Deuteronomy 25:11-12
If two men fight together, and the wife of one draws near to rescue her husband from the hand of the one attacking him, and puts out her hand and seizes him by the genitals, then you shall cut off her hand; your eye shall not pity her.
Discuss.
The is probably some of the best porn that the Bible had to offer back in those days.
Diagramming this sentence leads to the intent that the wife is grabbing the testicles of “him,” her husband.
Thus, the implication was and is clear. Women ought not to castrate their husbands.
I gather this sort of thing was a big problem back in the day?
Did you mean bad grammer or did you mean a woman controlling their husband by grabbing by his balls?
Consider this, why else did I make the balls so sensitive?
“I gather this sort of thing was a big problem back in the day?”
The whole Torah has a thing about penises and knives. I’m surprised Kansas or Alabama hasn’t written this into their State statutes.
This stuff only applied to the Jews.
This is the best thing in the news in quite a while.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new.....-1.1616382
The GOP is cleaning up deceptive websites that looked like official websites of Democratic candidates and led some Democratic donors to give money to the Republican congressional campaign committee, according to CNN. The websites now make it clear donors are contributing to GOP candidates.
It’s unclear from the CNN story whether cybersquatting issues remain unresolved. The GOP has registered dozens of domain names of Democratic candidates, e.g. “Jonesforcongress.com”.