She should definitely call Zig immediately.
Imagine, if you will, forcing sending your entire office to see hot motivational babe Sarah Palin live at an arena near you for only $19.95. If your employees little worker scumbags won’t go they can spend the day counting toner cartridges.
Today’s Republican Party is a multi-level marketing scheme that sells faux resentment instead of generic cleaning products. Neither the particular product nor the particular resentment are of any great importance, if each fulfills the desired political objective of fostering yet another wave of profits in the form of anger and donations from the base.
It slices, it dices and it cuts this tomato paper thin, and if you order now you can can look at her legs.
Don’t delay!
keep on with the insults , jewboy
Heh, typical “conservative”.
No imagination or original thought. And that particular slur is really at the root of conservatism in general isn’t it?
If it worked for Giuliani…
I’ve been listening, and it seems much less that the left has an irrational hatred of SP and much, MUCH more that the right has an irrational love for her.
Jesse Jackson called NYC HymieTown.
#4. It seems that if anyone points out any thing inconsistent or hypocritical that palin has done, it’s taken that they hate palin.
The left has what Diddled Luvr@4?
Why not do a search on negative Sarah Palin stories vs positive ones?
What crackas you been eating along with that kook-aid?
And Blew John@6 you fergit anytime someone attacked “the messiah” they were called racists.
Gee Jon, you sound like one of those little angry, bitter, ugly, zit-faced geeks that stood alone without a date at all those school dances. Poor little man.
Yeah, liberal folks hated Sarah. Not because she represented any real threat to us, but because she represented everything that has been wrong about the United States since the end of WW2. Extreme vanity, narcissism, superficiality to such an extreme that her new shoes would be a more welcome subject to her, than any real deep discourse on public policy or relationships with foreign nations, at any gathering she would be interested in attending.
She was a flaming twit. She had no deep or original thoughts, her entire personality is shallow and incapable of any real passion about anything but her hairstyle or what she would be wearing to the next political rally.
The fear amongst the liberal folks such as myself was that an uneducated, selfish reactionary airhead would end up as President. We had seen enough of that in Reagan and Bush. This nation needs intelligent public servants, not petty dipshit types as represented by McCaine and Palin.
McCaine chose her, not because she was intelligent, but specifically because she was extremely UNintelligent. He chose her because she had “nice gams”, and for no other reason than he thought she would look good on camera. Thats how Reagan got elected. He smiled a lot. He made interesting anecdotes on TV. He told mildly amusing little white people jokes. His actual knowlege of really important things was nearly completely nil. His purpose was to make nice for the cameras on the front porch while the hogs emptied the root cellar in the back.
Sarah Palin was supposed to be another such dimwit. Liberals, and in actuality, most people saw that superficiality and decided that the previous eight years were enough of that. The U.S. needs intelligent and educated people in government, not Sarah Palin or John McCaine.
@7 Why should there be any positive stories on Palin? The woman is an ignoramus. She’s a liar. She’s a crook. She’s a TV-camera-hugging and attention-loving megalomaniac. In other words, she’s a perfect fit for the Republican Party. And she (and her entire family) are great tabloid copy. But take her seriously as a candidate for high office? That’s a joke, right?
#7, you are seeing the world through your lens.
There are more negative stories of palin, because she is so inconsistent and hypocritical.
I am critical of Obama for his way of handling Don’t ask Don’t tell, and Single Payer Health plans now, when he held different positions during the campaign.
Who is calling Tom Hartman and Ed Shutlz racist because they are criticizing Obama? Anyone? Anyone? Nope.
puddy, you are sounding like manoftruth.
when manoftruth says vile racist things, I shriek that someone else said a vile thing some other time 25 years ago!!!
and what’s more: we know you are but what am I?
and this: your mother wears army boots!!!!
Neener neener neener!!!
[runs away laughing, to pull down girls’ pants and see their underwear; then cries when mommy makes him go home to do homework.]
@11 Poor puddinghead can’t help it. When they handed out brains, puddy got the oatmeal.
@13, Since I’m commenting on name calling and personal insults. Roger, you are not helping!
If every post by the conservatives are vicious name calling and incoherent racist ranting and all the progressives are attacking the ideas, not the person, we will be better than them. They won’t notice or care, but we will.
Maybe it’s better we should go out and try to do something for the less fortunate. Even in SE Asia where I’m going. You get away from these vapid self-indulgent jerks who defend their greed by falling back on “conservative ideals” and come here to hiss at the rest of us.
