As has been widely reported, Rep. Dave Reichert told a crowd at yesterday’s fundraiser that Vice President Dick Cheney offered to “campaign for your opponent if it’ll help.”
Well, Democratic challenger Darcy Burner has sent a letter to Cheney taking him up on his offer:
April 19, 2006
Office of the Vice President
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500Dear Mr. Vice President:
During your recent trip to Washington State to support White House endorsed candidates, you were quoted by both Seattle newspapers as telling 8th District Representative Dave Reichert that you would “campaign for your opponent if it’ll help.”
As Reichert’s Democratic opponent, I would like to take you up on your kind and thoughtful offer and I cordially invite you to come and spend a day campaigning with me in the 8th District. The district reaches from Microsoft’s Redmond Campus to Mount Rainier National Park and offers a microcosm of America. Here are some of the events I would like to plan for your visit to the 8th.
Let’s start at Mount Rainier where we can take in the beautiful and precious parklands and forests. Here you may be able to see clearly why our district so opposed the Republican plan
“In Kent, we could meet with some workers who have had their jobs exported oversees and you can explain why the Bush tax policy gives tax breaks to American companies who out source American jobs. They’d like to know why their own tax dollars are being used to help them become unemployed.”
IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME TAX POLICY WE HAD WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT!
“Then, perhaps, we could visit a senior center and you could try to explain to our elderly why your prescription drug benefit – supported by Mr. Reichert – is creating such confusion and chaos.”
HOW ABOUT BILL CLINTON’S PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFIT? IT WAS VERY EASY TO UNDERSTAND!
“Finally, we could stop at Bellevue Community College where I could easily assemble a group of students who can not understand why the Bush Administration and Mr. Reichert would propose and support making it harder for student to get college loans.”
BY REQUIRING STUDENTS TO PROVIDE PROOF OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP OR LEGAL IMMIGRANT STATUS IN ORDER TO GET STUDENT LOANS?
“Moving north from Mount Rainier, I would like to have you meet with some of our brave Iraq veterans and their families to learn first hand of the inadequate body and vehicle armor your Administration provided them.”
WHICH HAPPENS TO BE 100% MORE THAN WHAT BILL CLINTON PROVIDED THEM — NOTHING!
“Also, I am sure National Guard families and veterans will want to ask you why your Administration and Mr. Reichert opposed giving them the same health benefits as the regular military along whose side they have fought.”
IF THEY ARE MOBILIZED FOR ACTIVE DUTY, THEY GET THE SAME HEALTH BENEFITS AS ANY OTHER SOLDIER. AGAIN, EXACTLY THE SAME THING THEY GOT WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT.
“Let’s start at Mount Rainier where we can take in the beautiful and precious parklands and forests. Here you may be able to see clearly why our district so opposed the Republican plan – supported by Mr. Reichert – to make it easier for developers and private interests such as mining companies to take over and ruin these treasured public lands.”
WHICH HAPPEN TO BE THE EXACT SAME LAWS THAT WERE IN PLACE WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT.
I bet you that none of the daily newspapers will print any of Darcy Burner’s nonsense from her letter to Dick Cheney.
I wonder how we can ‘boo’ the sacrificial donkette while we cheer for a great VP? Bring it on lil’ donkette, bring it on!
I’m not sure why Goldy prints everything from you, Mr. Pope. Why don’t you start your own blog?
http://www.homesteadbook.com/blog
Richard – see a doctor, get on some medication.
It’s sad to witness your decline so graphically and in public.
Ropa-Popa! Dickie pops blood vessels, goes ALL CAPS!!! Darcy must of hit a nerve with the guy.
Great move by Darcy. Hey Dick, I’ll host a Darcy Burner tea party at my house in Kent if you’ll drop by.
11.
Don’t you know? ALL CAPS makes it TRUE!
So Richard Pope doesn’t have any valid points and personal attacks constitute valid counter points?
Richard Pope ♥ the Clinton Defense
Yes, darcy is quite cute.
But at least we know more about her positions than we did:
She is against any plan that uses are natural resources. I guess that means she is ready to go back to nature, or just continue to import everything we need from those countries that still mine and drill.
She wants to force the military to use body armor that is available, but not wanted, because it adds too much weight and decreases mobility.
