Tomorrow is the end of the fundraising quarter and Darcy Burner is still $30,000 short of her goal. What with the huge amounts of cash President Bush has already pumped into Dave Reichert’s campaign, Burner’s ability to raise money becomes more important than ever, and big donors will be watching closely to see if she continues to build momentum.
No longer able to promote himself by abusing his congressional franking privileges, Reichert is no doubt preparing to hit the airwaves with his first round of advertising. How well Burner will be able to weather the inevitable attacks partially depends on how much she can spend in response.
So if you haven’t already given to Burner, or you plan to give more, now would be a great time to open your wallet. Please contribute directly via Burner’s website, or through my Act Blue page.
And if you do go to my Act Blue page you will notice that I have added a second candidate, 5th Congressional District Democratic challenger Peter Goldmark. I’m pretty damn stingy with my call to actions, but Goldmark is the real deal, and with a big enough Democratic wave he really does stand a chance of winning if he can afford to get his name, face and message out in front of voters.
So please give generously to Burner and Goldmark. And give now.
Why don’t you ask the 848 jailed felons (who were registered voters) for a few bucks? They probably voted for Fraudoire and might spend a few bucks on another chance to steal an election. This time for Darcy Burned-out.
She hasn’t a chance.
Unobservant @2,
Um… yeah… I guess that’s why President Bush flew all the way out here to raise half a million bucks for Reichert… because his opponent doesn’t have a chance.
She hasn’t a chance.
Commentby Observer— 6/29/06@ 1:18 pm
+++
But it IS King County, and that’s the bluest county in the state!
Well, Goldy, certainly Burner can win, but you and her need to read (and follow) Joel Connelly’s advice:
“If Burner is to stand a chance of upsetting freshman Republican Rep. Dave Reichert, however, Capitol Hill and Belltown need to be officially designated as Darcy-free zones.
The voters she’s courting live elsewhere, and are more than a bit different in their worldview….
As an act of self-reassurance, local right-wing blog sites last week went on a Darcy-can’t-win bender. They’re off base. So, too, are the Burner backers who claim to have the hottest challenger in the country. The 8th District was not found on The Washington Post’s most recent list of 20 House seats most likely to change hands in November.”
I just gave $50 – nothing like the special interest money RubberStampReichert banks from illegal lobbying but it’s a start.
Kieth is really coming into his own. He bitch-slapped pervert Bill O Really last night with good old facts…
Telling viewers that Bill O’Reilly misrepresented viewer statistics, Keith Olbermann, anchor of Coundown with Keith Oberman on MSNBC, explained that his audience has grown 37% while The O’Reilly Factor’s has dropped 20% in the same period.
“Fox’s ratings are lower than they were five years ago. Bill-Oh, 267,000 of your nightly viewers have vanished since last June. Call Fox Security, they are missing,” Olbermann said.
Olbermann also speaks of dropping viewer numbers of other Fox shows, “All eleven of Fox’s regular shows rating are down, four of them are down by 15 percent or more,” noted Oberman.
Republican Train Wreck #958493726
Rep. Bob Ney’s (R-OH) legislative director is already out the door, and his chief of staff and communications director are on the way out.
And that’s not all. One of Ney’s aides in Ohio was recently subpoenaed to testify before a federal grand jury, and “Additional subpoenas of Ney’s staffers are expected soon.”
Brian Walsh, Ney’s battle-tested flack (thanks for the memories!), apparently hasn’t had enough of the Abramoff scandal. He’s leaving Ney to be the spokesman for Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), who’s come up repeatedly because of his role in shutting down the casino of the Tigua tribe in West Texas when he was Attorney General there. Ralph Reed, working for Abramoff, was very active in pushing along Cornyn’s crusade, something Cornyn has claimed to know nothing about. Oh, but there are emails.
John425 said:
“Why don’t you ask the 848 jailed felons (who were registered voters) for a few bucks? They probably voted for Fraudoire…”
The Republicans chose the county and the judge where the challenge to the 2004 election was conducted. The judge was a Republican. Among the claims brought by the Republicans was that felons were illegally allowed to vote. It turned out that not that many convicted felons who hadn’t had their rights restored had actually voted, and for those for which it could be determined, most of them voted for Rossi, the Republican candidate.
The allegation that most felons who vote illegally vote for Democrats is a proven lie.
So Reichs Marshal Olbermann’s rating are up 37% But…so what?-in actual numbers, his audience grew from 10 viewers to almost 14-
RE: Post # 9 by rhp603: And you were able to ascertain their actual vote-how?- by the usual “Dean Logan insider trick” no doubt.
