Leviticus 18:17
Do not have sexual relations with both a woman and her daughter. Do not have sexual relations with either her son’s daughter or her daughter’s daughter; they are her close relatives. That is wickedness.
for the goyem, the rules were … well, I never did get around to that.
So lets start!
Your genome is holy, do not corrupt it by intercourse with a sibling or the child of a sibling or the child of your parents siblings or of their parents siblings or of their parents siblings.
3
wharfratspews:
@God….but now that we’ve got reliable birth control it should be ok….right? How about a woman and her sister? Or like twins? Suppose they’re just a large selection of concubines? That’s all ok, right?
4
Petespews:
Since this is obviously addressed to men, I find it curious that there’s no mention of having sex with the sons. So that means God is not only OK with Teh Gay but prefers it, right?
5
Dan Robinsonspews:
I think it is interesting that a prohibition needed to be stated. Like having laws against bestiality. The laws are there because people were behaving badly.
6
Michaelspews:
I heard that Martha Stewart banged her daughter’s boyfriend. Under these rules that seems to be OK for Martha, but not the boyfriend. Talk about double standards!
7
Godspews:
wharfrat
What I wrote is what is My law.
What YOU humans do within that law is up to you.
I have no concerns about sex toys or sex acts done that can not create a new life.
If you want to be a concubine and the pay is OK (NO slavery) my only caveat would be that any productive sex follow the rule above.
That said, once life is created I do have laws. Here is one:
Development of children requires mail; and female role models in some form of stable family. …I.e. my law would discourage homosexual parenting unless the relationship includes persons of both genders … e.g in a harem, a child should be raised in a manner that includes males and females.
8
Godspews:
wharfrat
What I wrote is what is My law.
What YOU humans do within that law is up to you.
I have no concerns about sex toys or sex acts done that can not create a new life.
If you want to be a concubine and the pay is OK (NO slavery) my only caveat would be that any productive sex follow the rule above.
That said, once life is created I do have laws. Here is one:
Development of children requires mail; and female role models in some form of stable family. …I.e. my law would discourage homosexual parenting unless the relationship includes persons of both genders … e.g in a harem, a child should be raised in a manner that includes males and females.
Mississippi wouldn’t exist if that were the case.
So, these were My instructions for the Jews.
for the goyem, the rules were … well, I never did get around to that.
So lets start!
Your genome is holy, do not corrupt it by intercourse with a sibling or the child of a sibling or the child of your parents siblings or of their parents siblings or of their parents siblings.
@God….but now that we’ve got reliable birth control it should be ok….right? How about a woman and her sister? Or like twins? Suppose they’re just a large selection of concubines? That’s all ok, right?
Since this is obviously addressed to men, I find it curious that there’s no mention of having sex with the sons. So that means God is not only OK with Teh Gay but prefers it, right?
I think it is interesting that a prohibition needed to be stated. Like having laws against bestiality. The laws are there because people were behaving badly.
I heard that Martha Stewart banged her daughter’s boyfriend. Under these rules that seems to be OK for Martha, but not the boyfriend. Talk about double standards!
wharfrat
What I wrote is what is My law.
What YOU humans do within that law is up to you.
I have no concerns about sex toys or sex acts done that can not create a new life.
If you want to be a concubine and the pay is OK (NO slavery) my only caveat would be that any productive sex follow the rule above.
That said, once life is created I do have laws. Here is one:
Development of children requires mail; and female role models in some form of stable family. …I.e. my law would discourage homosexual parenting unless the relationship includes persons of both genders … e.g in a harem, a child should be raised in a manner that includes males and females.
wharfrat
What I wrote is what is My law.
What YOU humans do within that law is up to you.
I have no concerns about sex toys or sex acts done that can not create a new life.
If you want to be a concubine and the pay is OK (NO slavery) my only caveat would be that any productive sex follow the rule above.
That said, once life is created I do have laws. Here is one:
Development of children requires mail; and female role models in some form of stable family. …I.e. my law would discourage homosexual parenting unless the relationship includes persons of both genders … e.g in a harem, a child should be raised in a manner that includes males and females.