She wants tax breaks for corporations. Or wants companies who do business overseas to be punished for it. Or something. Not sure what this means.
She thinks seniors are too stupid to understand the new prescription benefit. This isn’t what real seniors are saying, who seem to be just fine with it, but maybe she only hangs out with ones who aren’t too bright.
She wants to make the average guy struggling to make ends meet and feed a family subsidize college education.
I’m glad to see that she actually came out to the wider public to voice her views. Of course, I could read the dem talking points and get the exact same information.
Jack @14
How ’bout we dispense with the Socratic inquiry and try this instead: You come up with the supporting evidence that Richard neglected to provide for his claims. Then go on to explain what the performance of past Presidential administrations has to do with the issues in the 8th congressional race.
Seems like quite a lot of attention is being paid to this third tier candidate by her opponents.
At what point do the Bush apologists’ self-deceptions grow too much even for them to perpetuate any longer? How is it that there are still 35% of moron-Americans standing with these buffoons? Are you really willing to re-elect someone like rubber-stamp Reichert and let this madness continue unchecked?
1.
Darcy Burner hasn’t been in a position to vote on measures that would correct what she points out as deficiencies on federal policy, Dave Reichert has.
The point isn’t how things got to be how they were from 2005 until now, but what the current Congressman from the 8th District has done to correct them.
Nothing.
I want to know if Kevin Carns actually dresses like a woman when he posts as “Janet S.”
People say that I should be the one coming up with evidence to support these claims of political positions.
WAIT A MINUTE HERE — isn’t Darcy Burner the one who is seeking election to Congress? Isn’t Burner the one who is attacking the incumbent’s record?
Shouldn’t Burner be the one coming up with evidence to support her claims? I didn’t see a shred of evidence in her supposed letter to Dick Cheney.
And this thing about the “prescription drug benefit”? Wasn’t that passed by Congress in 2004 — prior to Dave Reichert being elected to Congress? Reichert didn’t take office until January 2005.
Of course, Darcy Burner can’t tell the truth about what she was doing in 2004, so why should we expect her to tell the truth about Reichert?
Pope A Dope proves he’s as stupid as he appears to be. He seems to think Bill Clinton is running for office again!
Hey Dickie. Here’s the thing, as the web’s leading pretend lawyer, you should at least realize that especially in Washington state, running against Bill Clinton, who isn’t a candidate, won’t help ! ! !
LOL!
why should the Feds have to pay anybody to go to college.
Promote the general welfare ain’t the same as paying for some junior college (high school w/ ashtrays…)
In 2004, Darcy Burner was doing which of the following:
[ ] a. Working as a top-level Microsoft executive
[ ] b. Taking a leave from Microsoft to raise her son Henry
[ ] c. Taking a leave from Microsoft to run for Congress
[ ] d. Attending University of Washington law school
[ ] e. Speeding through school zones
[ ] f. Causing chain reaction collisions and injuring children
[ ] g. All of the above
[ ] h. None of the above
[ ] i. Who cares? BUSH AND HIS CRONIES MUST GO!
Hey Farcy;
What part of Mount Rainier is being threatened by developers?
Are you honestly claiming that, or as I bet, trying to blur some relaxation of forest service (NOT PARK) rules that have zero impact on a NATIONAL PARK.
Correct answer for 2004 is D.
Darcy Burner has variously claimed she was doing A, B and/or C during 2004.
Darcy’s husband Michael did E during 2004.
Burner didn’t do F until 2005.
#22,
You can either back up your claims or you can’t. Which will it be?
But if you are a liberal moonbat, “I” would be the only correct answer.
22.
Darcy Burner hasn’t made any claims on this blog. You have. And by the way, no one is encouraging you to back up your claims. We know you’re tired and need your rest. I was suggesting to Jack @ 14 that rather than attempting to engender sympathy for your positions by calling a foul for the ad-hominem attacks, he might instead consider taking up the banner for you while you rest.
I hope you all followed the link in Goldy’s article on Darcy’s letter to Cienna Madrid’s article in “The Stranger” about Dave Reichert’s kickoff breakfast. I liked it all, but this part in particular:
I wanted to be able to size him [Reichert] up. Instead, this is what I got:
“President Bush’s tax cuts are working… Change is tough…Dreams are still happening. I read Dr. Seuss the other day….” Which flourished into a story about a little boy Reichert spoke with who wishes to grow up and be a paper cup stacker, and how he, Reichert, wants to help create a nation where this little boy can follow his dreams and stack cups for a living. People in the audience were nodding their heads as if they, too, wanted to help poor children learn to stack cups.