Interesting…goldy is promoting another goldy!
WHITE HOUSE EXPLAINS ITS CUT-AND-RUN PLAN …
Press secretary Tony Snow explains why the Democratic withdrawal plan is reckless and irresponsible, but General Casey’s isn’t:
“Well, actually, he has one, and it — you know, again, this is not, I believe the way, at least it was reported, is you’ve got two brigades by the end of the year, September being short of the end of the year. But I may be misreading it. In any event, you’ve got to keep in mind that this is not a statement of policy. Again, Gen. Casey keeps in mind a number of scenarios. You’re talking about scenarios here … And so I would caution very strongly against everybody thinking, well, they’re going to pull two brigades out. Maybe they will, maybe they won’t. That really does depend upon a whole series of things that we cannot, at this juncture, predict. But Gen. Casey — again, I would characterize this more in terms of scenario building, and we’ll see how it proceeds.”
That clears it up, right?
1
“They probably voted for Fraudoire” Commentby John425— 6/29/06@ 1:17 pm
All of the ones we know about voted for Rossi — all of them. You fucks just can’t let go, can you? Your guy lost. If you can’t move on, get counseling.
Funny but the New York Times in an article last week on the 12 or so hottest Congressional races in the country highlighted only 2 and one of those was the Darcy Burner / Dave Reichert race. So Republicans who have nothing else to do but troll Democrat/progressive/liberal/centrist blogs can say anything they want, its not going to change the reality that the race is a hot one and Reichert has little going for him or he woundn’t have called in George Bush to do his fundraising for him. Seems he couldn’t do it himself, without someone telling him what he should do, just like they tell how to vote to be one of the good old boys.
Note to self,
If I ever become W.H. Press Secretary, NO DRINKING BEFORE PRESS BRIEFING – even if it’s only the gaggle.
ATJ
11
“RE: Post # 9 by rhp603: And you were able to ascertain their actual vote-how?- by the usual ‘Dean Logan insider trick’ no doubt.” Commentby John425— 6/29/06@ 2:27 pm
Perhaps you’d enlighten us about how YOU ascertained their actual vote? Are you ready to admit you’re blowing smoke out of your ass?
16
Careful now. The WH press secretary is SUPPOSED to obfuscate — that’s his job. The idea is to use as many words (preferably big ones) as possible to say as little as possible. But most important of all, don’t say anything that might get your boss indicted.
soooo… if darcy the sacrificial donkette gets the 30k for “airwave” ads…. what the heck is she going to say???
dear darcy the sacrificial donkette, you actully have to stand for something, have an idea AND a plan to implement said idea, bubbe… hit and run one line platitude spouting may give your seattle leftys much needed orgasms, but pinball politics ain’t gonna work with the thinking voters IN OUR DAMNED DISTRICT.
I’m really, really looking forward to Gregoire stomping Ro$$i in 2008. Gregoire will have a strong record to run on, while Ro$$i will be a whine in the background, like a house fly.
19
“the thinking voters IN OUR DAMNED DISTRICT.” Commentby howcanyoubePROUDtobeanASS— 6/29/06@ 2:50 pm
The 8th District may or may not have thinking voters, but you’re certainly not one of them.
ROGER RABBIT POLL
Now that Bush has recieved $500K for him, how beholden will Rubberstamp Reichert be to the party hierarchy?
[ ] 1. Mr. President, should I kiss your right shoe or your left shoe, or both shoes?
[ ] 2. Briefing papers? I don’t need briefing papers! Just tell me how to vote.
[ ] 3. When does my name come up in the roll call? I forgot which state I’m from.
[ ] 4. Just a minute while I call Karl Rove to find out how I’m going to vote on this.
[ ] 5. No, I don’t know what my constituents think of this bill, but what’s that got to do with anything?
22
Now that Bush has raised $500K for him …
To John 425:
Just to be sure I had it right, I looked it up. Couldn’t find the actual decision quickly, but I found the news articles which reported it. The judge found 1,678 illegal votes (statewide) among the 2.8 million votes cast, an error rate of about a half of a percent. Again, let me emphasis – this was STATEWIDE, not just King County. It seems that all the counties had about the same percentage of their vote totals coming from an illegal vote, including the Republican counties.
Only five illegal voters were identified and who had testified under oath about who they voted for: Four of those voted for Rossi, and one voted for Bennett. None voted for Gregoire.