Be better than them beyond doubt, do for someone else.
They sure as hell never will.
And you’ll be too distracted to care about the losers.
9 Gimme a break…McCain didn’t Choose Palin–she was imposed on him by a GOP leadership who thought he was “too moderate” and wouldn’t be able to “play to the base”. They believed that the American body politic was actually craving another massive dose of the medicine that made us sick, and were oblivious to the fact that the wheels were already coming off the bubble economy based on imprudent credit and indenture of the average citizen.
Well, it didn’t work. Joe Six-Pack America(tm) was already behind in his mortgage payments and had no idea how to pay for his wife’s mastectomy or Gramma’s Alzheimer’s care, to say nothing about sending Junior to college. And why the hell was Cousin Fred going back to I-Rack for the fourth time? Palin and the neocons who got her nominated thought they could still sell 9/11 and the myth that they were defending the America of Horatio Alger where anyone could become a millionaire, while to most of the rest of us it had become a sick joke.
Had McCain been allowed to be his own man, run on his own terms, and elucidate his own vision of what America should be (which was no doubt far different from the way we were going), he might well be in the Oval Office right now, and the Republican Party might have had a chance for continued relevance.
I read the first sentence as she should definitely deploy all Zig. Then I added For Great Justice, just because.
Let’s wait and see how things turn out for any Rebuplicans Palin tries to “help” in the future. Perhaps Susan Hutchison will be one of the first.
18 – Oh god, let it be so….
The two most likely possibilities seem to me to be:
– Sarah Palin voluntarily and irreponsibly abandoned the people of the State of Alaska who elected her for her own selfish reasons.
– Sarah Palin is about to be indicted, and resigned either as part of a deal with prosecutors or to get out ahead of the news.
Either way, she has just thrown away her only potential claim to the slightest bit of executive competence, and is effectively out of the 2012 running.
“Alaska political circles buzzing: an alleged scandal centered around a building contractor, Spenard Building Supplies (SBS), with close ties to Palin and her husband, Todd. Many political observers in Alaska are fixated on rumors that federal investigators have been seizing paperwork from SBS in recent months, searching for evidence that Palin and her husband Todd steered lucrative contracts to the well-connected company in exchange for gifts like the construction of their home on pristine Lake Lucille in 2002. The home was built just two months before Palin began campaigning for governor, a job which would have provided her enhanced power to grant building contracts in the wide open state. SBS has close ties to the Palins. The company has not only sponsored Todd Palin’s snowmobile team, according to the Village Voice’s Wayne Barrett, it hired Sarah Palin to do a statewide television commercial in 2004. Though Todd Palin told Fox News he built his Lake Lucille home with the help of a few “buddies,” according to Barrett’s report, public records revealed that SBS supplied the materials for the house.”
Quotes From: The Daily Beast:
Doesn’t this sound like the REAL REASON Pale is resigning?
@18: LOL. Maybe we could gather donations to help fly Palin in for that event!
21 – Very interesting find.
Needs a link:
http://bit.ly/Mofyb
We’ll see how it plays out.
I’m sure Stupes will be here soon whining about “Moby”..
BTW, I hate to break it to the wingnuts, but the gun-totin’, red-and-white-bikini-wearin’ picture of Sarah P. is a fake.
I’m here to combat the newly found enthusiasm of a couple of our boys in here for telling us the Presidential Approval Index from RasmussenReports.com. According the Rasmussen’s site, “…the Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve.” Today it is at -2 (33% Strongly Approve and 35% Strongly Dispprove).
Mr. Cynical is fond of tellng us about it, at least on the days when it is negative. For example that he doesn’t tell us is that, as of today, overall, 53% of voters say they approve of the President’s performance so far, and 46% disapprove (index of +7). These are almost exactly his Election Day percentages and indicate that his support is quite remarkably stable.
Piper Scott tells us, even less usefully, that Sarah Palin’s “latest Pew poll” favorable v. unfavorable numbers are 45 percent favorable versus 44 percent unfavorable, and then he compares that to Rasmussen’s Presidential Approval Index. This is misleading in a number of ways.
– One is a poll of job approval ratings, and other is whether a person is looked upon favorably or not.
– The Rasmussen index is calculated only from thsoe people who indicated the strongest feelings on the matter. If you look in the Pew poll at Palin’s Very Favorable percentage (15%), versus her Very Unfavorable percentage (22%), you can see that HER index is -7. It’s still a meaningless comparison but one which for propaganda purposes does not sound as good, eh?