I’m sure they all do. That’s why the wingnuts don’t think there’s a need to help kids go to college.
I see Richard Dope is off his meds again.
Cienna’s Madrid’s post in The Stranger about Reichert’s “kickoff” is a must read.
Bizzare. Did some righty here attend the breakfast? Please offer your perspective.
Richard Pope @ 22
“WAIT A MINUTE HERE – isn’t Darcy Burner the one who is seeking election to Congress? Isn’t Burner the one who is attacking the incumbent’s record?
Shouldn’t Burner be the one coming up with evidence to support her claims? I didn’t see a shred of evidence in her supposed letter to Dick Cheney.”
He, he…you are becoming downright apoplectic over Darcy, my friend, and it is taking its toll on your ability to think clearly.
The letter in question is NOT an attack on “the incumbent’s record.” She is attacking the Bush administration with this letter. Sheesh! Get some sleep or something.
Richard Pope does occasionally pull loose fromm his moorings and begins to sound like a typical wingnut. Richard Pope must , mentally, be very tightly wound to try to maintain the illusion of normal cognition.
A Promethean effort, to be sure. But , it’s all Clinton’s fault ,anyway!
What do Sheriff Davie and Darcy have in common?
1) Straight As in Law School? Nope just Darcy got straight As.
2) Traffic tickets? Nope, Darcy’s only had one, Sheriff Davie two!
3) Tom DeLay gave them a bunch of money that came directly from criminal lobbyist Jack Abramoff? Nope, just Davie took that money.
#35 is a good point…if I was really into opposing what the present mis-administration was doing, instead of just trying to get or keep a gig where I could go to Foggy Bottom and play big shot, I’d certainly jump at an opportunity to spend some face time with one of the authors of this entire disaster and try to talk some sense into him.
Oh, yeah…I have no doubt whatsoever that our esteemed Champions of Unfettered Capitalism would be more than happy to let the chainsaw jockeys loose in Rainier National Park if they thought they could get away with it. Either that, or close all campgrounds, kick out the riff-raff and turn Paradise into an ultra-luxo playground for themselves and their rich pals.
RUFUS IS CAPTURED!!!
Does this mean he won’t be posting on HA anymore? For story, see http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12391542/
I am still interested in the so-called “Republican Plan” for “developers and private interests such as mining companies to take over and ruin” Mount Rainier National Park.
Anyone have any details on this plan? Or where I can find a web-link to this plan?
HAH! A Candidate With Balls!!!!! I LOOOOVE IT.
This, Democrats, is HOW YOU FUCKING DEAL WITH THESE PEOPLE!
You constantly, relentlessly, unendingly kick them in the nuts. You mock them at every opportunity. You deride them. You respond to NOTHING they say UNLESS YOU FUCKING FEEL LIKE IT. Every opportunity to talk is an opportunity to say “Republicans are fraudulent, corrupt, bully-boy FAGGOTS like Richard Pope, who start to cry like little fucking girls as soon as you stand up to them.”
“EEyh! She’s not really an ‘executive’, she’s just a manager. eeeyh! She got into a traffic accident! Eeyh! How come SHE got into Harvard??? It’s not faaaiiirr! It’s not faiiirr! Our candidate is gonna beat her up! He’s big and strong and she’s just GIRL!”
Yeah, welcome to the world of “Your Candidate is a Fucking Fraud Who Took 20 Years to Catch The Green River Killer, cause he SUCKS!”
Oh, and America would take BILL CLINTON over Bush Jr. in a heartbeat.
Oh, and you’re losing in Iraq because you suck.
Oh, and your party has officially SPENT MORE MONEY than the Democrats.
Oh, and your party imports illegal aliens, just like they export jobs to China and for the same reasons.
Oh, and your President admitted that with his “Guest Worker” illegal alien importation plan.
Oh, and you suck again.
And what does Darcy Burner propose doing about the “prescription drug benefit”? Burner criticizes Reichert for supporting it, so presumably she wants to eliminate it. How does that benefit senior citizens who are struggling to afford health care?