What about the others illegal votes? The Republicans failed to produce ANY evidence of felons who voted for Gregoire. Considering the effort that went into this challenge, I doubt that was because they couldn’t find at least some of them, or because they couldn’t get at least a few of them to talk. The only reason they wouldn’t have introduced this evidence is if the results went against them. Instead, the Republicans tried to have the judge use “proportional analysis” to have the judge ASSUME that most illegal votes would have gone to Gregoire. Judge Bridges rejected this approach as an appeal to “judicial activisim”.
So, there you have it. Despite a considerable amount of money, time, and effort, the only evidence of illegal votes which could be tracked to a specific candidate waw four votes for Rossi, and none for Gregoire.
So claiming that felons vote for Gregoire, or any other Democrat, was proven to be a lie.
Source for my last post:
Judge dissects Republican claims one by one in ruling against suit Seattle Times, June 7, 2006.
Oops, date should read should be June 7, 2005.
And why are we still having to deal with these nuts that repeat these lies after having been rebuffed by even a Republican judge? I wasn’t that ardent a partison before the 2004 election challenge, but the obvious false claims, media manipulation, and slander from the Republicans on this issue pushed me firmly into the anti-Republican camp.
And why are we still having to deal with these nuts that repeat these lies after having been rebuffed by even a Republican judge? I wasn’t that ardent a partison before the 2004 election challenge, but the obvious false claims, media manipulation, and slander from the Republicans on this issue pushed me firmly into the anti-Republican camp.
Atrios calls them “Zombie Lies”. We keep killing them, and they keep coming back, trying to eat our brains.
http://atrios.blogspot.com/200.....6099127750
Darcy only needs one message. America is headed in the wrong direction under Bush and the republicans. Dave Reichert is nothing but a rubber stamp for the Bush plan. If you want a new direction, vote for Darcy. If you’re happy with thousands of dead in Iraq, a White House that has outed covert agents for political gain, the highest budget deficit in history, the largest trade deficit in history, the most corrupt administration since Nixon, the highest gas prices in history, run away inflation, the loss of jobs to overseas workers, and a devisive congress that would rather play politics than govern, vote for RubberStampReichert.
More corrupt republicans. Can’t these assholes find one fucker that isn’t crooked?
Former Alabama Gov Convicted on Bribery Charges
By Paul Kiel – June 29, 2006, 5:39 PM
It’s a bad year for former governors. First George Ryan (R) gets convicted in Illinois, and now Alabama’s onetime guv Don Siegelman (D) is heading for the pokey.
From the AP:
Former Gov. Don Siegelman and former Health South CEO Richard Scrushy were convicted Thursday in a bribery scheme that derailed Siegelman’s campaign to retake his former office.
Siegelman, 60, was accused of trading government favors for campaign donations when he was governor from 1999 to 2003 and lieutenant governor from 1995 to 1999.
Scrushy was accused of arranging $500,000 in donations to Siegelman’s campaign for a state lottery in exchange for a seat on a state hospital regulatory board….
Prosecutors claimed Siegelman and his chief of staff, Paul Hamrick, received gifts, including a Honda motorcycle for the governor that he allegedly tried to conceal from investigators. Hamrick reportedly received $25,000 for a new luxury BMW automobile.
RE: post 25- Republican staff lawyers aren’t as knowledgeable in criminal procedure as the Democrat lawyers are- so they presented their case poorly.
Where is it stated that Judge Bridges is Republican? Because he lives in a Republican county? He lives in a Royal Blue State that votes Democratic…………
24
“Couldn’t find the actual decision quickly”
Superior court decisions aren’t published. However, the Secretary of State does have some of the 2004 election contest lawsuit documents posted on its web site at http://www.secstate.wa.gov/elections/recount.aspx . As of this moment, the link to Judge’s Bridge’s oral ruling doesn’t work.
32
Mac — in Washington, judicial elections are technically non-partisan. However, given that Chelan County votes 2-to-1 Republican, you can rest assured that no Democrats are decorating the bench there.
LT @ 30: “More corrupt republicans. Can’t these assholes find one fucker that isn’t crooked?
Former Alabama Gov Convicted on Bribery Charges”
LT, do you even read before launching your anti-right screeds? Go re-read your own article and see where the flaw in your argument is. Here is a little help….