I don’t know what Sarah Palin’s job approval numbers are in Alaska, but I am guessing they’re pretty much in the toilet.
However, we CAN find out Obama’s favorable/unfavorable numbers, can’t we? In the same Pew poll that Piper cited for Palin, Obama’s Very Favorable percentage is 37% and his Very Unfavorable percentage is 11%, putting his index at +26. Now this number CAN be directly compared to Palin’s -7. In an honest comparison, Barack Obama blows Sarah Palin away. But honest people already knew this.
In addition, Obama’s overall numbers are Favorable 72% and Unfavorable 25%. Again, Barack Obama blows Sarah Palin’s Fav45%-Un44% away.
Hey, we all already know that these were lies and that Mr. Cynical and Piper Scott are the lying liars who tell them.
sources:
http://www.pollingreport.com/obama_fav.htm
http://www.pollingreport.com/p.htm
http://www.rasmussenreports.co.....cking_poll
That felt good. Why do Republicans lie like other people breathe? Heck, MORE OFTEN than other people breathe.
Deep Thought
Not everyone who wears glasses is smart.
@21/22 Corrupt Bastards’ Club, Crooked Bitches’ Adjunct.
@24, no…but there are plenty of fairly recent photos of her in running togs. No question the lady has all the right parts in all the right places–on the outside.
Happy 4th Jon. Yes, the wingnuts have discovered cash in their resentment. See “The Wrecking Crew” by Thomas Frank.
It’s always about the money with these guys….just like gangsters.
i wont even make a racial slur. your hypocritical treatment of sarah palin, when you have people in your party that have all the worst traits that you accuse her of, is sickening. you’ll always win in the courts and mostly the ballot box, because you figured out how to rig that and conservatives are too stupid/scared, to do anything about it. what you need to make sure you do however is keep the plates spinning until these last two generations die off. then you’ve won. if the plates crash however, and people cant feed and close their kids, i wouldnt want to be a liberal blogger.
What a tool. The libtard MSM wanted “the messiah”, so they did the bidding of the Dummocraptic party and went into overdrive to write the most nastiest things they could.
First off was why didn’t Sarah about the Down syndrome child Trigg.
Next was the accusations of Trigg was Bristol’s baby. It went downhill from there.
So if a fool like Pelletizer can’t figger out historical fact and his slobbering morons just drink his kook-aid, it tells much to Puddy about the HA libtardos here!
butpudder,
The “MSM” did not do the bidding of the Democratic Party. Palin brought it on herself.
The MSM didn’t question her decision to have Trigg (some bloggers did–but they are not the “MSM”).
The only person of note to pontificate on the allegation that Trigg was Bristol’s baby was Andrew Sullivan….a conservative.
You are both a liar and a fool. You’re the kind of moron who believes Vince Foster’s death was ordered by Hillary, and then you come on to a lefty blog and throw the usual resentment fueled wingnut monkey feces.
Pitiful.
@32
You’re the kind of moron who believes Vince Foster’s death was ordered by Hillary.
personally i would never believe that. the only conspiracy i believe is that bush/cheney started the iraq war for oil.
you have to be finicky about what conspiracies to believe.
Now that was P R I C E L E S S! We know how many libtardos claimed that don’t we?
ProudFoundHisBrainIsHisASS…
Of course you forget this post now removed from Daily Kook-aid. The rumor began on DailyKos. Of course no libtardo could explain this picture earlier in 2008 year.
Markos was so embarassed he removed it but here is what it said again:
Then this appeared…
And you are a stupid libtardo and a fool.
ProudFoundHisBrainIsHisASS…
It was previously published by Puddy that the Talking Point Memo also carried it.
Of course Pelletizer and his foolish crew forgot this on HuffPo. Butt then again they all have libtardo disease.
So typical of a liberal.
Blew John axked
You are trying to have Puddy acknowledge two libtardo MSM bottom feeders? Tom Hartman – Puleeeeeeeze. Ed Schultz, who’s show gets what? 100 viewers a night?
No Puddy is reminded of such luminaries such as Janeane Garofalo who on the ESPN Reject Keith Olbermann’s show called people who disagree with “the messiah” racists.
No Puddy is reminded of actress Angie Harmon who had to come out and say she wasn’t a racist for disagreeing with “the messiah”.
No Puddy is reminded of “the messiah” Chia earlier this year and the “racist” uproar.