[America under President Hillary………Rhodesia to Zimbabwe, California to Baja Norte, Detroit to a black Hillary Shit Hole, and South Central LA to Democrat Hell READ ON!!!!!]The Zimbabwean authorities will deal “mercilessly” with anyone who dares to march against the government, the president, Robert Mugabe, warned crowds gathered for Independence Day celebrations in the capital yesterday. In a sports stadium dotted with police and soldiers, the Zimbabwean leader said anyone contemplating protests was “playing with fire”.
Mugabe has just about totally wrecked Zimbabwe. But criticizing him would be “politically incorrect,” so Western elites do nothing.
The thing to remember here, is that a vote for Darcy, and a victory for Darcy will not only be a step towards wresting the majority away from neocons and theocons in the House, but a victory for Darcy will be a devastating blow to Pope-a-Dope’s Ego.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/.....ource=mypi
Looks like Sheriff Davie’s asshole buddy Karl “KKK” Rove has been demoted. HE HE!
Well he’s going to jail when we take over the Congress so I guess it’s just as well the Bush regime demotes the dicksucker now. Saves time when we put him in his orange jumpsuit.
Maybe he can hire the pretend lawyer Pope-A-Dope to defend him?
26
Geez, Richard, why don’t you give us a “poll” that requires a smidgeon of thought! This one is a no-brainer:
“In 2004, Darcy Burner was doing which of the following:
[ ] a. Working as a top-level Microsoft executive
[ ] b. Taking a leave from Microsoft to raise her son Henry
[ ] c. Taking a leave from Microsoft to run for Congress
[ ] d. Attending University of Washington law school
[ ] e. Speeding through school zones
[ ] f. Causing chain reaction collisions and injuring children
[ ] g. All of the above
[ ] h. None of the above
[X] i. Who cares? BUSH AND HIS CRONIES MUST GO!
Commentby Richard Pope— 4/19/06@ 4:12 pm”
Speaking of which, according to King 5 TV, Bush’s approval rating has dropped to 32 percent.
Meanwhile, Newsweek says the U.S. may “never” leave Iraq because the U.S. troop presence is the only thing preventing that society’s total disintegration. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12...../newsweek/
Bush gives us Iraq: The “gift” that just keeps on taking.
re 40: I have some details that I remember from a Seattle Times article a few mo. ago. The government is selling land to mining companies that was formerly just leased to them as long as there is a certain degree of construction on the mine site. There are also selected parcels that are being sold in National Parks — like on the South side of Mount Ranier — that arer difficult to access.
The land is being sold to cover the costs of the tax breaks given to the rich.
“The land is being sold to cover the costs of the tax breaks given to the rich.”
Commentby harry poon [Hehe, comment by Karl Marx] The rich must pay more Always more Tax the rich until they…………..leave!!! Atlas has Shrugged, Poon!!
3
“BY REQUIRING STUDENTS TO PROVIDE PROOF OF U.S. CITIZENSHIP OR LEGAL IMMIGRANT STATUS IN ORDER TO GET STUDENT LOANS? Commentby Richard Pope— 4/19/06@ 2:51 pm”
You don’t pay much attention to MSM news reports, do you Richard? Apparently it flew over your head that the $50 billion of budget cuts jammed through Congress by Republicans a short time ago hit student financial aid hard, and also cut funding for enforcing child support.
Typical Republican crapola: Finance wars of conquest and tax cuts for the super-rich by picking on students, single mothers, and veterans’ health care.
Poon – What the fuck are you talking about “paying for tax cuts”. I spent half the fucking night yesterday explaining that tax RATE cuts INCREASE tax receipts. Tax cuts don’t have to be “paid for” you fucking idiot. Tax cuts GENERATE more revenue. Ronald Reagan proved it.
The logic is simple enough for even a delirious moonbat to understand. When the “investor class” ie successful people get to keep more of THEIR money, they invest it in businesses. Business generates wealth. But when government gets money it goes down a fucking rathole because it isn’t used to create anything.
Ya gotta stop drinking old media kook aid. “Tax cuts” are actually tax RATE cuts. The RATE cuts generate MORE revenue.
RE 53: That’s what I told them at the grocery store: If I pay you LESS money it will actually be MORE.
They did not buy it.