“and now Alabama’s onetime guv Don Siegelman (D)“
and some more help from Wikipedia…
51st Governor of Alabama
Term of office: January, 1999 – January, 2003
Predecessor: Fob James
Successor: Bob Riley
Born: February 24, 1946
Mobile, Mobile
Political party: Democratic
Profession: Lawyer
The Rabbit does a much better job at anti-right posts. Go learn from him.
31
Your basic premise is correct — Republican lawyers are dumber than rocks. The GOP’s defense lawyers are no good; look at all the Republicans in jail or under indictment! Rossi’s lawyers were no good; they got stomped in Wenatchee. Bush’s lawyers are no good; they just lost a huge Supreme Court case.
So please give generously to Burner and Goldmark. And give now.
As Jerry Lewis used to say, give till it hurts.
Besides, LT, I don’t want to cross the Rabbit in his Easter Bunny persona…
35
“The Rabbit does a much better job at anti-right posts. Go learn from him.” Commentby Kyle Broflovski— 6/29/06@ 3:45 pm
Gee thanks, Kyle! I try. Now let’s see if I can rehabilitate LeftTurn’s reputation. LT’s premise is that Siegelman is part of the GOP Culture of Corruption. Siegelman is a Democrat in name only. Siegelman is a Yellow Dog Democrat from a state that votes Republican. For example, in 2004, Bush got 67% of the vote in Alabama, GOP Sen. Richard Shelby got 68%, and Republicans won most of Alabama’s House seats (racking up between 62% and 75% of the votes). So who elected this crook Siegelman? REPUBLICAN voters, that’s who! There sure as hell aren’t enough Democrats in Alabama to elect him. So, one has to ask — as LeftTurn did — what were those REPUBLICAN voters thinking when they elected this crook as their governor?
So, you see, LeftTurn was right after all. It’s all in how you interpret things.
38
You are very wise. Crossing me is a bad idea, but picking me up by my ears is an even worse idea: http://video.google.com/videop.....4898988918
This is a no-no! Notice how close this idiot’s belly is to my powerful hind feet with their razor-sharp claws …
http://www.nald.ca/ssrc/newsle.....gician.gif
@35 What Roger Said!
Just wanted to remind you righties that your LimpDick hero LimpDickLimbaugh is in REAL trouble again. In addition to peeing into a cup every day in front of a probation officer, he now has to explain his illegal transport of the weenie wagger drug. You all must be so very proud!
Talking about “voter fraud” in our 2004 Gubernatorial Election, that idiot Dori Moron was today spouting off about voter fraud in King County.
You know, he sounds intelligent, but when it comes down to it, he’s just a weenei whiner looking for something to whine his weenie about.
Coming soon: “The Chronicles of LimpDick” starring Rush Limbaugh as a flacid champion of right wing wackos everywhere
Roger @ 39: Then explain about a good ‘blue’ state like Illinois voting for George Ryan?
Also, I may be breaking my rule, but…
You @ 36:
Also please explain how Kerry and his 10,000 lawyers got hookwinked if you accept the conclusions of the recent Rolling Stone article about the 2004 election? Seems to be either a. no massive fraud actually took place or b. they were incompetent boobs for not seeing such massive fraud. Your thoughts?
Kyle Broflovski @ 46
“Also please explain how Kerry and his 10,000 lawyers got hookwinked if you accept the conclusions of the recent Rolling Stone article about the 2004 election?”
10,000 lawyers, eh?
Oh, brother…the wingnut fucks don’t even pick their lies to sound plausable any more.
Kyle Broflovski @ 46
Not that I was calling you a liar, Kyle.
But…certainly naive!
What about Richard Wright? Why is he consistently NOT mentioned by anyone, has very little support from the powers-that-be? I don’t understand…well, maybe I do. He isn’t a sweet young microsoft ex-exec thing and he doesn’t wear a fucking cowboy hat. Not glam. But he’s a good guy and HE’S PUTTING HIS ALL INTO RUNNING AGAINST FUCKING “DOC” DO-NOTHING 100% DELAY/BUSH HASTINGS. Please send bucks to Richard Wright.
Darcy only needs one message. America is headed in the wrong direction under Bush and the republicans. Dave Reichert is nothing but a rubber stamp for the Bush plan. If you want a new direction, vote for Darcy. If you’re happy with thousands of dead in Iraq, a White House that has outed covert agents for political gain, the highest budget deficit in history, the largest trade deficit in history, the most corrupt administration since Nixon, the highest gas prices in history, run away inflation, the loss of jobs to overseas workers, and a devisive congress that would rather play politics than govern, vote for RubberStampReichert. -Commentby LeftTurn— 6/29/06@ 3:28 pm
Congratulations noleftbrainandmissinghisLeftnit… you passed platitudes with flying colors!