No Puddy is reminded of “the messiah’s” own words last year before you all elevated him to his latest position as “the messiah”:
I am not sure what Pud means by linking to a HuffPo story about how the man who credited himself with leaking the “Sarah Palin doesn’t know that Africa is a conttinent” story basically invented himself and his credentials.
Somehow I am thinking that Pud thinks that this invalidates the story itself. The story is true, as Palin’s later correction she issued made clear. There is also no question that she did not know who the parties to NAFTA are (US, Canada, Mexico).
I think once she is outside of Alaska she is pretty well lost.
The point of the HufPo post is only that they guy who credieted himself with leaking the story didn’t really exist. Someone else leaked it.
Palin Ponders Perilous Prospects
@ #30
Liberals tend to do well in constitutional court cases primarily because the US Constitution is a liberal document, that was written by liberal thinking men. Educated men.
The only real opposition to first and 14th amendment issues always come from the right wing anti-constitutional movement that has manifested itself since Reagan was “President”. We don’t have to rig the system, the principles are already there.
Your racist attitudes are wrong, period. It only reveal you for what you really are. That is, uncivilized and frankly, very stupid. Those attitudes are mostly held sacred by people who are either dangerously insane, or are too poorly educated to really have a legitimate opinion on grownup matters.
You have never seen a liberal open fire on a public school, or detonate a truck bomb in front of a day care center full of little kids or a womens health clinic. You’ve never seen a liberal burn down a church, or someones house, because they go to the wrong one. Self-professed “conservatives” do such things all the time. There are hundreds of examples, including 9/11.
We know what people like you really are. And yes,we believe in the second amendment.
Golly Daddy Love can be dense as spent uranium.
Let Puddy help you fool…
Butt there’s more for Diddled Luvr, the newest member of spent uranium
How many MSM libtardos ran with the “story” Diddled Luvr?
@42
You have never seen a liberal open fire on a public school, or detonate a truck bomb
ummmmmmmmmm…bill ayers??
#39.
Janeane Garofalo? You have to be kidding. She is on the fringe to real progressives as Free Republic is to real conservatives.
Funny how the only thing commented on by Blew John is Garofalo. All else was skipped. Nope Puddy not kidding.
Free Republic is fringe… you mean like Daily Kos, TPM, CAP, Media Matters, Countdown, MoveOn? Okay.
44 Pud
I said it clearly and I’ll say it again. Thee man was a fiction who falsely claimed credit for a true story about Sarah Palin’s ignorance of the world.
Sicko. Get some treatment, please. How can you live with yourself with all that inner hate. Yes, you ha.
Diddled Luvr, not the right answer…
Wow, hellova effort Diddled Luvr. The man helped plant the story of Sarah Palin not knowing about Africa…
Otherwise why would so many Libtardo MSM places have to retract it? So many mea culpas. Anything remotely making Palin look bad was good enuf for the libtardo MSM and their friends in the blogosphere!
Even the NY Times had to admit it was an elaborate hoax. Butt, that doesn’t set well with Diddled Luvr and his PDS!
Good try Diddled Luvr, good try.
Soooo what:
Palin is a complete idiot who did not know what the Bush doctrine was, could not name any newspapers she read and could not answer a simple question about health care or even announce her own resignation in coherent manner.
If the mindless wingnuts like Puddy want to boost her as Presidential material – it just shows how off-base those clueless idiots are….
Hey NutsTooTight@51: If you go back and review the thread, Puddy proved the libtardo MSM jumped at anything negative on Palin. This was just another of my proofs the libtardo MSM provided many more negative stories on Palin and some weren’t true.
Too bad you can’t fathom anything with your NutsTooTight!
Basically, some guy claimed to be the source for the NY times story (he lied) but Faux News claimed it’s own sources for the story and refused to retract it.
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2.....palin.html
Dear Moron Puddy,
Hello – It was Faux news that broke the story and refused to retract it.
Are you now saying Faux news is libtardo?
Wow, you are ever more out there and ever more strident in your defense of total CRAP!
The only thing you proved is that you can’t prove anything.
Bottom line:
Palin cut-n-run instead of staying in the fight.
And this moronic, lying, white trash bitch was “qualified” with her “executive experience” to be the Commander-in-Chief if McCain where to die or quit in office?
Republicans always create the best lessons in what NOT to do when in leadership roles.
Like cut-n-run or go “on the run” for 5 days out of the country without telling anyone while fucking your mistress and raping the sanctity of marriage vows.
@#45
Yep, dumber’n a sack of horseshoes.