Rabbit – Students already get an 80% subsidy at gummint universities and 100% subsidy at public schools through grade 12. How much more fucking money should they get? Should all education be free? What’s wrong with having the beneficiaries of education pay a tiny slice of it?
Single mothers getting screwed? Please, they made their choices. They can live with them. Their choices ARE NOT MY FUCKING PROBLEM. If ya can’t feed ’em, don’t breed ’em.
And just because you were too stoopid, lazy and irresponsible to manage your finances, DOES NOT MEAN that the taxpayers should pick up the tab for your medical expenses. You made the choices. You live with them. The fact that you have to spend 1/3 of your income is NOT MY FUCKING PROBLEM.
Poon… textbook example of “aggressive stoopidity”. Hey harry, don’t let facts and logic get in the way of your feeeeeelings…
Mary The Redneck @ 55
Well, you are too stupid to understand that spending = income, income X taxation = government revenue, when revenue < spending you get deficits. Therefore, when Reagan and Bush Jr. INCREASED SPENDING VASTLY, government revenue went up AND there were deficits. So, I don't think a persuasive case for LESS spending on education will EVER come from YOU. YOU constitute a prima facia case that America is not spending enough by far.
is less than spending you get deficits. Thus, when Reagan and Bush Jr. VASTLY INCREASED SPENDING you got more revenue AND deficits.
Since you can’t even understand that simple arithmetic, I don’t think ANY case for LESS spending on education will EVER come from you. YOU are a prima facia case that America does not spend enough.
To the political religions of the 20th century and their fanatical believers that plague us to this day , I would list Marxism, Fascism, and I would add: “American Corporatism”. It has an ideology, sacred beliefs that are not grounded in fact, but in faith, like: a- “free markets” b- “invisible hands” c- “taxing the rich impoverishes us all” , and many more!
What a bunch of TWATS!!!
When MTR got his cousin pregnant in 8th grade, he had to quit school and get a paper route to help support the baby. Now, sixty years later, he can barely read, he’s living on social security, and he’s never earned more than $13,000 a year in his entire, sad life. As a poor man, he’s paid very little in taxes, he’s often had to rely on public health (veneral disease), and he’s occaisionally been in trouble with the law, mostly because he can’t pay his speeding tickets.
Had the “gummint” stepped in sixty years ago and helped out the story might be different. With a decent education MTR might even have been able to learn “his numbers and cipherin and such”. Thus equipped he might have been able to hold down a steady job, stay out of jail, contribute to the economy, buy a trailer and even pay some taxes. In fact, its likely he would have paid much more in taxes in his lifetime than it would have cost the “gummint” to save him from his sad fate.
Oh, and America would take BILL CLINTON over Bush Jr. in a heartbeat.
Commentby dlaw— 4/19/06@ 5:51 pm
Yeah, yeah yeah with the help of Ross Perot sucking off 20% of the vote which would go to the repub. A majority of Americans did want him in 96. The only reason he broke 49% was because of all the fraudulent donk votes.
Can somebody please explain why Republicans don’t think writing “gummint” and “guvment” makes them look like hillbilly dickheads? I mean, just because that’s the way their Mamas said it, don’t they know how fucking stupid it looks?
re 53: And I explained to you that Reagan presided over the largest tax hike in history ( albeit , under the table ) in the form of DOUBLING the Social Security withholding — all of which he spent to make himself look better. And it was all off the books. Neat trick, huh? Also, I pointed out that tax revenues ALWAYS go up. It’s a historical trend.
The % of increase under Reagan , however, was very low. It may have been the lowest > I’m not certain. But it was very low.
RUFUS @ 61
Even with all the Republican Bullshit about Clinton getting a piece of round ass in the White House, BUSH IS STILL SETTING RECORDS FOR UNPOPULARITY.
So, I think Bill Clinton would pretty much beat Bush Jr. in a fucking walk. Why? Well, deficits, Iraq, corruption, being completely fucking stupid TIME and TIME and TIME again, a laughably unpopular Social Security program, and the most unpopular (and expensive) Medicare program in history.
Yeah, I think Bill Clinton would not have too much trouble with little Bushie Jr.
Mary The Redneck @ 53 “I spent half the fucking night yesterday explaining that tax RATE cuts INCREASE tax receipts.”
Too bad that you wasted half a night explaining complete and utter bullshit. How are those record deficits working out for your theory, Mary?
