<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election watch open thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://horsesass.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=47637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637</link>
	<description>The straight poop on WA politics &#38; the press</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:14:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: No Time for Fascists</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199267</link>
		<dc:creator>No Time for Fascists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199267</guid>
		<description>@214. Serial &lt;em&gt;&quot;Ridicule the looks an African American girl and call it a joke&quot;&lt;/em&gt; conservative is a petty mean little man to the bitter end.  He never missed a chance for cheap shot. 

He personified one of the big problems I see with the Republican Party. He would never, never discuss why the Republicans were better; he could only say, over and over, that the Democrats were wrong. 
I fault him for that. If he truly believed what the Republicans stand for, he would be able to advocate for those ideals, again and again, despite it being a room mostly of progressives.  

All he seemed to have was hate and greed and maybe, in hindsight, that&#039;s what he did advocate for; over, over and over again. So maybe he was being true to his values and the values of the Republican Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@214. Serial <em>&#8220;Ridicule the looks an African American girl and call it a joke&#8221;</em> conservative is a petty mean little man to the bitter end.  He never missed a chance for cheap shot. </p>
<p>He personified one of the big problems I see with the Republican Party. He would never, never discuss why the Republicans were better; he could only say, over and over, that the Democrats were wrong.<br />
I fault him for that. If he truly believed what the Republicans stand for, he would be able to advocate for those ideals, again and again, despite it being a room mostly of progressives.  </p>
<p>All he seemed to have was hate and greed and maybe, in hindsight, that&#8217;s what he did advocate for; over, over and over again. So maybe he was being true to his values and the values of the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gman</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199245</link>
		<dc:creator>Gman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199245</guid>
		<description>@214 That&#039;s because you are one stupid fuck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@214 That&#8217;s because you are one stupid fuck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhp6033</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199207</link>
		<dc:creator>rhp6033</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199207</guid>
		<description># 223:

John Roberts…age 57
&lt;strong&gt;Antonin Scalia…age 76
Anthony Kennedy…age 76
Clarence Thomas…age 74&lt;/strong&gt;
Ruth Bader Ginsberg…age 79
Stephen Breyer…age 74
Samuel Alito…age 62
Sonia Sotomayor…age 58
Elena Kagan…age 52

Gee, I dunno.  Ruth Bader Ginsbert is the oldest on the bench. And Steven Brer is the same age as Thomas - age 74. Besides, it&#039;s not that unsusual for a Supreme Court Justice to stay on the bench into their 80&#039;s, as long as they are basically healthy.  

The four highlighted Republican appointees in their 70&#039;s won&#039;t leave the court in the next four years unless they have no other choice (simply can&#039;t get out of bed, or taken out feet-first). The figure they can hold on for another years, and hope a Republican is elected in 2016. 

If a Democrat is elected in 2016, however, that changes the dynamics. The Republican-nominated justices may have to face the prospect of at least four, maybe eight more years of work. Granted, there are worse jobs than being a Supreme Court Justice. But at some point they may begin to ask - &quot;Do I really have to get out of bed this morning and put on that silly robe and go to work?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 223:</p>
<p>John Roberts…age 57<br />
<strong>Antonin Scalia…age 76<br />
Anthony Kennedy…age 76<br />
Clarence Thomas…age 74</strong><br />
Ruth Bader Ginsberg…age 79<br />
Stephen Breyer…age 74<br />
Samuel Alito…age 62<br />
Sonia Sotomayor…age 58<br />
Elena Kagan…age 52</p>
<p>Gee, I dunno.  Ruth Bader Ginsbert is the oldest on the bench. And Steven Brer is the same age as Thomas &#8211; age 74. Besides, it&#8217;s not that unsusual for a Supreme Court Justice to stay on the bench into their 80&#8217;s, as long as they are basically healthy.  </p>
<p>The four highlighted Republican appointees in their 70&#8217;s won&#8217;t leave the court in the next four years unless they have no other choice (simply can&#8217;t get out of bed, or taken out feet-first). The figure they can hold on for another years, and hope a Republican is elected in 2016. </p>
<p>If a Democrat is elected in 2016, however, that changes the dynamics. The Republican-nominated justices may have to face the prospect of at least four, maybe eight more years of work. Granted, there are worse jobs than being a Supreme Court Justice. But at some point they may begin to ask &#8211; &#8220;Do I really have to get out of bed this morning and put on that silly robe and go to work?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhp6033</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199200</link>
		<dc:creator>rhp6033</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199200</guid>
		<description>A note to Serial:

Glad to see you sticking around, at least so far. I was convinced for a while that you were someone who was being paid to post on multiple websites the Republican message for the day. I hope that by remaining here, you might prove me wrong, as I expect those operations to have closed up shop by midnight last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A note to Serial:</p>
<p>Glad to see you sticking around, at least so far. I was convinced for a while that you were someone who was being paid to post on multiple websites the Republican message for the day. I hope that by remaining here, you might prove me wrong, as I expect those operations to have closed up shop by midnight last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199198</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199198</guid>
		<description>&quot;Was anyone a bigger winner last night than Bill Clinton?&quot;