Now what the hell does it mean?
What the hell will the sacrificial nitwit do for the 8th?
Why the hell should I vote for a lightweight nobody who can’t wait to abandon her child in search of ego-strokes?
46
“Roger @ 39: Then explain about a good ‘blue’ state like Illinois voting for George Ryan?”
Three words. Diebold voting machines.
46
“You @ 36: Also please explain how Kerry and his 10,000 lawyers got hookwinked if you accept the conclusions of the recent Rolling Stone article about the 2004 election? Seems to be either a. no massive fraud actually took place or b. they were incompetent boobs for not seeing such massive fraud. Your thoughts?” Commentby Kyle Broflovski— 6/29/06@ 5:16 pm
Hoodwinked? We weren’t hoodwinked. We knew what happened, but couldn’t stop it. A number of lawsuits were filed by various groups in Ohio, but that’s not how you get a presidential election thrown out.
There’s only one way to challenge a presidential election, and that’s in Congress. And when the “winning” candidate’s party controls Congress, you’re not going to get hearings, there won’t be investigations, the House won’t reject a state’s slate of electoral voters no matter how crooked the election was.
The solution is to elect a Democratic House this fall. Then it will all come out. There will be subpoenaes, investigations, congressional hearings.
dj @ 47 & 48: “Oh, brother…the wingnut fucks don’t even pick their lies to sound plausable any more.”
Ahem….I would direct you to this story:
“The Democratic National Committee will have 10,000 lawyers in battleground states Election Day, with six “SWAT squads” ready to deploy on orders from nominee John Kerry.”
47
Actually, 10,000 lawyers may be on the low side. Just in Washington, the Kerry-Edwards campaign fielded 700 lawyers on election day. About 550 of these were deployed to polling places, and the rest were stationed at call centers or stood by in court houses.
All of these lawyers received training in federal and state election laws, and what problems to look for. Those stationed at polling places had cell phones and the call center phone numbers. This system made it possible to get an injunction within minutes if the observers saw voters’ rights being violated. The mere presence of these lawyers was a substantial deterrent.
Ohio certainly was on the Democrats’ radar screen. In the weeks before the election, there was lots of discussion about going to Ohio, and those who could afford to go went, because it was widely expected within the Kerry campaign that there would be serious problems there. A couple people I talked to who were in Ohio on election day said the situation there was “unbelievable.”
But the difficulty in Ohio was, first, the Democratic Party is weak and disorganized there. In many cases, there was no local organization to work with. Second, Ohio’s laws are much weaker than Washington’s in terms of protecting voter rights. For example, in Washington only election officials can challenge a voter at a polling place on election day, but Ohio’s laws allowed the Republicans to make mass challenges at polls. Even though essentially 100% of these challenges were bogus, it created lengthy delays at the sign-in tables, and this was a major reason for the long lines in Democratic precincts. Even where lawyer-observers were on hand and observed these tactics, there was little or nothing they could do to stop it, because Ohio law allows the Republicans to use this tactic.
Roger @ 47: Thanks for the perspective. I was wondering what all those lawyers were doing besides spending other people’s money. :)
Let us never forget the millions of dollars and thousands of man-hours the GOP devotes to PREVENTING AMERICAN CITIZENS FROM VOTING IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY. This isn’t about stopping “fraud” as Republican claim — it’s about suppressing Democratic voters in order to put people in public offices whom the majority of voters don’t want. It’s about the minority ruling the majority by interfering with the right to vote. What is especially ugly about this is that the GOP goes out of its way to target minorities, especially blacks — there is a very pungent racist order to these tactics. We should be angry — very angry — at the people doing this to our fellow citizens. But we can’t take the law into our own hands, so we must find effective means to combat these vicious, anti-American, thug tactics.
One of the things we need to do is replace Norm Maleng as King County prosecutor. It’s time to find a credible Democrat to run against him. We need a prosecutor who will put thugs like Lori Sotelo behind bars, where they belong.
55
How were they spending other people’s money? Explain please.
55 (continued)
All of the lawyers in the Kerry-Edwards VPP (Voter Protection Project) were volunteers who weren’t paid for their time or work, and who paid their own expenses. Their presence in polling places didn’t cost the taxpayers anything — how would it? The training materials were paid for by Kerry-Edwards campaign. Several law firms donated the use of conference rooms and trainers. There was no expense to the public as a result of this program.