Sucks to be a Neocon Symp when every drop of Kool Aid they gave you to drink contained nothing but lies.
Mary The Redneck @ 55 “Single mothers getting screwed? Please, they made their choices. They can live with them. Their choices ARE NOT MY FUCKING PROBLEM. If ya can’t feed ‘em, don’t breed ‘em.”
How much was that child support payment you keep whining about, huh, Mary?
Goldy, it might be time to kill letting trolls post on your site.
Mary The Redneck @ 53
Yeah I read youlast night trying to explain how when taxes go to zero revenues go to infinity BUT IT WAS ALL CRAP SO WE DISPENSED WITH IT.
What we proved last night is that you are too fucking stupid to realize that deficit spending also increases revenue, it just doesn’t pay for itself in the short term. Reagan proved that conclusively. And when you do it stupidly it doesn’t pay for itself in the long run, either. That’s what little Bushie Jr. is busy proving.
“Me” @ 68
Shut the fuck up, fairy princess. I am having a ball mocking these puckering assholes.
RUFUS @ 61
Oh and letting a single levy break destroy New Orleans WHEN HE WAS IN CHARGE OF HOMELAND SECURITY and having no plan to help the people because he is a worthless bigot.
George Bush has always BEEN PROTECTED he is can’t protect the homeland and he is a DANGER TO AMERICA.
Oh, and fuck you, you stupid, lame-brained fucking hillbilly.
64
You have to keep it perspective. Remember Bush Jr was the first president to get over 50% of the popular vote since his father in 1988. No one remembers approval ratings when everything is said and done. The mid term elections are over half a year away, an eternity in politics.
Me @ 68,
don’t you realize that “trolls” like JCH, MTR, RUFUS, righton, Janet, etc. don’t actually exist? We’ve created them to amuse ourselves and to keep Richard Pope (who, god help us all, really does exist) preoccupied so he won’t go up a clock tower with a rifle.
RUFUS @ 72
Well, it’s certainly true that nobody ever remembers approval ratings this bad. Bush is setting records there.
Republicans are running away from Bush Jr. as fast as they can. Why don’t you go to McGacick and tell him he should run on the Bush record?
Here’s a hint: because McGavick will say “Who the fuck let this hillbilly moron in here?” And throw your ass out while he’s laughing at you.
Vagina Lips claim: Tax cuts GENERATE more revenue.
Proof offered: None.
Idiot.
The trolls say “gummint” because they are “igrint”.
In 94 Democrats ran away from Clinton but it didn’t help. That was a slaughter in biblical proportions. That was because the repubs had a plan, remember welfare reform. Come on dlaw this is recent history.
You have to keep it perspective. Remember Bush Jr was the first president to get over 50% of the popular vote since his father in 1988.
Year, please?
Relevance, please?
Vagina Lips: “I spent half the fucking night yesterday explaining that tax RATE cuts INCREASE tax receipts.”
One wonders at the shape of your indifference curves. Alas, I fear it was a night wasted. Differentiate that, asshole.
78
Year would be 2004. Bush won with a little over 51% of the popular vote. Bush probably got over 52% if all the fraudulent vote was subtracted out. Hey I will take it.
Mark the Fuckhead-
I don’t care HOW many times you explain it…YOU’RE STILL WRONG!
It’s BAD economic policy!
It DOESN’T work!
Dick Cheney…creator of the rethuglican “Culture of DEATH.”
Janet S…ignorant slut.
Jasper [JCH], don’t abandon me now! I’m beating this rap, buddy. Send more money for my re-election campaign. More. More. More. We gotta’ stick together and teach those commie mo’fo’s a lesson. I KILLED BUGS FOR A LIVVVVVVVING. I am the ruler of THE KNOWN WORLD!!!! TERRY SCHIAVO LIVES!!! Her cranium if filled with the billuous ether of Biblical life!!!!Bill Frist is the greatest physician that ever fondled a stethescope. Gawwwwwwwd am I horny. I want you, [JCH]. Shrug, Atlas. Ohhhhhhh,………shrug for me, baby. Shrugga’, shrugga’, shrugga’. I feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel the release of republican party freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedom. GAWD. GAWD. GAWD.
What is all this yammering about Clinton?