Looking at the electoral map, I&#039;d say probably everyone but the New-World-Order-theo-fascist-the-south-will-rise-again types.  The GOP really needs to come up with a plan to put them back in their cage and once again come off as a party that represents the right of center and not just the far right.  If they don&#039;t find a way to change course towards center, they&#039;ll be increasingly irrelevant with each election cycle.  It&#039;s really not for the GOP that they need to do this, as at this point I&#039;d have to say that it&#039;s for the sake of the nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Was anyone a bigger winner last night than Bill Clinton?&#8221;</p>
<p>Looking at the electoral map, I&#8217;d say probably everyone but the New-World-Order-theo-fascist-the-south-will-rise-again types.  The GOP really needs to come up with a plan to put them back in their cage and once again come off as a party that represents the right of center and not just the far right.  If they don&#8217;t find a way to change course towards center, they&#8217;ll be increasingly irrelevant with each election cycle.  It&#8217;s really not for the GOP that they need to do this, as at this point I&#8217;d have to say that it&#8217;s for the sake of the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhp6033</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199189</link>
		<dc:creator>rhp6033</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199189</guid>
		<description>YLB @ 236: One of the big problems with the Republican Party is that they have become so insular. They only talk among themselves, they don&#039;t care what minorities and unmarried women think (they figure white males will tell married women what to think). In this insular environment, where they listen only to Fox News, attend conservative churches, and socialize only with other Republicans, they become tone-deaf to the problems of other people, and how they are perceived by them. 

So I don&#039;t think the Republican projections leading up to this election are entirely grand-standing. I think they are simply ignoring evidence which contradicts their view of the country. After all, if every member of their country club thinks just like them, doesn&#039;t that indicate that it&#039;s the polls which are in error?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YLB @ 236: One of the big problems with the Republican Party is that they have become so insular. They only talk among themselves, they don&#8217;t care what minorities and unmarried women think (they figure white males will tell married women what to think). In this insular environment, where they listen only to Fox News, attend conservative churches, and socialize only with other Republicans, they become tone-deaf to the problems of other people, and how they are perceived by them. </p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t think the Republican projections leading up to this election are entirely grand-standing. I think they are simply ignoring evidence which contradicts their view of the country. After all, if every member of their country club thinks just like them, doesn&#8217;t that indicate that it&#8217;s the polls which are in error?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rujax!</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199188</link>
		<dc:creator>Rujax!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199188</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;214. Serial conservative spews:

@213

You know, I have a good life, and like most of the people on HA I’m going to be OK regardless of the election outcome. I learned a lot from a lot of the commenters on here, and certainly from Darryl’s posts. It’s really why I’m here – so that I don’t spend all my time around like-minded individuals.

Although thinking back, Gman, I’m pretty sure I learned nothing from you.
11/07/2012 at 7:44 am&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Me too, fuckwad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>214. Serial conservative spews:</p>
<p>@213</p>
<p>You know, I have a good life, and like most of the people on HA I’m going to be OK regardless of the election outcome. I learned a lot from a lot of the commenters on here, and certainly from Darryl’s posts. It’s really why I’m here – so that I don’t spend all my time around like-minded individuals.</p>
<p>Although thinking back, Gman, I’m pretty sure I learned nothing from you.<br />
11/07/2012 at 7:44 am</p></blockquote>
<p>Me too, fuckwad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rujax!</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199187</link>
		<dc:creator>Rujax!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199187</guid>
		<description>Republicans are DEAD for another 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans are DEAD for another 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rujax!</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199186</link>
		<dc:creator>Rujax!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199186</guid>
		<description>&#039;Ol Rujax called it at @6.

Me and Nate Silver!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Ol Rujax called it at @6.</p>
<p>Me and Nate Silver!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rujax!</title>
		<link>http://horsesass.org/?p=47637&#038;cpage=5#comment-1199185</link>
		<dc:creator>Rujax!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://horsesass.org/?p=47637#comment-1199185</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;228. Serial conservative spews:

@ 223

Hillary might get to appoint a few, too!

Was anyone a bigger winner last night than Bill Clinton?
11/07/2012 at 8:43 am&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah asshole...
&lt;strong&gt;
Barack Hussein Obama, 44th President of the United States of America, Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces!!!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>228. Serial conservative spews:</p>
<p>@ 223</p>
<p>Hillary might get to appoint a few, too!</p>
<p>Was anyone a bigger winner last night than Bill Clinton?<br />
11/07/2012 at 8:43 am</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah asshole&#8230;<br />
<strong><br />
Barack Hussein Obama, 44th President of the United States of America, Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces!!!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