Roger @ 58: A little lawyer joke. Were all those lawyers there pro bono?
me @ 60: You answered my question, thanks.
31,
““Republican staff lawyers aren’t as knowledgeable in criminal procedure”
They why’d you make one of them your state party chair? I know it’s not because of her looks. Are you saying she should stay out of the deep end and stick to helping Rethugs evade taxes?
RR@56 Never lose sight of the fact that their little tin-god, Ronnie Bonzo-Raygun announced for the presidency on the courthouse steps in Philadelphia, Mississippi.
Kyle Broflovski,
““The Democratic National Committee will have 10,000 lawyers in battleground states Election Day, with six “SWAT squads” ready to deploy on orders from nominee John Kerry.””
Sorry, dipshit, I guess I have to spell this out to you bit by bit. The Kennedy piece was about Ohio—one of many battleground states. So, what part of “battleground states on Election Day” don’t you understand?
dj @ 64: Let’s review….
me: “Also please explain how Kerry and his 10,000 lawyers…”
you: “10,000 lawyers, eh? Oh, brother…the wingnut fucks don’t even pick their lies to sound plausable any more.”
me: Article: “The Democratic National Committee will have 10,000 lawyers in battleground states Election Day”
Also Roger: “Actually, 10,000 lawyers may be on the low side.”
you: “The Kennedy piece was about Ohio…So, what part of “battleground states on Election Day” don’t you understand?”
Huh? First, you call me a liar or naive for getting the 10,000 lawyer figure, then you’re calling me a dipshit for calling you on it? Where did I say that Kerry had 10,000 lawyers just in Ohio? I said “He had 10,000 lawyers”. The article points out other nationwide issues in the first two paragraphs. Who needs to have this spelled out exactly? Or do you want to argue with Roger, too?
Puddy where are you on LeftTurd and drinking pee? That’s okay I’ll do it this time Puddy:
“Just wanted to remind you righties that your LimpDick hero LimpDickLimbaugh is in REAL trouble again (per my sick little mind). In addition to peeing into a cup every day in front of a probation officer (I made this up because it is NOT in the Palm Beach Order), he now has to explain his illegal (?) transport of the weenie wagger drug (that is not on the illegal list). You all must be so very proud, because I, LeftTurd, will be drinking from the piss cup of my hero Rush Limbaugh!”
See BS: Sorry went to the Everett Aquasox game last night. I like Comment #66. So true of LeftTurd. Again he was washed away by toilet water last night. Amazing how he continues to rise up out of the sewage!
Puddybutt, your wife was especially good last night. She told me that LimpDickLimbaugh was bringing those little blue pills home for you. Too bad they didn’t get there in time.
Oh yes, and your sister says hi too!
RE: Post 30– Democrats and their Culture of Corruption.
Goto: http://www.noagenda.org– for a list of over 70 DemocRats under ethics clouds.
Kyle @ 65
“Huh? First, you call me a liar or naive”
No…just naive—see 48
“for getting the 10,000 lawyer figure, then you’re calling me a dipshit for calling you on it? Where did I say that Kerry had 10,000 lawyers just in Ohio? I said “He had 10,000 lawyers”.”
You said:
“Also please explain how Kerry and his 10,000 lawyers got hookwinked if you accept the conclusions of the recent Rolling Stone article about the 2004 election?”
Because Kerry did not have 10,000 lawyers, you dope. Yes, there was a network of lawyers acting as Democratic observers across the nation, but it is disingenious to imply that somehow Kerry had a team of 10,000 lawyers working on the 0hio case (i.e. trying to uncover the Ohio debacle ).
Burner has ummm…”flamed out” and Reichert was endorsed by the 6,900 member Washington State Council of Firefighters and the WA State Council of Police & Sheriffs. As first-responders, they realize Reichert is the “real deal” and Burner is just a dillettante.
Sorry J425,
So claiming that felons vote for Gregoire, or any other Democrat, was proven to be a lie.
This is Historically incorrect. I do believe that Joseph P. Kennedy spent a ton of money in Chicago (especially Cook County).
And another ton in the Virginia’s.
There are many more. But let me be fair, both sides do it. It just that the Democrats made an Art out of it ( remember Boss Tweed?)
Vote Your Conscience Not your Emotions. (Just because they put up two candidates doesn’t mean that you have to vote for one of them).
The 5th district is NOT going to vote socialist. Get real