You know, I, for one ,am grateful that I no longer have to listen to a bunch of crazy swill about R. Reagan, the “amiable dunce”, being the “best President ever” when he was clearly one of the worst. Dubya eclipses even him as a complete dud.
@80: Year would be 2004.
Just wanted to inquire if you were paying attention. Take out the GOP fraudulent vote: Bush 49%; Kerry 50.2% The fact that you are “living with it” is irrelevant.
Okay, JCH is definitely the most vulgar, creepy Republi-troll here.
Mary The Redneck is certainly has the largest, totally unjustified ego.
But is Rufus the absolute stupidest ever? I mean I think he is. He is just one of these people whose mind is essentially unresponsive. You write “Bush”. He writes “Clinton”. It means nothing to him if the two things are related OR whether he makes a complete ass out of himself.
But I don’t know. I suppose their COULD be stupider Republi-trolls than Rufus. It’s difficuly to imagine, of course, but I don’t know the archives well enough.
Any thoughts?
Rujax @ 81
For Mary The Redneck to “explain” something, he would first have to “understand” something. But Mary doesn’t even know what shape the Laffer Curve is (the real one, not the magic one). Mary thinks that as taxes approach zero, government revenue approaches infinity.
What his argument proves conclusively is that he’s a fucking idiot. Other than that, I’d rather be reading Rufus.
85
There were more fraudulent votes for Kerry in KC alone then all the fraudulent votes, if any, for Bush in the entire nation. The diebold conspiracy is just an antiseptic for being a looooooooooser.
Nuff saiud.
88 – Might as well face it (DOOFUS) you’re addicted to lies…
Apologies to Robert Palmer
89
Yeah yeah. The donks show their true colors every time they whine about voter registration challenges. We all know why the dems don’t want the voter rolls clean up. Geeeesh.
RUFUS @ 88
Oh, brother…. Still a sore loser, huh?
Get help for your problems, dude.
Richard Pope @ 42
“And what does Darcy Burner propose doing about the “prescription drug benefit”? Burner criticizes Reichert for supporting it, so presumably she wants to eliminate it. How does that benefit senior citizens who are struggling to afford health care?”
You might be on to something there, Richard. Apparently, we could slash some government and get better prices without the drug benefit. Not surprisingly, the Bush plan doesn’t work very well.
RUFUS!!!! DUDE!!
Tell us all about how “most Republicans are fighting in Iraq now”!!
I love that story!!
RIchard Pope @ 42 “How does that benefit senior citizens who are struggling to afford health care?â€
Hey, I have an idea!!! Let Medicare actually use their volume to make perscription drugs CHEAPER!!!
Now there is a great idea that Bush and THe Rubber Stamp Congress shit on very early in the game.
How are they gonna pay off their buddies in Big Pharm if they can’t choke the last pennies out of Senior Citizens?
Bush’s Prescription Drug Benifit Plan is the Enron of Medicare Reform.
Only instead of just California electricity consumers and Enron stock holders getting screwed, Bush’s Prescription Drug Plan fucks everyone in the ass!
Hey Donna
“…higher PRODUCTIVITY means fewer jobs…”
Commentby Donnageddon— 4/9/06@ 4:06 pm
Still doing your part to keep the economy going I see. Hehehehehe
New from moonbat press, the book everyone is talking about:
Higher PRODUCTIVITY means fewer jobs.
by Donnageddon
Hehehehehehehe Ahhh what a riot!!!
Well I got my laughs for the day. Thanks Donna.
re 96: High productivity and cheap labor does mean fewer jobs. A small child could understand that. Are you insane? [hehe]
I’m glad you are amused, RUFUS.
Now if only you could explain why?
If productivity did not destroy jobs, many of us would still be working the soil as subsistence farmers. The question is this: What is done with the resources freed up by the job displacement?
At the extreme, sci-fi fans commonly imagine civillizations so technologically advanced that just a few “workers” (or intelligent machines) provide for the needs of all. So, where did all those jobs go?
You get the idea, I’m sure.
26. I
Deal with it. Your ‘pResident’ is more hated than Clinton ever was. By 5 billion people or more around the world. Bill made some mistakes. Some big ones, like NAFTA. Some small ones like Monica. So what. Unlike Bush, every mistake Bill made was correctible. Bush has created a mess that will take generations to clean up.
3ksdcyvvxr http://www.433163.com/474704.html bi26hbabn