,
new left conservative 1
Nice Medical Marijuana Updates. Keep it up.
I am going to share you a website from where you can get free information about marijuana, cannabis and hemp.
Marijuana
IMHO part of the reason why California’s Prop215 was written the way it was serves to demonstrate how pointlessly convoluted and unworkable the cannabis prohibition laws are in the first place.
It’s sort of like pointing out that the Emperor is not only buck naked, but covered in running sores from an STD. And given the way the DrugWarriors have behaved since Prop215’s passage, one could be forgiven for thinking that they suffered from insanity caused by that STD.
Their reaction has been worlds of magnitude out of proportion to any supposed ‘damage’ the law itself had on those who voted for it…namely none, for as the history since then has demonstrated, the greatest sources of misery for responsible cannabis users have been the cannabis prohibition laws, not the drug, itself.
In short, Prop215 showed how inherently stupid the cannabis prohibition laws are. That, in turn, casts aspersions about the intelligence of those who favor them…and they don’t like that one bit.
Dogs should just say no:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....14487.html
Lee,
Thanks for keeping this in the in the public eye. I support full legalization of marijuana and believe the 70-year campaign against it is the worst example of government skulduggery in the past 500 years.
Here‘s an edited transcript of an interesting speech given by Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance.
It’s about why many so-called ‘progressives’ are engaged in moral and intellectual cowardice when it comes to the issue of the impact that drug prohibition has on ‘progressive’s natural allies, the minorities. Pretty damning stuff.
Just for balance, I posted a very good interview with Dr. Tashkin, the principle investigator of the study of effects of marijuana smoking.
The bottom line is that it is up to each individual to choose what risks they are willing to take.
r. Tashkin’s video does a great job of presenting the data and I have tried to add to that with as few comments.
In effect, there are compelling reasons to expect that marijuana smoke should be worse than tobacco smoke. This study did not find that result. If this is enough to reassure you, smoke away.
Myself, if it were legally available, I would buy my diet nutbars made with MJ.
SJ said:
“Myself, if it were legally available, I would buy my diet nutbars made with MJ.”
Sounds like a good idea to me. Breathing-in any smoke at all can’t be good for us. Eating a nutbar sound like a healthier alternative.
Thge other interesting alternative are the new “smokeless” cigarettes. As far as I can see these should be utterly safe .. they are really compact vaporizers.
For some reason the government (http://www.groundreport.com/He.....g-Health-O )seems to be trying to close down on these, but they raise an interesting new idea … if we can sell inhalers for serious drugs, why not for recreational use too?
As an avoirdupois disadvantaged person, I also think such devices might be great for weight control. I understand they can even be bought with nicotine free cartridges. Put some THC is there and you would have a product that might rescue GM .
From today’s (well tomorrow here) Guardian in Britain!! I am sure that the great liberal press would have suppressed this story because it so caters to the conservatives; or the opposite of that, which ever you might find more real.